Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
CA 02229391 1998-02-12
WO 96/32156 PCT/US96104900
_1_
Description
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation Device
for Unassisted Nerve Blockade
Background of the Invention
The present invention relates to an apparatus for
locating and anesthetizing peripheral nerves during the
performance of a regional nerve blockade procedure.
More particularly, the present invention relates to an
apparatus including a remote foot pedal which enables
independent, hands free, operation of the apparatus.
Further, the foot pedal enables the operator to finely
control the level of stimulus used to locate and
stimulate a peripheral nerve.
Today's consumer demands that medical care be not
only efficacious, but cost-effective as well. These
forces have had a dynamic changing effect on the field
of anesthesia, and in particular on the practice of
regional anesthesia.
The practice of regional anesthesia, the adminis-
tration of anesthesia to a specific body region, is
entering a renaissance. An increasing number of
patients are receiving anesthetic nerve blocks during
surgery, for the relief of post-operative pain, and for
the extended relief of chronic pain. Numerous studies
have shown that regional anesthesia is often preferable
fo the use of general anesthesia because of increased
safety and patient satisfaction, excellent post-
operative pain control, and a decrease in anesthesia
costs.
The goal of all regional anesthesia techniques is
to deliver a pool of local anesthetic into close
CA 02229391 1998-02-12
WO 96!32156 PCT/US96/04900
-2-
contact with a peripheral nerve, thereby enabling
neuronal blockade to occur. Typically, a syringe
containing a solution of local anesthetic, with a
needle attached to it, is utilized to perform the ,
blockade of a peripheral nerve. Because the nerve to
be blocked is not visible, various methods have been
developed to insure that the needle is adjacent to the
nerve before the solution of local anesthetic is
injected.
The traditional method for ensuring that the
needle i~a in close proximity to the nerve to be blocked
involves eliciting paresthesia (a buzzing or tingling
sensation reported by the patient to the physician).
While the paresthesia technique usually produces a
reliable blockade, one must often touch the nerve to
elicit a response, which can cause permanent damage to
the nerve. Further, a needle that passes even half a
centimeter from the nerve frequently will not produce
paresthesia and, yet, in many situations, this would be
close enough to produce an effective block. Obviously,
the success rate of a nerve block will be low when the
patient gives an inaccurate report of paresthesia or
when the patient is disoriented, sedated or otherwise
not fully functional.
In an effort to increase the success rate of a
nerve block, some anesthesiologists x-ray patients
before administering an anesthetic solution to
determine the exact location of the anesthesia needle
vis-a-vis the 'target nerve. Although somewhat helpful,
this technique is impractical, expensive, and not
always readily available.
More recently, peripheral nerve stimulators, which
forward an electrical stimulus to the anesthesia
needle, have been used as a means of effectively
locating peripheral nerves. Nerve localization via
electrical stimulation is based on the fact that an
CA 02229391 1998-02-12
WO 96/32156 PCT/US96/04900
electrical pulse can stimulate a motor nerve fiber to
contract an innervated muscle or cause paresthesia in
the case of sensory nerve stimulation.
When localizing a nerve using a nerve stimulator,
an electrified anesthesia needle having a current of
approximately 2-3 mA is placed within the tissue of the
body in the vicinity of the nerve to be blocked. The
needle is then slowly advanced as a stimulating probe
until stimulation of the target nerve is achieved, as
determined by visually detecting muscle contractions or
by eliciting a report that the patient feels the
stimulus. Once a response is observed, the current is
gradually decreased as the needle is moved closer to
the nerve, until nerve stimulation is obtained using a
lower amperage current. Typically, response at a lower
amperage (0.2-0.5 mA) assures that the tip of the
needle is in close proximity to the nerve, therefore
providing a reliable nerve blockade with injection of
the local anesthetic.
Once a response has been observed in the 0.2-0.5
mA range, a small portion of the anesthetic dose is
administered to the patient as a test dose to terminate
the response of the nerve to the electrical pulse. The
output current a.s then once again increased to assure
that the cessation of the response is a result of the
nerve blockade, rather than unintentional repositioning
of the needle away from the nerve. If a nerve response
is still absent after the output 'current has been
increased, the anesthesia needle is deemed to be in the
vicinity of the target nerve and the remaining dose of
' the local anesthetic solution is injected.
The same technique can be employed regardless of
' whether the nerve to be localized is motor or sensory.
