Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
CA 02268761 1999-04-16
tPEA~ 2 9 SEP i998
1
SLUDGE DEMULSIFICATION AND LIQUEFACTION PROCESS AND AGENTS
TECHNICAL FIELD
The invention relates generally to liquefaction and demulsification agents for
hydrocarbon based oil sludges and to their use to facilitate the
demulsification and liquefaction
of hydrocarbon based oil sludges and more particularly to their use to
facilitate the
demulsification and liquefaction of sludges in storage tanks.
BACKGROUND ART
Hydrocarbon based oils such as petroleum oils or vegetable oils are often
stored in
tanks. Over time, 'sludge' forms in the bottom of these tanks. Sludge is a
mixture of deposits
that collect at the bottom of the tanks. The sludge can be distinguished from
oil in the tank
primarily by a difference in viscosity. The minimum viscosity for a sludge
varies within the
industry from as low as 100 centipoise to as high as 500 centipoise.
The composition of the sludge varies from tank to tank and will depend upon
the -
composition of the oil or oils that have been stored in a particular tank. The
components of
the sludge can generally be broken into three groups: water and water soluble
materials
(waters); oils and oil soluble materials (oils); and solids. The solids
generally become wetted
with either oils or waters. The sludge is formed when these components
emulsify. (The more
technically correct term for a solid/liquid colloid is "sol." However, for the
sake of
convenience, emulsion is used herein to refer to both liquid/liquid and to
solid/liquid colloids)
Over time, the heavier elements in the oil such as paraffins, asphaltenes and
solids
migrate to the bottom of the tank and enter the sludge. As the concentration
in the sludge of
these heavier components increases, the sludge becomes more viscous and,
depending upon
the sludge components, may even solidify. The sludge becomes problematic when
its viscosity
prevents it from being pumped, and it begins to build up at the bottom of the
tank.
Eventually these sludges must be removed. If left unchecked, the sludge
formation,
will adversely impact the capacity of the tanks. However, removal of these
sludges poses an
expensive and sometimes dangerous problem for those in the tank farm industry.
In one removal method, these sludges are treated with aromatic compounds such
as
toluene to dissolve them. These chemicals have several shortcomings. First,
the aromatic
compounds are generally soluble in oil but not in water. This makes it
difficult for the
aromatics to effectively liquefy sludge which contain any substantial amount
of water.
Second, these chemicals are poor demulsifiers, so the liquefied sludge is
still an emulsion.
CA 02268761 1999-04-16
PCTI~S y 7 i 1 y 12 7
IPEA/tfS 2 9 SEP 1998
2.
Introduction of demulsifiers into the sludges that have been liquefied
aromatically has been
found to lead to poor results. This is believed to result from the aromatic's
inability to form a
solution with the waters in the sludge. The failure to effectively place the
waters into solution
is believed to inhibit the ability of the demulsifters to interact with the
emulsified particles and
thus to break the emulsion. Third, these chemicals often have health and
safety problems
associated with them. Many aromatic compounds are highly flammable and some
are known
carcinogens. This latter trait can substantially increase the disposal
expenses of sludges that
have been aromatically liquefied.
In another method, heat is applied to the sludge, usually with steam. This
process also
provides less than satisfactory results. Some sludges are not readily
susceptible to liquefaction
through heating. Once liquefied, the sludge must be pumped before it cools
because cooling
usually results in the reformation of a solid or semi-solid sludge. Cooling in
the pump lines
can lead to blockages which can be quite difficult to clear. Sludge that is
removed using heat-
is often difficult to remove from the receiving vessel without reheating it.
Heating the sludge
can also cause some sludges to emit vapors which may create a fire hazard or a
health hazard.
A third option is manual removal. This method is time consuming and expensive.
The
men that work in the tank are exposed to potential health risks connected with
the chemicals in
the tank as well as to possible injury in the fires or explosions that are a
constant concern in
the petroleum industry. Despite these drawbacks, manual removal is the only
feasible removal
mechanism for many sludges. Even when the previously discussed methods are
employed, the
sludge is often not rendered sufficiently fluid to be pumped out of the tank
and at least some
portion must be manually removed.
