Language selection

Search

Patent 2239532 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2239532
(54) English Title: HIGH-RIGIDITY PANEL
(54) French Title: PANNEAU A HAUTE RIGIDITE
Status: Dead
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • E04C 2/36 (2006.01)
  • B60R 99/00 (2009.01)
  • B32B 3/12 (2006.01)
  • B32B 3/28 (2006.01)
  • B64C 1/00 (2006.01)
  • E04C 2/34 (2006.01)
  • E04F 13/12 (2006.01)
  • E04F 15/06 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • TAKAHASHI, MICHIYASU (Japan)
  • SAKODA, AKITO (Japan)
  • HIROSE, YOZO (Japan)
  • WATANABE, TOMOAKI (Japan)
  • YAMADA, KOICHI (Japan)
(73) Owners :
  • SUMITOMO METAL INDUSTRIES, LTD. (Japan)
(71) Applicants :
  • SUMITOMO METAL INDUSTRIES, LTD. (Japan)
(74) Agent: OSLER, HOSKIN & HARCOURT LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(22) Filed Date: 1998-06-01
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 1999-12-01
Examination requested: 1998-09-23
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data: None

Abstracts

English Abstract




A high-rigidity panel having a laminate structure of two or more panels
superimposed together, the panels each having a large number of convex
portions, the convex portions of each panel being each bonded to one or more
convex portions of another such panel. As the material of the panels it is
desirable to use steel as a steel plate or such a metallic material as
aluminum
or titanium. The high-rigidity panel of the invention, because of adoption of
such a laminate structure, can exhibit high strength and rigidity against a
load applied thereto, despite of lightweight. Thus, the high-rigidity panel of
the invention is most suitable for use as a floor or wall surface panel of
such a
structure as a building structure, an airplane, or a vehicle.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.



CLAIMS
1. A high-rigidity panel comprising a laminate structure of two or
more panels superimposed together, said panels each having a multitude of
convex portions, said convex portions of each said panel being each bonded to
one or more convex portions of another said panel.
2. A high-rigidity panel according to claim 1, wherein said panels are
each constituted by a steel plate.
3. A high-rigidity panel according to claim 1, wherein said panels are
each formed using a metallic material selected from aluminum and titanium.
4. A high-rigidity panel according to claim 1, wherein the concave
portions of said panels are formed by pressing.
5. A high-rigidity panel according to claim 1, for use as a floor or wall
surface panel of such a structure as a building structure, an airplane, or a
vehicle.
6. A high-rigidity panel comprising a laminate structure of two or
more panels superimposed together, said panels each having a multitude of
convex portions, said convex portions of each said panel being each bonded in
a
pair to one said convex portion of another said panel.
7. A high-rigidity panel according to claim 6, wherein said panels are
each constituted by a steel plate.
8. A high-rigidity panel according to claim 6, wherein said panels are
each formed using a metallic material selected from aluminum and titanium.
9. A high-rigidity panel according to claim 6, wherein the convex
portions of said panels are formed by pressing.
10. A high-rigidity panel according to claim 6, wherein the bonding
between said convex portions is performed by spot welding.
11. A high-rigidity panel according to claim 6, wherein said convex
11



portions bonded in a pair are not in alignment with each other.
12. A high-rigidity panel according to claim 6, for use as a floor or
wall surface panel of such a structure as a building structure, an airplane,
or a
vehicle.
12

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.



CA 02239532 1998-06-O1
HIGH-RIGIDITY PANEL
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a high-rigidity panel of lightweight
having a high rigidity to be applied to floor or wall surfaces of such
structures
as building structures, airplanes and vehicles.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PRIOR ART
Heretofore, as structures for use as panels of such structures as
building structures, airplanes and vehicles, those of a honeycomb structure
are
very popular. Metals are mainly used as a constituent material of a
honeycomb structure. The thickness of a metal used for the honeycomb
structure is very small, in the range of about 50 ,u m to about 100 ,u m.
However, since the honeycomb structure has the function of dispersing the
load applied thereto, the panel of the honeycomb structure has the feature
that
it is very strong despite of lightweight.
However, for fabricating a panel of such a honeycomb structure, it is
necessary to go through many manufacturing steps like ~1 adhesive
application ~ ~ plate cutting ~ ~3 laminating ~ ~ pressing -~ 5~
cutting. Besides, due to accumulation of losses in those manufacturing steps,
the waste of the structural material used becomes large. Furthermore, from
the standpoint of productivity, for example at the time of bonding a honeycomb
structural member and surface members to one another, so that the surface
members cover both sides of the honeycomb structural member, it is necessary
that these members after being cut be fixed at predetermined shape and size
during the bonding operation. But such a bonding operation is troublesome,
giving rise to the problem that the working afficiency is limited and that the
1


