Language selection

Search

Patent 2136097 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2136097
(54) English Title: PARTICULATE CAF2 AGENT FOR IMPROVING THE MACHINABILITY OF SINTERED IRON-BASED POWDER
(54) French Title: AGENT PARTICULAIRE A BASE DE CAF2 AUGMENTANT LA MACHINABILITE D'UNE POUDRE FRITTEE A BASE DE FER
Status: Deemed expired
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • B22F 1/00 (2006.01)
  • C01F 11/22 (2006.01)
  • C22C 33/02 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • ANDERSSON, OWE (Sweden)
(73) Owners :
  • HOGANAS AB (Sweden)
(71) Applicants :
  • HOGANAS AB (Sweden)
(74) Agent: FETHERSTONHAUGH & CO.
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2004-01-27
(86) PCT Filing Date: 1993-05-27
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 1993-12-09
Examination requested: 1999-12-23
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/SE1993/000468
(87) International Publication Number: WO1993/024260
(85) National Entry: 1994-11-17

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
9201678-1 Sweden 1992-05-27

Abstracts

English Abstract



The invention relates to an additive for improving the machinability of iron-
based powder compositions. The additive contains
calcium fluoride particles which are included in an amount of 0.1-0.6 % by
weight in the powder composition. The invention
further relates to powder compositions containing the additives indicated, as
well as sintered products produced from the powder
compositions.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.



11

CLAIMS:

1. An iron-based powder composition essentially free
from hard phase material for compacting and sintering into
products having enhanced machinability, said composition
comprising, in addition to iron, at least one of the
alloying elements C, P, Cr, Mn, Cu, Ni and Mo, wherein the
iron-based powder comprises 0.1-0.6% by weight of CaF2 powder
as an agent for improving the machinability, particles of
the CaF2 powder are not attached to graphite particles, the
CaF2 powder optionally is combined with one or more
conventional machinability-improving agents and essentially
no elementary sulfur is present in the agent(s) for
improving the machinability of the sintered products.

2. A powder composition according to claim 1,
comprising 0.15-0.6% by weight CaF2 powder.

3. A powder composition according to claim 2,
comprising 0.2-0.5% by weight CaF2 powder.

4. A powder composition according to claim 1, 2 or 3,
wherein the alloying elements comprise, based on the weight
of the composition: 0.1-1.2% by weight C, 0-0.6% by weight
P, 0-25% by weight Cr, 0-10% by weight Mn, 0-5% by weight
Cu, 0-8% by weight Ni and 0-2% by weight Mo.

5. A powder composition as claimed in claim 4,
comprising 0.05-0.5% by weight of MoS2.

6. A powder composition as claimed in claim 5,
comprising 0.1-0.3% by weight of MoS2.

7. A powder composition according to any of the
claims 1 to 6, comprising free CaF2 particles having an
average particle size below 100 µm.


12
8. A powder composition according to claim 7, wherein
the free CaF2 particles have an average particle size between
about 20 to about 70 µm.
9. A powder composition according to any of the
preceding claims 1 to 8, wherein an additional
machinability-improving agent is Mns in an amount of at most
30% by weight of the total weight of CaF2.
10. A powder composition according to claim 9,
comprising at most 15% by weight of MnS based on the total
weight of CaF2.
11. A sintered product having enhanced machinability
and being essentially free from hard phase material, said
product comprising 0.1-1.2% by weight C, 0-0.6% by weight P,
0-25% by weight Cr, 0-10% by weight Mn, 0-5% by weight CaF2,
0-80% by weight Ni, 0-2% by weight Mo, 0.1-0.6% by weight CaF2
and the balance to 100% being iron.
12. Use of CaF2 particles which are not attached to
graphite particles for improving the machinability of
sintered products prepared from an iron or steel powder
which is essentially free from hard phase material.
13. A method of improving the machinability of
sintered products, comprising adding CaF2 particles, which
are not attached to graphite particles, to an iron or steel
powder which is essentially free from hard phase material,
compacting the iron or steel powder to a green body, and
sintering the green body.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.



