Language selection

Search

Patent 2205947 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2205947
(54) English Title: METHOD FOR REUSE OF CONTAMINATED CONCRETE
(54) French Title: METHODE POUR REUTILISER DU BETON CONTAMINE
Status: Deemed Abandoned and Beyond the Period of Reinstatement - Pending Response to Notice of Disregarded Communication
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • E04G 23/08 (2006.01)
  • B09B 1/00 (2006.01)
  • F42D 3/00 (2006.01)
  • G21F 1/00 (2006.01)
  • G21F 9/00 (2006.01)
  • G21F 9/34 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • KINGSLEY, RICHARD SEYMOUR (United States of America)
  • MARKS, TIMOTHY CARTER (United States of America)
  • MEYERS, JOHN BERNARD (United States of America)
  • PIETSCH, CHARLES PAUL (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • THE BABCOCK & WILCOX COMPANY
  • THE BABCOCK & WILCOX COMPANY
(71) Applicants :
  • THE BABCOCK & WILCOX COMPANY (United States of America)
  • THE BABCOCK & WILCOX COMPANY (United States of America)
(74) Agent: SMART & BIGGAR LP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(22) Filed Date: 1997-05-23
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 1997-11-30
Examination requested: 1997-05-23
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
08/657,862 (United States of America) 1996-05-31

Abstracts

English Abstract


A method for minimizing waste volumes from the demolition
of radiologically and/or chemically contaminated concrete
facilities by using engineering techniques to separate
contaminated from uncontaminated fractions and/or by reusing the
contaminated concrete for manufacture of waste storage or
disposal containers. Explosive demolition is used to either
selectively remove contaminated surface layers of concrete from
underlying uncontaminated concrete (where the contamination is
confined to the surface layers), or, where the contamination is
throughout the concrete, to reduce contaminated concrete into
pieces of an appropriate size for use as manufacturing aggregate.
The balance of the concrete structure can alternatively be
demolished using standard techniques if underlying concrete is
clean, and the resulting rubble free released for recycle or
disposal. When required, the concrete pieces are processed
through a concrete crusher until the appropriate aggregate size
is achieved. The recycled and previously regulated aggregate is
then used in manufacturing of storage or disposal containers,
cells, etc. for nuclear and/or hazardous waste and material, thus
reducing waste volumes and costs resulting from the
decommissioning of nuclear (or similar chemical processing)
facilities.


French Abstract

Méthode pour réduire au minimum les volumes de déchets provenant de la démolition d'installations radiologiques et (ou) chimiques en béton contaminé, grâce à des techniques permettant de séparer les fractions contaminées des fractions non contaminées et (ou) de réutiliser le béton contaminé pour la fabrication de contenants de stockage ou d'élimination des déchets. La démolition à l'explosif sert soit à éliminer sélectivement les couches de béton superficielles contaminées du béton sous-jacent non contaminé (là où la contamination est confinée aux couches de surface), ou, lorsque la contamination traverse toute l'épaisseur de béton, à réduire le béton contaminé en morceaux de taille appropriée pour servir comme agrégats industriels. Le reste de la structure de béton peut aussi être démoli à l'aide de techniques normalisées, si le béton sous-jacent n'est pas contaminé; les gravats résultants peuvent alors être recyclés ou éliminés. On peut, selon les besoins, faire passer les morceaux de béton dans un concasseur pour béton jusqu'à obtention de la taille d'agrégat appropriée. L'agrégat recyclé et de taille voulue est ensuite utilisé pour la production de contenants de stockage ou d'élimination, de compartiments, etc. pour matériaux et déchets nucléaires et (ou) dangereux, ce qui réduit le volume de déchets et les coûts résultant du démantèlement des installations nucléaires (ou d'unités chimiques de même type).

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


- 7 -
What is claimed as invention is:
1. A method for minimizing waste volumes from the demolition of
radiologically and/or chemically contaminated concrete
facilities, comprising:
a. demolishing the facility to reduce the size of
individual pieces of the contaminated concrete to a size
appropriate for reuse as manufacturing aggregate;
b. statistically sampling and analyzing the aggregate to
insure suitability for use as manufacturing aggregate; and
c. utilizing the aggregate in the manufacture of storage
or disposal containers for nuclear and/or hazardous
chemical waste and material.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein engineered explosions are used
in the selective removal of the contaminated concrete.
3. The method of claim 1, further comprising using a crusher to
insure that the contaminated concrete is reduced to an
appropriate aggregate size.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein the aggregate is utilized in
the manufacture of concrete structures other than storage
disposal containers.
5. A method for minimizing waste volumes from the demolition of
radiologically and/or chemically contaminated concrete
facilities, comprising:
a. demolishing the facility to reduce the size of
individual pieces of the contaminated concrete for reuse as
manufacturing aggregate;
b. processing the reduced concrete as required to insure

