Language selection

Search

Patent 2272595 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2272595
(54) English Title: TECHNIQUE FOR EFFECTIVELY GENERATING MULTI-DIMENSIONAL SYMBOLS REPRESENTING POSTAL INFORMATION
(54) French Title: TECHNIQUE PERMETTANT DE GENERER DE MANIERE EFFICACE DES SYMBOLES MULTIDIMENSIONNELS REPRESENTANT DES INFORMATIONS POSTALES
Status: Deemed expired
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • G07B 17/04 (2006.01)
  • G06F 1/00 (2006.01)
  • G07B 17/00 (2006.01)
  • H04L 9/32 (2006.01)
  • G06F 21/00 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • SCHWARTZ, ROBERT G. (United States of America)
  • BROOKNER, GEORGE M. (United States of America)
  • NACLERIO, EDWARD (United States of America)
  • ZUIDEMA, ERIC (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • ASCOM HASLER MAILING SYSTEMS, INC. (United States of America)
(71) Applicants :
  • ASCOM HASLER MAILING SYSTEMS, INC. (United States of America)
(74) Agent: MBM INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2005-06-21
(86) PCT Filing Date: 1998-09-21
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 1999-04-01
Examination requested: 1999-09-27
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/US1998/019652
(87) International Publication Number: WO1999/016023
(85) National Entry: 1999-05-21

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
60/059,486 United States of America 1997-09-22

Abstracts

English Abstract



In a mailing system for franking a postage indicium serving as a proof of
postage, postal data including the postage needs to be
communicated through such an indicium. Illustratively, the postal data is
categorized into (a) invariable postal data, e.g., a device ID
identifying the mailing system, which is unaffected by a franking transaction,
and (b) variable postal data, e.g., the postage, which may
change from one franking transaction to another. To avoid latency of the
franking operation, the invariable postal data is preset for initial
printing of the postage indicium, and the variable postal data is determined
and set for printing in real time. In printing the postage indicium,
the invariable postal data and the variable postal data are presented in that
order in one or more symbols.


French Abstract

Dans un système de postage permettant l'affranchissement d'une empreinte d'affranchissement servant de preuve d'envoi, les données postales, y compris l'affranchissement, doivent être communiquées par ce type d'empreinte. Ainsi, les données postales sont classées en (a) données postales invariables, par exemple, un identificateur identifiant le système de postage, lesquelles ne sont pas affectées par une opération d'affranchissement, et en (b) données postales variables, par exemple, l'affranchissement, pouvant changer d'une opération d'affranchissement à une autre. Pour éviter l'attente aux guichets postaux, les données postales invariables sont prédéterminées pour une impression initiale de l'empreinte d'affranchissement, et les données postales variables sont déterminées et définies pour une impression en temps réel. Pendant l'impression de l'empreinte d'affranchissement, les données postales invariables et variables sont présentées dans cet ordre dans un ou plusieurs symboles.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.




-23-~

THE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION IN WHICH AN EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY
OR PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:

1. ~Apparatus for generating a postage indicium based on at least first data,
the first data
being a function of second data, the apparatus comprising:

a processor for determining at least one candidate for the first data based on
a predicted
version of the second data, said predicted version of the second data being
based on
historical postal data;

a comparator for comparing an actual version of the second data, being an
immediate
postal requirement, with the predicted version thereof received from the
processor, and
where finding a match sending a request to the output; and

an output, on receiving a request from the comparator, generates the postage
indicium
based on the first data.

2. ~The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the second data concerns a postage
value.

3. ~The apparatus of claim 1 or 2, wherein the second data concerns a mail
class.

4. ~The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the predicted version of the second data
is statistically
determined.

5. ~The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the predicted version of the second data
includes a
postage value indicated in the last postage indicium generated by the
apparatus.

6. ~The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the first data concerns a code for
authenticating the
postage indicium.

7. ~The apparatus of claim 6, wherein the code includes at least part of a
digital signature.

8. ~The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the processor includes the comparator.


-24-

9. ~Apparatus for creating a postage indicium representing a plurality of data
elements, and
at least one code for authenticating selected ones of the data elements, the
apparatus comprising:

an interface for receiving a request for creating the postage indicium; and

a processor for performing first computations to generate the code, said first
computations being performed before the request is received, said first
computations
being based on historical data where actual data is not known, said processor
on receipt
of real data, performs a comparison between data used in the first
computations and the
real data to determine whether second computations using the real data of an
actual postal
request are required and then where required the second computations are
performed
using the real data to re-compute the code, wherein the code includes a
digital signature,
and selected computations of the first computations and second computations
include
generation of a random number, said processor creating the postage indicium
based on
said code and said random number.

10. ~The apparatus of claim 9, wherein the selected computations include a
computation based
on a value of the random number.

11. ~The apparatus of claim 9, wherein the selected computations include a
computation of a
signature value r in accordance with a digital signature algorithm (DSA).

12. ~The apparatus of claim 9, wherein the selected computations include a
computation based
on a value of a private key in accordance with a cryptographic algorithm.

13. ~A method for generating a postage indicium based on at least first data,
the first data
being a function of second data, the method comprising:
determining at least one candidate for the first data based on a predicted
version of the
second data;



-25-~

comparing an actual version of the second data with the predicted version
thereof; and
generating the postage indicium based on the candidate for the first data when
the actual
version matches the predicted version.

14. ~The method of claim 13, wherein the second data concerns a postage value.

15. ~The method of claim 13 or 14, wherein the second data concerns a mail
class.

