Language selection

Search

Patent 2104179 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2104179
(54) English Title: ISOLATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ACCELERATIONS AND TILTS ON MOVING PLATFORM
(54) French Title: COMPENSATION DES ACCELERATIONS ET DES INCLINAISONS DE MODE COMMUN SUR PLATE-FORME MOBILE
Status: Deemed Abandoned and Beyond the Period of Reinstatement - Pending Response to Notice of Disregarded Communication
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • G5D 3/12 (2006.01)
  • G1C 9/08 (2006.01)
  • G1C 21/18 (2006.01)
  • G1V 7/16 (2006.01)
  • G5D 13/62 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • PANENKA, JERRY R. (Canada)
(73) Owners :
  • NORANDA INC.
  • CANAGRAV RESEARCH LTD.
(71) Applicants :
  • NORANDA INC. (Canada)
  • CANAGRAV RESEARCH LTD. (Canada)
(74) Agent: FRANCOIS NADEAUNADEAU, FRANCOIS
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(22) Filed Date: 1993-08-16
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 1995-02-17
Examination requested: 1993-08-16
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data: None

Abstracts

English Abstract


12
Abstract of the Disclosure:
A system for compensating for horizontal
common-mode acceleration and tilt on a moving platform
including a laboratory motion isolation table or
borehole logging probe, by transforming horizontal
accelerations of the platform into vertical
accelerations, comprises a tilt table mounted on the
platform, a sensor mounted on the tilt table or on the
platform for sensing linear accelerations and tilts to
which the platform is subjected, and a tilting device
mounted on the platform and responsive to the sensor for
tilting the tilt table to compensate for horizontal
accelerations and tilts to which the platform is
subjected.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


9
CLAIMS
1. A system for compensating for horizontal common-
mode acceleration and tilt on a moving platform
including a laboratory motion isolation table or
borehole logging probe, by transforming horizontal
accelerations of the platform into vertical
accelerations, comprising:
a) a tilt table mounted on the platform;
b) a sensor mounted on the tilt table or on the
platform for sensing linear accelerations and
tilts to which the platform is subjected; and
c) a tilting device mounted on the platform and
responsive to the said sensor for tilting the
tilt table to compensate for horizontal
accelerations and tilts to which the platform
is subjected.
2. A system as defined in claim 1, wherein the sensor
is a horizontal accelerometer or an electronic bubble
level, in closed feedback loop with the said tilting
device.
3. A system as defined in claim 1, wherein in case of
accelerometer-based gravity gradiometry using
accelerometer pairs, the sensor output is provided by at
least one accelerometer of the gradiometer pairs, in
closed feedback loop with the said tilting device.
4. A system as defined in claim 1, wherein the sensor

is an Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU), which may be
installed either on a tilt table capable of working in a
Shuler-tuned closed loop configuration with the tilting
device, or separately in open loop configuration with
the tilting device, as a part of an autopilot, motion
compensation or other device.
5. A system as defined in claim 1, further comprising
a feedback controller responsive to the output of the
sensor for applying a regulated feedback control to the
tilting device to cause the table to tilt by an angle
that will compensate for horizontal accelerations and
tilts.
6. A system as defined in claim 5, wherein the
feedback controller is a proportional-integral-
derivative feedback controller.
7. A system as defined in claim 1 wherein said tilt
table is a two-stage table comprising a first coarsely
controlled stage using a servo-motor as a tilting
device, and a second finely-controlled stage using a
transducer as a tilting device.
8. A system as defined in claim 7, wherein the second
stage includes a high frequency vibration insolation
stage comprising x, y,z translation devices responsive
to vibration sensors.
9. A system as defined in claim 7, wherein the sensor

11
and tilting device are combined in a single
sensor/tilting unit.
10. A system as defined in claim 9, wherein the
sensor/tilting unit is a critically-damped pendulum.
11. A system as defined in claim 9, wherein the
sensor/tilting unit is a dish filled with liquid, on
which the tilt table floats.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


,
:~ ISOL~ATION OF I~NVIRONDlEMTAI~
ACC13L~3RATIONS AND TII~TS ON MOVING PI.ATFORM
! This invention relates to a system for compensating
for the effects of horizontal accelerations and tilts,
on a moving platform, such as an air-, land-, water-, or
space-borne vehicle or in a borehole-logging probe, or
on a laboratory motion isolation (seismic) table.
~ac~ground of the Invention
When carrying out high resolution measurements
involving free or partially free masses on a moving
platform, it is often desirable to compensate for the
effect of horizontal accelerations as well as tilts.
For example, let us consider an air-borne gravity
gradiometer based either on pendulous or other
accelerometer pairs. One way to reduce the effect of
horizontal common-mode acceleration on the above sensors
is to match the accelerometers over a very broad dynamic
range and to closely maintain their alignment. Neither
may be attainable to a sufficient degree with present
technology.