- 8 -
reduction to an appropriate size for use as aggregate;
c. statistically sampling and analyzing the aggregate to
insure suitability for use as manufacturing aggregate; and
d. utilizing the aggregate in the manufacture of
storage/disposal containers for nuclear and/or hazardous
chemical waste and material.
6. The method of claim 5, wherein the aggregate is utilized in
the manufacture of concrete structures other than storage or
disposal containers.
7. The method of claim 5, wherein engineered explosions are used
in the selective removal of the contaminated concrete.
8. The method of claim 5, wherein controlled demolition methods
are used in the selective removal of the contaminated concrete.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 0220~947 1997-0~-23
CASE 5804
METHOD FOR REUSE OF CONT~MTN~TED CONCRETE
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The invention is generally related to a method for the
demolition of radiologically or hazardous chemically contaminated
buildings constructed from concrete or other cementatious
materials, the waste management (minimization) of the
contaminated materials produced, and the beneficial unregulated
recycle and reuse of those volumes of contaminated materials
actually produced by using the previously regulated concrete
rubble as aggregate or cement in the construction of waste
disposal containers.
2. General Background
In the nuclear industry, nuclear waste and nuclear materials
are being shipped, stored, and/or disposed in concrete containers
and cells. These containers and cells are made with concrete
produced with clean aggregate. In another aspect of the nuclear
industry, radiologically contaminated buildings and containment
structures are being demolished, resulting in large volumes of
contaminated materials that must be safely disposed. These
materials include radiologically and/or hazardous chemically
contaminated concrete. These waste materials are disposed at
federal or state regulated sites. Recent state regulatory
initiatives at one such current disposal site (in South Carolina)
require that such radiologically contaminated building rubble and
similar wastes be buried in concrete burial boxes or vaults.
These aspects of the nuclear industry reveal three areas of

CA 0220~947 1997-0~-23
-2- CASE 5804
need that have not been adequately addressed. One is the
unnecessary generation of regulated waste by the use of
conventional demolition techniques. Most nuclear materials
processing facilities and nuclear power reactors are thick-walled
structures constructed of thousands of cubic yards of high-
density, reinforced concrete for structural strength and
radiation shielding. Depending on the type of facility and
process involved, the radiation and/or chemical contamination is
frequently restricted to the first few inches of the concrete
surface. In such cases, the use of conventional demolition
techniques results in the cross-contamination of the previously
clean concrete below the surface layers, thus vastly increasing
the volume of regulated wastes needing disposal in licensed
facilities.
A second area of need relates to the high cost and
logistical difficulty of disposing of radiologically and/or
chemically contaminated concrete. Over the next twenty years,
nearly all of the existing nuclear power stations in the United
States are scheduled to be decommissioned and (eventually)
demolished. A similar situation exists within the Department of
Energy's nuclear wéapons complex, where production facilities
have been almost all permanently closed. Adequate disposal
capacity for the large volumes of concrete rubble and other
wastes which will likely be generated from decommissioning these
facilities does not currently exist. Nor is it likely to be
developed in the foreseeable future because of difficulties in
siting and licensing new disposal facilities. Even if adequate

CA 0220~947 1997-0~-23
CASE 5804
capacity does become available, the rapidly escalating costs of
burial (which have doubled for some types of waste over the past
year) may make disposal costs prohibitive.
The third area of need relates to the high costs (and
unnecessary waste) of building new concrete storage and disposal
containers using clean, uncontaminated aggregate, when the
demolition rubble itself represents a source of potentially
useful aggregate.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The invention addresses the above needs. What is provided
is a demolition methodology for radiologically and/or chemically
contaminated concrete structures whereby volumes of regulated
wastes requiring disposal are minimized by: 1) the use of
engineering techniques during the demolition process to segregate
the clean from the contaminated waste fraction, and/or 2) the re-
use of the contaminated concrete in the manufacture of waste
storage or disposal containers. Explosive demolition is used to
either selectively remove contaminated surface layers of concrete
from underlying uncontaminated concrete (where the contamination
is confined to the surface layers), or, where the contamination
is throughout the concrete, to reduce contaminated concrete into
pieces of an appropriate size for use as aggregate. If further
size reduction is required for use as aggregate, the concrete
pieces are processed through a concrete crusher until the
appropriate size is achieved. Once released for use, the
recycled aggregate is shipped to a concrete manufacturing plant
where it is used to produce concrete for the manufacture of waste

