Language selection

Search

Patent 2105132 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2105132
(54) English Title: SUBSTITUTED 1, 2, 4-TRIAZOLE CONTAINING LUBRICANTS HAVING IMPROVED OXIDATION STABILITY
(54) French Title: 1, 2,4-TRIAZOLE SUBSTITUE CONTENANT DES LUBRIFIANTS POSSEDANT UNE MEILLEURE STABILITE A L'OXYDATION
Status: Dead
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C10M 133/12 (2006.01)
  • C09K 15/18 (2006.01)
  • C10M 133/44 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • FRANKENFELD, JOHN W. (United States of America)
  • KATRITZKY, ALAN R. (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • EXXON RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY (United States of America)
(71) Applicants :
(74) Agent: BORDEN LADNER GERVAIS LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(22) Filed Date: 1993-08-30
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 1994-03-29
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
952,035 United States of America 1992-09-28

Abstracts

English Abstract


- 14 -
ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE

The addition of substituted 1,2,4-triazole compounds to a
lubricant imparts improved oxidation stability to the lubricant. The
oxidation stability is particularly enhanced when the substituent
contains an aromatic moiety such as benzene or a substituted benzene
ring.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


- 12 -

THE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION IN WHICH AN EXCLUSIVE
PROPERTY OR PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:

1. A lubricant composition comprising a major amount of a
lubricating base oil and a minor amount of an additive having the
formula:


Image



wherein R1 is hydrogen and R2 is an aromatic moiety.

2. The composition of claim 1 wherein the aromatic moiety is
anthrancenyl, naphthyl, phenanthryl, phenyl, or their substituted
analogs.

3. The composition of claim 2 wherein the aromatic moiety is
a substituted analog of naphthyl or phenyl.

4. A lubricant composition comprising a major amount of a
lubricating base oil and a minor amount of an additive having the
formula:


Image



wherein R1 is hydrogen and R2 is Image wherein R3 is hydrogen, an
alkyl group containing from 1 to 10 carbon atoms, or a radical

- 13 -

selected from the group consisting of -OR4 or NR5R6 in which R4, R5,
and R6 are hydrogen or an alkyl group containing from 1 to 4 carbon
atoms.

5. The composition of claim 4 wherein R3 is hydrogen.

6. The composition of claim 5 wherein R3 is alkyl group
containing from 1 to 4 carbon atoms.

7. The composition of claim 6 wherein R3 is a methyl group.

8. The composition of claim 7 wherein the methyl group is in
the para position relative to the nitrogen atom.

9. The composition of claim 7 wherein the methyl group is in
the meta position relative to the nitrogen atom.

10. The composition of claim 4 wherein R4, R5, and R6 are
each a methyl group.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


21~3~1 32
-- 1 --

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

Thi0 invention concerns lubricating compo~itions having
improved oxidation stability due to the presence of a substituted
1,2,4-triazole compound.

2. Description of Related Art

Oxidation stability is an important requirement for all
lubricants, including automotive lubricating oils, indu~trial oils,
and grea~es. The major cause of oxidative instability is the auto-
oxidative breakdown of hydrocarbons in the lubricant~ and the concomi-
tant formation of acids and other undesirable oxygenated species,
including sludge. Auto-oxidative breakdown i9 strongly catalyzed by
traces of metal ions (especially copper and iron) which become solu-
bilized when the lubricant contaat~ a metal surface. One way to
control auto-oxidation is to add one or more metal deactivators to the
lubricant. In general, these deactivators prevent such undesirable
catalytLc reactions from occurring in two different way~: The metal
deactivators form impervious films on the metal surface, thereby
preventing dissolution of the metal ions (these are called "film
forming metal passivators~ or the metal deactivators form complexe~
with solublized metal ions, thus rendering them inactive as catalysts
~these are called "301uble metal deactivators~
: '
The use of substituted 1,2,4-triazoles in various composi-
tions i~ known. For example, U.S. Patent 4,734,209 disclo3ec the use
of certain N-substituted 1,2,4-triazoles as metal deactivators in
functional fluids. See al~o V.S. Patents 3,647,814 and 3,663,436.
~ .
However, these patents (the di~clo~ures all of which are
incorporated herein by reference) do not disclose the particular
sub~tituted 1,2,4-tria~ole containing lubriaant compositions described
hereafter.



.

