Language selection

Search

Patent 2127696 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2127696
(54) English Title: METHOD AND USE INVOLVING NAPHTHALENE SULPHONATE SALT(S) AND POLYETHYLENE OXIDE, TO IMPROVE RETENTION AND DRAINAGE
(54) French Title: METHODE POUR AMELIORER LA RETENTION ET LE DRAINAGE UTILISANT DES SELS DE TYPE SULPHONATE DE NAPHTHALENE ET UN OXYDE DE POLYETHYLENE
Status: Deemed expired
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • D21H 17/09 (2006.01)
  • D21H 17/53 (2006.01)
  • D21H 21/10 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • RADU, GEORGES (Canada)
  • LANGEVIN, PIERRE (Canada)
(73) Owners :
  • E.QU.I.P. INTERNATIONAL INC. (Canada)
(71) Applicants :
  • E.QU.I.P. CANADA INC. (Canada)
(74) Agent: ROBIC
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2005-10-25
(86) PCT Filing Date: 1992-11-09
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 1994-05-26
Examination requested: 1999-10-22
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/CA1992/000487
(87) International Publication Number: WO1994/011575
(85) National Entry: 1994-07-08

(30) Application Priority Data: None

Abstracts

English Abstract





The present invention relates to a method and a use of naphthalene sulphonate
salts) under granulated form or as a con-
densed or diluted solution, and a solution of one or several polyethylene
oxide having a molecular weight varying from 1 x 10 6 to
13 x 10 6, allowing for a mixture comprising lignocellulosic particles and an
aqueous medium to significantly improve the
retention of particles such as fines and fibers, on a wire screen and the
drainage of the aqueous medium.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.





20

CLAIMS

1. In a method for the production of paper, the
improvement wherein one or several naphthalene sulphonate
salt(s) selected from the group consisting of sodium,
potassium, ammonium, calcium and aluminum salt(s) of
naphthalene sulphonate, in a granulated form or as a
condensed or diluted solution, and a solution of one or
several polyethylene oxide having a molecular weight
varying from 1 × 10 6 to 13 × 10 6 are admixed with a mixture
comprising lignocellulosic fibers and fines and an aqueous
medium, with the proviso that:

- said polyethylene oxide is admixed in said mixture when
said mixture already contains at least a part of said
naphthalene sulphonate salt(s);

- the polyethylene oxide is admixed in such an amount as
to represent from 10 to 700 grams per ton of dry matter of
said mixture; and

- the naphthalene sulphonate salt(s) is admixed in such an
amount as to represent from 50 to 1500 grams per ton of dry
matter of said mixture.

2. A method according to claim 1, wherein said
naphthalene sulphonate salt(s) comprise a condensed or
diluted solution and a sufficient aqueous medium is present
in said mixture so that said mixture is pumpable.

3. A method according to claim 1, wherein said
naphthalene sulphonate salt(s) comprise a condensed or
diluted solution and a sufficient aqueous medium is present
to define an aqueous suspension.





21

4. A method according to claim 3, wherein said aqueous
suspension is laid on a wire screen of a paper machine to
form a sheet of paper.

5. A method according to claim 3, wherein said aqueous
medium comprises clarified white water collected in a wire
pit of a paper or pulp machine.

6. A method according to claim 3, further comprising
collecting white water and recycling said white water to
dilute said aqueous suspension.

7. A method according to claim 4, further comprising
collecting white water comprising unretained naphthalene
sulphonate salts and polyethylene oxide, and recycling said
white water to prepare said mixture or as a dilution water
for said aqueous suspension.

8. A method according to claim 7, wherein an equilibrium
is achieved between the amount of naphthalene sulphonate
salt(s) and polyethylene oxide retained on the wire screen
and the amount of naphthalene sulphonate salt(s) and
polyethylene oxide collected in the white water and adding
to said mixture or said aqueous suspension an amount of
naphthalene sulphonate salt(s) and polyethylene oxide
equivalent to the amount retained in the paper.

9. A method according to claim 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 or 8,
wherein polyethylene oxide has a molecular weight varying
from 4.5 x 10 6 to 12 x 10 6.





22

10. A method according to claim 9, wherein there is
further admixed to said mixture an enhancer consisting of a
polyaluminum sulphate.

11. A method according to claim 9, wherein is further
admixed to said mixture an enhancer consisting of a
polyaluminum silicate sulphate.

12. A method according to claim 9, wherein there is
further admixed to said mixture an enhancer consisting of a
sodium aluminate.

13. A method according to claim 9, wherein there is
further admixed to said aqueous mixture an enhancer
consisting of polyaluminum chloride.

14. A method according to claim 9, wherein there is
further admixed to said mixture an enhancer consisting of
magnesium hydroxide.

15. A method according to claim 9, wherein there is
further admixed to said mixture an enhancer consisting of
bentonite.

16. A method according to claim 9, wherein polyethylene
oxide is admixed with the mixture to represent from 30 to
100 grams per ton of dry matter of said mixture.

17. A method according to claim 16, wherein naphthalene
sulphonate salt(s) is(are) admixed with the mixture to
represent an amount 50 to 500 grams/ton of dry matter of
said mixture.





23

18. A method of improving a retention of lignocellulosic
fibers and fines, from a mixture comprising said
lignocellulosic fibers and fines in an aqueous medium, on a
wire screen and to improve a drainage of the aqueous
medium, comprising adding to said mixture one or several
naphthalene sulphonate salt(s) selected from the group
consisting of sodium, potassium ammonium, calcium and
aluminum salt(s), said salt(s) being in a granulated form
or as a condensed or diluted solution, and a solution of
one or several polyethylene oxide having a molecular weight
varying from 1 x 10 6 to 13 x 10 6; the polyethylene oxide
being admixed in such an amount as to represent from 10 to
700 grams per ton of dry matter of said mixture and the
naphthalene sulphonate salt(s) being admixed in such an
amount as to represent from 50 to 1500 grams per ton of dry
matter of said mixture.

19. A method according to claim 18, wherein said
naphthalene sulphonate salt(s) comprise a condensed or
diluted solution, and a sufficient aqueous medium is
present in said mixture so that said mixture is pumpable.

20. A method according to claim 18, wherein said
naphthalene sulphonate salt(s) comprise a condensed or
diluted solution, and a sufficient aqueous medium is
present to define an aqueous suspension.

21. A method according to claim 20, wherein said aqueous
suspension is laid on a wire screen of a paper machine to
form a sheet of paper.





24

22. A method according to claim 20, wherein said aqueous
medium comprises clarified white water collected in a wire
pit of a paper or pulp machine.

23. A method according to claim 20, further comprising
collecting white water and recycling said white water to
dilute said aqueous suspension.

24. A method according to claim 20, further comprising
collecting white water comprising unretained naphthalene
sulphonate salts and polyethylene oxide, and recycling said
white water to prepare said mixture or as a dilution water
for said aqueous suspension.

25. A method according to claim 24, wherein an equilibrium
is achieved between the amount of naphthalene sulphonate
salt(s) and polyethylene oxide retained on the wire screen
and the amount of naphthalene sulphonate salt(s) and
polyethylene oxide collected in the white water and adding
to said mixture or said aqueous suspension, an amount of
naphthalene sulphonate salt(s) and polyethylene oxide
equivalent to the amount retained in the paper.

26. A method according to claim 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24
or 25, wherein polyethylene oxide has a molecular weight
varying from 4.5 x 10 6 to 12 x 10 6.

27. A method according to claim 26, wherein there is
further admixed to said mixture an enhancer consisting of a
polyaluminum sulphate.