CA 0220~947 1997-0~-23
CASE 5804
storage/disposal containers, vaults, or cells. Wastes
stored/disposed in these containers would include radiological
or hazardous chemically contaminated waste, contaminated building
rubble, contaminated processing equipment, and other similar
debris. In addition, any clean uncontaminated concrete itself
resulting from the demolition of nuclear facilities can be reused
for the manufacture of these containers by heating the crushed
clean concrete in a conventional recycle kiln.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
Those portions of an existing nuclear facility or similar
facilities, such as a chemical processing plant, which are
constructed from concrete or other cementatious material are
demolished using engineered explosions or controlled demolition
methods to either selectively delaminate the contaminated surface
layers from uncontaminated concrete below (where the
contamination is confined to the surface layers), or, where the
contamination is throughout the concrete, to reduce the resulting
rubble to a size appropriate for use as a manufacturing
aggregate. The use of explosive demolition techniques reduces
the potential for personnel exposure to radiation or other
hazardous chemicals, consistent with Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Environmental Protection Agency and Department of
Energy "As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA)" concepts, as
well as achieving the demolition of the structures in the safest
manner possible.
If the concrete below the surface layers is uncontaminated,
following removal of the delaminated (contaminated surface)

CA 0220~947 1997-0~-23
CASE 5804
layers, the remainder of the concrete structure can alternatively
be demolished using standard construction techniques, and the
resulting rubble free released for recycling or disposal. At any
rate, the reduced contaminated concrete material is then measured
to determine if it will pass through the appropriate sieves, for
use as manufacturing aggregate, in a concrete plant. If the
concrete requires further size reduction, it is then processed
by use of a concrete crusher to insure that the appropriate
manufacturing aggregate size is achieved. This may be done at
the site by providing a mobile concrete crusher.
The aggregate is then statistically sampled and analyzed for
radionuclide and/or hazardous chemical content to insure that the
rubble meets both plant requirements for aggregate use
(principally physical size and chemical composition) and burial
site license requirements for use as storage or disposal
containers/vaults/cells.
The aggregate is then used in the manufacture of storage or
disposal containers, vaults, cells, etc. for a wide variety of
radiological, hazardous chemical, or "mixed wastes" produced
during the decontamination and decommissioning of nuclear
facilities and/or similar facilities such as chemical processing
plants or waste disposal facilities.
It should be understood that the contaminated aggregate may
also be used in the manufacture of other concrete structures such
as roads, radiation shielding, etc.
Because many varying and differing embodiments may be made
within the scope of the inventive concept herein taught and

CA 0220~947 1997-0~-23
-6- CASE 5804
because many modifications may be made in the embodiment herein
detailed in accordance with the descriptive requirement of the
law, it is to be understood that the details herein are to be
interpreted as illustrative and not in a limiting sense.

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 2205947 was not found.

Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: IPC expired 2022-01-01
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Inactive: Dead - No reply to s.30(2) Rules requisition 2001-08-10
Application Not Reinstated by Deadline 2001-08-10
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 2001-05-23
Inactive: Abandoned - No reply to s.30(2) Rules requisition 2000-08-10
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2000-04-10
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 1999-11-26
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 1999-10-13
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 1997-11-30
Inactive: IPC assigned 1997-09-10
Classification Modified 1997-09-10
Inactive: IPC assigned 1997-08-25
Inactive: IPC assigned 1997-08-25
Classification Modified 1997-08-25
Inactive: First IPC assigned 1997-08-25
Letter Sent 1997-07-29
Filing Requirements Determined Compliant 1997-07-29
Inactive: Filing certificate - RFE (English) 1997-07-29
Inactive: Applicant deleted 1997-07-25
Application Received - Regular National 1997-07-25
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 1997-05-23
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 1997-05-23

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2001-05-23

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2000-05-09

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
Application fee - standard 1997-05-23
Registration of a document 1997-05-23
Request for examination - standard 1997-05-23
MF (application, 2nd anniv.) - standard 02 1999-05-24 1999-05-05
MF (application, 3rd anniv.) - standard 03 2000-05-23 2000-05-09
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
THE BABCOCK & WILCOX COMPANY
THE BABCOCK & WILCOX COMPANY
Past Owners on Record
CHARLES PAUL PIETSCH
JOHN BERNARD MEYERS
RICHARD SEYMOUR KINGSLEY
TIMOTHY CARTER MARKS
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Description 1997-05-23 6 221
Abstract 1997-05-23 1 36
Claims 1997-05-23 2 60
Cover Page 1998-01-20 1 67
Claims 1999-11-26 2 57
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 1997-07-29 1 118
Filing Certificate (English) 1997-07-29 1 165
Reminder of maintenance fee due 1999-01-26 1 110
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (R30(2)) 2000-09-21 1 171
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Maintenance Fee) 2001-06-20 1 182
Fees 2000-05-09 1 31
Fees 1999-05-05 1 29