2 ~ 2
-- 2

SUMMARY OF T~E INVENTION

This invention concerns lubricant compositions containing
oxidation reducing amounts of certain triazoles. More specifically,
we have discovered that the oxidation stability of a lubricant can be
improved when the lubricant contains a minor amount of a substituted
1,2,4-triazole having structure I shown below:
N C
Il 11 . ..
C N
N / R1 (I)
CH2 N
R2




wherein R1 is ~ and R2 is an aromatic moiety. Preferably, R2 is an
aromatic moiety such as benzene or a substituted benzene ring.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

In general, the lubricants of this invention will comprise a
major amount of a lubricating oil basestock (or base oil or oil of
lubricating vi3cosity) and a minor amount of the substituted 1,2,4-
triazole additive~ having istructure I above.

The lubricating oil basestock can be derived from natural
lubricating oils, synthetic lubricating oils, or mi~tures thereof. In
general, the lubricating oil basestock will have a kinematic viscosity
ranging from about 5 to about 10,000 cSt at 40C, although typical
applications will reguire an oil having a viscosity ranging from ahout
10 to about 1,000 cSt at 40C.

Natural lubricating oils include animal oils, vegetable oils
(e.g., castor oil and lard oil), petroleum oils, mineral oil~, and
oils derived from coal or shale.

2 ~ 2


Synthetic oils include hydrocarbon oils and halo-substituted
hydrocarbon oils ~uch as polym~rized and interpolymerized olefins
~e.~. polybutylenes, polypropylene~, propylene-isobutylene copolymers,
chlorinated polybutylenes, poly(1-hexenes), poly(1-octene~)~ poly(l-
decenes), etc., and mixture~ thereof); alkylbenzenes (e.~. dodecyl-
benzene~, tetradecylbenzeneq, dinonylbenzenes, di(2-ethylhexyl)-
benzene, etc.); polyphenyls (e.q. biphenyls, terphenyls, alkylated
polyphenyls, etc.); alkylated diphenyl ethers, alkylated diphenyl
sulfides, a~ well as their derivativ~s, analogs, and homolog~ thereof;
and the like.

Synthetic lubricating oil~ also include alkylene oxide
polymers, inter~olymers, copolymers and derivatives thereof wherein
the terminal hydroxyl groups have been modified by e~terification,
etherification, etc. Thi~ class of synthetic oils is exemplified by
polyoxyalkylene polymers prepared by polymerization of ethylene oxide
or propylene oxide; the alkyl and aryl ethers of these polyoxyalkylene
polymers (e.g., methyl-polyiqopropylene glycol ether having an average
molecular weight of 1000, diphenyl ether of polyethylene glycol having
a molecular weight of 500-1000, diethyl ether of polypropylene glycol
having a molecular weight of 1000-1500); and mono- and polycarboxylic
ssters thereof (e.~., the acetic acid esters, mixed C3-Cg fatty acid
e~ters, and C13 oxo acid diester of tetraethylene glycol).

Another suitable class of synthetic lubricating oils com-
prise~ the ester~ of dicarboxylic acids (e.g., phthalic acid, succinic
acid, alkyl succinic acids and alkenyl succinic acid~, maleic acid,
azelaic acid, quberic acid, sebasic acid, fumaric acid, adipic acid,
linoleic acld dlmer, malonic acid, alkylmalonic acids, alkenyl malonic
acids, etc.j with a variety of alcohols (e.~., butyl alcohol, hexyl
alcohol, dodecyl alcohol, 2-ethylhexyl alcohol, ethylene glycol, di-
ethylene glycol monoether, propyl ne glycol, etc.). Specific examples
of thesa esters include dibutyl adipate, di(2-ethylhexyl) sebacate,
di-n-hexyl fumarate, dioctyl sebacate, diisooctyl azelate, dilsodecyl
azelate, dioctyl phthalate, didecyl phthalate, dieicosyl sebacate, the
2-ethylhexyl diester of linoleic acid dimer, and the complex e~ter

~ : '

`- 2 ~ 3 ~
_ 4 _

formed by reacting one mole of sebacic acid with two moles of tetra-
ethylene glycol and two moles of 2-ethylhexanoic acid, and the like.

Esters useful as synthetic oils also include those ~ade from
Cs to C12 monocarboxylic acids and polyols and polyol ethers such as
neopentyl glycol, trimethylolpropane, pentaerythritol, dipentaerythri-
tol, tripentaerythritol, and the like.