1 7 9
Tilts can, with expensive gimballed platforms, be
, ~ maintained to within a few micro-radians. Compensation
for horizontal accelerations (which are typically .01 -
.02 G during survey regime) has not been accomplished to
date.
Statement of Invention
`~ The present invention is based on the principle of
3 equivalence between tilt ~ (x,) and ~ (y) and horizontal
accelerations (x) or (y), which states that an
accelerometer cannot distinguish between horizontal
acceleration and tilt. Consequently, the effect of x
and y on a moving platform can be compensated for by
tilting the platform by an angle ~ (x,y),
where tan ~ (x) = x
tan ~ (y) = y with x and y
expressed in G's
This operation transforms (in platform body co-
ordinates), horizontal accelerations x, y into a
vertical acceleration z, to which a pendulous hori~ontal
accelerometer is relatively insensitive. Tilting is the
most effective way to compensate for large-amplitude,
low-frequency (below 1 Hz) horizontal accelerations.
High-frequency, low amplitude motions (vibrations) can
be attenuated, for example with a piezo-electric (PZT)
driven translational x, y, z stage.
.

The system in accordance with the present invention
comprises a tilt table mounted on a moving platform
including a laboratory motion isolation table or a
borehole logging probe, a sensor mounted on the tilt
3 5 table or on the platform for sensing linear
accelerations and tilts to which the platform is
subjected, and a tilting device mounted on the platform
~; and responsive to the sensor for tilting the tilt tableto compensate for horizontal accelerations and tilts to
which the platform is subjected.
The sensor may be, for example, a horizontal
I accelerometer such as the QA 3000 manufactured by
Sundstrand Data Control Inc., Redmond, Wash., or an
electronic bubble level in closed feedback loop with the
tilting device.
The sensor may also be an Inertial Measurement Unit
(IMU) like H423 manufactured by Honeywell Inc. of
Clearwater, Florida. If an IMU is used as a gravity
sensor, it can be, for lower noise, installed on a tilt
table in a Shuler-tuned closed loop configuration with
the tilting device. Alternatively, the IMU may be a
part of an autopilot, motion compensation or other
device, working in open-loop configuration with the
tilting device.
In the case of accelerometer-based gravity
gradiometry, the sensor output may be provided by
;., ,, , : , , : ,
.. . . . -

accelerometers of the gradiometer pairs. In this
application, the sensor may be a part of the feedback
loop with the tilting device thus substantially
eliminating the horizontal cornmon-mode component of the
gravity gradient signal.
The sensor output signal is preferably processed
through a feedback controller for applying a regulated
feedback control to the tilting device to cause the
sensor base to tilt by an angle that will compensate for
horizontal accelerations and tilts. The feedback
controller is preferably a proportional-integral-
derivative feedback controller.
The tilt table may be a two stage table comprising
a first coarsely controlled stage using a servo-motor as
lS a tilting device, and a second finely controlled stage
using a transducer as a tilting device.
The sensor and tilting device may be combined in a
single sensor/tilting unit. The sensor/tilting unit may
be a critically-damped pendulum or a "dish" filled with
liquid, on which the tilt table floats. In either cases
a feedback controller will not be required for the first
coarse stage.
Short Descri~tion of ths Drawing
The invention will now be disclosed, by way of
example, with reference to preferred embodiments
illustrated in the accompanying drawings in which:
.: :, : : : . . .

~1UL1j ~ 9
~:l 5
:~ Figure 1 shows a two-stage, two degrees of freedom
(DOF), pitch and roll, active motion isolation table
configuration which will attenuate residual horizontal
. accelerations and tilts;
~3 5 Figure 2 shows a single-stage, DOF (pitch and
; roll), active motion isolation table configurationi and
; Figure 3 shows a two-stage, active motion isolation
table configuration similar to Figure 1 which will
additionally attenuate vibrations along x, y and z axes
(five or six DOF).
~etailed Descri~tion of a Preferred ~mbodiment
Referring to Figure 1, there is shown a two-stage
tilt table in the form of a coarsely-controlled table
and a finely-controlled table 2, which are affected by
i 15 linear acceleration disturbance (t) and angular tilt
disturbance (t). In accordance with the present
invention, both of these disturbances are compensated
for by tilting the sensor base by angle O (table 2),
using a servo-motor 3 operating a precision lead screw
(not shown) to provide a linear displacement to a ~.
resolution of about 5 - 10 micro-radians. For greater
resolution than can be achieved with a mechanical ,
device, a pie~oelectric device (PZT) device, or electro - - -.
strictive or magneto-strictive (EST or MST
respectively), or any other suitable transducer 4 is
mounted on table 1 to provide a resolution of the order
,: , . :
i':.; :' : , ,
,

