Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
2163210
vo 94/26792 PCT/US94/05550
Title: PROCESS FOR DEACTIVATING TRANSITION METAL
CATALYSTS
s
TEC~IN~CAL ~ELD
0 The present invention relates generally to processes for catalyst
deactivation. More specifically, the present invention concerns a process for
deactivating transition metal catalysts, employing thermal decomposition and airoxidation.
lS BACKGROUND
There are many processes for m~nllfacturing polyolefins such as
polyethylene, polypropylene, ethylene propylene rubber. Catalysts or initiators
convert olefins, and optionally comonomers, into polyolefins. Development of
new, better performing, less costly polyolefins has often been a result of catalyst
development.
Polyolefin catalysts, such as Ziegler-Natta catalysts systems, are transition
metal compounds like transition metal halides or transition metal alkoxy halides.
These transition metal compounds are co-catalyzed with alllminllm alkyls to form a
catalyst system. It is estimated that close to 9,000 tons of Ziegler-Natta type
2~ catalysts were manufactured in 1992 to meet the worldwide capacity demand for
polyolefins.
Metallocene compounds co-catalyzed with alumoxane compounds form the
basis for another polyolefin catalyst system based on transition metal compoundsand ~ minum compounds. Examples ofthe latter are U. S. patent 4,937,299 and
EPA 0-129368 to Ewen, et al. and U. S. patent 4,808,561 to Welborn, Jr.
Catalysts tend to be active chemical compounds and those most often used
for polyolefin formation are based on one or more transition metals. Many such
catalysts are pyrophoric, igniting on contact with air and/or moisture. The active
chemical characteristics of these catalysts make them desirable and useful as
3s polyl.~e,i,alion catalysts.
2t~3210
WO 94/26792 PCT/US9 1/05550--
Deactivation and subsequent disposal of active catalysts is a problem. This
problem is caused by catalyst m~nnf~ctllre that results in catalysts that do not meet
the m~nllfacturer's specifications, or even meeting those specifications, they may
not meet the performance specifications of the catalyst user. Also, after
5 polymerization, "heels" of active catalyst remain after polymer discharge from a
reaction vessel. These "heels" are catalysts that are still active. Additionally, under
normal m~nllf~ctllring techniques, more catalysts will be produced than used. All
of these situations result in active catalysts that must be disposed of safely.
Catalyst deactivation techniques are known. For example, flooding with
0 water, alcohol, or similar liquid treatments cause the active chemicals of thecatalyst to react violently with the flooding medium and/or themselves, resulting in
inert or relatively inert substances. The flooding medium may be removed from the
now inert or relatively inert catalyst components or alternatively the flooding
me-lium and the deactivated catalyst are kept together for disposal.
Often after such flooding, the catalyst is no longer pyrophoric, and
the.erore relatively safe for disposal.
However, the flooding me~ lm after catalyst contact, contains components
that result from contact with and reaction with the catalyst. The flooding medium,
after catalyst contact, may have a flash point that is lowered by volatile organic
chemicals and a pH that is slightly to highly acidic.
A waste stream with a low flash point and low pH, will likely be
categorized as hazardous. Such hazardous categorization will result in increaseddisposal costs. Such costs are çscal~tinsg as environmental laws become more
stringent.
In addition to flooding, other catalyst deactivation techniques, such as by
exposure to air/oxygen, may be used. This technique, like flooding, causes the
active chemicals of the catalyst to react violently, resulting in inert or relatively
inert substances. This method, because of the violent reaction, is useful only for
very small amounts of catalyst. This method may be preferably used for small
amounts of catalyst, such as might be rem~ining on vessel walls a~er removal of a
batch of catalyst.
It would be desirable to have a process that would allow catalyst
deactivation at lower cost and fewer potential environment~l concerns than
previous deactivation methods.
2163210
~0 94/26792 PCT/US94/05S50
SUMMAR~
Our invention is directed to a process for deactivating transition metal
t catalysts (typically such catalysts are usedf to catalyze polymerization of olefins),
catalyst systems or catalyst components (hereafter referred to as "catalyst(s)").