Silicon-based oils (such as the polyakyl-, polyaryl~, poly-
alkoxy-, or polyaryloxy-siloxane oils and silicate oils) comprise
another useful class of synthetic lubricating oils. These oils
include tetraethyl silicate, tetraisopropyl silicate, tetra-~2-ethyl-
hexyl) silicate, tetra-(4-methyl-2-ethylhexyl) silicate, tetra(p-tert-
butylphenyl) silicate, hexa-(4-methyl-2-pentoxy)-disiloxane, poly-
(methyl)-siloxanes and poly(methylphenyl) siloxanes, and the like.
Other synthetic lubricating oils include liguid esters of phosphorus-
containing acids (e.~., tricresyl phosphate, trioctyl phosphate,
diethyl ester of decylphosphonic acid), polymeric tetrahydrofurans,
polyalphaolefins, and the like.
:'
The lubricating base oil may be derived from unrefined,
refined, rerefined oils, or mixtures thereof. Unrefined oils are
obtained directly from a natural source or synthetic source (e.~.,
coal, shale, or tar sands bitumen) without further purification or
treatment. Examples of unrefined oil3 include a shale oil ob-tained
directly rom a retorting operation, a petroleum oil obtained directly
from distillation, or an ester oil obtained directly from an esteri-
fication procss~, each of which is then used without further treat-
ment. Refined oil~ are similar to the unrefined oils except that
refined oils have been treated in one or more purification steps to
improve ona or more propertie3. Suitable purification techniques
include distillation, hydrotreating, dewaxing, solvent extraction,
acid or ba~ extraction, filtration, and percolation, all of which are
known to those skilled in the art. Rerefined oils are obtained by
treating refined oils in processes similar to those used to obtain the
refined oils. These rerefined oils are also known as reclaimed or
:, '




- : :~. -. - ., , , , ,' : .

2 1 ~ 2


reprocessed oils and often are additionally processed by techniques
for removal of spent additives and oil breakdown products.

The aromatic substituted triazole additives of this invention
have structure ~I) shown above where R1 and R2 are defined as above.
Suitable aromatic moieties include anthrancenyl, naphthyl, phenan-
thryl, phenyl, their substituted analogs, and the like. Substituted
analogs of naphthyl and phenyl are preferred, with substituted phenyl
having the structure
R3
~ being more preferred, wherein R3 i9 hydrogen, an alkyl group
having from 1 to 10 carbon atoms, or a radical selected from the group
consisting of -OR4 or -NR5R6, where R4, R5, and R6 are hydrogen or an
alkyl group containing from 1 to 4 carbon atoms. R4, R5, and R6 may
be the same or different, and preferably are all methyl. Pref~rably,
R3 i9 hydrogen or an alkyl group of from 1 to 4 carbon atoms, with the
alkyl group in the meta or para position relative to the nitrogen
atom. Most preferably, R3 i9 methyl. The triazole additives of this
invention should be oil soluble.

Compounds having structure I can be prepared, for eiiample, by
reactlng 1,2,4-triazole, formaldehyde, and an amine in an aqueous
medium or in various solvents (e.~. ethanol, methanol, benzene, or
toluene). Approximately equimolar amounts of 1,2,4-triazole and
aromatic amine are mixed in a solvent provided that care i9 taken to
avoid an excess of the 1,2,4-triazole. Formaldehyd~ (commercially
available in aqueous solution with a polymerization inhibltor) i5 then
added to the triazole/amine mixture. After completion of the reac-
t$on, solvent is removed leaving a substituted 1,2,4-triazole of the
structure (I). It is important to follow the sequence of mixing
reactants set forth above. I~ these precautions are not taken, a
N,N-bis 1,2,4-triazolyl derivative will result. Furthermore, if an
alkyl amine i9 used a~ a reactant in place of an aromatic amine, the
N,N-bis 1,2,4-triazolyl compound will be obtained without regard to
the order of addition oi reactants, e.g.,

;:,


.-.



:, . , .. . : . , , . . , , .; . .. ... . , . . . , ., , ., : , .:, .. . .
. , : : .. : .: : . :. .: . : .: . . . . ... : ; : : :,: . . .: . : . :

2 1 ~ 2
-- 6 --

HC - N
Il 11 . '
N - CH NCH N CH
ll il HCHO 11 ¦¦ \ /
2 HC N + C2H5NH2 --------> HC N N
\
N N CH2
H
CH2 - N
C2H5
The amount of substituted 1,2,4-triazoles added to the
lubricant compositions of this invention need only be an amount
3ufficient to increaqe the auto-oxidative stability of the lubricant
relative that obtained in the absence of the additive. In general,
the amount of additive can range from about 0.01 up to about 5 weight~
or more ~based on the total weight of the composition), depending upon
the specific application of the lubricant. Typically, however, from
about 0.01 to about 2 wt.% of the additive will be used to ensure
solubility of the additive and for economic consideration~. Prefera-
bly, the amount of additive used will range from about 0.01 to abcut
1, more preferably from about 0.02 to about 0.2, wt~.