Removal of sludge manually is often very labor intensive, and can take as much
as 180
days to clean a single tank. This results in lost revenue to the tank farm due
to diminished
storage capacity during this period. The labor requirements can often push the
cost of
cleaning a single tank over $(US) 500,000.00.
All of the previously discussed sludge removal methods share a common
shortcoming:
the loss of commercially valuable hydrocarbons contained in the sludge. The
oils that are
trapped in the sludge often have commercial value, but because of their
emulsified state, it is
not feasible to refine them. Consequently, these sludges must be discarded.
This results in a
double loss to the tank farm operator. First, he must throw away the unusable
hydrocarbons
trapped in the sludge. Second, the sludge is frequently treated as hazardous
waste and can be
~HttFn cN~~T
CA 02268761 1999-04-16 ~~~~ 9 T ~ 1912?'
~EA/t~S 2 9 SEP 1998
3
expensive to dispose.
Accordingly, a demulsifier, a liquefaction agent, and method for using the
same are
desired to meet the following objectives.
DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION
It is an object of the invention to liquefy hydrocarbon sludge.
It is another object of the invention to demulsify hydrocarbon sludge.
It is another object of the invention to provide a refineable hydrocarbon
stream from a
liquefied demulsified hydrocarbon sludge.
It is another object of the invention to liquefy hydrocarbon sludge in a
minimal amount
of time.
It is another object of the invention to liquefy hydrocarbon sludge using a
minimal
amount of liquefaction agent.
It is another object of the invention to demulsify hydrocarbon sludge in a
minimal
amount of time.
It is another object of the invention to demulsify hydrocarbon sludge using a
minimal
amount of demulsifier.
It is another object of the invention to provide a liquefied hydrocarbon
sludge which
may be removed with a minimal amount of human interaction with the sludge or
the
liquefaction agent.
It is another object of the invention to provide a demulsified hydrocarbon
sludge which
may be removed with a minimal amount of human interaction with the sludge or
the
demulsifier.
It is another object of the invention to liquefy hydrocarbon sludge without
using heat.
It is another object of the invention to provide a non-toxic agent for the
liquefaction
hydrocarbon sludge.
It is another object of the invention to provide a non-toxic agent for
demulsifying
hydrocarbon sludge. There are demulsifiers known in the art which are capable
of breaking
the emulsions in hydrocarbon sludge. One such demulsifier is dodecyl benzyl
sulfonic acid
(DDBSA). A preferred embodiment of this demulsifier are its salts and most
preferably its
amine salts, all of which are water and oil soluble. The inventor purchases
his DDBSA from
Witco (address given below) and produces amine salts of DDBSA with amines made
by
Texaco Chemical Company, P.O. Box 27707, Houston, TX 77227, and sold under the
trade
~tIAEN~EO SH~E ~
CA 02268761 1999-04-16
p~/~,~ y ? / 1912 7
~~!~ ~ 4 SEP t998
4
name C-6 Amine. The invention comprises a liquefaction agent which facilitates
the action of
the demulsifier by liquefying the sludge and methods of using the same. As the
sludge is
rendered more fluid, the demulsifier is better able to attack the emulsified
particles. As the
emulsions are broken the phases separate and liquidity is restored. The result
is a flowable
end product that is separated into solids, waters, and oils. The oils and the
waters may be
pumped out separately, and if desired the oils may be refined. Only the solids
need to be
removed mechanically.
As noted, the invention works by increasing the liquidity of the sludge which
allows
the demulsifier to work more effectively. Breaking the emulsions also has a
liquefying effect
upon the sludge. In this way, the liquefaction agent and the demulsifier work
together
synergistically. This allows a flowable end product to be produced with a
minimal amount of
liquefaction agent and demulsifier.
The invention comprises the use of two primary liquefaction agents. The first
are the
glycol ethers {CH20H-CHOH-O-R}. These chemicals are an excellent choice for
the
liquefaction agent because they have the somewhat uncommon property of being
soluble in
water and in oil. Thus, they are able to form a solution with both the waters
and the oils in
the emulsion and to disperse the emulsified particles within the solution.
