Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
CA 02237728 1998-06-02
W O 97/24416 PCTrUS96/19734
SULFURIZED OLEFIN COMPOSlTfON AND
ITS MFTHOD OF PRFPARATION
R~CKGROUND OF THF INVENTION
This invention relates to a purified sulfurized olefin
composition having low levels of thiones and to the m~lhod of its
0 ~ure,~rd~ion.
Sulfurization of an olefin (i.e., CGIlid~;lil 19 sulfur with an olefin)
may produce impurities, inctuding darkly colo,~d by-products which are
generally highly corrosive to copper. For exd",~,~le. sulfurization of
isobutylene by direct reaction with sulfurforms a sulfurized isobutylene
comrosition containing thione components, including 4-methyl-3H-1,2-
dithiole-3-thione ("MD I 1 '). For many end uses, these by-products are
undesirable t~ec~l~se of their copper cor,~sivity and the dark color they
impart. Reducing the conce-,L.dlici,- of these darkly ~.,lcrt:d components
20 usually reduces the co~per cor, usiveness. Accor~i"yly~ a method of
~ e~udril l9 sulfurized olefins that " ,;. .i. . .i,es the ru, l l IdLiOll of and/or
decreases the presence of thiones without adversely drr~ y corrosivity
is desirable.
Various methods have been suggested for preparing
sulfurized olefins. For example, one method is described in U. S. Patent
No. 4,204,969 wherein a sulfurized olefin additive for i~lblic~Liny oils is
obtail .ed by reacting sulfur monochloride with an aliphatic monoolefin to
form an ~ ct. reacting the adduct with sulfur and sodium sulfide in an
aqueous alkanol medium, and recovering the product by conve~,liol.al
lhcjds, e.g., removing alkanol, water washing, and filtering. This
method avoids the necessity of further ll~dllllenl with an aqueous c~t~ic
In the example p,~ser,led, the pdlt:"lee ~lisclQses first e~ d~ y a product
with water to remove salts, separating the ~l"eous layer, and then
extracting the ,~,,,ainil,y organic phase with water and hexane to further
remove water soluble impurities, such as any remaining salts. The
hexane is then riistiiled from the orydllic phase leaving the organic phase
intact, which is then filtered to obtain a sulfurized olefin. However, U. S.
--~.3l~, 1t 4i204,~9~69 dpes not disclose that the hexane-containing organic
- CA 02237728 1998-06-02
l~y~r c~n i~ treated fcr th~ rern~v~i cf thicnes. Fu~ qrmora, if ~i
suifuri:zed olefin ~ntaining thi~ es wer~ extr~t~d ~.Yi~ water as descr~ed
n ~J.S. Fatent ~o. 4,2~~ 9, the ~hiones ~v~utd rem~in with the c~rgani~
layer
Anoth~r rn~ehod ~s de~ri~e~ in PC i tU$~1JQ~ which
dis~,loses ~ hatc~ n-~ extr~me-~res5ur~ ~ntiwear ~dcii~iv~ o~aine~ ~y
r~cting ~ulfur, an ci~ec;us soi~tion o~ an ~ i m~t~i c~ f hyd~os~Jri~e
~r an ~Ik~iine ear~h met2i salt of hydrcs~lf~ie Gr mixtures c:r an alkali me~al
s~t~ dnd ~n alkal,n~ ~rth metal cait o~ hyd~osu~ e, ~nd ~ne ~r m~re
clefin;,. ~i~e r~ ior~ prcduct ob.atr7cd contains il+tl~ ~r r~o dithiol-thione.
In ~n ex~n~p!e~ the p~tent~s ~isci~s~ ~cantin~ ~nd Flitering the ~rgan~c
procuct from the ~queo~s by-pro~l~ot a~.cr th~ r~co~30n and state thc t
~dd~ti~n;~; erg~ric prod~:c~ m~ b~? r~coYereci ~f ~?~r~ctirlg t~e aqueous
1~ ~y-,~rod~Jct with ~everal pcr~ions 3~ hexanr. ~m~ininç tl ,~ e~ract.
