Language selection

Search

Patent 2244580 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2244580
(54) English Title: NEW METHOD FOR THE CONTROL OF FLEA BEETLES IN CANOLA
(54) French Title: NOUVELLE METHODE DE LUTTE CONTRE LA PUCE DE TERRE DANS LA CULTURE DU CANOLA
Status: Term Expired - Post Grant Beyond Limit
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • A01N 43/40 (2006.01)
  • A01C 1/06 (2006.01)
  • A01C 1/08 (2006.01)
  • A01N 47/40 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • KLITTICH, CARLA JEAN (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • NIPPON SODA
(71) Applicants :
  • RHONE-POULENC INC. (United States of America)
(74) Agent: MACRAE & CO.
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2007-04-03
(22) Filed Date: 1998-08-04
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 2000-02-04
Examination requested: 2003-07-29
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data: None

Abstracts

English Abstract

A method of protecting a plant susceptible to attack by a Phylotxeta spp. insect from said attack which comprises applying to the seed from which the plant grows an effective amount of a chloronicotinyl insecticide or a salt thereof, which insecticide is other than imidacloprid and thiamethoxam.


French Abstract

Une méthode de protection d'une plante sensible aux attaques d'un insecte Phylotxeta spp. de ladite attaque, ladite méthode comprenant l'application à la graine dont pousse la plante d'une quantité efficace d'un insecticide chloronicotinyl ou d'un sel de celui-ci, lequel insecticide étant autre que l'imidaclopride et le thiaméthoxame.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


-4-
CLAIMS:
1. A method of protecting a plant susceptible to attack by a Phyllotreta spp.
insect
from said attack which comprises applying to the seed from which the plant
grows an
effective amount of a chloronicotinyl insecticide or a salt thereof, which
insecticide is other
than imidacloprid and thiaxamethoxam.
2. The method according to Claim 1 wherein the plant is a Brassiea spp. plant.
3. The method according to Claim 2 wherein the Brassiea spp. plant is selected
from
the group consisting of Brassica napus, Brassica raps, and Brassica juncea.
4. The method according to Claim 1, 2 or 3 wherein the Phyllotreta spp. is
Phyllotreta
cruciferae.
5. The method according to any one of Claims 1-4 wherein the plant cotyledon
has
expanded.
6. The method according to any one of Claims 1-3 wherein the plant is
protected from
the time of emergence from the seed from which it grows to flowering of the
plant.
7. The method according any one of Claims 1-6 wherein the plant is at a growth
stage
of from the expansion of the plant cotyledon to the sixth true leaf.
8. The method according to any one of Claims 1-7 wherein the insecticide is
applied
to the seed in an amount of from 0.1 g per kg of seed to 20 g per kg of seed.
9. The method according to any one of Claims 1-7 wherein the insecticide is
applied
to the seed in an amount of from 1 g per kg of seed to 10 g per kg of seed.

-5-
10. The method according to any one of Claims 1-7 wherein the insecticide is
applied
to the seed in an amount of from 2.5 g per kg of seed to 7.5 g per kg of seed.
11. The method according to any one of Claims 1-10 wherein the insecticide is
(E)-N1-[(6-chloro-3-pyridyl)methyl]-N2-cyano-N1-methylacetamidine.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02244580 1998-08-04
New Method for the Control of Flea Beetles in Canola
The present invention relates to a new method fox the control of flea beetles
in
plants.
At the present tune, there exists a need to protect plants from infestation
and
damage by flea beetles. This particular problem exists in portions of the
North
American continent where canola is raised for the value of its oil. At present
there is
no one-stage chemical treatment effective to protect canola from the damage
that is
done by flea beetles. In fact, a generally accepted method comprises treating
canola
seed with lindane (a mixture of 1,2,3,4,5,6-hexachlorocyclohexanes), combining
with
granular terbufos (S-tert-butylthiomethyl O,O-diethyl phosphorodithioate) and
then
planting the seed/pesticide cotnpositiozt. It is generally known that lindane
and other
chlorinated hydrocarbon iuasecticides (as well as organophosphates )are being
removed
from agrochemical markets on a worldwide basis due their generally
unacceptable
persistency in the soil or acute toxicity to mammals. Thus there exists a need
for an
improved treatment of canola from flea beetle attack.
An object of the present invention is to provide a new insecticidal treatment
of
canola seed.
Another object of the preseat invention is to provide a one-stage or one-step
treatment of canoia for protection from flea beetle
Another object of the present invention is to provide a treatment of canola
seed
that is more environmentally acceptable thazt the state of the an.
Another object of the invention is to provide a treatment of canola seed that
is
superior to those in the state of the art.
These objects are roet in whole or in part by the present invention.
The present invention provides a method of protecting a plant susceptible to
attack by a Phylotreta spp. insect from said attack which comprises applying
to the
seed from which the plant grows an effective amount of a chloronicotinyl
insecticide
or a salt thereof, which insecticide is other than itxtidaeloprid and
thiamethoxam.
34 Preferably the insecticide is (E)-N~-[(6-chloro-3-pyridyl)methyl]-N~-cyano-
N~
methylacetamidine (acetamiprid or NI-25) The preparation and general uses of
-1-