A description of this nerve localization technique is
discussed in greater detail in Raj et al., "Use of the
CA 02229391 1998-02-12
WO 96/32156 PCT/CTS96/04900
-4-
Nerve Stimulator.for Peripheral Blocks", Regional
Anesthesia, April-June 1980, pp. 14-21.
A debate has ensued among anesthesiologists as to
whether the paresthesia technique or the peripheral .
nerve stimulation (PNS) technique is preferable. One
obvious advantage of the PNS technique is that it
causes minimal discomfort to the patients since the low
stimulating currents that are used (0.2 to 2.0 mA)
readily stimulate the larger A-alpha motor fibers
resulting in painless muscle twitching. This is in
contrast to the paresthesia technique which seeks to
stimulate the C pain fibers, thereby causing varying
degrees of pain or discomfort. The other advantage of
PNS is that patient cooperation is not needed during
the procedure, so that nerve blockade can be performed
in an anesthetized patient. The incidence of nerve
damage may also be decreased compared to the
paresthesia technique since the probing needle does not
have to touch or puncture the nerve. Further, the
success rate of PNS is equal to or greater than the use
of paresthesia.
However, manipulating the current of the generator
by one anesthesiologist without additional help is very
inconvenient and cumbersome or can cause unintentional
repositioning of the needle.
Thus, one significant disadvantage, typically
identified with the use of the PNS technique, is the
frequent need :Eor an entourage of helpers for the
anesthesiologist to carry out the procedure. Because
most anesthesiologists use a strictly sterile technique
while performing a nerve block, the use of a nerve
stimulator during administration of regional anesthesia
is generally thought to require an extra person. While
in a teaching institution this is usually not an
important issue, in a busy private practice, where
extra personnel are not readily available, it may
CA 02229391 1998-02-12
WO 96/32156 PCT/US96/04900
present a significant disadvantage. Because PNS
. involves frequent changing of the current as the needle
advances towards the nerve, there presently exists a
significant divergence of opinion about the
practicality of utilizing nerve stimulators for
peripheral nerve blocks.
Examples of nerve stimulators for assisting in the
administration of anesthesia may be found in U.S.
Patent No. 3,682,162 to Coyler and U.S. Patent No.
4,515,168 to Chester et al. The Coyler patent
generally describes a combined electrode and syringe
needle which acts as a stimulation probe when the
syringe needle is connected to an electrical supply.
The Chester et al. patent discloses a nerve
stimulator which is clamped onto the syringe of a
conventional syringe and anesthesia needle assembly.
The unit contains a power supply, a pulse generating
circuit, and a manually controlled current-adjusting
potentiometer which allows the operator to adjust the
current supplied to the needle.
Although the above-identified devices are
effective in stimulating peripheral nerves and have
been used in the practice of regional anesthesia, they
have some significant disadvantages. As previously
mentioned, when using these devices, an
anesthesiologist must manually adjust the strength of
the electrical current. This could potentially cause a
number of problems. First, an attempt to manipulate
the control knob will draw the anesthesiologist's
attention away from the blockade procedure. This
distraction may result in the needle being mis-
positioned within the body or even result in permanent
~ damage to the peripheral nerve. Alternatively, the
requirement for an assistant to adjust the control knob
can result in the misuse of scarce personnel.
CA 02229391 1998-02-12
WO 96/32156 PCT/US96/04900
-6-
Recently, a more advanced peripheral nerve
stimulator has been disclosed in U.S. Patent No.
5,284,153 to Raymond et al., which discloses a device
that includes an anesthesia needle coupled to an .
electrical source, and a device for detecting nerve
response to the electrical stimuli. The amount of
current generated by the electrical source is
automatically controlled so as to maintain the signal
generated as a function of the response of the nerve to
the stimuli. The closer the stimulating needle comes
to the nerve, the higher the detected responses will
be, which in turn will automatically decrease the
electrical stimulus.
Although Raymond et al. solves some of the
problems discussed above, this device has some inherent
problems. First, its satisfactory performance requires
the accurate placement of both the needle used to
perform the block and the sensing unit which detects a
muscle response. If the sensing unit is not placed at
an appropriate location, then the apparatus will be
unable to efficaciously locate the nerve.
Second, the Raymond et al. device is likely to be
significantly more expensive and.labor intensive due to
its complexity. For example, the patent discloses the
response detecting device in a form of electrodes
similar to those used for electromyography, with a
variable high-gain amplifier. The response signal is
then converted into a digital signal and fed to a
stimulus delivering device which utilizes a rather
complicated, microcomputer based means for determining
the amplitude of the next stimulus to be delivered. A
Therefore, these devices are not likely to be of a
portable pocket size which is the case with modern PNS
simulators.
