Language selection

Search

Patent 2266301 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2266301
(54) English Title: METHOD OF PRODUCING REDUCED IRON AGGLOMERATES
(54) French Title: TECHNIQUE POUR L'OBTENTION D'AGGLOMERATS DE FER
Status: Deemed expired
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C21B 13/10 (2006.01)
  • C22B 1/20 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • FUJI, KOJIRO (Japan)
  • TANAKA, HIDETOSHI (Japan)
  • HARADA, TAKAO (Japan)
  • SUGIYAMA, TAKESHI (Japan)
  • TAKENAKA, YOSHIMICHI (Japan)
  • MIYAGAWA, KAZUYA (Japan)
  • SHIROUCHI, SHOJI (Japan)
  • IWAKIRI, HARUHISA (Japan)
  • NISHIMURA, MAKOTO (Japan)
  • UMEKI, TAKAO (Japan)
  • HASHIMOTO, SUMITO (Japan)
  • UEHARA, TERUHISA (Japan)
(73) Owners :
  • KABUSHIKI KAISHA KOBE SEIKO SHO (Japan)
(71) Applicants :
  • KABUSHIKI KAISHA KOBE SEIKO SHO (Japan)
(74) Agent: RICHES, MCKENZIE & HERBERT LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2003-02-11
(22) Filed Date: 1999-03-23
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 1999-09-24
Examination requested: 1999-03-23
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
10-76032 Japan 1998-03-24

Abstracts

English Abstract





Iron oxide agglomerates incorporated with the carbonaceous material
having a particle size within a range of about 10 to 30 mm are prepared upon
production of reduced iron agglomerates. Then, the iron oxide agglomerates
incorporated with the carbonaceous material were laid thinly at a laying
density of less than 1.4 kg/m2/mm or lower on a hearth of a moving hearth
furnace. Subsequently, the iron oxide agglomerates are heated rapidly such
that the surface temperature of the iron oxide agglomerates reaches
1200°C or
higher within one-thud of the retention period of time of the iron oxide
agglomerates in the moving hearth furnace. Then, the iron oxide
agglomerates are reduced till the metallization ratio thereof reaches 85% or
higher to form reduced iron agglomerates and then the reduced iron
agglomerates are discharged out of the moving hearth furnace. With the
procedures, reduced iron agglomerates of a high average quality can be
obtained at a high productivity.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.





WHAT IS CLAIMED IS:

1. A method of producing reduced iron agglomerates comprising the
following steps of:
preparing iron oxide agglomerates incorporated with a carbonaceous
material having a particle size within a range about from 10 to 30 nm,
thinly laying the iron oxide agglomerates incorporated with the
carbonaceous material at a laying density of 1.4 kg/m2/mm or lower on a hearth
of a moving hearth furnace; and
rapidly heatsrrg the reduced iron agglomerates such that the surface
temperature of the reduced iron agglomerates reaches 1200°C or higher
within
one-third of the retention period of time of the iron oxide agglomerates in
the
moving hearth furnace;
reducing the iron oxide agglomerates to a metallization ratio of 85% or
higher to prepare reduced iron agglomerates and then
discharging the reduced iron agglomerates out of the moving hearth
furnace.

2. A method of producing reduced iron agglomerates as defined in claim 1,
wherein the particle size of more than 80% of the iron oxide agglomerates is
arranged within a range of t2 mm of an aimed particle size in the step of
preparing
the iron oxide agglomerates incorporated with the carbonaceous material.



17




3. A method of producing reduced iron agglomerates as defined in claim 1,
wherein the highest fluidity of the carbonaceous material upon softening and
melting is 0.8 or higher in the step of preparing the iron oxide agglomerates
incorporated with the carbonaceous material.

4. A method of producing reduced iron agglomerates as defined in claim 1,
wherein the reduction ratio of a waste gas from a burner for heating the iron
oxide agglomerates is controlled to Fe or FeO equilibrium before the amount of
CO gas released from the iron oxide agglomerates during reduction is lowered
to less than one-fourth of the amount upon peak generation in the step of
reducing the iron oxide agglomerates incorporated with the carbonaceous
material.

