Language selection

Search

Patent 2293906 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2293906
(54) English Title: METHOD OF MAKING, CLEANING, SCOURING, SANDING AND/OR POLISHING PADS AND THE IMPROVED PAD PRODUCED THEREBY
(54) French Title: METHODE DE FABRICATION, NETTOYAGE, RECURAGE, PONCAGE ET/OU POLISSAGE DE TAMPON AMELIORE
Status: Dead
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • A47L 13/16 (2006.01)
  • A47L 17/08 (2006.01)
  • B24B 29/00 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • MATTESKY, HENRY (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • MAGLA WORLD WIDE, LTD. (United States of America)
(71) Applicants :
  • MAGLA WORLD WIDE, LTD. (United States of America)
(74) Agent: GOUDREAU GAGE DUBUC
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(22) Filed Date: 2000-01-06
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 2000-07-07
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
60/115,021 United States of America 1999-01-07

Abstracts

English Abstract




It has been found that the aggressiveness of the abrading surface of
a scrubbing pad can be affected by the way that the surface of the pad is
cut. This approach leads to a substantial cost saving of materials utilized in
the abrading, as well as giving excellent control over is abrading nature.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.




8
CLAIMS:
1. A process for the production of a foam plastic scouring,
cleaning, sanding or polishing pad, said pad being formed from a pliable,
flexible open celled foamed plastic material which comprises the steps of:
a) tearing a surface of the foam,
b) providing a sufficient amount of curable coating to said torn
surface to cover all of said torn surface and provide a pad of predetermined
surface roughness and
c) curing said coating.
2. The process of claim 1 comprising tearing the surface to a
random depth of at least 1.5 and not more than 9 cell diameters relative to
the surface made by a substantially planar cut,
3. The process of claim 1 which comprises providing said
coating to said torn surface, so that said coating penetrates to a mean level
of at
least 2 cell diameters below the actual surface,
4. The process of claim 2 which comprises providing said
coating to said torn surface so that said coating penetrates to a mean level
of at
least 2 cell diameters below the actual surface without pooling,
5. The process of claim 1 wherein the coating is an adhesive
coating.
6. The process of claim 5
a) additionally comprising the step of
b) providing a predetermined amount of abrasive material of
predetermined roughness to said adhesive prior to curing.



9
7. The process of claim 1 wherein step (a) is carried out by
cutting the foam with a knurled wire.
8. The process of claim 1 wherein step (a) is carried out by
abrading the substantially planar surface of the foam.
9. The process of claim 6 wherein the abrasive material is present
in the adhesive at the time of application to said surface of said foam.
10. The process of claim 6 wherein the abrasive material is fed
to the adhesive after the time of application to said surface of said foam.
11. The process of claim 6 wherein the abrasive material is
selected from the group consisting of: calcium carbonate. glass
microspheres, silica sand, aluminum oxide and silicon carbide.
12. The process of claim 6 wherein the abrasive material is of a
Mohr's hardness of from 3 to 9.
13. A foam plastic scouring, cleaning, sanding or polishing pad
of a pliable, flexible open celled foamed plastic material treated in
accordance with the procedures of Claim 1.
14. A foam plastic scouring, cleaning, sanding or polishing pad of
a pliable, flexible open-celled foam plastic having 10 cells to 100 cells per
inch, made in accordance with the process of claim 1.
15. A foam plastic scouring, cleaning, sanding or polishing pad
of a pliable, flexible open celled foamed plastic material treated in
accordance with the procedures of claim 6.



10
16. A foam plastic scouring, cleaning, sanding or polishing pad of
a pliable, flexible open-celled foam plastic having 10 cells to 100 cells per
inch, made in accordance with the process of claim 6.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.



