Language selection

Search

Patent 2242672 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2242672
(54) English Title: RAPID-FOAMING FOAM FOR PREFABRICATED SYSTEM BUILDING
(54) French Title: PRODUIT MOUSSANT RAPIDEMENT POUR LA CONSTRUCTION DE SYSTEMES PREFABRIQUES
Status: Dead
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C08G 18/16 (2006.01)
  • C08G 18/09 (2006.01)
  • C08J 9/14 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • VON SCHOLTEN, BENT (Denmark)
  • HOLMSKOV, INGE (Denmark)
  • KINDT-LARSEN, TURE (Denmark)
  • KAABER, HENNING (Denmark)
  • LARSEN, HANS OLE (Denmark)
(73) Owners :
  • RATHOR AG (Switzerland)
(71) Applicants :
  • RATHOR AG (Switzerland)
(74) Agent: FETHERSTONHAUGH & CO.
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(86) PCT Filing Date: 1996-11-29
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 1997-06-12
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/EP1996/005283
(87) International Publication Number: WO1997/020876
(85) National Entry: 1998-07-09

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
1362/95 Denmark 1995-12-01
0550/96 Denmark 1996-05-07

Abstracts

English Abstract




The invention concerns a two-component system for producing polyurethane
foams, the system comprising a polyol component A with at least one polyol
having a functionality of two or more, water and a catalyst system comprising
at least two catalysts, of which at least one can catalyze the reaction of the
polyisocyanate with the polyol and/or water and at least one further catalyst
can catalyze the trimerization of isocyanate groups. The system further
comprises a polyisocyanate component B having at least one polyisocyanate with
a functionality 2, the ratio between NCO groups in component B and OH groups
in component A being > 1.


French Abstract

L'invention concerne un système à deux composants pour la production de mousse polyuréthane, comprenant un composant polyol A contenant au moins un polyol d'une fonctionnalité d'au moins deux, de l'eau et un système catalyseur contenant au moins deux catalyseurs, un au moins de ces catalyseurs pouvant catalyser la réaction du polyisocyanate avec le polyol et/ou l'eau, et au moins un autre catalyseur pouvant catalyser la trimérisation de groupes isocyanate. Le système comporte également un composant polyisocyanate B contenant au moins un polyisocyanate d'une fonctionnalité ? 2, le rapport des groupes NCO du composant B aux groupes OH du composant A étant ? 1.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.




Claims

1. Pressureless two-component cartridge system for producing
polyurethane foams consisting of a polyol component A with at least one
polyol with a functionality of 2 or more, water and a catalyst system
comprising at least two catalysts at least one of which is able to catalyze the
reaction of polyisocyanate with polyol and/or water, and at least one further
one of which is able to catalyze the trimerisation of isocyanate groups, and
a polyisocyanate component B with at least one polyisocyanate with a
functionality of > 2, the ratio between NCO groups in component B and OH
groups in component A being such that 20:50% of the isocyanate groups in
the system react with water to urethan groups, 10:60% of the isocyanate
groups react to polyurethan groups and 20:45% of this isocyanate groups
trimerize .

2. The two-component system of claim 1, characterized in
that polyol component A additionally contains an organic blowing agent.

3. The two-component system of claim 2, characterized in
that the organic blowing agent used is a hydrocarbon, ether, fluorocarbon
and/or mixture thereof with a boiling point in the range of + 25°C to + 50°C.

4. The two-component system of claim 2 or 3, characterized
in that the blowing agent consists of propane, butane, pentane, isopentane,
cyclopentane, dimethyl ether or mixtures thereof.




5. The two-component system of any of the above claims,
characterized in that polyisocyanate component B contains aromatic
isocyantates, prepolymers from aromatic isocyanates or partially prepolymerized
isocyanates.

6. The two-component system of any of the above claims,
characterized in that polyol component B contains aliphatic polyisocyanates.

7. The two-component system of any of the above claims,
characterized in that polyol component A contains one or more polyether
polyols with a molecular weight in the range of 1000 to 6000 and an OH
number of 10 to 60.

8. The two-component system of any of the above claims,
characterized in that polyol component A contains at least one aromatic
aminopolyol with a functionality of 4 to 6 and an OH number of 400 to 600.

9. The two-component system of any of the above claims,
characterized in that polyol component A contains naturally occurring polyols,
modified natural oils or mixtures thereof.

10. The two-component system of any of the above claims,
characterized in that it contains bis-(2-dimethylaminoethyl)ether, 2-dimethy-
laminoethyl-3-dimethylaminopropylether, pentamethyl triethylenediamine, or
mixtures thereof as the catalyst able to catalyze the reaction of polyisocy-
anate with water or polyol.

11. The two-component system of any of the above claims,
characterized in that it contains a potassium carboxylate, 2,4,6-
tris(dimethylaminoethyl)phenol, Dabco TMR, Dabco TMR-2 or mixtures
thereof as the catalyst catalyzing the trimerization of isocyanate groups.

12. The two-component system of any of the above claims,
characterized in that it contains usual flameproofing agents, stabilizers,


plasticizers, agents for adjusting flowability, cellular structures and viscosity
and the like.

