Language selection

Search

Patent 2305529 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2305529
(54) English Title: LAUNDRY TREATMENT PRODUCTS FOR SPANDEX CONTAINING FABRICS
(54) French Title: PRODUITS DE TRAITEMENT POUR LE LAVAGE DU LINGE DESTINES A DES TISSUS A BASE DE SPANDEX?
Status: Deemed expired
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C11D 3/50 (2006.01)
  • C11D 17/00 (2006.01)
  • D06M 13/00 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • PERRING, KEITH DOUGLAS (United Kingdom)
  • CLEMENTS, CHRISTOPHER FRANCIS (United Kingdom)
  • MACMASTER, ANGUS PETER (United Kingdom)
  • LAROCHE, CHARLES (France)
(73) Owners :
  • UNILEVER PLC (United Kingdom)
(71) Applicants :
  • UNILEVER PLC (United Kingdom)
(74) Agent: BERESKIN & PARR LLP/S.E.N.C.R.L.,S.R.L.
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2008-07-29
(86) PCT Filing Date: 1998-10-09
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 1999-04-22
Examination requested: 2003-08-14
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/GB1998/003053
(87) International Publication Number: WO1999/019452
(85) National Entry: 2000-03-31

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
9721586.7 United Kingdom 1997-10-10

Abstracts

English Abstract




A fabric treatment product containing a perfume which includes a mixture of
fragrance materials, for the treatment of garments
containing Spandex ® and other fibres, preferably after wearing thereof,
to deposit fragrance materials to a greater extent on the Spandex ®
fibres than on the other fibres. The fabric treatment product may be selected
from a detergent composition for fabric washing, a pre-treatment
composition, a rinse conditioner, or an additive composition for use with any
of these.


French Abstract

Cette invention concerne un produit de traitement pour des tissus qui contient un parfum contenant un mélange de matériaux de parfum; ce produit étant destiné au traitement de vêtements contenant du Spandex3 et d'autres fibres, de préférence après que les vêtements aient été portés, pour déposer les matériaux de parfum de manière plus importante sur les fibres Spandex3 que sur les autres fibres. Le produit de traitement pour des tissus peut être sélectionné entre une composition détergente destinée au lavage des tissus, une composition de prétraitement, un produit de rinçage ou une composition de produit d'addition destiné à être utilisée avec n'importe laquelle de ces compositions ou produits.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.




34
CLAIMS


1. A fabric treatment product which includes a perfume
composition which is a mixture of fragrance materials
which deposits preferentially on spandex fibers, wherein
the perfume composition contains at least 50% by weight
in total of the perfume composition of fragrance
materials selected from both Categories A and B:
Category A) hydroxylic materials which are alcohols,
phenols or salicylates, with an octanol/water partition
coefficient (P) whose common logarithm (log10P) is 2.5 or
greater, and a gas chromatographic Kovats index (as
determined on polydimethylsiloxane as non-polar
stationary phase) of at least 1050 and not more than
1600, and

Category B) ester, ethers, nitriles, ketones or
aldehydes, with an octanol/water partition coefficient
(P) whose common logarithm (log10P) is 2.5 or greater, and
a gas chromatographic Kovats index (as determined on
polydimethylsiloxane as non-polar stationary phase) of at
least 1300 and not more than 1600.

2. A fabric treatment product according to claim 1
which is a laundry treatment product.

3. A fabric treatment product according to claim 2
which is selected from detergent compositions, presoak



35

compositions, rinse conditioners and fabric softening
sheets.

4. A fabric treatment product according to claim 3
which is a detergent composition containing a detersive
surfactant in an amount from 2% to 50% by weight of the
detergent composition, and a detergency builder in an
amount from 5% to 80% by weight of the detergent
composition.

5. A fabric treatment product according to claim 1
formulated as a spray.

6. A fabric treatment product according to claim 1
formulated as a solid carrier material impregnated with
the perfume composition.

