Language selection

Search

Patent 2167956 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2167956
(54) English Title: METHOD OF DESCRIBING A BUILDING STRUCTURE
(54) French Title: METHODE DE DESCRIPTION DE LA STRUCTURE D'UN BATIMENT
Status: Deemed expired
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • G06F 30/00 (2020.01)
  • G06Q 10/00 (2012.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • MURDOCK, JEFFREY EARL (Canada)
  • MOFFATT, PETER JAMES (Canada)
(73) Owners :
  • MOFFATT, PETER JAMES (Canada)
  • MURDOCK, JEFFREY EARL (Canada)
(71) Applicants :
  • MURDOCK, JEFFREY EARL (Canada)
  • MOFFATT, PETER JAMES (Canada)
(74) Agent: NEXUS LAW GROUP LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2008-04-22
(22) Filed Date: 1996-01-24
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 1997-07-25
Examination requested: 2003-01-17
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data: None

Abstracts

English Abstract

A method of establishing the structure of a building which includes selecting a core template structure, determining dimensions and default dimensions for the core, and selecting an addition template structure based upon the structure being an addition to the core. Next diemsnions and default dimensiions and the position of attachment to the core are determined and finally the building volumen and component areas are calculated utilizing the previously established information.


French Abstract

La présente concerne une méthode de description de la structure d'un bâtiment qui comprend la sélection d'une structure de modèle de base, la détermination des dimensions et des dimensions par défaut du modèle de base, et la sélection d'une structure de modèle additionnelle basée sur la structure et qui constitue une addition au modèle de base. Ensuite, on détermine les dimensions et les dimensions par défaut du modèle de base et enfin on calcule le volume du bâtiment et les superficies des composants en utilisant les informations précédemment déterminées.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.



11

WE CLAIM:


1. A method of describing a building structure and
producing data indicative of areas of surfaces and volumes
of spaces of said building structure, comprising:


a) selecting a core structural information template
from a plurality of possible core structural
information templates wherein said core structural
information template includes a member of the group
selected from a predefined geometric form, a
predefined orientation for said geometric form,
labels assigned to one or more discrete surfaces,
vectors and vertices of said geometric form, or a
combination thereof, and wherein said core
structural information template facilitates the
input of data to generate a core structure
representative of the geometric form, dimensions
and orientation of all or part of said building
structure;


b) specifying an orientation of said core structure;

c) specifying dimensions of said core structure;


d) selecting one or more addition structural
information templates from a plurality of possible
addition structural information templates
representing addition structures wherein said
addition structures are additions to said core
structure or to other addition structures, wherein
said addition structural information templates


12

include a member of the group selected from a
predefined geometric form, a predefined orientation
for said geometric form, labels assigned to one or
more discrete surfaces, vectors and vertices of
said geometric form, predefined constraints on the
type of structures to which said addition
structures may be added, predefined constraints on
the locations of said addition structures, a
predefined method for specifying the location of
said addition structures, or a combination thereof,
and wherein said addition structural information
templates facilitate the input of data to generate
one of said addition structures representative of
the geometric form, dimensions, orientation and
relative location of some part of said building
structure;


e) specifying an orientation of each of said addition
structures;


f) specifying dimensions of each of said addition
structures;


g) specifying a location of each of said addition
structures relative to said core structure or
relative to others of said addition structures; and


h) calculating data indicative of areas of surfaces and
volumes of spaces of said building structure using
structural information generated by steps a) to g)
inclusive.


13

2. A method according to claim 1, including describing: a
location of ground with respect to a building structure;
construction details of said building structure; reference
window dimensions for each of the front, back, left and
right sides of said building structure and the number of
windows on each level of said building structure that
provide an equivalent total window area for that level of
said building structure; orientation of said windows;
construction details of said windows; the number of doors
of standard size on each of said levels of said building
structure, and the construction type of said doors.


3. A method according to claim 1, wherein the core
structure has rectangular geometry.


4. A method according to claim 2, including using said
data indicative of areas of surfaces and volumes of spaces,
said ground location, and window and door information in
applying an energy audit on said building structure that
includes an energy simulation to determine heat losses and
gains of and through various components of said building
structure.


5. The method of claim 1, wherein one of said core and
addition structural information templates describes a
plurality of discrete forms.


6. The method of claim 1, wherein one or more of said
core and addition structural information templates includes
preassignment of unique labels to discrete surfaces,


14

vectors, and vertices of a structural element or to
groupings of surfaces, vectors, and vertices of structural
elements.