25

28. A method according to claim 26, wherein there is
further admixed to said mixture an enhancer consisting of a
polyaluminum silicate sulphate.

29. A method according to claim 26, wherein there is
further admixed to said mixture an enhancer consisting of a
sodium aluminate.

30. A method according to claim 26, wherein there is
further admixed to said mixture an enhancer consisting of
polyaluminum chloride.

31. A method according to claim 26, wherein there is
further admixed to said mixture an enhancer consisting of
magnesium hydroxide.

32. A method according to claim 26, wherein there is
further admixed to said mixture an enhancer consisting of
bentonite.

33. A method according to claim 26, wherein polyethylene
oxide is admixed with the mixture to represent from 30 to
100 grams per ton of dry matter of said mixture.

34. A method according to claim 33, wherein naphthalene
sulphonate salt(s) is(are) admixed with the mixture to
represent an amount 100 to 500 grams/ton of dry matter of
said mixture.


Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


V4VCD 94/1157 '~' ~.~ ~ ~ ~ ~,~ Pt'T/CA9Bd004~7
~ t~ USE IP~DLV~ ~L~ NATE SALT C S ) AHI7
PC)LYE'~~iYI~.~'"~ v~SE, To DROVE RET~'TON r'1h'D DRS.
The present invention relates to a method a :d a use of.
naphthalene sulphonate salt(s), under granulated form or as
a condensed or diluted solution, and a solution of
polyethylene oxide having a molecular weight varying from
1 x 106 to 13 x lob, allowing for a mixture comprising
lignocellulosic particles and an aqueous rnedium to
significantly ~,mprove the retention of particles such as
fines and fibres, on a wire screen and the drainage of the
aqueous mediu~i.
la
Ad~r~ntageously, a particles retention, especially a retention
of fines and fibres can be achieved for kraft, sulphite (high
and low yield), bisulphite, mechanical, oPCC, ~TCMP, TCMP,
RCMP, hard wood, such as oak, birch, maple, elm, wild-cherxy,
soft woods such as conifers trees, and TMP pulps and any mix
in an~r proportion of two or more types of pulp.
Appl ~.dation may be the ~ollowa.ngs
any washer, thickener, save-all, disc filter or drum
filtex in any pulp making process;
- any pulp machine, board machine or paper machine in the
~roduc~i~n sector;
any clarifa~r or flotation or f~.bre separation unit .in
2~ the effluent treatment process, including krofta,
posseidon, sedimentation clarifies, but not limited to
these;
- any equipment used in the deinking process, included or
.not ,ab~Ve s r
3V
~p to now, it was known to use polyethylene oxide to improve
fr~m a mixture comprising lignocellulosic fines and fibres,
and an aqueous medium, a retention of fines and fibres on a
wire screen and improve a drainage of the aqueous medium.
The Applicant has now surprisingly found that a method
~~~~'~ ~~~~~°~'


CA 02127696 2004-05-14
2
involving a combined use of one or several. naphthalene
sulphonate salt(s), under granulated form or advantageously
as a condensed or diluted solution, and a solution of one or
several polyethylene oxide having a molecular weight varying
from 1 x l0a to 13 x 106, in admixture with a mixture of
lignocellulosic particles and an aqueous medium, allows to
improve a retention of said particles on a wire screen and a
drainage of said aqueous medium. This combined use shows a
synergistic effect. A condensed naththalene sulphonate salt
means a solution saturated with said, salt for example a
condensed sodium naphthalene sulphonate salt means an~aqueous
to solution containing about 41-46% of said salt.
More particularly, the invention relates to an improvement
in a method for the production of paper and analogous
products. This improvement lies in that one or several
naphthalene sulphonate salts) selected from the group
consisting of sodium, potassium, ammonium, calcium and
aluminum salts) of naphthalene sulphonate, in a granulated
form or as a condensed or diluted solution, and a solution
of one or several polyethylene oxide having a molecular
20 weight varying from 1 x 106 to 13 x 106 are admixed with a
mixture comprising lignocellulosic fibers and fines and an
aqueous medium, with the proviso that:
- said polyethylene oxide is admixed in said mixture when
said mixture already contains at least a part of said
naphthalene sulphonate salt(s);
- the polyethylene oxide is admixed in such an amount as
to represent from 10 to 700 grams per ton of dry matter of
said mixture; and
- the naphthalene sulphonate salts) is admixed in such an
30 amount as to represent from 50 to 1500 grams per ton of dry
matter of said mixture.


CA 02127696 2004-05-14
2a
The invention also relates to a method of improving a
retention of lignocellulosic fibers and fines, from a
mixture comprising said lignocellulosic fibers and fines in
an aqueous medium, on a wire screen and to improve a
drainage of the aqueous medium, comprising adding to said
mixture one or several naphthalene sulphonate salts)
selected from the group consisting of sodium, potassium
ammonium, calcium and aluminum salt(s), said salts) being
in a granulated form or as a condensed or diluted solution,
and a solution of one or several polyethylene oxide having
a molecular weight varying from 1 x 106 to 13 x 106; the
polyethylene oxide being admixed in such an amount as to
represent from 10 to 700 grams per ton of dry matter of
said mixture and the naphthalene sulphonate salts) being
admixed in such an amount as to represent from 50 to 1500
grams per ton of dry matter of said mixture.



'VV~ 94/ 11575 s~ .g ~ ) ff'C.°T/CA92/004~7
~~~r~r~t7
3
Advantageously, the naphthalene sulphonate salt(s),
especially a sodium naphthalene sulphonate salt, is (are)
uniformly dispersed in the mixture before introducing one or
several polyethylene oxide. Preferably, sodium naphthalene
sulphonate should be applied preferably 30 seconds before the
sal t ( s ) ge t ( s ) in contact with the polyethylene oxide to t~:us
give enough time to the salt to candition particles, such as
fines and fibres.
Preferably, -in a pulp and paper plant, the admixt~.xre of
naphthalene sulphonate salts) with a mixture of
lignocellulosic fines and fibres and aqueous medium may be
applied anywhere in the system and advantageously not between
fan pumps and ~ head box..It could have been applied in the
1a white water system (wire pit), mixing tank, in the
.pr~par~tion of dla~ system or any tank that could be in
contact with fibre giving on the machine. Preferably in the
~i~~d pulp tank. The polyethylene oxide solution may be
app7:ied preferably between the fan pump snd the head box, but
it is also possible ~o apply it before the fin pump and
remain ~ffic~:~nt, like between the m3.x tank and the fan pump.
Advantage~usly, o~ae or ssveral naphthalene sulphonate
salt(s), said ~alt(s) being under granu3ated form ~r
advsnt~geously as a condensed or diluted soluti~n, and a
s~lutir~n of one or sweral polyethylene oxide having a
molecular weight varying from 1 x lob to 13 x 1~~ ire adr~a.xed
wit3~ a mixture domprising lign~cellulosic fines and fibres
and an aqueous medium to define a pumgab~.e pu'ip~'
l~dvantageously, one or several naphthalene sulphonate
s~lt(s), said salts) being under granulated form or
advantageously as a condensed or diluted solution, end a
solution of one or several polyethylene oxide waving a
molecular weight varying from 1 x 10g to 13 x 10~ are admixed
with a mixture comprising lignocellulosic fines and fibres