5. A method of producing reduced iron agglomerates as defined in claim 1,
wherein the apparent density of the iron oxide agglomerates produced in the
step of preparing the iron oxide agglomerates incorporated with the
carbonaceous material is 2.3 g/cm3 or more.

6. A method of producing reduced iron agglomerates as defined in claim 1,
wherein the apparent density of the reduced iron agglomerates after
reduction is 2 g/cm3 or higher in the step of reducing the iron oxide
agglomerates incorporated with the carbonaceous material.



18

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02266301 2002-07-25
TITLE OF THE INVENTION
METHOD OF PRODUCING REDUCED IRON AGGLOMERATES
BACKGROZJND OF THE INVENTTON
(FIELD OF THE INVENTION)
The present invention concerns a method of producing reduced iron
agglomerates by reducing iron oxide agglomerates incorporated with a
carbonaceous matexzal.
(DESCRIPTION OF THE RELATED ART)
The MIDREX method is a well-known gas based direct reduction process of
producing reduced iron. In the MIDREX. method, a reducing gas produced from
natural gas is fed through a tuyere into a shaft furnace and allowed to rise
therein for
reduction of iron ores or iron oxide pellets charged therein, to thereby
produce
reduced iron. However, since the method required a supply, as a fuel, of a
large
amount of high-cost natural gas, the location of a plant utilizing the MIDREY
method is limited to a region producing natural gas.
In view of the above, a certain type of method for pre~ducing reduced
iron has become of interest, in which relatively inexpensive coal can be used
instead of natural gas as a reducing agent. A method of producing reduced
iron is disclosed, for example, in US Patent Nos. 3,443,931 and 5,601,631, in
which
powdery ores and

CA 02266301 2002-07-25
c~~rbonaceous matexzals are mixed and palletized and then reduced by heating
iri a high-temperature atmosphere to thereby produce reduced. iron. This
method has advantages in that coal can be used as a reducing agent, as well as
powder of ores can be used directly, reduction can be performed at a high rate
and the carbon content of products can be regulated.
In the method descxzbed in the US Patent applications, dried iron
oxide agglomerates are charged in a traveling hearth heating .furnace such as
a
rotary hearth furnace, heated while movement in the furnace and the iron
oxide agglomerate are reduced by a carbonaceous material.
Reduction of the iron oxide agglomerates by the carbonaceous material
proceeds from the sux~ace of the agglomerates in view of the heat transfer.
Accordingly, in the latter half of the reduction process, while metallic iron
is
deposited on the upper surface layer of the agglomerates, the ~ceducing
reaction
has not yet proceeded su~ciently in the central portion or the lower surface
where the temperature is low, and the quality of the reduced iron is not
satisfactory. In addition, while the temperature for the rotary hearth furnace
is controlled by a combustion burner or secondary combustion of a combustible
gas released from the agglomerates, it is necessary to burn them combustible
gas
released from the fuel and the agglomerates substantially completely at the
e:rdt of the furnace in order to decrease the fuel unit. However, unless an
appropriate reducing atmosphere is maintained, the agglomerates are exposed
to an oxidizing gas, particularly, in the latter half of the reducing zone and
the
metallic iron at the surface layer of the agglomerates is reoxidized to

CA 02266301 2002-07-25
detexzor ate the quality of products.
Further, the iron oxide agglomerates should be of a size suitable to
operation conditions. Those of a size suitable to the operation conditions
attain a high quality after reduction, whereas those of a size smaller than
the
appropxzate size are reoxidized due to excess heating, while those of a size
greater than the appropriate size are rec~~xced only insufficieni;ly due to
ir~su~cient heating. In addition, if the particle size of the agglomerates is
scattered, both of the reduction ratio and the strength are detE~riorated as a
whole product
SZJIVINIARY OF THE INVENTION
An object of the present invention is to provide a method of producing
reduced iron capable of obtaining iron oxide agglomerates having high average
quality at a high productivity.
In the method of producing the iron oxide agglomerates according to
the present invention, iron oxide agglomerates incox~orated with a
carbonaceous material having a particle size ranging about from 10 to 30 mm
are
produced at first. Then, the iron oxide agglomerates incorporated with the
carbonaceous material are laid thinly at a laying density of 1.4 kg/m2/mm or
less on a hearth of a moving hearth furnace. Subsequently, the iron oxide
agglomerates are heated rapidly such that the surface temperature of the iron
oadde agglomerates is raised to 1200°C or higher within one-tlxird of a
retention

