Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
CA 02242993 1998-07-14
FI LF,'~~ 6~ S A P=-f#M
TE.'X--~ 't r'M'SLATI(?N
SPECIFICATION
THIN FILM OF NON-PROTONIC ELECTROLYTE, ELECTROLYTE-
IMMOBILIZED LIQUID-FILM CONDUCTOR AND POLYMER BATTERY
TECHNICAL FIELD
This invention relates to a thin film of non-protonic electrolyte, electrolyte-
immobilized liquid-film conductor and polymer battery, and, more particularly,
the thin film of essentially solid, non-protonic electrolyte in which the non-
electrolytic solution is selectively swollen and immobilized in the
protonic
microporous polyolefin film, the electrolyte-immobilized liquid-film conductor
of
high electron conductivity in which an ionic conductor is immobilized in the
microporous polyolefin film, and the polymer battery with the thin film of non-
protonic electrolyte as the electrolyte and the electrolyte-immobilized liquid-
film conductor used for at least one of the anode and cathode.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Functions of portable electronic devices, such as cellular phone and
information terminals, largely depend on those of built-in devices, which
include not only semiconductors and electronic circuits but also rechargeable
secondary batteries. Therefore, the built-in battery is increasingly demanded
to be higher in capacity, lighter and smaller simultaneously.
The batteries of lead or nickel-cadmium, which have been used for the above
purposes, are difficult to be still lighter and smaller, because of their
insufficient energy density. As a result, the nickel-metal hydride battery
having an energy density twice as high as that of nickel-cadmium battery and
the lithium ion battery having a still higher energy density than the nickel-
1
CA 02242993 1998-07-14
metal hydride battery have been developed and attracting attention.
The lithium battery is a battery of non-aqueous solution or solid electrolyte
having a high energy density, and has been commercialized as the back-up
power source for semiconductor memories of small electrical current and also
as
the power source for watches and cameras. For the battery to have wider
applicable areas, such as driving and power storage, it should be further
developed to a super thin lithium secondary battery which is lighter, more
diversified in shape and more flexible.
However, there are many problems to be solved to improve functions and
safety of the secondary battery. These problems include short circuit and
ignition resulting from formation of dendrite in the lithium battery.
Discovery
of an electrolyte having a longer charge/discharge cycle life is one of the
themes
to improve reliability of the battery.
The electrolytic solution of the lithium battery is required to show ion
conductivity and, at the same time, low electron conductivity to prevent short
circuit and accidental discharge resulting from electrons conducted between
the
anode and cathode. The solid electrolyte has advantages of suffering no liquid
leakage, and simplified schemes for thin film making and increasing area.
The electrolytic solution for the conventional batteries may be replaced for
the battery of solid polymer electrolyte. In particular, for development of
super
thin film battery, which is referred to as paper battery, and electrochemical
devices having a large area, such as electrochromic devices, it is necessary
to
develop solid polymer electrolytes for easiness of assembling and stability
over
extended periods.
In particular, the lithium secondary battery of solid polymer electrolyte has
been attracting much attention, because of its various advantages, such as no
formation of dendrite which may cause damages resulting from short circuit
2
CA 02242993 1998-07-14
and ignition, no leakage of liquid unlike the case of a solution type
secondary
battery, and particularly ability of being made into a thin film and large
area.
Some of the conventional solid polymer type solid electrolytes use a lithium
salt such as LiC1O4 dissolved and dispersed in a polymer, such as polyether
including polyethylene oxide and polypropylene oxide, polyester, polyimide and
polyether derivatives. Such an electrolyte, however, needs a sufficiently
higher
temperature above room temperature to exhibit its ionic conductivity of 10' to
10-"S/cm.
Therefore, solidified liquid electrolytes for polymer batteries have been
attracting attention, in particular those of gelled polymers with matrices
impregnated with a solution similar to that for the conventional solution type
lithium battery with respect to salt and solvent that dissolves it. These
electrolytes include cross-linked polyalkylene oxide as disclosed by USP
4,303,748 and gelled polyacrylate as disclosed by USP 4,830,939. More
recently, the technique has been developed to produce the electrolyte of
polymer
gel which is impregnated with a polycarbonate solution with a lithium salt
dissolved in a copolymer of polyvinylidene fluoride and hexafluoropropylene,
as
disclosed by USP 5,296,318. These electrolytes, however, have still problems
of
solvent maintainability, because the electrolytic solution may ooze out at
high
temperature as a result of gel shrinkage.
For the conductor, a thin-film conductor (porous conducting film) having a
high conductivity in spite of its high porosity can be effectively used as the
electrode or as a material for the electrode of the device which involves a
solid
polymer or liquid electrolyte. Its high porosity provides it with a large
contact
interface between the electrode and electrolyte, making it suitable for
primary
and secondary lithium batteries of high functions.
3
CA 02242993 1998-07-14
Japanese Patent Laid-Open No.3-87096 discloses a porous conductive film
and production thereof, where an electrolytic solution is immobilized by
capillary condensation force on the porous thin film produced from a
plasticizer
solution of polyethylene mixed with Ketjen black (trade name of Akzo Chemie),
which is molded into sheet, drawn and treated to remove the plasticizer.
However, the problems associated with maintainability of electrolytic solution
are not completely solved by this technique. More recently, the new technique
has been developed to use polymer gel for the anode and cathode of the
battery,
where the polymer gel is impregnated with a polycarbonate solution with
LiMnzO.1 and carbon black or petroleum coke and carbon black dissolved in a
copolymer of polyvinylidene fluoride and hexafluoropropylene, as disclosed by
USP 5,296,318. These electrolytes, however, have still problems of solvent
maintainability, because the electrolytic solution may ooze out at high
temperature as a result of gel shrinkage. Therefore, thin-film conductors
which can be easily produced to have a large area and exhibit stable
maintainability of the electrolytic solution over a wide temperature range are
increasingly demanded.
The thin film has another advantage of reduced effective resistance.
Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 1-158051 discloses a technique to immobilize a
{ liquid ion conductor using capillary condensation in the fine pores of 0.l m
or
less in size in the thin, porous film of solid polymer having a thickness of
50 m
or less. However, this technique by itself cannot drastically solve the
problems
associated with operational temperature.
It is an object of the present invention to solve the above problems, and to
{ provide a thin film of non-protonic electrolyte which is easily produced
into thin
film and to have a large area, holds the solvent for the non-protonic
electrolytic
solution over a wide temperature range, works stably over extended periods and
4
CA 02242993 1998-07-14
has improved mechanical strength; an electrolyte-immobilized liquid-film
conductor; and a polymeric battery in which at least one of the thin film of
non-
protonic electrolyte and electrolyte-immobilized liquid-film conductor is
used.
DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION
The present invention provides a thin film of non-protonic electrolyte in
which a microporous polyolefin film is impregnated with an immobilized non-
protonic electrolytic solution. The film is treated in advance to have
improved
affinity for the non-protonic solution. The applicable treatment methods
include graft polymerization of the polyolefin film with a monomer which can
dissolve the non-protonic electrolytic; coating of the film with terminal-
modified
polypropylene which can dissolve the non-protonic electrolytic solution; and
coating of the film with wax which can dissolve the non-protonic electrolytic
solution. The porous polyolefin film can be made from a polyolefin composition
containing terminal-modified polypropylene or wax.
The present invention also provides an electrolyte-immobilized liquid-film
conductor in which a microporous polyolefin film is impregnated with an
immobilized non-protonic electrolytic solution, the film containing an
electron-
conductive substance and being treated in advance to have improved affinity
for
the non-protonic solution.
The present invention also provides a polymer battery with the thin film as
the non-protonic electrolyte, and also with the anode and cathode, where at
least one of the anode and cathode uses the electrolyte-immobilized liquid
film
conduGtor of microporous polyolefin film containing an electron-conductive
substance.
PREFERREED EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION
CA 02242993 1998-07-14
The present invention is described in more detail.
A. Thin Film of Non-Protonic Electrolyte
The thin film of non-protonic electrolyte of the present invention has a
microporous polyolefin film as the basic component, where a non-protonic
electrolytic solution is immobilized in the polyolefin film containing a
substance
which makes the film affinitive for the non-protonic electrolytic solution.