CA 02293906 2000-02-08
000104 RV6 1 MAGL 3.0-300
METHOD OF MAKING, CLEANING, SCOURING, SANDING AND/OR
POLISHING PADS AND THE IMPROVED PAD PRODUCED THEREBY
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
Domestic foam based cleaning pads, including household and
5 commercial scrubbers and sanders normally used wet and abrasive and
sanding blocks normally used dry.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The combination of synthetic foams, particularly urethane forms, with
10 at least one abrasive surface is well-known and pads of this type have been
on the market for at least 20 years.
Processes for making such pads may be found, for example, in US
Patent 4,111,666 to Kalbow and US Patent 4,263,337 to Fenster, et al.
15 Nevertheless, the art always seeks methods of making such devices more
economically and with the ability to provide a large variety of abrasive
surfaces without major changes in the equipment required to build the
same.
20 The foams utilized for such pads are usually polyurethane foams of
open-celled structure. Conventionally; the abrasive quality of the abrading
surface of such pads has been controlled solely by the nature of the
abrasive material, which has been applied to the surface of the pad selected
for this purpose.
25
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It has been found that the aggressiveness of the abrading surface of
a scrubbing pad can be affected by the way that the surface of the pad is
cut. This approach leads to a substantial cost saving of materials utilized
for
30 the abrading, as well as giving excellent control over is abrading nature.


CA 02293906 2000-02-08
000104 RV6 2 MAGL 3.0-300
The basis of Applicants' invention lies in their finding that if, contrary
to general cu«ent practice, the surface of the foam substrate which is to be
used as an abrasive surface is not cut smoothly, but is slightly torn,
suitably
to a random depth of at feast 1-1/2 but not more than 9 cell diameters
relative to the surface made by a substantially planar cut, there remains in
that surface a desirable number of fiber-like residues from the cells. The
torn surface is then coated, suitably with an adhesive which may, if desired,
contain an abrasive material. If desired, the adhesive material can be
applied per se, and thereafter the abrasive is applied to the surface of the
adhesive, which is then cured. The coating, without abrasive content, may
be applied to the torn surface.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
The starting material for the present invention is a block of
substantially open-celled urethane foam with an I.L.D. of at least 30 pounds
or more, preferably 50 pounds, with good tear resistance, which is
conventionally utilized for sponge material. A particularly suitable sponge
material is disclosed in Applicants' PCT Patent Application No.
PCT/US98/08605, filed April 27, 1998, although any commercial urethane
foam or other foams, including rubber foams may be used. The blocks of
foam are treated to provide at least one roughened surface, the treatment
may be carried out with an abrasive cutting tool on a given surface.
Preferably, the block may be cut with a knurled wire, such as that
manufactured by Albrecht Baumer KG, Freudenberg, Germany. These wires
have angled toothing set with broaching tooth.
Utilizing either of the aforementioned means, there is produced a
single surface or a double surface, or up to six surfaces which are randomly
torn (relative to an original planar cut), suitably of at least 1.5 and not
more
than 9 cell diameters. A less aggressive cut generally does not leave a
.........~_~...a.......r...~.._ .....~..._.~.~~.,..,.,~.,..~..,,..,....__.. .
.._._.-..,~..,.._.-___ .... ....... __....~..~....w.w,~...._.~...~.....-
_._....._.......~..~..T__.__......


CA 02293906 2000-02-08
000104 RV6 3 MAGL 3.0-300
sufficient number of hair-like projections or jagged cell membranes to
provide the optimum effect and a deeper cut has a similar effect.
The jagged cell membrane residues and hairline-like projections, with
5 a cured coating, which may originally be adhesive, but does not need to be,
have a mild abrasive quality of their own, particularly in a household
scrubber sponge. More importantly, these projections increase the available
surface area for the application of abrasive materials, which allow more
effective loading of the abrasives.
10
After cutting, the abrasive surface is coated, suitably with a curable
adhesive. Such adhesives are well-known in the art. A suitable example is
Swift 22005, manufactured by Reichhold Chemical. Similar adhesives are
described in US Patents 4,264,337 and 4,111,666.
15
There are many possible methods of applying the adhesive coating,
namely by spray knife or roller, the latter being preferred. The actual
amount applied is dependent on the foam cell size and the ultimate
properties desired but for the best results the coating is applied so as to
20 fully coat each projection and beyond to a depth of at least 2 cell
diameters.
Care is taken so that the porosity of the foam is minimally reduced and
preferably the coating does not pool between the projections. In this way,
the scrubber or sanding sponge produced has a brush-like quality to its
surface and the bristle-like protuberances are stiffened and reinforced.
25
Abrasives can be added to the adhesive and/or added as a surface
treatment after application of the adhesive, but prior to cure by vibratory or
other feeding devices. The coated scrubber is conveyed under a vibratory
feeder a nd the abrasive is °sprinkled on", coating each bristle or
ruptured
30 cell wall. The scrubber is cured and the excess abrasive vacuumed off and
recycled


