Language selection

Search

Patent 2110229 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2110229
(54) English Title: APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR CHECKING PRINTED MATTER
(54) French Title: APPAREIL SERVANT A VERIFIER DES IMPRIMES, ET METHODE CONNEXE
Status: Deemed expired
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • G07D 7/12 (2016.01)
  • B41J 2/01 (2006.01)
  • B41J 3/44 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • EISENBARTH, CHRISTOPH (United States of America)
  • FINKELSTEIN, IRA (United States of America)
  • MC GHIE, DENNIS (United States of America)
  • PANOFSKY, EDWARD (United States of America)
  • JUNG, HARRY (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • KBA-NOTASYS SA (Not Available)
(71) Applicants :
  • DE LA RUE GIORI S.A. (Switzerland)
(74) Agent: MARKS & CLERK
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2003-06-10
(22) Filed Date: 1993-11-29
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 1994-08-18
Examination requested: 2000-09-19
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
08/018,810 United States of America 1993-02-17

Abstracts

English Abstract

Sheets with images are scanned to determine if the images are acceptable. Sheets with unacceptable images are marked with a reject mark. The images may define banknotes, securities, traveler checks, stamps, and so on.


French Abstract

Des pages affichant des images sont numérisées afin de déterminer si les images sont acceptables. Les pages affichant des images inacceptables sont marquées avec une marque de rejet. Les images peuvent définir des billets de banque, des titres, des chèques de voyage, des timbres et ainsi de suite.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.





The embodiments of the invention in which an exclusive
property or privilege is claimed are defined as follows:

1. ~Printed matter checking apparatus, comprising:
a scanning station for receiving sequentially a plurality
of sheets having printed images arranged in an array, said
scanning station generating data descriptive of said
images; and
data processing means receiving said data for analyzing
said data to determine whether said images meet preselected
criteria;
wherein each sheet has a plurality of documents, each
document being defined by an image either on one surface or
on both surfaces of the sheet; and
wherein the apparatus further comprises a marking station
coupled to said data processing means for receiving sheets
sequentially from said scanning station, wherein said
marking station comprises a set of printer devices arranged
in an array identical to said array of images for marking
with a reject mark any documents defined by at least one
image which said data processing means has determined does
not meet said criteria.

2. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein each said sheet has
a top surface with top images and a bottom surface with

8



bottom images, each top image being registered with a
bottom image to define one document.

3. The apparatus of claim 2, wherein said marking station
marks said top images.

4. The apparatus of claim 1, 2 or 3, wherein each of said
printer devices consists of an impact printer.

5. The apparatus of claim 1, 2 or 3, wherein each of said
printer devices consists of an ink jet printer.

6. A printing and checking apparatus, comprising:
a printing device for printing a plurality of documents
on a sheet, each document being defined by images either on
one surface or both surfaces of the sheet, said images
being arranged in an array;
scanning means for receiving said sheet from said
printing device and for generating data descriptive of said
images;
data processing means for receiving said data and
comparing said data to a preselected criteria to determine
if each of said images is acceptable; and
marking means for receiving said sheet, wherein said
marking means comprise a set of printer devices arranged in

9




an array identical to said array of images for marking with
a reject mark any documents defined by at least one image
which said data processing means has determined does not
meet said criteria.

7. The apparatus of claim 6, wherein said sheet has a top
and a bottom surface and said printing device prints top
and bottom images on said top and bottom surfaces
respectively.

8. The apparatus of claim 7, wherein said scanning means
includes a top and bottom scanner for scanning said top and
bottom surfaces respectively.

9. The apparatus of claim 7 or 8, wherein each said top
image is in register with each said bottom image to define
a document, and wherein said marking means marks said top
image of said document when one of said top and bottom
images of said document are unacceptable.

