Language selection

Search

Patent 2193290 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2193290
(54) English Title: PACKER WITH BACK-UP RETRIEVING METHOD
(54) French Title: GARNITURE D'ETANCHEITE ET METHODE DE RECUPERATION AUXILIAIRE DE CETTE GARNITURE
Status: Dead
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • E21B 33/12 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • LEMBCKE, JEFFREY J. (United States of America)
  • HENDERSON, WILLIAM D. (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • BAKER HUGHES INCORPORATED (United States of America)
(71) Applicants :
  • BAKER HUGHES INCORPORATED (United States of America)
(74) Agent: SIM & MCBURNEY
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(22) Filed Date: 1996-12-18
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 1997-06-19
Examination requested: 2001-10-17
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
08/585,214 United States of America 1995-12-18

Abstracts

English Abstract




A packer or bridge plug is described which may be release by manipulation
of the production tubing connected to it. If manipulation of the production tubing
is unsuccessful in releasing the packer, the tensile strength of the production tubing
need not be exceeded in attempting to remove the packer. Instead, the productiontubing is removed along with certain internal components of the packer. Thereaf-ter, heavy-wall tubing, with or without jars, can be lowered into the wellbore with
a retrieving tool at the bottom of that string. The retrieving tool latches onto com-
ponents of the packer to allow an alternative method of release which allows foruse of significantly higher tensile loads to liberate the packer from the wellbore.


French Abstract

a présente invention concerne un packer, ou garniture d'étanchéité, qui peut être délogé en manipulant le tube de production auquel il est connecté. Si cette manoeuvre ne réussit, il n'est pas nécessaire de solliciter le tube au-delà de sa résistance à la traction pour dégager le packer. Au lieu de cela, il faut retirer le tube du puits ainsi que certains éléments internes du packer. Par la suite, on peut descendre dans le puits un tubage à paroi épaisse doté ou non de coulisses et portant à son extrémité inférieure un outil de récupération. Celui-ci s'accroche aux éléments restants du packer pour offrir un autre moyen d'extraction qui permet de mettre en oeuvre des forces beaucoup plus élevées.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.



CLAIMS
1. A method of setting and releasing a packer downhole, comprising:
running in a packer to a desired depth;
setting at least one slip;
setting at least one sealing element;
locking the set of said sealing element with a locking assembly;
attaching production tubing to the packer;
moving a mandrel in the packer with said production tubing;
providing a first mode of release as a result of shifting said mandrel
which unlocks said locking assembly;
removing said production tubing;
providing access to said locking assembly by said removal of said
production tubing; and
defeating said locking assembly by alternate means as a second mode
of release for the packer.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein providing said second mode of
release further comprises:
removing said production tubing with sufficient portions of said
mandrel to provide access to said locking assembly;
reengaging said locking assembly with a release tool supported by
more rigid tubing than said production tubing; and
defeating said locking assembly for removal of the packer.






3. The method of claim 2, further comprising:
providing at least one locking collet on said mandrel as a part of said
locking assembly securing said mandrel to the packer body to hold the set of said
slip and sealing element; and
providing a lock ring to selectively secure said collet to the packer
body.

4. The method of claim 3, further comprising:
disconnecting at least a portion of said mandrel from said packer body
while said disconnected portion of said mandrel is supported by said production
tubing;
engaging said lock ring with said disconnected portion of said man-
drel; and
attempting to move said lock ring and the remaining portions of said
mandrel to secure the release of the packer with said production tubing.

5. The method of claim 4, further comprising:
providing a detachable abutment on said disconnected portion of
mandrel to engage said lock ring;
selectively releasing said abutment if a predetermined force on said
production tubing has failed to release the packer; and
removing said mandrel which clears past said lock ring as a result of
releasing said abutment.

6. The method of claim 5, further comprising:
releasing said abutment by rotation of said mandrel.



11


7. The method of claim 5, further comprising:
releasing said abutment by shearing off a portion of said mandrel
supporting said abutment.