WO 93/24260 ' PCT/SE93/00468
1
Particulate CaF2 agent for improving the machinability
of sintered iron-based powder.
The present irwen't~on relates to a machinability-
improving powder to be added to an iron-based powder
composition for use in powder-metallurgical manufacture
of components.
Powder-metallurgical manufacture of components often
involves,~the following process steps. A base powder, gene-
rally an iron or steel powder', is admixed with alloying
elements, such as nickel, copper, molybdenum and carbon,
in the form of a powder, and a lubricant. The powder mix-
ture is thereafter compacted in a press tool yielding what
is known as a green body of almost final geometry. After
compacting, the compact is sintered so as to obtain its
final strength, hardness, elongation etc.
One of the major advantages of powder-metallurgical
manufacture of components is that it becomes possible, by
compacting and sintering, to produce blanks of final or
very close to final shape. There are however instances
where subsequent machining is required. For example, this
may be necessary because of high tolerance demands or
because the final component has such a shape that it can-
not be pressr~d directly but requires machining after sin-
tering. More specifically, geometries such as holes trans-
verse to the compacting direction, undercuts and threads,
call for subsequent machining.
By continuously developing new sintered steels of
higher strength and thus also higher hardness, machining
has become one of the major problems in powder-metallur-
gical manufacture of components. It is often a limiting
factor when assessing whether powder-metallurgical manu-
facture is the most cost-effective method for manufactur-
ing a component. Hence, there is a great need for new and
more effective additives to improve the machinability of
sintered steels. It then is important that this additive
does not appreciably affect the mechanical properties,

CA 02136097 2003-O1-20
22055-113
2
such as tensile si:rength z~nd elongation, of tloe sintered
material.
Today, there are a nurnbc~r of knowrn substances which
are added to iron-based powder mixtures to facilitate the
machining of components after sintering.
The commone:~t powder additive a.:~ MnS, which is men-
tioned e.g. in EP 0 1f33 666, describing how the machin-
ability of a sintered steel is improved by the admixture
of such powder. Materials which are difficult to machine,
in this context materials having a hardness above about
180 HV, cannot however be mar:h~.nc.~d proper y by adding MnS.
Moreover, the addition of Mn;> often entai:Ls an unaccept-
able reduction of: the strength of. the mat~er~ial after sin-
tering.
US 4,927,461 describes the addition of hexagonal ~N
(boron nitride) t:o iron-based powder mixtures to improve
machinability after sintering. By agglomerating very fine
F3N powder (0.05-1.0 um), it is passible to achieve a simi-
lar improvement of the machinability of iron-based powder
mixtures after sintering as t:ry the addition of MnS. How-
ever, the sintered strength is affected to a lesser extent
if a correct amount of ~~N powder is added, than when add-
ing MnSv. As in the case of MnS, BN additions do however
not make it possible in industrial production to machine
materials having a hardness above ''?.00 HV .
WO 91/14526 describes how small amounts of Te and/or
Se together with MnS are. used to improve the machinability
about twice in powder-metallurgical materials that are
3ifficult to machine. The addition of Te and/or Se is
already conflicting with envirar~rnetal considerations, i.n
that the hygienic limit values for these additives are
very low and there is a tendency towards ever more stri.n-
c~ent environmental regulations.
The ~ present invent .i~~ri p_z-ov ia~s a
powder to be added to an iron- or steel-based powder com-
position which after siratering gives improved machinabi-
lity in the resulting components. In particular, the

CA 02136097 2003-O1-20
22055-113
3
invention provides an agent improving the machinability of
materials which are difficult to machine, in this context
materials having a hardness above about 180 HV and a
strength above about 700 l~Pa, and being essentially free
from hard phase material.
The inventiorz a.lsc> provides a knachinability-
improving agent which but to a :>mal.l extent, or not at all,
affects the mechanical properties, such ~:zs strength and
dimensional change during sintering, of the sintered
component, and which is essentially har_m.ess to the
environment.
In one aspect: the invention prc:>vides an iron-based
powder composition essentially free from hard phase material
for compacting and sintering into products having enhanced
machinability, said composition comprisir~g, in addition to
iron, at least one of the al l.oying elc=me:uts C, P, Cr, Mn,
Cu, Ni and Mo, wherein the iron-based powder comprises 0.1-
0.5% by weight of CaF2 powder as an agent: for improving the
machinability, particles of the CaF'~ powder are not attached
to graphite particles, the CaF2 powder optionally is combined
with one or more conventional machinabi:lity-improving agents
and essentially no elementary sulfur :is present in the
agent (s) for improving the rtrachs.nabil.:i.ty of the sintered
products.
In a further aspect, the invention provides a
sintered product having enhanced mach~inal~>ility a.nd being
essentially free from hard phase materia:l., said product
comprising 0.1-1.2% by weigrvt C, 0-0.6% ~:>y weight P, 0-25%
by weight. Cr, 0-10% by weight Mn, C)-5% bxr weight Cu, 0-8 % by
weight N:i, 0-2 % by weight Mo, 0 . 1--0 . 6% b;~~~ weight CaF2 and the
balance to 100% being iron.