7. The method of claim 1, wherein one or more of said
addition structural information templates facilitates the
location of an associated addition element as being on the
inside or inside and outside of an exterior surface of
another element.


8. The method of claim 1, wherein one or more of said
core and addition structural information templates
distinguish between defaulted and nondefaulted dimension
parameters, and said structural information templates
facilitate a reviewing and adjusting of said default
dimension parameters.


9. A process for conducting an energy audit on a building
structure:


a) determining the heated envelope of said building
structure;


b) selecting a core structural information template
from a plurality of possible core structural
information templates wherein said core structural
information template includes a member of the group
selected from a predefined geometric form, a
predefined orientation for said geometric form,
labels assigned to one or more discrete surfaces,
vectors and vertices of said geometric form, or a
combination thereof, and wherein said core



15

structural information template facilitates the
input of data to generate a core structure
representative of the geometric form, dimensions and
orientation of all or part of said building
structure;

c) specifying an orientation of said core structure;
d) specifying dimensions of said core structure;

e) specifying the location of ground with respect to
said core structure and specifying construction
details of said core structure;

f) selecting one or more addition structural
information templates from a plurality of possible
addition structural information templates if said
building structure has a composite structure,
wherein said addition structures are addition to
said core structure or to other addition structures,
wherein said addition structural information
templates include a member of the group selected
from a predefined geometric form a predefined
orientation for said geometric form, labels assigned
to one or more discrete surfaces, vectors and
vertices of said geometric Form, predefined
constraints on the type of structures to which said
addition structures may be added, predefined
constraints on the locations of said addition
structures, a predefined method for specifying the
location of said addition structures, or a
combination thereof, and wherein said addition



16

structural information templates facilitate the
input of data to generate one of said addition
structures representative of the geometric form,
dimensions, orientation and relative location of
some part of said building structure;

g) specifying an orientation of each of said addition
structures;

h) specifying dimensions of each of said addition
structures;

i) specifying a location of each of said addition
structures relative to said core structure or
relative to others of said addition structures;

j) specifying the location of the ground with respect
to said addition structures and specifying
construction details of each of said addition
structures;

k) calculating data indicative of areas of surfaces and
volumes of spaces of said building structure using
structural information generated by steps a) to j)
inclusive; and

l) applying structural information generated by steps
a) to j) inclusive and said data indicative of areas
of surfaces and volumes of spaces to an energy
simulation program to determine heat losses and
gains of and through various components of said
building structure.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


2 1
" 167956

METHOD OF DESCRIBING A BUILDING STRUCTURE
FIELD:
The present invention relates to a method of
describing a building structure which produces useful
information concerning the geometric form and dimensions
that enables further processes concerning the building to
be carried out.

BACKGROUND
Before being able to do such things as an energy
audit on a building, costing out construction, renovation
work or graphically representing a building using a
computer-based application, (e.g., a CAD program), it is
necessary to have information concerning the geometric form
of the structure, dimensions, areas of individual building
components(e.g., ceilings, walls, and floors), and volumes
of spaces contained within the building structure. The
conventional method of describing the form and dimensions
of a building included hand-drawn building sketches, or
entering structural information by hand into a computer-
based graphics application. Hand-drawing building sketches
is tedious, time consuming, and very often done in an
unsystematic and approximate manner. Manually entering
information into a computer based graphics application is
tedious, time consuming and an expert skill. Conventional,
methods of computing areas and volumes involve performing
hand calculations which is also tedious, time consuming,
and very often done in an unsystematic and approximate
manner. Some computer assisted design (CAD) type
applications perform this function, but only if structural
data has been appropriately provided to the application.

Conducting a detailed energy audit on a typical
residential building which involves hand-drawn building
sketches, taking the dimensions of the building, and
calculating areas and volumes can take up to 10 person
hours. It would be desirable to have a system which could
reduce this time and hence the cost considerably.


2 2167956

Accordingly, it is an object of the present
invention to provide an improved method of describing a
building structure.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
According to the invention there is provided a
a method of establishing the structure of a building,
comprising selecting a core template structure, determining
dimensions and reviewing and adjusting non-standard default
dimensions for the core, selecting an addition template
structure based upon the structure being an addition to the
core, determining dimensions, grade, and floor
construction, and reviewing and adjusting non-standard
default dimensions and the position of attachment to the
core, and calculating building volume and component areas
utilizing the information from the foregoing steps. The
method provides an efficient procedure for describing the
structure of building so as to provide a usable set of
structural information and establishes a basis for an
efficient procedure for collecting and processing building
information. The procedure requires a reduced set of
information and provides a systematic procedure for
collecting such data. The set of information is sufficient
to allow for the automated calculation of the area of each
discrete surface of the described structure, the volume of
each discrete space contained in the structure and the
graphic representation of the structure.

