Language selection

Search

Patent 2110221 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2110221
(54) English Title: REINFORCEMENT SYSTEM FOR MASTIC INTUMESCENT FIRE PROTECTION COATINGS
(54) French Title: SYSTEME DE RENFORCEMENT POUR REVETEMENTS PARE-FEU INTUMESCENTS EN MASTIC
Status: Expired
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • E04B 1/94 (2006.01)
  • E04D 13/00 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • BOYD, GEORGE P., JR. (United States of America)
  • CASTLE, GEORGE K. (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • AKZO NOBEL NV (Netherlands (Kingdom of the))
(71) Applicants :
(74) Agent: RIDOUT & MAYBEE LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 1998-09-29
(22) Filed Date: 1993-11-29
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 1994-08-27
Examination requested: 1994-12-02
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
08/023,812 United States of America 1993-02-26

Abstracts

English Abstract



A reinforcement system for mastic intumescent fire
protection coatings. Free floating hybrid mesh embedded in the
coating is used to reinforce the coating. The hybrid mesh is
made from a combination of high temperature and low temperature
yarns.


French Abstract

L'invention concerne un système de renfort pour revêtements intumescents de protection incendie en mastic. Un filet hybride en flottement libre, encastré dans le revêtement, est utilisé pour renforcer celui-ci. Le filet hybride est formé à partir d'une combinaison de fils haute température et basse température.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


THE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION IN WHICH AN EXCLUSIVE
PROPERTY OR PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
1. A mesh fabric comprising:
a) a first plurality of fibers retaining in excess of
80% of their room temperature tensile strength at
343°C running in the warp and weft directions
defining major cells bounded by the first plurality
of fibers and having major dimensions, with corners
spaced apart in each direction by less than four
inches; and
b) a second plurality of fibers which retain less than
80% of their room temperature tensile strength at
343°C intermeshed with the first plurality of fibers
to define minor cells having minor dimensions, with
corners spaced apart in each direction by less than
two inches, each said major cell being filled with
said minor cells, to provide a mesh fabric having
appropriate handleability properties and sufficient
tensile strength at 343°C for use as a reinforcement
system for mastic fire protection coatings.

2. The fabric of claim 1 where the first plurality of
fibers comprises carbon fibers.

3. The fabric of claim 2 wherein the second plurality of
fibers comprises glass fibers.

4. The fabric of claim 1 wherein the major cells have
corners spaced apart by more than 1/4".

5. The fabric of claim 1 wherein the first plurality of


fibers comprises ceramic fibers.

6. The fabric of claim 1 wherein a portion of the first
plurality of fibers has a serpentine pattern in the warp
direction, which allows the mesh to be stretched in said
direction.

7. The fabric of claim 6 wherein a portion of the second
plurality of fibers is knitted.

8. In a substrate coated with a fire protective material, a
mesh embedded in the fire protective material
comprising:
a) a first plurality of fibers which retain in excess
of 80% of their room temperature tensile strength at
temperatures above 343°C; and
b) a second plurality of fibers which lose greater than
20% of their room temperature tensile strength at
temperatures above 343°C, said second plurality of
fibers being interwoven with the first plurality of
fibers.

9. The substrate of claim 8 wherein the fire protective
coating is selected from the group containing
intumescent coatings, subliming coatings and ablative
coatings.

10. The substrate of claim 8 additionally comprising an edge
coated with fire protecting material and wherein the mesh
stretches in a first direction and the mesh is disposed
with the first direction perpendicular to the edge.
16


11. The substrate of claim 10 wherein a portion of the first
plurality of fibers are serpentine and run in the first
direction.



12. The substrate of claim 11 wherein the first plurality of
fibers comprises carbon fibers.



13. The substrate of claim 12 wherein the second plurality of
fibers comprises glass fiber.



14. The substrate of claim 8 wherein the first plurality of
fibers comprises carbon fibers.



15. The substrate of claim 14 wherein the second plurality of
fibers comprises glass fibers.



16. The substrate of claim 15 wherein the first plurality of
fibers define major cells having corners of adjacent squares
are spaced apart less than 4 inches.




17. The substrate of claim 16 wherein the second plurality of
fibers divides the major cells into a plurality of minor
cells.



18. A method of protecting a structural member against fire
comprising the steps of :

17


a) applying a layer of self-adhering fire protective
material to the substrate.
b) embedding in the fire protective material a mesh
comprising interwoven high temperature fibers and low
temperature fibers; and
c) applying a second layer of fire protective material
over the mesh.