The
methods to produce the porous polyolefin film containing a substance
affinitive
for the non-protonic electrolytic_ solution include graft polymerization of a
monomer which can dissolve the non-protonic electrolytic solution with the
polyolefin film; making the film from a composition of polyolefin mixed with a
substance having affinity for the non-protonic electrolytic solution, coating
of
the film with a substance having affinity for the non-protonic electrolytic
solution, the thin, porous polyolefin film thus produced being impregnated
with
the immobilized non-protonic electrolytic solution. Production of the thin
film
is described more concretely:
1. The Microporous Polyolefin Film
a. Polyolefin
Polyolefines useful for the present invention include polyethylene,
polypropylene, copolymer of ethylene and propylene, polybutene-1, poly-4-
methylpentene-1, of which polyethylene is more preferable. Polyethylene
useful for the present invention includes ultra-high-molecular-weight
polyethylene, high-density polyethylene, and medium- and low-density
polyethylene, of which ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene or composition
that contains it is more preferable, for strength, safety and easiness of film-
making.
6
CA 02242993 1998-07-14
The above polyolefin preferably contains at least 1% by weight of ultra-high-
molecular-weight component having a weight-average molecular weight of 5 x
105 or higher, more preferably in a range from 1 x 106 to 1 x 10', and a
molecular
weight distribution (weight-average molecular weight/number-average
molecular weight) of 10 to 300. The ultra-high-molecular-weight polyolefin
component shows insufficient contribution to drawability of the film, when its
content is lower than 1% by weight. The upper limit of the content is not
limited. The molecular weight distribution above 300 is not desirable, because
of possible fracture by the lower-molecular-weight component to decrease
strength of the whole film.
The polyolefin may be produced by multi-stage polymerization or may be a
composition of two or more types of olefin, so long as it has the above
molecular
weight and molecular weight distribution.
The polyolefin containing the ultra-high-molecular-weight component may
contain, as required, one or more additives, such as oxidation inhibitor,
ultraviolet absorber, anti-blocking agent, pigment, dye, inorganic filler and
so
on, to an extent that causes no damages of the objectives of the present
invention.
b. Production of Microporous Polyolefin Film
The microporous polyolefin film may be produced by the method disclosed by
Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 60-242035 or 3-64334. More concretely, it can
be produced by a series of processes described below:
The polyolefin is dissolved in a solvent under heat, to prepare the solution.
The solvents useful for the present invention include aliphatic or cyclic
hydrocarbons, such as nonane, decane, decalin, p-xylene, undecane, dodecane
and liquid paraffin, and mineral fractions having a corresponding boiling
point.
The dissolution under heat may be effected by stirring the polyolefin in the
7
CA 02242993 1998-07-14
solvent at a temperature which allows complete dissolution of the polyolefin,
or
by uniformly mixing them in an extruder. Temperature at which the polyolefin
is dissolved in the solvent with stirring varies depending on types of polymer
and solvent, but is in a range from 140 to 250 C. The polyolefin is preferably
dissolved in an extruder, when the film is produced from a high-concentration
solution of polyolefin.
Polyolefin content of the solution is in a range from 10 to 50% by weight,
more preferably from 10 to 40% by weight, or solvent content is in a range
from
90 to 50% by weight, more preferably from 90 to 60% by weight. Decreasing
polyolefin content to below 10% by weight (or increasing solvent content to
above 90% by weight) will cause excessive swell and neck-in of the solution at
the die outlet, when it is molded into sheet, to damage sheet moldability and
self-supporting property. Increasing polyolefin content to above 50% by weight
(or decreasing solvent content to below 50% by weight) will damage moldability
of the solution.
The polyolefin solution molten and kneaded under heat is then molded by an
extruder.
The polyolefin solution is normally molded by a sheet mold with a
rectangular mouth piece, but a double-cylindrical mold for production of
hollow
fibers and inflation mold can be also used. When a sheet mold is used, the
polyolefin solution is extruded normally at 20 to 30cm/min or 5 to lOm/min,
after being heated to 140 to 250 C, through a mold gap normally in a range
from
0.1 to 5mm.
The polyolefin solution extruded out of the mold is quenched, preferably at a
rate of at least 50 C/min, into gel.
The molded gel is then drawn under heat by the conventional method, such
as tenter, rolling, inflation, hot rolling or a combination thereof at a given
draw
8
CA 02242993 1998-07-14
ratio. Drawing may be monoaxial or biaxial, the latter being more preferable.
Biaxial drawing may be effected in longitudinal and transverse directions
simultaneously of sequentially.
Drawing temperature is melting point of the polyolefin + 10 C, or lower,
more preferably in a range from the crystal dispersion temperature to the
crystal melting point. In the case of polyethylene, it is in a range from 90
to
140 C, more preferably from 100 to 130 C.
Draw ratio varies depending on sheet thickness. It is preferably 2 or higher,
more preferably 3 to 30, in the case of monoaxial drawing. Area draw ratio in
the case of biaxial drawing is preferably 10 or higher, more preferably 15 to
400.
Drawing is insufficient at an area draw ratio below 10 to give a microporous
film of high elasticity and strength, and drawing operation tends to be
limited
at an area draw ratio above 400.
The drawn product is washed with a solvent to remove the residual solvent.
The solvents useful for washing are volatile ones, including hydrocarbons,
such
as pentane, hexane and heptane; chlorinated hydrocarbons, such as methylene
chloride and carbon tetrachloride; fluorinated hydrocarbons, such as ethane
trifluoride; and ethers, such as diethyl ether, and dioxane.
It is preferable to solidify the washed product at a temperature in a range
from the crystal dispersion temperature to the crystal melting, after it is
dried
to remove the washing solvent.
c. Properties
The polyolefin film with fine pores is 0.1 to 100 m thick, preferably 0.2 to
50 m thick. Thickness of below 0.l m causes practical problems, such as
insufficient mechanical strength and difficulty in handling, whereas thickness
above 100 m excessively increases effective resistance and decreases
volumetric efficiency.
9
CA 02242993 1998-07-14
Porosity of the film is not limited, so long as it is in a range from 30 to
95%.
Porosity below 30% may cause.insufficient immobilization of the non-protonic
electrolytic solution, whereas that above 95% is impractical, because of
insufficient film strength.
Average pore size is preferably 1 m or less. It is difficult to control
diffusion of the active substances and reaction products, when average pore
size
exceeds 1 m. The lower limit is not limited, but some problems may occur
during the graft polymerization process, such as uneven polymerization and
polymerization rate, when it is below 0.005 m.
The microporous polyolefin film has preferably a fracture strength of
200kg/cm2 or higher. Such a film will be sufficiently resistant to deformation
by swelling, when the non-protonic electrolytic solution is dissolved in the
graft
polymer.
2. Method to provide surfaces of the microporous polyolefin film and its pores
with affinity for the non-protonic electrolytic solution by graft
polymerization
a. Monomers for Graft Polymerization
The monomers with affinity for non-protonic electrolytic solutions include
acrylic acid, methacrylic acid, acrylic acid ester, methacrylic acid ester,
acrylamide, acrylonitrile, styrene and their derivatives. Acrylic acid esters
include acrylic monomers, such as methyl acrylate, ethyl acrylate, butyl
acrylate, isobutyl acrylate, 2-ethyl hexyl acrylate, lauryl acrylate, stearyl
acrylate, ethyldecyl acrylate, ethylhexyldecyl acrylate, 2-ethoxyethyl
acrylate,
tetrahydrofurfuryl acrylate, trimethylolpropane triacrylate, 2-hydroxyethyl
acrylate, 2-hydroxypropyl acrylate, 1,4-butadiol diacrylate, and 1,6-hexadiol
diacrylate. Methacrylic acid esters include methacrylic monomers, such as
methyl methacrylate, ethyl methacrylate, butyl methacrylate, 2-ethylhexyl
CA 02242993 2007-04-25
77486-3
methacrylate, tridecyl methacrylate, stearyl methacrylate, cyclohexyl
methacrylate, benzyl methacrylate, 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate, 2-
hydroxypropyl methacrylate, glycidyl methacrylate and ethylene glycol
dimethacrylate. They can be used either alone or in combination. Cross-
linkable monomers, such as vinyl acrylate, vinyl methacrylate, divinyl benzene
and butyl vinylacrylate may be used, as required. Of these, more preferable
monomers are acrylic acid, methacrylic acid and their esters, and acrylic
monomers such as acrylamide and its derivatives.