CA 02136097 2003-O1-20
22055-113
3a
In a still further aspect, the invention provides
the use of CaF2 particles which are not attached to graphite
particles for improving the machinability of sintered
products prepared from an ix-on or steel powder which is
essentially free from hard phase material..
The invention also pravides a method of improving
the machinability of sintered products, comprising adding
CaF2 particles, which are not attached to graphite particles,
to an iron or steel powder which is essentially free from
hard phase material, compacting the iron or steel powder to
a green body, and sintering the green body.
The invention is achieved by admixing to an iron-
based powder composition an agent containing calcium
fluoride particles. Ac:cord~.ng to the in~.rention, these
particles are essentially free (i..e. not attached to
graphite particles, see belc>w) and have ;:an average particle
size of less than 100 Vim. Preferably, the average particle
size ranges between 20 ~m and 7C> ~,m. If the particle size
becomes too large, the strerigth ef the sintered component
will be adversely affected and t:he machinability-improving
effect becomes unsatisfactory. Also when the powder
additive is too fine, the machinability--=improving effect
becomes insufficient. The calcium fluoride particles may be
of synthetic or natural origin. An especially preferred
starting material is f_ine~-grade fluorspaz:. The purity of
the calcium fluoride a=iso affects the mac~hinability-
improving effect, and :it has been found that the content of
impurities in the starting material used, such as fluorspar,
should not exceed 3% by weight, preferaba.y not 2% by weight.
According to the invention, the machinability-improving
calcium-fluoride-containing powder is adc:~ed to an iron or a
steel powder in an amount of about 0.1-0.6%, preferably
0.15-0.6% and most preferably 0.2-0.5% by weight of the

CA 02136097 2003-O1-20
22055-113
3b
powder composition. For contents below O.lo by weight of
CaF2, the machinabilit,y-improving effect becomes
insufficient, whereas for con-


WO 93J24260 . ~ ' PCTJSE93J00468
4
tents above 0.6$ by weight, CaF2 will have an adverse
effect on strength and dimensional change.
One field of use of systems with fluorine compounds
based an CaF2 involves solid :Lubricants for reducing the
friction between surfaces which are loadec~='.~it room tem
perature and at elevated temperatures. '~~' is reported
in "Some Improvements in Solid Lubrica~t~ Coatings for
High Temperature Operations", ASLE Transaction, Vol. 16/1,
pp. 42-49. The use of calcium fluoride as a lubricant in
powder-metallurgical material: with the primary aim of
improving wear-resistance in sintered products, such as
valve seats containing hard phase material, is also dis-
closed e.g. in US-A-4,274,876,, US-A-4,836,848, JP-A-53-
123314, SU 885-319, SU 1114-70, SU 1481-262, JP 63-42348
and EP 277 239.
SU 1585-069 teaches that additions of CaF2 and S can
be used for improving the machinability of powder-metal-
lurgical materials, but the addition of CaF2 is then very
high (2-3$). Otherwise, S is well known for improving the
machinability of both conventional and powder-metallurgi-
cal materials. This publication cannot thus be considered
to be of any major guidance to anyone skilled in the art
who intends to improve the machinability of powder-metal-
lurgical materials, since S would then first have to be
eliminated before essentially reducing the added amount
of CaF2. Even if the additive according to the present
invention can be combined with other conventional machin-
ability-improving additives, such as MnS, it preferably is
essentially free from elementary sulphur which, in addi-
tion to being environmentally undesirable, has a marked
effect on the dimensional change.
JP 63-137137 discloses the addition of CaF2 to iron-
based powder mixtures with a view to improving the machin-
ability of the components obtained after sintering, i.e.
the object is the same as in the present invention.
According to this Japanese patent application, however,
the calcium fluoride is not in free form when added to the