Advantageously, the method includes setting
grade, establishing reference window dimensions, the number
of such windows on each level and the construction details
of such windows, the number of doors of standard size, the
number and location of such doors and their construction
type and establishing the direction faced by the front wall
of the building.

The core may have rectangular geometry.
Alternatively, any shape of core could be selected


'~- 3
2167956

preferably consistent with the shape of the building. The
efficient procedures for collecting and processing building
information permits prelabelling of surfaces, vectors and
vertices allowing users to quickly and easily assign
attributes to individual and groupings of structural
components. Prelabelling of core and addition structural
template components allows users to assign attributes to
individual and groupings of components as they proceed with
the task of describing the structure of a building. The
suitability of the method's resulting information for
computer processing offers the potential benefits of
computer processing to efforts to collect and process other
building information that is linked to or otherwise
dependent on a description of building structure.

In another aspect of the invention the method may
use the calculated values in applying an energy audit.
Such method involves determining the structure of a
building's heated envelope, selecting a core template
structure, determining dimensions and reviewing and
adjusting non-standard default dimensions for the core and
describing construction details of the core. The method
further involves selecting an addition template structure
based upon the structure being an addition to the core,
determining dimensions and reviewing and adjusting non-
standard default dimensions and the position of attachment
to the core, setting grade and calculating building volume
and component areas utilizing the information from steps
(a) to (f) inclusive and applying the template information
to an energy simulation program to determine heat loss
through various components of the building. The present
invention integrates the task of describing a building
structure, of collecting construction details and the task
of describing the structure of the heated envelope.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The novel features believed characteristic of the
invention are set forth in the appended claims. The
invention itself, however, as well as other features and


4 2167956

advantages thereof, will be best understood by reference to
the detailed description which follows, read in conjunction
with the accompanying drawings, wherein:

FIG. 1 shows a sample house to which the method
is applied;

FIG. 2 shows the core that is established;

FIG. 3 shows the additions that are established
from the core;

FIG. 4 shows the house of FIG 1 set in the
ground;

FIG. 5 shows the pasting of windows and doors
onto the structure of FIG. 4;

FIG. 6 is a sketch showing a house to which a
detailed application of the method will be applied;

FIG. 7 is a sketch of the appropriate level of
detail required to describe the structure of the building's
heated envelope;

FIG. 8 is the core structural template for the
house of FIG. 6;

FIG. 9 is the addition structural template for
the house of FIG. 6;

FIG. 10 is a flow diagram of the general steps in
establishing the structure of a building;

FIGS. 11a and 11b are flow diagrams of a general
procedure for collecting information on the heated envelope
of a residential building for the purposes of performing a
comprehensive energy audit;


2 i 67956

FIG. 12 is a worksheet for describing the
construction details of a core structure;

FIG. 13 is a worksheet for describing the
construction details of an addition structure;

FIG. 14 is a worksheet for pasting windows and
describing their construction details;

FIG. 15 is a worksheet for pasting doors and
describing their construction details; and

FIG. 16 is a table comparing the heat audit
results using this method with those employing detailed
field audit calculations.

FIG. 17 is a flow diagram of the programs used to
determine the energy audit output results of Figure 15.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION WITH REFERENCE TO THE DRAWINGS
The first step in establishing the structure of a
building is to establish a core structure which is of a
geometry that is generally consistent with that of the
building. For example, for a box-shaped building with a
number of additions it would make sense to select a box-
shaped core. Conversely, if the building were circular in
shape, a circular core would ordinarily be preferable. For
the first-mentioned example, the size of the core would
ordinarily be chosen to be the largest box-shaped structure
that the building can accommodate. The core is defined by
structural templates that can include a predefined
geometric form, a predefined orientation for the geometric
form with respect to the earth's gravitational force, i.e.,
down, and unique labels assigned to each discrete surface,
vector and vertices of the geometric form. Unique labels
are assigned to various groupings of surfaces, vectors and
vertices. Such templates should also give a clear
indication of all the dimensions that need to be specified


6
2167956

to fully describe the geometric form. Finally default
values are provided for select dimensions. For example, in
North America since the standard wall height is 8 feet for
residential buildings, such a dimension would be
appropriate for the building wall height default value.
The core is developed by adding additions to the
core or to the additions themselves. Additions can be of
any size and can be located on the inside, outside or on
the inside and outside of the exterior surface of the
structure to which they are to be added. Additions are
defined, as is the core, by addition structural templates.
All of the items listed above for a core structural
template are also applicable for addition structural
templates. In addition, there are predefined constraints
on the types of structures to which the addition can be
added, on the location of the addition relative to the
structure to which it is being added, and a prescribed
procedure for specifying the location of the addition
relative to the structure to which it is being added.