~01io,4~d ~y ~vapor~tin~a ~ht hexan~. Ti~ cxtraction ~f ~he ~y-trod~ct is
cond~ d in an cq~e~us en~ircnn~e, It for the p~lfpose of rec~ering
a~dit~ al re~csion prodE~c~, n~t to reduc~ the le~J~I of t~,ion~ in th~
prGdLJCt.
o
~ YeEthe~ of the ~cve m~h~s ~ug~sts ~nt~çi~nl3 a
hyciro~ar~crl with a sui,~ri~~d oi~fin Co~E~sitio.~ !n a r on-ac;ueous
m~Gium. ~heref~. ~, in ~ntr~cl to the methoci~ descrike~E in U. S. Patent
~lo 4 ~04,~9 ana P~TJl;S~1/Q5~,8g, disp~al of aque~,~s sodium sllifi~e
25 or ~3C;UeCE~',S eElloride, whioh presents ~nvironmental conc~rns, -ES aot
~e~uk~d ac~,r~in~E tG th~ present in~ent3~" In a~dition, an aqucGus
extra~lon accordin~ to ~ithQr of th~ m~thc~s disciasec in ~hes~
pubiic~ticns ~12y recover ~ditional su]furi7~d ole,fin rather ~h~n pre~ipit~te
thicne wmponents in order to p~Jrify ~I-,e sulfurized o1efin prc~ciuced.
WO-A-92J~3~7 discloses ~ prooess ~or obtaini~g a
su~lurize~ oletin ~avincE a low dithiothicn~ c;~ntent in which su~f~r is react~ci
with an alkali suifid~ metal hy~rat~ in a high pressure r~2ctar prior t~
introducin~ an olefin. The sulfurized olefin is rec~vsr~d ~y remo~,in~
35 v~latiles, coolin~ to room temperature, ~nt~cting with m,~thyiene ~hloride,
fllterin~, washi~g ~fith wat~r and ~ryin~ T'nis procf3ss also ~ r~uir~ lhs
disp~sal of aqueous sociium suifide.
,
AMENDED ShiEE~
- CA 02237728 1998-06-02
- 2a -
T~is invPntion pro~id~s ~ solution to th~ problerr.s
~n~untere~ in praduc,rlg suffuri~ed olefirl ccmpositicns c~.ltaining
tl~ es. ~oncurTentiy, this in~en~ion ell~in3te~ enviror~mental csno2rns
a~cut th~ dispo~al of t~xic ~q~seaus sotuticns g~ner~ed in an ac;~o~Js
5 m~diu~.
~MEN2Ea ~ItEE~
CA 02237728 1998-06-02
W O 97/24416 3 PCTrUS96/19734
SUMMA~Y OF THF INV~NTION
This invention relates to a process for preparing a sulfurized
olefin containing low levels of thiones, which comprises:
(a) contacting sulfur with at least one olefin to form a
sulfurized olefin composition,
(b) removing at least a rnajor amount of unreacted olefin
from the sulfurized olefin composition formed in (a),
(c) contacting the suifurized olefin composition from (b~
1~ with a low molecular weight hydrocarbon to precipitate at least a major
amount of the thione components,
(d) removing the precipitated thione components from the
product formed in ~c), and
(e) recovering the sulfurized olefin from the low molecular
weight hydrocarbon.
In another embodiment, this invention relates to a purified
sulfurized olefin as well as the specific sulfurized olefin produced by the
process previously described.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF TltE INVENTION
The first step of the process of this invention is olefin
sulfu~ lion. Essentially any appropriate sulfurization method can be
used. For example, sulfurization of an olefin can be accomplished by
directly combining sulfur with at least one olefin under temperature and
pressure conditions suitable for forming the desired end product.
Sulfurization of an olefin can also be accomplished by treating an olefin
with sulfur and hydrogen sulfide. Preferably, sulfur is reacted directly with
isobutylene to form sulfurized isobutylene. In this instance, the
isobutylene is preferably added to the sulfur at a rate which controls the
exothermic reaction and which maintains the pressure within the range
discussed below.