19. The method of claim 18 wherein the high temperature fibers
comprises carbon fibers.



20. The method of claim 19 wherein the mesh expands in a first
direction and the step of embedding comprises aligning the
mesh with the first direction perpendicular to an edge of
the structural member.
18

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


2110221
Case 1025CIP GB117000576

REINFORCEMENT 8YSTEM FOR MASTIC INTUME8CENT FIRE PROTECTION
COATINGS



This invention relates generally to mastic fire protection
coatings and more particularly to reinforcement systems for such
coatings.
Mastic fire protection coatings are used to protect
structures from fire. One widespread use is in hydrocarbon
processing facilities, such as chemical plants, offshore oil and
gas platforms and refineries. Such coatings are also used around
hydrocarbon storage facilities such as LPG (liquified petroleum
gas) tanks.
The coating is often applied to structural steel elements
and acts as an insulating layer. In a fire, the coating retards
the temperature rise in the steel to give extra time for the fire
to be extinguished or the structure evacuated. Otherwise, the
steel might rapidly heat and collapse.
Mastic coatings are made with a binder such as epoxy or
'0 vinyl. Various additives are included in the binder to give the
coating the desired fire protective properties. The binder
adheres to the steel.
One particularly useful class of mastic fire protective
coatings is termed "intumescent". Intumescent coatings swell up
'5 when exposed to the heat of a fire and convert to a foam-like

21 10221
char. The foam-like char has a low thermal conductivity and
insulates the substrate. Intumescent coatings are sometimes also
calIed "ablative" or "subliming" coatings.
Though the mastic coatings adhere well to most substrates,
it is known to embed mesh in the coatings. The mesh is
mechanically attached to the substrate. U.S. patents 3,913,290
and 4,069,075 to Castle et al. describe the use of mesh. In
those patents, the mesh is described as reinforcing the char once
it forms in a fire. More specifically, the mesh reduces the
chance that the coating will crack or "fissure". Fissures reduce
the protection provided by the coating because they allow heat to
more easily reach the substrate. When fissures in the material
do occur, they are not as deep when mesh is used. As a result,
the mastic does not need to be applied as thickly. Glass cloth
has also been used to reinforce fire protective mastics. U.S.
3,915,777 describes such a system. Glass, however, softens at
temperatures to which the coating might be exposed. Once the
glass softens, it provides no benefits. Though the glass is
partially insulated by the fire protective coating, we have
recognized that intumescent systems also often contain boron or
other materials which are glass fluxing agents. The fluxing
agents lower the softening point of the glass reinforcement. As
a result, the glass does not provide adequate reinforcement in
some fire situations to which the material might be exposed.
Examples of two widely used types of glass fibers are E-
glass and S-glass sold by Owens-Corning. E-glass loses 25% of

2~ 10221
its tensile strength when heated 343~C. S-glass, while
slightly stronger, loses 20~ of its tensile strength at the
same temperature. When heated to temperatures of 732~C and
849~C, E-glass and S-glass, respectively, have softened
appreciably and by 877~C and 970~C, E-glass and S-glass
respectively, have softened so much that fibers made of
these materials cannot support their own weight. These low
softening temperatures are a drawback of using glass
reinforcement.
Use of mesh in conjunction with mastic coatings has
been criticized because it increases the cost of applying
the material. It would be desirable to obtain the benefits
of mechanically attached wire mesh without as much added
cost.

- -

2110221

SUMMARY OF THE lNv~,.llON
With the foregoing background in mind, it is an object to
provide a fire protection coating system with relatively low
manufacturing cost, low installation cost and good fire
protection.
The foregoing and other objects are achieved with a mesh
made of a combination of fibers. Non-melting, non-flammable,
flexible fibers with a high softening point are interwoven with
fibers with a relatively low softening point.


2110221


BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DR~WINGS
The invention will be better understood by referenee to the
following more detailed description and accompanying drawings in
which:
FIG. 1 shows a eoating with yarn mesh embedded in it; and
FIG. 2 is a sketch of a hybrid woven mesh according to an
embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 3 is a sketeh of a hybrid knitted mesh aeeording to an
embodiment of the invention; and
FIG. 4 is a sketeh of a eoated beam with a hybrid mesh
aeeording to an embodiment of the invention.