To see in general terms how the present method is
applied to a house as seen in Figure 1, the first step is
to establish a core as shown in Figure 2.

The second major step as shown in Figure 3 is to
establish the additions from the core.

The third step as shown in Figure 4 is to set
the grade for any level of a core or addition that has
exterior surfaces in contact with the ground. The
percentage of each level's floor perimeter that is at or
above grade is estimated as is the percentage of the total
wall area that is below grade. The landscaping surrounding
the level is described and the average height of the
concrete wall that is exposed above grade is estimated.

The fourth step as shown in Figure 5 is to paste
windows by establishing a typical window size and recording

2167956
7

the width and height of this window and providing the
number of such windows on the front, back and two sides of
the composite structure.

Finally, the doors are pasted by specifying the
equivalent number of standard sized doors (e.g., 2'8" by
6'8") which gives the total door area, and the location of
each. Any glass area formerly included with window area is
deducted.

Referring to Figure 6, there is shown a house to
which a more detailed application of the present method
will be demonstrated. With energy simulation as the
process to which the method of the invention is applied,
considering that only the roof cavity is unheated, the
appropriate structure of the building's heated envelope is
shown in Figure 7 together with measured width depth and
height.

Referring to Figure 8, the core structural
template provides for the recordation of width and depth
dimensions as well as default dimensions. In this case the
height of the first level is 2.1 meters rather than the
standard 2.4 meters and so 2.1 is entered in the custom
dimensions block.

Referring to Figure 9, the structural template
for the addition requires recordation of the width depth
and number of stories for the addition. Provision is also
made for indicating to what structure the addition is added
and at what level. Any step-up or step-down from the
addition to the structure to which it is added is also
recorded.

Referring to Figures 10, the procedure is first
to select a core template structure at step 20 and to
assign values to non-defaulted dimensions at step 22. Next
the default dimensions are checked at step 23 to determine
whether or not they are all acceptable. If not, then the


8 2167956

unacceptable default dimensions are adjusted. Next at step
26, a determination is made as to whether or not the core
structure sufficiently describes the desired structure. If
it does then the algorithm is complete. If not, then an
additional structural template is selected at step 32 and
non-defaulted dimensions are assigned values at step 34.
Again at step 36 a determination is made as to whether or
not the defaulted dimensions are acceptable. If not, then
the unacceptable default dimensions are changed at step 38.
At step 40 the addition is located relative to the
structure to which it is being added and a determination at
step 42 as to whether or not there are any other additions
required. If no other additions are required then the
process is complete. If not then the system returns to
step 32 to repeat the method for another addition.

A flow diagram directed to the specific task of
performing an energy audit is shown in Figures 11a and
11b. In this case the energy audit is applied to the
house of Figure 6, the heated envelope of which is shown in
Figure 7. After determining the heated envelope at step
44, the core structural template is selected at step 46 and
non-defaulted dimensions assigned at step 48. Defaulted
dimensions are changed if necessary at steps 50 and 52 and
grade is set for the core structure at step 54. Next at
step 56 construction details of the core are established as
shown in the worksheet of Figure 12. Details such as wall
covering, framing board size, insulation, roof
construction, exterior finish, basement wall construction,
main joist band walls and floor construction are all
specified. At step 58, it is determined whether or not the
core structure sufficiently describes the heated envelope.
If so then the process is complete. If not, then an
additional structural template for the addition is selected
at step 60, values assigned to non-defaulted dimensions at
step 62, and a test made at step 64 as to whether or not
the defaulted dimensions are acceptable. Any changes in
the default dimensions is made at step 66 and at step 68,


9
2167956
the addition is located relative to the composite
structure.

At step 70 the grade level is set and the
construction details of the addition are described at step
72 as shown in the worksheet of Figure 13. Similar
measurements to the addition are made as were described
with the core above. If at step 74 the composite structure
sufficiently describes the heated envelope, then the
windows are pasted on at step 76 and the doors at step 78.
The worksheets for the latter process are shown in Figures
14 and 15. Here the typical window size is recorded and
the number of such windows in each zone, the frame material
of the windows, their glazing and their style. The
orientation of the front window is also recorded. In
Figure 15 the number of standard doors and their type is
recorded together with their construction.