Once the emulsified
particles are dissolved, or at least partially dissolved, and dispersed the
demulsifiers can more
easily obtain access to the particles and break the emulsion. The particular
glycol ether tested
by the inventor was ethylene glycol butyl ether, {CH20H-CHOH-O-C4H9}.
Polymerized glycol ethers, H{-O-CHOH-CHOH-}~OH, are another acceptable
liquefaction agent. Like the monomers, they are soluble in water and in oil
and can thus
liquefy and disperse the emulsified particles. They have advantages over the
monomer in that
they are generally cheaper to manufacture and are generally less toxic than
the monomers.
The particular polymerized glycol ether which has been tested, poly (oxy - 1,
2 ethanediyl), a
butyl ~l hydroxy, H{-O-CH(C4H9)-CHOH-}"OH, outperformed the monomer in
liquefaction
and dispersion. This polymer is a by-product produced in the manufacture of
ethylene glycol
butyl ether. It is frequently considered a waste product, although the
inventor is aware of its
use as a brake fluid. It is available from Occidental Chemical Corp. (OxyChem)
Occidental
Tower, P.O. Box 809050, Dallas, TX 75380 and from Dow Chemical Company,
Midland, MI
48667 under the trade names Glycol Ether Residue and Glycol Ether Bottoms
respectively.
The second primary liquefaction agents are the polyalkylene glycols,
H{O(CHZ)x}~OH.
~~~;r~L~Et7 ~F
..~:,,~ .
CA 02268761 1999-04-16
~ 9~~~912~
~~g 2 9 SEP 1998
5.
They also are soluble in oil and in water and are thus effective liquefaction
and dispersion
agents. Polyalkylene glycols having molecular weights of between about 250 and
about 2500
are expected to provide the best result. Polyalkylene glycols with a molecular
weight below
about 250 are generally expected to be insufficiently oil soluble to perform
adequately. They
are also generally more toxic than the higher molecular weight polymers.
Polyalkylene
glycols with a molecular weight above about 2500 are generally expected to be
too viscous to
effectively enter into solution with the sludge.
A particular polyalkylene glycol which has been shown to perform adequately is
polypropylene glycol. H{OCHZCHZCH2}"OH. Although other polyalkylenes glycols
would be
acceptable liquefaction agents, the residuals of some - such as polyethylene
glycol and
polybutylene glycol - are hazardous. Polypropylene glycols are preferred
because their
residuals are not hazardous. Off specification products will generally be used
where possible
because of their cost advantages over the specification grade products. Use of
the
polypropylene glycols will facilitate the use of the cheaper off specification
products. A
slightly off specification quality polypropylene was used during testing. It
had an average
molecular weight of between 950 and 1,200. As will be illustrated in the
discussion of the
experiments below, it performed quite well and should provide an economical
commercial
substitute for specification quality polypropylene.
These liquefaction agents and demulsifiers may be used in combination with
other
agents to optimize the results obtained. Some of these other agents are
discussed below.
A high paraffin and/or asphaltene content will make the sludge very viscous.
If enough
paraffins and/or asphaltenes are present, the sludge may actually solidify and
can become quite
hard. In such sludges, it is generally desirable and may be necessary to
soften the sludge so
that the demulsifiers and the liquefaction agents can enter the sludge. To
soften the sludge, it
should be treated with a plasticizer, such as terpene. Terpenes, {C,oHl6}, are
oil soluble,
water insoluble compounds which are distilled from plants. Of principal
relevance to the
present invention is their ability to dissolve paraffins. By dissolving, or
partially dissolving,
the paraffins, the terpenes can soften the sludge sufficiently to allow the
demulsifiers and the
liquefaction agents to enter.
Many terpenes are toxic; however, citrene, a terpene extracted from citrus
rinds, is not
toxic and is a good plasticizing agent. Citrene is, therefore, preferred over
the other terpenes
as a plasticizer. In addition to their toxicity, most terpenes are also
flammable. Citrene, for
A1~NOE0 SHEET
CA 02268761 1999-04-16
9~r 1~1~
~~~IIU,S ~ 9 SEP 1998
6
example, has a flash point of 120° F. The terpenes may be used more
safely by mixing them
with a liquefaction agent. For example, a 1:1 mixture by volume of citrene and
poly (oxy - 1,
2 ethanediyl), a butyl ~ hydroxy has a flash point of 180° to
200° F. While this is no longer
considered flammable, it is still considered combustible and it should be
handled accordingly.