1i t
WO 93/24260 '1 ~ U ~ 9 ~ '~ ', r" ~~ ' PCT/SE93/00468
iron o~_~ steel composition, but it must be completely or
partly attached to graphite. The purpose of using fluoride
attached to graphite is to prevent the graphite from com-
pletely dissolving in the iron matrix. The undissolved
5 graphite then acts by forming a lubricating film between
the to«l~and the material during machining. Furthermore,
the Japanese application stipulates that relatively coarse
carbon particles be added, which adversely affects the
strengi~h of the final component. Thus, the Japanese appli-
cation does not in any way indicate that free calcium
fluoride particles would give improved machinability. The
advantages of the present invention over the invention
according to the Japanese application is that, in the pre-
sent invention, the step of fluoride absorbtion on carbon
is dispensed with, since c-rbon need not be used at all in
the invention, and if it . desirable to add carbon, finer
carbon particles can be used, which entails comparatively
improvE:d strength.
In addition to the additives as such, the present
invent~~on also encompasses iron- or steel-based powder
compositions containing the additives, as well as the sin
tered products produced from these compositions. It is
preferred that these powder compositions are essentially
free from hard phase material, since preliminary tests
have shown that the agent according to the present inven-
tion does not exhibit any marked machinability-improving
effect when hard phase material is included in the iron or
steel compositions. As used herein, "hard phase material"
relater to materials of non-metal having a hardness which
essent~~ally exceeds the hardness of alloyed metal, or
exceeds 800 microvickers. Examples of hard phase materials
are carbides, nitrides, oxides and borides.
The powder compositions according to the invention
may, in addition to iron and .additive, comprise other sub-
stances, such as C, P, Cr, Mn, Cu, Ni and/or Mo, which are
traditionally included in this type of powder compo-
sitions. Preferably, these substances are included in the


~1~609?
WO 93/24260 - PCT/SE93/00468
6
powder compositions in the following contents: 0.1-2$ by
weight C, 0-0.6$ by weight P, 0-25$ by weight Cr, 0-10$ by
weight Mn, 0-5$ by weight Cu, 0-8$ by weight Ni, and 0-2~
by weight Mo, the additive mentioned above being included
in an amount of 0.1-0.6$ by weight, pFeferably 0.15-0.6
and most preferably 0.2-0.5$ by weigh r~'.~?
According to a particular aspec~""bf the invention,
CaF2 is used in such known iron and.,,s'~teel compositions
which, before the conception of the-present invention,
were admixed with sulphur for improved machinability.
However, since sulphur causes swelling during sintering,
whereas CaF2 substantially does not affect the dimensions
during this step, these known compositions can be admixed
with another substance which, like sulphur, causes swell-
ing during sintering. An example of such a swelling
substance is MoS2, which may make up 0.05-0.5$ by weight,
preferably 0.1-0.3$ by weight of the iron-based
composition.
The powder-metallurgical manufacture of components by
means of the additive according to the invention is per-
formed in conventional manner, i.e. most often by the fol-
lowing process steps: The base powder, i.e. the iron or
steel powder, is admixed with desired alloying elements,
such as nickel, copper, molybdenum and optionally carbon
as well as the additive accx~rding to the invention in pow-
der form. This powder mixture is admixed with a conven-
tional lubricant prior to compacting, for instance zinc
stearate, which disappears during the subsequent sinter-
ing. Mixing is done to distribute the alloying elements
homogeneously in the material. The powder mixture is
thereafter compacted in a press tool yielding what is
known as a green body of close to final geometry. Compact-
ing generally takes place at a pressure of 400-800 MPa.
Higher compacting pressures only give an insignificant
increase of the density but essentially increased tool
wear. Lower compacting pressures entail densities which
are too low to be useful in most structural details. After