The process comprises heating, preferably carried out in the absence of air,
(incl~l~lin~ elemental oxygen and water vapor) as air may cause spontaneous
ignition or violent reaction when cont~ctin~ many transition metal catalysts. Anenvironment, such as nitrogen, argon, or a vacuum, that is subst~nti~lly non-
reactive to the catalyst is pl erel, ed. In other words, the catalyst should be heated
lo in an environment which is substantially unreactive (inert) with the catalyst (e.g., a
vacuum or nitrogen atmosphere).
The heating should be conducted at or above a temperature sufficient to
decompose or render less chemically active, the active chemical compounds of thecatalyst, and/or place them in a state where they do not react violently or ignite
upon contact with air andlor water. The heating step should also volatilize volatile
compounds, such as solvents used in catalyst m~n~lf~cture.
The heating step should be carried out in a manner that will n~ "~;7e the
formation of unwanted chemicals such as halogenated hydrocarbons. Heating can
be safely carried out in a nitrogen atmosphere at a tel~-pe~ re between about 30
C and about 1000 C, preferably between about 30 C and 300 C. Exposing the
heated catalyst to air, air with water vapor, steam or water (hereinafter "air"), may
be safely conducted after the heating step.
Heating can be carried out in several ways. A preferred method is stepwise
or gradual he~ting A first step may be to temperatures of from about 40 to about2s 110 C, then holding or m~int~ining a temperature high enough to drive off
volatiles, but not so high that substantial quantities of undesirable compounds, such
as halogenated hydrocarbons or elemental chlorine, are formed.
A second step comprises heating gradually from the temperature of the first
step to a temperature generally up to at least 150 C. A third step comprises
heating to a temperature that is selected by determining the temperature needed to
convert active catalyst compounds to non-reactive or relatively non-reactive
compounds. Each temperature step is conducted over a time period and
temperature to insure that, after the final heating step and holding step,
subst~nti~lly all of the volatiles are driven off, a minimllm of unwanted compounds
3~ are generated, and the catalyst, catalyst system or catalyst components are sl.l,sl~nl;~lly deactivated.
2163210
WO 94/26792 PCT/US94/05550--
Exposure of the catalyst to air may further c`onvert any reln~ining partially
inactivated chemical compounds to, for instance, oxides which are subst~nti~lly
non reactive to ambient air. .,
Accordingly, our invention permits active transition metal polyolefin
5 catalyst deactivation, where products driven off during heating may be vented to a
flare, or some other means of safely disposing of the products well known to those
in the relevant art. The solids rem~inin~ after heating are subst~nti~lly unreactive,
or if somewhat reactive, will react safely with elemental oxygen and water vapor in
air to further move them to a substantially unreactive state. The solids may then be
0 disposed of safely.
These, and other features, aspects and advantages of the present invention
will become better understood with reference to the following description and
appended claims.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DR~WINGS
For a better underst~ntling of the present invention, reference is made to the
drawings, for which:
Figure 1 shows a schematic drawing of a dry catalyst deactivation process,
incorporating a preferred embodiment of the present invention relating to
20 Experiment I.
Figure 2 shows a schematic of a second catalyst deactivation process,
incorporating a further preferred embodiment of the present invention, relating to
Experiment II.
These drawings are not intended to in any way define the present invention,
2s but are provided solely for the purpose of illustrating certain preferred
embodiments and applications of the present invention.
DESCRIPTION
The present invention concerns a deactivation process for transition metal
30 catalysts, catalyst systems, or catalyst components by heating an active catalyst in
an inert environment. Such catalysts, catalyst systems or catalyst components are
often used to catalyze olefin polymerization reactions. Following is a detailed
description of certain preferred deactivation processes. Those skilled in the art will
appreciate that numerous modifications to these preferred embo~iments can be
35 made without departing from the scope of the invention. To the extent that our
description is specific, this is solely for the purpose of illustrating preferred
~ 216-3210
931~017R}',DOC/DL~' -
_ S _
embodiments of our invention and should not be taken as limiting our invention to
these specific embo-liments
Overview
- A process according to the present invention for deactivating a transition
5 metal polyolefin catalyst, comprises heating the catalyst in an environment
subst~nti~lly free from air, especially el~ment~l oxygen and water vapor that may
be contained in air.