13. The two-component system of any of the above claims,
characterized by an isocyanate index of the system of 120 to 200.

14. A cartridge system containing the two-component
system of any of the above claims.

15. Use of the two-component system of any of claims 1 to
13 for producing canned foam, packaging foam, joint foam and casting
compound.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02242672 1998-07-09



RAPID-FOAMING FOAM FOR PREFABRICATED SYSTEM BUILDING


Description

This invention relates to an improved and fast-foaming urethane fo~m which is
set to be fire-retardant. In particular, the invention relates to an improved reactive
two-component foam of the urethane-isocy~u~ type resulting from the reaction
of a polyol with an isocyanate. The foam is especially suitable for assembly work in
the building trade.
The invention relates further to the application of the foam in assembly work
in parhcular in the building trade. e.g. for frames made of pine-wood for example for
windows and doors. and solid constructions such as masonrv.
Such foam also has other applications. for example as packaging foam. casting
compound and the like.
Pol,vurethane-based utility foams are used in particular in the building trade for
assembling door frames or the like to fix the frames in concrete walls for example.
For a usual door frame one uses up to 6 portions of foam which is introduced into
the joint between frame and wall and foams up there so as to produce good contact
between the two parts, whereupon the foam masses cure into a rigid, dimensionally
stable m~tçri~l fixing the frame. The foams can also be used for sealing wall ducts
for cables and pipes as well as for insulating purposes.
For all these applications it is important that the foam has good adhesive powerand is fully expandable. Such canned foams can exist as one-component systems
(lC) based on an isocyanate-teIminated prepolymer and usually cor,l;~i.,;l-g plastici7-
ers, blowing agents, catalyst and foam stabilizers, and optionally further additives.
Curing is based on the reaction between the termin~l isocyanate groups and waterwhich is taken from the ~ o~ clingc.
Altematively. one can also use 1.5C systems which consist of an isocyanate-
t~rrnin~te~ prepolymer. a separate, small quantity of glycol and blowing agent.
Finally, one can use ~vo-component foams (2C) which are produced by mixing
the liquid components, an isocyanate and a reactive polyol in the presence of a

CA 02242672 1998-07-09



blowing agent, catalyst and foam-stabilizing silicone and optionally further addi-
tives.
Two-component foams for assembly work are usually handled in pressure-
proof containers, for example aluminum aerosol containers charged with propellant
under pressure or packages with a cylindrical chamber whereby the two componentsmust be kept sep~le before use. This can be done by parallel use of two separatecontainers, but also for example by putting one component in an outer container and
the second component in an inner container disposed within this outer container, the
second container being opened by action from outside on the outer container The
content of the second container is then mixed with that of the first container and
leads to the desired reaction. When the valve of the outer container is opened the
foam exits through the valve under the pressure of the propellant located in the con-
tainer. Further, cartridge systems are known in which the two components are passed
out of two cartridges located side by side with the aid of pistons into a mixing head
and discharged via an application system, for example a spray or joint gun.
After the reactive components have first been mixed, the rnixture must be ap-
plied to the application site where it solidifies, sets and develops its a&esive effect.
For assembly purposes one desires for example a fast-curing foam to minimi7e thetime during which the assembled part must be supported. On the other hand one
desires a foam which expands to full size in which it then solidifies.
A typical disadvantage of commercial foam systems is that the mixture remains
flowable too long and it takes too long for the foam to be fully expanded and thereby
become "self-supporting". Part of the resulting foam flows out of the frame and must
be cut off after curing.
To remedy this problem one frequently uses additional aids in the form of pre-
assembled cardboard strips or the like. Nevertheless, it is in most cases necessary to
cut off excess material.
By reason of expected environmental protection regulations it is further desir-
able to have a canned foam system which can be introduced into package systems, is
of simple structure, easy and inexpensive to produce and environmentally accept-able.

CA 02242672 1998-07-09
- 3 -

Canned foarns currently on the market are nonnally of the urethane type (PUR~
and typically have an ~CO surplus of 5 to 10%. With hybrid isocyanate foams
(PUR/PIR) this value is somewhat higher. Pure isocyanurate foams (PIR) with a low
content of urethane groups are known for insulating purposes by reason of their good
fire-retardant properhes. They are processed into blocks or slabs, there being no spe-
cial requirements for foaming time and curing time and their mutual relation.
In the following, the terms "cream time", "rise time" and "tack-free time" will
be used. These generally refer to the time passing from the mixing of the product
until
- the first starhng reaction, and until the product has assumed a vvhitish colorby reason of incipient cell fo~nation (cream time~,
- the foam is fully expanded (rise time), and
- the time at which a rubber glove no longer sticks to the foam surface (tack-
free time).
US-A-5 294 647 (Blanpeid) discloses a method for producing CFC/water-
blown, rigid PURIPIR foams which can be used as insul~ting material. The polyol
component used is mainly a polyester polyol, the NCO/OH ratio being subst~nti~lly
between 2:1 and 5:1. The catalyst s,vstem consists of a) a tertiary amine, and b) an
organic alkali metal salt. The organic aLkali metal salt of the initiator system tempo-
rarily delays urethane formation, while the tertiaIy am~ne simultaneously promotes
the reaction between isocyanate and water and thus the formation of carbon dioxide,
which acts as the primary foaming agent. The organic metal salt subsequently en-sures sufficient reaction heat for evaporating the CFC blowing agent and for com-
plete exp~n~ion of the system before it solidifies. Component a) of the catalyst sys-
tem can be selected from different types. For example, one can use bis(dimethyl-aminoethyl)ether (Thancat CDP) and 2,4,6-tris(dimethylaminomethyl)phenol (K54).
The special composition of the system permits the CFC II type chlorofluorocarbonblowing agents hitherto used to be replaced by HCFC and HCC in combination with
water. The examples show that the tacl~-free ~ne is in several cases shorter ~an the
rise time and that the rise time lasts extremely long, typically more than 75 sec. The