Finally, while automation may mean convenience, it
may also present a disadvantage when the
CA 02229391 1998-02-12
WO 96!32156 PCT/US96/04900
_,_
anesthesiologist has difficulty locating the nerve,
requiring an increase in the stimulating current, such
as in obese patients. In these instances, the operator
must then switch to manual control, as described in the
Raymond et al. disclosure, which brings back the same
disadvantages inherent in older units, i.e., requires
another person.
Summary of the Invention
Therefore, the broad object of this invention is
to provide an improved peripheral nerve stimulator
having certain features similar to those currently
available, but with foot pedal means for remotely
controlling the amount of current delivered, thereby
allowing an anesthesiologist to perform an unassisted
nerve blockade.
Another object of the invention is to provide an
improved peripheral nerve stimulator which enables the
maintenance of sterility during the entire nerve
blockade procedure.
A further object of the invention is to provide an
improved peripheral nerve stimulator which enables an
operator to infinitely adjust, within a selected range,
the magnitude of electrical stimulus supplied to the
anesthesia needle.
Still a further object of the invention is to
provide for an improved peripheral nerve stimulator
which does not require exact positioning of a response
detecting means to ensure satisfactory performance of
the blockade procedure.
Thus, the various features of the invention
include an electrical stimulus generator for providing
an electrical stimulus within a selected range. The
generator has one or more control knobs for designating
the selected range of the electrical stimulus. The
invention is also adapted for accepting a syringe for
CA 02229391 1998-02-12
WO 96/32156 PCT/LTS96/04900
_g_
storing and administering an anesthetic and a tube.
The tube has a first end which is. connected to the
syringe and a second end which is adapted to accept an
insulated anesthesia needle. One end of the syringe is
formed f-.or connecting to a disposable insulated
anesthesia needle. An electronic cable connects the
needle to the generator to provide electrical current
to the needle. Also connected to the generator via a
coupling cable is a remotely located foot-operated
pedal. An operator can manipulate the pedal with his
or her foot to both control and infinitely modify,
within the initial selected range, the magnitude of the
electrical stimulus. For example, if the
anesthesiologist initially selects a maximum stimulus
of 2mA, then the range of the electrical stimulus will
be between OinA and 2mA. If the anesthesiologist
selects 5mA, then the available range will be between
OmA and 5mA. Use of the remote foot pedal leaves the
operator's hands free for the nerve blockade procedure,
so that an assistant is not required.
The foot pedal is not spring loaded, but works on
the leverage principle. The operator can pivot the
pedal to a desired position, corresponding to a
selected stimulus level, and then remove his or her
foot from the pedal. The position of the pedal will
not change when the foot is subsequently removed,
therefore the stimulus level will remain constant until
the pedal is manipulated once again.
The invention also discloses a method for
utilizing the inventive apparatus. According to the
inventive method, the apparatus is used by designating
a selected range for an electrical stimulus. Next, an
electrical stimulus is generated within the selected r
range. The anesthesia needle is then inserted into the
tissue of the body in the vicinity of the nerve to be
located, and an operator looks for a response by the
CA 02229391 1998-02-12
WO 96132156 PCT/US96/04900
_g_
nerve (i.e., twitch of the muscles innervated by the
nerve being blocked, or a paresthesia sensation in the
sensory distribution of the nerve sought). If a
response is observed, the output current of the
generator is decreased by manipulating the remote foot
pedal and the needle is further advanced towards the
nerve until a response of equal intensity is once again
obtained. The precise placement of the needle is
assured by decreasing the electrical output current of
the nerve stimulator as the needle approaches the
peripheral nerve. If the response is lost upon further
advancement of the needle, it can be obtained by either
withdrawing the needle or by increasing the output
current using the foot pedal control.
If an adequate response is observed with a current
0.1 to 0.5 mA (Raj), the nerve is deemed to have been
"found" or located. A small test portion of the
anesthetic is then administered to the patient as a
test dose to terminate the response of the nerve to the
electrical pulse. After an .amount of time sufficient
for the anesthetic to take effect, the output current
is once again increased to 2-3 mA to assure that the
cessation of the response is the result of effective
nerve blockade, rather than 'the unintentional
repositioning of the needle away from the nerve. If no
further nerve response is observed, the anesthesia
needle is deemed to be in the vicinity of the target
nerve and the remaining dose of anesthetic is injected.