Heating causes the active, corrosive, volatile compounds contained in a
catalyst to become totally or partially inactive or inert, non-corrosive or less10 corrosive, and wholly or partially vol~tili7es, volatile compounds. Care must be
taken that the rise in temperature from ambient conditions be controlled to drive
off substantially all hydrocarbons or other volatile organic chemicals. If the
temperature rise is not controlled, the catalyst ~,vill still become deactivated, but a
significant possibility of creation of halogenated hydrocarbons or other by-products
15 exists. Such halogenated hydrocarbons present greater difficulty of disposition
than volatile non-halogenated hydrocarbons.
After the heating step is complete, the catalyst may be safely exposed to air,
air inchlding water vapor, steam, or water. Moreover, exposure to air, a~er
heating can be helpful in converting compounds or complexes formed by heating to20 form oxides, or hydroxides, through reaction with elemental oxygen and water
vapor in air. Such oxides or hydroxides, or other substantially inert or nearly inert,
non-reactive or nearly non-reactive, non-corrosive or subst~nti~lly non-corrosive
substances, are formed through their reaction with air.
Transition metal catalyst preparation is well-known in the art. Examples of
25 catalysts and/or catalyst systems useful for polyolefin m~nllf~cture include Ziegler-
Natta and Metallocene-Alumoxane types. A traditional Ziegler-Natta catalyst is asystem co"~ tit~nillm and/or van~ m as the transition metals normally
supported on silica and/or MgCI2 and sometimes incorporating electron donors and alllminllm alkyls. A metallocene is an organometallic coordination (catalyst)
30 compound obtained as a cyclopentadienyl derivative of a transition metal or metal
halide. An Alumoxane is an organo alllminllm compound, and is used as a co-
cataixst with the metallocene. Such catalyst or catalyst system may be selected
from the group consisting of a Ziegler-Natta catalyst, a Ziegler-Natta catalyst
system, a Ziegler-Natta catalyst component, a metallocene catalyst, a metallocene-
35 alumoxane catalyst system, and a metallocene-alumoxane catalyst system
component. Many of these catalysts or catalyst systems, or even their components
REPLACEMENT PAGE
-- ` 216321~
93B017R~.DOC/DLP
- 6 -
ignite spontaneously in air, react violently with water, acids, alcohols, halogens and
amines. The present invention shall be generally referred to herein as a catalyst
deactivation process.
- A plere,led embodiment of our invention is intended to cover as substantially dry deactivation of all transition metal polyolefin catalysts, including
prepolymerized catalyst types, to minimi7e disposal costs. This process does notrequire the use of water or other liquids.
In an alternative embodiment, controlled amounts of water vapor, or
controlled amounts of air or elemental oxygen, or combinations of these react~nt.s
lo may be added during the heating, or in place of the heating step. Further, amounts
of any material reactive with the catalyst may be added. Such an addition may
cause an exothermic reaction with the catalyst or catalyst system which could drive
off volatile compounds. However, the invention can assume many other
embotlimçnt~ and be used for a deactivation of variety of catalysts. To the extent
that the following description details a specific embodiment of a catalyst
deactivation process, this is by way of illustration rather than limitation.
In one embodiment, a Ziegler-Natta catalyst is m~mlf~ctl~red by techniques
well known in the industry, and may be prepared by forrning a precursor from; a
magnesium compound, a tit~nillm compound, and an electron donor compound,
diluting the precursor with an inert carrier and activating with an organo~lnminllm
compound as described in U.S. Patent number 4,302,566. Metallocene-alumoxane
catalysts can be prepared by reacting methylalumoxane (~AO) with dehydrated
silica (SiO2) and contacting the SiO2 - MAO complex with a metallocene.