CA 02242672 1998-07-09


high ~lk~linity can lead to hydrolysis of phosphorus-cont~inin~: fire-retardant addi-
tives for example.
US-A-4 785 605 (Williarns) describes the application of stabilizing (with re-
gard to reaction time~) polyester polyols for producing polyurethane or polyisocy-
anate foam. The polyester polvols consist of a ~ ure of a polyester polyol with a
molecular weight of ~00 to 10000 and a functionality of 2 to 6. a tertiary arnine
catalyst, an organic carboxylic acid with a defined dissociation constant which does
not decarboxylate, a fluorocarbon blowing agent and a certain quantity of a non-amine catalyst. To attain sufficient stability, at least as manv carboxylic acid equiv-
alents are present as amine equivalents. The stable and fulthe~nore long reaction
times (the rise time being more than 1 minute ) achieved with this polyester ~ ure
even after long storage at elevated temperature are a consequence of salt formation
between the amine and the added acid. It is therefore important to use substantially
equivalent quantities of acids and ~mines Salt formation can prolong reaction ~me a
little so that it can be expedient to use a little more amine catalyst and the equivalent
quantity of acid. Amine catalysts can be selected at will from the class also including
bis(2-dimethylaminoethyl)ether and 2,4,6-tris(methylaminomethvl)phenol.
The initiator system has also been used for other purposes, as described in l,TS-
A-4 177 173 (Carr) or in an article in the Journal of Applied Polymer Science, Vol.
27, 4029-4042 (1982).
The US docl~ment describes a fast and effectively curing system of polymer-
captan-polyepoxide. The system consists of a polymercaptan and at least one
poly((N,N-dimethylamino)aLkyl)ether with 2. 3 or 4 terhary amino groups.
The aforementioned article contains a study of the kinetics of various catalystsand their use in conjunction with reactions of phenylisocyanate with water and
phenylaniline, in particular for producing polyurea compounds. The studied catalysts
also include bis(dimethylaminoethyl)ether and tris(dimethylaminomethyl)phenol.
The first step of polyurea formation, namely ~e reaction be~ween water and isocy-
anate, is the step in the system that det~ ines reaction rate. The firstmenhonedamine catalyst has the highest velocity constant. There is no hint that these catalysts
can be used advantageously for PUR~PIR systems.

CA 02242672 1998-07-09


A number of urethane catalysts are sold for example bv the firm Condea Che-
mie GmbH, Germany. under the designation Thancat. Special trimerization catalysts
for isocyanate foam are available for example from the firm .~nchor Chemicals un-
der the designation K54.
All in all, it would be desirable to have an ultrafast reac~ing urethane foam
wh~se rise time ends before lack of tackiness begins.
The aim of the invention is to provide a urethane foam which shows corre-
sponding mechanical properties while avoiding the well-known problem of exces-
sive expansion time and deficient tack-free time.
This aim is reached by a two-component system for producing polyurethane
foams which consists of a polyol component A with at least one polyol with a func-
tionality of 2 or more, water and a catalyst system comprising at least two catalysts
at least one of which is able to catalyze the reaction of polyisocyanate with polyol
and/or water and at least one further one of which is able to catalyze the trimeriza-
tion of isocyanate groups, and a polyisocyanate component B with at least one
polyisocyanate with a functionality of 2 2, the ratio between NCO groups in compo-
nent B and reactive OH groups in component A being > 1.
The inventive foarn system refutes the prejudice existing on the market that ul-trafast foams cure before they fully expand and can develop their adhesive effect and
that they show poor adhesiveness on melamine snrf~ces The inventive foam reachesits full volume before losing its a&esiveness, so that one attains a good bond which
is stable under load between the frame structure and the ~ olL~ding masonry whenfoaming cavities and in particular assembling window and door frames.
With slow-reacnng types of foam~ the heat conductivity and capacity of the
m~t~ri~l on which the foam is foamed has great importance for the result. If a large
part of the reaction heat is withdrawn from the foam via the surrounding substrate,
this can cause the glass temperature or necessary reaction tempelalure of the mi~Lure
to "overtake" the foam temp~laLure, in particular during reaction of the isocyanate
groups. which leads to stoppage of the reaction.

