Language selection

Search

Patent 2206899 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2206899
(54) English Title: PROCEDURE FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF PAPER
(54) French Title: PROCEDURE POUR LA FABRICATION DE PAPIER
Status: Deemed expired
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • D21F 9/00 (2006.01)
  • D21H 17/00 (2006.01)
  • D21H 23/00 (2006.01)
  • D21H 23/04 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • NYGARD, STINA (Finland)
  • KAROJARVI, RISTO (Finland)
  • SJOGREN, PERTTI (Finland)
(73) Owners :
  • M-REAL OYJ (Finland)
(71) Applicants :
  • NYGARD, STINA (Finland)
  • KAROJARVI, RISTO (Finland)
  • SJOGREN, PERTTI (Finland)
(74) Agent: DENNISON ASSOCIATES
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2007-12-18
(22) Filed Date: 1997-06-04
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 1997-12-28
Examination requested: 2002-04-12
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
FI-962701 Finland 1996-06-28

Abstracts

English Abstract

A procedure for the manufacture of paper, in which procedure at least one mechanical pulp compo-nent, binding agent and other components are mixed so as to form paper pulp, the paper pulp is made into a web and the web is dried. According to the invention, the mechanical pulp component and the binding agent are mixed together and the other components are mixed with the mechanical pulp component after it has been mixed with the binding agent.


French Abstract

Une procédure pour la fabrication de papier, dans laquelle procédure au moins un composant de pâte mécanique, un agent liant et d'autres composants sont mélangés de manière à former la pâte à papier, la pâte à papier est faite sous forme de bande et la bande est séchée. Selon l'invention, le composant de pâte mécanique et l'agent de liaison sont mélangés ensemble et les autres composants sont mélangés avec le composant de pâte mécanique après qu'elle ait été mélangée avec l'agent liant.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.




7


THE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION IN WHICH AN EXCLUSIVE
PROPERTY OR PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:



1. Procedure for the manufacture of paper, in which
procedure at least one mechanical pulp component, a binding
agent and other components are mixed so as to form paper
pulp, the paper pulp is made into a web and the web is
dried; characterized in that the mechanical pulp component
and the binding agent are mixed together and the other
components are mixed with the mechanical pulp component
after it has been mixed with the binding agent.

2. Procedure as defined in claim 1, characterized in
that the mechanical pulp component is postrefined prior to
mixing with the binding agent.

3. Procedure as defined in claim 1, characterized in
that the mechanical pulp component is postrefined together
with the binding agent.

4. Procedure as defined in claim 2 or 3, characterized
in that the postrefining is performed at a consistency of 2
to 45%.

5. Procedure as defined in claim 2, 3 or 4,
characterized in that the postrefining is performed at a
consistency of 3 to 18%.

6. Procedure as defined in any one of claims 2 to 5,
characterized in that the energy consumption in the
postrefining is 10 to 100 kWh/t.

7. Procedure as defined in any one of claims 1 to 6,
characterized in that the mechanical pulp contains
components selected from the group consisting of groundwood,
refiner groundwood, recycled pulp containing groundwood and
recycled pulp containing refiner groundwood.



8


8. Procedure as defined in ay one of claims 1 to 7,
characterized in that the amount of mechanical pulp
contained in the paper pulp is 10 to 80 wt-%.

9. Procedure as define din any one of claims 1 to 8
characterized in that the amount of mechanical pulp
contained in the paper pulp is 25 to 60 weight percentage.
10. Procedure as defined in any one of claims 1 to 9,
characterized in that the amount of binding agent contained
in the paper pulp is over 0.5%.

11. Procedure as defined in any one of claims 1 to 10 in
that the amount of binding agent contained in the paper pulp
is in the range of .5 to 3%.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.



CA 02206899 1997-06-04
1

PROCEDURE FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF PAPER

The present invention relates to a procedure
for the manufacture of paper, in which procedure at
least one mechanical pulp component, a binding agent
and other components are mixed to form paper pulp, the
paper pulp is made into a web and the web is dried
and, if desired, finished.
In the present application, 'paper' refers to
web-like products generally produced by means of a pa-
per or cardboard machine and containing cellulose fib-
res and/or lignocellulose fibres, products which are
either coated or uncoated, thinner or thicker, consis-
ting of one or more layers, and which are generally
called paper or cardboard.
The present patent application does not con-
tain a more detailed description of the formation of a
paper web from paper pulp in a paper machine, the dry-
ing of the web or the possible finishing; as for these
matters, reference is made to the methods generally
known in the industry and to relevant literature.
The quality requirements regarding different
paper sorts are continuously growing. In the case of
printing paper, excessively fast drying of the prin-
ting ink may result in a rough paper surface and the
formation of steam bubbles, which may lead to cracking
of the paper while the surface remains undamaged- This
problem is encountered especially when the z-strength
or internal bond strength of the paper is too low. The
problem is particularly difficult in the case of paper
that has been manufactured using a high-intensity for-
mer for web formation.
As for the features characteristic of the in-
vention, reference is made to the claims.
The invention is based on research work in
which it was established that the internal bond
strength of paper can be increased by mixing a mecha-
nical pulp component and a binding agent together and