8. The method of claim 5, further comprising:
engaging said lock ring with said release tool after failing to secure
removal of the packer with said abutment on said mandrel.

9. A releasable packer for use in a wellbore, comprising:
a body;
at least one slip on said body;
at least one sealing element on said body;
a mandrel selectively movable with respect to said body;
a locking assembly to secure at least a first portion of said mandrel
to said body for securing the setting of the slip and sealing element;
the remaining second portion of said mandrel movable to selectively
engage said locking assembly for defeat thereof as a first mode of release of the
packer; and
said second portion of said mandrel removable from said body to
allow insertion of a release tool to engage said locking assembly as a second mode
of release in the event a force of a predetermined value on said second portion of
said mandrel fails to release the packer.



12


10. The packer of claim 9, wherein:
said locking assembly further comprises at least one collet on said
first portion of said mandrel and a lock ring to secure a locked position of said
collet; and
said first and second portions of said mandrel movable unitarily to
secure said collet in a position where said slip and sealing element are secured in
the wellbore.

11. The packer of claim 9, wherein:
said first portion of said mandrel remains fixed by said collet and said
second portion movable after detachment for selective engagement with said lock
ring;
whereupon application of a sufficient force to said lock ring through
said second portion of said mandrel, said collet becomes unsupported and first
mode of release can be achieved.

12. The packer of claim 11, wherein:
said second portion of said mandrel comprises an abutment selectively
engageable with said lock ring, said abutment selectively detachable from said
mandrel.

13. The packer of claim 12, wherein:
said abutment is detachable by rotating said second portion of said
mandrel.



13


14. The packer of claim 12, wherein:
said abutment is detachable by shearing off said abutment from said
second portion of said mandrel.

15. The packer of claim 12, wherein:
said mandrel, without said abutment, can clear past said lock ring for
removal thereof from said body;
whereupon said lock ring is accessible by insertion of a removal tool
as a second mode of releasing the packer.

16. The packer of claim 11, wherein:
said second portion of said mandrel is supported by a production
tubing string;
whereupon if application of a predetermined force on said production
string fails to secure release of the packer, said production string with said second
portion of said mandrel less said abutment is removable from the wellbore.

17. The packer of claim 16, wherein:
said release tool is supported by a tubing string of a heavier wall than
said production tubing to allow application of a greater extractive force through
said lock ring than was possible with said production tubing.




14

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


- 21 93290

TITLE: PACKER WITH BACK-UP RETRIEVING METHOD
INVENTORS: WILLIAM D. HENDERSON and JEFFREY J. LEMBCKE

FIFT r~ OF THE INVFl~ION
The field of this invention relates to retrievable parlrPre, and more particu-
larly to packers that may be retrieved in more than one way.

10 BACKGROUND OF T~F T~VF~ITION
Packers are frequently used in oil and gas production to isolate one portion
of a wellbore from another. After being set in a wellbore for what could be as
long as many years, these p~rlr~rs need to be retrieved. Several ~ei~e have beenincorporated in the past for retrievable packers. One such packer, known as a seal-
15 bore-type packer, was run in on wireline. After setting the packer on wireline,
tubing was run and cf~nnecte~l to the packer by means of an anchor. In order to
retrieve this type of packer, the pro~lucfiQn tubing had to be ii.eco~n~cte~l from the
packer and removed from the wellbore. A sep~ale trip into the wellbore was then
required with a speci~lly designed retrieving tool that released the mech~nieme
20 within the packer to allow it to be unset and retrieved. Since the additional run of
tubing was made with hca~vyweight drillpipe with or without jars, which allowed
for tensile loads higher than the st~nd~rd production tubing, these types of packers
were often used and easily retrieved. Often these packers, after reln~ining in the
wellbore for many years, required the additional tensile loads that could be applied
25 through the heavy-wall tubing in combination with jars. These high-tensile loads
were l~ecess~.~ due to parts corroding together or debris settling out around the
packer. While this type of design allowed for retrieval, it was only at the expense
of running the heavy-wall tubing into the hole on a separate run. Typical of such