CA 02242672 1998-07-09


Melamine composites, for example chipboards with a melarnine surface, have a
great heat capacity which makes it extremely difficult to keep the ~oam temperature
above the glass temp~ e.
It is therefore an advantage that the inventive foam reacts and expands so
quickly that it reaches melamine surfaces in a reactive and a&esive state.
The foams produced with the inventive two-component system can be charac-
terized as water-blown, rigid. tough, hybrid two-component isocy~ula~e-urethane-c~l,&~ide foams. For certain purposes it can be expedient to provide a propellant
component in addition to the water component, whereby one can apply propellants
usual in the field. In the presence of only water, the CO2 released by the reaçtion of
the water acts as the sole propellant.
The individual components and in particular the polyol part are selected so thatreaction temperature is always above glass temperature. This is extremely important
since the reaction otherwise stops. This is an exactly coordinated and novel two-
stage catalyst reaction whose course will be described in detail in the following.
The isocyanate component and polyol component form, after mixin~ a whitish,
low-viscosity mixture cont~ining gas bubbles which foams through the reaction ofisocyanate groups with contained water so as to form CO~ until the water is con-sumed. After that the foam is a pressureless, tough material which still sticks by rea-
son of the surplus isocyanate groups. Any additional blow~ng agents present, for ex-
ample in the form of liquid gases or low-boiling hydrocarbons, evaporate in the
course of this formation process and support foam formation.
An exactly coordinated surplus of isocyanate is of great importance so that the
foam does not crosslink prematurely. For this purpose the catalyst system is de-signed so that after complete expansion of the foam the rem~ining isocyanate groups
c~lsin~ a&esion trimerize into isocyallw~Le groups. After complete consumption of
the isocyanate groups the foam no longer sticks.
The catalyzed formation of isocyanurate groups furthermore results in an im-
provement of the flame-retardant and flame-inhibitory properties of the foam.

CA 02242672 1998-07-09


The combination of these two different reaction paths, urethane formation and
isocyanurate forrnation~ therefore results in a number of effects which are not de-
scribed and are surprising to the expert.
The inventively produced foam additionally has a good cellular structure and
good strength properties as far as tensilelcompressive strength is concerned. In con-
trast to pure isocyanurate foam, it has only low brittleness. It has been ascertained
that the inventively produced foam has quite good strength properties which usually
surpass those of canned foams found on the market. Furtherrnore, the inventive foam
systems involve little bad smell during production. application and from the freshly
produced foam.
The inventively used polyol component constitutes a stable mixture of polyoL
water, any optional additives and blowing agents.
These inventively achieved effects are a consequence of the combination of
certain starting materials, in particular the polvols~ catalvsts~ blovving agent system
and polyisocyanates. However, it must be noted that the inventive formulations are
quite insensitive to deviations as far as the mixture ratio between polyol component
A and isocyanate component B is concerne~ whereby the special composition of
polyol component A plays a part. This is particularly important when using simple
mixing systems in which the delivered material cannot alwavs be optimally mixed.Polyol component A expediently consists of a mixture of 2 or more polyols in
conjunction with water, 2 or more catalysts and optionally a proportion of flame-
retardant and surface-active additives. agents for influencing pore structure and
rheology, and further blowing agent.
It generally holds that the polyol component should be easily liquefiable and
hydrolytically stable within the temperature range important for application. The
polyol component must contain polyols with fast-reacting OH ~TOUpS, i.e. primary or
secondary OH groups. The functionality of the individual polyols should be 2 or
more. It is essential for selection of the polyols ~at they ensure an appro~liate glass
transition temperature.
It is especially suitable for inventive purposes to use difunctional block copoly-
mers from propylene oxide and ethylene oxide. produced by aLkoxylation of for ex-


CA 02242672 1998-07-09


ample ethylene ~lycol, propylene ~lycol or else water as starter molecules. These
copolymers have molecular weights generally in the range of l,000 to 6 000 and OH
numbers in the ran~e of l0 to 60 mg KOHlg. Such difunctional block copolvrners
are very often used as surface-active agents in d~lerge~L~ for example, but also for
IC canned foarns.
Especially ~refel.ed compounds have molar weights of 2,000 to 5,000 and in
particular about 4,000. They contain primary OH groups and consist of a middle
se~,ment of polypropylene oxide which is termin~te~ with polyethylene oxide units.
The inventively used polyols are all liquid, low-viscosit,v compounds with relatively
high equivalent weights which make the arising foam soft and elastic.
As additional or :~ltçrn~tive polyol components one can use naturallv occurring
polyols, such as castor oil. Modified natural oils can likewise be advanta~eously
used, for example polyols from transesterification of triglycerides not containing OH
with glycerol, ethylene glycol and other low-molecular polyols. Other examples of
modified natural oils are epoxidized natural oils, as can be obtained by reaction with
alcohols or polyols, for exarnple epoxidized soy oil. Finally, one can likewise use
commercial diols or triols which have been obtained by propoxylation or ethoxyla-
tion of starter molecules such as water, trimethylolpropane, glycerol, ethylene gly-
cols, propylene glycol or the like.
Application of these special polyols permits the ~rlm~ re of relatively 8reat
4ua~1ilies of water. If hydrocarbons or sirnilar compounds are used as a propellant,
they can be admixed without compatibility problems. Using pentane type propellants
for example, far more water could be admixed than expected.
It is especially suitable to use the abovementioned difunctional block copoly-
mers of propylene oxide, as are available for e~ample under the tr~-lem~rk~ Syn-peronic and Pluronic. The low HLB of these polyols provides good miscibility with
the isocyanate component and facilitates dispersion of water. Furthermore, it stabi-
lizes viscosity and acts as a solvent for other con~it lent~ of the polyol component.
A second especially suitable ~roup of polyols in polyol component A is a
"hard" polyol, as sold for exarnple under the trademark Arcol. These are aromatic