/ /.y:,.,' r~,.' ...
r r,,r
..rr/.,":, . . ~, .. . .. , .....
Er'. . °l. ! . i: r. , . ' . . . . ~ . ~ . , . , . . . . .
W~ 94/d 1575 P~T/~CA92/004~7
a 6u
4
and an aqueous medium to define an aqueous suspension.
Advantageously, said aqueous suspension is either of the type
intended to be laid on a wire screen of a paper machine to
form a sheet of paper or of a pulp mac:~iz:e, or of t :e type
defining a white water collected in a wire pit of a paper
machine or pulp machine. This white water may be partially or
totally recycled as an affluent of a step for preparing a
pumpable pulp comprising lignocellulosic fines and fibres and
an aqueous medium, or passed at leas t in par ~ with o .her
waste water through a clarifier. This white water charged
~rith naphthalene sulphona~te salts) and polyethylene oxide
contribute to make the clarifies more efficient.
Advantageously, said aqueous suspension is of the type
intended to be .aid on a wire screen of a paper machine to
form a sheet of paper or of pulp machine type, wherein a
white water collected in a wire pit of the paper machine or
of ~ pulp machine and essentially consisting of a part of
2~ sari pre~rious suspension not retained on the wire screen and
still containing .naphthalene sulphonate salts) and
polyethylene oxide, is recycled to a step for preparing
either a pump~ble pulp or a fresh aqueous suspension intended
to be laid on aforesaid wire screen, being understood that
said recycled white water contributes to the admixture of a
part ~f the sulphr~nate sal t ( s ) and polyethylene ~xide with
the mixture.
Pxef er~bly, ' an' ' equilibrium is ~~'t between the' amount ~f
3o: naphthalene sulphonate salts) and polyethylera~ oxide
retained on the wire screen and the amount.~f naphthalene
sulphonate salts) and polyethylene oxide collected in the
white water in the wire pit and recycle to the preparation of
either a pumpable pulp or a fresh aqueous suspen~ian intended
to be laid on the wire screen, to thus allow to admix to said
pulp or fresh-aqueous suspension intended ~oW~ laid on the
5i~~ ~ ~~~J'~~ 5~,


CA 02127696 2004-05-14
wire screen, only the amount of naphthalene sulphonate
salts) and polyethylene oxide retained in the sheet of paper
or in the pulp.
5 ;Advantageously, naphthalene sulphonate salts) are selected
from the group consisting of sodium, potassium, ammonium,
calcium and aluminium salt(s).
Advantageously, polyethylene oxide has a molecular weight
Io varying from 4.5 x 106 to 12 x 106.
Advantageously, is further admixed to said mixture at least
one enhancer selected from the group consisting of:
- a polyaluminium silicate sulphate;
- a polyaluminium sulphate;
- a sodium aluminate;
- polyaluminium chloride;
- magnesium hydroxide; and
- bentoniae.
Advantageously, polyethylene oxide may be admixed with the
mixture of lignocellulosic particles, .such as fines and
fibres, and an aqueous mediut~ to represent from 10 to 700
grams per ton of dry matter of said mixture, preferably from
to loo grams per ton of dry matter of said mixture.
EX~IPLE
On a paper machine having a capacity of 600 T of newsprint
30 per day (i.e. a paper machine known under the trade name
BELBAE 3 - VERTICAL), a pulp resulting of a blend of 45% of
sulphite pulp, 50% of mechanical pulp and 5% of kraft pulp
was used.
The example was carried out without and with a condensed
solution of sodium naphthalene sulphonate and a solution of

WO 94/11575 PfrT/CA92/OU4~7
~~'j
~5 L
w, ~, :~~
a mix polyethylene oxide having a mean molecular weight
ranging between ! 'to 8 x lob, according to the invention. ,
The present invention will be better understood with
reference to the zoliowing figures in which:
Figures 1, to 6 show variations of drainage without and with
a combined use of sodium naphthalene sulphonate and
polyethylene oxide;
Fi.gtares 7 ~:0 9 show the sheet strength without and with a
combined use of sodium naphthalene sulphonate and
polyethylene oxide;
,15 Figure 10~ shows retention of first press without and with a
cbmbined use ~~ sodium naphthalene sulph~nate end
polyethylene oxide~
Fi.c~ure 12 shop's average consistency of wire without end with
2o a co~in~d use of sodium naphthglen~ sulph~inate and
polyethylene oxide;
Fi;~ur~ 22 shows head fox consistency without end with a
combined: use of sodium 'naphthalene sulphonete and
25 polyethylene oxide;
Figure 13 shows dosage of process with polyethya.ene oxide;
p figure 24 'sh~ws v'~os~ge' ~ f , process ' w~.th sodium naphthalene
30 sulphonate salt;
Figures 15 to 22 sh~w opacity and whiteness withbut and with
combined use ~f s~dium naphthalene sulphonate and
polyethylene oxide;
Fi~uxe 23 shows a sheet formation without and with a combined
~,~~ .~ ~ ~~~~~.
~, ~ ~~1 ~
.. : . ; .. :;.. . . . . ; . _ : . .
rr,..,:;;. .:.. ,. . ~..~; - ,,. ~ ~ ., : , .., ,. .. , :..._

e3'~ 9~/ 1 ~ 575 PCTICA9~/00487
7
use of sodium naphthalene sulphonate and polyethylene oxide;
Figure 24 shows consistencies of white water returns without
and with a combined use of sodium naphthalene sulphonate and K
polyethylene oxide;
Figures 25 and 26 show tonnage of white water transferred
without 'and with a dombined use of sodium naphthalene
sulghonate and polyethylene oxide;
Figure 2~ shows fibre ~.osses in sewer without and with a
combin~d use of sodium naphthalene ~ulphonate and
polyethylene oxide; and ,
F~i.gure 28 shows drainage related to temperature without mnd
Wi.~h a combined use of podium naphthalen~ sulphonate ~nci
~oly~t~hylene oxide.
~'~he following r~sult~-were obtained:
Figures 1 to 2~ show several variati~ns ~btained by using a
combined use of a condensed solution of sodium n~phth~.l~ne
sulphoxxat~ salt ( i.dentified process par 1169 ) and a solution
of a mix of p~lye~hylene oxide having the aforeshid mean
~5 molecular weight (identified process ~ND~ 1100), in ~fo~esaid
ex~~pl,~, In those-figures, informat~ons appearing at the
~ left ~f a dark vertical line a~~ without th~, use of
~aphthmlene sulphonate salts) and polyethylene ox~.de, end
information apge'axing ~t the right ''off the d~lrk' v~~tical line
~0, are according to the invention.
T~ ~ T~t .
~S
J ' . ~.~,' 'n . n.; , , ' ~.':~. '~. ~.' , : . , ' : . . . '. , : : , . .. .
. :.".. ' . ~ , ' ,,.. ' .'. . .. . . .~:': . , . . . , . ~, . ;' ' .~.: ;
.'.~'.
5~5..:..."Ilrn ,.n..:':.". .....~...,: . "..:i,:,'. " v.-,:-' r ~..~...'.
.';:.'..... , . '. .. . ....,. . .. ~ ,..'. :.~,' :'.'.' . '. .. . rr,:",'.:..
..... .. . =..: .,...... .
f v:~~.:.,.'.: :: ~:'.' . . ';~'..'.'.,' . ~, ::.::.., ; :.... :.. .~, . ::. ,
.... .: . . . _ , . ....., .;: ~,_'.. ,; ~.,... , ,, r.,. .':~. .. .,'.. .
....
....... ,...., .n ,.. ... .. ~, ~ .. , . ,.. . , ~ . . ~..~ ~ .: , . ,...... .
. .. . , .. ....