Although the above-described technique requires
frequent current changes for the best results, the
w described method and adaptation of the nerve stimulator
of the present invention allows a solo anesthesiologist
to achieve a totally independent, comfortable, and
efficacious performance of the nerve blockade.
CA 02229391 1998-02-12
WO 96/32156 PCT/CTS96/04900
-10-
Brief Description of the Drawing
Various objects, features and attendant advantages -
of the present invention will be more fully appreciated
as the same becomes better understood from the
following detailed description of the present invention
when considered in connection with the accompanying
drawings, in which:
Fig. 1 shows a perspective view of the present
invention;
Fig. 2 shows a top view of a peripheral nerve
stimulator utilized in the present invention;
Fig. 3 shows the peripheral nerve stimulator of
Fig. 2 including a foot pedal cable, a stimulus cable
and a ground cable;
Fig. 4 shows a top view of a foot pedal utilized
in the present invention;
Fig. 5 shows a side view of the foot pedal in Fig.
4; and
Fig. 6 shows a side view of a syringe and
anesthesia needle utilized in the present invention.
Detailed Description of the Invention
With reference to Figs. 1-3, there is shown a
peripheral nerve stimulator apparatus 10 having an
electrical stimulus generator 12 for providing an
electrical stimulus within a selected range. The
generator 12 has one or more control knobs 14 for
CA 02229391 1998-02-12
WO 96/32156 PCT/US96/04900
-7.1-
designating the selected range of the electrical
- stimulus. One preferred generator used in the present
invention is a "DUAL STIM PLUS" nerve stimulator, model
NS-2CA, produced by Life-Tech, Inc., in Houston, Texas.
However, any analog or digital nerve stimulator
currently on the market can be modified to operate with
the present invention.
Referring to Figs. 1 and 6, the apparatus 10 is
adapted for accepting a syringe 16 for storing and
administering an anesthetic and a tube 18. The tube
has a first end 20 which is connected to the syringe 16
and a second end 22 which is adapted to accept an
insulated anesthesia needle. The syringe 16 includes a
plunger 26 for forcing the anesthetic into the tube 18.
Referring to Figs. 1 and 3, an electronic cable 28
connects the needle 24 to the generator 12 for
delivering the electrical stimulus to the needle 24,
thereby allowing the electrical stimulus to be
delivered to a nerve N.
The apparatus 10 also h.as a grounding wire 30
having a first end 32 connected to the stimulus
generator 12 and a second end 34 connected to a patient
P. The grounding wire 30 enables the electrical
connection to be completed.
Referring to Fig. 6, the anesthesia needle 24 has
a first end 36 which is inserted into the patient P and
a second end 38 having a hub 40. The hub 40 is adapted
CA 02229391 1998-02-12
WO 96/32156 PCT/US96/04900
-12-
for accepting the second end 22 of the tube 18 and the
electronic connector 28.
Referring to Figs. 1, 3, 4 and 5, also connected
to the generator 12 via a coupling cable 42 is a
remotely located foot-operated pedal 44. An operator
can manipulate the pedal 44 with his or her foot to
both control and infinitely modify, within the selected
range, the magnitude of the electrical stimulus. For
example, if an anesthesiologist utilizes the control
knob 14 (Fig. 2) to select a maximum stimulus of 2mA,
then the range of the electrical stimulus can be
modified between OmA and 2mA by moving the position of
the foot pedal 44. If the anesthesiologist selects 5mA
with the control knob 14, then the available range will
be between OmA and 5mA. Use of the remote foot pedal
44 leaves the operator's hands free fcr the nerve
blockade procedure,_thereby obviating the need for an
assistant. Further, use of the pedal allows the
anesthesiologist to concentrate solely on the position
of the needle 24 and the patient's P nerve response.
Referring to Figs. 4 and 5, the foot pedal 44 is
not spring loaded, but works on the leverage principle.
The operator can pivot the pedal around a pivot point
46 to the desired position, one which corresponds to a
desired stimulus level, and then remove his or her foot
from the pedal 44. The position of the pedal 44 will
not change when the foot is subsequently removed,
CA 02229391 1998-02-12
WO 96/32156 PC'T/U596/04900
-13-
therefore, the stimulus level will remain constant
- until the pedal 44 is once again manipulated.
One preferred foot pedal 44 is a "KORG" one
channel volume pedal, model KVP-001. However, any foot
controlled variable resistor pedal can be used to
achieve the same results.
