Language selection

Search

Patent 2115153 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2115153
(54) English Title: DEWATERING SLURRIES
(54) French Title: DESSICCATION DE BOUES
Status: Dead
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • B01D 21/01 (2006.01)
  • B01D 37/03 (2006.01)
  • C02F 1/54 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • KEENEY, MARK E. (Australia)
(73) Owners :
  • UNILEVER PLC (United Kingdom)
(71) Applicants :
(74) Agent: SWABEY OGILVY RENAULT
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(86) PCT Filing Date: 1992-08-19
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 1993-03-04
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/AU1992/000437
(87) International Publication Number: WO1993/003812
(85) National Entry: 1994-02-07

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
PK 7855 Australia 1991-08-20

Abstracts

English Abstract

2115153 9303812 PCTABS00020
The specification describes a method of dewatering mineral
slurries especially slurries of a fine coal. The method involves adding
an anionic flocculant to the slurry and subsequently adding a
dewatering aid to the slurry at or just prior to the formation of a
filter cake during a filtration step. The specification also
discloses that overloading with an anionic flocculant can be avoided
if a dewatering aid is used in combination with the flocculant.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.



WO 93/03812 PCT/AU92/00437
14
CLAIMS
1. A method of dewatering an aqueous, coal or mineral
slurry comprising adding an anionic flocculant to the
slurry, subsequently adding a dewatering aid and filtering
the slurry by means of vacuum filtration to obtain a filter
cake and a filtrate characterized in that the dewatering
aid is added at or just prior to formation of the filter
cake during filtration.

2. A method according to Claim 1 wherein the dewatering
aid comprises a salt of a fatty acid having from 8 to 20
carbon atoms.

3. A method according to Claim 2 wherein the salt is
selected from the group consisting of sodium, potassium and
ammonium salts.

4. A method according to Claim 2 wherein the fatty acid is
oleic acid.

5. A method according to Claim 2 wherein the fatty acid is
a tall oil fatty acid.

6. A method according to Claim 1 wherein the anionic
flocculant is added to the slurry at a rate in the range
from 10 to 100 grams/tonne of coal or mineral.

7. A method according to Claim 1 wherein the anionic
flocculant added to the slurry at a rate in the range
from 20 to 50 grams/tonne of coal or mineral.

8. A method according to Claim 1 wherein the dewatering
aid is added at a rate in the range from 0.02 to 1.5
kg/tonne of coal or mineral.


WO 93/03812 PCT/AU92/00437

9. A method according to Claim 1 wherein the dewatering
aid is added at a rate in the range from 0.5 to 1.5
kg/tonne of coal or mineral.

10. A method according to Claim 1 wherein the dewatering
aid comprises a salt of a sulphonic acid.

11. A method according to Claim 1 wherein the dewatering
aid comprises a fatty acid having from 8 to 20 carbon
atoms.

12. A method according to claim 1 wherein the dewatering
aid comprises an ethoxylated alcohol.

13. A method of dewatering an aqueous mineral or coal
slurry comprising adding an anionic flocculant to the
slurry, subsequently adding a dewatering aid and filtering
the slurry by means of vacuum filtration to obtain a filter
cake and a filtrate characterized in that the dewatering
aid is a salt of a fatty acid having from 8 to 20 carbon
atoms.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


WO 93/03812 PCr/~U92~00437
2115153
D}æWAAT13RING SI~RIISS

Thia inYen~io~ relate~ to im~ro~ed dewatering method~ a~d
agents for u~e in ~acuum filtration o~eration~ in ~ineral
S and coal ~xoce~ing. The in~ention i gener~lly a~licable
to the dewatering of 31urrie~ including tho3e encou~tered
in the ~ro~e~sing of mineral~ ~uch as alu~ina, a~ well a~
coal, but i~ i of partieular intere~t in the dewatering of
fine coal and aecording~y will be de~cribed in detail with
particular reference to the latter a~plication.