10. A method of checking images on sheets, the method
comprising the steps of:
scanning said sheets sequentially to generate data
descriptive of said images;




comparing data for each image to preselected criteria to
determine if each image meets the preselected criteria,
wherein the sheet comprises a plurality of documents each
of which is defined by images arranged in an array either
on one surface or both surfaces of the sheet; and
marking with a reject mark any documents defined by at
least one image which have been determined do not meet
preselected criteria with printer devices arranged in an
array identical to said array of images.

11. The method of claim 10, wherein each document is
defined by a top and bottom image disposed on a top and
bottom surface of said sheet, and wherein said top image of
a document is marked with said reject mark if one of said
top and bottom images of said document is unacceptable.

12. The method of claim 10, wherein said sheet has a top
and bottom surface with top and bottom images, said top and
bottom images being scanned during said scanning step.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR CHECRING PRINTED MATTER
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
a. Field of invention
This invention pertains to an apparatus for
checking printed matter, and more particularly for
checking continuous or discrete sheets with multiple
images, such as banknotes, stamps, securities and so
on.
b. Description of the Prior Art
Certain printed matter or documents such as
banknotes, stamps, securities, travelers checks and
so forth require complicated printing procedures to
prevent unauthorized duplication, copying or
counterfeiting. Inherently, this material must be
printed accurately, since mistakes are taken as an
indication that the material is not genuine. Of
course complicated printing processes increase the
chances of producing printed matter which has
mistakes. Thus after completion, these documents
must be checked carefully, and the documents with
mistakes must be rejected. To the knowledge of the
applicants, to date this checking is performed
manually, on a one to one basis. The applicants are
unaware of any automated systems capable of checking
printed matter on line and of rejecting the
unaccepted documents.
OBJECTIVES AND SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In view of the above-mentioned problems, it is
an objective of the present invention to provide an
apparatus for automatically checking and rejecting
printed matter.
- 2 -

CA 02110229 2002-11-08
A further objective is to provide an apparatus which
can perform document checking continuously on line without
the need for human intervention.
Yet a further objective is to provide a
flexible system which can perform its function at high
speed.
Other objectives and advantages of the invention shall
become apparent from the following description. A printed
matter checking apparatus in accordance with this invention
includes a scanning station for 'scanning printed matter and
generating data corresponding to the scanned images,
microprocessor means for analyzing data to determine if
these images meet some preselected criteria and a reject
station controlled by the microprocessor for rejecting
printed matter which does not meet said criteria. The
printed matter to be checked consists of images which are
printed normally in two dimensional arrays on sheets.
These sheets are sequentially fed to the subject apparatus,
where they are scanned and if necessary to a reject station
for rejection. Preferably, the reject station is adapted
to receive specific identifying data from the
microprocessor which identifies a specific document on the
sheet to be rejected. The identified document is rejected
for example by printing thereon a specific word or a
message.
3

CA 02110229 2002-11-08
More specifically, the present invention provides
printed matter checking apparatus, comprising a scanning
station for receiving sequentially a plurality of sheets
having printed images arranged in an array, the scanning
station generating data descriptive of the images, and data
processing means receiving the data for analyzing the data
to determine whether the images meet preselected criteria,
wherein each sheet has a plurality of documents, each
document being defined by an image either on one surface or
on both surfaces of the sheet, and wherein the apparatus
further comprises a marking station coupled to the data
processing means for receiving sheets sequentially from the
scanning station, wherein the marking station comprises a
set of printer devices arranged in an array identical to
the array of images for marking with a reject mark any
documents defined by at least one image which the data
processing means has determined does not meet the criteria.
The present invention also provides a printing and
checking apparatus, comprising a printing device for
printing a plurality of documents an a sheet, each document
being defined by images either on one surface or both
surfaces of the sheet, the images being arranged in an
array, scanning means for receiving the sheet from the
printing device and for generating data descriptive of the
images, data processing means for receiving the data and
comparing the data to a preselected criteria to determine
3a