The monomer is selected from-the above, depending on solvent type for the
electrolytic solution used to produce the thin-film electrolyte. More
concretely,
it is selected in consideration of the Hansen parameter as one of solubility
parameters. The Hansen parameter is a solubility parameter in which the
effects on solubility are divided into three component, Sd, 6p and Sh
representing
the. effects by non-polar interactions, polarization and hydrogen bonds,
respectively, which are plotted in a three-dimensional coordinates (C. M.
Hansen, et al., Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, N.Y., p. 889, 1971). The
parameter is investigated for many solvents. It indicates whether a solvent is
good or poor for a specific polymer. For example, the Hansen parameter of a
good solvent, when plotted in the three-dimensional spatial coordinates of 8d,
Sp
and bh, is distributed in a sphere of certain size. In other words, a solvent
is
considered to be a good one for a specific polymer, when the positions of Sd,
8p
and Sh of the solvent and polymer are sufficiently close to each other in the
three-dimensional coordinates.
Consider a combination of Polymer 1 and Solvent 2, distance ~i between
the polymer and solvent with respect to 8d, 8p and 8h is the square root of A
given by the following formula:
A = (5d2- Shc)z + (Spz-Spl)2 + (6h2-5h1)2
11
CA 02242993 2007-04-25
77486-3
wherein, 8,j1 , bp , and 5,, are the Hansen parameter components of Polymer 1,
and 41, SN.2 and 5,,2 are those of Solvent 2 for the electrolytic solution.
The
Hansen parameter of Polymer 1 is determined empirically, as described earlier.
Solvent 2 is considered to be a good solvent with Polymer 1, when distance y
is
within a certain level. It is known, when the Hansen parameters of various
solvents are plotted to determine whether they are good or poor.with Polymer
1,
that the region surrounded by a good solvent is almost spherical. In other
words, a solvent is considered to be a good one with Polymer 1, when its
Hansen
parameter falls into the hypothetical sphere (with 6d1 , Spl and.Shl as the
centers,
and,/ as the radius), and to be a poor one when its parameter- fall outside of
the
sphere. A solvent can be judged to be good or bad also from S value
(representing volume fraction of the liquid or solvent in unit volume of the
swollen film) determined by the adsorption test.
In the present invention, quantity of one or more monomers for graft
polymerization is adjusted to the Hansen parameter of the solvent for the'
electrolytic solution, in order to effectively swell the solution into gel and
fast
immobilize it. The graft-polymerized polyolefin film selectively includes the
electrolytic solution soluble in the polymer which covers the surfaces of the
microporous polyolefin film and its pores. Swell of the film, however, is
controlled adequately as a whole to prevent its excessive deformation and
decrease in strength, because of high solvent-resistance of polyolefin as the
basic material for the film.
b. Graft Polymerization
Graft polymerization of the above polymer on the surfaces of the
microporous polyolefin film and its pores may be aided by plasma, electron
beams or radioactive ray, such as y ray. Graft polymerization may be post-
polymerizatidn or simultaneous polymerization, where the selected monomer is
12
CA 02242993 1998-07-14
contacted the microporous polyolefin film after the radicals are formed on the
film in the former, and the radicals are formed while the monomer is in
contact
with the film in the latter.
In one example of plasma-aided graft polymerization, the microporous
polyolefin film is treated with a plasma, normally 10 to 30MHz in frequency
and
1 to 1000W in power, for 1 to 1000s in an atmosphere of argon, helium,
nitrogen
or air of 10' to lOmbar in pressure. The plasma-treated film is then placed in
an organic or inorganic solvent in which 1 to 10% by volume of the selected
monomer is dissolved or suspended, for graft polymerization at 20 to 100 C for
1 to 60min with bubbling by nitrogen or argon gas. A cross-linking agent may
be added, as required, to the solvent to 0.01 to 2% by volume. The adequate
solvents include water, alcohol such as methanol, and aqueous alcohol
solutions.
In polymerization aided by electron beams, the microporous polyolefin film,
selected monomer and cross-linking agent may be together irradiated with
electron beams (simultaneous irradiation), or the film may be irradiated with
electron beams before being reacted with the selected monomer in the presence
of cross-linking agent (pre-irradiation), the latter being more preferable
because
of controlled polymerization of the monomer with each other.
In polymerization in the pre-irradiation mode, the microporous polyolefin
film is irradiated with electron beams at an acceleration voltage of 100 to
5000Kev, more preferably 200 to 800Kev. The irradiation may be effected in
air.
Adequate exposure to electron beams is 10 to 500KGy, more preferably 50 to
200KC'~y. An exposure below 10KGy may result in insufficient graft
polymerization of the monomer, whereas that above 500KGy may degrade the
polyolefin film.
The microporous polyolefin film treated with electron beams is then placed
13
CA 02242993 1998-07-14
in the selected monomer solution containing the cross-linking agent for graft
polymerization.
The graft polymerization selectively covers the surfaces of the polyolefin
film
and/or its pores with the polymer. The homopolymer as the by-product of the
graft polymerization may be left or washed out completely by an adequate
solvent, such as toluene, leaving the graft polymer on the surfaces of the
polyolefin film and/or its pores.
c. Degree of Graft Polymerization
Degree of graft polymerization can be controlled by quantity of the radicals
formed, monomer concentration, monomer-radical contact time and
temperature. Degree of graft polymerization, or quantity of the graft
copolymer formed on unit area, is preferably in a range from 0.02 to 35mg/cm2,
more preferably from 0.03 to 30mg/cm2. The effects of the electrolytic
solution
for dissolution and swelling may be insufficient at a degree of graft
polymerization below 0.02mg/cm2, and the polyolefin film may be deformed and
decrease in strength excessively at above 35mg/cm2, depending on thickness of
the polyolefin film. The fine pores in the polyolefin film are gradually
closed as
degree of graft polymerization increases, to reduce porosity of the film, and
eventually closed almost completely.
3. Method to improve affinity of the microporous polyolefin film for the non-
protonic electrolytic solution with the aid of terminal-modified polypropylene
a. Terminal-Modified Polypropylene
Terminal-modified polypropylene is polypropylene with one or more types of
functional groups at its terminals. Such polypropylene includes polymer of
propylene alone, and block-copolymerized rubber from propylene and one or
more types of other a-olefin compounds, such as ethylene, 1-butene, 1-hexane
14
CA 02242993 1998-07-14
and 4-methyl-l-pentene.
Terminal-modified polypropylene can be produced by the following
procedure:
It is produced by reacting living polypropylene, a product of living
polymerization of propylene, with a monomer having one or more types of
functional groups over a catalyst comprising specific vanadium and organic
aluminum compounds.
The preferable vanadium compounds are V(acetyl acetonate), V(2-methyl-
1,3-butanedionate)3 and V(1,3-butanedionate)3. The preferable organic
aluminum compounds are those having a carbon number of 1 to 18, preferably 2
to 6; and mixtures and complexes thereof, such as dialkyl aluminum
monohalides, monoalkyl aluminum dihalides and alkyl aluminum sesquihalides.
Polymerization is preferably effected in an inert solvent which is liquid
under
the polymerization conditions. These solvents include saturated aliphatic,
saturated alicyclic and aromatic hydrocarbons.
Quantity of the catalyst for polymerization of propylene is 1 x 10' to O.
lmols,
more preferably 5 x 10-4 to 5 X 10-2mols, of the vanadium compound, and 1 x 10-
'
to 0.5mols, more preferably 1 X 10-3 to 0.1mols, of the organic aluminum
compound for imol of propylene. It is preferable to control quantity of the
organic aluminum compound at 4 to 100mols for lmol of the vanadium
compound.