16. ~The method of claim 13, wherein the predicted version of the second data
is statistically
determined.

17. ~The method of claim 13, wherein the predicted version of the second data
includes a
postage value indicated in the last postage indicium generated by the method.

18. ~The method of claim 13, wherein the first data concerns a code for
authenticating the
postage indicium.

19. ~The method of claim 18, wherein the code includes at least part of a
digital signature.

20. ~A method for creating a postage indicium representing a plurality of data
elements, and at
least one code for authenticating selected ones of the data elements, the
method comprising:
performing first computations to generate the code, wherein the first
computations are
performed before a request for creating the postage indicium is received, and
are based
on a statistical best estimate of a postage requirement;

receiving a request for an actual postage requirement, comparing the actual
postage
requirement and the statistical best estimate;

performing second computations to re-compute the code where a difference
occurs
between the actual postage requirement and the statistical best estimate,
wherein the code



-26-

includes a digital signature, and selected computations of the first
computations and
second computations include generation of a random number; and

creating a postage indicium based on the code.

21. ~The method of claim 20, wherein the selected computations include a
computation based
on a value of the random number.

22. ~The method of claim 20, wherein the selected computations include a
computation of a
signature value r in accordance with a DSA.

23. ~The method of claim 20, wherein the selected computations include a
computation based
on a value of a private key in accordance with a cryptographic algorithm.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.



CA 02272595 1999-OS-21
WO 99/16023 PCT/US98/19652
-1-
Descript:ion
Technique for Effectively Generating
Multi-Dimensional Symbols Ret~re~sentina Postal Information
Technical Field
The invention relate; to a technique for
generating multi-dimensional symbols representative of
information, and more particularly to a technique for
franking postage indicia incorporating such symbols
representative of postal information.
Background of the Invention
Communications of inf=ormation, e.g., via email,
telephone, mail, etc., are essential in daily life.
Security and accuracy of such communications invariably
are the major concerns.
To prevent tampering or unauthorized use of
communications containing vita:L information,
cryptographic methodologies fo:r maintaining secrecy of
data communications have been developed. One such
methodology is RSA cryptographic method, named after its
developers, Rivest, Shamir and Adleman. For details on
the RSA method, one may refer to: R. Rivest et al., "A
Method for Obtaining Digital Signatures and Public Key
Cryptosystems," Communications of the ACM, Vol. 21, No.
2, February 1978. The RSA method involves a public key
algorithm which uses a private key for encryption of data
and a public key for decryption thereof. Unlike a
private key, a public key can be published and made known
to the public. The keys for the RSA algorithm are
generated mathematically, and are computational inverses
to each other. The success of the RSA method depends on
the use of very large numbers for the keys.
In addition to providing data encryption, some
cryptographic methods can be used to authenticate a
message. For example, public key algorithms such as the


CA 02272595 1999-OS-21
WO 99/16023 PCT/US98/19652
-2-
aforementioned RSA algorithm can be used to generate a
"digital signature" for verifying the origin of the
message and the identity of the' sender. Another
algorithm known as the "Digital. Signature Algorithm
(DSA)" can be used for that purpose as well. For details
on the DSA, one may refer to: "Digital Signature Standard
(DSS)," FIPS PUB 186, May 19, 7_994. A digital signature
is distinct for each message. The sender of the message
uses his/her private key to digitally sign the message,
and the resulting digital signature accompanies the
message. The recipient of the message uses the sender's
public key to verify the digital signature. If any
alteration in either the signai~ure or message occurs, the
signature does not verify.
Information may be represented using a
symbology. One such symbology comprises barcodes which
may be one-dimensional or two-dimensional (2-D), and may
be optically scanned to recover the information
represented thereby. A 2-D ba:rcode may be formatted in
accordance with the well-known Uniform Symbology
Specification PDF 417. Another symbology comprises data
matrix symbols, which are formatted in accordance with
the "International Symbology Specification - Data
Matrix," AIM International Technical Specification, AIM
International, Inc., 1996 (hereinafter the "Data Matrix
specification"), and may also be optically scanned to
recover the information represented thereby.
As is well known, a data matrix symbol is made
up of square modules or cells representing information.
Figs. lA and 1B illustrate one such data matrix symbol
(denoted 100), and its finder patterns (collectively
denoted 150) defining data regions in symbol 100,
respectively. As jointly shown in Figs. lA and 1B, data
matrix symbol 100 includes data regions I, II, III and IV
containing square modules which are disposed in arrays.
A dark module represents a first data value (e. g., binary
bit "1"), and a light module represents a second data


CA 02272595 1999-OS-21
WO 99/16023 PCT/US98/19652
-3-
value (e. g., binary bit "0"). Symbol 100 is typically
square in shape, and the number of rows (or number of
columns) of the modules, and thus its size, increases
with the amount of data represented thereby. Symbol 100
also includes codewords for checking and correcting
errors in the data after its communication, thereby
affording accuracy of the communicated data. For
example, symbol 100 is of the type of the so-called
"error checking and correcting (ECC) 200" data matrix
symbol, and the codewords therein are generated in
accordance with the well-known Reed-Solomon error
correction technique.
Each data region in :symbol 100 is surrounded by
a finder pattern which is one module wide. For example,
the finder pattern for data region I consists of solid
arrays 153 and 155 made up of dark modules only, and
broken arrays 157 and 159 made up of alternating dark and
light modules; the finder pattern for data region II
consists of solid arrays 163 and 165, and broken arrays
167 and 169; and so on and so forth. In a well known
manner, the finder patterns of a data matrix symbol
determine, among other things, physical size and
distortion of the symbol.
Because of the ubiquitous presence of
computers, in particular, personal computers (PCs), it is
anticipated that use of a general purpose computer, in
lieu of a specialized postage meter, to frank or print
postage indicia serving as a proof of postage on
mailpieces is imminent. To deter printing of
unauthorized postage, the postage indicium applied on a
mailpiece includes postal information which is digitally
signed, and thereby can be authenticated by a postal
authority when the mailpiece is processed. To facilitate
the mail processing, the indicium includes a machine
readable portion including a 2-D symbol, e.g., a 2-D
barcode, readable by an optical scanner.