'~~ 94/11575 ~crica~~ziooas7
4 v~ ~3~
:. $
i .' "°
TABLE I : aUMMARY OF RESULTS
LTEM PRE-TRIAD TRIAL Gp.x~1
P,unnability Good Good No change
Retention - 30 kg/day 43.4 48.3% -~- 4.9%


- 4~ kg/day 43.4% 50x4% * 7.0,%


Opacity - 45 9/T~2 91.9 92.5 + 0.6


48 9/mZ 93.2 93.8 -~ 0.6


Br~.ghtn~~s 60.6 60.5 - 0,1


E'l~ech con~c~mption 2.09 2:28 0.19


(k~/tonne)


~a~~azi .


capacity 15435 fpm 20077 ~.pm * 4642 Ipm


' cl:oUdy' ~0~1~. 0.098% 0.067 1:03 1%
2 0


clear cony.:' 0.087% 0.050% _ 0,037%


Pump 7~.6 - con~istan~e 0.128% 0.048 ~.0~0%
~


- tonnage 7.87 t/d t/d 5.39 t/d
2.48



8t~s~i usage - dryers 23.5 t/hr 2.48 t/td ~.5 t/hr


si~:o 8 : 7 t/hr 0 t/hr 8 a 7 t/hr


7 : 7 ,7 7 0*,
F'omnat~.on ~PlvUi~,Iif, ~ , .



ibex loges


~~ psm.~ 7 a ~.t/d ~.1t/d 2 y5 t/d -


~r~m mill 17.4 t/d 13.6 t/d 3:8 t/d


to river 3s7 t/d 3a0 t/d 0:7 t/d'



EXCEPT AT ~tETEI~ITIONS t7~7ER 54%


~ ~ eaw


'77 ~..:~:;.. , .:.' ,: ~,:r-: . ; . ..~ .'~'. :-~ . ~ .. .:, .. '...
; -..~; .,:".. ..;...v ... ~:. ::._ ~.. ..... ..:.,
':...-.-~~ .v._ . ' . ' ,. ,:..
...:.
. ,_ . , ~:..
:,o...... . . . , . . ., ... . , .. ..... , .... ........
,.,. ..... - ... . _ . .. ... -, ~
..~.. ..... ..., .. . .... ., . .......: ~.... ..... . .,.:
.r. ~ . .. ... . ... . . . . .. .
.



dV~ 94/11575 A ~~ ~ ~ ,,, PC-1'/CA92/00457
9f
TABLE III : DOSAGE, RETENTLON AND CONSISTENCIES
DOSAGE ~CO~NSTSTENCIES
11,70 1169 RETENTION
~,g/7 Icg/j ~ TOil~s Haad bc~x
0 0 I ~3.~% 0.57% 1.01%
30 300 , 48.3% 0.47% 0.91%
40 e~40 50.4% 0.~3% 4:8?%



'I'~l3hE ~1~ ~ ~R.IGNTNESS 0~'
FINES


Ph E~ N JITLY I 6 . 1: 9 9 2 _


paper Headb~x ~T~:~es



BRTGHTNESS 58:2 56.3 53.2


A,~ - 0 . ~ 8 ~ . n 9 ~, 0 .18


~~;~ , ~ '4 :'?4 ' 3,.'16 ' r



. ~ ~ ~ ~I



' ,r.. .,.:.-._r..-..;.x. ." ;~~". , ......, , .' . '.~..:~. ' , v'~ ~
,,.t~.
.:..:':... : , :.~:~ , ....:..... ___.r , . ..... ~.. ..., , -. ;;.
..;.~ ~ ', -; ~ ' .. , , .:,,. . . . : :: , , ,
..,:
,..; , , , . . .. .. ;;, - , ,,.-.. , .. :,, . . .. ; : ~,~ . . ~ ; ,
. -.., , . _ , .. :...
~1 .: r_. J . ~ ,.:,r. , , r.:~.,.. . ... ,r.... , :~..~, , .. . ,. . .
...
. _ .... ~ .. ~... ,~.. '-. .. ' ..: . .........,r.
; . ...~:,.
.,,





VU~ ~3~i/~ 15'5 P(:T/CA92100487
~, a
w4 ;~
Tt~HL~ ~T ; O~TIC CHARACTERISTICS
ACCORDING TO
h
CHARACTERISTICS ~E~'ORE TRTAL THEIN'V_ENTION .
5 GR..~DE, AVG 2 STO AVG 2 STD
Opacity 48g/m2 93.2 0.36 93.8 0.29
45g/m2 91.9 0.30 92.5 0.32
10 Eri.c~htness 48gjm2 60.5 0.33 60.3 0>30
,~5g/mz 60.7 0.29 60.5 0.22
* The wire consistencies dropped from 0.57% to 0.43%
ar.~d 2.5 t/d ~f fines were retained in the 'sheet
~ ra~h~r than lost to the clarifies yet it only cost
0.9~~$/ton tg recover the brightness Ios~.
Therefare ~ a 0 : 6 point tone opacity gain was achiwe~d on both
~4S g/m~ and ~5 9/m~
~l~~LE Ill : ~IFIITEw~TER ?9.l~TA~EI~EIdT
2 5 PRE-TRII~rL DST
(3FTT~iI NATION
Save-all - d~pacity 15435 Ipan 2tD07?
_ cloudy 'consistency ~0.09~% x~067%
30 - clear c~nsistency 0.0~'~% ~.0~0% .
Pump 257 d Consistency 0.1.SS% ~~0~1%
- tonnage 4.28 t/~ 1.~9 t/j ;
pump 71~ - consistency 0.125% 0.45%
7.87 tjj 2.48 t/j
~- to~iage
~ ~ sRm wm ~ a °m' G"
~~~~~.


VV~ 94/115'75 , PCT~Cr~.9xlooa~7
m
TA~~E ~rzz o FISER ~ossEs
PAPER PIACHINE CLARIFIER CLARZFIER
DATES SE'6~TER FEED EFFLUENT
~~'/D) t'~'/D) ~T/D)
1-15 June 7.6 17,4 ~.7
2~-29 ,dune 6.7 * 14:7 * 3.2 *
Zo
30--15 July 5.1 1~.5 3.0


* Clear vahite ~rat~r afterstart-up.



2 ~ t'F~IaI~' 1~I I I o S"t'F:,~
~dEAS'Uk~I~S


FrCC4aRDTI~TC~
Tf)
THE


2N~1EPITT~N


PRE-TRIAL AFTER OPT~IKI~~TI~N



25 ' 5i3.o t~I~p~ratur~ 56C 5~.5~~


Sil~ et~am S:7 t/h ~ t/h


Drier 'st~~ll~


- ~5 ~r~2 20.4. t/h 21.0 t/~


48 g/~z ~~ 23.5 't/h '
23 t ~ ;


30 T~tal steam


45 g/m2 39:~ t/h 30.Q t/h


4$ g'm2 41.9 t/h 34.7 t~h


T~n sham per ton paper 2.07 1.76