7. A method of treating a garment containing spandex
fibers which comprises contacting the garment with fabric
treatment product according to any one of claims 1 to 6.
8. A method according to claim 7 for sustaining a
presence of deposited fragrance materials on the garment,
wherein the garment is one which had in a previous
treatment been contacted with a perfume composition as
defined in any one of claims 1 to 6.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.



CA 02305529 2000-03-31

WO 99/19452 PCT/GB98/03053
LAUNDRY TREATMENT PRODUCTS FOR SPANDEX CONTAINING FABRICS

This invention relates to the treatment of
textiles containing spandex fibres.

At the present time, many garments are made
from fabric which contains a mixture of fibres, a
proportion of which are elastic, so that the fabric
has the ability to stretch and to recover from
stretch. Spandex fibres are commonly used for this
purpose. The term "Spandex" has been adopted as a

generic term by the United States Federal Trade
Commission to denote a manufactured fibre in which the
fibre-forming substance is a long chain synthetic
polymer composed of at least 85 s of a segmented
polyurethane. A discussion of such fibres can be found

in "History of Spandex Elastomeric Fibres" by A.J.
Ultee, which is a chapter starting at page 278 in Man-
Made Fibres: Their Origin and Development, edited by
R.V. Seymour and R.S. Porter, Elsevier 1993. Spandex
fibres are also referred to as "elastane" or

"elasthane" fibres.

Another discussion of such fibres'is found
under the heading "Segmented Polyurethanes" at page
613 of Handbook of Textile Fibres by J. Gordon Cook,
5th Ed. Merrow Publishing Company 1984. Further

description of elastanes and their applications can be


CA 02305529 2000-03-31

WO 99/19452 PCT/GB98/03053
2
found in "Synthesefasern: Grundlagen, Technologie,
Verarbeitung und Anwendung", B von Falkei (editor),
Verlag Chemie (1981). Commercially available elastanes
are well known, in particular as sold under the name

LYCRA , a registered trade mark of DuPont de Nemours
and Company. Patents relating to such fibres include
US-A-5000899, US-A-5288779 and US-A-5362432.

The deposition of perfume onto garments and
other fabrics during laundering has been established
for many years. Perfume is incorporated into laundry

products such as detergent compositions for fabric
washing and rinse conditioners for softening the
fabrics.

Although the perfume serves to cover the
base odour of such a product and to give the unused
product an attractive fragrance, it also deposits on
the fabric.

Certain perfumes have the ability to provide
deodorant action against body odour, either when

directly applied to human skin, or when included in a
laundry product. Such perfumes are described in EP-B-
3172, US-A-4304679, US-A-4278658, US-A-4134838, US-A-
4288341 and US-A-4289641, US-A-5482635 and US-A-

5554588.


CA 02305529 2000-03-31

WO 99/19452 PCT/GB98/03053
3
Summary of the Invent;nn

We have now found that a number of fragrance
materials used in perfumery are able to deposit and
then be retained better on spandex fibres than on a

number of other textile fibres.

Therefore in one aspect the present
invention provides a fabric treatment product which
has a mixture of fragrance materials, for the
treatment of garments containing spandex and other

fibres, preferably after wearing thereof, to deposit
fragrance materials to a greater extent on the spandex
fibres than on the other fibres.

The invention may, in particular, be applied
when the garment fabric was pretreated with perfume

prior to first wearing of the garment. Thus, use in
accordance with the invention may be use of a fabric
treatment product which contains the perfume
composition to treat garments containing spandex
fibres, the fabric of which garments was treated with

a perfume composition (which may be a preferentially-
deposited such composition) prior to first wearing, so
that the said use of a fabric treatment product
sustains a presence of fragrance materials on the
garments.