Another agent which may be used in combination with the demulsifiers and
liquefaction
agents is sodium silicate which may be used to facilitate the separation of
solids from the
sludge. The sodium silicate helps to break the adhesion between the oils and
the solids and
forms a coating on the solid particles. The coating prevents the oils from
readhering to the
solids and encourages gravity separation of the solids from the sludge.
Another agent which may be added to the demulsifiers and liquefaction agents
is a
blend of resin esters and glycol esters. This agent is added primarily to
effect the separation
of the finer solid particles from the sludge. Additionally, it is useful in
completing the
separation of the waters from the emulsion. This agent may be thought of as a
"polishing"
agent in that its function is primarily to remove the last of the solids and
the waters from the
almost fully separated emulsion. Its composition beyond that listed above is
unknown. It is
an oil soluble but water insoluble product sold by Witco Corp. of 3200
Brookfield (Almaeda
Rd.), Houston, Texas, under their trade names DRE8164 and DRG162.
In some applications it may be desirable to add an acid to the sludge. First,
the
inventor has noticed a mild increase in the effectiveness of the liquefaction
agents and
demulsifiers when their pH is acidic. Second, the addition of the acid can
have positive effects
on the cost of disposing the waters separated from the sludge. Many of the
agents discussed
above have a pH which is quite basic. As a result, the waters produced in the
demulsification
process will be basic as well. Their basicity can increase the cost of
disposal because of the
environmental problems associated with high pH waste water. Addition of an
appropriate
amount of acid can lower pH to acceptable levels. The inventor contemplates
using citric acid
as the acid additive because it is non-toxic. However, for purposes of
lowering pH, other
acids are acceptable.
Use of the acid agent will usually be undesirable in petroleum sludges because
most
petroleum sludges contain iron sulfides. The acids will react with the iron
sulfides to produce
hydrogen sulfide, a highly poisonous gas. This will not be a problem when the
invention is
used to separate sludges that do not contain sulfides, such as vegetable oil
sludges.
In operation, the liquefaction agent or agents and the demulsifier will be
added to the
A1~IENDEO SHEET
CA 02268761 1999-04-16
y? / 19 .1
~ 9 SEP 1998
sludge. The other agents discussed above may be added as well. The sludge and
added
components will be mixed together and recirculated for several hours. The
agents will act
upon the sludge, causing it to liquefy and to demulsify. Upon completion of
the process, the
sludge will separate into an oil layer, a water layer and a solid layer. The
liquids may be
removed and easily separated. It is anticipated that the oils extracted from
the sludge will be
refmeable in most cases. The waters will usually be treated and discarded. The
solids will
require mechanical removal from the tank and will also usually be discarded.
The preferred
mode of effecting these steps is discussed in more detail in the following
sections.
BEST MODE OF CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION
The inventor contemplates using the invention in five different formulations.
These are
referred to for convenience as C 105 BC, C 105 AC, C 105 SA, C 105 EB, and C
105 EBS . The
composition for each of these is given below. All percentages are by volume
and are intended
to be approximations only and not limiting in any sense.
NaSi 5 °b X105 E~
glycol ether 5 ~ amine salt of DDBSA 60 Rb
[preferably poly (oxy -
1, 2 ethanediyl), a butyl ~ hydroxy] polyalkylene glycol 15
[preferably polypropylene
water 90~ glycol M.W. = 950 to = 1200]
C105 ACAC blend of resin esters 12.5 °~
and glycol esters
add citric acid 1 % [preferably DRE8164 ( 10 °b ) and
[solid concentrate pH < 1] DRG162 (2.5 % ) Witco, Corp.]
to C 105 BC
terpene [preferably citrene] 12.5 °~
glycol ether 50
[preferably poly (oxy -
1, 2 ethanediyl), a butyl ~ hydroxy]
terpene 50 ~
[preferably citrene]
E~? a~;:
CA 02268761 1999-04-16 r~
4?~''lyl
. ,~ 2 9 SEP 1998
Clos EB to to 40~
C 105 SA 90 to 60
In practice, either the C 105 AC or the C 105 BC will usually be applied
first; followed
by the C 105 EB. If the paraffin content is high, the C 105 SA or C 105 EBS
should be used
first, again followed by the C105 EB. To facilitate the selection of which
formulations of the
invention should be used, the operator should first obtain a sample of the
sludge. Paraffin
content could be measured directly from the sample; however, it will usually
be more
convenient to measure viscosity as the viscosity will largely be a function of
the paraffin
content and of the molecular weight of the particular paraffins.