CA 02272595 1999-OS-21
WO 99/16023 PCT/US98/19652
-4-
Summary of the Invention
In accordance with the invention, the postage
indicium is generated in a pipeline fashion to expedite a
postage franking transaction. For example, in generating
the postage indicium which includes at least one symbol,
e.g., a data matrix symbol, representing postal data
elements, as soon as new information concerning a bit map
for the print image of the symbol is made available, such
information is utilized to print the symbol as much as
possible. To facilitate the pipeline operation, the
layout of the bit map is designed in such a way that the
leading portion of the bit map corresponds to those
postal data elements which can be determined without
regard to any subsequent postal. data elements, which
correspond to the remaining part of the bit map. To that
end, the postal data elements t:o be represented are
arranged in such an order that those postal data elements
(e.g., postal data elements concerning accounting of
dispensed postage) which need t:o be determined based on
other postal data elements (e.c~., current dispensed
postage) are disposed after such other postal data
elements in the bit map representation, thereby obviating
the need to modify the bit map as it is being laid out
and made available for printinc3.
In accordance with an aspect of the invention,
the postal data elements are c<~tegorized into invariable
and variable postal data elements. The invariable postal
data elements are those data elements which are
unaffected by the postage franlcing transaction while the
remaining variable postal data elements are subject to
change during the transaction. In particular, the
invention embraces the approach where a single symbol is
used in the machine readable portion to represent a
combination of the invariable and variable postal data
elements, with the invariable postal data elements
processed first and represented by the leading portion of
the symbol, followed by the variable postal data elements


CA 02272595 1999-OS-21
WO 99/16023 PCT/US98/19652
-5-
represented by the remaining portion of the same symbol,
as the invariable postal data elements are independent of
the subsequent, variable postal. data elements.
The invention also ennbraces a multi-symbol
approach where the machine readable portion includes at
least a first symbol and a second symbol.. The first
symbol is used to represent those invariable postal data
elements and preset for printing. The second symbol is
used to represent the variable postal data elements and
created in real time of the franking transaction. During
the franking transaction, to avoid latency, the first
symbol is printed before the second symbol.
To further expedite t:he postage franking
transaction, prior to the tran~;action, selected data
(e. g., the postage to be dispensed) having an unknown
value is assumed using a predicaed value to generate one
or more candidates for at least: one postal data element
dependent upon the selected data. The predicted value
may be statistically determined. The actual value of the
selected data is subsequently <:ompared with the predicted
value. If the actual value mat:ches the predicted value,
the candidate corresponding to the predicted value is
adopted during the transaction.
Other ways to expedii:e the franking transaction
include computing at least pari~ of a digital signature
for authenticating the postal data elements represented
by the postage indicium prior to the franking
transaction. Where the size o:E a symbol in the machine
readable portion of the postage indicium exceeds the
print coverage of a single printhead in a printer, a
print assembly in accordance with the invention which
includes multiple printheads ins used to print the symbol
or its equivalent, thereby effectively communicating the
data represented by the symbol in a single pass of the
print assembly, as opposed to vmultiple passes required of
the single printhead.


CA 02272595 2003-03-18
-6-
Brief Description of the Drawinq
Further objects, features and advantages of the
invention will become apparent from the following
detailed description taken in conjunction with the
accompanying drawing, in which:
Figs. lA and 1B illustrate a prior art data
matrix symbol and its finder patterns, respectively;
Fig. 2 is a block diagram of a mailing system
in accordance with the invention;
l0 Fig, 3 is a block diagram of a postal security
device used in the mailing system of Fig. 2;
Fig. 4 illustrates a postage indicium generated
by the mailing system of Fig. 2:
Fig. 5A is a flow chart depicting a,subroutine
for generating a part of the postage indicium of Fig. 4;
Figs. 58 and 5C are flow charts jointly
depicting a main routine for generating the postage
indicium of Fig. 4;
Fig. 6 illustrates a segmented data matrix
2o symbol in accordance with the invention;
Fig. 7 illustrates a printhead assembly for
generating the symbol of Fig. 6; and
Fig. 8 illustrates a second, segmented data
matrix symbol in accordance with the invention.
Throughout the figures of the drawing, the same
reference numerals and characters are used to denote like
features, elements, components or portions of the
illustrated system.
Detailed Description
Fig. 2 illustrates mailing system 201 embodying
the principles of the invention for franking postage onto
a given medium, e.g., a mailpiece, tape, etc. As shown
in Fig. 2, system 201 includes host device 250, postal
security device (PSD) 280 and printer 290. System 201
may be configured as an "open system," where host device
250 comprises a personal computer (PC), workstation or