In a related second aspect, the invention
provides a method of treating and maintaining a


CA 02305529 2000-03-31

WO 99/19452 PCT/GB98/03053
4
garment containing spandex and other fibres,

comprising contacting the fabric of the garment with
a perfume composition which is a mixture of fragrance
materials, so that fragrance materials are deposited

on the fabric and subsequently contacting the garment
with a treatment product containing a perfume
composition which is also a mixture of fragrance
materials, to sustain a presence of deposited
fragrance materials on the garment.

In significant forms of this invention, the
perfume composition used to treat the garment (or the
combination of fragrance materials deposited thereon)
is a deodorant perfume, so that use in accordance with
the invention will provide or sustain a deodorant

benefit on the garments.
Detailed description

The various aspects of this invention,
preferred forms and materials useful therein will now
be discussed in greater detail.

Textiles

The garments to which this invention relates
are made from fabric which includes spandex and other
fibres. As mentioned earlier, this term "spandex"
denotes a manufactured fibre in which the fibre


CA 02305529 2000-03-31

WO 99/19452 PCT/GB98/03053
forming substance is a long chain synthetic polymer
compound composed of at least 850 of a segmented
polyurethane.

Thus the polymer which is spun into spandex
5 fibres is a copolymer incorporating urethane linkages.
Generally the polymer contains so-called soft (i.e.
lower melting) segments which may be polyalkylene
ethers or polyesters and so-called hard (i.e. higher
melting) segments which are portions derived from the

reaction of an isocyanate and a chain extender which
is typically a diamine.

The soft segments may be
poly(tetramethylene)ethers, possibly containing
substituted tetramethylene glycol residues as

described in US-A-5000899. Organic diisocyanates which
may be used include conventional diisocyanates, such
as diphenylmethane-4,4'-diisocyanate, also known as
methylene-bis(4-phenylisocyanate) or "MDI", 2,4-

tolylene diisocyanate, methylene-bis(4-

cyclohexylisocyanate), isophorone diisocyanate,
tetramethylene-p-xylylene diisocyanate, and the like.
MDI is preferred.

Chain extenders used in producing the hard
segment of the fibres preferably include one or more
of ethylenediamine (EDA), 1,3-propylenediamine, 1,4-

cyclohexanediamine, hydrogenated m-phenylenediamine


CA 02305529 2000-03-31

WO 99/19452 PCT/GB98/03053
6
(HPMD), 2-methylpentamethylene diamine (MPMD) and 1,2-
propylene diamine. More preferably, the chain extender
is one or more of ethylenediamine, 1,3-
propylenediamine, and 1,4-cyclohexanediamine,

optionally mixed with HPMD, MPMD and/or 1,2-
propylenediamine.

Spandex fibres with
poly(tetramethylene)ethers as the soft segments are
marketed by DuPont de Nemours International S.A. under

the registered trade mark LYCRA of DuPont de Nemours
and Company.

Spandex fibres are generally mixed with
other fibres such as cotton, polyamide, wool,
polyester and acrylics and made into yarn which is

then made into fabric. The content of spandex fibres
is usually in a range from 0.5% by weight of the yarn
or fabric up to 50%, more usually from 1% to 30% by
weight of the yarn or fabric.

A wide range of garments may contain spandex
fibres in the fabric, including active sports wear,
intimate apparel, hosiery and a variety of ready to
wear casual clothing.

Fragrance materials

We have found that a range of fragrance
materials deposit well on, or are retained well on,


CA 02305529 2000-03-31

WO 99/19452 PCT/GB98/03053
7
spandex fibres. Such materials include the following

two categories:
Category A

hydroxylic materials which are alcohols, phenols
or salicylates, with an octanol/water partition
coefficient (P) whose common logarithm (1og10P) is
2.5 or greater, and a gas chromatographic Kovats
index (as determined on polydimethylsiloxane as
non-polar stationary phase) of at least 1050.

Category B

esters, ethers, nitriles, ketones or aldehydes,
with an octanol/water partition coefficient (P)
whose common logarithm (log10P) is 2.5 or greater,
and a gas chromatographic Kovats index (as

determined on polydimethylsiloxane as non-polar
stationary phase) of at least 1300.