sack~round of_the In~en~ion
vacuum filtration i~ co~monly used in indu~trial. ~roce~e~
~o remove water from ~lurrie~. Vacuum disc and drum
1~ filter~ are widely u~ed, a3 well a~ ~acuum belt filter
~he e~ficiency of ~uch ~roce ~e~ de~e~ds i~ lar~e ~art upon
the ~h~ical ~ro~ertie~ of the ~lurrie~ ~o be dewa~ered,
a~d exten~i~a ~udie ha~e been carried out with a ~iew to
modifyi~g tho~e~-~hy~ic~l ~ro~ertie~ in order to o~timi~e
the effieieney of the dewatering ~roee~. The ~ro~ertie~
may be affeeted, for ex~mple, by chemical mea~ ~ueh aQ
` the u~e of ehemieal ~ddi~ve~, or by ~hy~ieal mean~ ~uch a~
the meehanieal treat~ent of the ~lurrie~ and/or the filter
eake which i~ formed i~ the ~aeuum ~iltration ~roee~. A~
the~e ~roce~se~ are earried out on a very lar~Q ~eale,
eeono~ie eonsi~eration~ are al~o important ~nd what may
a~ear to be ~all impro~ement~ ean re~ult in ~ub~tantial
eo~t ~a~

39 Coal proce~ing, ~articul~rly the treatment of
metallur~eal eoal, u~ually ineorporate~ wa~hi~g ~tep~ as
~art of the benefieiatio~ ~eh~me.

WO93/03812 PCT/AU92/00437
211~153




The coal-cleaning ~roce~s ~roduce~ coal wlth a broad range
of ~article Qize~. Coar~e coal (ie., >600 micron) a~d f~ne
coal are treated differently to dewater e~fecti~ely.
Water i~ u~ually re~o~ed from ~oar~e coal by ~creen
drainage or centrifugation and from fine coal (ie.,
flotation concentrate~ or refuse) by centri~ugation or
~acuum filtration. In ~ome ca~e~, thermal drying of fi~e
coal i employed as a nece~ary ~te~ to achie~e target
moi~ure~. Depending u~on the mining o~eration, the type
of coal treated and normal ~wîng~ in proce~ o~eration in
the ~lant, the moi~ture le~elz in the cleaned coal can ~ary
quite widely. Typical moisture le~el~ in coar~e coal
range fro~ 2-12%, while fine coal moi~tures can range from
1~-30%.
. Coal ~rocesQing ~lants often ha~e considerable trouble
meeting target moi~ture le~el~ in the ~roduc~ coal they
- . ~ell. A~ a re~ult of naw mining met~od~ employed in long-
. wall operation~, the proportion of fine coal reporting to
the washing & ~reparation pl~nt~ ha~ increa~ed
~ignific~ntly.~.Fine coal iR much more di$ficult and co~tly
~o dewatar than coar~e coal. Ona method often employed by
coal ~re~ ~lants to achieve moisture ~ecification~ i~ to
blend high-moi~ture fine coal with low-moi~ture coar~ coal
i~ ~ro~ortio~ necè~ary to ~u~t meet tar~et moi~ture.
While, in many ca~es, it would be much more co~t effactive
for a coal ~re~ ~lant;to ~imply di~card the fine~ ana mine
more coar~e coal, for rea~on~ of re~ource
management/utili~ation/con~ervat~on it i~ moxe ~rudent to
treat ~e f~no~.

Vacuum f~ltrat~on i~ the mo~t commonly u~ed mea~ of
mechanical treatment to dewater fine coal. Fine coal, in
~lurry form, reports to the filtration o~eration where the

WO 93~03B12 P~/AU92/00437
211~153

watex iR removed . Yacuum diE~c and drum f ilter~ are ~che
prir~ci~al tyl?e uQed by the coal industry to f ilter f ine
coal, althou~h increasinç~ intere~t i~3 beins~ ~hown in ~acuum
belt filter~. To a~ 3t in the efficient ol?eration o~
5 VlCUllm filters, reageslts are often added to the f~ed
~lurr~r -

It i~ known to u~e anionic and cationic f locculaxlts in the~racuum ~iltrat~on o~ fine coal. The~e reage~t~ are
10 necez~ary to "thicken" the ~3lur:ry a~ it i~ $ed to the
~vacuum filter to en~ure the l?ro~er fomlation of a filter
cake. It i~ thou~ht that the reage~ts functios~ by binding
the ~rery f isle coal particle~ to larger coal part:icle~ in a
ty~?ical flocculation ~?roc~, thu~ ~roducin~ a ~ore uniform
:LS and increa~ed ~?article ~iz~ diRtribution ~or better f ilter
cake l?ermeabiliky. Thi~ re~ult~ in 1~ "blinding" of tb~e
f ilter cloth and f il~cer cake by the ~ery f i~e coal
~ar~icl~ .