The living polymerization is normally effected at -100 to 100 C for 0.5 to
50h.
Molecular weight of living polypropylene produced can be controlled by
controping reaction temperature and time. It is possible to produce polymer
having a molecular weight distribution close to that of the monodisperse
system
by keeping polymerization temperature at a low level, in particular -30 C or
lower. A living polymer close to the monodisperse system, having a Mw
CA 02242993 1998-07-14
(weight-average molecular weight)/Mn (number-average molecular weight)
ratio of 1.05 to 1.40 and a number-average molecular weight of around 800 to
400,000, can be produced when temperature is decreased to -50 C or lower.
Living polypropylene is reacted with a monomer having one or more
functional groups, in order to provide the functional group structure at the
terminals. A monomer similar to that for the graft polymerization is used.
Quantity of the monomer or monomers that constitute the living polymer is
adjusted to the solvent for the electrolytic solution, in order to effectively
swell
the solution into gel and fast immobilize it. The porous thin film containing
the terminal-modified living polymer selectively includes the electrolytic
solution having affinity for the terminal group of the polymer which covers
the
surfaces of the film and its pores. Its swell, however, is controlled
adequately
as a whole to prevent its excessive deformation and decrease in strength,
because of high solvent-resistance of polyethylene as the basic material of
the
film..
For the reaction between living polypropylene and the monomer containing
one or more functional groups, the monomer is supplied to the reaction system
containing living polypropylene. The reaction process is normally effected at -
100 to 150 C for 5min to 50h. Degree of modification at the polypropylene
terminals by the monomer unit can be increased by increasing reaction
temperature or time. In general, quantity of the monomer is set at 1 to
1000mols for lmol of living polypropylene.
Terminal-modified polypropylene thus produced has a number-average
molecular weight (Mn) of around 800 to 500,000, and a very narrow molecular
weight distribution (Mw/Mn = 1.05 to 1.40) characteristic of the living
polymer
itself. It also has 0.1 to 500, preferably 0.5 to 100, terminal structures of
the
monomer on the average at its terminals. The terminal-modified polymer has
16
CA 02242993 1998-07-14
a syndiotactic diad fraction of 0.6 or higher, which is also one of its
characteristics.
b. Method to produce the microporous polyolefin film containing terminal-
modified polypropylene
The microporous polyolefin film containing terminal-modified polypropylene
can be produced by (1) making the film from a composition containing
terminal-modified polypropylene, or (2) by coating the polyolefine film with
terminal-modified polypropylene.
The method (1) is similar to that for producing the microporous polyolefin
film, described earlier.
Quantity of terminal-modified polypropylene is 1 to 50% by weight,
preferably 3 to 30% by weight, of the polyolefin. It exhibits insufficient
effects
of impregnation and immobilization of the solvent for the electrolytic
solution at
below 1% by weight, and excessively degrades mechanical strength of the film
at above 50% by weight.
In the method (2), the microporous polyolefin film produced by the procedure
described in 1-b is coated, by impregnation, spreading or spraying, with
terminal-modified polypropylene dissolved in a solvent, such as aromatic or
paraffinic hydrocarbon, chloroform, or tetrahydrofuran.
4. Method to improve affinity of the microporous polyolefin film for the non-
protonic electrolytic solution with the aid of wax
a. Wax
Wax showing affinity for non-protonic electrolytic solutions includes natural
wax, such as vegetable, animal and mineral wax, and synthetic wax, such as
synthetic hydrocarbons, modified wax, hydrogenated wax, aliphatic acid, acid
amides, esters and ketones. In particular, oil- and fat-based synthetic wax
has
17
CA 02242993 2005-07-18
77486-3
not only affinity for non-protonic electrolytic solutions
but also may show the effect of promoting ion conductance
after forming a complex with the lithium ions. These
synthetic wax types include ester wax, where the ester is
the one represented by [RCOO(CH2CH2)nC00R], ester of
monovalent alcohol and aliphatic acid represented by
[RCOOR], ester of glycerin represented by
[RCOOCH2CH(OH)CH2OH], ester of ethyleneglycol represented by
[RCOOCH2CH2OH] and ester of sorbitan and aliphatic acid.
b. Method to produce the microporous polyolefin film
containing wax
The film of non-protonic electrolyte containing
wax is produced by (1) coating the film with wax, or by (2)
making the film from a wax-containing polyolefin
composition.
Method (1)
The microporous polyolefin film prepared by the
procedure described in 1-b is coated with wax diluted with a
solvent by impregnation, spreading, spraying or a
combination thereof. The suitable diluents include
hydrocarbons such as pentane, hexane, heptane and toluene;
chlorinated hydrocarbons such as carbon tetrachloride;
ethers such as diethyi ether and dioxane; and alcohols such
as methanol and ethanol.
Method (2)
Quantity of wax is 1 to 50% by weight, more
preferably 3 to 30% by weight, of the total resin
composition of wax and ultra-high-molecular-weight
polyolefin itself or its composition with polyolefin.
Impregnation and immobilization of the solvent for the
18
CA 02242993 2005-07-18
77486-3
electrolytic solution are insufficient at below 1% by
weight, and excessive degradation of the film results at
above 50% by weight. The method to produce the microporous
polyolefin film from a wax-containing polyolefin composition
is similar to the procedure described in 1-b.
18a
CA 02242993 2007-04-25
77486-3
5. Method to immobilize the non-protonic electrolytic solution in the
microporous polyolenn film of improved affinity for the non-protonic
electrolytic
solution
a. Electrolytic Solution
The non-protonic electrolytic solutions useful for the present invention
include alkali metal and alkaline-earth metal salts, such as LiF, NaI, LiI,
LiC104, LiAsF6, LiPF6, LiBF4, LiCF3SO3, and NaSCN.
The non-protonic solvents for the non-protonic electrolytic solutions useful
for the present invention are those resistant to alkaline metals and having a
high dielectric constant, such as propylene carbonate, ethylene carbonate, y-
butylolactone, dimethoxyethane, acetonitrile, formamide, tetrahydrofuran and
diethyl ether, either alone or in combination.
Quantity of the electrolytic solution is 70 to 350% by weight, preferably 80
to
250% by weight, of the microporous polyolefin film. Application of the film to
batteries, condensers and electrochromic devices may be limited at below 70%
by weight, because of insufficient interfacial areas with the electrolytic
solution,
and degradation of film strength may result at above 350% by weight.
b. Method for Immobilization of Electrolytic Solution
The non-protonic electrolytic solution can be immobilized to the microporous
polyolefin film to produce the thin film of non-protonic electrolyte by
impregnation, spreading, spraying or a combination thereof. The electrolytic
solution can be immobilized before or during the film is assembled into the
battery, or in the final assembling stage, the last two being more preferable
viewed from handling easiness, prevention of surface wrinkling, adhesion to
the
anode and cathode, and applicability of the existing battery assembling line.
The thin film of non-protonic electrolyte with the electrolytic solution
immobilized in the microporous polyolefin film is free from the problems
19
CA 02242993 2008-01-18
77486-3
resulting from liquid leakage and is made more incombustible because of much
reduced vapor pressure of the solution, since the solution is immobilized by
capillary phenomenon and swelling as it dissolves the graft polymer.
The immobilized electrolytic solution is similar to the solution in ion
conductivity, and can be handled over a wide temperature range.