CA 02266301 2002-07-25
t me of the iron oxide agglomerates in the moving hearth furnace. Then, after
reducing the iron oxide agglomerates to a metallization ratio of 85% or higher
to form reduced iron agglomerates and then, the reduced iron. agglomerates are
discharged out of the moving hearth furnace.
In the step of producing the iron oxide agglomerates incorporated with
the carbonaceous material, it is desirable to arrange such that more than 80%
of the iron oxide agglomerates are within a range for ~2 mm ~of the aimed
particle
size. It is also desirable that the maximum flowability of the carbonaceous
material used is 0.8 or more upon softening and melting.
It is desirable that the apparent density of the iron oxide agglomerates
produced in the step of producing the iron oxide agglomerates incorporated
with the carbonaceous matexzal is 2.3 g/cm3 or more.
Further, in the step of reducing the iron oxide agglomerates
incorporated with the carbonaceous material, it is desirable to control the
reduction ratio of a waste gas from a burner for heating the icon oxide
agglomerates for Fe or Fe0 equilibxxum before the amount of CO gas released
from the iron oxide agglomerates during reduction is reduced. to less than one-

f:oux~th of that at peak of generation. Further, it is desirable that the
apparent
density of the iron oxide agglomerates after reduction is 2 g/c:m3 or higher.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGrS
Fig. 1 is a view showing a relation between the laying density of
agglomerates and a metallization ratio;
4

CA 02266301 2002-07-25
r,
Fig. 2 is a view illustrating a different of the metallization ratio of the
reduced iron agglomerates between Example 2 and a campara.tive example;
Fig. 3 is a view showing a relation between the particle size and the
rnetallization r atio of the reduced it on agglomerates;
Fig. 4 is a view showing a relation between the reduction ratio of a
combustion gas and the metallization ratio in the latter half of reduction in
E'~xample 3;
Fig. 5 is a view showing a relation between the temperature at the
center of the agglomerates and the gas oxidation ratio ~CO/(C(J + CO~] in
Example 4;
Fig. 6 is a view showing a relation between the heating time and the
temperature at the center of the agglomerates when agglomerates using five
kinds of carbonaceous mateizals of different ffowability are heated in an
atmospheric temperature at 1300°C;
Fig. 7 is a view illustrating comparison the apparent density between
h.ot-molded agglomerates (hot-pressed briquettes) of the present invention and
green agglomerates after drying (pellets) of comparative examples;
Fig. 8 is a view showing results of a reducing test conducted to a
reducing furnace maintained at 1300°C for hot pressed agglomerates and
pelleted agglomerates with the apparent density being varied;
Fig. 9 is a view illustrating a relationship between the apparent
density of agglomerates before reduction and the apparent density of reduced

CA 02266301 2002-07-25
iron agglomerates; and
Fit. 10 is a view showing a result of an experiment in which reduced
ia~on agglomerates having apparent density of 1.6 g/cml and 2.4 g/cm2 are
melted in a crucible.
DESCRIPTION OF T:HE PREFERRED EMBODI1VIENTS
Heat is transmitted predominantly by radiation of heat in a furnace.
Therefore, it is important to lay the iron oxide agglomerates incorporated
with
the carbonaceous material with no overlapping, in view of uniform heating,
vnprovement of the productivity and improvement of the quality. For this
purpose, it is desirable to make the laying density on the hearth to 1.4
kg/m2/mm or lower. In this text, "kg/m2" in the unit for the laying density
means mass of the iron oxide agglomerates per unit area of the hearth, and
":mm" in the unit for the laying density means the average particle size of
the iron
oxide agglomerates.
Further, as shown in Fig. 5, since the reduction ratio [CO/(CO + CO~]
(shown by sampled data) rises abruptly if the temperature exceeds
1200°C, it is
important to rapidly heat the iron oxide agglomerates charged in the furnace
to
1200°C thereby promoting the reduction of the agglomerates. For this
purpose, a heating time up to 1200°C is desirably as short as possible.
However, considering restriction in the actual operation, the surface
temperature of the agglomerates may be raised to 1200°C within ane-
third
6