CA 02272595 1999-OS-21
WO 99/16023 PCT/US98/19652
_7_
general purpose computing machine, and PSD 280 and
printer 290 serve as peripherals to host device 250.
System 201 may alternatively be. configured as a "closed
system," where host device 250 and printer 290 are
dedicated to the postage franking operation and typically
enclosed in the same casing, and where PSD 280 may or may
not be enclosed therein.
Without loss of generality, in this
illustrative embodiment, system 201 is configured as a
closed system. Central to host device 250 is processor
255 which is programmed to, among other things,
communicate and process data to effect postage franking
in accordance with the invention. Device 250 is
connected through printer interface 269 to printer 290
for controllably printing postage indicia onto a given
medium, which serve as a proof of postage. Printer 290
may incorporate well known laser, thermo transfer or
inkjet technology. Device 250 also includes
communications circuitry 261, serial interfaces 263 and
265, PCMCIA or serial (PCMCIA/serial) interface 267, user
interface 271, clock circuitry 272 and memory 273.
Communications circuitry 261 includes conventional modem
circuitry for establishing connections to communication
networks, e.g., the Internet. Serial interfaces 263 and
265 may be used for connection. with devices such as a
conventional optical scanner a.nd postage scale.
Interface 267 in this instance: is used for connection
with PSD 280 which is realized) as an integrated circuit
(IC) card or a "smart" module peripheral to device 250,
and user interface 271 for cor.~nection with a keypad (not
shown), a display (not shown) and/or an indicator device
such as a mouse (not shown) for user inputs. Clock
circuitry 272 keeps track of t:he current date and time
for system 201. Memory 273 is used to store data and
program routines for instructing processor 255 to perform
various functions. One such program routine may be a
postage franking routine described below for instructing


CA 02272595 1999-OS-21
WO 99/16023 PCT/US98/19652
_g_
processor 255 to carry out the postage franking operation
in accordance with the invention.
Referring to Fig. 3, PSD 280 includes PCMCIA
and/or serial (PCMCIA/serial) :interface 301 for
interfacing with and insertion into host device 250,
cryptographic processor 305, and secure memory 307. The
components in PSD 280 may be realized using a chip set of
the type of the NETARMOR VMS310 chip set manufactured by
VLSI Technology, Inc, or alternatively the chip set
typified by smart card technology.
Secure memory 307 which is a nonvolatile memory
includes a descending register and an ascending register.
In a conventional manner, the descending register is used
to keep track of an amount of postage available for
dispensation. On the other hand, the ascending register
is used to keep track of an amount of postage dispensed.
When the value of the descending register decreases over
time below a predetermined limit, system 201 can no
longer dispense postage until the descending register is
reset. Such a reset may be acli~ieved by way of electronic
funds transfer via a dial-up connection with a
computerized central facility 'using communications
circuitry 261, in accordance with a well-known telemeter
setting (TMS) technique.
In this particular illustrative embodiment,
secure memory 307 also includes a well known digital
signature algorithm (DSA), a private key and the
corresponding public key in accordance with the DSA. The
public key may be made available to the public in a PSD
certificate. For instance, using the DSA, cryptographic
processor 305 may sign specified postal data with the
private key to generate a digital signature to be
included in a postage indicium. The PSD certificate
containing the public key may also be provided in the
indicium for the postal authority to verify the digital
signature to authenticate the postage indicium.


CA 02272595 1999-OS-21
WO 99/16023 PCT/US98/19652
_g_
Fig. 4 illustrates postage indicium 400 which
serves as a proof of postage and is generated by system
201 in accordance with the inve=ntion. Indicium 400
includes human readable portion 405 and machine readable
portion 410. Portion 405 may :include information
concerning the date of mailing" postage, device ID,
origination town and zip code, mail class, etc. Machine
readable portion 410 may include one or more symbols
representing the postal data resquired by the postal
authority, and the digital signature for authenticating
the indicium as mentioned before. In this particular
illustrative embodiment, portion 410 includes multiple
symbols, e.g., data matrix symbols 415 and 420 in
accordance with the well known Data Matrix specification;
which jointly represent the required postal data. Such
postal data, for example, includes the device ID which
identifies system 201, ascending register value, postage,
digital signature, date of mailing, originating address
licensing zip code, software I1D which identifies
application software including the aforementioned postage
franking routine in system 201, descending register
value, PSD certificate, mail class (or rate category),
etc.
To expedite each postage franking transaction
especially where system 201 needs to handle a high volume
of mailpieces, the machine readable portion of a postage
indicium which includes at least one symbol is printed in
a pipeline fashion in accordance with the invention.
That is, in printing the symbol, as soon as new
information concerning a bit map for the print image of
the symbol is made available, printer 290 utilizes such
information to realize the symbol as much as possible.
To facilitate the pipeline operation, the layout of the
bit map is designed in such a way that the leading
portion of the bit map corresponds to those postal data
which can be determined without regard to any subsequent
postal data, which correspond to the remaining part of


CA 02272595 1999-OS-21
WO 99/16023 PCT/US98/19652
-10-
the bit map. To that end, processor 255 arranges the
postal data to be represented in such an order that those
postal data (e. g., the ascending and descending register
values) which need to be determined based on other postal
data (e. g., the postage) are disposed after such other
postal data in the bit map representation, thereby
obviating the need to modify the bit map as it is being
laid out and made available to printer 290 for printing.
We have recognized that of the required postal
data, some data elements such as the device ID,
originating address licensing :yip code, software ID and
PSD certificate are invariable with respect to system
201, and some other data elements such as the date of
mailing are invariable over a period of time, e.g., 24
hours, and the remaining data elements such as the
ascending register value, postage, descending register
value and mail class may vary :from one franking
transaction to another.
Thus, in particular, the invention embraces the
approach where a single symbol may be used in the machine
readable portion to represent .a combination of invariable
and variable postal data elements, with the invariable
postal data elements processed first and represented by
the leading portion of the sycribol, followed by the
variable postal data elements represented by the
remaining portion of the same symbol, as the invariable
postal data elements are independent of the subsequent,
variable postal data elements.
The invention also embraces a multi-symbol
approach where as illustrated in Fig. 4, machine readable
portion 410 includes at least two symbols, e.g., data
matrix symbols 415 and 420. One of the symbols may
represent only those invariable postal data elements.
Such a symbol is "invariable" or "fixed" by virtue of the
invariable postal data elements represented thereby, and
thus can be preset for printing in each franking
transaction. The other "varia.ble" symbol may represent