B. Electrolyte-Immobilized Liquid-Film Conductor
The electrolyte-immobilized liquid-film conductor of the present invention
can be produced by immobilizing a non-protonic electrolytic solution in the
microporous polyolefin film containing a substance showing affinity for
electronic conductors and non-protonic electrolytic solutions. Such a
polyolefin
flm can be produced by graft polymerization to attach a substance showing
affinity for non-protonic electrolytic solutions to the microporous polyolefin
film
prepared from a composition containing an electron-conductive substance, by
making the film from a composition of polyolefin containing an electron-
conductive substance and a substance showing affinity for non-protonic
electrolytic solutions, or by coating the film with a substance showing
affinity
for non-protonic electrolytic solutions, to immobilize the non-protonic
electrolytic solution in the microporous film. These procedures, where one of
the electron-conductive substances described below is mixed with polyolefin,
are
similar to that for the thin film of non-protonic electrolyte.
a. Electron-Conductive Substances
The electron-conductive substances useful for the present invention are a
variety, of metals and semiconductors, oxides and sulfides, and carbon and
graphite. They may be granular, fibrous, fibril or whisker. These.include
cathode-active substances, such as TiS3i TiS2, TiO9VZ05, NbS.ei3, Mn021
LiCo02i LiNin2, LiMn20a, Pb02 and NiOOH; anode-active substances,
CA 02242993 2007-04-25
77486-3
such as petroleum coke, natural graphite, carbon fiber, Pb and Cd; and
conductive substances, such as acetylene black, Ketjenblack (trade mark of
Akzo Chemicals), carbon whisker, graphite whisker and graphite fibrils.
Quantity of the electron-conductive substance is 1 to 200% by weight, more
preferably 5 to 100% by weight, of polyolefin used. Conductivity is
insufficient
at below 1% by weight, and practically sufficient film strength may not be
secured at above 200% by weight.
b. Conductivity of Electrolyte-Immobilized Liquid-Film Conductor
The electrolyte-immobilized liquid-film conductor of the present invention
should have a conductivity of 10'S/cm or higher, more preferably 10"S/cm or
higher. Effective resistance of the conductor is impractically high at a
conductivity below 10-jS/cm. For example, effective resistance of the l m
thick
film is 1 m/104C/cm, or lOS2cm2.
C. Polymer Battery
The thin film of non-protonic electrolyte as the gelled electrolyte can be
used
for the polymer battery of the present invention together with the
conventional
types of anode and cathode. In particular, the thin film of non-protonic
electrolyte gives a safer and more economical polymer battery than the
conventional one, when combined with at least one of the anode-immobilized
liquid-film conductor containing an anode-activating substance as the electron-
conductive substance and the cathode-immobilized liquid-film conductor
containing a cathode-activating substance as the electron-conductive
substance.
The conductive thin film or electrolyte-immobilized liquid-film conductor of
the present invention gives, together with light, flexible electrodes, the
polymer
battery, in which the solvent for the electrolytic solution is immobilized by
solubility of the polymer, excessive swelling is controlled by polyolefin as
the
21
CA 02242993 1998-07-14
structural material for the porous film, the solvent for the electrolytic
solution
can be held stably over a wide temperature range, evaporation of the solvent
for
the electrolytic solution is well controlled, and good conductivity is kept
over a
wide temperature range. In other words, the polymer battery has improved
safety with respect to overcharge without excessively decreasing electron-
conductivity.
The polymer battery of the present invention discharges electricity more
efficiently than the conventional liquid-electrolyte lithium battery, because
of
the presence of organic electrolytic in the pores in the lithium ion
conductive
polymer film, which allows the lithium ions to pass not only through the
electrolytic solution but also through the polymer electrolyte. Moreover, the
electrolytic solution in the pores in the porous polymer electrolyte secures
diffusion passages for the ions, which allows the battery to discharge
electricity
more efficiently than the conventional polymer-electrolyte lithium battery.
Coating the interfaces between the electrolyte and electrodes partly or
totally with a porous, lithium ion conductive polymer reduces
oxidation/reduction of the organic electrolytic solution by the anode and
cathode,
which is one of the major problems involved in high-voltage batteries, and
hence
improves the charge/discharge characteristics. In such a case, the lithium ion
conductive polymer can secure efficient discharge.
PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
The present invention is described more concretely by the following
preferred embodiments, which by no means limit the present invention. The
properties cited in the preferred embodiments were determined by the following
test methods:
(1) Film thickness: Scanning electron microscopic analysis of the film
sections
22
CA 02242993 2007-04-25
77486-3
(2) Average pore size: Analysis by Omnisorp 360 (Nikkiso)
(3) Porosity: Analysis by weight
(4) Tensile strength: Analysis in compliance to ASTM D882
EXAMPLE 1
A microporous polyethylene film (weight-average molecular weight: 1 X 106,
molecular weight distribution: 20, film thickness: 25 m, average pore size:
0.03 m, porosity: 43.5%, tensile strength: 1049kg/cm2) was irradiated with a
plasma of 0.lmbar and lOW for 60s in an argon atmosphere, and contacted a
methyl acrylate solution (monomer content: 4% by volume, solvent: water) at
30 C for 0.1, 15 and 1000min for graft polymerization. The effluent was
washed with toluene and dried at 50 C in an oven, to prepare microporous
polyethylene films (Samples A, B and C). Their degrees of graft polymerization
were 0.02, 2.3 and 34mg/cm', determined from weight changes before and after
polymerization. Their tensile strength levels were 985, 995 and 190kg/cm2
.
EXAMPLE 2
A microporous polyethylene film (Sample D) was prepared in the same
manner as in EX.~.41VEPLE 1, except that the film was contacted a butyl
acrylate
emulsion (monomer content: 10% by volume, solvent: water containing sodium
dodecyl benzene sulfonate) at 30 C for 60min for graft polymerization. It had
2 0 a degree of graft polymerization of 1.5mg/cm2 and tensile strength of
940kg/cm'.
EXAMPLE 3
A microporous polyethylene film (Sample E) was prepared in the same
manner as in EX-AIVIPLE 1, except that the film was contacted a 2-ethvlhexyl
acrylate emulsion (monomer content: 10% by volume, solvent: water containing
*Trade-mark
23
CA 02242993 1998-07-14
sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate) at 30 C for 30min for graft polymerization.
It had a degree of graft polymerization of 2.6mg/cm2 and tensile strength of
1035kg/cm'.
EXAMPLE 4
The microporous polyethylene films prepared by EXAMPLES 1 through 3
(Samples B, D and E), 10cm square in size, were placed in y-butylolactone,
tetrahydrofuran and diethyl ether, kept at 25 C, for lh. Temporal film weight
change was measured, immediately after the liquid attaching to the film was
removed, for each sample to determine its weight gain by extrapolating the
data
to time zero. The results are given in Table 1. The temporal weight change in
lh, relative to the weight at time zero, was also measured for each sample
allowed to stand in air at 25 C. The results are given in Table 1 or 2.
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 1
The microporous polyethylene film (the same one as in EXAMPLE 1), 10cm
square in size, was placed in y-butylolactone, tetrahydrofuran and diethyl
ether, kept at 25 C, for lh. Its weight gain is given in Table 1. The temporal
weight change in lh, relative to the weight at time zero, was also measured
for
each sample allowed to stand in air at 25 C. The results are given in Table 2.
EXAMPLE 5
The microporous polyethylene films prepared by EXAMPLES 1(Samples A,
B and C), 10cm square in size, were placed in v-butylolactone containing 1%
by mol of LiBF4, kept at 25 C, for lh to prepare a thin film of non-protonic
electrolyte .
Each thin film was cut into a sphere of 10mm in diameter and sandwiched
24
CA 02242993 1998-07-14
by platinum black electrodes, to measure its electrical resistance with AC
(frequency: 1kHz). Its ion conductivity was determined from the resistance
level, and thickness and area of the thin film. The results are given in Table
3.
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 2
The microporous polyethylene film (the same one as in EXAMPLE 1), 10cm
square in size, was placed in y-butylolactone, kept at 25 C, for lh, to
measure
its electrical resistance and ion conductivity by the same procedures as in
EXAMPLE 5. The results are given in Table 3.