Metallocene-alumoxane catalyst synthesis or m~n~lf~cture is described in U. S.
2s Patent Numbers 4,752,597 and 4,808,561, and in published European application
EP-A-123-368 B1. Deactivation of such catalysts or catalyst systems prior to
disposal, is among the objects of this invention.
In general, we have found that an active catalysts, m~int~ined in an inert or
non-reactive environment that is substantially unreactive with the catalyst, andheated, will be deactivated by thermally decomposing or vol~tili7ing the catalyst
components. By subst~nti~lly unreactive or inert with the catalyst, or inert to the
catalyst, we intend that the catalyst will not react with the environment. Such an
environment can be a vacuum or a range of Noble gasses, however nitrogen or
argon are p-erelled.
3s The unreactive environment is chosen to minimi7e production of corrosive
or harmful compounds during he~ting, and minimi7es the potential of auto ignition
REPLACEMENT PAGE
r ^ ~ 1 ~i 3 2 1 0
93B0 17RP.DOC/DLP
- 7 -
or violent reaction. Examples of environments that will be substantially unreactive
with the catalyst are a vacuum, the noble gasses, nitrogen, argon7 krypton, xenon,
neon, and helium.
During heating, the temperature is raised to a level to totally or partially
volatilize volatile species such as, for example; inert hydrocarbons having for
instance carbon numbers of 2 to 12, hydrogen, entrained solvents, ethylene,
hexene, isopentane, tetrahydrofuran and gaseous HCI or Cll.
During the heating, volatile substances are evolved. ~t is important that the
heating be carried out in a manner to l~ini~ e or e~ e reactions that could
lo produce corrosive or harmful products. Accordingly, in a preferred embodiment, a
slow rise in temperature such as 10 C per hour until the temperature reaches from
about 150 C to about 250 C.
Substances evolved must be safely disposed of, for instance, by scrubbing
or neutralizing any acidic materials, and burning any volatile substances such that
5 the combustion products of these substances are substantially non-hazardous ornon-polluting. The volatiles and/or gases may be continuously purged to a flare
during the heating process, or sent to a flare a~er the heating is substantiallycomplete.
In a more preferred embodiment, a step-wise temperature elevation is used.
20 The temperature is elevated gradually in the first step, to about 100 C. In the
second step, the tenlL)e-~ re is raised to about 150 C, and the third step, to about
200 C. The highest temperature should be m~int~inecl for a period of from about4 hours to 30 hours, preferably from 10 to 25 hours, and most preferably for 15 to
25 hours. The combination of ultimate temperature and the length of time at that25 temperature will be determined by catalyst type and amount. The combination of
temperature and time should be sufficient to decompose, volatilize,
disproportionate, or otherwise render the catalyst substantially non-reactive, most
especially to air.
More ple~lled, the catalyst is raised from ambient temperature to about
30 100 C, using a gradual temperature increase of an average of 5 C per hour, and
more preferably about 10 C per hour.
~: Following the temperature rise to about 100 C, the temperature is held for
up to about 10 hours, preferably up to about 5 hours, more preferably up to about
2 hours, or a sufficient time to ensure that s-lbstantially all of the hydrocarbons are
35 vol~tili7ed
REPLACEMENT PAGE
~ 21 63~1 0
93B017Rp.DOClDLP
- 8
The catalyst temperature is then raised in timed increments, for example,
about 10 C per hour, until the maximum desired temperature is achieved.
Throughout the heating process, in addition to vol~tili7~tion, disproportionation,
decomposition, and thermal decomposition occur. The heating may comprise the
5 steps of:
(a) heating said catalyst to 100 C from ambient temperature, at the
rate of 10 C per hour;
(b) holding the catalyst of step (a) at a temperature in the range of from
90 to 110 C for a time period sufficient to volatilize subst~nti~lly all hydrocarbons;
lo (c) heating the catalyst of step (b) to a temperature of 200 C.