7 9
of 10 nano-radians or better.
or the purpose of the description, it is assumed
that the disturbances to be compensated for are in the
(x, z) vertical plane of motion. The tilt tables may
however be modified to accommodate motions in all six
degrees of freedom.
In the present embodiment, the sensors are
pendulous acceleration sensors 5 and 6, which are
mounted on tables 1 and 2 respectively to sense
horizontal accelerations (and tilts). The output
voltage V(t) of each accelerometer is sensed by à
detector 7 and fed to a feedback controller 8 which
applies a feedback voltage to the servo-motor or the PZT
through a suitable driver 9 if required to thereby null
the output voltages V(t) of the pendulous
accelerometers.
For less demanding applications, a single-stage,
two-DOF tilt table, as illustrated in Figure 2, may
provide a simpler, less expensive alternative. The ~ -
disturbances sensed by sensor 10 mounted on table 11 are ~ ~-
applied to a feedback controller 12 or 13 or both.
Coarse deviations may be compensated by a servo-motor 14
through a suitable driver 15 while fine deviations of ~-~
the order of 10 nano-radians may be compensated by a PZT
16.

,~ l U ~~L l 7 9
.
'! 7
i On a seismic isolation table, where compensating
tilts may be limited to several micro-radians, a PZT (or
EST or MST) stage only can be used.
Figure 3 is a two-stage stabilized platform
~ 5 configuration such as shown in Figure 1 wherein stage 2
¦ additionally includes a x,y,z vibration isolation stage
' which is part of the tilt table. In this embodiment
high fre~uency low-amplitude vibrations can be
attenuated with x,y,z translation devices such as piezo- - -
electric (PZT) devices 4, 16, 17 working in closed loop
with a suitable triaxial vibration sensor 18.
The configuration shown in Figure 3 can accommodate
five degrees of freedom. The sixth degree (yaw
compensation) is not shown but can be added using the
same technique.
A Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) feedback
control is preferably used to stabilize the table as a
function of the pendulum output where:
e = KpV + Kd V + Ki ¦ Vdt +Vn
where e = voltage applied to the PZT
Kp = proportional control gain
Ki = integral control gain
Kd = derivative control gain
Vn = electronic noise
If the tilt assembly is critically damped (i.e. no
control induced oscillations) then the gains of each

r~ 9
:. 8
: control component are related such that:
~:,
K2p - 4 KdKi > 0
and ~c = Ki/Kp < 0.1 Hz
such that integral control is used effectively where it
is needed most (in this case for frequencies ~c less
than 0.1 Hz).
, All modes of PID control are needed because:
`. 1) Proportional: is usually needed with integral and
derivative control.
~, 10 2) Integral: is required for reducing the steady
state tilt angle in the feedback
~, loop because tilt frecluencies close
`~ to DC require a high gain.
3) Derivative: for decreasing the feedback response
j 15 time at high frequencies as well as
applying a phase-lead control.
Although the invention has been disclosed, by way
of example, with reference to preferred embodiments, it :~
is to be understood that it is not limited to such
embodiments and that other alternatives are also
envisaged within the scope of the following claims: ~-~

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 1998-08-17
Application Not Reinstated by Deadline 1998-08-17
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 1997-08-18
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 1995-02-17
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 1993-08-16
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 1993-08-16

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
1997-08-18
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
NORANDA INC.
CANAGRAV RESEARCH LTD.
Past Owners on Record
JERRY R. PANENKA
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column (Temporarily unavailable). To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Cover Page 1995-02-16 1 31
Abstract 1995-02-16 1 27
Claims 1995-02-16 3 120
Drawings 1995-02-16 3 85
Descriptions 1995-02-16 8 325
Representative drawing 1998-05-10 1 12
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Maintenance Fee) 1997-09-30 1 188
Fees 1996-08-05 1 31
Fees 1995-07-16 1 44
Examiner Requisition 1994-07-20 2 68
Courtesy - Office Letter 1996-07-24 1 18
PCT Correspondence 1996-04-11 3 70
PCT Correspondence 1996-01-25 1 26
Courtesy - Office Letter 1996-07-24 1 15
Courtesy - Office Letter 1994-04-10 1 29
Courtesy - Office Letter 1996-02-29 2 18
Examiner Requisition 1996-10-24 2 84
Prosecution correspondence 1994-11-17 2 35
Prosecution correspondence 1997-04-22 5 228