Table 1
Weight gain extrapolated to time zero
y -butylolactone tetrahydrofuran diethyl ether
Sample B 72% 66% 42%
Sample D 67% 66% 60%
Sample E 62% 61% 68%
Sample by 49% 38% 31%
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 1
Table 2
Weight loss in lh in air
y -butylolactone tetrahydrofuran diethyl ether
Sample B <0.5% <1.0% 2.5%
Sample D <0.5% <1.0% 1.5%
Sample E <0.5% <1.0% 1.0%
Sample by 2.5% 37.5% 31.0%
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 1
CA 02242993 1998-07-14
Table 3
Weight gain Weight loss
Extrapolated to time zero lh in air Ion conductivity
Sample A 47% 2.0% 7.0x 10'[S/cm]
Sample B 72% <0.5% 7.1 x 10-3 [S/cm]
Sample C 91% <0.5% 7.1 x 10"[S/cm]
Sample by 49% 2.5% 6.8 x 10-" [S/cm]
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 1
It is considered that the thin film of non-protonic electrolyte of the present
invention stably holds the electrolytic solution, because it is immobilized
more
effectively in the microporous polyethylene film having closer Hansen
parameter components; these components of the electrolytic solution solvents
in
the three-dimensional coordinates are (18.6, 12.2 and 14.0) [MPa -5] for y-
butylolactone, (13.3, 11.0 and 6.7) [MPa -g] for tetrahydrofuran and (13.4,
4.5
and 5.6) [MPa0-5] for diethyl ether, and those of the microporous polyethylene
films treated by graft polymerization are (13.2, 10.2 and 9.4) [MPa .5],
(14.0, 8.3
and 6.8) [MPa0-5] and (13.9, 6.8 and 4.5) [MPa .5] for those treated with
methyl
acrylate, butyl acrylate and 2-ethylhexyl acrylate.
EXAMPLE 6
A mixture consisting of 5% of ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene
having a weight-average molecular weight of 2 X 106, 20% of high-density
polyethylene having a weight-average molecular weight of 4 X 10', 5% of living-
polymerized polypropylene having a weight-average molecular weight of
50,000 and methyl acrylate group at the terminals, and 70% of liquid paraffin
having a viscosity of 64cst at 40 C was kneaded under heat by a batch biaxial
26
CA 02242993 1998-07-14
extruder, after having been added with 0.375 parts of oxidation inhibitor on
100
parts of the polyolefin composition, where all percentages and parts are by
weight.
The mixture, extruded out of the mold with a rectangular mouth piece, was
rolled by a chill roll kept at 30 C into a 0.5mm thick sheet. The sheet was
drawn in longitudinal and transverse directions simultaneously by a biaxial
drawer at 115 C and an area draw ratio of 5 X 5, washed with n-hexane to
remove
residual liquid paraffin, dried at 120 C while it was set in the mold, and
thermally set to prepare a microporous, thin film of polyethylene.
The thin film (thickness: 25 m, porosity: 38.5%, tensile strength: 875kg/cm2),
cut into a 10cm square shape, was placed in a v-butylolactone solution
containing lmol% of LiBF4, kept at 25 C, for lh to prepare the thin film of
non-
protonic electrolyte. Temporal film weight change was measured, immediately
after the liquid attaching to the film was removed, to determine its weight
gain
by extrapolating the data to time zero. It was 65%. The temporal weight loss
in lh, relative to the weight at time zero, was also measured for the film
allowed
to stand in air at 25 C. It was 0.5% or less.
The thin film was cut into a sphere of 10mm in diameter and sandwiched by
platinum black electrodes, to measure its electrical resistance with AC
(frequency: 1kHz). It had an ion conductivity of 7 X 10-'S/cm, as determined
from the resistance level, and thickness and area of the thin film.
EXAMPLE 7
A mixture consisting of 6% of ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene
having a weight-average molecular weight of 2.5 X 106, 24% of high-density
polyethylene having a weight-average molecular weight of 3.5 X 105 and 70% of
liquid paraffin having a viscosity of 64cst at 40 C was kneaded under heat by
a
27
CA 02242993 1998-07-14
biaxial extruder, after having been added with 0.375 parts of oxidation
inhibitor
on 100 parts of the polyolefin composition, where all percentages and parts
are
by weight.
The mixture, extruded out of the mold with a rectangular mouth piece, was
rolled by a chill roll kept at 309C into a 0.5mm thick sheet. The sheet was
drawn in longitudinal and transverse directions simultaneously by a batch
biaxial drawer at 115 C and an area draw ratio of 5 x 5, washed with n-hexane
to remove residual liquid paraffin, dried at 120 C while it was set in the
mold, and thermally set to prepare a microporous, thin film of polyethylene
(thickness: 25 m, porosity: 43.5%, tensile strength: 1049kg/cm2, average pore
size:'0.03 m).
The thin film was placed in a tetrahydrofuran solution containing 10% by
weight of living-polymerized polypropylene with methacrylate group at the
terminals for lh, and dried by wind for 24h. The living polymer was added to
the thin film to 14% by weight.
Then, 0.lcc of a v-butylolactone solution containing lmol% of LiBF.1 kept at
25 C, was added drop by drop onto the treated thin film, cut into a 10cm
square
shape, and the thin film was allowed to stand in a closed vessel for lh to
prepare
the thin film of non-protonic electrolyte. Temporal film weight change was
measured, immediately after the liquid attaching to the film was removed, to
determine its weight gain by extrapolating the data to time zero. It was 56%.
The temporal weight loss in lh, relative to the weight at time zero, was also
measured for the film allowed to stand in air at 25 C. It was 0.5% or less.
The thin film was cut into a sphere of 10mm in diameter and sandwiched by
platinum black electrodes, to measure its electrical resistance with AC
(frequency: 1kHz). It had an ion conductivity of 7 X 10-3S/cm, as determined
from the resistance level, and thickness and area of the thin film.
28
CA 02242993 1998-07-14
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 3
A microporous polyethylene film (film thickness: 25 m, porosity: 43.5%,
tensile strength: 1049kg/cm2) was prepared in the same manner as in
EXAMPLE 6 except that terminal-modified polypropylene was not used. It
was cut into a 10cm square shape, and placed in a v-butylolactone solution
containing lmol% of LiBF4, kept at 25 C, for lh to prepare the thin film of
non-
protonic electrolyte. Temporal film weight change was measured, immediately
after the liquid attaching to the film was removed, to determine its weight
gain
by extrapolating the data to time zero. It was 45%. The temporal weight loss
in 11i, relative to the weight at time zero, was also measured for the film
allowed
to stand in air at 25 C. It was 2.5%.
The thin film of non-protonic electrolyte was cut into a sphere of 10mm in
diameter and sandwiched by platinum black electrodes, to measure its
electrical
resistance with AC (frequency: 1kHz). It had an ion conductivity of 7 X 10-
3S/cm, as determined from the resistance level, and thickness and area of the
thin film.
EXAMPLE 8
A microporous polyethylene film (weight-average molecular weight: 1.1 X 106,
molecular weight distribution: 20, thickness: 25 m, average pore size: 0.03 m,
porosity: 43.5%, tensile strength: 1049kg/cm2) was spread with octadecyl
stearate diluted with methylene chloride to 15% by weight, and was allowed to
stand at room temperature for 24h for drying, to prepare the composite film
containing 49% by weight of octadecyl stearate.
A small quantity of a propylene carbonate solution containing lmol% of
LiPF6~ , kept at 25 C, was added drop by drop onto the coated thin film, 10cm
29
CA 02242993 1998-07-14
square in size, and the thin film was allowed to stand in a closed vessel for
lh.
The thin film of non-protonic electrolyte thus prepared had a swell (weight
gain)
of 98%.
The thin film was cut into a sphere of 10mm in diameter and sandwiched by
platinum black electrodes, to measure its electrical resistance with AC
(frequency: 1kHz). It had an ion conductivity of 5 x 10-3S/cm, as determined
from the resistance level, and thickness and area of the thin film.
EXAMPLE 9
A mixture consisting of 5 parts of octadecyl stearate, 5 parts of ultra-high-
molecular-weight polyethylene having a weight-average molecular weight of 2
x 106, 20 parts of high-density polyethylene having a weight-average molecular
weight of 4 x 105, and 70% of liquid paraffin having a viscosity of 64cst at
40 C
was kneaded under heat by a biaxial extruder, after having been added with
0.125 parts of 2,6-di-t-butyl-p-cresol and 0.25 parts of tetrakis[methylene-3-
(3,5-di-t-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)propionate]methane as the oxidation inhibitors
on 100 parts of the mixture, where all parts are by weight. The mixture,
extruded out of the mold with a rectangular mouth piece, was rolled by a chill
roll kept at 30 C into a 0.5mm thick sheet. The sheet was drawn in
longitudinal and transverse directions simultaneously by a batch biaxial
drawer at 110 C and an area draw ratio of 5X5, washed with n-hexane to
remove residual liquid paraffin, dried at 1159C while it was set in the mold,
and
thermally set to prepare a microporous, thin film of polyethylene containing
octadecyl stearate.