r ~
r .r
WO 93/24260 _ ~ 13 6 0 9 7 P~'/SE93/00468
7
compacting, the compact is sintered and is given its final
strength, hardness, elongation, etc. Sintering must take
place at a temperature above 1.083°C to make it possible to
use Cu as alloying element. In view of the rate of diffu-
sion in the material and the minimising of the sintering
time, a maximum, temperature is preferred. However, most of
the production furnaces can only cope with temperatures up
to 1150°C. Today;vthe commonest sinter:~ng temperature is
1120°C. At this temperature, desirable properties are
generally achieved after sintering for 30 min.
The present invention will be illustrated hereinafter
in a few non-limitative Examp7..es.
All the materials used ira these Examples are commer
cially available from Hoganas AH, Sweden, except for CaF2
which is a high-purity (99$ CaF2) fine-grade fluorspar
supplied by Indesko AH, Sweden. The materials in the fol-
lowing Examples have all been compacted at 600 MPa to
standardised tensile test bars according to ISO 2740-1973
and to .discs having a diameter of 50 mm and a height of
12 mm. 'fhe materials were sintered in a laboratory mesh
belt furnace at 1120°C for 30 min in endothermic atmos-
phere with a carbon potential corresponding to 0.5$. The
test bars were used to determine tensile strength accord-
ing to :EN 10002-1, hardness according to ISO 6507/1-1992
and dimensional change. The discs were used in drill tests
to determine the machinability index. This index is
defined as the average number of holes which six identical
drills ~~an make through six discs before the drills are
worn out. Drilling was performed with high-speed steel
drills at a constant speed and. a constant feed without any
coolant.
Example 1
Si:x different materials with compositions described
in Table 1 were mixed with additions of either MnS or CaF2
in order to evaluate the effects of the additives on the
mechanical properties and machinability. The MnS used was
a commercially available grade normally used for machin-




WO 93/24260 PCT/SE93/00468
213 6 ~ ~9'~
8
ability-enhancing purposes. The CaF2 was sieved on a 63 um
sieve, and the fine fraction was used. The materials were
processed according to the description above, except for
the Fe + 0.6% P material, which was sintered in dissociat-
ed ammonia. As can be seen in Table~~, there is a larger
improvement in machinability for ~f~~~ materials containing
CaF2 than for the materials conL'ning MnS as compared
with the reference. The tensil~e,strength is significantly
less affected by the CaF2 addition than the MnS addition,
and there is smaller dimensional change for the CaF2 as
compared with the reference.
Example 2
A material Fe + 4$ Ni + 1.5$ Cu + 0.5$ Mo + 0.5$ C
was mixed with different amounts of <63 um CaF2. The
material was processed acccording to the description
above, and machinability and tensile strength were mea-
sured. The material without any addition of CaF2 had a
tensile strength of 736 MPa, a hardness of 205 HV 10, and
a machinability index of 4. The results are presented in
Fig. 1. As can be seen in Fig. 1, the machinability is
significantly increased when CaF2 is added in the amounts
falling within the scope of the invention. As can also be
seen in Fig. 1, the tensile strength decreases with
increasing amounts of CaF2 down to a level which is
unacceptable.
Example 3
A material Fe + 4$ Ni + 1.5% Cu + 0.5$ Mo + 0.5$ C
was mixed with 0.3% CaF2 which was sieved to different
particle or grain sizes. The maximum grain sizes were
ranging from 20 um to 150 um. The materials were processed
according to the description above, and machinability and
tensile strength were measured and are presented in Fig.
2. The material without any addition of CaF2 had a tensile
strength of 736 MPa, a hardness of 205 HV 10, and a
machinability index of 4. The machinability is highest
when the maximum CaF2 grain size is between 30 um and
100 pm. The influence of tensile strength is decreasing



WO 93/24260 213 6 0 9 7 P~T/SE93/00468
9
with increasing maximum grain size, but it is not until
the maximum grain size exceeds 140 pm that the drop in
tensile strength becomes unacceptable. The average grain
size ranges between half and 2/3 of the maximum grain
size.
15
25
35

CA 02136097 2003-O1-20
22055-113
:L 0
v


' i O



U


-r-I i


d~00 O ~~ h N l~ \f1N i O ~ W
((j d~ QO -I I


N \p ,1 y O r1M M O r-1N 01N ~r
~i r-Ir-I r-ir-i ~ )


~ r riI r1N (U r~
r1


! l~ (a


U


I


.1~ t~


l


0 0 0 0 00 0 o 0 0 0 0 ~'!'='o 0 0 0
'o LIl;'
I d
l0


o>~ h N cN l0Ol~ LflN l0I M Olv71 . ; 10O
O


~ O 1J
N N N N r-IN N N N N r-iri ~ t~'I N M v W
j M
~


r1 '-f~ U .L.~ W
~ i


I O


_
i ... ~.-_- ~- i ~ ~
I


v W U


l0,-Ii M LOlD LnO t.1?I'I t11 47CC3~~ C~OJO1 -ri
M O 00 M l0O r-1l0OM I O -iN a1-I'(j
N I N I i ~
d~ f11 ~
: M
O
~
r-I