For purposes of this invention, decomposition shall be defined as a
filn-l~m~nt~l type of chemical change. In simple decomposition, one substance
breaks down into two simpler subst~nce.e, e.g., water yields hydrogen and oxygen.
In double decomposition, two compounds break do~,vn and reco,.,bh1e to form two
15 ~ enl compounds.
Thermal decomposition shall be defined as heating in the absence of air.
At the m~illlulll temperature, the catalyst is held for a period of at least 4
hours. The minimllm holding time being defined by determination that subst~nti~lly
all reactions are completed or s~bst~nti~lly completed. Completion being defined20 as the active compounds being subst~nti~lly decomposed, ~hat is the decomposition
reactions are carried to completion. For example, if after 4 hours all active
compounds have been thermally decomposed, holding for longer periods is merely
a matter of convenience andlor energy consumption.
In most cases, dependent upon catalyst type and amount, the maximum
2s time period for holding at the maximum temperature will be up to about 48 hou rs,
preferably up to about 24 hours, and more preferably up to about 12 hours. The
criteria for detelll~inillg the length of time is dependent upon the thermal
decomposition reactions known or thought to be controlling. An embodiment
incllldes holding the catalyst at a temperature offrom 180 C to 300 C for a
30 period in the range of from 4 hours to 30 hours. Those skilled in the art will
appreciate that other time and temperature combinations may achieve the desired
end~result of a deactivated catalyst.
The exact composition of the active species responsible for olefin
polymerization is not known. However, during the heating of the catalyst in the
35 deactivation process, complexes are decomposed and formed. The conditions forcomplex forrnation and stabilities are well known. Such complex formation,
REPLACEMENT PAGE
21632~0
. .
- r - r r r
93B017RP.DOCIDLP ~
_ 9 _
decomposition and disproportionation are the result of active catalyst componentcompounds reacting to heat.
Examples of the controlling reactions, in deactivation of a typical gas phase
fl~ i7ed bed reaction for production of polyethylene, the following reactions may
s be controlling in the decomposition of the catalyst:
Disproportionation:
150-200 C
o2TiCl3 THF > TiCl4(THF)2 + TiC12
Thermal decomposition:
100 C
15 TEAL (C2H5)3 Al > Al + H2 + C2H4
loo~ c
~HAL (C6HI3)3 Al > Al + H2 + C6HI2
165 C
DEAC (C2H5)3 Al , Al + HCL + C2H4
The maximum temperature reached must at least provide, that subst~nti~lly
all of the thermal decomposition devol~tili7ing~ and disproportionation has
occurred. This temperature will be generally from about 150 C to about 1000 C,preferably about 180 C to about 500 C, more preferably from about 180 C to
about 300 C. The process should be carried out such that neither the heating nor
subsequent combustion of the volatiles in a flare, cause substantial formation of
unacceptable materials, as for instance, chlorinated hydrocarbons.
Illustrative, non-limiting examples of the features and practice of the
invention are set forth below.
EXAMPLE 1
,
100 grams of an active dry catalyst was heated in a 500 cc, stainless steel
vessel, using a fitted heating mantle. A diagram of the experimental equipment is
shown in Figure 1. The catalyst was a mixture of MgCl2, TiCI3 l/3 AICI3,
tetrahydrofuran (THF), diethyl ~ mim~m chloride (C2H5)2 AICI (DEAC), trinormal
REPLACEMENT PAGE
r ~ 2 1 6 3 2 1 0
r ~ r
938017Rp.DOC/DLP
- 10 -
hexyl ~luminllm (THNAL), triethyl al~lminum (C2Hs)3 Al (TEAL), silicon dioxide
- (SiO2) and isopentane. A description of a method of making this catalyst is
described in European Patent Application l~umber EPO 369 436 A2.