The octanol-water partition coefficient (or its
common logarithm 'logP') is well known in the
literature as an indicator of hydrophobicity and water

solubility (see Hansch and Leo, Chemical Reviews, 71,
526 to 616, (1971); Hansch, Quinlan and Lawrence,
J.Organic Chemistry, 33, 347 to 350 (1968). Where such
values are not available in the literature they may be


CA 02305529 2000-03-31

WO 99/19452 PCT/GB98/03053
8
measured directly, or estimated approximately using
mathematical algorithms. Software providing such
estimations are available commercially, for example
'LogP' from Advanced Chemistry Design Inc.

A requirement for log10P of 2.5 or more calls for
materials which are somewhat hydrophobic.

Kovats indices are calculated from the retention
time in a gas chromatographic measurement referenced
to the retention time for alkanes [see Kovats,

Helv.Chim.Acta 41, 1915 (1958)]. Indices based on the
use of a non-polar stationary phase have been used in
the perfumery industry for some years as a descriptor
relating to the molecular size and boiling point of
ingredients. A review of Kovats indices in the perfume

industry is given by T Shibamoto in "Capillary Gas
Chromatography in Essential Oil Analysis", P Sandra
and C Bicchi (editors), Huethig (1987), pages 259-274.
A common non-polar phase which is suitable is 1000
dimethyl polysiloxane, as supplied for example under a

variety of tradenames such as HP-1 (Hewlett-Packard),
CP Sil 5 CB (Chrompack), OV-1 (Ohio Valley) and Rtx-1
(Restek).

Materials of low Kovats index tend to be volatile
and are not retained well on many fibres.

We have found that when perfumery materials have
partition coefficient as above and a relatively high


CA 02305529 2000-03-31

WO 99/19452 PCT/GB98/03053
9
value of Kovats index, deposition and retention on
spandex tends to be greater than on other fibres.
Preferably therefore, the perfume composition contains
at least 50 wt %, better at least 70 or 80 wt % of

materials from the categories above.

We have found that there is a particularly high
enhancement of deposition and retention on spandex,
compared to other fibres, with materials within the
above categories and having a Kovats index of not more

than 1600. These sub-sets of categories A and B may be
termed categories A' and B'. Preferably therefore, the
perfume composition contains at least 10 wt%, better
at least 20 wt % or 25 wt % of such materials. In some
preferred perfumes the amount of fragrance materials

from categories A' and B' is at least 40 wt % in
total.

Such fragrance materials are of mid-range
volatility (i.e. intermediate between the volatile
perfume materials used as "top-notes" and the

materials of low volatility which are customarily used
as base notes in perfumes). These materials of mid-
range volatility are often not perceptible on other
fabrics such as cotton, polyamide and polyester after
washing and drying.

Category A includes alcohols of general formula
ROH where the hydroxyl group may be primary, secondary


CA 02305529 2000-03-31

WO 99/19452 PCT/GB98/03053
or tertiary, and the R group is an alkyl or alkenyl
group, optionally branched or substituted, cyclic or
acyclic, such that ROH has partition coefficient and
Kovats properties as defined above. Alcohols of Kovats

5 index 1050 to 1600 are typically monofunctional alkyl
or arylalkyl alcohols with molecular weight falling
within the range 150 to 230.

Category A also includes phenols of general
formula ArOH, where the Ar group denotes a benzene
10 ring which may be substituted with one or more alkyl

or alkenyl groups, or with an ester grouping -CO2A,
where A is a hydrocarbon radical, in which case the
compound is a salicylate. ArOH has partition
coefficient and Kovats index as defined above.

Typically, such phenols with Kovats index 1050 to 1600
are monohydroxylic phenols with molecular weight
falling within the range 150 to 210.