The composite thin film, cut into a 10cm square shape, was placed in a
propylene carbonate solution containing lmol% of LiPF6, kept at 25 C, for lh
to
prepare the thin film of non-protonic electrolyte. It had a swell (weight
gain) of
CA 02242993 2007-04-25
77486-3
125%.
The composite thin film was cut into a sphere of 10mm in diameter and
sandwiched by platinum black electrodes, to measure its electrical resistance
with AC (frequency: 1kHz). It had an ion conductivity of 1 X 10'lS/cm, as
determined from the resistance level, and thickness and area of the thin film.
EXAMPLE 10.
A mixture consisting of 5 parts of ester wax (VPCSnew, trade mark of
HOECHST), 5 parts of ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene having a
weight-average molecular weight of 2 x 106, 20 parts of high-density
polyethylene having a weight-average molecular weight of 4 x 10', and 70% of
liquid paraffin having a viscosity of 64cst at 40 C was kneaded under heat by
a
biaxial extruder, after having been added with 0.125 parts of 2,6-di-t-butyl-p-
cresol and 0.25 parts of tetrakis[methylene-3-(3,5-di-t-butyl-4-
hydroxyphenyl)propionate]methane as the oxidation inhibitors on 100 parts of
the mixture, where all parts are by weight. The mixture, extruded out of the
mold with a rectangular mouth piece, was rolled by a chill roll kept at 30 C
into
a 0.5mm thick sheet. The sheet was drawn in longitudinal and transverse
directions simultaneously by a batch biaxial drawer at 110 C and an area draw
ratio of 5 x 5, washed with n-hexane to remove residual liquid paraf~.n, dried
at
115 C while it was set in the mold, and thermally set to prepare a
microporous,
thin film of polyethylene containing ester wax.
The composite thin film, cut into a 10cm square shape, was placed in a
propylene carbonate solution containing lmol% of LiPF6, kept at 25 C, for lh
to
prepare the thin film of non-protonic electrolyte. It had a swell (weight
gain) of
105%.
The composite thin film was cut into a sphere of 10mm in diameter and
31
CA 02242993 2007-04-25
77486-3
sandwiched by platinum black electrodes, to measure its electrical resistance
with AC (frequency: 1kHz). It had an ion conductivity of 9 x 10-"S/cm, as
determined from the resistance level, and thickness and area of the thin film.
COMPARA.TIVE EXAMPLE 4
A microporous polyethylene film, prepared in the same manner as in
EYANII.'LE 8 except that it was not coated with octadecyl stearate, was placed
in a propylene carbonate solution containing lmol% of LiPFs, kept at 25 C,
after
having been cut into a 10cm square shape, to prepare the thin film of non-
protonic electrolyte. The thin film had a swell (weight gain) of 72.5%.
The thin film was cut into a sphere of 10mm in diameter and sandwiched by
platinum black electrodes, to measure its electrical resistance with AC
(frequency: IkHz). It had an ion conductivity of 3 X 10"3S/cm, as determined
from the resistance level, and thickness and area of the thin film.
EXAMPLE 11
A mixture consisting of 5 parts of ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene
having a weight-average molecular weight of 2 x 106, 20 parts of high-density
polyethylene having a weight-average molecular weight of 4 x 105, 5 parts of
living-polymerized polypropylene having methyl acrylate group at both
terminals and a weight-average molecular weight of 5 x 10', 30 parts of
petroleum coke powder, 3 parts of Ketjenblack (trade mark of Akzo Chemicals)
powder, and 70% of liquid paraflin was kneaded under heat by a batch biaxial
extruder, after having been added with 0.37 parts of an oxidation inhibitor on
100 parts of the mixture, where all parts are by weight. The mixture, extruded
out of the mold with a rectangular mouth piece, was rolled by a chill roll
into a
lmm thick 5heet. The sheet was drawn in longitudinal and transverse
32
CA 02242993 2007-04-25
77486-3
directions simultaneously by a biaxial drawer at 120 C and an area draw ratio
of 5 X 5, washed with n-hexane to remove residual liquid paraffin, dried at
120 C
while it was set in the mold, and thermally set to prepare a microporous, thin
film of polyethylene containing the electron conductive substances and
terminal-modified polypropylene.
The thin film (thickness: 25 u m) was placed in a propylene carbonate
solution containing lmol% of LiPFs, kept at 25C, for lh to prepare the
electrolyte-immobilized liquid-film conductor. It had a swell (weight gain) of
103%.
The conductor was cut into a sphere of 10mm in diameter and sandwiched
by platinum black electrodes, to measure its electrical resistance with AC
(frequency: 1k.Hz). It had a conductivity of 8 X 10'2S/cm, as determined from
the resistance level, and thickness and area of the conductor.
EXAMPLE 12
A mixture consisting of 5 parts of ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene
having a weight-average molecular weight of 2 X 106, 25 parts of high-density
polyethylene having a weight-average molecular weight of 4 x 10j, 30 parts of
petroleum coke powder, 3 parts of Ketjenblack (trade mark of A.kzo Chemicals)
powder, and 70% of liquid paraffin was kneaded under heat by a batch biaxial
extruder, after having been added with 0.37 parts of an oxidation inhibitor on
100 parts of the mixture, where all parts are by weight. The mixture, extruded
out of the mold with a rectangular mouth piece, was rolled by a chill roll
into a
1mm thick sheet. The sheet was drawn in longitudinal and transverse
directions simultaneously by a biaxial drawer at 120 C and an area draw ratio
of 5 x 5, washed with n-hexane to remove residual liquid paraffin, dried at
120 C
while it was 'set in the mold, and thermally set to prepare a polyethylene
film
33
CA 02242993 1998-07-14
containing the electron conductive substances.
The film (thickness: 30 m) was spread with living-polymerized
polypropylene having a weight-average molecular weight of 5 X 10', methyl
acrylate group at both terminals and diluted with methylene chloride to 15% by
weight, and was allowed to stand at room temperature for 24h for drying, to
prepare the thin, microporous film of polyolefin containing 46% by weight of
living-polymerized polypropylene.
Then, 0.1cc of a propylene carbonate solution containing lmol% of
LiPF6,kept at 25 C, was added drop by drop onto the treated thin film, cut
into a
10cm square shape, and the thin film was allowed to stand in a closed vessel
for
lh to prepare the electrolyte-immobilized liquid-film conductor. It had a
swell
(weight gain) of 95%.
The conductor was cut into a sphere of 10mm in diameter and sandwiched
by platinum black electrodes, to measure its electrical resistance with AC
(frequency: 1kHz). It had a conductivity of 7 X 10-2S/cm, as determined from
the resistance level, and thickness and area of the conductor.
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 5
A microporous polyethylene film, prepared in the same manner as in
EXAMPLE 12 except that it was not spread with living-polymerized
polypropylene, was placed in a propylene carbonate solution containing
lmol% of LiPFs, kept at 25 C, to prepare the electrolyte-immobilized liquid-
film
conductor. It had a swell (weight gain) of 81.5%.
The conductor was cut into a sphere of 10mm in diameter and sandwiched by
platinum black electrodes, to measure its electrical resistance with AC
(frequency: 1kHz). It had a conductivity of 4 X 10-'S/cm, as determined from
34
CA 02242993 2007-04-25
77486-3
the resistance level, and thickness and area of the conductor.