CA 02239532 1998-06-O1
productivity is deteriorated markedly.
For solving the above-mentioned problems involved in the panel of the
honeycomb structure, a metallic panel of lightweight having a strength high
enough for use as a structure wall panel and superior in productivity is
proposed in Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open (kokai) No. 6-316015.
FIG.l is a partially cut-away view in perspective of the metallic panel,
proposed in the above patent application. This metallic panel, indicated at 7,
comprises a structural member 9 with a large number of convex portions 8
formed thereon and surface members 10 bonded to both sides of the structural
member 9. In an intermediate layer 11 of the metallic panel are formed a
large number of independent cellular portions 12 and continuous spatial
portions 13. Since this metallic panel has a large number of cellular portions
in its intermediate layer, it is possible to disperse an applied load as is
the case
with a panel of the honeycomb structure, and hence the metallic panel can
exhibit a high strength against the applied load. In panel manufacture,
moreover, it is possible to adopt a simple process comprising the steps of
subjecting a thin metallic material, such as aluminum to deep drawing or
bulging to form a large number of convex portions, and subsequently bonding a
surface material to both sides of the thus processed metallic material. For
the
proposed metallic panel, however, no consideration is given to its rigidity
against flexural deformations. Thus, the metallic panel in question involves
the problem that it is markedly deficient in rigidity
FIGS.2 and 3 show how the above metallic panel is deformed under the
application of a load, of which FIG.2 shows a deformed state of the panel
under
the application of a distributed load p in a stable state of the whole
underside
of the panel being supported, and FIG.3 shows a deformed state of the panel
under the application of the distributed load p in a both end-supported state
of
2


CA 02239532 1998-06-O1
only end portions of the panel underside being supported.
As shown in FIG.2, when the distributed load p is applied to the
metallic panel in a stable state of the panel underside, the panel can exhibit
a
high strength. However, as shown in FIG.3, in a both end-supported state of
the panel in which only both end portions of the panel underside are
supported,
the panel is subjected to bending due to the distributed load p. In this case,
since the metallic panel is provided with the convex portions 8 in a separated
manner at predetermined constant intervals, the portions of the surface
members 10 supported by the convex portions 8 are not deformed, whereas the
surface member portions located between adjacent convex portions 8 and not
supported by the convex portions are apt to be deformed. Once deformations
occur at portions of the surface member 10, the panel as a whole easily
undergo flexural deformations, thus giving rise to the problem that the
rigidity
of the panel is insufficient as a structural product.
OBJECT OF THE INVENTION
For panels to be used as floor or wall surface panels of such structures
as building structures, airplanes and vehicles, it is required to exhibit a
high
rigidity as a structural product so as not to cause flexural deformations
irrespective of how the panels are supported and no matter in what state a
load may be applied to the panels, in addition to the requirement that the
panels should be lightweight.
Taking note of the improvement of rigidity out of the performances
required for floor or wall surface panels of a structure, in order to prevent
flexural deformations of the panels, the present invention intends to provide
a
panel having a high rigidity
3


CA 02239532 1998-06-O1
SI:f~IARY OF THE INVENTION
Having made various studies about the rigidity of panels, the present
inventors made it clear that in the both end-supported state of the foregoing
conventional metallic panel with only end portions of the panel underside
being supported, the surface member portions located between adjacent convex
portions and not supported by the convex portions are easily subjected to
flexural deformations, and that the rigidity of the panel as a whole is
deteriorated markedly Having made further studies, the present inventors
found out a panel structure in which flexural deformations are diminished
even when a load is applied to the panel in the both end-supported state of
only both ends of the panel underside being supported. In this way we
completed the high-rigidity panel of the present invention.
The gist of the present invention resides in the following panel, an
example of which is shown in FIG.4 to be referred to later: "a high-rigidity
panel having a laminated structure in which two or more panels each having a
large number of convex portions are superimposed together, with the convex
portions of each panel being bonded to one or more convex portions of the
other
panel adjacent thereto."
The "laminated structure" as referred to herein, means a laminated
panel structure in which panels each having a large number of convex portions
are bonded together through the respective convex portions. The material of
the panel according to the present invention is not specially limited. Not
only
steel but also aluminum (Al) and titanium (Ti) are also employable.
Aluminum and titanium not only ensure the required strength of the panel,
but also are more advantageous to the reduction in weight of the panel.
Further, the use of the panel according to the present invention, is not
limited
to floor or wall surfaces of building structures. The panel of the present
4