With the foregoing information it is a simple
matter to use a computer based application such as Home
Energy Planning Tool Kit (HEP) available from Sheltair
Scientific Ltd.of Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada to
compute energy consumption of various parts of the
building. Figure 16 shows a comparison of the results
obtained using the method of the present invention over
that obtained from detailed field audit calculations. A
computer program which employs HEP together with a standard
energy simulation program is shown in Figure 17. In this
case data is fed into the House Generator 80 which is a
portion of the overall program which accepts input of
collected structural template information. This process is
repeated for all templates until the core, the additions,
and the windows and doors have all been entered. The House
Generator 80 then makes the calculations of the areas and
volumes required as input by the energy simulation program
82. The House Generator 80 produces the output results set
forth in Figure 16.


10
2167956

Obviously the House Generator program 80 can
easily be modified to generate the type of input
information required for other applications such as input
for a CAD program or a cost estimating program.

Accordingly, while this invention has been
described with reference to illustrative embodiments, this
description is not intended to be construed in a limiting
sense. Various modifications of the illustrative
embodiments, as well as other embodiments of the invention,
will be apparent to persons skilled in the art upon
reference to this description. It is therefore
contemplated that the appended claims will cover any such
modifications or embodiments as fall within the true scope
of the invention.

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date 2008-04-22
(22) Filed 1996-01-24
(41) Open to Public Inspection 1997-07-25
Examination Requested 2003-01-17
(45) Issued 2008-04-22
Deemed Expired 2014-01-24

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2007-01-24 FAILURE TO PAY APPLICATION MAINTENANCE FEE 2007-01-30

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Application Fee $0.00 1996-01-24
Registration of a document - section 124 $0.00 1996-04-18
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 2 1998-01-26 $50.00 1998-01-12
Section 8 Correction $200.00 1998-06-08
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 3 1999-01-25 $50.00 1999-01-21
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 4 2000-01-24 $50.00 2000-01-18
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 5 2001-01-24 $75.00 2001-01-18
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 6 2002-01-24 $75.00 2002-01-09
Request for Examination $200.00 2003-01-17
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 7 2003-01-24 $75.00 2003-01-17
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 8 2004-01-26 $75.00 2003-12-15
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 9 2005-01-24 $100.00 2005-01-10
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 10 2006-01-24 $125.00 2006-01-23
Reinstatement: Failure to Pay Application Maintenance Fees $200.00 2007-01-30
Expired 2019 - Corrective payment/Section 78.6 $1,025.00 2007-01-30
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 11 2007-01-24 $250.00 2007-01-30
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 12 2008-01-24 $250.00 2008-01-10
Final Fee $300.00 2008-01-24
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 13 2009-01-26 $250.00 2009-01-23
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 14 2010-01-25 $250.00 2010-01-18
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 15 2011-01-24 $450.00 2010-12-21
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 16 2012-01-24 $450.00 2012-01-24
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
MOFFATT, PETER JAMES
MURDOCK, JEFFREY EARL
Past Owners on Record
MOFFATT, PETER JAMES
MURDOCK, JEFFREY EARL
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Cover Page 2008-03-26 1 36
Representative Drawing 1998-03-05 1 8
Abstract 1996-02-19 1 19
Cover Page 1998-08-19 1 14
Cover Page 1996-01-24 1 14
Abstract 1996-01-24 1 15
Description 1996-01-24 10 420
Claims 1996-01-24 2 48
Drawings 1996-01-24 18 352
Claims 2007-01-30 6 195
Representative Drawing 2007-07-06 1 9
Fees 2007-01-30 1 38
Fees 2003-01-17 1 35
Assignment 1996-01-24 19 689
Prosecution-Amendment 2003-01-17 1 68
Correspondence 1996-02-19 2 53
Prosecution-Amendment 2003-05-21 2 61
Fees 2006-01-23 1 30
Fees 2003-12-15 1 34
Fees 1999-01-21 1 36
Fees 2002-01-09 1 34
Fees 2001-01-18 1 34
Fees 1998-01-12 1 39
Fees 2000-01-18 1 33
Fees 2005-01-10 1 31
Prosecution-Amendment 2006-09-13 3 135
Prosecution-Amendment 2007-01-30 1 36
Prosecution-Amendment 2007-01-30 8 231
Correspondence 2007-03-12 1 30
Fees 2008-01-10 1 31
Correspondence 2008-01-24 1 32
Fees 2009-01-23 1 33
Fees 2010-01-18 1 32
Fees 2010-12-21 1 202
Fees 2012-01-24 1 163