CA 02272595 1999-OS-21
WO 99/16023 PC'T/US98/19652
-11-
the remaining postal data elements which may vary from
transaction to transaction.
However, in this particular illustrative
embodiment, data matrix symbol 415 represents those
postal data elements which are invariable over at least a
period of time. For example, in addition to the
invariable postal data elements such as the device ID,
originating address licensing zip code, software ID and
PSD certificate, data matrix symbol 415 also represents
the date of mailing which changes daily. Notwithstanding
such, symbol 415 needs to be created only once per day
with the current mailing date and is then set in a print
memory for printing in each franking transaction for the
rest of the day. Thus, the creation of symbol 415 does
not consume real time during the franking transaction.
On the other hand, the creation of symbol 420
representing the remaining postal data elements which may
vary from transaction to transaction consumes real time.
Similarly, human readable portion 405 can be
divided into two parts, namely, a "fixed" part including,
e.g., information concerning the origination town and zip
code, device ID and date of mailing which is invariable
over at least a period of time:; and a "variable" part
including, e.g., information concerning the postage and
mail class which may vary from transaction to
transaction. The fixed part may be preset in the print
memory for printing, and the variable part may be created
in real time when the transaction occurs.
We have recognized certain advantages of the
multi-symbol approach over the: aforementioned single
symbol approach. As mentioned before, each data matrix
symbol includes error correction codewords to help ensure
scanning success of the communication of the data
represented thereby. In the multi-symbol approach, the
computation of the error correction codewords for symbol
415 representing invariable postal data elements is
completed prior to the franking transaction and does not


CA 02272595 1999-OS-21
WO 99/16023 PCT/US98/19652
-12~-
consume real time of the transaction. However, the
computation of the error correction codewords for symbol
420, which represents variable postal data elements and
is created during the franking transaction, consumes real
time. So does the computation of the error correction
codewords for a single symbol .representing both variable
and invariable postal data elements in the single symbol
approach. Nevertheless, the computation of the codewords
for symbol 420 in the multi-symbol approach is simpler as
the codewords afford error protection to fewer data
elements than that for a single symbol in the single
symbol approach. As a result, the multi-symbol approach
is more real-time efficient in computing error correction
codewords.
Other advantages of the multi-symbol approach
over the single symbol approach include the versatile
adaptability of multiple symbols into the required space
of machine readable portion 410. For example, data
matrix symbols 425 and 420 occupy relatively small square
spaces, respectively, with respect to the otherwise,
single symbol occupying a relatively large square space.
Because of the smaller sizes o~f symbols 415 and 420, they
can readily fit into the required space, e.g., a limited
rectangular space. In addition, because of the
availability of the few predetermined sizes of a data
matrix symbol corresponding to the maximum amounts of
data represented by the symbol., a single symbol may
assume a data matrix symbol having much unused data
capacity, thus wasting much space, and yet because of its
postal data amount needed to be represented, the single
symbol may not assume a smaller size. However, symbols
415 and 420 may assume data matrix symbols of different
sizes to maximize use of the data capacities afforded
thereby, and to save space at the same time.
Regardless of whether a single symbol or
multiple symbols are used to represent the required
postal data elements, because of the manipulation of the


CA 02272595 1999-OS-21
WO 99/16023 PCT/US98/19652
-13~-
order of the postal data elements, e.g., invariable
postal data elements followed loy the variable postal data
elements, in accordance with tine invention, the sequence
of the postal data elements represented by the single
symbol or multiple symbols when read may not match the
sequence expected by the posta:L authority. If that is
the case, each postal data element represented by the
single symbol or multiple symbols may be preceded by a
field identifier indicating the order of the data element
with respect to the sequence e;Kpected by the postal
authority.
Figs. 5A, 5B and 5C :illustrate the
aforementioned postage franking routine in accordance
with the invention. This routine includes (a) subroutine
503 in Fig. 5A for generating fixed data matrix symbol
415 and the fixed part of human readable portion 405,
representative of those postal data elements which are
unaffected by franking transactions, and (b) main routine
550 in Figs. 5B and 5C for franking postage indicium 400,
including generating variable data matrix symbol 420 and
the variable part of human readable portion 405,
representative of the remaining postal data elements
which may vary from one franking transaction to another.
Instructed by subroutine 503 in Fig. 5A,
processor 255 in system 201 detects any interrupt
concerning a change in the date of mailing which is a
required postal data element for postage indicium 400, as
indicated at step 513. Such an interrupt may be
automatically generated by clock circuitry 272 at the
beginning of each day, or caused by other date change
mechanisms or by a user input adjusting the mailing date
through user interface 271. When such an interrupt is
detected, processor 255 at step 516 assembles the data
concerning the new mailing date and other invariable
postal data elements corresponding to fixed data matrix
symbol 415 which are pre-stored in memory 273. At step
519, processor 255 computes th.e error correction