2 1 932qO

packers are par~P-rs made by Baker Oil Tools under Product No. 646, also called
RETRIEVA-D; RETRIEVA-DB; and RETRIEVA-DAB LOCK-SET retrievable
packers.
Another type of packer previously used is referred to as a modified tubing-
set packer. This particular type of packer could be set on a wireline. Part of the
Pe,eembly of the packer included a seal nipple and an on/off tool. These compo-
nents were connP~ted to the packer mandrel above the packer and were left in thewell when the packer was set. The production tubing was then run in and eng~ged
with the on/off tool seal nipple. The packer was retrieved by manip~ ting the
tubing in combination with rotation and tension to release the packer. The packer
was then retrieved on the production tubing. While this technique was desirable
beca~ee it did not le~lui~c an additional tubing run, as indicated with the previously
descAbed seal-bore-type pac~Pre~ such pac~Pre have been found to be less reliable
when it comes to retAeval than the seal-bore pae~P-rs, pAmaAly due to the tensile
limits of the pro~uction tubing string, the on/off tool, and the packer mandrel.Typical of such ~es~Pmblies of the modified tubing-set packer are a wireline-setUni-Packer VI made by Guiber.eon ~VA, a division of Dresser Tn-lnstries. Nippleswhich convert perm~nPnt or retAevable pacl~Prs into t,lnpol~r bridge plugs and
which are carried in with the packer when it is set are known in the art and onesuch product is made by Baker Oil Tools, Model RS, Product No. 66548 Seffln~
Nipple.
Ac~ordiJlgly, an objective of the preselll invention is to provide a packer or
bridge plug which can be tubing-rele~ce~l but if such mode of release for any
reason does not function to release the packer or bridge plug, a back-up method
of release with a rele~eing tool is also available for the same packer. The alterna-
tive method of release functions akin to the operation of the seal-bore-type pac~e-rs

2 1 93290

and requires the ad~liti~m~l run into the wellbore with heavy-wall tubing to be
used. Accoldil~gly, the objective of the invention is to give a greater confi~len~
level to operators beyond that previously e~ri~on~ed with using only a modified
tubing-set packer. Now, with the plesent invention, if the modified tubing-set
packer with the production tubing string fails to release, an ~ltçnl~tive release
me~h~ m is available.

SUMMA~Y OF THF INVF~TION
A packer or bridge plug is described which may be released by manipulation
of the produr,tion tubing conr~ted to it. If manipulation of the production tubing
is rncllcc~s~irul in rele~cing the packer, the tensile strength of the production tubing
need not be excee~led in attempting to remove the packer. Tn~tead the productiontubing is removed along with certain intern~l compollents of the packer. Thereaf-
ter, heavy-wall tubing, with or without jars, can be lowered into the wellbore with
a retrieving tool at the bottom of that string. The lehiGvillg tool latches onto com-
poll~n~ of the packer to allow an ~ltçr l~tive method of release which allows for
use of significantly higher tensile loads to liberate the packer from the wellbore.

nFT~n~Fn nF~CRlPIlON OF TE~F n~WI~GS
Figures la-d illustrate the packer of the preselll invention in the run-in
position.
Figures 2a-d illu~hate the packer in the set position.
Figures 3a-d illu~h~te the packer in the set position with the washover shoe
of the on/off tool latched into a J-slot.
Figures 4a-d illustrate the fully retrieved position using the washover shoe
of the on/off tool latched into the l-slot.