- Vapors or by-products from the heat treatment of the catalyst were
s collected in a 75 cc stainless steel vessel cooled to -78 C using a dry ice/acetone
bath. Heating tape was wrapped around the tubing leading to the cold trap to
prevent vapor con~len.c~tion in the lines. Two glass vessels, each cont~ining 100 cc
of a 10 weight percent NaOH solution were connected in series to trap any HCl
gases evolved.
0 The catalyst was subjected to a heat treatment of 200 C under a nitrogen
flow for 24 hours. After cooling to room temperature, the tared vessel cont~ininsJ
the catalyst was weighed and the rem~inin~ catalyst was weighed and the catalystweight loss determined. The cold trap was isolated and its contents weighed.
Samples from the caustic solution were analyzed, the analysis is shown in Table 1.
A sample of the catalyst heated under nitrogen was also analyzed. The results are
shown in Tables 2 and 3.
The original experimental set-up was re~sembled using a new cold trap
and caustic solutiolls, and an air flow at room temperature was passed over the
catalyst for 24 hours. Deactivated catalyst and caustic solution samples were
analyzed, the results are shown in Tables 2 and 3.
EXAMPLE 2
Example 2 was similar to Example 1, except that a NaHCO3 bed was
installed between the catalyst vessel and the dry ice/acetone cold trap as shown in
Figure 2. The catalyst was subjected to the same thermal treatment/deactivation
process as described in Example 1, and samples were analyzed after the same timeperiods and temperature conditions as Example 1. The results of the analysis areshown in Table 2.
REPLACEMENT PAGE
lO 94/26792 , 2 1 6 3 2 1 0 PCT/US94/05550
TABLE 1
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION p~ Cl ppm
First caustic after N2/heat cycle 13.5 < 20
2 Second caustic after N2/heat cycle 13.5 < 20
0 3 First caustic after air purge 13.47 < 20
4 Second caustic after air purge 13.57 < 20
Control (caustic) 13.57 < 20
lS
TABLE 2
COMPOUND ANALYSES OF CATALYST SAMPLES
Description C H Cl Al Mg Ti
Starting Catalyst 17.99 2.97 10.91 4.35 1.76 1.06
AflcerN2/Heat Cycle5.96 0.62 12.32 4.09 1.75 1.21
No NaHCO3
(Example 1)
APcer Air/RT Purge
No NaHCO3 6.96 0.91 12.22 5.01 1.84 1.22
(Example 1)
After N2/Heat Cycle
throughNaHCO3 bed 7.89 0.82 11.74 3.93 1.77 0.96
3S (Example 2)
After Air/R T Purge
throughNaHCO3 bed 9.37 1.54 11.15 4.66 1.75 1.14
(Example 2)
WO 94/26792 2 1 6 3 21 0 12 - PCT~US94/05~50 -
TABLE 3
COMPOSITION OF CATALYST BEFORE AND AFTER
DEACTIVATION(1)
Compound Weight Percent(2) Mole Percent Mole Ratio
before after before after before after
Ti 1.06 1.22 0.022 0.025 1.00 1.00
Mg 1.76 1.84 0.072 0.076 3.27 3.04
Al 4.35 5.01 0.161 0.186 7.32 7.44
Cl 10.9112.22 0.308 0.345 14.00 13.80
T~IF 13.001.30 0.181 0.018 8.20 0.72
Before Deactivation After Deactivation
TiMg3 2~AI7 32C1~4 oo(THF)8.20 TiMg3 04AI7 44Cl~3 go(THF)0 72
(1) Final deactivated catalyst air purged.
(2) Silica and free hydrocarbons not included.
EXAMPLE 3
99.1 grams of catalyst [bis(n-butyl-cyclopenta-dienyl)zirconium
30 dichloride/methyalumoxane/silica] was added to a 500 cc stainless steel cylinders.