CA 02239532 1998-06-O1
invention is also applicable to airplanes and vehicles.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG.1 is a partially cut-away view in perspective of an example of a
conventional metallic panel;
FIG.2 shows a deformed state of the conventional metallic panel under
the application of a distributed load to the panel in a stable state of the
whole
panel underside being supported;
FIG.3 shows a deformed state of the conventional metallic panel under
the application of a distributed load to the panel in a both end-supported
state
of only both end portions of the panel underside being supported;
FIG.4 is a partially cut-away view in perspective of a construction
example of a high-rigidity panel according to the present invention;
FIG.5 shows a flat top of each convex portion formed on each of
constituent panels of the high-rigidity panel according to the present
invention; and
FIG.6 shows a flat top, with an aperture formed therein, of each convex
portion formed on each of constituent panels of the high-rigidity panel
according to the present invention.
DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
As mentioned above, the reason why the conventional metallic panel is
deficient in rigidity, is that flexural deformations occur at the surface
member
portions located between adjacent convex portions and not supported by
convex portions. This is because generally the convex portions exhibit a high
resistance to deformations, whereas the surface members are low in their
resistance to deformations. In other words, if such deformations of the


CA 02239532 1998-06-O1
surface members can be suppressed, it is possible to obtain a panel having a
high-rigidity. This condition can be satisfied, if the convex portions of each
constituent panel are bonded not only to the associated surface member, but
also to the convex portions of another constituent panel. Therefore, if the
convex portions that exhibit a high resistance to deformations of the panels,
are bonded together, it is possible to suppress deformations under the
application of a load to the panels, resulting in that the laminated panel as
a
whole can exhibit a high-rigidity.
FIG.4 is a perspective view with parts partially cut-away to show an
example of construction of a high-rigidity panel according to the present
invention. The high-rigidity panel of the present invention, indicated at 1,
is
of a laminated structure (a laminated panel) comprising two or more panels 3
superimposed together and each having a large number of convex portions 2.
The panels 3 are bonded together through the respective convex portions 2 to
constitute a panel laminate 5, and one or both sides of the panel laminate 5
are
covered with surface members 4. In this case, the convex portions 2 of each
panel 3 are bonded to the convex portions 2 of another panel 3. Therefore,
even when a load is applied to the laminated panel in a both end-supported
state of only both ends of the panel underside being supported, panel
deformations are small and a high-rigidity is ensured as the entire panel
structure.
The number of another convex portion to which a specific convex
portion is bonded may be at least one. For example, assuming that the panel
laminate of the present invention is constituted by two panels A and B, the
convex portions of panel A may be bonded respectively to the convex portions
of
panel B in 1:1 relation, or each of the convex portions of panel A may be
bonded to two or more convex portions of panel B and, also when viewed from
6


CA 02239532 1998-06-O1
the panel B side, each of its convex portions may be bonded to two or more
convex portions of panel A. The larger number of convex portions of panel B
to which one convex portion of panel A, the more dispersed is the load applied
to the A-B panel laminate, so that the resistance to deformation increases and
the rigidity of the entire panel structure is enhanced.
FIGS.5 and 6 are perspective views showing examples of convex shapes
in the panel laminate of the present invention, with no special limitation
being
imposed on the shape of convex portion. Usually, each convex portion
assumes an inverted bowl shape, as shown in FIGS, the upper end of which is
preferably flat to enhance the effective bonding with another convex portion
or
a surface member. The size and shape of each convex portion may be
determined according to the place where the panel structure is to be used, the
purpose of use, etc. As shown in FIG.6, the flat top of the convex portion may
partially be formed with an aperture for facilitating a molding operation.
Even in this case, there is no fear of deterioration in strength or rigidity
of the
resulting panel laminate for use, as a floor or wall surface panel in such a
structure as a building structure, an airplane, or a vehicle.
The number of constituent panels of the panel laminate according to
the present invention, is usually two. However, even where the number of
constituent panels is three, for example, A, B and C, if convex portions are
formed on one sides of panels A and B, and convex portions are formed on both
sides of panel C, and if panels A and B are disposed so that their convex
portions are opposed to each other, with panel C being sandwiched in between
both panels A and B, the convex portions of panel A are bonded to the convex
portions formed on one side of panel C, and at the same time the convex
portions of panel B are bonded to the convex portions formed on the other side
of panel C. Thus, the number of constituent panels may be three. By
7