CA 02206899 1997-06-04
2

adding the other pulp components to this mixture at a
later stage.
Particularly good results have been reached
by postrefining the mechanical pulp component and mi-
xing the binding agent into the postrefined mechanical
pulp component.
Similarly, very good results have been
reached by performing the postrefining of the mechani-
cal pulp component after the binding agent has been
added to it.
The invention allow2 the binding agent to
spread uniformly into the mechanical pulp component
and get bound with it. At the same time, when postre-
fining is employed, there appear in the pulp component
new fibre surfaces, to which the binding agenz can ef-
fectively adhere-
The postrefining is done at a desired pulp
consistency, e.g. over 210, and for high-consistency
pulps up to 45 a; thus, the refining can preferably be
implemented at a consistency of e.g. 3 - 18 %.
The energy consumption in postrefining may
vary within broad limits and is e.g. 10 - 100 kWh/ton,
preferably e.g. of the order of 10 - 20 - 70 kWh/ton.
- In the procedure of the invention, the postrefining
can be performed using any type of pulp refiner, as is
generally known in paper and pulp technology.
The mechanical pulp used is any kind of
mechanical pulp, e.g. groundwood, refiner groundwood
or recycled pulp containing groundwood and/or refiner
groundwood or a mixture of these in arbitrary propor-
tions. The pulp used in making printing paper, to
which the invention appertains in particular, is gene-
rally pulp defibrated, sortad and bleached in a known
manner
The mechanical pulp may be.=produced from any
sort of wood, stalked plants or in general from any
vegetable fibre, e.g. broad-leaved trees, coniferous


CA 02206899 1997-06-04
3
trees, straw, reeds, etc.
Paper produced according to the invention may
contain mechanical pulp in arbitrary proportions as is
generally known in paper industry, e.g. 10 - 80 wt-%,
usually 20 - 60 wt-a.
The proportion of binding agent added into
the mechanical pulp may be as is ganerally known in
paper industry, e.g. 2 - 3 a, even more, e.g. up to 5
a. The binding agent may be any binding agent commonly
used in paper industry. The binding agent may be e.g.
selected from groups starch derivatives, galacto man-
nones, cellulose derivatives, acryl amides, different
types of polymeric dispersions (i.e. latexes), etc.
The binding agents may be non-ionic, anionic or catio-
nic. Accordingly e-g. following binding agents are
mentioned: natural xanthan gums, such as arabic gum,
ghatti gum, pectin, dragacanth, karaya, alagin, gua-
rar, guarin, carubin or other non-modified or modified
anionic or cationic polysaccharide compounds; amylo-
pectines and other starch derivatives and starches;
CMC, ethylcellulose, hydroxyethylcellulose and other
cellulose derivatives; modified cationic or anionic or
non-ionic binding agents, as are generally known in
paper industry (e.g. US patent 5104487).
Moreover, the paper pulp may contain any ot-
her known additives, such as fillers, agents improving
a certain property or certain properties of paper, co-
lorants, pigments, etc., as is known in ihe art.
In the following, the invention is described
in detail by the aid of a few examples of its embodi-
ments, reference being made to Fig. 1, which repre-
sents the Scott-bond strength of paper produced using
different binding agents and different mixing methods.
Example 1
This experiment was carried out to study the
effect of the binding agent on the properties of paper
manufactured from hardwood mechanical pulp when the


CA 02206899 1997-06-04
4

binder was added, to non-postrefined pulp, the binder
and Lhe pulp were postrefined together or when the
binder was added to postrefined pulp. The pulp used
had been bleached with hydrogen peroxide, dosed at 1.0
a.
Postrefining was performed using a EW labora-
tory refiner, SCE 100 kWh/ton. When the binder was ad-
ded before the refining, the chemical was added into
the pulp, the pulp was mixed for 25 min. and analysed,
the pulp was refined, mixed for 25 mi.n. and analysed.
When the chemical was added after the refining, the
pulp was mixed for 25 min., the pulp was refined, the
binding agent was added into the pulp, the pulp was
mixed for 25 min. and then analysed.
The chemicals used were starch, 2 a; CMC, 0.5
a; and modified polysaccharide, 2 a_ The experiment
also included a 50-min. mixing time with modified po-
lysaccharide. In addition, a 0-test without a binder
and postrefining without a binder were carried out.
The results are shown in Table 1.
Table 1
Scott-bond
J/m2
No binder 1 148 Mixing time 25 min_
2 231 "
Starch 1 385
2 2 380
3 482 "
Modified 1 339
Polysaccharide 2 408
2 95 3 470

CMC 1 160
0.5 0 2 216
3 231


CA 02206899 1997-06-04
'5

Modified Poly- 1 346
saccharide 2 % 3 417

In the table, denotation 1 means binder ad-
ded, no refining; 2 means binder added and refined to-
gether with the pulp component; and 3 means binder ad-
ded afLer the refining. The reaults are also shown in
a graphic format in Fig. 1.
According to the test results, mixing the
binding agent in postrefined pulp or postrefining the
pulp after the mixing clearly increased the bond
atrength of paper produced from the pulp.