CA 02266301 2002-07-25
pex~od of the retention time in the furnace after charging.
At the instance the amount of CO gas released from the iron oxide
agglomerates is lowered to t/4 compared with that at the peal; of generation
during reduction, the central portion of the oxide agglomerates is reduced,
while metallic iron is deposited on the surface layer. Accordingly,
reoxidation
of the metallic iron at the surface layer can be prevented and the reduction
at
the surface layer can be promoted by controlling the reduction ratio of the
waste gas from the burner for Fe or Fe0 equilibrium.
By conducting molding upon softening and melting thereby filling the
carbonaceous material in a space between each of iron oxide inn the
agglomerates, the heat conductivity in the agglomerates can be improved. It
is desirable to use a carbonaceous material having a maximum flowability
upon softening and melting of 0.$ or greater. In this case, the surface of the
agglomerates is not melted in the furnace even when the gas temperature in
1~he furnace is raised in order to enhance the productivity. Further, since
the
iron oxide agglomerates incorporated with the carbonaceous material is put to
pressure molding, the gap at the inside is decreased also by thus process, to
improve the heat conductivity. The reducing reaction is promoted by the
improvement of the heat conductivity of the iron oxide agglomerates and, as a
result, the productivity in the reduced iron production can be improved.
Further, when the apparent density of the iron oxide agglomerates
incorporated with the carbonaceous material is increased, mass of the iron
oxide agglomerates per unit area of the hearth is increased to improve the
7

CA 02266301 2002-07-25
productivity. Accordingly, it is desirable that the apparent density of the
iron
ode agglomerates is 2.3 g/cm2 or more.
Upon melting the reduced iron agglomerates, if the apparent density
of the iron oxide agglomerates is higher than that of stags in the melting
fixrnace, since the reduced iron agglomerates do not float on the stags, the
dissolution rate of the reduced iron agglomerates is increased. Accordingly,
it
is desirable that the apparent dcansity of the reduced iron agglomerates after
the reduction is 2 g/cm3 or more which is greater than the usual apparent
density of the stags.
Further, as the particle size of the reduced iron oxide agglomerates
incorporated with the carbonaceous material is made more uniform, the
agglomerates can be laid with no overlapping on the hearth. Further,
deterioration of the quality due to excess heataing or insufficient heating
can be
avoided to obtain products of uniform quality. Accordingly, it is desirable to
control the particle size such that more than 80% of the iron oxide
agglomerates
incorporated with the carbonaceous material is within a range t2 mm of the
aimed particle size.
In the pelletization of the iron oxide agglomerates incorporated with
t:he carbonaceous material, a fuel unit can be decreased by recovering gases
released in the heat-mixing step, pressure molding step and degasing step of
t:he raw material and utilizing the recovered gas as a fuel for a reducing
burner.
Further, reoxidation of the reduced iron agglomerates can be ;prevented by
blowing the recovered gas at the final stage of reduction in the reducing
8