Both anionie floeeulant~ (u~ually high molecular weight
aeryl ~ ide/aerylate eo-~olymer~) and eationie floeeulants
(u~ually low ~olecular weight ~olyamines) are u~ed,
indi~idually or in combination, to Go~trol filter eake
formation. These reagents are alway~ added to the ~lurry
~eeding th~ ~aeuum filter~ (ie., slurry ~re-tr~atme~t) in a
. maDner ty~ieal of floeeulant addition in the mineral~
i~du~try.

There has al~o been eonsiderable interest by the eoal
industry in the use of ~urfaetants, in eombination with
floe~ulaGt2, to eDhaQce the dewateri~g of fine eoal.
Althou~h mA~y ~tudie~ ha~e been eonducted and e~orted,
there are widely ~arying rQsults/conclusio~. Some studie~
ha~e ~hown that surfactants do not ~i~nificantly affect

WO93/03812 PCT/~U92/00437
211Sl53 4

reQidual cake moisture, while other~ Qhow they do. Other
tudieR conclude that surfactant~ can be ef ective for
certain type3 o~ ~oal but ~o~ for other~.

S One o~ the mo~t ~ignific~nt reas ~ for the Yariatio~ in
the performance of dewatering aids for fine coal i the
~ariable c~emi~try o~ coal it~elf. ~nlike all other
mineral~, coal i an organic ~aterial. C~al~ ~ary widely
in bul~urface compo~ition, de~endin~ upon a multi~licity
of factorY ~uch a~ location of the depo~it, ranX and
mi~eral (i~orga~ic~ matter, deyree of weatheri~l~, internal
truc~ure/porosity, et~. Therefore, depending upon the
s~ecific coal ~reated, dewaterin~ aid ~erfor~ance can be
expec~e~ to ~ary widely ~i~ce both the ad~orption ta
surface chemieal ~ro~erty) and absorption (a bulk chemical
~roperty) eharaeteri~tie~ of eoal~ with re~pect to drainage
aid int~raction w~ll ~ary widely.

~. . .
The ~eci~i~ation of ~uro~ean Paten~ Ap~lieation
Publieation No. 460811 in the name of nniehema Chemie BV
de~eribe~ the ~ddition of anionic f loecula~t~ or eationic
eoagula~t~ to a eoal ~lurry prior to ~ltration in the
pre~e~ee of a dewa~ering aid. However, the ~eeifieation
state~ that the preferred point for addition of the
dewateri~g aid i~ from a po~ition within the filter eake
forming zone. W~ have now found that when an a~ionie
floeeulant i~ u~ed, the be~t ~oint for addition of the
dawatering aid i8 at or ju~t ~rior to the formation of the
~ilter eake during the f~ltration ~te~.
Sy~mary of the inve~tio~

Aeeordi~ to the ~re~ent in~ention the-e i~ pro~ided a
~ethod of dewatering an aqueou~ coal or mineral ~lurry

WO93/03~12 PCT~AU92/00437
2115153




com~ri~ing addi~ a flocculant to the ~lurry, ~ub~equently
add~g a dewa~ering aid, and filteri~g the ~lurry by mean~
of ~acuum filtra~ion to obtai~ a f ilter aake a~d a
fil~rate, characteri3ed in that the dewatering aid i~
added at ju~t ~rior to formakio~ of the ilter cake during
- the filtration ~e~

Preferably, the dewateri~g aid i~ a salt ~uch a3 a ~odium
~alt o~ a ~atty acid i~cluding fatty a~ids deri~ed from
. tall oil. The fatty acid may ha~e from B to 20 carbon
atoms. However, ~odium olea~e i~ ~articularly ~referred~
The d~waterin~ aid may also be a pota~sium or ~mmonium salt
of a fatty acid.

The dewaterinQ aid may al~o com~riae either a ~alt of a
gul~honic acid ~uch a~ dodecyl be~zene ~ul~ho~ic a~id, an
ethoxylated alcohol or a~ un~apo~i~ied fatty acid.