~~~





WAD 94/11595 PCT'/CA92/00487
-..
a
c
' '"~ 12
CONISTENCY .AND RETENTION ON MACHINE
HOUR


DATE CONSISTANCIES DOSAGES


REF RETENTTON 1100 1169


HEAD HOX IRE PIT (Kc~/J)(K~/J)
W


0 16-May 1.070% 0.628 41.3% 0 0


1 17-May 1.072% 0.630% 41.2% 0 a


2 18-May 1.037% 0.597% 42.4% 0 0


3 19-May 1.034% 0.592 42.7% 0 0


4 20-May l.flOfl% 0.595% 40.5% fl 0


5 21-May 1.010% 0.600% 40.6% 0 0


6 22-May 1.016% 0.592% 41.7% 0 0


7 23-May 1. fl4fl~ 0.60fl% 42 . 3% fl 0


8 24-~Ma'y' 1. fl14% fl o 43 a 1% fl 0
577%


9 25-May 1.024% , 0.597% 41.7% 0 0


10 26-May 1.000% 0.563% 43.7% fl


1~1 27-May 1.010% 0.584% 42.2% 0 0


12 fll-Jun 1.fl28% 0.592% 42.4% fl fl


13 fl2sJun 1:008% 0.575% 43.fl% fl ~ fl


14 03~Jun 1.12% 0.57fl% 43.7% fl


~~ ~5~~:un p:993% 0.575% 42:1% 0 fl


l fl6-Jttn d fl . 43 . 2% Q
g 1. 037% 589%


17 fl7Jun 1.fl55% fls625% 40.8% fl


1~ 10-Jun v 1.fl23% 0.570% 44,.3% 0 fl


19 11-Jun 1:058% 0.610% 42.3% 0 0


20 12-Jug 1.fl27% fl.547% 46.7% 0


STOP


21 23-Jun 08:45 Ai~R 0.916% 0.441% 51.9% 0 fl


22 11:3 AID 0.934% 0.470 49.7% fl 0


23 O1:2~ PM 0.964% fl:499% 48.2% 0


2A~ 2~-Jun 08:27 ~I 1.013% 0.590% 41:8% fl 0


25 11:07 AM 1x029% fl.538% 47.7% fl


~6 01:19 ~'M 1.034% 0.557% 46:1% fl fl


27 25-Jun 08036 AM 1.023% 0.594% 42.9% fl 0


2g 1fl:4~2AM 1:~fl08% 0.564% 44.0% , 0 , fl ,;