2 ~ 1 0 2 2 1

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
FIG. 1 shows a column 100 such as might be used for
structural steel in a hydrocarbon processing facility. A
column is illustrated. However, the invention applies to
beams, joists, tubes or other types of structural members
or other surfaces, such as walls, floors, decks and
bulkheads, which need to be protected from fire. Coating
102 is applied to the exposed surfaces of column 100.
Coating 102 is a known mastic intumescent fire protection
coating. Chartek~ coating available from Textron Specialty
Materials in Lowell, MA USA is an example of one of many
suitable coatings.
Coating 102 has a hybrid mesh 104 embedded in it.
Hybrid mesh 104 contains a flexible, noninflammable fibrous
material which maintains in excess of 80~ of its room
temperature tensile strength at temperatures in excess of
343~C. Preferably, the fibrous material retains in excess
of 80~ of its room temperature strength as temperatures
above 849~C and more preferably above 1200~C. Examples of
suitable fibrous materials are carbon, boron and graphite
fibers. Fibers containing carbides, such as silicon carbide
or titanium carbide; borides, such as titanium diborides;
oxides, such as alumina or silica; or ceramic might be
used. The fibers can be used in the form of monofilaments,
multifilaments, tows or yarns. If yarns are used, they may
be either continuous filament yarns or discontinuous
filament yarns such as stretch broken or spun yarn. Herein-
after, such materials are referred to generally as "high
temperature fiber". Such high temperature fibers offer

2110~21

the advantage of being light and flexible in comparison to welded
wire mesh. In addition, they do not burn, melt or corrode and
withstand many environmental effects.
Carbon yarn is the preferred high temperature fiber. Carbon
yarns are generally made from either PAN (poly acrylic nitride)
fiber or pitch fiber. The PAN or pitch is then slowly heated in
the presence of oxygen to a relatively low temperature, around
450~F. This slow heating process produces what is termed an
"oxidized fiber". Whereas the PAN and pitch fibers are
0 relatively flammable and lose their strength relatively quickly
at elevated temperatures, the oxidized fiber is relatively
nonflammable and is relatively inert at temperatures up to 300~F.
At higher temperatures, the oxidized fiber may lose weight, but
is acceptable for use in some fire protective coatings in some
fire environments. Oxidized fiber is preferably at least 60%
carbon.
Carbon fiber is made from the oxidized fiber by a second
heat treating cycle according to known manufacturing techniques.
This second heat treating step will not be necessary in some
0 cases since equivalent heat treatment may occur in a fire. After
heat treating, the fiber contains preferably in excess of 95%
carbon, more preferably in excess of 99%. The carbon fiber is
lighter, stronger and more resistant to heat or flame than the
precursor materials. The carbon is, however, more expensive due
to the added processing required. Carbon fiber loses only about
1~ of its weight per hour at 500~C in air. Embedded in a fire


21iO221

protection coating, it will degrade even less.
Hybrid mesh contains a low temperature fiber. The low
temperature fiber helps hold the high temperature fiber together
into a handleable mesh. We have discovered that more fibers are
needed to provide a handleable mesh than are needed to provide
adequate reinforcement in a fire. As a result, low temperature
fibers are interwoven with high temperature fibers. The low
temperature fibers are selected to be of relatively low cost and
to provide good handleability to the mesh. Examples of suitable
lo low temperature fibers are glass fibers, Kevlar fibers (trademark
of DuPont for aramid), mineral fibers, basalt, organic fibers, or
nylon, polyester or other synthetic fibers. Combinations of
fibers mights also be used.
Glass fibers are preferred. Such fibers are relatively low
cost and make a handleable material. Moreover, when hybrid mesh
is used in an intumescent coating, glass fibers have a high
enough softening temperature to provide some desirable effects
during the early stages of intumescence.
FIG. 2 shows the construction of a hybrid mesh 204. Here, a
lino weave is used. Fill yarns 206 are carbon yarn. Carbon fill
yarns 206 alternate with glass fill yarns 208. The warp yarns
are made by alternating glass yarns 210 and a combined glass and
carbon yarn 212.
The end result is an open fabric with a major cell having a
dimension Ml which is bounded by high temperature fiber. The
major cell is filled with minor cells having a dimension M2 which


2 ~ 2 2 1
is defined by low temperature fiber. Preferably, a dimension M
is below four inches, more preferably M~ will be below one inch
and most preferably approximately one half inch. The dimension
M2 is preferably less than two inches and more preferably below
one half inch. Most preferably M2 is approximately one quarter
inch. Mesh with these spacings provides adequate strength and
reduces fissuring when used in intumescent materials. The
spacing is large enough, though to allow easy incorporation into
a mastic coating.
In FIG. 2, hybrid mesh 204 is shown with major and minor
cells both being square. It is not, however, necessary that the
cells be square. The cells could be rectangular or of any shape
resulting from the construction of the mesh.
For example, in FIG. 3, a hybrid mesh 304 is shown with high
temperature warp fibers 312 which are not straight. As a result,
the major and minor cells are not rectangular.
The hybrid mesh 304 of FIG. 3 is a knitted mesh which
provides the advantages of easily expanding in the warp
direction, W. Expansion of the mesh is desirable when used an
reinforcement of intumescent fire protecting coatings. As the
coating intumesces, it pushes outwards as it expands to provide a
thick blanket of insulation. If the mesh expands, it will allow
the coating to intumesce more and therefore provide greater
insulation.
This added expansion is particularly important at edges or
on small diameter objects, such as pipes, where the expanded