CA 02242672 1998-07-09



aminopolyols with OH numbers of 400 to 600 and a functionality of 4 to 6. In
chemical terms, these are propoxylated di(hydroxyethylaminomethyl!phenols.
These are high-viscosity compounds with a syruw consistency at room tem-
p~.alule. Viscosity increases with functionality. By reason of the aromatic core these
compounds are self-extin~ hin~ These aromatic aminopolyols have a very steep
viscosity increase below room temperature at which the aromatic aminopolyols also
assume a ~lassy form. Especially good results are achieved according to the inven-
tion if polyols of the firstmentioned "soft" type are combined with those of the last-
mentioned "hard" type. The weight ratio of "soft" to "hard" polyols can expediently
be between 6:1 and 1 2~ in paIticular between 4:1 and 1:1.
A further essential aspect of the invention is the catalyst mixture used. The
special requirements for the foamin~ process and the course of curing cannot be ful-
filled with catalysts used in known foam systems. One requires a catalyst systemwhich causes not only polyurethane formation but also the formation of isoc~a~urale
groups. Furthermore it is essential that the catalysts used act sufficiently quickly for
polyurethane formation to fulfill the requirements for rise time.
A group of catalysts meeting these requirements is amine compounds with an
ether function in the 2 position from the tertiary nitrogen atom. One example of such
a compound is bis(dimethylaminoethyl)ether, another is 2-dimethylaminoethyl-3-
dimethylaminopropylether. Such catalysts are sold under the designation Thancat
CDP or DD.
A further catalyst compound suitable for the inventive system is pentamethyl-
diethylene~ mine.
Trimerization catalysts used for polyisocya~ e formation can be the usual
catalysts for this reaction, such as potassium carboxylates, for example potassium
acetate or octoate; Dabco TMR and Dabco TMR -2, as well as 2,4,6-tris(dimethyl-
an~inomethyl)phenol, i.e. catalysts based on alkali carboxylates, q~l~tern~ry ammo-
nium salts or phenol-substituted trialkylarnines. Such a catalyst is available on the
market under the trade name K54.

CA 02242672 1998-07-09

- 10-

It is particularly preferred and suitable for the inventive foam systems to com-bine a urethane catalyst of the trademark Thancat. in par~icular Thancat CDP or DD,
with the trimerization catalyst K54.
The catalysts should not be too alkaline amines if the inventive two-component
system contains phosphate esters as a fire-retardant. Phosphate esters are decom-
posed by alkaline amines in the presence of water.
Thancat catalysts are known for fast catalysis of water or polyol with isocy-
anate groups. It has turned out that they act much faster than K54 and other trimeri-
zation catalysts, so that the reaction between isocyanate and water or polyol takes
place faster than K54 can catalyze trimerization and curing during isocyanurate for-
mation.
The two catalysts of the catalyst system and K54 can be used in equal quanti-
ties of more than 0.84 wt%, preferably more than about 3.0 wt%, based on the
weight of polyol and water and coordinated with the quantity of isocyanate. The
content is typically altogether between 7 and 10 wt~,~o, based on polyol and water.
Polyol component A can contain not only water, which acts both as a blowing
agent and as a reactive and cross~inking component, but also further blowing agents
if this is necessa~y or advantageous for certain applications. One can use in this con-
nection in particular low-boiling ethers, hydrocarbons and fluorocarbons as are usu-
ally employed for producing polyurethane foams. It is preferred according to theinvention to use in particular dimethyl ether, propane, butane, pentane, isopentane
and cyclopentane and mixtures thereof. One can generally use those liquid or lique-
fiable blowing agents whose boiling point is between -40~C and 50~C.
Isocyanate component B contains at least one polyisocyanate with a function-
ality of 2 or more. The polyisocyanates used can primarily be aromatic polyisocya-
nates, such as MDI (methylene-4,4'-diphenyl diisocyanate) and TDI (toluene diiso-
cyanate), each either in raw form or in the forrn of the pure isomers or mixtures
thereof (phenylene diisocyanate, xylylene diisocyanate, triphenyl methane triisocya-
nate, toluene triisocyanate, polymethylene polyphenyl polyisocyanate and NDI
(diisocyanaton~phth~lene). Further, one can use prepolymers of aromatic isocya-