h h h \otnvo \otwoov 0o ~rr ch tn, .
ao d~ rr~ ~ .,
~ ~ w O


H j I I ~ I
I


t ~ ~
t


__.I-, -._ ~,'
~ - ~ -
j


Pa Lfl01N MI~d' O O['d~O Vii N ~ LI1 r-i
M 00 ~~~[ N


O O 01O 00ODd0 ODl~h~ M r-i r1lIl.
-I ~ 1M [ 1f7 I~h
N d~ '
! h
N '
I


N i N ri~-I~--I~ ~-I~ r-tN N N r-Ir-iU1 r~'t
, N ~ r-I I
~ N '
!
N
[
I
-d
;
~
~


J I ~ r-~ ~ 4-1
r ..


0't U rtS O
O


. i ~
I


-E---~ --j r-
~ -. 1
O'1
.~
1J


M j
S-1
tA
N


I i ~
U m tn~ c~u1~o o m r- M i
i i ;~
~ ; ~'
~ M ~-1
~ cn ~i
' N
mn ri
'. ~
di d~
I
b
''i
'~
-'~
a-'


v-I O O O O OO O 0101 O I
\ O Ii O
O i ~
C1y ~I
ri ~
~~ ~
O ~
I i
p -


I .1
h h h h hh h ~ -I
0 l0 ' ~
' ~ fl)
h h fIS
' h (a
l'"~ ' ,~:
' ~ (d
l 1J
I U7
h I'~
:


p I , .O
.~
a
.~
a1
O


I '
~


! ' .~
O5 ,
.~
.~
v


- ~..~- ~
E.., ~ _ s~
~ a
N
~
~-t
W

.


h h u7 h NM , 40 ~
' , 01 "
01 (T '
~


cr~ u7 .u
d'M d' N MM ~ d' .,
\o '~II7' t!7 G
M 1 IIS
O i M
d' O
' O
U7 '
cb 'v
O v
~ ~
v
J
1


M ,M 0 ~ ~--i , ~.
r"r r-i -
' ao
~ 00
~


' ,.
~ . . - p. , . . , O
O O O O O ~, ,. ,
~~ : O
O O JLJ
O O J..)
I N
O' -J.J
O r-1
O-


, ,.
i ~ ~ ~ ii O O O i ~
~ i i
i i U1
; 1 U1
! r-~
U7
~-1
Ul


. -rl
i ~ U!
i U
~


_. v
,. v
U)
N
f
i
r~


r~
I ri
t_.i
r-I
~


,, . '.N
~ , : ~ .r1
' ' ,-I
N
-r1
!J
.~;


N ~ ~.,C~
: U7
U1
1-~
U7


~ G ~
~


~ 4 ow
U ~ ~ -
- 1J
~ y.!
~'.a
J-1
.1..1


ow N N r7.
U InM ~.Cra ~ a 1~
, ~ w S-1
i ..
f~ 4J
o\ v
O
Ol
N


n ~ ~U ~iU tn o;o
~ 0
~~


t c~ o0 '~ . +
~ + O\ \ '' o .u
U1 ' i .u
o o
I .u
~
4


U L U o , U
O U M LO ~ ''-.I
. ~ ~1
' I o\o
M ;
' :~
~
+


+ owU d .~ ow. + ~ u1
O tn~ tno tn~: N j O
, O ~ O
O U U1
U '~' O
o= ~ b


o o rs.~; I ~
+ +w n ~iw~
U ICI m~
+ ~i v
~ o
tn w N


o o Uo o w u I +
+ owo + j ~ ~'
o W "~
o ~ ~'
~~ ~.'
i O
I L;
rtf


r-y ~ 0 + -r~tn~ W o , ~ ~
o ~ ~
0 ~
p :~ U
n ~ N
~ w ~
~ u~ Oo
N .
,
+


-~ z Z O' o O ~ U
~ o ~ ' , tP
_ ~ \
+ ; ~i
~ ~ Ul
_', td
' Gi
~ (Ii
>


, + > o> o o>o O 1 m
~ -ri I I N
, ~
U ~
o N
01
~
c~


~-I ow N + N + U .
~ uW + . ~ o
~ I f ~
+ + ,-i
Z . v
: (,) ~
v ' ~
+ v


v n + r~H + ~ w
~ o z o o
w ;
! P,
w
'
~


o U~ N +
o ~ v ~ V +Iw
, ~u,
N +
w


v
+ t o1N\ o\N i.n U ~
' .~ ~ -r1
o\~> ~ 'Cj
+ I N
-r-1 ~ N
Ii L;
lea 1.1
~ '
'


tIl+N U7+ "~- o\N
N I r-I
O O U
~ I (U
Z ~'' ,
+ -s.