For sludges with a viscosity of less than about 1500 centipoise, the C 105 BC
or C 105
AC will usually be an acceptable liquefaction agent. Sludges with a viscosity
of between about
1500 and about 5000 centipoise will usually respond better to treatment with
some C 105 SA or
C105 EBS liquefaction agent. However, it should be noted that in the examples
discussed
below, a sludge having a viscosity of approximately 4000 centipoise was
effectively treated
using only C105 BC and C 105 EB. Sludges with a viscosity above about 5000
centipoise will
usually require initial treatment with a C 105 SA liquefaction agent. In all
cases, treatment
with a C 105 EB demulsifier will follow the initial treatment. The only
exception being the
case where the C 105 EBS has a sufficiently high C 105 EB content that
addition of further
C105 EB is not necessary.
When the C 105 BC or C 105 AC liquefaction agents are used, the inventor
expects an
~1~r11cn c~:ct
CA 02268761 1999-04-16
~~~ ~ 7 / 19 12 7
2 9 SEP 1998
9~
addition of a volume of the liquefaction agent equal to about one ( 1 )
percent to about ten ( 10)
percent of the total sludge volume to be sufficient, and expects a volume of
about six (6)
percent to be appropriate in most cases. When the C 105 SA liquefaction agent
is used, the
inventor expects an addition of a volume of the liquefaction agent equal to
about two and one
half (2.5) percent to about thirty (30) percent of the total sludge volume to
be sufficient, and
expects a volume of about five (5) percent to about ten ( 10) percent to be
appropriate in most
cases. When the C 105 EBS liquefaction agent is used, the inventor expects an
addition of a
volume of the liquefaction agent equal to about one half of one (0.5) percent
to about ten ( 10)
percent of the total volume of the sludge to be sufficient, and expects a
volume of about two
and one half (2.5) percent to about five (5) percent to be appropriate. in
most cases. When the
C105 EB demulsifier is used, the inventor expects an addition of a volume of
the demulsifier
equal to about one half of one (0.5) percent to about one and one half (1.5)
percent of the total
volume of the sludge to be sufficient, and expects a volume of about one half
of one (0.5)
percent to be appropriate in most cases.
In many cases where the C 105 SA or C 105 EBS is used, the amount needed may
be
reduced by using either liquefaction agent in combination with the C 105 BC
liquefaction
agent. This is especially beneficial from a cost perspective. Of the different
formulations,
C 105 BC and C 105 AC are the least expensive. The C 105 SA is considerably
more
expensive. The C105 EBS and the C105 EB are more expensive still. Use of the
C105 BC to
reduce the amount of C 105 SA or C 105 EBS needed can reduce the overall cost
of treatment.
It must be emphasized that each sludge is different. The variety of sludge
compositions
requires that some trial and error lab work be performed on small sludge
samples to determine
the exact combination of formulations that would be best to liquefy and
demulsify any
particular sludge.
~wcwncn c~:r~
CA 02268761 1999-04-16
~GTI~ ~ ?
2 9 SEP 1998
lo, - ~ -
In some applications, it may be desirable to minimize the amount of
demulsifiers or
liquefaction agents that enter the waters in the sludge. It is often necessary
to treat these
waters before they are disposed, and the removal of any additional chemicals
contained in the
water will increase the cost of that treatment. However, several of the
chemicals used as
liquefaction agents or as demulsifiers are soluble in oil and water. When
these agents are
added to the sludge, some of them will ultimately end up in the waters. The
amount in the
waters can be minimized by placing the agents in solution with water insoluble
chemicals prior
to their introduction into the sludge. The water insoluble chemicals are
believed to buffer the
ability of the water soluble chemicals to go into solution with the waters.