The catalyst was heated slowly under a stream of nitrogen from 40 C to 200 C in
3 hours and m~int~i~ed at 200 C for another 20 hours. The vent ofthe appa,~t~lswas connected to a dry ice/acetone cold trap in which all vented materials were
collected. The weight of materials collected in the cold trap was found to be 11.3
3s grams. The weight of the catalyst in the 500 cc stainless steel cylinder after heating
under N2 was 87.4 grams. The catalyst weight loss of 11.7 grams was in
agreement with what had been collected in the cold trap. After removing a samplefor analysis, the catalyst in the cylinder was exposed to gas at room temperature,
first as a 50/50 (volume ratio) N2/Air mixture then as a 100% air to complete
40 deactivation. The temperature rose by about 5 C, but no violent reaction was
v 2 1 6 3 2 1 0 PCT/USg4/0~550
o 94/26792 - 1 3
detected indicating that fl~mm~ble, volatile hydrocarbons had been removed during
the N2/heating step.
Analyses of the starting and heat treated catalyst samples are shown in
Table 4, indicating reduction of weight percent carbon and hydrogen in the sample
respectively from 9.01 and 1.65 to 2.49 and 0.98.
TABLE 4
(WEIGHT PERCENT)
,~
ELEMENT C H Zr Al
SAMPLE
Starting Catalyst
(Example 3) 9.01 1.65 0.31 7.23
Catalyst of
Example 3 5.88 1.32 0.32 7.35
+ heat + N2
Catalyst of
Example 3 2.49 0.98 0.30 7.12
+heat+N2+air
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the processes described in
Examples 1, 2 and 3 can be scaled up to deactivate catalysts in commercial
quantities.
DISCUSSlON:
A sçhem~tic of the products and intermediums formed during the
deactivation process is shown below:
WO 94/26792 2 ~ 6 3 2 ~ ~ PCT/US94/055~0--
- 14 -
The following is a description of the product distribution found as a result
of a process similar to Examples 1 and 2.
DRY CATALYST DEACTIVA llON PROCESS-PRODUCT DISTRIBUllON
l~lTL~L ZEGLER-NAl~A CATALYST ~QB~
STEP I
MgC12, TiC13~AlC13, THF, I-Cs, olefins, H2,
SiO2,MgC12(lHF)2~ Heat to 180-200 C ,~ hy.l.~l~.,s isomers,
TiC13(THF)3, THF, I-Cs ~ chlorinated h~hu~l,u--~
DEAC, TNHAL, TEAL lulder N2 5t~m~Cl7llpre \~
~AT TREATED CATALYST
TiC12, TiC13, MgC12
IHF, Al, AIC13
DEACTIVAIED CATALYST
Step 2
TiC12, TiC120 ,~
Mg(OH)CI, Al(OH)3 Dry Air Purge
CAUSTIC SCRUBBER
HCI
During heating in a nitrogen atmosphere, the ~hlminum alkyls are
decomposed, TiCI3 is converted to TiCI2, and THF and other hydrocarbons are
removed. After heating (in the presence of nitrogen), the catalyst loses some or all
30 of its activity and upon exposure to air, no violent reaction takes place.
Samples of the catalyst were analyzed for metal content at the end of step 1
and step 2 of the deactivation process, the results are presented in Table 2.
As seen in Figures 1 and 2, two caustic solution gas bubblers were set up in
series to trap and measure any gaseous HCI evolved during catalyst decomposition.
35 pH measurements and chloride analysis indicate that very little HCI is given off
during the deactivation process. (Table 1 )
After complete deactivation, the catalyst lost 20% of its weight.
The liquid and gas collected by dry icelacetone condensation weighed 15.4
grams. The amount of material not accounted for is assumed to be light
40 hydrocarbons and HCI. Distribution of the gas not accounted for and liquid caught
in the trap is 23 and 77 weight percent respectively. The gaseous and liquid
products were analyzed by gas chromatography and mass spectrometer for
identification. Results are shown in Table 5.