,2g fl2:18PM 1.013% 0.553% 45.4%


3~ 26_Jun 01:36 PM 0.976% 0:573% 41:3% fl fl


31 lO:fl6AM 0.958% fl.527% 45:0% 0 0


4fl ~2 08:54 AM 0.936% fl:53?% 42.6% ~ 0


'33 29Jun fl1:56PM fl.912% fl:554% 39.3% 0


34 29-,~tln02:OflPM fl.922% 0.501% 45.7% 45 721


35 fl2:3flPM 0.94fl% fl.502% 46.6% 45 721


3~ 03:OflPM fl.922% 0.488% 47.1% 45 691


37 fl3:3flPM fl.926% fl.493% 46.8% 45 655






W~ 941 1575 PC~i'/C~92/00487
~~~'~ ~~'~3
13
38 04:30 PM 0.920% 0.497% 46.0% 45 620


3g 08:30 PM 0.884% 0.412% 53.4% 45 ?35


40 09 00 PM 0 . 884% 0 . 420% 52 . 5% 45 735


41 10:30 PM 0.804% 0.364% 54.7% 45 735


42 11:50 PM 0.836% 0,404% 51.7% 45 735


43 30-Jun 12:30 AM 0.860% 0.384$ 55.3% 45 762


44 Q1 :30 ?~M 0.844% 0.408% 51, .7% 45 762


45 02:30 AM 0:836% 0.424% 49.3% 45 762


46 03:24 AM 0.868% 0.416% 52.1$ 45 811


47 04:30 AM 0.864% 0.404% 53.2% 45 811


48 08:00 AM 0.880% 0.460% 47.7% 45 811


09:30 PaM 0.920% 0.476% 48.3% 45 811


5p 10: 30 .~1M 0 . 912% 0 . 480% 4? . 4% 45 8I1


51 11:30 AM 0.904% 0.468% 48.2% 38 811


IS 52 01:48 PM 0.884% 0.448% 49.3% 38 811


53 02:30 PM 0.90% 0.468% 48.5% 38 676 .


54 03:00 PM 0.904% 0.464% 48.7% 38 '676


55 05:00 PM 0.920% 0.448% 51.3% 62 676


56 08:30 ~M 0.884% 0.440% 50.2% 62 676


57 ~1~:15 PPS 0.880% 0.444% 49.5% 62 676


58 11:15 PM 0.880% 0:426% 51:6% 50 676


0J.-Ju1 12:30 AbI 0:884% 0.438% 50.5% 50 676


~a:~~ 0:896% 0.442% 50.7% 50 676


61 02:30 AM 0:880% 0 % 50 676
0.440% 50.


6~ 03:35 Frog 0.884% 0.436 50.7% 50 676


04:30 AM 0.880% 0:43% 50.2 50 676


6q; 05:25 ~I 0.868% 0.434% 50.0% 50 676


65 08:10 PAM 0.880% 0.458% 48.0$ 50 676


6~5 08:30 AM 0.904% 0.444 50.9% 50 676


6,~ X0:36 ~1,M 0.904% 0.416% 54.0% 48 676


6~ llgq~~ p~ 0.900% 0.428% 52.4% 48 676


~g 01;45 PM 0.916% 0.456% 50:3% 48 6?6


03:00 PM 0.888% 0.436% 50.9% 48 676


~1 . 04:00 PM 0.872% 0.436% 50.0% 35 X76


~2 4~a:00 PIE! 0.872% 0.428% 50.9% 35 676
~


06~0~ FM 0~~92~ 0.44'6% 50.0% 35 : 676 ,,
'


73 08:00 PM 0.896% 0.440% 50.9% 35 6~6
74


75 09:00 PM 0.884% 0.452% 48.9% 35 676


'~ ~,pgl5 QM 0.904% x.448% 50.x% 35 676
'


. 77 10:55 PM 0.880% 0.456% 48.2% 35 76
6


78 02-Jug 12:05 .AM 0.884% 0.44% 49.3% 35 691


79 01:00 ~'I 0.872% 0.436% 50.~% 35 691


80 02:00 AIrI 0.888% 0.442% 50:2% 35 691


gl 02:55 AM 0.892% 0.432% 51.6% 35 608


g2 08:18 AM 0.884% 0.446 49..5% 35 478





'JVV~ 9x/115'75 ~'(.°T/CA92i004$'7
4~ ~ li,y
14
83 09:00 ANI 0.884$ 0.454% 48.60 35 478


g4 10:15 pM 0.888% 0.440% 50.5% 35 349 .


85 11:00 ~M 0.884% 0.440% 50.2% 35 349


86 12:00 PM 0.872% 0.440% 49.5% 35 349


g7 01:57 PM 0.836% 0.426% 49.0% 35 349


03:00 PM 0.824% 0.418% 49.3% 35 349


8B 04:10 PM 0.816% 0.424% 48.0% 35 349


8g 05:00 PM 0.840% 0.406% 5I.7% 35 34~


g0 06:00 PM 0.848% 0.432% 49.1% 35 34g


gl 06:45 PM 0.828% 0.408% 50.7% 35 349


92 08:50 PM 0.828% 0.376% 54.6% 35 349


g3 09:55 PM 0.844% 0.406% 51.9% 35 349


94 11:00 PM 0.836% 0.414% 50.5% 35 349 .
.


95 03-~~tl:12:00 AM 0.832% 0.400% 51.9% 35 349
96


01:00 l~M 0.828% 0.408% 50.7% 35 349


97 02:00 AM 0.844% 0.420% 50.2% 35 349


g8 03:00 AM 0.856% 0:434% 49.3% 35 386


gg ~4:00 g1M 0.868% 0.430% 50.5% 35 386


100 04:54 ~M 0.864% 0.428% 50.5% 35 386


101 08:10 ~I 0.840% 0.426% 49.3% 35 386


102 ~ 0.828% 0.426% 48.6% 35 386
Qg~Oa


103 TEME . 0.428% 48.6% 35 386
10:18 PIM 0:832%.


104 1Z:15 ~M 0:844% 0.424% 49.8% 35 3~~


105 ~~~, 12:20 PI~d 0.856% 0.426% 50.2% 35 386
X


06 56 04:20 PM 0.868% 0.426% 50.9 35 386


~7 ~5 06:25 PT~I 0.880% 0.436% 50.5% 35 386


108 53 07:45 PM 0.892% 0.40% 50.7% 35 386
~ 5


i : 08:55 PM 0,888% 0.440% 50.5 35 386
g 5~.5


110 5 10:04 PM 0.?84% 0.382% 51:3% 35 386
x'2


p x.11 . 11:13 PI~2 0.860% 0.418% 51a4~ 35 386
11 5
r3


3 2 . 0.446% 50.4% 35 386
01:24
~I
0.892%
313IT


~,i3 4 ~ 0.45% 49.x% 35 3~6
5 02:20 1~M 0.896%
52


114 . 04s10 P~M 0.892% 0.458% 48.7% 35 386
53


115 53 06:00 FPM 0.904% 0.454% 49.8% 35 386
1


~ 16 5 07:5'7 PaM 0.900 0.464% 48.4% 35 386
52


3 X17 . ~~~~5,5 .0;'.912% 0.4'~~% 4800% '35 386
,,11~5~
5


. 10:05 FPM 0.932% 0.474% 49.1% 35 386
52
5


ii9 . 12:00 PM 0.936% 0.464% 50x4% 35 386
54


112 - 02:15 PM 4.928% 0.483% 48x0% 35 372


121 54 05:00 PM 0.932% 0.472% 49.4% 35 372


40 122 908% 0.468% 48.~~ 35 372
07:27 PM 0


123 53.5 . 0.474% 50.0$ 35 3~2
948%
PM 0


124 . 476% 48.0% 35 3?2
54 09:42 0
~
916%
0


12~ 3 . . '4% 35 372
11:10 PM 478% 50
: 0


126 5 JUII~ .
12:10
AM
0.964%




lWC,l 9~&/ I 1575 PCTlC~92/00~6~7
127 53.5 02:25 A.M 0.944% 0.448 52.5% 35 372


128 54 04:03 ANd 0.952% 0.490% 48.5% 35 372


129 54 05:05 AM 0:920% 0.484% 47.4% 35 372


130 53.5 07:05 AM 0.944% 0.472% 50.0% 35 3?2
~


5 131 54 08:37 AM 0.952% 0.484% 49.2% 35 ,
372 .


132 55 20:50 AM 0.952% 0.496% 47.9% 35 372


133 55 02:30 PM 0.988% 0.502'x' 49:2% 34 372


5 134 5 04:30 PM 0.988% 0.494% 50.0% 33 301


135 54 07:15 PM 0.984% 0.482% 51.0% 32 301


10 136 54 08:25 PM 0.980% 0.480% 51.0% 31 301


137 53 09.36 PM 0.948% 0.490% 48:3 30 301


138 53 11:47 PM 0.996% 0.498% 50.0% 29 301


139 6 JUIL Ox..:.12 d.~M 0.996%0.492% 50.6% 28 301


140 54.5 0~2':55 .AM 0.964%0.488% 49.4% 27 301


15 141 54 04:04 AM 0:948% 0.496% 47.7% 26 301


142 05:30 AM 0.968% 0,492% 49.2% 25 301


143 ~ 55 07115 ~M 0.960% 0.488% 49.2% 25 X301


144 10:30 ~I 0.964% 0.498% 48.3% 25 301


1e~5 11:30 AM x.932% 0:492% 47.2% 25 301


146 02:05 pM 0:920 0.486% 47.2% 25 30~


1.4? 04x15 PM 0.900% 0.468% 48.0% 25 301


148 08'20 PM 0.832% 0.428% 48.6% 25 301


149 09:20 PM 0:918% 0.455% ,50.4% 25 301


150 54 11::04 PM 0.936% 0.479% 48.8% 25 30I


151 7 JUIL 12:30 PsM 0.952% 0.514% 46:0% 25 30~.


, 152 X4:5 01:34'AM 0.924% 00511% 44.x% 25 301


. 54 03:30 PrM 0.91% 0.506% 44:x% 25 COI
153


154 0422, 0950%: 0.50% 47.4% 25 301


X55 54 ~5:35 PeM 0:9.44% 0:515% 45.4% 25 301


156 07:00 AM ~:932$ 0.500 45.5% 25 301


157 54 07:49'AM Oe93S% 0.5~5~ 46,0% 25 301


leg ~9:12 AM 0.896% 0.484% 46,0% 25 301


159 1t~:00 AM:0:928% 0.474% 48:9% 25 301


~;~'0 11:40 Pr'~i ~.9~8%0.504% 45:?% 25 301
,


35' 161 02:00 PM 0:82% 0.500% 43.9% 25 ~O1
'
'


, ~i ~~' ~t~:3~i~ PM 0~~9~32~k0.49~G% 46.8% y25 ; ~
~ O1
~


6 0:40 PI~I 0.900% 0 .492% 45. ~% 25 ~O1
2


163 08:10 PM 0.992% 0.517 47.9% 25 301


164 54:5 10:09 PM 0.916% 0.447% ' 51.2% 25 301
6


5 53 11:28 PM'0:930% 0:468$ 49.7% 25 301
1
6


6 ~UIL 0.499% 47.6% 25 301
x. 12:42
AM
0.952%


167 8 02:25 F1M 0.950% 0.511% 46.2% 25 301
6 53


1 966% 0.515% 46.7% 25 301
8 04:15 P1M 0


16g 50 . 0.344% 25 3~1
170 08:58 PM 0.796%


171 52.5 10:49 PM 0.866% 0.396% 54.3% 25 301


~r~~ ~~'~~E E'f.


: ,::~:_','n ..,. .,.....:..~ ''W.. .. , ... ...:..~~~ ~... :
~9' . :.:. . ~ .~ ..., .. , ,~_.:. '.. ~ ~.~..~....'. , .
.,.
. ,':, -.. ~...... ~. ~ . ,. . .
s'*..v... .,'.., ,:_.., , ' .. ~: .~
,r . . ...."..., . . . . . . : ;... ,
, ....., , " , ~..-., y ..: .. ., ,
..... . .
'
.
..



~i ':.,,~.,, y ~':,. , :..~:... .,~.:~., .,.,. ~ i.. ..~ ,.~ ~... ' ..,.,. ;.
. .,:; , .,,. , ,..... , . ~ ...
W~ h4/11575 P~,T/CA92/00437
_..'
s 9..~r~ ~ 4~ ~ . .
16
172 52.5 11:55 PM 0.900 0.441% 51.00 25 301


173 9 JUIL 01.12 AM 0.912% 0.452% 50.4 20 301 ,


1?4 53.5 02:2? AM 0.910% 0.461% 49.3% 20 301


175 52 03:55 l~.T~I0.886% 0.459$ 48: 2 20 301
0


176 52 05:04 ~1M0.958% 0.483% 49.6$ 20 301


177 06:25 A,M0.942% 0.481% 48.9 20 301


178 5'2 07:28 AM 0.944% 0.480% 49.2 25 301


1?9 10:06 AM 0.944% 0.485% 48.6$ 25 301


180 11:52 AM 0.946% fl.496% 47.6% 25 390


181 01:43 PM 0.940% 0.485% 48.4% 25 390


182 05:54 PM 0.950% 0.483% 49.1% 25 3~0


183 07:00 PM 0.956% 0.493% 48.4% 25 390


184 53.5 09:34 pM 0.818% 0.395% 51.7% 25 390


185 53.5 11:OO PM 0:918% 0.449% 51.1% 25 390


186 53 12:00 .FPM0:952% 0.510% 46:4% 25 390


187 53 01:04 ~I 0.960% 0.513% 46.6% 25 390


1.88 53.5 02:06 P1M0:942% 0.495% 47.5% 25 390


189 53:5 03:25 AM 0:938% 0.490% 47x8% 25 3g0


1g0 53.5 04:33 ~i 0.936% 0.478% 48.9$ 25 390


lgl 53.5 05:36 ~I x.944% 0.484% X8:7% 25 390


192 5~ 06:30 0.952% 0.486% 48.9% 30 390


193 53 07:34 1~M0.934% 0.475% 49.1% 35 390


~g4 52:5 09:00 ~NI0.824% 0.392% 52:x% 29 390


195 IO JtJIL10:50 ~I x.894% 0.443% 50:4% 28 390


196 02:54 PM O.B56% 0.440% 48.6% 28 390


197 04x33 ~I~0.848% 0.427% 4g.6% 2~ 390


1.g8 52:5 09:25 PM 0.878% 0.456% 48.1% 28 390


lgg 53 10:20 PM 0.876% 0.461% 4?.~% 28 390


200 53 11:39 PM 0.880% 0.465% 47:2% 28 390


201 52 . 12 l~hl0. X84% 0.466 47 .3% 28 390
5 :
3U


202 a2 01:30 ~i 0.886% 0.462% 47.9% 28 390


203 52;5 02:36 ANi0.886% 0.474% 46e5% 28 390,


204 11 JUTL 05:01 PvM0.882% 0.461% ~?.7% 28 390


205 5~1 . 06 ~1M0 . 864%0 . 458% 47 . 2~ 390
5 : 0%
~4


3 206 52.5 07:09 P~I~I0.890% 0.468% 47.4% 28 390
5


'~Q7 ',53 ~8:13 ~! 0':894% 0.465% 48.'0% ' 28 390'


208 09:45 AM 0.916% 0.4??% 47.9% 28 390


~~9 21:35 ~i 0.920% Oo501% 45.5% 28 390


210 02:40 PM 0.477% 47:4% 28- 390
0.906%


4p , 04:18 0:489% 46.1% 28 390
211 PM '
0.908%


212 52 10:55 0.501% 45.8% 28 390.
PM
0.924%


213 52.5 12:12 0.493% 46.3% 28 390
~"I
0.918%


z~.4 52.5 01:36 0.480% 45.8% 28 3gfl
~i
0.886%


215 52 02:37 0.481% 46.3% 28 390
AM
0.896%


45 215 12 JUTL 0.473% 47:0% 28 390
03:42
AM 0.892%