CA 02242672 1998-07-09


nates and partially prepolvmerized isocyanates, such as liquid, carbodiimide-contain-
in~ MDI.
Aliphatic and alicyclic polyisocyanates can likewise be used, ~ref~l~bly also inLule with aromatic polyisocyanates. Examples are HDI ( 1,6-diisocyanatohexane)
and IPDI (isophorone diisocyanate), also hydrogenated MDI and TD~. It is particu-
larly preferred to use a proportion of ~liph~lic polyisocyanates of up to 50 wt% of
isocyanates B.
It is alto~ether unportant that the ratio of NCO groups and OH grou~s is ~ 1
and in particular between 1.2 and 2Ø A ratio of about 1.3 to about 1.8 is preferred,
one between 1.4 and about 1.6 particularly preferred. The surplus of NCO equiva-lents is essential for controlling tack-free time.
The term "NCO groups" refers to the total number of NCO groups in polyiso-
cyanate component B. The term "OH groups" refers to the OH groups present in thepolyols used and moreover also includes active hydrogen as is contained for example
in water and possibly in the amine catalyst and in additives and is capable of reac-
tion with the NCO groups.
The isocyanate component and polyol component should be composed if pos-
sible so that the components have more or less equal viscosity, which favors misci-
bility. This is of some importance, particularly when mi~Lul~ iS done in simple mix-
ing apparatuses such as known static mixers.
A further advantage of the inventive polyol ~lule is that viscosity is little de-
pendent on temperalu-~ over a wide temperature interval of about 5~C to about
30~C, and largely equal reaction times are achieved within this temper~lure interval.
The low temperature sensitivity in relation to known cornmercial products is a
special advantage since for example the room tempe~alLue in new buildings, etc.,typically extends over a wide range.
The inventive foam systems have reduced cream time and rise time compared
to conventional systems, while tack-free time is suitable. Tack-free time sets in only
after rise time under all circumstances, so that the foam is fully e~panded before
losing its tackiness. The creamy and viscous nature of the developing product fur-
~ermore leads to better a&esion to the desired site and to an optimurn foaming

CA 02242672 1998-07-09
- 12-

process without the product tending to "run out". This reduces material consumption,
and one need not subsequently remove anv great amounts of (excess) foam.
The inventive two-component systems in particular permit the system to have,
after mixing a cream time of 1 to 4 seconds a rise time of ~ tO 15 seconds and atack-free time of 10 seconds and more, the tack-free time always setting in only after
the end of the expansion process generally about 5 seconds later.
Both polyol component A and isocyanate component B can contain usual ad-
ditives as are known and find application in this field. For example the polyol mix-
tures can contain relatively ~reat quantities of flame retardant typically phosphate
esters or phosphonates. These can also be drawn to the foam as plasticizers. Oneshould preferably use ones which are very stable hydrolytically for example TCPP(trichloropro~yl phosphate) or Fyrol PCF (org. phosphoric ester).
The quantity of water should suffice to provide the quantity of CO2 necessary
for the foaming process. On the other hand, the proportion of urea groups present in
the foam should not be too great because this increases brittleness. Altogether the
water content should be such that 20 to 50% of the isocyanate groups present in the
system can react exhaustively with water into urea groups. The brittleness of the
arising foam system can be controlled by suitable selection of "soft" polyols and by
the addition of plasticizers and fire-retardant additives.
The polyol content in the polyol component is expediently such that about l0
to 50% of the isocyanate groups can react exh~1lstively into polyuredlane groups.
Simnlt~neously, the isocyanate index of the polyisocyanate component should be in
the range of 120 to 200. This corresponds to a 20 to 100% surplus of isocyanate
groups over the OH groups.
The blowing a~ent is provided primarily by the CO2 formed by reaction of the
water. It may be desirable to add further blowing agents as well. For pressureless
applications out of cartndges, one can use aliphatic or cycloaliphatic hydrocarbons
with a boiling point of 25 to 50~C, for example isopentane or cyclopentane with
boiling points at 28~C and 49~C.
If the polyol mixture is not fully homogeneous, the necessa~y homogeneity can
be achieved by shaking the container directly before application.

CA 02242672 1998-07-09
- 13 -

The inventive two-component systems can, as mentioned, contain usual addi-
tives such as surface-active compounds, thickening agents and the like.
The surface-active compounds used can be silicone compounds which ensure a
stable cellular structure and result in a more elastic surface film. which is important
for the foaming phase. Silicones in addition initiate bubble formation and stabilize
the bubbles in the mass. As a result this can influence bubble size and elasticity.
The specific gravity of the foam can be influenced by the blowing agent. If a
usual evaporable blowing agent is used it can be contained in the polyol part in a
quantity of 3 to 14%, in palticular 5 to 11%, based on the polyol part.
It must furthermore be underlined that the additives necessaly for the quality of
the foam can fundamentally be contained both in polyol component A and in isocy-anate component B, as required, if they do not pa~ticipate reactively in foam forma-
tion.
An especially preferred polyurethane system for assembly purposes has the
following composition:

Polyol component A
8 to 28 wt% difi~nctional polyol
20 to 40 wt% aromatic polyol
15 to 45 wt% flame retardant
1.5 to 10 wt% catalyst for urethane formation
O to 12 wt% catalyst for trimerization
0.5 to 3.0 wt% water
0 to 12 wt% additional blowing agent (hydrocarbon')
1.5 to 3.0 wt% surface-active agent

Isocyanate component B
80 to 100% polyisocyanate
20 to 0% fire-retardant additives

Further preferred compositions are evident from the examples.