CA 02272595 1999-OS-21
WO 99/16023 PCT/US98/19652
-14--
codewords for the assembled data in accordance with a
well known error correction technique, e.g., the Reed-
Solomon error correction technique. Processor 255 at
step 521 then prepares a bit map for a print image of
fixed symbol 415 representing i:he assembled data and
error correction codewords just: computed which are
arranged in accordance with thE~ Data Matrix
specification. Processor 255 stores such a bit map in a
print memory which may be a part of memory 273, as
indicated at step 523. In addition, processor 255 at
step 527 assembles data concerning the new mailing date
and those invariable postal data elements corresponding
to the fixed part of human readable portion 405. At step
530, processor 255 prepares a ;second bit map for a print
image of the fixed human readable part based on the
assembled data. Processor 255 at step 533 stores the
second bit map in the print memory as well. Thus, during
a franking transaction, printer 290 can readily retrieve
from the print memory the preset bit maps for printing
data matrix symbol 415, and th~~ fixed part of human
readable portion 405.
In order to fully appreciate main routine 550
involving creation of variable data matrix symbol 420,
the generation of the aforementioned digital signature
which is also represented by symbol 420 will now be
described. In this illustrative embodiment, the required
postal data elements represented by machine readable
portion 410 are signed in accordance with a well known
cryptographic algorithm, e.g., the DSA. The resulting
digital signature whose representation is included in
symbol 420 is used for authentication of postage indicium
400.
The digital signature is composed of a first
signature value "r" which is 20 bytes long, and a second
signature value "s" which is also 20 bytes long. In
accordance with the DSA, the generation of the signature
value "r" involves generation of a random (or psuedo-


CA 02272595 1999-OS-21
WO 99/16023 PCT/US98/19652
-15-
random) integer "k" in each franking transaction. The
value "r" is a function of the integer "k" and certain
given DSA parameters, and independent of the postal data
elements to be signed. However, the generation of the
signature value "s" involves applying a secure hash
algorithm (SHA) onto the postal. data elements to be
signed. One such SHA is described in "Secure Hash
Standard," FIPS PUB 180-1, April 17, 1998. Specifically,
the signature value "s", dependent on the values of the
l0 postal data elements to be signed, may be expressed as
follows
s = (k-1 (SHA (M) + xr) ) mod q , [1]
where "k-1" represents the multiplicative inverse of the
random integer k; "M" represents the postal~data elements
to be signed onto which the SHA is applied; "x"
represents the value of the aforementioned private key
stored in secure memory 307; "~-" represents the
aforementioned first signature value; and "mod q"
represents a standard modulus operation having a base q,
which is one of the given DSA parameters.
Referring to Fig. SB,, instructed by main
routine 550, processor 255 for each franking transaction
causes cryptographic processor 305 in PSD 280 to generate
a random integer k, as indicated at step 553. Based on
the value of k, processor 305 at step 557 computes the
first signature value r which :is independent of the
values of the postal data elements to be signed, i.e., M
in expression [1]. In accordance with an aspect of the
invention, processor 305 at step 561 computes templ = k-1
and tempt = xr in expression [1] even before knowing the
actual mail class and postage to be dispensed which,
however, affects only M, and thus SHA(M), thereby gaining
some time to compute the second signature value s before
such actual mail class and postage become known.
In accordance with another aspect of the
invention, processor 305 further pre-computes candidates


CA 02272595 1999-OS-21
WO 99/16023 PCT/US98/19652
-16-
of the second signature value s based on one or more
predicted mail classes and postage values to be
dispensed, as indicated at step 564. Such predicted mail
classes and postage values are formed in pairs based on
statistics concerning past usage of mail classes and
postage. In this example, system 201 uses three
predicted mail class/postage pairs, which are the last
mail class and postage actually dispensed by system 201,
and the two most statistically likely mail class/postage
pairs, e.g., first class mail/32~ and first class
mail/55G, where 32G and 55~ correspond to the two lowest
weight limits of the first class mail. Once the unknown
mail class and postage to be dLispensed is assumed to be a
prediction thereof, all of the: variable postal data
elements including the postage, ascending register value,
descending register value and mail class are defined.
Accordingly, M in expression I.1], which represents all of
the required postal data elements represented by machine
readable portion 410, including the variable postal data
elements, is also defined. In this instance, processor
305 pre-computes three "s" candidates corresponding to
the respective predictions in accordance with expression
[1] .
As soon as processor 255 detects the actual
mail class and postage entry by a user through user
interface 271, processor 255 determines whether the
actual postage and mail class just entered match any of
the predictions, as indicated at step 566. If it is
determined that the mail class and postage entry matches
one of the predictions, proce:asor 255 causes processor
305 to select the "s" candidate corresponding to the
matched prediction for use as the actual second signature
value, as indicated at step 569, thereby expediting the
postage franking transaction. Otherwise, if it is
determined that the mail claw and postage entry does not
match any prediction, processor 255 causes processor 305
to compute the actual second ;signature value based on the