~~~~~




V4V~ 94/11S7S P~T/CA92/00487
17
217 52.5 04:45 AM 0.882$ 0.460$ 47.8$ 28 390


218 52 05:52 RM 0.876% 0.463% 47.1% 28 292


219 52.5 06:55 AM 0.878% 0.461% 47.5% 30 292


220 07:55 AM 0.892$ 0.458% 48,7% 30 292 ,


221 09:15 AM 0.880$ 0.466$ 47.00 30 531


222 10:25 AM 0.874$ 0.461$ 47.3$ 30 531


223 11:30 ~NI 0.844$ 0.428$ 49.3$ 30 531


224 12:25 PM 0.854$ 0.447$ 47.7$ 30 531


225 01:35 PM 0:882% 0.450% 49.0% 30 531


226 02:35 PM 0.870% 0.460% 47.1% 30 531


227 03:40 PM 0.~?8% 0.458% 47.8% 30 531


228 X4:20 PM 0.866$ 0.457$ 4'i.2$ 30 531


22~ 05:25 PM 0:848% 0.44?% 47.3% 30 531
1


230 52.5 08:00 PM 0.880% 0.473% 46.3% 30 531


231 S2 09115 PM 0.862% 0.460% 46.6% 30 531


232 52.5 10:23 PM 0.878% 0.466% 46.9% 30 531


233 11:20 PM 0.882 0.468% 46.9%, 30 531


234 52.5 12:20 ~T 0.8?6% 0.462% 4'7.3% 30 531


23 13 JUIL 01:25 ~I 0:874% Oa472% X6.0%, 30 531
5


236 52 02:33 AM 0:894% 0.476% 46.8% 30 531


2g7 52 03:34 ~1M 0.888% 0:486% 45:3% 30 531


238 52 04:36 P.M 0.882% 0:472% 46.5% 30 53a


239 52 05:34 ~M 0.880% 0.471% 46.5% 30 531


240 52 06:35 ~'I 0.8?8% 0.4?3% 46.1% 30 337


241 52 07 ~ 35 ~i Q . 0. 478% 46 .5.% 30 33?
894%


242 p~:50 AM'0e912% 0.473% 48.1%: 30 33?


243 10:36 PAM 0.914% 0.469% 48.7% 30 33?


244- 11:48 ~1M 0.924% 0:484% 47.6% 30 337


245' 11:5 0.928% 0.544% 45.7% 30 337


246, 12;0 PM 0.962% 0.514 46.6% 30 X37


247 12:30 P1K 4:962% 0.510% 47.0% 30 337


248 02:52'PM 0:958% 0.474% 50.5 30 337


249 03:04 PM 0x946% 0.484% 48:8% 30 337


25~y 03:16 Pd~i 0.966%0.483% 50.0% 30 337


25I 03:30 PM 0.930% 0.488% 47:5% 30 337


2.5~ ~ ' 04 a 50' "PM~ 0 . 468%' 48. 6% 3'0 ~3?
~ f 0.910%


253 5 08:10 PM 0.922% 0.466 49.5 30 337
2


254 52 09115 AM 0.924% 0.466% 49.6% 30 337


2~5 52 10:25 PIE 0.924% 0.477% 48.4% 30 337


256 52 11:30 PM 0.950% 0.488% 48x6% 3~ 337


257 14 JUII, 0.472% 49.1% 30 33?
12:33
AM 0.928%


258 52 01:4~ AM 0.930$ 0.462% 50.3% 30 337


259 ~1 .. 03:25 AM 0.914%0.472% 48.4% 30 337


X60 51 05:15- AM 0.928% 0.469% 49.5% 30 337


261 51 06:38 AM 0.948% 0.482% 49.2$ 20 337


5~ ~ ~ ~ r ~,~



WCD 94/~ 1575 PCT/~A92100487
,ice ;~ f'' 18
262 51.5 07:38 A~'I0.992% 0.509% 48.7% 15 337


263 09:00 AM 0.956% 0.535% 44.0% 10 337


264 14:00 AM 0.950% 0.485% 48.9% 25 337


265 07:38 AM 0.904% 0.485$ 46.3% 30 337


26b 01:30 PM 0:928 0.481% 48.2% 30 337 ..


267 03:15 PM 0.902% 0.465% 48.4 30 337


268 0:882% 0.481% 45.5% 30 337


69 51 08:00 PM 0.886% 0,460% 48.x.% 30 337
2


. 50.5 09:40 PM 0.900% 0.474% 47,3 30 337
270


271 10:34 PM 0.878% 0:461% 47:5% 30 337 .