CA 02266301 2002-07-25
furnace.
Further, a fuel supplied to the moving hearth heating furnace can be
decreased by efficiently burning a combustible gas such as CO and H2 released
from the iron oxide agglomerates incorporated with the carbonaceous matexial
in the vicinity of the iron oxide agglomerates as a matter to be heated in the
reducing, thereby using the same as a heat source to be supplied to the matter
to be heated. For this purpose.. it is preferred to supply a secondary
combustion air to burn the burnable gas.
EXAMPLE 1
Iron oxide agglomerates comprising iron ore (7$.3%) and coal (20.0%)
of the ingredients shown in Table 1 in admixture with 1.7% of a binder were
laid on a hearth at a laying density of 1.0 kg/m2/mm, and reduced by using a
x°otaxy hearth furnace at a productivity of 100 kg/m2/hr. The results
are shown
in Fig. 1. In a comparative example shown in the figure, the laying density
was changed to 1.5 kg/m2/mm. As apparent from Fig. 1, if the laying density
of the agglomerates exceeds 1.4 kg/m2/mm, lowering of the metallization ratio
is
observed. In order to improve the quality of the reduced iron agglomerates, it
i.s preferred to make the layer thickness to less than 1, specifically, to
make the
laying density to less than 1.4 kg/m2/rnm.
9

CA 02266301 2002-07-25
(Table 1)
Dry mass
Iron ore T.Fe Si02 A1203 Particle size(-75
,ca~a)


67.9 1.0 0.5 _71


Fixed Volatile Ash Particle size(-75
Goal carbon matter ,um)


72.6 18.8 I 8.6 I 50 - 70


EXAMPLE 2
The same iron oxide agglomerates incoi~orated with the carbonaceous
material as those in Example 1 were laid at a laying density of 1.1 kg/m2/mm
on the hearth so as not to overlap and reduced by using a rotary hearth
furnace
a.t a productivity of 80 kg/m2/hr. The size of the agglomerates was controlled
such that 80% of them had a size within a range of ~2 mm of the aimed particle
size. As a result, reduced iron agglomerates of the quality shown in Fig. 2
were obtained. The laying density of the comparative example was 1.5 to 1.75
kg/m2/mm. As apparent from ~'ig. 2, since the laying density is high in the
comparative example, the metallization ratio of the reduced iron agglomerates
a.t a portion in which the agglomerates are overlapped is reduced by about 30%
compared with the example of the present invention. On the other hand, in
t:he example of the present invention, reduced iron agglomerates of stable
quality at the metallization ratio of 96% are obtained.
Further, Fig. 3 shows a relation between the particle size and the
metallization degree of the reduced iron agglomerates. AS shown in Fig. 3,
peak of the metallization ratio is present at 13 - 16 mm of the particle size
of the

CA 02266301 2002-07-25
reduced iron agglomerates, and the metallization ratio is lowered as the
particle
size is out of the above-mentioned range. From the result, it is optimum that
all of the agglomerates are within a range of -~-1.5 anm of the aimed particle
size,
but it is not easy to attain the range of ~ 1.5 mm of the aimed particle size
if the
agglomerates are pelletized by a pan pelletizer and sieved by a roller screen.
Then, 80% of the agglomerates can be put into the range of ~2 mm of the aimed
particle size by applying press molding to the iron oxide agglomerates. The
particle
size of the agglomerates is usually from 10 to 30 mm although different
depending
on the operation conditions.
EXAMPLE 3
The same iron oxide agglomerates incorporated with the carbonaceous
material as those in Example 1 were charged into a rotary hearth furnace and
reduced at an atmospheric temperature of 1300°C for 9 min. The laying
density was 1.15 kg/m2/mm. The oxidation ratio of the combustion gas [(C02 +
F120)/(CO + HZ + COz + H20)] was changed within a range fio:m :1.0 in the
former half and to 0 - 1.0 in the latter half. Further, the switching time
between the fozmer half and the latter half was also changed within a range
tom 0 to 8 min. Fig. 4 shows a relation between the axidation ratio of the
combustion gas and the metallization ratio in the latter hal~
As shown in Fig. 4, the metallization ratio increases Gong with
decrease of the reduction ratio of the combustion gas and by switching to low
11