CA 02272595 1999-OS-21
WO 99/16023 PCT/US98/19652
_17_.
mail class and postage entry, and the pre-computed tempi
and tempt above, in accordance with expression [1], as
indicated at step 571.
As previously mentioned, the franking operation
is performed by system 201 purs3uant to the inventive
pipeline approach. With the but map of fixed symbol 415
preset in the print memory as described before, as soon
as processor 255 detects a signal (e.g., from a
conventional mail feeder (not shown) connected to system
201, or user interface 271) requesting printing of a
postage indicium, say, indicium 400, corresponding to the
aforementioned mail class and postage entry, processor
255 causes printer 290 to stari~ printing fixed symbol 415
advantageously without latency, as indicated at step 572.
While symbol 415 is being printed, processor
255 is creating variable symbol 420 and the variable part
of human readable portion 405, taking advantage of the
print time for symbol 415. Specifically, referring to
Fig. 5C, processor 255 at step 573 causes cryptographic
processor 305 to provide thereto (a) the ascending
register value and (b) the descending register value,
taking into account the current dispensed postage, and
(c) the digital signature which is composed of the
aforementioned first signature value from step 557 and
second signature value from step 569 or step 571. At
step 576, processor 255 computes error correction
codewords for the digital signature and the variable
postal data elements including the postage, mail class,
and ascending and descending register values received by
processor 255, in accordance with a well known error
correction technique, e.g., the Reed-Solomon error
correction technique. At step 579, processor 255
prepares a bit map for a print image of variable symbol
420 representing such digital signature, variable postal
data elements and error correction codewords which are
arranged in accordance with the Data Matrix


CA 02272595 1999-OS-21
WO 99/16023 PCT/US98/19652
_lg_
specification. At step 581, processor 255 transfers the
resulting bit map to the print memory.
In addition, processor 255 at step 583 prepares
another bit map for a print image of the variable part of
human readable portion 405 including the dispensed
postage and mail class. At step 585, processor 255
transfers the resulting bit map to the print memory as
well. As soon as fixed symbol 415 is printed, at step
587, processor 255 causes printer 290 to start printing
symbol 420, followed by human readable portion 405, based
on the respective bit maps in the print memory, thereby
realizing postage indicium 400.
As mentioned before, the use of additional data
matrix symbols to represent the same amount of data
enables one to reduce the size of individual symbols.
However, in the event that the number of symbols used is
limited, and the size of at least one of the symbols is
larger than the print coverage of a printhead (not shown)
of printer 290, the oversize symbol cannot be printed in
a single pass of the printhead., incurring at least a
second pass thereof to complete the oversize symbol.
Such multiple passes of the printhead, versus a single
pass thereof, to realize machine readable portion 410
undesirably reduce significantly the speed of the postage
franking operation.
Referring back to Figs. lA and 1B, as described
before, a data matrix symbol, e.g, data matrix symbol
100, includes four finder patterns (collectively denoted
150) for data regions I, II, I:II and IV, respectively.
We have recognized that if data matrix symbol 100 is
oversize and needs to be divided into segments for
printing in a manner described below, an innocuous way to
divide it is to separate data regions I and II from
regions III and IV by solid arrays 155 and 165 of the
finder patterns for data regions I and II, respectively.
Fig. 6 illustrates the resulting segmented data matrix
symbol, denoted 600. As shown in Fig. 6, symbol 600


CA 02272595 1999-OS-21
WO 99/16023 PCT/US98/19652
_1g_.
includes upper symbol segment 610 and lower symbol
segment 620. Except for solid arrays 155 and 165 which
no longer appear in symbol 600 and are replaced by an
inter-segment gap having a width G, which is exaggerated
for illustrative purposes, symbol 100 is identical to
symbol 600. In any event, the missing solid arrays 155
and 165 from symbol 100 are inconsequential to the
determination of the size and distortion of symbol 100
using the remaining finder pati~erns. Thus, for data
communications, symbol 600, evE:n with its inter-segment
gap narrower than G, is equiva:Lent to symbol 100.
In accordance with the invention, in printing
an oversize data matrix symbol, a printhead assembly
comprising multiple printheads is used to print the
symbol in a single pass of the assembly to maintain the
high efficiency of the postage franking operation. Fig.
7 illustrates printhead assembly 700 in accordance with
the invention which includes p:rintheads 703 and 705,
which are connected and arranged (or ganged) close to
each other in the assembly. As shown in Fig. 7, the
leading edge 711 of printhead 703 is aligned with the
leading edge 713 of printhead 705. Assembly 700 is
controlled by printer 290 to print in direction A to
realize an oversize data matrix symbol, say, symbol 100,
where the length of the symbol is longer than each of the
length yl of the print coverage by printhead 703 and the
length y2 of the print coverage by printhead 705.
In practice, in assembly 700 printhead 703 is
inevitably separated from printhead 705 by a separation.
Without sacrificing the data integrity of oversize symbol
100, in accordance with the invention, assembly 700
generates a version of symbol 600, instead, which is
equivalent to symbol 100. Specifically, printhead 703
controllably prints symbol segment 610 while printhead
705 controllably prints symbol segment 620, with the
width of the otherwise solid arrays 155 and 165 provides
the tolerance for the separation between printheads 703


CA 02272595 1999-OS-21
WO 99/16023
PCT/US98/19652
-20--
and 705. In other words, the :separation between
printheads 703 and 705 is made to fall within gap G in
Fig. 6, and is denoted G', which is also exaggerated in
Fig. 7. In effect, gap G is provided to compensate for
mechanical tolerance and the alignment of printheads 703
and 705.
It should be noted at: this point that in
accordance with the Data Matrix specification, each data
matrix symbol can be realized in either a "dark on light"
format or a "light on dark" format, representing
identical information including the finder patterns. For
example, symbol 100 is illustrated in Fig. 1 in a "dark
on light" format. Its "light on dark" counterpart has
each light module in symbol 100 become a dark module and
conversely each dark module be<:ome a light module. In
particular, the solid arrays in the "light on dark"
counterpart consists of light modules or blanks. As
such, print assembly 700 is particularly advantageous to
realize data matrix symbols in the "light on dark"
format, with the separation G' between printheads 703 and
705 effectuating the solid arr<~ys therein which are
naturally blank.
Similarly, printhead assembly 700 may also be
used to print an oversize human readable portion,
although the data integrity there is much less
susceptible to any misalignment of printheads 703 and 705
in the assembly.
Fig. 8 illustrates another segmented data
matrix symbol 800 equivalent t~o oversize symbol 100.
Symbol 800 is designed for those printers which print in
direction B, as opposed to direction A in Fig. 7.
Similarly, the printhead assembly (not shown) for
generating a version of symbol 800 includes first and
second printheads separated from each other by a
separation G'. The first printhead controllably prints
symbol segment 810 and the second printhead controllably
prints symbol segment 820, with the separation G' falling