CA 02110229 2002-11-08
if each of the images is acceptable, and marking means for
receiving the sheet, wherein the marking means comprise a
set of printer devices arranged in an array identical to
the array of images for marking with a reject mark any
documents defined by at least one image which the data
processing means has determined does not meet the criteria.
The present invention also provides a method of
checking images on sheets, the method comprising the steps
of scanning the sheets sequentially to generate data
descriptive of the images, comparing data for each image to
preselected criteria to determine if each image meets the
preselected criteria, wherein the sheet comprises a
plurality of documents each of which is defined by images
arranged in an array either on one surface or both surfaces
of the sheet, and marking with a reject mark any documents
defined by at least one image which have been determined do
not meet preselected criteria with printer devices arranged
in an array identical to the array of images.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Figure 1 shows a somewhat schematic diagram of a
printed matter checking apparatus constructed in accordance
with this invention;
Figure 2 shows a somewhat schematic cross-sectional
view of the reject station of the apparatus of Figure 2;
and
3b


..
Figure 3 shows a plan view of a sheet with a
plurality of documents printed thereon.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF. THE INVENTION
Referring now to the drawings, a plurality of
images are printed on a sheet 10 by a printing
press. For the sake of simplicity the printing
press is illustrated by a pair of rollers 12, 14.
These images 16, are normally identical, and are
arranged in rows and columns defining a two
dimensional array. Figure 3 shows a plan view of
the sheet, it being understood that a different set
of images ha ing the same size are printed on the
bottom surface 24 of sheet 10 in perfect
registration with the images 16 to thereby define a
plurality of documents, each document bearing one
image on top and another on the bottom.
The printed matter checking apparatus may
disposed in line with the rollers 12, 14.
Alternatively, a stack of sheets 10 may be collected
after printing and checked for accuracy at a later
time.
In the embodiment of Figure 1, after printing,
sheet l0 is forwarded to the printed matter checking
apparatus including a scanner station with a set of
scanners 18, 20. Scanner 18 scans the top surface
22 of sheet 10 and generates first digital data
signals on line 26 representatives of the images 16
on this surface. Scanner 20 scans the bottom
surface 24 of sheet 10 and generates a second set of
data signals on line 28 representatives of the
images on surface 24. Alternatively, sheet 10 may
be reversed and run a second time across the scanner
18..to generate the second digital data signals.
- 4 -




2110~~~
The digital data on the two lines 26 and 28 are
fed to a controller 30. This controller includes a
microprocessor which performs high-speed digital
analysis an the signals form these lines, and using
certain preselected criteria determines if all the
images on sheet 10 are acceptable. If these images
acceptable, sheet 10 is forwarded without any
further manipulation through a reject device 32.
If any one of the images does not meet the
preset criteria, the sheet 10 is forwarded for
further manipulation by reject station 30.
As shown in more detail in Figure 2, reject
station 32 includes a plurality of individual
marking devices 34. Preferably, these marking
devices are aligned in a direction perpendicular to
the movement of sheet 10. The number of marking
devices 34 is equal to the number of rows of images
16 on sheet 10. Each mark device may consist of an
impact printer, an ink jet printer or any other
device suitable for making a preselected reject mark
on single image to identify it as a being rejected.
The reject mark may be any mark easily visible and
clearly identifiable. For example, the reject mark
could be a big blob, an oversized X, a bar, the word
VOID, arid so on.
The controller 30 also includes several other
devices which control the movement of the sheets 10
consecutively to and through the scanning station
and to and through the reject station. It should be
understood that the controller 30 may include a
single microprocessor device, or several
microprocessor devices, each device being dedicated
for a particular function, i.e. checking banknotes,
moving the sheets 10, and so on.
- 5 -