21 93290

Figures 5a-d illustrate the tool in the set position after rotation off of the
lower end of the mandrel.
Figures 6a-d are similar to the view of Sa-d except showing the mandrel
sheared.
Figures 7a-d show the ~lt~Prn~tive retrieval using a retrieving tool.

nFT~l~ Fn nF~CRTPllON OF T~F pRFFFRRFn Fl~RODIl~IF~T
Referring to Figures la-d, the app&,alus of the lJles~nt invention is illus-
trated. Since many of the fealules of the packer are st~n~l~rd collll~onents, they will
10 be described only very briefly. Packers or bridge plugs generally have a series of
slips 10 and se~ling elements 12. The slips 10 anchor the packer, while the sc~ling
elements 12 seal off around the periphery. The slips 10 are cammed outwardly
along ta~red s~ ec 14, while the s~P~ling elements 12 e~p~n~l radially oulw~dly
by beco.lling comp.essed between rings 16 and 18. Ring 18 is connectP~ to a set-
15 ting sleeve 20. A setting tool S of the type well-known in the art has components
that move in opposile directions to create the nec~P-ss~ relat*e movement to urge
the slips 10 along the tapered snrf~c~e 14, followed by the setting of the sealing
elemP-nte 12 as rings 16 and 18 approach each other.- A lock ring 22 holds the set
of the e~ling elements 12 after co.llples~ion has oc~ulled, as seen by co.~-p~ g20 Figure lc to Figure 2c. The setting tool S has a du~lw~dly moving sleeve 24,
which bears on setting sleeve 20 but is otherwise not physically connect~P~ thereto.
Another pOniOn of the setting tool S includes a sleeve 26 which is secured to a
mandrel 28 by a shear pin 30. Sup~lled by mandrel 28 is a known b1~nlcing plug
32 which is run in with the entire ~sembly so as to seal off an internal bore 34 in
25 the packer, using seal 36.

2 1 ~3290


Not shown in the drawings is the wireline ~uppoll for the setting tool S
which allows the proper positioning of the packer in the wellbore. The setting tool
S is ~stn~t~P~ in known ways to create dirr~.enlial movement between sleeves 24
and 26 such that sleeve 24 moves dow-l~dly, while sleeve 26 moves u~v~dly
5 to ac~omplish the setting~ as indicated by the arrows in Figure 2a. This dilr~ nlial
movement cams the slips 10 oulw~-dly~ as shown in Figure 2c. C~ntinl~P~ differ-
ential movement brings rings 16 and 18 closer together, while the lock ring 22,
using r~trheting teeth 23, retains the position of all the components, as shown in
Figure 2c. Shear pin 30 is sheared after full setting force is applied. This allows
10 the setting tool S to be removed. At this point, the setting tool S can be removed
and the pro-luction tubing run in the hole, coupled with a washover shoe 38 (seeFigure 3a). The washover shoe 38 has a J-slot arrangement 40 which latches onto
lug 42, which is part of the mandrel ~c.cernbly 28. It can also be secured by other
means. Seals 44 effectively seal between the washover shoe 38 and the mandrel
15 28. Once that task is ac~omplished, the bl~nking plug 32 is removed by wireline.
It should be noted that the production tubing 46 :iUppOlk~ the washover shoe
38 until the J-slot 40 c~tchP~ the lug 42. At that time, the production tubing string
46 is sP~lin~ly engaged to the mandrel 28 and, upon removal of the bl~nking plug32, production through the packer P can commPnce in a known ...~ -r.
When it comes time to release the packer, Figures 4a-d illu~llale one tech-
nique. In this technique, a rotational forc~ is applied to the production tubing 46.
This rotation undoes thread 48, which is shown in Figure 4b already s~ aled.
With thread 48 un~1onP., an u~v~d force is applied on the producti~ tubing 46,
brin~ing up mandrel 28. Packer mandrel 29 is ret~inP~l in a fi~ed position due to
m~ting teeth 72 and 74. At its lower end 52, mandrel segment or sleeve 28 has a