'1WC~ 94/11575 ~'C'T/CA9~/00~857
19
S~IVEI~Ia~ TEST ~tEStILTS
DATE HOUR IN FLOW CLOUDY VACU-
CLOUDY
CLEAR
CLEAR
THICK-
VACU-


klf~in WATER UM REMARKS
WATER
HATER
HATER
SHED
UM


no no 2 no nu PULP no.1no.2
1 1 2


16.0 1.041%>0.110%0.114% 0.192%0.139%3.216%25 24


22 MAY 15.4 1.026%0.111% 38 36
0.11T'f.
0.143%
0.083%
3.853%


2 ,JUNE 15.0 1.040%D.056%0.079Y. 3.?00%
0.061%
0.028%


p 9 JUNE 15.3 0.888%0.095%0.094% 0.094% 3.074%36 34
0.039%


15.4 0.992%0.09810.08Ti.


4 JULY 15:120.0 0.714%0.086%0.096% 0.056%0.070% 33 35
5


5 1:30 20.0 0.756%O:O7b%0.088% ,0.056%0.060% 3b 35


?:30 20.0 0.710%0:080%0.084% 0.040%0.0722 32 33


1 5 1b:15 20.3 0.'52%D.078%0.090% 0.072%0.082%2.800%38 40 y


2D:52 20.1 0:67b%0.0?2%0.081% 0.044!Ø044%3.60D%38 35


6 0:17 20:1 1.104%0.090'/Ø084% BREAKAGE3.530%21 31 DURING BREAKAGE


3:50 20.1 0.69i3h%Qd090%Q:084% 0.060%0.070%3,620 30


To40 20:1 0.816%O:0729:0.104% '0.0b8%0.086%3:920%


14:2Q 19.2 0.963%0:070%0.072% 0.052y0.Ob4%2.810%35 33


22:12- 18.3 fr.954%0:063%O.Qbb% 0.054%0:056%3.800%33 29


7 2x07 D:D 0.8b4X0;~7b%O.OTbX 0.058%O.OT2%3:760%25 2t~


'' Sa55 193 0.844%O,OOb%0.080x 0:062%0.050%3.480%33 25


8 0:00 18:6 0.Tb4%O.D64%0.07b% 0.054%0.052%3.b40%34 30


,'Z 5 11x00 20:0 0.678%0.054%O:Ob2% 0.04(i/0:048%2.42D%


'21:50 18.b 0.02%0.038td0.050% 0.032%0.014%2.9648%24 20 SEW AFTER


9 1:42 l~:b 0.T62XO.Ob4%0:050% 0.056%0.034%3.5811%31 24


6x50, 20.0 0:696%0.074%O.OTO% O.OSb%0.040%3.000%34 24


22:07 ' 19:1 0.?28%0.054%O.Ob2% 0.048%0.058%2:90% 2~ 22


2:35 19:4 0.8~b%0:068%0.064% 0.04b%0.054%3:140%35 24


7x15 20.0 Oeb44%0:062%0.066% 0:044%Oa044%3.b20%37 24


22:45 ' 20.0 0:~60%O.OT4%0.068% O.ObZX0.054%3:740%39 23


11 2x415 20:0 0:950%0.06b%0.074% 0:04b7:O:aS~3.140%3~ 21


b:50 20:5 0.798%'0.010%0.074% 0.054%0:042%3.760%37 19


'!2 1:20 20.5 0:880%~,0.074%'0:070%r 0:062%2.820%r'3317.'.
0:470% '


6:15 20.0 1:038%0:056%0.05b% 0.048%n:052%3.500!~0 22


23:'i0 20.0 0.010%~:050%0.048% 0.038%0.038%3.700%2~


13 3:05 20:0 0.632%0.070%0.076% 0.052%0.056%3.440%24


6x50 20.0 0:x.4%O.OT4%0.076% 0.048%0.044'1.3:960%36 2b


~ Q 20x15 24:0 0:850%0.010%0.070% 0.046%0:03~%3.100%42 27


14 0:90 20.0 0.?60%0:054%O.ObO% 0.028%0.028%3.3~% 40 ~b


5:4D 2D:D 0.998%0.D6b%0.074% O.ObD%0.074%3:610%36 26


20125 ZD.O O.TbB%D.D6D%0.074% O.DSbYØ068%3.300%35 24


1b 21:42 19.D D:732'/D.D4D% D.D30% 35 22
D.Q4b% 3.300%
O.D30%


9T 2:25 19.0 0.790%0.050% O.D4b% 29 25
0.054% 3:b2T/
0.028%


b:15 20.0 D.780%0.060% 0.058%: 34 32
O.Ob6%. 3.800%
0.048%


.


. . ;';;.. ::: . . ::'. .. . :; : " ..: :.;.::, ; .. , -_ .;:
.
~ . ~ : . .. ~ . v , ., . ::;' . :';
e.,; . .., . . .. , - : ~ ~ :: . ,~_:~:
. ~ .. ;. _ . .: ; .,.
, ;:.
,



Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 2127696 was not found.

Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date 2005-10-25
(86) PCT Filing Date 1992-11-09
(87) PCT Publication Date 1994-05-26
(85) National Entry 1994-07-08
Examination Requested 1999-10-22
(45) Issued 2005-10-25
Deemed Expired 2006-11-09

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2001-11-09 FAILURE TO PAY APPLICATION MAINTENANCE FEE 2002-11-07

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Application Fee $0.00 1994-07-08
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 2 1994-11-09 $100.00 1994-11-08
Registration of a document - section 124 $0.00 1995-08-24
Registration of a document - section 124 $0.00 1995-08-24
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 3 1995-11-09 $50.00 1995-11-09
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 4 1996-11-11 $50.00 1996-09-24
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 5 1997-11-10 $75.00 1997-10-22
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 6 1998-11-09 $75.00 1998-10-20
Request for Examination $200.00 1999-10-22
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 7 1999-11-09 $75.00 1999-11-09
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 8 2000-11-09 $150.00 2000-11-01
Reinstatement: Failure to Pay Application Maintenance Fees $200.00 2002-11-07
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 9 2001-11-09 $150.00 2002-11-07
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 10 2002-11-12 $200.00 2002-11-07
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 11 2003-11-10 $200.00 2003-10-08
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 12 2004-11-09 $250.00 2004-11-09
Final Fee $300.00 2005-08-09
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
E.QU.I.P. INTERNATIONAL INC.
Past Owners on Record
E.QU.I.P. CANADA INC.
LANGEVIN, PIERRE
RADU, GEORGES
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Claims 1995-12-20 7 503
Description 1995-12-20 19 1,351
Cover Page 1995-12-20 1 37
Abstract 1995-12-20 1 61
Description 2004-05-14 20 1,306
Claims 2004-05-14 6 197
Drawings 1995-12-20 28 1,310
Cover Page 2005-09-29 1 31
Fees 2001-09-11 1 35
Correspondence 1998-12-16 1 29
Assignment 1994-07-08 23 816
PCT 1994-07-08 3 123
Prosecution-Amendment 1999-10-22 4 120
Correspondence 1994-08-24 4 117
Correspondence 2001-09-11 1 54
Fees 2002-11-07 1 42
Fees 2003-10-08 1 30
Prosecution-Amendment 2003-11-17 2 64
Fees 2002-11-07 1 32
Fees 1998-10-20 1 34
Fees 1997-10-22 1 35
Fees 1999-11-09 1 30
Fees 2000-11-01 1 30
Prosecution-Amendment 2004-05-14 12 367
Fees 2004-11-09 2 44
Correspondence 2005-08-09 1 25
Fees 1996-09-24 1 42
Fees 1995-11-09 1 42
Correspondence 1995-03-01 1 14
Correspondence 1994-12-21 3 80
Fees 1994-11-08 1 40