Suitable olefins include alkenes such as propylene, isobutylene,
and diisobutylene; terpenes such as alpha-pinene; Diels-Alder adducts
such as bicycloheptene; fats such as lard; poly alpha-olefins such as poly-
' ' - CA 02237728 1998-06-02
1-dec~n3; ~nd uns~urate~' fatty a~i~s su~h as oleii~ a~id. T~e clefin
preferabiy is a C~ to C~ oiefln! mcr2 preferably ~ (~3 to C;~ o!~.in. Mos2
pre~erably"~4~utyl~ne is ;13ed. A sin~le olefin or a mixture of mere th~n
one ~yp~ ot oi~fin csn aiso ~ us~
If a mixture of cfefins is used, ~refi~ably the mixture c~m~rls2s a
mono~i~n in c~mbin~tl~n with ~ dic!ef;n or poly-~le~in. i~or ex3m~Je,
iscbutyie~e an~ l~ut~~ien~ or d~de~r,e and ~thylidene-2~or~ornene c~n
be u~ in oombin~tlcin. Tr;e avera~u~ csr~n numb~t of ~he ol~n mix~r~
~0 is pr~er~bly ~ithin t~e ra.~l~e of ~ to 12 in or~er ~o maxir~ize solu~i?i~ and
maintain a suiLbl~ pressur~, as ~esc!ib~i below, ~uring th~? rnacticn of
olef,n and ~lfur and t3 proYl~e a suli ;riz~ olefin ~ith ~OGd ~pper
corrcsi~ity, e.g.! a rating of 2A or ~ett2r in t.'n~ AST~1 G130 test ~or ~
.~Grmuiak~ lubricc,nt uslng 0.1 tv 3~,'0 su,Pur wlth Gr with~ut additional
15 c~per passiva~ors, ~.~., toiyl tri3z~le thi~di~~l~, 3nd pnOspr~it~s
In a mix~ur~ ~f r~onGol~fin ~nc di~le~in Of poiyole~in, th~ ~1er fa'ls
of m~cclafin to diolefin or palyole~in depend.c cn the reacti~ y cln~
nurni~e~ o~ dc~ oncs in ~he olefin mon~mers sele~ed. For exam~le, If
2ù i~ob~;tyl~ne an~ ~ut~cie~;e 3r~ sPd. the mslar r~io of isc~u;yl~ne ~o
buta~iene pre,er~bly ~s in tt~e r~n~e c~ ~b~ut 53 1 ,~ ~:1. If d~decPr.e an.i
ethyii~ene-~-norbornene are use~, the mcl~. ratio of ~o~ n~ to
e,~yli~ene-~-norbornene preferably i~ about 20:1 t~ 0.3: ~ The avera~
sulfur chairt l~ngth in the sui4~ri~ olefin ,c~~pared fr~m a rnixt~re of
2~ olefins is pre~era~ly ~bcut 1 t~ abo~Jt 3.
- Whcn a mixture o~ mon~ol~fin an~ diolefin cr polyclefin is
used, t~e mQnoole~in can be combir;ed w,th s~slfur anc~ then, prior t~
c~mp!e~ion of th~ r~.aclion ~i.e., wh~n about 2 to aba~t r~~/3 by weight,
,~ ba~eci on the to~l waight Qf th~ re~ ts, of u~reactPd monco~efin
r~mains) the diolefin cr polyole~n c~n b~ 2~d~2d. Alternati~eiy, if the
di~lefin ~r pCIyOlelini5 not too r*ac~lvs (i.e., the re~ctiorl ba~ n the
~ioieFin ~r pClyc'eJin ~nd ~ulfur coe~ not auto natioaily go to completion~,
th~ diclefin or pol~oleffn can ~e com~ned with SU~Uf and then, prlor ~o
35 compleii~n o~ th~3 re~cti~n, i.~., when ~bcut 2 to abaut 50% ~y we!ght,
5ase~ on the total weis~t of ~he r~a~.ants, of unreacte~ diotefin or
poiyolefin rer~ains, the monc~iefin ~in be ~dded. Preferably, ;he
~, ; . . .