2 1 93290

lug 54 which is secured to sleeve 50 by shear pin 56. Below lug 54 is ring 58,
which is c~m~-cte~l to sleeve 28 at thread 60.
As shown in Figure 3d, the set position of the slips 10 and se~ling elements
12 is also lel~ ~l by collet fingers 70, which have teeth 72 which engage teeth 74
S on bottom sub 76. The position of the fingers 70 is secured by a ring 78 which is
secured to the fingers 70 by a shear pin 80. Those skilled in the art will a~ple~;iate
that a multiplicity of fingers 70, each with teeth 72, are employed, all of which
engage the teeth 74 on the bottom sub 76.
Referring now to Figure 4d, it can be seen that after the thread 48 is undone
and an u~w~J pull is applied to the tubing string 46, lug 54 bears on ring 78 toultimately break shear pin 80. When shear pin 80 breaks, the ring 78 can move
u~w~dly, thus allowing the fingers 70 to flex radially inwardly so as to allow the
teeth 72 to sep~ate from the teeth 74. When this occurs, the ~esemhly that holdsthe slips 10 and the se~ling ele.m~-nt 12 in a co.,-~leseed state can be e~tPn~le~l by
15 c~ g the u~,w~d pull on the production string 46.
Ultimately, as shown in Figure 4c, the slips 10 ride down the tapered s~R~e
14 and are retracted. A co~ u~w~ pull on the production string 46 will
move ring 18 away from ring 16 to allow the sealing elements 12 to relax to the
poeitinln shown in Figure lc. As shown in Figure 4c, the fingers 70 have had their
20 teeth 72 move completely away from the interengAging teeth 74 as a result of the
breaking of shear pin 80. Lug 54 then ~uppolls ring 78 when there is further
u~w~d pulling on the production string 46. Ring 78 is shaped so that it cannot fall
off of fingers 70, even after shear pin 80 is broken bec~se it c~tclle~e shoulder 81.
With lug 54 in contact with ring 78, the entire weight of the packer shifts to the
25 production string 46 and it can then be removed, ~ .n~ g that no complications
develop.

2 i 93290

However, esreci~lly for paCL-~re that have been in the wellbore for many
years, the motions previously described may not be sufficient to release the packer
from the wellbore. Thus, despite the undoing of thread 48 and the exertion of anu~d force within the limits of the tensile loads which can be applied through
S the production tubing 46, the assembly for a multiplicity of reasons just fails to
give way to allow the slips 10 or the se~ling elements 12 to relax.
If this should occur, the appalalus of the plesent invention has a backup
method of removal of the packer, which is illustrated in Figures Sa-d through 7a-
d.
Figure Sb shows thread 48 ntlon~ after rotation of the washover shoe 38,
as previously described. Now, since the packer will not release, further rotation
occurs from the position shown in Figure 4d. The lug 54 can be released with
respect to the sleeve 28 by breaking the shear pin 56 if it has not already beenbroken. The tubing string 46 is then rotated to undo thread 60. This leaves ring58, as well as lug 54, resting on shoulder 82, as shown in Figure Sd. With thread
60 now sep~aled as shown in Figure Sd, the pro~ ction tubing 46 can be pulled
out of the hole, taking with it the ~e~mbly co~n~ g the washover shoe 38 as
well as the sleeve 28.
This having been accomplished, heavy-wall tubing 83, with or without jars,
can be made up at the surface and run into the hole on top of a known release tool
R, as illu~ ted in Figures 7b-c. At this point in time, the ring 78 is eng~ged by
the release tool R, as shown in Figure 7c. Now, with the heavy-wall tubing 83 inplace and jars, if desired, in place, further efforts applying an even greater force
can be made to release the packer and retrieve it from the wellbore.
Figures 6a-d illu~ te yet another way of removing sleeve 28 from the
wellbore so as to expose the ring 78 for ultimate engagement with the release tool