Other additives may be present in the lubricant compositions
of this invention a3 well, depending upon the intended use of the
composition. Examples of other additives include ash-free detergents,
disper~ants, corrosion preventing agcnts, other antioxidants, pour-
point depreasants, extreme pressure agents, viscosity improvers,
~colosants, anti~oamer~, and the li~e.

Lubricants containing the substituted 1,2,4-triazol'e addi-
tives of this Lnvention can be used in essentially any application
requiring a lubricant having good oxidation stability. Thus, as u~ed
herein, "lubricant" (or "lubricant compo3ition") i meant to include
automotive lubrlcating oils, industrial oils, grea3es, and the like.
For example, the lubricant compositiona of this invention can be u~ed
in the lubrication ~ystem of essentially any internal combustion
engine, including automobile and truck engines, two-~ycle~ engine~,
aviation piston engines, marine and railroad engine~, and the like.

,."' '

1 3 2
-- 7 --

~lso contemplated are lubricants for gas-fired engines, alcohol (e.g.
methanol) powered engines, stationary powered engine~, turbines, and
the like.

However, the lubricant composition_ of this invention are
particularly useful in industrial oils such a3 turbine oils, gear
oils, compre_sor oils, hydraulic fluids, spindle oil~, high speed
lubricating oils, process oils, heat transfer oils, refrigeration
oils, metalworking fluid~, and the like.

This invention will be further understood by referencP to the
following examples, which include preferred embodiments of this
invention, but which are not intended to restrict the scope of the
claim~. In Examples 1-3, various substi~uted 1,2,4-triazole compoundq
were added to sampie~ of a lubricating oil. Preparation of the
substituted triazole~ is given below. Several different oxidation
tests were then performed on the samples to determine their oxidation
stability. Unless otherwise stated, the lubricating oil used in
Examples 1-2 was a partially formulated lubricating oil consisting of
a Solvent 150 Neutral base oil containing 0.04 wt.% of a rust inhibi-
tor and 0.2 wt.% of a phenolic antioxidant. The sub~tituted triazole
compounds tested included various aromatic sub~tituted 1,2,4-triazole
additives having ~tructure I and a commercially available additive,
which is believed to have structure II shown below (l-di-2-ethylhe~
aminomethyltriazole):
N C
Il 11
C N C2H5
\ / I
N C-C-C-C-C-C (II)
C~l2 N l2H5
C--C--C--C--C--C

IC2H5
wherein R1 and R2 are each C-C-C-C-C-C.

2 1 U ~7 ~ 3 ~

Preparative Example A

0.08 mmoles of 1,2,4-triazole and 0.08 mmoles o~ 4-butyl-
aniline are added to 30 ml of methanol. 6 ml of a 37% solution of
formaldahyde (0.08 moles) is then added and the reaction mixture
allowed to stand overnight. Methanol was removed by distillation and
product having ~tructure (I) wherein R2 is ~ C4Hg was isolated.

Pre~arative Examole B

0.3 moles of 1,2,4-triazole and 0.3 moles of p-toluidine were
added to methanol and stirred until the reactants dissolved. 0.3
moles formaldehyde (as 37% solution) was added and ths reaction
mixture ~tirred for several hours. Upon removal of methanol, a
product having structure (I) wherein R2 is ~ CH3 waB isolated.

In Examples 1-3, one or more of the following tsst~ were
performed to determine the oxidation stability of several lùbricant
formulation3 containing the various additives.

CIGRE ~IP 280) OxLdation Test
: '~
The CIGRE test measures the ability of an additive to deacti-
vate soluble copper and iron. In this tes'c, the oil i9 oxidized at
120C for 164 hours in the presence of a catalyst containing soluble
copper naphthenate and soluble iron naphthenate. An oxygen flow rate
: .
of 1 liter/hr i3 maintained during the test. The Total Acid Number
(TAN) and the weight percent sludge produced during the test were
.
determined and used to calcuIate the Total Oxidation Products (TOP~
using the following equation:

TOP = 3 + wt. ~ sludge
:
Lower TOP values indicate greater oxidation stability.

-- -- . . .


Rotarv Bomb Oxidation Test ~BOT)

This test i~ described in ASTM D2272 and measures the effec-
tiveness of an additive to deactivate a solid copper catalyst. In
this test, the oil i8 oxidi~ed in the presence of a copper wire
catalyst and water. The ~life~ of the test oil is the time requirsd
for the oil to r~act with a given amount of oxygen. The longer the
"life", the More stable the oil formulation (l.e. the more effective
the antioxidant).