. The ~loeculau~ may be a~ded to the coal ~lurry ~rior to the filtration ~te~ in a.ratio in the ra~ge from-10 to 100 and
~ref~rably 20 to 50 ~m~ ~er tonna of ~i~eral:or coal
co~tained in the ~lurry. On the other hand the dewatering
aid may be added to the ~lurry in a ratio in the range from
. .02 to 1.5 and preferably D.5 to 1.5 ~g ~er tonne of
mineral or coal~

- In a.further a~ect of th~ i~ention we ha~e found that the
ex~en~e cationic flocculant~ ~re~ently u~ed may be
. re~laced by ~ery much smaller amount~ of anionic
~locculant~, without ~uffering the drawbac~ formerly
a~Roc~ate~ with the u~e of ~aid anionic flocculant8,
whereby a ~ery large ~a~ing in co~t i~ achie~ed.

WO93/03812 PCT/AU92/00437
211S153 6

In ye~ another a~ect of the inven~ion, a two-~tage ~roce~
i3 ~rovided in~ol~ing u~e of anionic flocculant~ in ~lace
of cationic ~locculant~, in combination with a~lication of
t~e dewatering aid at a particular ~ta~e of t~e ~roce3~, to
5 pro~ide a greatly impro~ed and ~uch more co~t-effective
proce~s ~or dewatering ~lurrie~ than ha~ hitherto been
con.idered fea~ible.

Detailed description of the invention
An ex~erimental rig wa~ e~tabli~hed enabling accurate
~imulation of actual plant o~erations at the Bellambi Coal
Com~any Pty ~td, South Bulli, New South Wale~, ~ustralia.
~he ~erformance of the laboratory f ilter rig wa~ correlated
wi~h the ~er~or~ance of a Delkor ~acuum ~elt .ilter at
Bel. la~bi . Current ~ractice in~.rol~e~ addition of a cationic
~locculant to the feed of the Delkor filt~r~ in order to
control the for~ation of the ~ilter cake c~n the f ilter
belt. T~i~ reagent addition re~re~ent~ a ~igni icant
20 o~erational cost but u~e of ~he cationic f locculant ha~
b~en con~idered nec~ary for adequate proce~ control and
~- s~erfcrmaslce of the Delkor filter~.

It wa~ nece~ary to accurately a~ess the performance of
the ca~ionic floc¢ulant on filter cake for~atio~ ~rior to
under~akin~ draina~e aid testwork. The amount of the
cationic flocqulant ~eeded to achie~e cake formation ~n the
teRt-rig comparable to that i~ the plant had to be
de~ermined and the effect of the cationic flocculant on
drainage aid ~erformance had to be a~certained.

WO93/03812 PCT/AU92/00437
~115153

Brief Summary~of the Dra~ing~

Figure 1 i5 a graph of filter cake moi~ture content ~r~us
cationic flocculan~ do~age at a fixed dryins time and
a~plied ~acuum. Fi~ure 2 i~ a gra~h of filter cake fo~m
time a~d a~arent a~pliad ~acuum again~t c tio~i~
floccula~t do~a~e rate, Fi~ure 3 i~ a ~raph o~ filter cake
moi~ture conte~t and fo~m ti~e ~er~u~ a~lied ~acuum at a
~ixed do~age rate of cationic flocculant, Figure 4 i~ a
gra~h of fil~er cake moiR~ure content versu~ do~3age rate of
dewa~ering aid where the dewa~ering aid i~ added at
dif~erent location~ in the filtra~ion ste~, Fi~ure 5 ia a
gra~h of filter cake form ~ime ~eraus a~ionic flocculant
do~age rate for two types o~ anio~ locculant, Figure 6
i~ a gra~h of filter ca~e moi~ture content ~er~u~ anionic
~loccula~t do~a~ rate for two type~ of anionic flocculant,
Figure 7 i~ a gra~h of f ilter eake moi~ture conte~t ~er~u~
:- do~age rate of dewaterin~ aid ~howing th~ offeet of
incorporating t~e dewateri~g aid at ~ariou~ loeations in
20 - the filtration ~te~, Fi~ur~ 8 iQ a graph of filter cake
moi~ture co~tent Yer~u~ d~watering aid do~age rate for bo~h
an anio~ic floeeulated filter eake and a eationie
floeeula~ed fllter eake; and Figure 9 i~ a ~ra~h of ~ilter
ea~e moi~ture eontent ~er~us a~ionie floceulant do~age ra~e
wit~ aQd without the add;tion of a dewatering aid.

Fi~ure 1 ~hows t~e time re ired to aehie~e f~lter eake
for~ation and the a~arent ~aeuum of the ~y~tem (at 80 kPa
a~lied ~aeuum) a~ a fun~tion of eoagula~t addition. To
mateh the f~lter-~ake formation t~me (5-60 sec) and
a~are~ ~aeuum eondition~ (70 kPa) of the Delkor #2
filter, a~ equi~alent do~age of 250 g/toDne of ~he eationie
floeeulant wa~ required ~ an addition to the teRt-rig
lurry.