2110221

coating has a greater surface area than the unexpanded coating.
Fissures are most likely to occur in the intumescent coating at
these places. To achieve full benefit from an expandable mesh,
though, it is necessary that hybrid mesh 304 be oriented with
S warp direction, W, perpendicular or tangential to the direction
of expansion. In FIG. 1, for example, the warp direction W is
shown to be around the flange edges of column 100. In this way,
as the radius of the coating around the flange edges increases in
a fire, the mesh reinforcement will increase also. As a result,
less fissuring of the intumescent coating on the flange edges is
likely.
A second advantage of an expandable mesh is that less
intumescent fire protective material is needed. We have observed
that with the use of mesh, when fissures do occur, they are not
as deep. In general, the fissure does not penetrate into the
coating any deeper than the mesh. With expandable mesh, the mesh
moves further from the substrate as the material intumesces. As
a result, a thicker insulating material is between the mesh and
the substrate. Thus, when fissures form, down to the mesh, the
substrate is better insulated. This effect is particularly
important for thin coatings, say less that 0.35".
Returning now to FIG. 3, the construction of the hybrid mesh
is described in greater detail. Hybrid 304 is a fabric
characterized as a 2-bar marquisette with warp layin and weft
insertion. Amoco T-300 3,000 filament carbon yarn was used as
the high temperature fiber. Owens-Corning ECC150 glass yarn was



-- 2110221

used as the low temperature fiber. Warp carbon fibers 312 and
weft carbon fibers 314 define major cells which have corners
spaced apart 1/2" in each direction. Minor cells are defined by
warp glass yarn 316 and weft glass yarns 318. The glass yarns
5 make squares which are approximately 1/2" x 1/4". Since these
squares are offset by 1/4" from the squares formed by the carbon
yarns, they are bisected along the long axes by the weft carbon
yarns 314 to form two 1/4" x 1/4" minor cells.
Hybrid mesh 304 was made on a Raschel knitting machine
10 equipped with weft insertion. Stitches running in the warp
direction W are made by knitting two glass yarns in a pillar
stitch, four pillar stitches per inch. These stitches are spaced
apart 1/4". Every other pillar stitch 316B encompasses a single
carbon yarn 312.
The weft carbon fibers 314 are added by weft insertion. The
weft glass fibers 318 are produced by "laying in" every 1/2".
Laying in means that a yarn from one pillar is transferred to the
adjacent stitch.
Warp yarns 316B are not straight. The serpentine shape of
20 these fibers results from the fact that, due to the inclusion of
carbon yarn 312 in stitches 316B, the tension is different in
yarns 316A and 316B. This serpentine shape is desirable because
it allows the mesh to stretch.
Sizing may be used on the hybrid mesh to improve the
25 handleability of the mesh.
Returning to FIG. 1, column 100 is coated according to the

2110~1

following procedure. First, a layer of mastic intumescent coating
is applied to column 100. The mastic intumescent may be applied
by spraying, troweling or other convenient method. Before the
coating cures, the hybrid mesh 104 is rolled out over the
surface. It is desirable that mesh 104 be wrapped as one
continuous sheet around as many edges of column 100 as possible.
Mesh 104 is pressed into the coating with a trowel or roller
dipped in a solvent or by some other convenient means.
Thereafter, more mastic intumescent material is applied.
Coating 102 is then finished as a conventional coating. The
carbon mesh is thus "free floating" because it is not directly
mechanically attached to the substrate.