CA 02293906 2000-02-08
000104 RV6 4 MAGL 3.0-300
Depending upon the final application, a variety of abrasives known to
those skilled in the art can be useful, suitably in a Mohr hardness range of
3-9. A non-scratch scrubber suitable for non-stick cookware or counter-
tops, may use no abrasive or incorporate an amount of calcium carbonate,
suitably about 1-400 mesh, preferably 200 mesh in the adhesive. A
spackling sponge rubber may use a glass microspheres, suitably #3000
(Potters Industry), surfaced coated on the uncured foam at the rate of, say
50-300, suitably 120 gms per square yard. A barbecue grill scrubber might
use a 180-mesh silicon carbide, suitably 100-300 mesh, preferably 180
mesh abrasive at the rate of 200 gms per square yard. Silica sand and
aluminum oxide may also be used. Adhesive amount, abrasive type , mesh
size, and amount, if any, are very dependent on the foam cell size and
aggressiveness desired.
The following examples are given for purposes of illustration and not
limitation.
..... ..r..~..~..~.... ... .._ . ..........~w.~.d.~,.,..,~,~...~~...~w_...._..


CA 02293906 2000-02-08
000104 RV6 5 MAGL 3.0-300
EXAMPLES
In the foregoing examples the starting material is a polyurethane foam
of average density of 1-1.3 and average cell size of 10-100 cells per inch.
The abrasive surface was obtained by cutting with a #15 cutting wire,
5 manufactured by Albrecht Baumer KG, Freudenberg, Germany. This wire
having a tooth size of 1.5 ml.
XSORB SCRUBBERS
FORMULATION OF TOP COATING
MATERIAL PART BLUE GREEN SPACKLING
# ALL HEAVY SPONGE
PURPOSE DUTY AMOUNT
AMOUNT AMOUNT


Swift-22005 058390030.OIbs.30.OIbs 30.OIbs.


C-55 Camel 05131009.0 Ibs.9.0 Ibs. 6.0 Ibs.
Carb


Milliken Blue0584700140 gms.)(40 gms.)(159 gms.)
X-3


Milliken Yellow0585000-- (34 gms.)(41 gms.)
X-15


TOTAL 39.1 39.2 Ibs.36.4 Ibs.
Ibs.


Procedure for All Purpose and Heavy Dutx
To a 5-gallon pail, add Swift 22005 and C-55; mix for approximately
3-5 minutes. Add dye and mix for 5 minutes. Charge roller coater with
coating compound and set coater for maximum penetration and an
15 application rate of 91 gms. per foam sheet of 22-1/2 x 34. Pass foam sheet
through coater two times. Final coating weight is 190-210 gms. per sheet.
The blue all-purpose scrubber coated sheets are placed in racks and air
cured for 48 hours. The green heavy-duty sheets are run through the
abrasive applicator and 115 gms. of Arrowblast 100 grit is applied, and the
sheets are placed in racks and air cured for 48 hours.
r - .-.w..,~, ~..._- .....-.,~...a.._...,~..~ .. ......_....._r_wwM~_,~",M..