WO~3/03812 PCT/AU92~00437
211~1~3




Figure 2 ~how~ the re~idual filter cake moi~ture~ achie~ed
in the lab tes~ rig a~ a function of cationic flocculant
addition. ~e of the cationi~ floccula~t at the do~a~e
rate determined above (for ~ro~er form time/a~parent
vacuum) resultQ in a re~idual moi~ure le~el of 22-23%.
This re~ult i~ identical to the re3idual moisture le~el~ of
~ample~ of ~ine-coal taken ~rom the Delkor #2 filter,
confirmi~g the ability of ~he te~t rig to accurately
~imulate B llambi ~la~t o~eration~. ~xces~i~e ~atio~ic
flocculant addition wa~ found to ha~e no detrimental effect
¦ on filter cake moiRture.

Fi~ure 3 show~ the ~ariation in ~ilter-cake moigture and
formation ti~ a~ a ~unction of the a~plied ~acuum (at a
fixed do~age of cationic floccula~t). ~he~e te~t~ were
conducted to te~t the ~e~Riti~ity of the te t rig to en~ure
that-change~ in re~idual mo~ture during the ~raluation of
the draiDage aids were due to chemical parameter~ and not
to mi~or:ch~nges ~n ~acuum which ;ne~itably occur during
teRt work (i.e., due to ~light ~ari~tion~ in ~ampling or
te~t ~rocedure). A~ ~een, form ti~e i~ ~irtually
i~de~endent of a~plied ~acuum (as expected) while moi~ture
~aris~ only ~lightly o~er the ~ariation~ in a~plied ~acuum
expected.

Te~ts o~ the~Bellambi ~y~tem indicate that a ~articular
drainage aid, namely ~odium oleate, had the mo~t
~ig~ificant ~otential to ach~e~e the cr~teria for technical
~ucces~ e~tablished prior to u~dertaking the ex~erimental
woxk.

In attem~ting to o~timî~e the ~erformance of ~odium oleate,
con~iderable effort wa~ ~pent to examine the most effecti~e

WO93/03812 PCT/AU92/00437
211~1~3
. ~

method of ~eagent addition to th~ ~acu~m-belt filter.
CGnsideration wa~ gi~en to a ~ari~ty o~ rea~ent-additio~
technique~. Fir~tly, there iQ often a detrimental effect
on cost-per~orma~ce of adding drainaye aid~ to the ~ilter
feed or to t~e ~u~ernatant liquor too early in the filter
cake formation Rtage as a re~ult o~ dilution of the reagent
in the slurry. Howe~er, a lo~ in reagent ~erformance due
to reagent dilution mu~t be wei~hed again~t the ~roblem~ of
(1) in~uffi~ient ~enetration of reagent-treated liquor into
the filter cake, ~2) a raduction in filt~r-~ake dry-time
and (3) the need to recycle filtrate if the drainage aid
reagent i~ a~plied as a wash after ~ilter cake formation
occur~.

~igure 4 ~how~ that at the preferred dose rate 0.S0
kg/tonne the mo~t effecti~e methods of reagent a~plication
are to en~ure that the reagent is a~lied to th~ ~elkor
filter ~from a trou~h or ~pray ~y~tem) at or close to the
~oint of formation of the filter cake. ~oisture reduction
of a~roximately 3 to 5% (22-23~ to 18-19%3 can be expected
if the reagent i~ ~ro~erly ap~lied.

~here is, howe~er, a ~e~re detrimental con~equence of
a~lying the drainage aid to the Delkor ~ilter~ too early
in the filter cake formation ~tage. This i~ due to a
~reci~itation reactio~ between the cationic flocculant and
specific ~omponeuts of ths drainage ~id.~ Thi~ ~roblem i~
~een clearly from the re~ults pre~e~ted in ~i~ure 4. When
ths draina~e aia iB added to the cationic-treated slurry,
prior to the slurry rQ~or~ing to the filter belt, a
dramatic increa~e ~n cake moisture is ob~erved. Thi~
~roblem i~ reduced if the reagent is added to the
~u~erDatant liquor after the ~lurry i~ on the belt.