+ tUno ~ oo ' o , n ~
p - ~
~ ~ ~
~ m ~
<,\
w, ,
.+
i


~ o w~ U ~ , -r~
n ~~ ,
'~!+ + tn
~ v
~ -
w S~
-
~
~~>
u~


r + + f ri;i.
' ow iv' rtf
~'O ~ ~
w r''
c~~
Gm
s7~


w ~ ~ W ntn v tn 0 +i.
~ ~ ~ ~ u, , +
n ,~
o -ri
i v
~ v
r~
a


a'_~+ ~~ ~ a ;~~
o o '~, i
O ~. U
+ ~n
\ .~
~~ -a
~
,~
-r~
'~


v z ~~ ++ ++ ~, o\w
~ ~, vv
' v
'


f~owZ vp~ v . , ~
U ~ u,~
I ~ r~
o + ~
~
v


'd~d, ~C~ ~ + h ,
: ' ~ ,
Ch ! .
- = h
~ ~ '
+ 1.1
J-1
-r1
1.1
.S
i
N
(IS
r-I


Q) ' J-1
i w + ~..I
~ G'
-r-I
ri
~
U~
Ul
O
Ul
1
-rl
S-1
4


; ~ .
I ' .
' +
I -~
, ~
I '~
-rl
U1
U!
~
'Cj


I


J _ _.~_ '
.._._ _~'._-._...
_
__.




Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date 2004-01-27
(86) PCT Filing Date 1993-05-27
(87) PCT Publication Date 1993-12-09
(85) National Entry 1994-11-17
Examination Requested 1999-12-23
(45) Issued 2004-01-27
Deemed Expired 2012-05-28

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Application Fee $0.00 1994-11-17
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 2 1995-05-29 $100.00 1994-12-07
Registration of a document - section 124 $0.00 1995-06-01
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 3 1996-05-27 $100.00 1996-05-03
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 4 1997-05-27 $100.00 1997-04-28
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 5 1998-05-27 $150.00 1998-05-04
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 6 1999-05-27 $150.00 1999-05-04
Request for Examination $400.00 1999-12-23
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 7 2000-05-29 $150.00 2000-05-04
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 8 2001-05-28 $150.00 2001-05-09
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 9 2002-05-27 $150.00 2002-05-07
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 10 2003-05-27 $200.00 2003-04-30
Final Fee $300.00 2003-11-12
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 11 2004-05-27 $250.00 2004-05-06
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 12 2005-05-27 $250.00 2005-05-02
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 13 2006-05-29 $250.00 2006-05-04
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 14 2007-05-28 $250.00 2007-05-04
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 15 2008-05-27 $450.00 2008-04-22
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 16 2009-05-27 $450.00 2009-05-14
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 17 2010-05-27 $450.00 2010-05-14
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
HOGANAS AB
Past Owners on Record
ANDERSSON, OWE
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Representative Drawing 1998-07-27 1 15
Claims 2003-01-20 2 89
Drawings 2003-01-20 2 36
Claims 2003-05-06 2 80
Representative Drawing 2003-06-16 1 11
Description 2003-01-20 12 579
Cover Page 2003-12-30 1 40
Cover Page 1995-12-20 1 37
Abstract 1995-12-20 1 84
Claims 1995-12-20 2 130
Drawings 1995-12-20 3 232
Description 1995-12-20 9 706
Claims 2000-01-19 2 70
Assignment 1994-11-17 6 226
PCT 1994-11-17 16 608
Prosecution-Amendment 1999-12-23 1 46
Prosecution-Amendment 2000-01-25 2 93
Prosecution-Amendment 2002-07-22 2 41
Prosecution-Amendment 2003-01-20 11 445
Prosecution-Amendment 2003-04-29 1 30
Prosecution-Amendment 2003-05-06 2 72
Correspondence 2003-11-12 1 33
Fees 1997-04-28 1 33
Fees 1996-05-03 1 31
Fees 1994-12-07 1 34