A sub-set of fragrance materials which are
particularly preferred are those with a partition

coefficient of 1000 or more, i.e. log,oP of 3 or more,
and a Kovats parameter of 1100 up to 1600.

Some examples of hydroxylic ingredients which
fulfil the above criteria for category A' are listed
as a table below. Materials which are in the

particularly preferred sub-set are marked with an
asterisk. Semitrivial names are those used in standard


CA 02305529 2000-03-31

WO 99/19452 PCT/GB98/03053
11
texts known within the perfume industry, particularly:
Common Fragrance and Flavor Materials by Bauer, Garbe
and Surburg, VCH Publ., 2nd edition (1990), and

Perfume and Flavour Materials, Steffen Arctander,
published in two volumes by the author (1969).
Examples of fragrance materials in category A'
1-(2'-tert-butylcyclohexyloxy)-butan-2-ol*
3-methyl-5-(2',2',3'-trimethylcyclopent-3-enyl)-
pentan-2-ol*
4-methyl-3-decen-5-ol*
amyl salicylate*
2-ethyl-4(2',2',3-trimethylcyclopent-3'-enyl)but-2-enol*

(Bangalol, TM)
borneol*
carvacrol*
citronellol*
9-decenol*
dihydroeugenol*
dihydrolinalol*
dihydromyrcenol
dihydroterpineol *
eugenol
geraniol*
hydroxycitronellal*
isoamyl salicylate*
isobutyl salicylate*
isoeugenol*
linalol
menthol*
nerolidol*
nerol*
para tert-butyl cyclohexanol*


CA 02305529 2000-03-31

WO 99/19452 PCT/GB98/03053
12
phenoxanol*
terpineol
tetrahydrogeraniol*
tetrahydrolinalol
tetrahydromyrcenol
thymol*
2-methoxy-4-methylphenol (Ultravanil, TM)
(4-isopropylcyclohexyl)-methanol*
Some examples of fragrance materials which are in

category A but which have Kovats index above 1600 (so
as to fall outside category A') are:

patchouli alcohol
farnesol

benzyl salicylate

cyclohexyl salicylate and
hexyl salicylate

Category B is esters, ketones, aldehydes,
nitriles or ethers which have an octanol-water
partition coefficient whose common logarithm (log10P)

is at least 2.5, and a Kovats index of at least 1300
(non-polar phase).

Ingredients of Category B are of general formula
RX, where X may be in a primary, secondary or tertiary
position, and is one of the following groups: -COA, -
OA, -COZA, -CN or -CHO. The groups R and A are


CA 02305529 2000-03-31

WO 99/19452 PCT/GB98/03053
13
hydrocarbon residues, cyclic or non-cyclic and
optionally substituted. In some forms of this

invention, category B excludes any material with a
free hydroxy group, so that where a hydroxyl group is
present, the material should be considered only for

Category A membership. Typically, the materials of
Category B with Kovats index not exceeding 1600 (which
may be called category B') are monofunctional
compounds with molecular weights in the range 160 to
230.

A sub-set of particularly preferred fragrance
materials within category B' is those with a Kovats
parameter falling within the range 1350 up to 1600,
and possessing a molecular structure containing a

ring, such as phenyl or cycloalkyl.

A number of fragrance materials which fulfil the
above criteria for category B' are listed in the table
below. Materials which are in the particularly
preferred sub-set are marked with an asterisk.