WO93/03812 PCT/AU92/00437
21151~3

Anionic Flocculant Addition
~nfortunately, due to ~wings in Bellambi ~roces~
o~ration~, ~articularly a~ more fine~ rea h the filter due
to long-wall mining, i~ is extremely difficult ~o control
the Delkor filter3 to en~ure that the filter cake form zone
remain~ at the same ~oint during f il~ration, even with
flocculant addition. In an ef~ort to o~ercome a potential
~roce ~ control problem re~ulting f rom t~e need to a~ly
reagent at a critical ~oint in the proce~ o~eration, a
method was ~ought to elimi~ate the u~e of the cationic
floccul~nt in order to achieve rapid filter cake formation.

Te~twork wa~ conducted on ~am~les of fine-coal taken from
the plant ~rior to being treated with the cationic reagent,
u~i~q both of the liquid anionic floccula~t8 (i.e.,
acrylat~/acrylamide co~olymer~) currently u~ed by Bellambi
in other ~roce~ o~eration~. The re~ults, gi~en in Figure
. . 5,.~ho~that b~ re~laci~g the catio~ic flocculant with an
I . anionic flocculant the filter cake formation t~me can be
1 20 dramatically reduced (~rom 60 ~QC to 20 sec) u~ing 1~B~
; than one-tenth of the amount of r~agent (15 g/t a~ion~c
flocculant ~ 250 g~t ~ationic flocculant). As the C08t
~er weight unit is idQntical, the sa~ing is ~ubstantial.

T~ere iB, how~er, the ~ote~tial to o~erdo~e the fine-coal
~lurry with an anionic flocculant. Thi~ ~ay result in
~rocess ~rQblems not encountered w~th th~ use of the
cationic flocculant. As shown ~n t~e cake moi~ture ~ :
reagent do~age data gi~en in Figure~ 6 ~nd 9, o~erdo~ing
the snionic flocculant csn re~ult in an increa~ in the
filter cake moisture~. Howe~er, this ~roblem is not
unique to Bellambi. Mo~t unit operation~ in~ol~ing
floccula~t sddition, e~pecially thickaner~, have similar
problem~ if too much flocculant is added to a mineral

WO93/03812 PCT/AU92/00437
211~153
. ~
- ' 11
~lurry. Fort~nately, with pro~er control of the do~ing o
the flocculant to the ~lurry, ~hi~ potential ~roblem can be
~irtually eliminated.

Sodium oleate/Anlonic Flocculant_Performa~e
- In addition to ~o~ible ~roce~ ~a~ings by ~hanging from
the cationic flocculant to an anionic flo~culaat to control
filte~ cake for~ation, we ha~e found ~hat there are
significant benefit~ to the ~erformance of ~odium oleate
and the control of filter o~eration3.

Fir~tly, here is no danger of a ~etri~ental interaction of
the reagent with the anionic flocculant. ~nlike ~he
cata~trophic result ~how~ in Fig~re 4, addition of
dewatering aid ~o ~nionic flocculated ~lurry ~roduces no
dramatic increa~e in ilter cake moi~ture (a~ ~hown in
Figure 7). Howe~er, compa~ison of the ~oi~ture ~ reagent
- do~age ~rofile~ in Figure 7 clearly i~dicates that the
- reagent i~ be~t a~lied a~ a concentrated ~olution at or
~u~t ~rior to cak~ formation.

Secondly, a~ ~hown in Figure 8, at 0.5 k~/tonne do~age
: rate, there i~ a demon~trable impro~ment in the
performance of the reagent (i.e., 1.0-2.0 ~ impro~ement in
moi~ture reduction ca~ability) u~i~g it in con~unction with
an a~ionic flocculant rather:than with a cationic
floccula~t. Furth~rmore, the ~otential ~roblem of o~er
flocculation of the fi~e-coal ~lurry i~ eliminated with a
combination reagent/flocculant ~ro~r~mme. ~ab te~t~
indicatQ that, when u~ing ~odium ol~ate as a draiDage aid,
exce~ anionic floccula~t addition ha little effect on

r~idual f~lter cake moi~ture le~el~.

WO93/03812 PCT/AU92/00437
2115153 12

It will be a~parent that a number o~ ~roce~s benefit~ are
achieved by ~he in~ention.