EY,A-NIPLE 13
Methyl acrylate was graft-polymerized with a microporous polyethylene film
(weight-average molecular weight: 1 X 106, molecular weight distribution: 20,
film thickness: 25 u m, porosity: 40%, tensile strength: 1049kg/cm2), where
the
film was irradiated with a plasma of lOW for 60s in an argon atmosphere at
0.lmbar, and contacted a methyl acrylate solution (monomer content: 4% by
volume, solvent: water) at 30 C for 15min for graft polymerization. The
effluent was washed with toluene and dried at 50 C in an oven. Its degrees of
graft polymerization was 3.9mg/cm2, determined from the weight change before
and after polymerization. The graft-polymerized, microporous polyethylene
film, cut into a 10cm square shape, was placed in a propylene carbonate
solution
containing lmol% of LiPF6, kept at 25 C, for lh to prepare the thin film of
non-
protonic electrolyte. It had a swell (weight gain) of 134%.
A mixture consisting of 10% of polyethylene having a weight-average
molecular weight of 4.0 X 10j, 2 parts of polyethylene having a weight-average
molecular weight of 2.0 X 106, 15 parts of petroleum coke powder, 3 parts of
KetjenblacZ powder, and 70% of liquid paraffin was kneaded under heat by a
biaxial extruder, after having been added with 0.37 parts of an oxidation
inhibitor on 100 parts of the mixture, where all parts are by weight. The
mixture, extruded out of the mold with a rectangular mouth piece, was rolled
by
a chill roll into a lmm thick sheet. The sheet was drawn in longitudinal and
transverse directions simultaneously by a batch biaxial drawer at 120 C and an
area draw ratio of 5 x 5, washed with n-hexane to remove residual liquid
paraffin, dried at 120 C while it was set in the mold, and thermally set to
prepare a polyethylene film containing the electron conductive substances.
*Trade-mark
CA 02242993 1998-07-14
Methyl acrylate was graft-polymerized with the polyethylene film containing
the electron conductive substances (film thickness: 30 ,cc m), where the film
was
irradiated with a plasma of lOW for 60s in an argon atmosphere at O.lmbar,
and contacted a methyl acrylate solution (monomer content: 4% by volume,
solvent: water) at 30 C for 15min for graft polymerization. The effluent was
washed with toluene and dried at 50 C in an oven, to produce the graft-
polymerized polyethylene film containing the electron conductive substances.
Its degrees of graft polymerization was 2.5mg/cm2, determined from the weight
change before and after polymerization. The graft-polymerized, microporous
polyethylene film was placed in a propylene carbonate solution containing
lmol'% of LiPF6, kept at 25 C, for lh to prepare the cathode-immobilized
liquid-
film conductor. It had a swell (weight gain) of 126%.
Similarly, a mixture consisting of 10% of polyethylene having a weight-
average molecular weight of 4.0 X 105, 2 parts of polyethylene having a weight-
average molecular weight of 2.0 X 106, 15 parts of LiMn2O5, 3 parts of Ketjen
powder, and 70% of liquid paraffin was kneaded under heat by a biaxial
extruder, after having been added with 0.37 parts of an oxidation inhibitor on
100 parts of the mixture, where all parts are by weight. The mixture, extruded
out of the mold with a rectangular mouth piece, was rolled by a chill roll
into a
lmm thick sheet. The sheet was drawn in longitudinal and transverse
directions simultaneously by a batch biaxial drawer at 1209C and an area draw
ratio of 5 X 5, washed with n-hexane to remove residual liquid paraffin, dried
at
120 C while it was set in the mold, and thermally set to prepare a
polyethylene
film containing the electron conductive substances. Methyl acrylate was
graft-polymerized with the polyethylene film containing the electron
conductive
substances (film thickness: 30 m), where the film was irradiated with a plasma
of lOW for 60s in an argon atmosphere at 0.lmbar, and contacted a methyl
36
CA 02242993 1998-07-14
acrylate solution (monomer content: 4% by volume, solvent: water) at 30 C for
15min for graft polymerization. The effluent was washed with toluene and
dried at 50 C in an oven, to produce the graft-polymerized polyethylene film
containing the electron conductive substances. Its degrees of graft
polymerization was 3.1mg/cm2, determined from the weight change before and
after polymerization. The graft-polymerized, microporous polyethylene film
was placed in a propylene carbonate solution containing 1M of LiPF,;, kept at
25 C, for lh to prepare the anode-immobilized liquid-film conductor. It had a
swell (weight gain) of 126%.
The thin film of non-protonic electrolyte (thickness: 49 m, 42 by 33mm) was
placed between the cathode-immobilized liquid-film conductor (thickness: 57 m,
40 by 30mm) and the anode-immobilized liquid-film conductor (thickness: 51 m,
40 by 30mm). The laminated body was sandwiched by metallic plates, and its
ends were sealed. The assembly thus prepared had a capacity of around
400mAh at a discharge of 2mA. No degradation in capacity was observed
during 50 charge/discharge cycles.
INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY
The thin film of non-protonic electrolyte of the present invention uses a
graft-polymerized microporous polyolefin film as the substrate, and well
dissolves and holds the solvent for the electrolyte. The thin film shows
particularly high mechanical strength and durability, when a ultra-high-
molecular-weight polyethylene is used as one of the polyethylene components.
The graft polymer closes the fine pores of the microporous polyolefin film, at
least partly and essentially totally, and the film can selectively include and
immobilize the solvent for the electrolyte which has affinity for the graft
polymer.
37
CA 02242993 1998-07-14
The microporous thin olefin film containing living polypropylene with
functional groups at the terminals and that containing wax have improve
affinity for the electrolytic solution to immobilize it, and are prevented
from
being excessively swollen, because of resistance of polyolefin as the basic
material for the film to the solvent. As a result, they can stably hold the
electrolytic solution and keep evaporation of the solvent at a very low level
over
a wide temperature range. Ionic conductivity of the film can be easily
controlled for a specific purpose by properly selecting type and length of the
functional group to be introduced. Therefore, it is efficiently protected from
overcharge, without excessively decreasing ionic conductivity. The thin film
can find wide use in the areas which need low film resistance and high
mechanical strength, such as membranes for facilitated transport,
electrochromic devices and sensors. It is particularly applicable to primary
and secondary batteries and condensers which use non-protonic electrolytic
solutions, in particular lithium-based primary and secondary batteries. It is
also useful as the solid-state polymer electrolyte for lithium-based secondary
batteries.
The electrolyte-immobilized liquid-film conductor of the present invention
immobilizes the electrolytic solution by the action of the polymer introduced
into the electrically conductive, microporous polyolefin film. It can stably
hold
the electrolytic solution over a wide temperature range, because it is
prevented
from being excessively swollen by virtue of resistance of polyolefin as the
basic
material for the film to the solvent, keep evaporation of the solvent at a
very low
level, and show good conductivity over a wide temperature range. Therefore, it
is efficiently protected from overcharge, without excessively decreasing ionic
conductivity. The conductor has a high mechanical strength by virtue of the
skeleton of polyolefin, and can be produced by the existing battery production
38
CA 02242993 1998-07-14
line, essentially without changing it. The conductor, having conductivity both
for ions and electrons, can be used for electrodes for various devices, such
as
batteries of liquid-state electrolytes, electrochromic devices, electrical
double
layer condensers and liquid crystal devices, and also for devices, such as
anti-
static devices, electromagnetic wave shielding devices, electricallv
conductive
paints, adhesives, IC packing materials, heating sheets, and primary and
secondary batteries of planar switches.
The polymer battery of the present invention allows the lithium ions to pass
not only through the electrolytic solution but also through the polymer
electrolyte, thus discharging electricity more efficiently than the
conventional
lithium battery of liquid-state electrolyte. The electrolytic solution in the
pores
in the polymer electrolyte secures diffusional passages for the ions, making
the
polymer battery of the present invention more advantageous over the
conventional lithium battery of polymer electrolyte in various aspects, such
as
higher discharging function at low temperature, lesser self-discharge at high
temperature, and higher charge/discharge characteristics over extended
periods.
Coating the interfaces between the electrolyte and electrodes partly or
totally with a porous, lithium ion conductive polymer reduces
oxidation/reduction of the organic electrolytic solution by the anode and
cathode,
which is one of the major problems involved in high-voltage batteries, and
hence
improves the charge/discharge characteristics.
324