Referring to Fig. 3, the stimulus generator 12 has
4
been modified by the additian of a coupling jack 48 so
that the foot pedal 44 can be electronically coupled to
the generator 12. The addition of the jack 48 is an
essential feature of the invention because it enables
the operator to modify the generated stimulus by
manipulating the foot pedal 44.
Referring to Fig. 1, before starting the
procedure, a grounding pad 50 is placed on a patient's
P body. The grounding pad 50 is connected to the
grounding wire 30, which in turn is connected to the
stimulus generator 12. The operator then turns the
control knob 14 to designate a desired electrical
stimulus range. Next, a switch is engaged in order to
send electrical power to the stimulus generator 12,
thereby generating an electrical stimulus within the
selected range. The first end 36 of the anesthesia
needle 24 is then inserted into the tissue of the
patient P in the vicinity of the nerve N to be located.
After the needle 24 has been inserted in the vicinity
of the nerve N, the operator depresses the foot pedal
CA 02229391 1998-02-12
WO 96/32156 PCT/LTS96/04900
-14-
44 to increase the magnitude of the electrical
stimulus. The operator then looks for a response by
the nerve N (i.e., twitch of the muscles innervated by
the nerve being blocked, or a paresthesia sensation in
the sensory distribution of the nerve sought). If a
response is observed, the output current of the
generator 7_2 is decreased by manipulating the remote
foot pedal 44 and the needle 24 is further advanced
towards the nerve N until a response of equal intensity
is once again obtained. The precise placement of the
needle 24 is assured by decreasing the electrical
output current of the nerve stimulator 12 as the needle
24 approaches the peripheral nerve N. If the response
is being lost by further advancement of the needle 24,
it is sought again by withdrawing the needle 24 or by
manipulating the foot pedal 44 to increase the output
current sent to the anesthesia needle 24.
After an adequate response is observed with a
current 0.1 to 0.5 mA (Raj), the nerve N is deemed to
have been "found" or located. A small test portion of
the anesthetic is then administered to the patient as a
test dose to terminate the response of the nerve to the
electrical stimulus. After sufficient time is allowed
to elapse a.n order for the anesthetic to take effect,
the output current is once again increased to 2-3 mA to
assure that the cessation of the response is the result
of effective nerve blockade, rather than the
CA 02229391 1998-02-12
WO 96!32156 PCT/US96/04900
-15-
unintentional repositioning of the needle 24 away from
~ the nerve N. If no further nerve response is observed,
the anesthesia needle 24 is deemed to be in the
vicinity of the target nerve N and the remaining dose
of anesthetic is injected.
Experimental Tests
To evaluate the performance of the present
invention, various experiments were performed.
In vivo experiments were performed on three volun-
teers. A hand-held 22 G insulated needle, which served
as stimulating probe was attached to a modified nerve
stimulator "DUAL STIM PLUS", model NS-2CA, Life-Tech,
Inc., Houston, Texas. Then, the needle was introduced
through the skin in the femoral fossa, aiming towards
the femoral nerve. Once the needle was under the skin,
the foot pedal was pressed to set the stimulating
current output to 2 mA. Once twitches in the
quadriceps muscle were observed, the current was
gradually decreased end the needle further advanced.
These maneuvers were repeated until the twitches were
observed at a current of 0.2 mA. A test dose of 3 cc
Lidocaine 1~ injected through the needle resulted in
cessation of the twitch response.' To confirm that
~ adequate nerve blockade had been performed, the current
of the nerve stimulator was once again increased to
2 mA by stepping on the foot pedal. When no response
CA 02229391 1998-02-12
WO 96/32156 PCT/US96/04900
-16-
was observed at 2 mA, the rest of the anesthetic was
then injected. Using the foot pedal to control the
output of the nerve stimulator enabled the
anesthesiologist to perform, unassisted,. a safe and
efficacious nerve blockade procedure.
The introduction of the foot pedal 44 allows the
apparatus 10 of the invention to function in a more
precise manner than earlier PNS models, and provides
for more accurate current control, with an infinite
number of ranges (0.1 to 10 mA).. The amperage ranges
were verified through use of an amperometer serially
connected in line with the circuit. Thus, the desired
nerve N can be effectively located while providing a
maximum level of comfort for the patient.
It is to be understood that the foregoing is
considered as illustrative only of the principles of
the invention. Therefore, within the scope of the
appended claims, the invention may be practiced
otherwise than as specifically described herein.