Fir~ly, if the dewateri~g aid i~ 2~1ied to the filter
cake ~ia a ~ray at or jus~ ~rior to ~ake formation, thi~
I re~ults in a re~uction in the a~ount of draina~e aid
¦ required to eff~c~ a 3 to 4% dro~ in re~idual moi~ture in
I the fine coal filter cake.

; 10 Secondly, the a~plication of the drainage aid reagen~ to
the ~a~uum filter a~ a ~ilter-cake ~ray at or around the
¦ point o~ cakQ 40rmation on the filter belt/di~c enable~ an
anionic floc¢ula~t to be ~ub~tituted for a cationic
floccula~t for .ilt~r fee~ thicke~in~. Thi~ tw~-~tage
ap~roach to ~ine-coal dawaterin~ hae been fourld to
co~ple~ely eliminate ~robl~ a~Qciated with ~roce~
control if a~ anionic flocculan~ i~ u~ed to ~hicken the
filter ~eed ~lurry. ~he reaqe~t ~ray ha~ been ound to
an~ure that il~er cake ~ermeabili~y durin~ the dewaterinq
~ha~e of ~iltration (~.e., once air ba~in~ ~enetration o~
the filter cake) i~ ma~ntained re~ardle~ of ~ny ~l~ght
- o~erdo~in~ of the an~onic floccula~t due to ~roce~ ~wing~.
Thi~ permit~ an anionic f loccula~t to be aub~tituted for a
cationic flocculant with enormou~ ~rocQ~s za~ing~.
Figure 9 ~how~ the impact on f iDal ~roduct cake moi~ture
u~ an anionic ~locculant ~retreatment ~te~ ~r~or to
filtration w~th and without thQ aid o~ the a~ ed reagent.
H~g~ ~roduct cake moi~ture~ are encountered where the
~locculated pretreatment i~ too high and the corres~onding
curve ~how~ the ri~ in moi~ture after thi~ phenomenon
occurs (i.~., around 20 g/T flocculant do~e).

WO93/03812 PCT/AU92/00437
21151~3
13
~owe~er, i~ a dual floccula~t/reagent ~y~t~m, the ~roblem#
e~coun~ered with flo~culant overdo~ins a~e corre~ted by way
of a ~y~ergism with the raage~t addition.


- The e~d re~ult is a lower cake moi#tu~e with a far more
C05t effec~i~e ~retreat~ent ~te~.

s~
Although th~ experimenta work de~cribed abo~e wa~ carried
out in co~nection with the de~elo~me~t of fatty acid
deri~ati~es and particularly ~odium oleate a~ dewatering
aia~, it i~ a~arent that the conce~t of a~lyi~g a
~olutio~ of the dewateri~g aid at or about th~ ~oi~t of
for~ation of the filter cake i~ ~ombi~atio~ with u~e of a
lo~cul~nt i~ no~el ~er ~e and ge~erally a~licable u~
con~entio~al dewateri~g aid~. ~he present in~ention
there ore ~x~and~ to thi~ concept a~ a~plied to the ,~.
dewaterin~ of slurrie~ U8i~ dewatering aids other than
2Q fatty acid ~erivati~e~.

~licatio~ of thA abo~e identifiea concept enable~
~ub~titutio~ of a~ionic floccula~t, hitherto believed to be
i~practical, for the much more expe~i~e ca~ionic
~loccula~t hit~erto employed i~ ~he dewatering of Rlurrie~,
~articularly i~ the dewa~erin~ of ~i~e coal. A~ detailed
abo~e, this i~.o~ co~iderable economic ~ignificance.

It will be clearly under~tood th~t tha in~ention i~ it8
~enoral a~ect~ iR ~ot lim~tea to the particular deta~lR
~et out i~ the experimental work di~clo~ed above.

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 2115153 was not found.

Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date Unavailable
(86) PCT Filing Date 1992-08-19
(87) PCT Publication Date 1993-03-04
(85) National Entry 1994-02-07
Dead Application 1996-02-19

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Application Fee $0.00 1994-02-07
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 2 1994-08-19 $100.00 1994-02-07
Registration of a document - section 124 $0.00 1994-07-29
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
UNILEVER PLC
Past Owners on Record
KEENEY, MARK E.
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Description 1993-03-04 13 686
Drawings 1993-03-04 9 212
Claims 1993-03-04 2 69
Abstract 1993-03-04 1 39
Cover Page 1993-03-04 1 20
Office Letter 1994-05-06 1 29
International Preliminary Examination Report 1994-02-07 11 378
Fees 1994-02-07 1 44