T~ L Pliue . "~ .r~ ~
CA 02237728 l998-06-02
W O 97/24416 5 PCTnUS96/19734
monoolefin and diolefin or polyolefin are first combined together and then
combined with sulfur.
After sulfurization, at least a major amount, preferable at
5 least 75 wt. %, and more preferably substantially ail unreacted olefin is
removed, e.g., by stripping. The phrase "subslanliaily all unreacted olefin"
means either all unreacted olefin or all unreacted olefin with the exce~lion
of an amount of unreacted olefin which would not (i) result in a sulfurized
olefin composition having a flash point which is too low, e.g., 1 00~C or
0 less, and~or (ii) cause the sulfurized composition to have an affinity for the thiones contained therein.
For the purpose of illustration in the following description,
reference is made to the preferred sulfurization method where elemental
5 sulfur is reacted directly with isobutylene.
The sulfur content of the sulfurized olefin composition can
range from about 40 to about 55 weight %, based on the total weight of
the sulfurized olefin composition. In other words, the molar ratio of sulfur
to isobutylene in a direct reaction of eiemental sulfur and isobutylene can
range from about 1.17 to about 2.13. A sulfurized iso~utylene with a
higher sulfur content is generaily preferable because higher sulfur
products tend to have better extreme pressure properties---therefore, less
product is needed in the finished oil. However, the higher the sulfur
25 content of the sulfurized isobutylene, the greater the copper corrosivity.
Thus, to maximize sulfur content, minimize corrosiveness, and maximize
product yield, the more p~e~er,l:d amount of sulfur in the sulfurized olefin
composition is 43 to 47 weight %, and the preferred range for the sulfur to
isobutylene molar ratio is 1.32 to 1.55.
- If desired, a catalyst may be used for the preparation of the
sulfurized isobutylene. Suitable catalysts include, for example,
phosphines such as tributylphosphines and amines such as tributylamine
and polyisobutylene succinic anhydride polyamine dispersants.
The temperature during direct sulfurization of isobutylene
generaily ranges from about 120 to 180~C, preferabiy 140 to 180~C, more
CA 02237728 1998-06-02
W O 97/24416 6 PCTrUS96/19734
preferably 160 to 165~C. The particular temperature range is chosen in
order to maximize the rate of the reaction while maintaining the amount of
thione formation to below about 15 weight %, based on the weight of the
sulfurized isobutylene.
A suitable pressure is one which makes the exothermic
sulfurization reaction the easiest to control. For example, the pressure
can be maintained within a range of from 150 to 1000 psig, preferably
from 150 to 300 psig, and more preferably from 150 to 200 psig.
To minimize the initial conce"l,~lio" of the thiones,
isobutylene is preferably added to molten sulfur at a temperature ranging
from 160 to 165~C, preferably at a rate which controls the exothermic
reaction and maintains the desired pressure. For example, in a five gallon
autoclave containing about 8.3 kg of sulfur, a rate of about 5 to 25
grams/minute may be used. After the required amount of isobutylene has
been added, the reaction is allowed to continue until the autogeneous
pressure falls below a~out 75 psig. The autogeneous pressure generaily
falls to below about 75 psig after s' ~hst:~ntially all of the isobutylene has
20 been reacted with the sulfur.
As noted above, after the sulfurization step is completed, it is
preferred to remove the unreacted isobutylene, e.g., by stripping.
Stripping can be accomplished by cooling the product to a temperature
25 typically from 100~ - 110~C (e.g. about 1 04~C ) and purging with nitrogen
until the produd has a flash point of at least 1 00~C.
The thione content of the sulfurized olefin composition can
then be calculated by using a UVNIS spectrophotometer to measure the
30 light absorption of the sulfurized olefin samples. The calculation of the
thione content uses the extinction coefficient disrlosed in Mayer et al., J.
Chromatog., 15, 153-167, (1964) for pure MDTT. The measurement
captures thiones having an absorption at 415 nm in addition to MDTT.