CA 02242672 1998-07-09




The inventive two-component foam systems can be produced both from pres-
sureless cartridges and from pressure cans. Using pressure cans. the two components
A and B can be contained in se~ te pressure cans and ~imlllt~neously discharged
and mixed by an apparatus known for such purposes. For storing the two compo-
nents one can also use conventionl 2C aerosol cans, however. which contain the
second component in a s~ Le chamber in its interior which is opened before use
by a trigger meçh~nicm o~ ted from the outside and dischalges its co~lh.,b into
the ~ oul~ding pressure can.
In any case isocy~nate component B and polyol component A can be ixed
and discharged with the aid of conventional eql~ipment using known techniques.
Since the inventive system can be adjusted almost without pressure. it is possi-ble to store components A and B in foil containers and apply them out of such con-
tainers. This is an advantage over known pressure systems. in particular as far as
product and industrial safety are concerned.

Example

A number of compositions for polyol component A and polyisocyanate com-
ponent B were produced. These foTmlll~tions can be stored without pressure and
yield, through mixing, inventive foam systems which in each case fulfill the re-~uirements for cream time, rise time and tack-free time. All examples ,vielded very
serviceable c~nnerl foams with high tensile strength suitable for application to mela-
mine. For each composition the NCO surplus and NCO index are also stated~ as well
as the breakdown of NCO consumption by water, polyol and tnme~7~*on.
Two-component foam systems suitable for discharge from cartridges were pro-
duced from the form~ tions for polyol component A and isocyanate component B
laid down in Tables 1 and 2. All st~teme~t.s are in percent by weight, unless other-
wise stated.

CA 02242672 1998-07-09



Table l
Polyol component A
Formulation
1/1 1/2 1/3 1/4 1/5 1/6 1/7 1/8
EO/PO block
copolymer 1 15.9 25.3 15.9 15.9 15.9 21.2 15.9 16.2
Aromahc
aminopolyol 2 25.1 25.3 25.1 25.1 25.1 33.4 25.1 25.6
Water 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 2.7 1.7 3.0
(OH number 6230)
Cyclopentane 11.9
TMCP 50.0 40.4 48.2 48.1 49.1 33.4 35.1 47.5
Silicone SR 321 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.7 2.0
UAX6164 4 7
Thancat CDP 70% 3.0 3.0 1.5 0.5 0.5 4.0 3.0 1.0
K 54 2.0 2.0 5.3 5.3 5.3 2.7 5.3 2.0
OH number 262 324 262 324 262 350 243 327

Isocyanate component B
Desmodur
44V20L 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
NCO % content 31.60 31.60 31.60 31.6031.60 31.60 31.60 31.60

Cartridge
Weight on filling
polyol 93.3 91.1 9~.9 9~.9 93.1 90.5 89.8 93.0
Weight on filling
isocyanate 96.0 g6.0 96.0 96.0 96.0 96.Q 96.0 96.0
Masstotal 189.3 187.1 188.9 188.9 189.1 186.5 185.8 189.0

CA 02242672 1998-07-09
- 16 -

NCO ~~O sulplus 6.37 4.40 6.43 4.13 6.39 3.56 7.54 4.03
NCO index 166 137 167 134 166 128 186 133
by water % 31 47 31 47 31 42 27 47
by polyol % 30 27 30 29 30 37 28 29
by tlimeri7~hon % 39 26 39 24 39 20 45 24
Sum % 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

EO/PO block copolymer 1 Synperonic L 121 wi~ 10% EO portio~ MW about
4400, OH number 25.5
Aromatic aminopolyol 2 Arcol 3750, OH number 530
Desmodur 44V20L raw MDI

Table 2
Polyol c~mponent A
Fonm-l~ion
211 2l2 2l3 2/4 2l5 2l6 2l7 2l8
Rape oil
transe~ ified 29.0 44.0
Rape oil modified
(water) 32.0
Soy oil modified
(me~anol) 32.5
EO/PO block
copolymer 3 37.0 37.0
EO/PO block
copolymer 2 37.0 27.0
EO/PO block
copolymer 1 37.0 25.0 20.0 25.0
Aromatic
an~inopolyol 2 24.0

CA 02242672 1998-07-09



Aromatic
aminopolyol 3 24.0 24.0 24.0 10.0
Water
(OHnumber6230) 3 0 3.0 3.0 3 0 3 0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Plasticizer phos-
phorus-cont~ining 29 5 30.5 30.5 29.5 70.0 18.5 24.5 20.0
Flameproofing agent,
chlorine-co~ 6 5 8.0
Flameproofing agent~
bromine-co~2~ g,
O H nuDnb~r 239 10.0 8.0 ~
Stabilizer 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2 0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Bis(dimethylamino-
ethyl)ether 2.0 2.0 2.0 ~.0 2.0 2.0
Pentamethyl
diethylene~iamine 3 0 3.0
K 54 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5
OH number ~28 331 334 329 269 271 292 289