Examples of fragrance materials in category B'
1-methyl-4-(4-methyl-3-pentenyl)-3-cyclohexene-i-
carbaldehyde*
1-(5',5'-dimethylcyclohexenyl)-pent-en-l-one*
2-heptyl cyclopentanone*
2-methyl-3-(4'-tert-butylphenyl)propanal
2-methylundecanal
2-undecenal


CA 02305529 2000-03-31

WO 99/19452 PCT/GB98/03053
14
2,2-dimethyl-3-(4'-ethylphenyl)-propanal
3-(4'-isopropylphenyl)-2-methylpropanal
4-methyl-4-phenylpent-2-yl acetate*
allyl cyclohexyl propionate*
allyl cyclohexyloxyacetate*
amyl benzoate*
methyl ethyl ketone trimers (Azarbre, TM)
benzophenone*
3-(4'-tert-butylphenyl)-propanal (Bourgeonal, TM)
caryophyllene*
cis-jasmone*
citral diethyl acetal
citronellal diethyl acetal
citronellyl acetate
phenylethyl butyl ether (Cressanther, TM)
damascone, alpha-*
damascone, beta-*
damascone, delta-*
decalactone, gamma-*
dihydro isojasmonate*
dihydrojasmone*
dihydroterpinyl acetate
dimethyl anthranilate*
diphenyl oxide*
diphenylmethane*
dodecanal
dodecen-2-al
dodecane nitrile
1-ethoxy-l-phenoxyethane (Efetaal, TM)
3-(1'-ethoxyethoxy)-3,7-dimethylocta-1,6-diene
(Elintaal Forte (TM)
4-(4'-methylpent-3'-enyl)-cyclohex-3-enal (Empetaal, TM)
ethyl tricyclo[5.2.1.0-2,6-]decane-2-carboxylate*
1-(7-isopropyl-5-methylbicyclo[2.2.2]oct-5-en-2-yl)-1-
ethanone* (Felvinone, TM)
allyl tricyclodecenyl ether* (Fleuroxene, TM)
tricyclodecenyl propanoate* (Florocyclene, TM)
gamma-undecalactone*


CA 02305529 2000-03-31

WO 99/19452 PCT/GB98/03053
n-methyl-n-phenyl-2-methylbutanamide* (Gardamide, TM)
tricyclodecenyl isobutyrate* (Gardocyclene, TM)
geranyl acetate
hexyl benzoate*
5 ionone alpha*
ionone beta*
isobutyl cinnamate*
isobutyl quinoline*
isoeugenyl acetate*
10 2,2,7,7-tetramethyltricycloundecan=5-one*
(Isolongifolanone, TM)
tricyclodecenyl acetate* (Jasmacyclene, TM)
2-hexylcyclopentanone (Jasmatone, TM)
4-acetoxy-3-pentyltetrahydropyran* (Jasmopyrane, TM)
15 ethyl 2-hexylacetoacetate (Jessate, TM)
8-isopropyl-6-methylbicyclo[2.2.2]oct-5-ene-2-
carbaldehyde (Maceal, TM)
methyl 4-isopropyl-l-methylbicyclo[2.2.2]oct-5-ene-2-
carboxylate*
methyl cinnamate
alpha iso methyl ionone*
methyl naphthyl ketone*
nerolin
nonalactone gamma
nopyl acetate*
para tert-butyl cyclohexyl acetate
4-isopropyl-l-methyl-2-[1'-propenyl]-benzene*
(Pelargene,TM)
phenoxyethyl isobutyrate*
phenylethyl isoamyl ether*
phenylethyl isobutyrate*
tricyclodecenyl pivalate* (Pivacyclene, TM)
phenylethyl pivalate* (Pivarose, TM)
phenylacetaldehyde hexylene glycol acetal*
2,4-dimethyl-4-phenyltetrahydrofuran (Rhubafuran, TM)
rose acetone*
terpinyl acetate


CA 02305529 2000-03-31

WO 99/19452 PCT/GB98/03053
16
4-isopropyl-l-methyl-2-[1'-propenyl)-benzene
(Verdoracine, TM)
yara*
(4-isopropylcyclohexadienyl)ethyl formate

Examples of fragrance materials which lie within
category B, but have Kovats index above 1600 and so
are outside category B' are listed in the following
table:

IWithin category B but outside category B'
amyl cinnamate
amyl cinnamic aldehyde
amyl cinnamic aldehyde dimethyl acetal
cinnamyl cinnamate
cyclamen aldehyde
1,2,3,5,6,7,8,8a-octahydro-1,2,8,8-tetramethyl-2-acetyl
naphthalene
(iso E super, TM)
cyclo-1,13-ethylenedioxytridecan-1,13-dione
(ethylene brassylate)
cyclopentadecanolide (Exaltolide, TM)
1,3,4,6,7,8-hexahydro-4,6,6,7,8,8-hexamethylcyclopenta[gJ-
2-benzopyran (Galaxolide, TM)
geranyl phenyl acetate
hexyl cinnamic aldehyde
6-acetyl-l-isopropyl-2,3,3,5-tetramethylindane
(Traseolide, TM)
1,1,2,4,4,7-hexamethyl-6-acetyl-1,2,3,4-
tetrahydronaphthalene (Tonalid, TM)

As indicated above, it is particularly preferred
to utilise a perfume composition which has deodorant


CA 02305529 2000-03-31

WO 99/19452 PCT/GB98/03053
17
properties. Preferably, the perfume is a deodorant
perfume giving a Malodour Reduction Value on cotton of
at least 0.25, preferably at least o.5, in the

Malodour Reduction Value test described below and
which is generally as given in EP-A-147191 and
corresponding US-A-4663068.

With such perfumes we have observed that there is
an enhanced deodorant benefit when the fabrics
incorporate spandex fibres, compared to conventional

fabrics such as cotton, polyamide and polyester
without spandex. This can be measured using the
Malodour Reduction Value test, modified by varying the
test fabric instead of varying the perfume.

The Malodour Reduction Value Test

In this test, the Malodour Reduction Value of a
deodorant perfume is measured by assessing its
effectiveness, when applied to fabric, in reducing
body malodour when the fabric so treated is placed in
contact with the axillae (armpits) of a panel of human

subjects, and held there for a standard period of
time. From subsequent olfactory evaluation by trained
assessors, a Malodour Reduction Value can be
calculated so giving a measure of the effectiveness as
a deodorant of the perfume under test.

Stage 1 is preparation of the perfume treated


CA 02305529 2000-03-31

WO 99/19452 PCT/GB98/03053
18
f abric.

A fabric is selected for the test and cut into 20
cm x 20 cm squares. A control fabric is likewise cut
into squares. Both fabrics are then washed in a front-

loading drum-type washing machine with a standard
unperfumed washing powder containing the following
ingredients:

Ingredient Parts by weight
Sodium dodecylbenzene sulphonate 9.0
C13_15 alcohol 7E0 4.0
Sodium tripolyphosphate 33.0
Alkaline sodium silicate 6.0
Sodium carboxymethyl cellulose 1.0
Magnesium silicate 1.0
Ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid 0.2
Sodium sulphate 15.0
Water 10.8
The washed pieces of fabric are then rinsed with

cold water and finally dried. The fabric squares so
obtained represent "untreated" fabric, that is fabric
devoid of perfume, other deodorant materials, dressing
and other water-soluble substances that subsequently
might adversely affect the Malodour Reduction Value
Test.

The untreated pieces of fabric are divided into
two batches, one of which may receive no further


CA 02305529 2000-03-31

WO 99/19452 PCT/GB98/03053
19
washing treatment and then represents the control

fabric in the test. The other batch of fabric pieces
is re-washed in the washing machine with the same
standard fabric washing powder to which has been added

0.2a by weight of the perfume under test. The perfume
treated pieces of fabric are then rinsed with cold
water and dried again. The fabric squares so obtained
represent "test" fabric, that is fabric onto which the
test perfume has been delivered.

When this test is used to assess the deodorant
effectiveness of a perfume composition, the control
and test fabrics are the same, suitably 100% cotton
shirt fabric and the "untreated" fabric serves as
control without further washing. However, the test can

be used to assess other effects, notably to test
deposition on different cloths, the test fabric can
differ from the control fabric, and both may be washed
in the same way with the perfumed washing powder.