For example, this
will result in the water stream removed from a sludge treated with C105 SA or
C105 EBS
containing fewer glycol ethers than the water stream from a similar sludge
treated with C 105
BC. Although it will increase the cost of treatment, it may be desirable in
some instances to
treat even sludges with viscosities of less than 1500 centipoise with
liquefaction agents that
consist of only C 105 SA or C 105 EBS .
When used to treat sludge in storage tanks, the different formulations of the
invention
may be introduced through the tank's loading and drainage pipes. In a
preferred mode of
operation, pumps are added so that the formulations may be added under
pressure. Delivering
the demulsifiers and liquefaction agents under pressure allows them to
physically penetrate
more deeply within the sludge which in turn allows the sludge to be treated
more rapidly.
Pressures of 40 to 120 p.s.i. have been found to be effective.
In operation, the formulations are added to the sludge under pressure through
the tank's
loading pipes. The excess fluid is then pumped out of the tank's drainage
pipes, recirculated
by the pump back into the loading pipes, and reintroduced into the tank under
pressure. As
the process is repeated and the sludge becomes more fluid, the liquefied
sludge will join the
~w0E0 S~tEE~
CA 02268761 1999-04-16
f PI~UI~S z 9 SEP 198
11.
excess fluid and will be recirculated itself. This leads to a thorough mixture
of the
demulsifiers and liquefaction agents with the sludge which in turn leads to a
thorough
treatment of the entire sludge.
The most preferred mode of administering the formulations of the invention
contemplated by the inventor would entail injecting the formulations into the
sludge under
pressure through a plurality of extensible nozzles extending down from the top
of the tank.
This would allow the formulations to be introduced into the sludge evenly and
should lead to
quicker demulsification and liquefaction with the introduction of less of the
respective agents.
As in the previous mode of administering the formulations of the invention,
the excess fluid
would be pumped out through the drainage pipes, recirculated by the pumps and
reintroduced
to the tank via the nozzles. The inventor anticipates that a pressure of 150
to 500 p.s.i would
be preferable in this mode of operation.
Examples
In the following examples, the glycol ether in the C105 BC was in the form of
Glycol
Ether Residue obtained from Oxychem which was over 90% poly (oxy - l, 2
ethanediyl), a
butyl i~ hydroxy, and the polyalkylene glycols were in the form of an off
specification
polypropylene glycol having an average molecular weight of between about 950
and about
1200
The invention was used to treat a crude oil storage tank having a total volume
of
approximately 200,000 bbl and containing approximately 25,000 bbl of sludge. A
sample was
taken revealing that the sludge contained about 56.7 % by weight oils and
about 43.3 % by
weight waters. Contained within the waters were about 7.5 % by volume solids.
The sludge
had a viscosity of about 4000 centipoise.
A~If LADED SHEEt
CA 02268761 1999-04-16
'~.~ i/!~~ ~ 9 S~~' ~9~~
1~.,
Approximately 1500 bbl of C 105 BC (-6% of the sludge volume) were added to
the
tank over six hours. Recirculation at approximately 8000 bbl per hour was
conducted while
the C 105 BC was being introduced. Approximately 125 to 160 bbl of C 105 EB (
~ 5000 ppm)
were then added. Recirculation was continued for forty-eight hours at
approximately 8000 bbl
per hour. At the end of the forty-eight hours, the sludge was liquefied and
demulsified. An
oil layer and a water layer having a combined volume of approximately 24,500
bbl was
pumped off. A solid layer comprising primarily sand and anhydrite remained.
The solid layer
had a volume of approximately 500 bbl. Waters were of course contained within
the solid
layer. These waters were siphoned out and the solids were mechanically
removed.
The liquids extracted from this tank were disposable as oil field waste under
the EPA's
solid waste disposal regulations. No waste was classified as hazardous waste.
The total
volume of the demulsifiers and liquefaction agents used to treat the sludge
was less than 1700
bbl. This amounted to less than 7 °Xo of the total volume of sludge
treated. Finally, the total
down time for the tank was only 6 days.
Elcamnle 22
The invention was used to treat a crude oil storage tank having a total volume
of
approximately 200,000 bbl and containing approximately 31,000 bbl of sludge.