Universal Oxidation Test ~UOT)

This is a high temperature oxidation test de~igned to deter-
mine the effectiveness of additives to deactivate a mixture of solid
copper and iron catalysts. Air i3 blown through the oil at a rate of
3.0 liters/hr and at a temperature of 135C. A water condenser is
employed to condense volatile products. The effectiveness of the
antioxidant is determined by measuring the time required for the acid
titre of the oil to increase by 0.5 neutralization number (mg ROH/g
oil). The longer the life, the more effective the antioxidant.

E~ample 1 - CIGRE Tests on the Partially Fo~mulated Oil

CIGRE tests were performed on several samples of the par-
tially formulated oil to which variou3 1,2,4-triazole compounds had
been added. The initial concentration of each additive in thi3
example (and in Examples 2 and 3) was about 2 x 10-4 moles/100 g oil
to ensure that the additives were tested on a equal molar basis. As
such, the wt.~ of the additives in the tables will vary with the
molecular weight of the additive. The results of these test~ are
shown in Table 1 below.




, . ,, .-

.. . . .

210~132
-- 10 --

TABLE 1
Wt. ~ CIGRE TOP
Additive Additive Rl R2 (ll
None 0 -- -- 4.0
Structure I 0.05 H ~ -C4H9 0.72
Structure II 0.08 (2) (2) 3.6

(1) An average o~ two to four run~.
IC2H5
(2) C-C-C-C-C-C-

Example 2 - RBOT and UOT Tests on the Partially
Formulated Oil

RBOT and UOT tests were performed on ~everal formulations
similar to those tested in Example l, except that the additives were
tested on a equal weight rather than equal molar basis. The re~ults
of these test~ are 3hown in Table 2 below.

TABLE 2
Wt. % RBOT Life UOT Life
Additive Additive R1 R2 ~Minl (1) ~Hrl (1)
Nonç 0 -- -- 127 45
Structure II 0.08 (2) (2) 315 158
Structure I 0.08 ~ - ~ -C4Hg 369 835
Structure I 0.08 H ~ 375 985
Structure I 0.08 H - ~ -CH3 420 920
(1) An average of two to 9iX runs.
f2H5




(2) C-C-C-C-C-C-




'. ' ~ '',, ; .~ ' '. ' ' '' , ~. '

-~ 2~i3~
-- 11 --

Exam~le 3 - RBOT and UOT Tests on Fully Formulated Oil

~ OBT and UOT Tests were performed on a Eully formulated oil
containing (in addition to an additive of thi~ invention) a rust
inhibitor, a phenolic antioxidant, a flow improver, an amine anti-
oxidant, and a pour depressant. The results of these tests are shown
in Table 3 below.

TABLE 3
Wt. % RBOT Life U~T Life
Additive Additive Rl R2 (Min) tl) IHr) (1
Structure II 0.0~ (~) (2) 730 423
Structure I 0.08 H - ~ -C4Hg 760 799
Structure I 0.08 H ~ 490 670
Structure I 0.08 H - ~ -CH3 -- 738
(1) An average of two runs.
I2H5 ~ : :
(2) C-C-C-C-C~C-
~ '
The data in Tables 1 and 2 show that the additives of this
invention impart oxidation stability to lubricant formulations that do
not contain such additives. The data in Table 1 also show that
formulations containing the 1,2,4-triazole compounds of this invention
impart equivalent improvement in oxidation stability as a commercially
available additive, but at a lower concentration. Further, the data
in Tables 2 and 3 show that the formulations containing the 1,2,4-
triazole compounds of this invention have greater oxidation stability
than formulation~ containing commercially available additives at the
same concentration.




.




- .. ., :, . . . ,, . ~ , ,: " :. . :. , ;. . :, : :: ~ : . : . :

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date Unavailable
(22) Filed 1993-08-30
(41) Open to Public Inspection 1994-03-29
Dead Application 1997-09-02

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
1996-08-30 FAILURE TO PAY APPLICATION MAINTENANCE FEE

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Application Fee $0.00 1993-08-30
Registration of a document - section 124 $0.00 1994-03-04
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 2 1995-08-30 $100.00 1995-06-07
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
EXXON RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY
Past Owners on Record
FRANKENFELD, JOHN W.
KATRITZKY, ALAN R.
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Representative Drawing 1998-08-06 1 1
Drawings 1994-03-29 1 15
Claims 1994-03-29 2 70
Abstract 1994-03-29 1 26
Cover Page 1994-03-29 1 41
Description 1994-03-29 11 545
Fees 1995-06-07 1 35