CA 02266301 2002-07-25
oxidation ratio more early. Metallization ratio of 85% or higher is obtained
if
the oxidation ratio of the combustion gas in the latter half is switched to
0.53
v~rithin 6 min, and the metallization ratio of 90% or higher can. be obtained
by
switching the oxidation ratio within 4 min, but if the switching time is late
as 8
min, the metallization ratio is 8 5% or lower. Further, If the oxidation ratio
of
the combustion gas after switching is 0, the metallization ratio of 90% or
higher
can be ensured even if the switching tine is late as 6 min. 8;y the way, the
amount of CO generated from the agglomerates is 80% for the peak generation
at 4 min of the switching time, 47% for the peak generation at; 6 min, and 13%
for the peak generation at 8 min. Accordingly, improvement of the
metallization ratio can not be expected even if the oxidation ratio of the
combustion gas is switched to a low reduction ratio after the amount of CO
generated from the agglomerates has been lowered to less than l./4 for the
peak
generation.
EXAMPLE 4
The same iron oxide agglomerates incorporated with the carbonaceous
material as in Example 1 were charged so as not to be overlapped at a laying
density of 1.04 kg/m2/mm into a rotary hearth furnace and reduced. Table 2
shows a portion of reducing conditions and the quality of the reduced iron
agglomerates. The reduction ratio of the waste gas from the burner shown in
t:he table is for Fe203 equilibrium. This reduction shows the presence of
operation conditions capable of attaining a high metallization ratio even if
the
12

CA 02266301 2002-07-25
reduction ratio of the waste gas from the burner is not controlled for Fe or
Fe0
equilibrium. This is considered as below. That is, as shown in Fig. 5, the
temperature of the agglomerates is raised along with increase of the
temperature in the furnace, in which the solution loss reaction is activated
and
the CO/(CO + CO~ value is increased. CO/(CO + CO~ value shows the
reduction ratio of the burner waste gas and as the value is away from the
boundary between Fe and FeO, the reducing potential is improved. Therefore,
an extremely high reducing atmosphere is formed at the periphery of the
agglomerates by the high temperature operation, and it is assumed that the
effect by the reduction ratio of the burner waste gas is lowered.
(Table 2)
Gas tempe-Air/fue~l Gas


Metalliza-Productivityrature ratio ire atmospher


tion ratio near the later eequili-


agglome- half of brium


Example ~g/m2~~mm) rates reducing metal


(%) step


90 - 94 80 1300-1360 10.;; Fe203


EXAMPLE 5
Fig. 6 shows a relation between the heating time and the temperature
at the center of agglomerates when agglomerates using five l4inds of
carbonaceous materials A, C, E, H and I of different fluidity were heated at
an
13

CA 02266301 2002-07-25
atmospheric temperature of 1300°C. As shown in Fig. G, the time that
the
carbonaceous matexzals of high fluidity (carbonaceous materials H, I) reach
1300°C is shorter compared with that of the carbonaceous materials of
low
fluidity (carbonaceous materials A, C). Further, since the reducing reaction
starts at about 800°C, the temperature hysteresis in the course of the
temperature elevation is also important, in which the temperature elevation
rate at the inside of the agglomerates is high in a case of using carbonaceous
materials of high fluidity. Based on the observation for the cross sectional
tissue of the agglomerates in the reducing process, it was consumed that
connected structure of the iron oxide particles with a solid carbon~iceous
material
was formed. In view of the above, it is preferred to use a carbonaceous
material having a highest fluidity upon softening and melting of 0.8 or
higher.
EXAMPLE 6
After mixing the iron ore and pulverized coal shown :in Table 1 at a
ratio of 78% iron ore and 22% of'coal, they were heated to 450°C and
agglomerates of 2 to 5 cm3 were hot molded at a pressure of 3!9 MPa (hot
molded briquettes). As a comparative example, iron ore and pulverized coal
were mixed at an identical mixing ratio to which bentonite w;xs added by about
l.% as a binder and molded into agglomerates of 2 cm3 volume (pellets) by a
pelletizer. Fig. 7 shows an apparent density for each of them. As shown in
Fig. 7, the hot molded agglomerates have an apparent density higher by 40%.
14