2~ 93290

R In Figure 6c-d, the sleeve 28 actually shears in two pieces, leaving behind a
piece 28' resting on shoulder 82. The sleeve 28 is ~1P-S;~P~ to have a weak
section 84 which, prior to deliberate failure, is cor~necte~ to weak section 84' such
that upon an u~,w~rd force on the production tubing 46, a break occurs between
S ~g~ L~i 84 and 84', as shown in Figure 6d. In this ~ltern~tive de-~i~, shear pin
56 breaks first and the connection between weak sections 84 and 84' fails after the
shear pin breaks, with the result that the segment 28' merely falls dowll~dly
until it is caught by shoulder 82. Even in this embodiment, ring 52 can still berotated off before she~rin~ 84 from 84'.
Regardless of which technique is used as between the twist-off technique
shown in Figure Sd or the shear technique in Figure 6d, the final step is to run in
the hole with the retrieving tool R, which has a series of collets 86 supported by
a body 88. The collets 86 are spring-loaded using a spring or springs 90. The
collets 86 are deflected ~gain~t the spring 90 and flex toward the body 88 to get
lS past the ring 78. After pPC~ing the ring 78, the assembly is picked up and the
collets 86 are trapped ~gainct body 88 as shown in Figure 7c. Upward pulling on
the heavy-wall tubing or use of the jar combined with u~d pulling ultimately
results in the retrieval of the packer.
Those skilled in the art can readily see that a packer design has been pro-
20 vided which allows for release with the production tubing without an extra trip into
the wellbore. Hu..~ ~, if the release t~ht~ ue using the production tubing 46
proves ineffective to liberate the packer from the wellbore, a bafflp release
technique is provided. The production tubing 46 must be removed from the
wellbore. Ho~ , such removal effectively takes with it sufficient components
25 so as to expose the lug or ring 78 so that on a second trip with heavy-wall tubing
and/or jar eq~ ment~ the lug 78 can be .~c~s.ce~ for even greater applied forces

2 1 93290


than could be applied using the production tubing 46. While a second trip into the
wellbore is required if the production tubing 46 does not dislodge the.packer,
o~r~to.~ can have greater confidenr~ in the removability of their parl~P-r~ by
knowing that a backup terhnique for removal of the packer exists. Thus, e~peneive
S and time-co ~Q- ming mi11in~ operations can be avoided since the backup technique
allows the application of subst~nti~lly greater extraction forces than could be
applied using the production tubing 46.
The foregoing disclosure and description of the invention are illustrative and
explanatory thereof, and various c~l~nges in the size, shape and materials, as well
10 as in the details of the ill~ ted con~lluction, may be made without d~alling
from the spirit of the invention.

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date Unavailable
(22) Filed 1996-12-18
(41) Open to Public Inspection 1997-06-19
Examination Requested 2001-10-17
Dead Application 2005-12-19

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2004-12-20 FAILURE TO PAY APPLICATION MAINTENANCE FEE
2005-01-20 FAILURE TO PAY FINAL FEE

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 1996-12-18
Application Fee $0.00 1996-12-18
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 2 1998-12-18 $100.00 1998-12-08
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 3 1999-12-20 $100.00 1999-12-10
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 4 2000-12-18 $100.00 2000-12-05
Request for Examination $400.00 2001-10-17
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 5 2001-12-18 $150.00 2001-12-05
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 6 2002-12-18 $150.00 2002-12-05
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 7 2003-12-18 $150.00 2003-12-08
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
BAKER HUGHES INCORPORATED
Past Owners on Record
HENDERSON, WILLIAM D.
LEMBCKE, JEFFREY J.
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Representative Drawing 1998-05-25 1 22
Description 1997-04-22 9 398
Claims 1997-04-22 5 142
Drawings 1997-04-22 7 169
Cover Page 1997-04-22 1 16
Abstract 1997-04-22 1 21
Drawings 2001-11-28 7 274
Description 2004-04-08 10 441
Claims 2004-04-08 5 141
Representative Drawing 2004-07-12 1 8
Assignment 1997-12-02 7 270
Assignment 1996-12-18 21 870
Prosecution-Amendment 2001-10-17 1 57
Correspondence 1997-02-04 9 288
Prosecution-Amendment 2002-04-17 1 24
Prosecution-Amendment 2003-10-09 2 40
Prosecution-Amendment 2004-04-08 5 169
Prosecution Correspondence 1997-05-16 1 27