There~ore, the content (i.e., conce"l,a~ion) encompassing MDTT and
35 these other thiones will be expressed throughout as "weight % MDrr
equivalents."
CA 02237728 1998-06-02
W O 97/24416 7 PCT~US96/19734
Although a preferred method is described for the preparation
of a sulfurized olefin, this invention is not limited to this preparation.
Sulfurized olefin compositions prepared by convenient methods other than
the direct reaction of elementai sulfur with isobutylene can also be used.
The next step of the process of this invention involves
contacting the sulfurized olefin composition thus prepared with a
hydrocarbon to precipitate at least a major portion, preferably at least
75 wt. %, of the thione components from the sulfurized olefin composition.
0 Removal of precipitated thiones can also be effected by any convenient
method, e.g., by decantation or filtration. The purified sulfurized olefin
containing low levels of thione components can then be recovered after
removing the hydrocarbon, e.g., by stripping. If desired, the hydrocarbon
may be reused.
Suitable hydrocarbons have a low molecular weight, e.g.,
about 16 to about 170. Preferably, the hydrocarbon has a carbon number
ranging from 1 to 12, more preferably from 2 to 5, and especially from 3 to
5. Propane is most preferred due to ease of handling in the liquid state
20 and ease of removal from the sulfurized olefin composition, but pentane is
also particularly effective. Hydrocarbons having a molecuiar weight that
is too high, i.e., hydrocarbons having a carbon number above about 12,
may be difficult to remove from the supernatant liquid after the precipitated
thiones have been removed.
The low molecular weight hydrocarbon is preferably
saturated. Although, unsaturated hydrocarbons and aromatics can be
used, they are not preferred since thiones usually have a higher solubility
in an unsaturated or aromatic medium. Linear and branched
30 hydrocarbons are preferred,, with linear hydrocarbons being most
- preferred.
The volume ratio of hydrocarbon to sulfurized olefin
preferably ranges from about 0.5:1 to 10:1, more preferably from 1:1 to
3~ 5:1, and most preferably from 1:1 to 3:1.
CA 02237728 1998-06-02
W O97/24416 8 PCT~US96tl9734
The temperature during the contact of hydrocarbon with the
sulfurized olefin composition can range from about -200 to about 1 50~C,
preferably from -70 to 1 0~C, more preferabiy from ~0 to 0~C. Contacting
temperatures can be seiected within these ranges by choosing a
temperature at which the thiones are less soluble in order to achieve a
more complete thione removal. Contacting temperatures can be achieved
by any convenient method, e.g., auto-refrigeration. Auto-refrigeration
evaporates some of the hydrocarbon, which in turn cools the solution by
removing the latent heat of evaporation. For example, the solution of
sulfurized olefin composition and low molecular weight hydrocarbon can
be auto-refrigerated or the hydrocarbon can be auto-refrigerated and then
contacted with the sulfurized olefin composition and additional auto-
refrigeration can be performed if necessary. The evaporated hydrocarbon
is usually condensed and may be recycled.
The sulfurized olefin composition is preferably contacted with
propane at a temperature ranging from about -80~ to about 25~C,
preferably from -80~ to 0~C, more preferably from -80~ to -35~C, which is
preferably achieved by auto-refrigeration. The sulfurized olefin
com~uosilion is also conveniently extracted with pentane at a temperature
ranging from about -80~ to about 25~C, prert :rably from -80~ to 0~C, more
preferably from -80~ to -3~~C. Extraction with the lower molecular weight
hyd~ucarL,on within these temperature ranges will result in excellent
removal of thiones.
If liquid hydrocarbons are used, the pressure during this step
is one sufFcient to maintain the hydrocarbon in the liquid state. For
example, if the hydrocarbon is propane, the pressure necess~ry to keep
propane as a liquid at ambient temperature can range from about 50 to
about 150 psig. At the normal boiling point of propane, i.e., 42.1~C,
the pressure required is about 0 psig (1 atmosphere). If auto-refrigeration
is used to produce a low temperature during contact of the hydrocarbon
with the sulfurized olefin composition, the pressure is reduced to
evaporate the hydrocarbon and then maintained at a level necessary to
keep the hydrocarbon as a liquid at that temperature.