CA 02266301 2002-07-25
Then, a reducing test was conducted in a reducing furnace in which
h.ot molded agglomerates and pellet agglomerates were kept apt 1300°C.
The
results are shown in Fig. 8. As apparent from the figure, the reduction time
is
shortened as the apparent density of the agglomerates is increased at an
identical volume. Accordingly, the productivity is also improved by the
increase in the apparent density of the agglomerates. Fig. 9 shows an
apparent density of the agglomerates after reducing the hot molded
agglomerates. As shown in the figure, as the apparent density of the
agglomerates before reduction increases, the apparent density of the
agglomerates after reduction also increases in propoWion therewith. Further
F'ig. 9 shows that when the hot malded agglomerates are applied with a
d.egasing treatment at 500°C for 30 min, swelling of the agglomerates
is
decreased in the reducing step, and the apparent density of the reduced iron
reaches 2 g/cm3 or greater.
Fig. 10 shows the results of an experiment in which reduced iron
agglomerates having an apparent density of 1.6 g/crn3 and 2.4 g/cm3 were
melted in a crucible. The density of the molten slag is usually about 2 g/cm3
and, if the apparent density of the reduced iron agglomerates is lower than
that,
the agglomerates float on the slag surface as shown in the figure and melting
is
retarded. On the other hand, if the apparent density of the reduced iron
agglomerates is high, the agglomerates sink into the slags to promote melting.
As a result of the test, if the apparent density of the agglomerates is 1.6
g/cm3,

CA 02266301 2002-07-25 --
the melting rate is 0.5 kg/min, while if the apparent density is 2.4 g/cm3,
the
melting rate is 2 kg/min. As described above, the milting rage is improved to
four tames by increasing the apparent density of the reduced iron agglomerates
to greater than the apparent density of the slags in the melting furnace.
While the invention has been described in detail and with reference to
specific embodiments thereof, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art
that
various changes and modifications can be made therein without departing from
tile spirit and scope thereof.
16

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 2266301 was not found.

Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date 2003-02-11
(22) Filed 1999-03-23
Examination Requested 1999-03-23
(41) Open to Public Inspection 1999-09-24
(45) Issued 2003-02-11
Deemed Expired 2011-03-23

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Request for Examination $400.00 1999-03-23
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 1999-03-23
Application Fee $300.00 1999-03-23
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 2 2001-03-23 $100.00 2001-03-22
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 3 2002-03-25 $100.00 2002-03-18
Final Fee $300.00 2002-12-02
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 4 2003-03-24 $100.00 2003-03-19
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 5 2004-03-23 $150.00 2003-12-22
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 6 2005-03-23 $200.00 2005-02-08
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 7 2006-03-23 $200.00 2006-02-07
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 8 2007-03-23 $200.00 2007-02-08
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 9 2008-03-24 $200.00 2008-02-08
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 10 2009-03-23 $250.00 2009-02-12
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
KABUSHIKI KAISHA KOBE SEIKO SHO
Past Owners on Record
FUJI, KOJIRO
HARADA, TAKAO
HASHIMOTO, SUMITO
IWAKIRI, HARUHISA
MIYAGAWA, KAZUYA
NISHIMURA, MAKOTO
SHIROUCHI, SHOJI
SUGIYAMA, TAKESHI
TAKENAKA, YOSHIMICHI
TANAKA, HIDETOSHI
UEHARA, TERUHISA
UMEKI, TAKAO
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Abstract 1999-03-23 1 29
Description 1999-03-23 16 604
Cover Page 2003-01-07 2 41
Claims 1999-03-23 2 68
Drawings 1999-03-23 7 122
Cover Page 1999-09-13 1 39
Abstract 2002-07-25 1 33
Description 2002-07-25 16 687
Claims 2002-07-25 2 78
Drawings 2002-07-25 10 159
Fees 2003-03-19 1 39
Prosecution-Amendment 2002-07-25 34 1,087
Fees 2002-03-18 1 42
Correspondence 2002-12-02 1 43
Assignment 1999-03-23 8 232
Fees 2001-03-22 1 38
Prosecution-Amendment 2002-02-15 2 77