EXAMPLE I
A steel pipe of roughly 18"-circumference was coated with
8mm of intumescent fire proofing material. A hybrid mesh as
shown in FIG. 3 was embedded in the coating approximately 5mm
from the surface of the pipe. The pipe was placed in a 2,000~F
furnace.
After testing, the glass portions of the hybrid mesh were
not observable. The carbon portions of the hybrid mesh were
found approximately 9-lOmm from the surface of the pipe. The
circumference of the hybrid mesh had increased approximately 1
3/4" from approximately 18 1/3". Qualitatively, the coating was
observed to have less severe fissures than similar substrates
protected with intumescent fireproofing material reinforced with

2110221
metal mesh.
EXAMPLE II
A hybrid mesh as shown in FIG. 3 was embedded in a mastic
intumescent fire protective coating applied to a section of a
lOWF49 beam. The coating was applied at an average thickness of
5mm. The hybrid mesh was embedded 3mm from the surface at the
flange edges of the beam. When placed in a furnace which was
already heated to 2,000~F, the average temperature of the beam,
as measured by thermocouples embedded in the beam, was 1,000~F
after 48 minutes. For a second beam segment coated with 7mm of
fire protective material with the same type mesh, the time to
1,000~F was 63 minutes.
For comparison, a similarly tested beam without mesh reached
1,000~F after 30 minutes.
While not directly comparable, a lOWF49 column was coated
with 0.27 inches of intumescent fire protective material. Metal
mesh was embedded in the coating at the flange edges. The column
was placed in a furnace which was then heated to 2,000~F
according to the UL 1709 protocol. The column reached an average
temperature of 1,000~F after 60 minutes. If scaled to a
thickness of 5mm, this time is equivalent to only 44 minutes.
Turning now to FIG. 4, an alternative hybrid 404 mesh is
shown embedded in a fire protective coating 402. As shown, mesh
404 has carbon yarns 406 running in only one direction around
flange edges of a column. Carbon yarns 406 are held together by
low temperature fibers 408. In this way, the amount of high

211~221

temperature fibers is reduced.
Having described the invention, it will be apparent that
other embodiments might be constructed. Different types or
combinations of fibers might be used. The hybrid mesh as
S described herein might also be used to reinforce fire protective
coatings on a variety of substrates, such as beams, columns,
bulkheads, decks, pipes, tanks and ceilings. The invention
should, thus, be limited only by the spirit and scope of the
appended claims.




14

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date 1998-09-29
(22) Filed 1993-11-29
(41) Open to Public Inspection 1994-08-27
Examination Requested 1994-12-02
(45) Issued 1998-09-29
Expired 2013-11-29

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Application Fee $0.00 1993-11-29
Registration of a document - section 124 $0.00 1994-06-21
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 2 1995-11-29 $100.00 1995-10-23
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 3 1996-11-29 $100.00 1996-10-30
Registration of a document - section 124 $0.00 1996-11-14
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 1997-07-28
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 4 1997-12-01 $100.00 1997-11-19
Final Fee $300.00 1998-05-22
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 5 1998-11-30 $150.00 1998-11-18
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 6 1999-11-29 $150.00 1999-11-03
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 7 2000-11-29 $150.00 2000-11-02
Registration of a document - section 124 $50.00 2001-02-26
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 8 2001-11-29 $150.00 2001-11-01
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 9 2002-11-29 $150.00 2002-10-31
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 10 2003-12-01 $200.00 2003-11-03
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 11 2004-11-29 $250.00 2004-11-04
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 12 2005-11-29 $250.00 2005-11-02
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 13 2006-11-29 $250.00 2006-10-30
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 14 2007-11-29 $250.00 2007-10-30
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 15 2008-12-01 $450.00 2008-10-30
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 16 2009-11-30 $450.00 2009-10-30
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 17 2010-11-29 $450.00 2010-11-01
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 18 2011-11-29 $450.00 2011-10-31
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 19 2012-11-29 $450.00 2012-10-29
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
AKZO NOBEL NV
Past Owners on Record
AVCO CORPORATION
BOYD, GEORGE P., JR.
CASTLE, GEORGE K.
TEXTRON SYSTEMS CORPORATION
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Representative Drawing 1998-09-03 1 12
Description 1995-11-01 14 1,041
Description 1997-07-09 14 453
Claims 1997-07-09 4 107
Cover Page 1998-09-02 1 39
Cover Page 1995-11-01 1 42
Abstract 1995-11-01 1 21
Claims 1995-11-01 4 509
Drawings 1995-11-01 2 189
Correspondence 1998-05-22 1 38
Assignment 2001-02-26 3 96
Fees 1997-11-19 1 30
PCT Correspondence 1994-08-24 1 33
Prosecution Correspondence 1994-12-02 2 58
PCT Correspondence 1995-06-27 2 75
Prosecution Correspondence 1997-06-13 3 52
Prosecution Correspondence 1995-03-31 14 686
Prosecution Correspondence 1994-12-07 2 35
Office Letter 1994-10-24 1 21
Office Letter 1995-03-30 1 17
Office Letter 1995-07-28 1 13
Examiner Requisition 1996-12-13 2 68
Fees 1996-10-30 1 25
Fees 1995-10-23 1 23