CA 02237728 l998-06-02
W O 97/24416 PCTrUS96/19734
The pressure used for hydrocarbons in the gaseous state is
a vapor pressure above atmospheric, but depends on the particular
hydrocarbon and contactin~ temperature selected. For example, ethane
at 40~C will require an elevated pressure of 110 psig t7.5 atm).
Following contacting the low molecul~r weight hydrocarbon
with the sulfurized olefin composition, it is preferred to have a holding or a
settling period sufficient to o~tain a good separ~lion ---allow the MDTT to
crystalize and separate from solution. This period should be at least 1~
10 minutes, more preferably from 15 minutes to 2 hours. Prior to the settling
period, the sulfurized olefin/hydrocarbon solution is preferably agitated,
e.g., by gently stirring. The agitation can be performed for a period of from
1 hour to 8 hours, preferably from 1 hour to 2 hours.
At least a malor amount, preferably at least 70 wt. %,
typically from 50 to 98 wt. %, more preferably from 80 to 98 wt. %, of the
total thione content present in the sulfurized olefin composition is
precipitated. The precipitated thiones may then be separated from the
sulfurized olefin/hydrocarbon solution, e.g., by decar,ldlion or filtering.
The hydrocarbon is then removed from the sulfurized olefin/hydrocarbon
solution, e.g., by stripping, c~ist~ tion~ or evaporation, and a purified
sulfurized olefin containing low levels of thiones is recovered.
The steps of the process can be carried out in the same
25 vessel or in different vessels
This invention may be further understood from the following
examples which are not intended to restrict the scope of the appended
claims.
Example 1 - Peparation of Sulfurized Isobutylene
)
Two types of sulfurized isobutylene were prepared. The first
type (SIB A) had a sulfur content of 53.5 wt. % and a thione content of
13.7 wt. % as MDl~ ec~uivalents. The second type (SIB B) had a sulfur
content o~ 46.6 wt. % and a thione content of 10.8 wt. % as MDl~
=
CA 02237728 1998-06-02
W O 97/24416 PCTAUS96/19734
equivalents. Preparation of both types was similar and was conducted as
follows:
Sulfur was first added to an autoclave and then heated to a
temperature ranging from about 1~8 to 162~C before the isobutylene was
added. The target temperature for running the reaction was then set at
160 to 165~C. Throughout the preparation, the average pressure was
substantially below 200 psig. The peak pressure during the preparation of
S1~3 A was 215 psig, and the peak pressure during the preparation of SIB
0 B was 210 psig. The reactions were run for about 17-26 hours.
Example 2 - ~xtraction of Sulfurized Isobutylene ~Ith Low Molecular
Weight Hydrocarbons
A. Extraction With Liquid Hydrocarbons
SIB A was separately extracted with n-Pentane~ n-
hexane, and n-heptane 15 separate experiments. The runs were
conducted at a pressure of 0 psig (1 atm) and at a temperature of -78.5~C,
20 with the exception of Run No. 7, which was conducted at room
temperature (about 25~C). The amount of sulfurized isobutylene, the type
and amount of hydrocarbon, the ratio of hydrucarbon to sulfurized
isobutylene, the reaction time, and an analysis of the recovered product
are set forth in Table 1 below.