CA 02272595 1999-OS-21
WO 99/16023 PCT/US98/19652
-21--
within gap G (also exaggerated for illustrative purposes)
of symbol 800, where gap G coincides with the otherwise
solid arrays of oversize symbol 100.
The foregoing merely illustrates the principles
of the invention. It will thug be appreciated that those
skilled in the art will be able to devise various
modifications or alterations which, although different
from the exemplary embodiments described herein, are
within the scope as defined by the appended claims.
For example, in the disclosed embodiment, data
matrix symbols are used to illustrate the principles of
the invention. However, it wi:Ll be appreciated that
other barcodes such as PDF 417 barcodes, or other similar
segmenting image presentations, stacked codes or symbols
representative of information may be used, instead, to
implement the invention.
In addition, in the disclosed embodiment, the
bit map for a print image representing data is
illustratively generated in host device 250. However, it
will be appreciated that alternatively the data will be
provided by device 250 in the form of image vectors to
printer 290, in accordance with a printer protocol or
printer control language. Printer 290 will then generate
the bit map based on the received image vectors.
Moreover, in the disclosed embodiment, machine
readable portion 410 illustratively includes multiple
symbols which are readable by a scanner. It will be
appreciated that in accord with the invention, the
multiple symbols as a whole will be scanned only once by
the scanner, and the presence of the multiple symbols
will be recognized by the single pass of the scan. The
scanner will then decode each individual symbol to
recover the postal information represented thereby.
Finally, the illustrative embodiment of the
invention is disclosed herein in a form in which the
various data processing functions are performed by
discrete functional blocks. These functional blocks may


CA 02272595 1999-OS-21
WO 99/16023 PCT/US98/19652
-22-
be implemented in various ways and combinations using
logic circuitry and/or appropriately programmed
processors, as will be known to those skilled in the art.

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date 2005-06-21
(86) PCT Filing Date 1998-09-21
(87) PCT Publication Date 1999-04-01
(85) National Entry 1999-05-21
Examination Requested 1999-09-27
(45) Issued 2005-06-21
Deemed Expired 2017-09-21

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Application Fee $300.00 1999-05-21
Request for Examination $400.00 1999-09-27
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 1999-09-29
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 2 2000-09-21 $100.00 2000-09-19
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 3 2001-09-21 $100.00 2001-09-19
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 4 2002-09-23 $100.00 2002-08-28
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 5 2003-09-22 $150.00 2003-09-17
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 6 2004-09-21 $200.00 2004-09-09
Final Fee $300.00 2005-03-21
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 7 2005-09-21 $200.00 2005-08-22
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 8 2006-09-21 $200.00 2006-08-24
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 9 2007-09-21 $200.00 2007-08-23
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 10 2008-09-22 $250.00 2008-08-25
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 11 2009-09-21 $250.00 2009-09-10
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 12 2010-09-21 $250.00 2010-09-09
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 13 2011-09-21 $250.00 2011-09-08
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 14 2012-09-21 $250.00 2012-09-07
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 15 2013-09-23 $450.00 2013-09-09
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 16 2014-09-22 $450.00 2014-09-05
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 17 2015-09-21 $450.00 2015-09-04
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
ASCOM HASLER MAILING SYSTEMS, INC.
Past Owners on Record
BROOKNER, GEORGE M.
NACLERIO, EDWARD
SCHWARTZ, ROBERT G.
ZUIDEMA, ERIC
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Representative Drawing 1999-09-23 1 8
Description 2003-03-18 22 1,119
Claims 2003-03-18 3 111
Claims 2003-11-10 4 128
Description 1999-05-21 22 1,118
Cover Page 1999-09-23 2 68
Drawings 1999-09-22 9 167
Abstract 1999-05-21 1 54
Claims 1999-05-21 12 432
Drawings 1999-05-21 7 147
Claims 2004-07-05 4 130
Representative Drawing 2005-05-26 1 9
Cover Page 2005-05-26 1 47
Prosecution-Amendment 2004-01-26 3 84
Fees 2004-09-09 1 30
Assignment 1999-05-21 3 94
PCT 1999-05-21 1 38
Correspondence 1999-07-05 1 32
Prosecution-Amendment 1999-09-22 10 200
Prosecution-Amendment 1999-09-27 1 38
Assignment 1999-09-29 5 186
Prosecution-Amendment 2002-09-18 11 457
Prosecution-Amendment 2003-03-18 8 311
Prosecution-Amendment 2003-04-09 2 49
Prosecution-Amendment 2003-05-14 3 81
Fees 2003-09-17 1 28
Prosecution-Amendment 2003-11-10 8 287
Fees 2000-09-19 1 26
Fees 2002-08-28 1 32
Fees 2001-09-19 1 26
Prosecution-Amendment 2004-07-05 7 252
Correspondence 2005-03-21 1 34