The sample
data taken from the sludge in example one was used in treating the sludge in
this example.
Approximately 1900 bbl (--69b of the sludge volume) of C105 BC were added to
the
tank over eight hours. Recirculation at approximately 8000 bbl per hour was
conducted
during the introduction of the C 105 BC . When all of the C 105 BC had been
added
approximately 155 to 165 bbl (-5000 ppm) of C 105 EB were added to the tank.
Recirculation
was continued for forty-eight hours at approximately 8000 bbl per hour. At the
end of the
forty-eight hours, the sludge was liquefied and demulsified. An oil layer and
a water layer
AIIAL~~tt~~':~ ~',~;a ~ ,
.,
CA 02268761 1999-04-16
P Ea/l~S 2 9 S E P 1998
13
having a combined volume of approximately 30,850 bbl were pumped off. A solid
layer
comprising primarily sand and anhydrite remained. The solid layer had a volume
of
approximately 150 bbl. Waters were of course contained within the solid layer.
These waters
were siphoned out and the solids were mechanically removed.
The liquids extracted from this tank were disposable as oil field waste under
the EPA
solid waste disposal regulations. No waste was classified as hazardous waste.
The total
volume of demulsifiers and liquefaction agents used to treat the sludge was
less than 2,100
bbl. This amounted to less than 7 % of the total volume of sludge treated.
Finally, the total
down time for the tank was only five days.
~~,c~le 3
The invention was used to treat a crude oil storage tank having a total volume
of
approximately 200,000 bbl and containing approximately 7,500 bbl of sludge.
The sample
data taken from the sludge in example one was used in treating the sludge in
this example.
Approximately 450 bbl ( ~ 6 k of the sludge volume) of C 105 BC were added to
the
tank over three hours. Recirculation at approximately 8000 bbl per hour was
conducted
during the introduction of the C 105 BC. When all of the C 105 BC had been
added,
approximately 35 - 40 bbl ( ~ 5000 ppm) of C 105 EB were added to the tank.
Recirculation
was continued for forty-eight hours at 8000 bbl per hour. At the end of the
forty-eight hours,
the sludge was liquefied and demulsified.
This former sludge and the C 105 BC and C 105 EB it contained were pumped into
a
second tank having a total volume of approximately 200,000 bbl and containing
approximately
2,500 bbl of sludge. No additional chemicals were added.
The contents of the second tank were circulated for forty-eight hours. At the
end of the
forty-eight hours, the sludge was liquefied and demulsified. An oil layer and
a water layer
a~rcrncn ~sa~ct
CA 02268761 1999-04-16 ~~ ~ 7 ~ 1 9 1 Z 7
i PErAI~B 2 9 SEP~ x998
14
having a combined volume of approximately 9,800 bbl were pumped off. A solid
layer
comprising primarily sand and anhydrite remained. The solid layer from both
tanks had a
volume of less than 200 bbl. Waters were of course contained within the solid
layer. These
waters were siphoned out and the solids were mechanically removed. The liquids
extracted
from this tank were disposable as oil field waste under the EPA solid waste
disposal
regulations. No waste was classified as hazardous waste.
In the foregoing examples, the oils and waters were both disposed of, so their
individual volumes were not measured; however, an observable separation was
noted in all
three tanks. Also, a sample was taken of the liquefied and demulsified oil
layer in one tank,
and it was found to have an API (American Petroleum Institute) gravity of
34.6. This
relatively high API gravity is indicative of a low water content in the oil
layer. In light of this
API gravity, the liquids extracted could have easily been separated and sent
to a refinery for
processing.
Separate samples were not taken from the sludge in each tank. Nor were post
liquefaction and demulsification samples taken of the oil layers in each tank.
Ordinarily, this
would have been done; however, separate samples were not needed from each
because the
tanks in question were all exclusively used to store oil from the same field.
Thus, the sludges
were all expected to be of substantially the same constitution as were the
products produced
when those sludges were liquefied and demulsified.
Other uses and embodiments of the invention, equivalent to that disclosed
herein, will
occur to those skilled in the art, and are intended to be included within the
scope and spirit of
the following claims.
e,~Nn~n ~~ ;f ~ ~