CA 02239532 1998-06-O1
increasing the number of constituent panels, it becomes possible to thicken
the
resulting panel laminate. Besides, not only the dimensional range as a
structural material can be widened, but also it is possible to expect the
improvement of rigidity and of heat insulating property
As described above, the panel laminate of the present invention has a
surface member or members, e.g. particle board, on one or both sides thereof.
Like a panel of the honeycomb structure, the panel structure of the present
invention exhibits the function of dispersing a load applied thereto. Besides,
the panel laminate of the present invention is high in strength, and the
convex
portions of the constituent panels are bonded together, so it is little
deformed
and exhibits a high-rigidity as a whole.
As to the material of the high-rigidity panel of the present invention,
there is no special limitation. In the case of using steel, there is adopted
any
of steel plates, various plated steel plates and pre-coated steel plates. As
noted previously, other metallic materials may be used such as, for example,
aluminum and titanium or various resins may be used. The use of aluminum
or titanium not only contributes to the enhancement of rigidity, but also is
more advantageous to the reduction in weight of the resulting panel.
For fabricating the high-rigidity panel of the present invention, if a
metal is used as the material of the panel, the metal is usually as thin as
100
to 1200,um and is subjected to deep drawing or pressing to form convex
portions at predetermined positions, then, for example, two of the panels thus
formed are bonded together through the respective convex portions to afford a
panel laminate. Next, a surface member or members are applied to one or
both sides of the panel laminate. In the case of using a resin as the material
of the panel, it becomes possible to attain a further reduction of weight and
facilitate molding, in comparison with the use of a metal.
8


CA 02239532 1998-06-O1
The bonding between convex portions may be in a relation of 1:1 or
even in a relation of 1:2 or more. In 1:1 bonding, both convex portions may be
aligned exactly with each other or may be somewhat deviated from each other.
By such "off center" of convex portions the deformation suppressing effect is
enhanced and hence there is attained a further improvement of rigidity In
the case of 1:2 or more bonding, the bonded convex portions are off center
with
respect to each other as a matter of course.
The bonding between convex portions may be done by an adhesive
bonding using, for example, urethane resin or epoxy resin, or may be done by
welding, such as spot welding. In the case of an adhesive bonding or a
combination of adhesive bonding and welding, the resulting panel laminate is
superior in its impulsive sound absorbing performance, in comparison with the
case where only welding does the bonding.
As to the bonding of surface members to the upper and lower surfaces
of the panel laminate, it may be done by adhesive bonding or using machine
screws.
The above processing comprises relatively simple steps that are
repeated. Besides, the processing can be done continuously from a long
material, which is in a wound-up state. Thus, the processing in question is
also superior in productivity.
EXAMPLES
The high-rigidity panel 1 of the present invention, shown in FIG.4, was
fabricated. As each panel 3 there was used a cold-rolled steel plate
(thickness: 600 ,u m), which was pressed to form convex portions (bottom
diameter: 250 mm, height: 45 mm) of such a shape as shown in FIGS, so as to
give a center-to-center distance of 350 mm between the bottoms of adjacent
9


CA 02239532 1998-06-O1
convex portions 2. Thereafter, two such panels 3 were laminated together to
form a panel laminate 5, and surface members (particle boards) were axed
respectively to the upper and lower surfaces of the panel laminate 5 to afford
the high-rigidity panel 1. Bonding between convex portions 2 was done by
spot welding, and the a~xation of the surface members 4 to the upper and
lower surfaces of the panel laminate was done using machine screws. In the
panel laminate of panels 3, the convex portions 2 of the lower panel 3 are in
1:1
correspondence to the convex portions 2 of the upper panel 3, but the convex
portions 2 are somewhat off centered with respect to one another.
The high-rigidity panel thus fabricated according to the present
invention was checked for rigidity under the application of various loads
(e.g.
distributed load and local load). As a result, it turned out that panel of the
present invention exhibited a high-rigidity as a whole, with suppressed
flexural deformations, even in such a both end-supported state, as shown in
FIG.3, in which only end portions of the panel underside were supported.
Thus, the high-rigidity panel of the invention is superior in both strength
and
rigidity and is lightweight, thus is suitable for use as a floor or wall
surface
panel of a structure for example.

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date Unavailable
(22) Filed 1998-06-01
Examination Requested 1998-09-23
(41) Open to Public Inspection 1999-12-01
Dead Application 2002-04-02

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2001-03-29 R30(2) - Failure to Respond
2001-06-01 FAILURE TO PAY APPLICATION MAINTENANCE FEE

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 1998-06-01
Application Fee $300.00 1998-06-01
Request for Examination $400.00 1998-09-23
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 2 2000-06-01 $100.00 2000-05-31
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
SUMITOMO METAL INDUSTRIES, LTD.
Past Owners on Record
HIROSE, YOZO
SAKODA, AKITO
TAKAHASHI, MICHIYASU
WATANABE, TOMOAKI
YAMADA, KOICHI
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Representative Drawing 1999-11-19 1 10
Abstract 1998-06-01 1 21
Cover Page 1999-11-19 1 38
Description 1998-06-01 10 461
Claims 1998-06-01 2 50
Drawings 1998-06-01 2 39
Assignment 1998-06-01 3 135
Prosecution-Amendment 1998-09-23 1 29
Prosecution-Amendment 2000-09-29 2 51
Fees 2000-05-31 1 44