Example 2
This experiment was carried out to study the
effect of the poztrefining power on the properties of
paper produced from the pulp. Pulp prepared in a man-
ner corresponding to Example 1 was used in the experi-
ment, the postrefiriing power levels (PR SCE) were 0,
50 and 75 kWh/ton. The mixing times were 0, 20 min.,
40 min. and 60 min. The additive used was modified po-
lysaccharide, 2 %. The refining was performed using an
industrial-scale refiner.
The bond strength values of paper produced
from the pulp are shown in Table 2-

Table 2

Pulp 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2
Binder None None None None 2% 2% 20 2% 2~
Mixing
time/min 0 0 0 0 20 40 60 60 60
PR SCE/
kWh/ton 0 50 75 0 0 0 0 50 75
Bond
Strength 203 277 305 195 315 301 307 391 506


CA 02206899 1997-06-04
6
Example 3
This experiment was carried out to study as a
laboratory test the effect of binding agent on pulp
when the binding agent was added after the refining
treatment. In addition, the use of starch at two dos-
age levels was tested. The table shows as a reference
the results of a pilot test carried out with the same
pulp; in this test, the chemical was added before the
postrefining. The pulp used had been produced in a
manner corresponding to Examples 1 and 2.
The results are shown in Table 3.
Table 3

Laboratory test Pilot test
Additions of binding agent Refin.+ Refin.
1.5a 2.0'0~- 2.0% chem. ref.
starch starch mod. polys-
Bond J/m2 450 449 489 482 271
Tensile
Index Nm/g 41.3 41.0 43.6 38.3 36.3
According to the test results, adding the
binding agent after the refining increased the bond
strength and tensile index of a paper sheet made from
the pulp even more than adding it in conjunction with
the refining.
The embodiment examples are only intended to
illustrate the invention without limiting it in any
way, and the embodiments may vary within the scope of
the claims presented below.

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 2206899 was not found.

Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date 2007-12-18
(22) Filed 1997-06-04
(41) Open to Public Inspection 1997-12-28
Examination Requested 2002-04-12
(45) Issued 2007-12-18
Deemed Expired 2013-06-04

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2005-06-06 FAILURE TO PAY APPLICATION MAINTENANCE FEE 2005-06-27

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Application Fee $300.00 1997-06-04
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 2 1999-06-04 $100.00 1999-05-19
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 3 2000-06-05 $100.00 2000-05-25
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 4 2001-06-04 $100.00 2001-05-15
Request for Examination $400.00 2002-04-12
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 5 2002-06-04 $150.00 2002-04-12
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 6 2003-06-04 $150.00 2003-05-22
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 7 2004-06-04 $200.00 2004-05-26
Reinstatement: Failure to Pay Application Maintenance Fees $200.00 2005-06-27
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 8 2005-06-06 $200.00 2005-06-27
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 9 2006-06-05 $200.00 2006-05-25
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 10 2007-06-04 $250.00 2007-06-04
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 2007-09-12
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 2007-09-12
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 2007-09-12
Final Fee $300.00 2007-09-12
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 11 2008-06-04 $250.00 2008-05-28
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 12 2009-06-04 $450.00 2009-06-11
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 13 2010-06-04 $450.00 2010-12-03
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 14 2011-06-06 $250.00 2011-05-19
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
M-REAL OYJ
Past Owners on Record
KAROJARVI, RISTO
METSA-SERLA OY
METSA-SERLA OYJ
NYGARD, STINA
SJOGREN, PERTTI
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Cover Page 1998-02-05 1 49
Abstract 1997-06-04 1 13
Description 1997-06-04 6 232
Claims 1997-06-04 1 41
Drawings 1997-06-04 1 22
Claims 2006-04-25 2 54
Cover Page 2007-11-16 1 27
Assignment 1997-06-04 3 104
Prosecution-Amendment 2002-04-12 1 37
Prosecution-Amendment 2006-04-25 4 93
Prosecution-Amendment 2005-06-14 2 75
Fees 2005-06-27 2 34
Prosecution-Amendment 2005-11-18 2 75
Correspondence 2007-09-12 1 37
Assignment 2007-09-12 6 159
Fees 2010-12-03 1 29