- 2163210
PCT/USg4/05550
_~o 94/26792 - 1 5
TABLE 5
;
LIOUID ANALYSIS
; 5 Type Amount(weight %)
Saturated and olefinic
hydrocarbons 84.0- 89.0
10 TH~ 12.5- 7.2
Aromatics, chlorinated
hydrocarbons 3.5- 3.8
15 TOTAL 100.0-100.0
GASEOUS SAMPLES
Type Amount (weight %)
20 C2-C4 hydrocarbons 65.8 - 76.1
C2-C6 total 98.8 - 99.6
2~i Considering both the gaseous and liquid components as part of the 20
percent weight loss, the following split was calculated:
Component Amount (weight %)
Saturated and olefinic
hydrocarbons 87.7 - 91.5
THF 9.6 - 5.6
Aromatics, Chlorinated
hydrocarbons, other 2.7 - 2.9
TOTAL 100.0 - 100.0
WO 94/26792 2 ~ 6 3 ;~ I O PCT/US94/05550--
-- 16 -
Hypothetical commercial dry polyole~ln transition metal catalyst
deactivation.
An analysis of transition metal polyolefin catalyst hypothetically scaled up
from an example in European Patent application EP 369 436 A2 is shown in Table
S 6.
Catalyst components and weight:
TABLE 6
COMPONENT WEIGHT
Silica 700 Ibs (318.18 kg)
TEAL 33 Ibs (15 kg)
MgCI~ 75 Ibs (34.09 kg)
TiCI3 ~,3 AICI3 50 Ibs (27.72 kg)
THF 152 Ibs (69 kg)
CATALYST PRECURSOR 1010 Ibs (459 kg)
TNHAL 178 Ibs (80.9 kg)
DEAC 127 Ibs (57.72 kg)
Isopentane 20 Ibs (9.09 kg)
FINAL CATALYST 1335 Ibs (606.81 kg)
Utilizing a process as described by the present invention, treating the above
hypothetical catalyst, the free hydrocarbons and hydrocarbons/chemicals generated
from reactions taking place under the thermal conditions of our invention have
been sho~vn above.
The maximum amount of volatile chemicals expected to be generated
during nitrogen heat treatment of the catalyst are shown in Table 6.
!vo 94l26792 2 1 6 3 ~ 1 0 PCT/US94/05550
TABLE 7
;
CHEMICAL CALCULATED AMOUNT SOURCE
Ibs (kg)
H2 4 (1.8) TEAL, THNAL, DEAC
Ethylene 80 (36.3) TEAL, DEAC
Isopentane20 (9.1) free isopentane
Hexene 159 (72.2) TNHAL
THF 152 (69.1) free and complex THF
HCl 38 (17.2) DEAC
The non-volatiles, as discussed above, may be treated with air and
subsequently safely disposed of.
COMPARATIVE DATA
Similar catalyst constituents as discussed In Examples 1 and 2 were
deactivated by a conventional means in a commercial facility. Deactivation
involved flooding the catalyst with water and disposing of the water and the solids.
The data in the Table shows the range of analysis of results from multiple
commercial deactivations. Water, a~er use in the deactivation process, had a flash
point below 140 F (60 C) and a pH below 5.
WO 94/26792 2 1 6 3 2 ~ ~ PCT/US94/05550--
- 18 -
Analysis of water deactivated catalyst:
TABLE 8
CHEMICAL RANGE*
TiO2 0.6- 0.8
Al2O3 3.0- 4.0
Mg(OH)Cl 1.5- 2.0
0 SiO2 20.0 - 28.0
HCl(insolution)3.0- 4.0
Tetrahydrofuran1.0- 6.0
Hexane 1.0- 6.0
Water 70.0 - 60.0
1~
*(weight percent based on the total weight of water plus catalyst)
Plashpoint 90-110 F (32-43 C); pH 3.2
As can be seen from Table 8, the conventional catalyst deactivation by
water, leaves the water/catalyst mix with constituents that might be classified as
hæardous, requiring expensive disposal methods.
The prere~ l ed embodiments of the present invention have been described
above. It should be understood that the foregoing description is intended only to
illustrate certain preferred embodiments of the invention, and is not intended to
define the invention in any way. Other embodiments of the invention can be
employed without departing from the full scope of the invention as set forth in the
appended claims.