Isocyanate component B
Desmodur 44 V 20 L 100.0 98.0 98.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
Stabilizer 1.0 1.0
Thixo~oping 1.0 1.0
NCO % content 31.60 30.97 30.97 31.60 31.60 31.60 31.60 31.60

Cartridg~
Weight on filling
polyol 88.5 89.0 88.7 88.9 90.9 88.~ 88.~ 85.6
Weight on filling
isocyanate 96.0 95.6 95.6 96 0 96.0 96.0 96.0 96.0

CA 02242672 1998-07-09
- 18-

Mass total 184.5 184.7 184.3 184.9 186.9 184.2 184.5 181.6
NCO % content 4.66 4. l l 4.04 4.57 6.~3 6.76 5.98 6.51
INDEX 139 134 133 138 165 169 157 164
bywater 47 47 47 47 47 47 47 47
by polyol 26 27 28 27 15 13 18 15
by trimeri7~tion 27 26 25 26 38 40 36 38
Sum in % 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
Table 2/contimle~ ~
Polyoi component A
Fo~mll~tion
2/9 2/10 2/11 2112
Polypropylene triol,
OH number 380 ~o o
Castor oil 23.0
Rape oil, modified
(water) 10.5
Rape oil, modified
(butanol) 34.0
EO/PO block
copolymer 1 15.0 26.0 37.0 30.0
Aromatic
aminopolyol 1 10.0
Aromatic
aminopolyol3 11.5
Water 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Plasticizer. phos-
phorus-cor~ 30.0 31.5 30.0 30.0
Flameproofing agent,
bromine-cont~inin~ 23.5

CA 02242672 1998-07-09

- 19-

Stabilizer 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0

Bis(dimeth~lamino-
eth,~l~ether ~.0 ~.0 ~.0 ~.o
K 54 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5
OH number 301 277 253 297

Isocyanate component B
Desmodur
44V20L 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
NCO ~~O content 31.60 31.60 31.60 31.60

Cartridgc
Wei~ht on filling
polyol 86.8 86.4 95.2 87.5
Weight on fillin~
isocyanate 96.0 96.0 96.0 96.0
Mass total 182.8 182.4 191.2 183.5
NCO % content 5.93 6.82 6.46 5.96
INDEX 155 169 169 156
by water 47 47 47 47
by polyol 19 13 13 18
by trimerization 34 40 40 35

Sum in % 100 100 100 100
Rape oil, transesterified with ethylene ~lycol (90: 10)~ OH number 180
Rape oil, epoxi~i7e~ modified with water, OH number ~48
Soy oil, epoxidized, mo~ified with methanol, OH numb~r 118
Rape oil, epoxidized. modified ~rith n-butanol, OH number 137
EO/PO block copolymer 3 ~Synperonic L81) ~ith 10% EO po~on, M~ about
2700, OH llumber 41

CA 02242672 1998-07-09
- 20 -

EO/PO block copolymer 2 (Syn~eronic L92! with ~0% EO porhon~ I~fW about340Q, OH numbe~ 3~
EOfPO '~ k ~ p(~lylll~:L i ~Synp~r~ L121) with 10% EO pOl~ IW ~out
4400, OH number 25.5
Aromatic aminopolyol I Arcol 3541, OH number 4~5
Aroma~ic 3minopolyol ~ Arcol 3750, OH number ~30
Alomatic ~i~poly~13 Arcul 375B, OH nu~lJer 5S0

All formlltations yield foams with good properties in teIms of compressive
strength and a&esion to wood veneer, mei~mine~ masonry and concrete. The foams
have specific gravities in the range of 30 to 50 kg/m3.
All foams according to Tables 1 and 2 showed the ri~ht order as far as rise timeand tack-free time are concerned. Foam expansion was teIm~nated after 4 to 15 sec-
onds and lack of tackiness reached after 13 to 33 seconds. By reason of the ex-
tremely short cream time of less than 3 seconds there was only a low tendency to run
and flow off. Application was simple in each case. Especially good strength proper-
ties are reached with an NCO/OH ratio of 2 1.4.

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 2242672 was not found.

Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date Unavailable
(86) PCT Filing Date 1996-11-29
(87) PCT Publication Date 1997-06-12
(85) National Entry 1998-07-09
Dead Application 2000-11-29

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
1999-11-29 FAILURE TO PAY APPLICATION MAINTENANCE FEE

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Application Fee $300.00 1998-07-09
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 1998-10-15
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 2 1998-11-30 $100.00 1998-11-27
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
RATHOR AG
Past Owners on Record
HOLMSKOV, INGE
KAABER, HENNING
KINDT-LARSEN, TURE
LARSEN, HANS OLE
VON SCHOLTEN, BENT
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Abstract 1998-07-09 1 19
Claims 1998-07-09 3 80
Description 1998-07-09 20 903
Cover Page 1998-10-15 1 42
Assignment 1998-07-09 4 170
Prosecution-Amendment 1998-07-09 6 187
Correspondence 1998-09-22 1 30
Assignment 1998-10-15 4 96
Fees 1998-11-27 1 46
International Preliminary Examination Report 1998-07-09 25 832