CA 02237728 1998-06-02
W O97/24416 11 PCT~US96/19734
Table 1
RunSl81 Hydrocarbon ~ Ratio~ Time Recovered Product4
No.(grams) (hours)
TypeGrams %Yield~/0 MDl~
equivalents
100.2 C5 50.5 0.50 2 -- 3.6
2 100.1 C5 100.3 1.00 2 79.2 2.1
3 100.1 C5 100.8 1.01 ~18 77.8 3.4
4 100.0 C5 200.4 2.00 2 73.1 1.1
10û.0 C5 300.1 3.00 2 78.8 1.2
6 100.0 C5 400.1 4.00 2 78.7 1.2
7 106.1 C5 500.6 4.72 2 101.2 10.25
8 100.2 C6 50.3 0.50 2 70.9 4.9
100.1 C6 100.3 1.00 2 77.9 3.2
100.0 C6 100.5 1.05 ~18 80.2 4.1
11 100.1 C6 202.3 2.02 2 80.7 1.8
12 100.0 C7 50.0 0.50 2 77.5 5.6
13 100.0 C7 100.2 1.00 2 80.0 3.2
14 100.0 C7 104.0 1.04 ~18 92.4 3.6
100.1 C7 200.8 2.01 2 80.5 1.8
1SIB (sulfurized isobutylene) having 53.5 wt. % sulfur and a thione content of 13.7 wt. %
as MDl~ equivalents.
~l Iyd,o- arLon refers to hyd,~. all,ons which are no"~ ly liquid at ambient conditions. C5
refers to n-Pentane. C6 refers to n-hexane and C7 refers to n-hePtane.
3Ratio refers to grams of hyd,~cd,l,on per gram of SIB.
4Removal of all traces of the C5 to C7 hyd, ucarLons is more difficult. Therefore
measured product yield may be slightly higher than actual yield.
5E~ueri,nenl run at room l~:"",er~lure.
In general, extraction with a C5 hydrocarbon removes more
5 thiones than extraction with a C6 or C7 hydrocarbon under the same
conditions. Also, higher ratios of hydrocarbon to SIB result in better
removal of thiones. This effect appears to plateau as the ratio increases.
For example, as shown in Table 1 for pentane, the percent of MDTT
equivalents levels out at about 1.1 to 1.2 % as the ratio of hydrocarbon to
~o SIB reaches about 2Ø
CA 02237728 1998-06-02
W O 97/24416 12 PCTrUS96119734
B. Extraction With Pentane
SIB B was extracted with pentane in 9 separate
5 experiments. The tests were conducted at a pressure of 0 psig (1 atm~
and a temperature ranging from about -18 to -19~C as indicated in Table
2. The runs were conducted in a manner similar to that described above.
In the first five runs (1 to 5), after the pentane and sulfurized isobutylene
were contacted, the mixture was altowed to settle for about two hours. In
10 the last four runs (6 to 9), the pentanelsulfurized isobutylene soiution was
agitated for one hour prior to a settling period of two hours at the
temperature of the cold bath, i.e., -18 to -19~C. The extractant layer was
then decanted, stripped of pentane, and analyzed for % MDl~
equivaients. The amount of sulfurized isobutylene, the volume-to-volume
15 ratio of pentane to sulfurized isobut,vlene, and an analysis of the extractant
are set forth in Table 2 below.
Table 2
Run Temp. SIB1 Pent~ne Ratio~ Fsllr.. l,lnt
No.(~C)(grams)
(grams) (ml) (grams)% Yield % MDl~
equivalents
-18 108.0 62.6 100 1.092.5 85.6 4.79
2 -19 108.0 125.4 200 2.097.0 89.8 3.45
3 -18 108.0 187.8 300 3.088.3 81.8 2.91
4 -18 108.0 250.8 401 4.094.0 87.0 3.33
5 -18 108.0 313.9 501 5.094.5 87.5 3.18
6 -18 108.0 125.8 201 2.086.0 79.6 2.93
7 -18 108.0 187.6 300 3.093.0 86.1 2.68
8 -18 108.2 250.9 401 4.092.3 85.3 2.73
9 -18 108.1 313.9 501 5.092.1 85.2 2.88
1SIB having 46.6 % sulfur and a thione content of 10.8 % as MDrr equivalents. The
volume of SIB used was 100 ml.
2Ratio refers to volume of hy.l.ucd,~un per volume of SIB.
As shown in Table 2, a preferred embodiment of this
invention is to extract with pentane at about -1 8~C using agitation for one
CA 02237728 1998-06-02
WO 97/24416 13 PCTrUS96/19734
hour prior to a two hour settling period. The additional hour of agitation
further lowers the amount of MDTT equivalents present in the extractant.