CA 02244580 1998-08-04
acetatz~,iprid are described in US Patent 5,304,566 and in The Pesticide
T~lanual, 10'"
edition, Ed. C. Tomlin, British Crop Protection Council, 1994, p.730.
Generally the Phyllotreta spp. is Phyllotreta cruciferae, which may also be
known as turnip fly, ctucifer flea beetle, or cabbage flea beetle. Generally
the plant is
a Brassica spp. plant. Preferably the Brassica plant is Brassica napes ( also
known as
Rape or Rapeseed) , Brassica rapa (also known as canola), or Brassica juncea
(mustard).
The method preferably comprises protecting the plant from the time of
etrtergence from the seed from which it grows to flowering of the plant. This
is
generally the period during which the plant is susceptible to attack by
Phyllotreta.
Preferably, the plant is at a growth stage of from the expansion of the plant
cotyledon
to the sixth true leaf. Preferably the plant cotyledon has expanded.
In general the insecticide is applied to the seed in an amount of active
ingredient of fxom 0.1 to 20 grams per kg of seed (g/kg), preferably from 1 to
10 glkg
and most preferably from 2.5 to 7.5 g/kg.
The seed treatment step is effected by conventional means of seed treatment
known to those skilled in the art of seed treatment.
The present iztvention also provides a method of treating seed to protect the
plant from which it grows, the said method cozxaprisiztg applying to the said
seed an
insectieidally effective amount of a ehloronieotinyl insecticide or a
composition
comprising the insecticide, which insecticide is other than imidacloprid or
thiamethoxam.
The invention also provides the seed so treated by the said method of
treatment.
The following non-limiting example provides an example of the invention.
EXAMPLE 1
Acetamiprid is applied to canola seed at rates of 7.5, 10, and 12.5 grams of
active ingredient per kg of seed. Imidacloprid is applied to carxola seed at
rate of
15g/kg of seed. The seed is planted and allowed to grow. At 4, 7, 10 and 14
days post
emergence of the plant, damage is assessed for the plants by lookizag for shot-
hole
damage. All treatments of acetamiprid provide substantially more control than
-2-

CA 02244580 1998-08-04
imidacloprid and are generally eduivalent to the two stage lindane + terbufos
treatment. At the end of the growing season, there is a general yield increase
in plants
which are grown from seed that bas been treated by acetamiprid,
-3-

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 2244580 was not found.

Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: Expired (new Act pat) 2018-08-04
Letter Sent 2007-10-03
Letter Sent 2007-10-03
Letter Sent 2007-10-03
Letter Sent 2007-10-03
Inactive: Single transfer 2007-07-31
Grant by Issuance 2007-04-03
Inactive: Cover page published 2007-04-02
Pre-grant 2007-01-17
Inactive: Final fee received 2007-01-17
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2006-07-17
Letter Sent 2006-07-17
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2006-07-17
Inactive: Approved for allowance (AFA) 2006-06-29
Letter Sent 2006-04-12
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Reinstatement Request Received 2006-02-01
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2006-02-01
Reinstatement Requirements Deemed Compliant for All Abandonment Reasons 2006-02-01
Reinstatement Requirements Deemed Compliant for All Abandonment Reasons 2006-02-01
Inactive: Abandoned - No reply to s.30(2) Rules requisition 2006-01-30
Inactive: Abandoned - No reply to s.29 Rules requisition 2006-01-30
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2005-07-29
Inactive: S.29 Rules - Examiner requisition 2005-07-29
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2003-10-07
Letter Sent 2003-08-21
Request for Examination Received 2003-07-29
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 2003-07-29
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 2003-07-29
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 2000-02-04
Inactive: Cover page published 2000-02-03
Inactive: Single transfer 1998-11-19
Inactive: IPC assigned 1998-10-23
Classification Modified 1998-10-23
Inactive: First IPC assigned 1998-10-23
Inactive: IPC assigned 1998-10-23
Inactive: Courtesy letter - Evidence 1998-10-06
Inactive: Filing certificate - No RFE (English) 1998-10-05
Filing Requirements Determined Compliant 1998-10-05
Application Received - Regular National 1998-10-02

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2006-02-01

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2006-07-20

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
NIPPON SODA
Past Owners on Record
CARLA JEAN KLITTICH
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Description 1998-08-04 3 92
Claims 1998-08-04 1 28
Abstract 1998-08-04 1 8
Cover Page 2000-01-14 1 20
Claims 2006-02-01 2 40
Cover Page 2007-03-13 1 24
Filing Certificate (English) 1998-10-05 1 163
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 1999-01-07 1 114
Reminder of maintenance fee due 2000-04-06 1 111
Reminder - Request for Examination 2003-04-07 1 120
Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 2003-08-21 1 173
Notice of Reinstatement 2006-04-12 1 173
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (R30(2)) 2006-04-10 1 166
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (R29) 2006-04-10 1 166
Commissioner's Notice - Application Found Allowable 2006-07-17 1 161
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2007-10-03 1 129
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2007-10-03 1 129
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2007-10-03 1 129
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2007-10-03 1 129
Correspondence 1998-10-06 1 29
Correspondence 2007-01-17 1 30