The controller 30 checks the images on sheet 10
on an individual basis. If a sheet has an image,
such as 16' determined by the microprocessor to be
unacceptable, the controller 30 provides information
to the reject station which identifies the actual
image to be rejected. For example if 16' in Figure
3 is found to be bad, as the controller 30 forwards
the sheet 10 with the unacceptable image through the
reject station. The controller 30 also causes the
reject station to print the preselected reject mark
on image 16' by activating printer 34' at the
appropriate time, i.e. when the portion of sheet 10
is disposed directly below marking device 34'.
Alternatively, station 32 can be provided with
a set of printer devices 34 arranged in an array
identical to the array of images 16 shown in Figure
3. In this instance when sheet 10 is aligned with
the printer arrays, the specific printer 34'
corresponding to the unacceptable image is activated
thereby marking the unacceptable image with a reject
mark.
Of course a sheet l0 may have more than one
unacceptable images arranged in a row, in a column,
or distributed in a random pattern on the sheet.
The microprocessor identifies each of the
unacceptable images and orders the reject station to
mark each of the images on the sheet accordingly.
Preferably the reject station is constructed to
apply the reject mark only on the top surface 22 of
sheet 10 even if an unacceptable image~is found on
the bottom surface because the object is to mark and
identify bad documents, and it is not important to
mark the actual bad image.
- 6 -


2110~~9
Alternatively, the reject station can be
provided with two sets of marking devices, one for
the top surface and one on the bottom.
After the reject station the sheet 10 is either
. stacked of delivery or is slit into individual
documents and then stacked.
Obviously numerous modifications may be made to
this invention without departing from its'scope as
defined in the appended claims.

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date 2003-06-10
(22) Filed 1993-11-29
(41) Open to Public Inspection 1994-08-18
Examination Requested 2000-09-19
(45) Issued 2003-06-10
Deemed Expired 2013-11-29

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Application Fee $0.00 1993-11-29
Registration of a document - section 124 $0.00 1994-06-21
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 2 1995-11-29 $100.00 1995-11-10
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 3 1996-11-29 $100.00 1996-10-09
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 4 1997-12-01 $100.00 1997-11-04
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 5 1998-11-30 $150.00 1998-11-17
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 6 1999-11-29 $150.00 1999-10-29
Request for Examination $400.00 2000-09-19
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 7 2000-11-29 $150.00 2000-11-07
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 8 2001-11-29 $150.00 2001-11-08
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 9 2002-11-29 $150.00 2002-10-22
Final Fee $300.00 2003-03-27
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 10 2003-12-01 $200.00 2003-11-07
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 11 2004-11-29 $250.00 2004-11-02
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 12 2005-11-29 $250.00 2005-10-26
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 13 2006-11-29 $250.00 2006-10-26
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 14 2007-11-29 $250.00 2007-10-25
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 15 2008-12-01 $450.00 2008-10-27
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 16 2009-11-30 $450.00 2009-10-26
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 17 2010-11-29 $450.00 2010-10-27
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 2011-10-13
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 2011-10-13
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 18 2011-11-29 $450.00 2011-10-13
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
KBA-NOTASYS SA
Past Owners on Record
DE LA RUE GIORI S.A.
EISENBARTH, CHRISTOPH
FINKELSTEIN, IRA
JUNG, HARRY
KBA-GIORI S.A.
MC GHIE, DENNIS
PANOFSKY, EDWARD
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Claims 1995-03-25 3 94
Claims 2002-11-08 4 116
Description 2002-11-08 8 275
Abstract 1995-03-25 1 8
Drawings 1995-03-25 1 17
Representative Drawing 2002-12-18 1 6
Cover Page 2003-05-06 1 29
Cover Page 1995-03-25 1 19
Description 1995-03-25 6 205
Representative Drawing 1998-08-19 1 8
Prosecution-Amendment 2002-11-08 9 278
Correspondence 2003-03-27 1 30
Prosecution-Amendment 2002-05-09 2 39
Assignment 1993-11-29 5 340
Prosecution-Amendment 2000-09-19 1 32
Prosecution-Amendment 2001-02-15 1 29
Prosecution-Amendment 2001-02-16 3 141
Correspondence 2009-02-13 1 13
Correspondence 2009-02-13 1 15
Correspondence 2009-01-28 4 162
Assignment 2011-10-13 8 422
Assignment 2011-10-13 3 128
Fees 1996-10-09 1 52
Fees 1995-11-10 1 59