C. Extraction With Propane and Butane at - 78.5~C
SIB A was separately extracted with propane and Q-butane
in 8 individual runs. The runs were conducted at a temperature of -78.5~C
and a pressure of 0 psig (1 atm). The amount of sulfurized isobutylene,
the type and amount of hydrocarbon, the ratio of hydrocarbon to sulfurized
0 isobutylene, the reaction time, and the recovered product are set forth in
Table 3 below.
Table 3
RunSIBl Hyd,u~,dlL,on ~ Ratio~ Time Recovered Product
No.(grams) (hours)
TypeGrams %Yield% MDrr
equivalents
16 25.7 C3 43.5 1.69 2 70.0 1.0
17 25.1 C3 51.8 2.06 2 72.3 0.7
18 20.4 C3 59.2 2.90 2 75.8 0.7
19 15.3 C3 53.2 3.48 2 74.6 0.~
20 25.8 C4 44.0 1.71 1 77.~ 1.8
21 25.2 C4 51.6 2.05 1 72.2 1.3
~ 25.1 C4 57.6 2.29 2 -- 0.9
23 15.2 C4 48.7 3.20 2 75.7 0.6
1SIB having 63.~ wt. % sulfur and a thione content of 13.7 wt. % as MDTT equivalents.
2H~g~,uc~l~on refers to hy~l,..c~l~ons which are normally ~ceo~ls at ambient col,dili~lls.
C3 is propane and C4 is n-butane.
3Ratio refers to grams of hyc~ro~.d, I,on per gram of SIB.
Extraction with C3 and C4 hydrocarbons at dry ice
temperature, i.e.l -78.~C, as shown in Table 3, il1ustrates the preference
for lower mol~cular weight hydrocarbons. At the same extraction
20 conditions, a C3 hydrocarbon is generally better than a C4 hydrocarbon in
removing thiones. The results also illustrate that the higher the ratio of
hydrocarbon to SlB, the lower the concenlldlion of remaining thiones.
-
CA 02237728 1998-06-02
WO97/24416 14 PCT~US96/19734
D. i xtractlon With Propane at- 38~C
SIB A was extracted with propane in 3 separate runs, and
5 SIB B was extracted with propane in 7 separate runs. The runs were
conducted at a temperature of -38~C and a pressure of O psig (1 atm).
The type and amount of sulfurized isobuty~ene, the amount of propane,
the ratio of propane to sulfurized isobutylene, the reaction time, and the
recovered product are set forth in Table 4 below.
Table 4
Run SIB Propane Ratio~ Time Recovered Product~_
No.
Type3 Grams %Yieid% MDTT
equivalents
24 H 100.0 293 2.93 0.5872.2 1.06
25 H 100.3 293 2.92 0.4274.1 1.15
26 H 100.3 293 2.92 1.0073.9 1.23
27 L 101.8 500 4.92 t.4283.0 1.41
28 L 101~6 293 2.88 0.9283.0 1.46
29 L 266.0 585 2.20 1.25-- 1.91
L 268.1 585 2.18 1.17 79.2 1.68
31 L 269.2 ~85 2.17 1.25 78.2 1.70
32 L 269.7 585 2.17 1.2~ 80.~ 1.94
33 L 272.1 585 2.15 1.25 85.3 2.12
1 Ratio refers to grams of propane per ~ram o~ SIB.
2Fx~e,il"~.,ldliun revealed that propane i5 not difficult to remoYe. The,t~ , yield should
reflect only the purified product.
3i~ plt:Sellla Sl8 A; L ,~y":ser,ls SIB B.
CA 02237728 l998 - 06 - 02
WO 97/24416 PCTtUS96/19734
Propane extraction at the normal boiling point of about 40~C
is another embodiment of the present invention. The results of Run Nos.
27 to 33 illustrate that extraction of a SIB sample containing 46.6 wt. %
sulfur is more preferred than extraction of a SIB sample containing 53.5
wt. % since and even higher yield of recovered product is obtained at 46.6
wt. % sulfur.
_