CA 02293906 2000-02-08
000104 RV6 6 MAGL 3.0-300
Procedure for Spacklin_g Sponge
To a 5-gallon pail, add Swift 2205 and dye, mix for approximately 5
minutes. Charge roller coater with coating compound and set coater for
maximum penetration at an application rate as follows:
Sheet Dimension - 1 " x 27" x 34-1 /2" - 120 gms./sheet
- 1-3/4" x 23" x 34-1/2" - 100 gms./sheet Pass foam
through coater two times for a final coating of:
Sheet Dimension - 1 " x 27" x 34-1 /2" - 260 gms.lsheet
- 1-3/4" x 23" x 34-1/2" - 280 gms./sheet
10 The sheets are run through the abrasive applicator and Microspheres 3000,
Potters Ind. is applied per the following schedule:
Sheet Dimension - 1 " x 27" x 34-1 /2" - 104 gms.
- 1-3/4" x 23" x 34-1/2" - 90 gms.
The sheets are placed in racks and air-cured for 48 hours.
Procedure for a Sanding Block
Sanding blocks of various grades may use an aluminum oxide
abrasive of 30 mesh, 60 mesh, 80 mesh, 100 mesh, 120 mesh, 150 or 200
mesh. One suitable foam would be polyurethane foam of 1.835/cu.ft., an
I.L.D. of 55 and cell size of 55 cells per linear inch.
Charge roller coater with Swift 20026, a urethane moisture cure
adhesive by Reichold Chemical and set coater for maximum penetration at
an application rate as follows:
Sheet Dimension - 1 " x 18" x 18"
Sample A - 145 gms
Sample B - 130 gms
The sheets are run through the abrasive applicator and Microspheres 3000,
Potters Ind., is applied per the following schedule:
Sample A - 100 mesh aluminum oxide - 80 gms/sheet
Sample B - 80 mesh aluminum oxide - 160 gmslsheet


CA 02293906 2000-02-08
000104 RV6 7 MAGL 3.0-300
The sheets are placed in racks and air-cured for 48 hours.
On curing, the sheets are cut into pieces 5" x 3" x 1 ". When
sanding, it is observed that the wood flour produced does not remain on the
5 abrasive face but penetrates into the surface of the foam to a depth to
which the form was originally torn/cut. A light tap of the abrasive block
discharges the wood flour from the foam block. Commercial sanding
sponges utilize urethane foam having a relatively smooth surface. This
surface being adhesive coated. The abrasive applied to this surface yields a
10 non-porous, essentially one-dimensional surface. In use, these sanding
sponges while effective, allow the buildup of wood flour or debris on the
abrasive surface reducing their efficiency. The debris is difficult to remove.
Sample A was found to have a very open surface structure and very
15 abrasive feel due to the rough foam surface and abrasive coating.
Comparable sanding blocks are relatively smoother feeling in comparison.
Sample B was found to have an open structure less than A due to a
heavier abrasive loading.
20
It should be noted that foams of various cell sizes are useful. Foams
of large pore sizes or less cells per inch to better accommodate abrasives of
larger particle size and still maintain the advantages of open structure and
vice versa, although it should be noted that foams of large pore size and
25 fine abrasives and foams of small pore size and coarse abrasives have
utility
in some applications.
~...........~"~.....~..~..~...._.........~..,~.."...,.~. ,....
_.....~"~...~.~..m.~..~......,~.... . ~._.......~~.....~_..... . _.._.~-
~...~_...w..._...,..~....

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 2293906 was not found.

Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date Unavailable
(22) Filed 2000-01-06
(41) Open to Public Inspection 2000-07-07
Dead Application 2003-01-06

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2002-01-07 FAILURE TO PAY APPLICATION MAINTENANCE FEE

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Application Fee $300.00 2000-01-06
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 2000-02-08
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
MAGLA WORLD WIDE, LTD.
Past Owners on Record
MATTESKY, HENRY
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Abstract 2000-02-08 1 27
Cover Page 2000-06-27 1 23
Abstract 2000-01-06 1 12
Description 2000-01-06 7 261
Claims 2000-01-06 3 73
Abstract 2000-02-08 1 10
Description 2000-02-08 7 223
Claims 2000-02-08 3 63
Correspondence 2000-01-26 1 2
Assignment 2000-01-06 3 92
Correspondence 2000-02-08 12 323
Assignment 2000-02-08 2 104
Assignment 2000-02-08 2 105