Stage 2 is the carrying out of the test. A team
of three Caucasian female assessors of age within the
range of 20 years to 40 years is selected for
olfactory evaluation on the basis that each is able to
rank correctly the odour levels of the series of
standard aqueous solutions of isovaleric acid listed

below, and each is able to assign a numerical score,
corresponding to the odour intensity of one of these


CA 02305529 2000-03-31

WO 99/19452 PCT/GB98/03053
solutions, to the body malodour of a shirt insert

after has been worn in the axillary region by a male
subject for a standard period of time.

A panel of 40 human subjects for use in the test
5 is assembled from Caucasian male subjects of age
within the range of from 20 to 55 years. By screening,
subjects are chosen who develop axillary body malodour
that is not unusually strong and who do not develop a
stronger body malodour in one axilla compared with the

10 other. Subjects who develop unusually strong body
malodour, for example due to a diet including curry or
garlic, are not selected for the panel.

For two weeks before the start of the test, the
panel subjects are assigned an unperfumed, non-

15 deodorant soap bar for exclusive use when washing and
are denied the use of any other type of deodorant or
antiperspirant. At the end of this period, the 40
subjects are randomly divided into two groups of 20.

The "test" and "control" fabric pieces are then
20 tacked into 40 clean cotton or polyester cotton shirts
in the underarm region in such a manner that in 20
shirts, the control fabric pieces are attached inside
the left underarm region, and the test fabric pieces
are attached in the right underarm region. For the

remaining 20 shirts, the placing of control and test


CA 02305529 2000-03-31

WO 99/19452 PCT/GB98/03053
21
pieces of fabric is reversed.

The shirts carrying the tacked-in fabric inserts
are then worn by the 40 panel members for a period of
hours, during which time each panellist performs his
5 normal work function without unnecessary exercise.

After this five hour period, the shirts are
removed and the inserts detached and placed in
polyethylene pouches prior to assessment by the
trained panel of assessors.

The malodour intensity of each fabric insert is
evaluated by all three assessors who, operating
without knowledge of which inserts are "test" and
which are "control" and, without knowing the scores
assigned by their fellow assessors, sniff each fabric

piece and assign to it a score corresponding to the
strength of the odour on a scale from 0 to 5, with 0
representing no odour and 5 representing very strong
odour.

Standard aqueous solutions of isovaleric acid

which correspond to each of the scores 1, 2, 3, 4 and
5 are provided for reference to assist the assessors
in the malodour evaluation. These are shown below:
Score Odour level Concentration of aqueous
isovaleric acid (ml/l)
0 No odour 0


CA 02305529 2000-03-31

WO 99/19452 PCT/GB98/03053
22
1 Slight 0.013
2 Definite 0.053
3 Moderate 0.22
4 Strong 0.87
5 Very strong 3.57

The scores recorded by each assessor for each
fabric piece are averaged. The average score of the
"test" fabric pieces is deducted from the average

score of the "untreated" control fabric pieces to give
a Malodour Reduction Value.

As a check that the selection of panel subjects
is satisfactory for operation of the test, the average
score with untreated fabric pieces should be between
2.5 and 3Ø

Preferred deodorant perfumes are those which have
a Malodour Reduction Value of at least 0.50, or 0.70,
or 1.00. The higher the minimum value, the more
effective is the perfume as a deodorant as recorded by

the assessors in the Malodour Reduction Value Test. It
has also been noted that consumers, who are not
trained assessors, can detect by self-assessment a
noticeable reduction in malodour on soiled fabric such
as shirts and underclothes where the Malodour

Reduction Value is at least 0.30, so the higher the
Malodour Reduction Value above this figure, the more
noticeable is the deodorant effect.


CA 02305529 2000-03-31

WO 99/19452 PCT/GB98/03053
23
Selection of a combination of fragrance materials

to give a deodorant effect is explained in patents
such as US-A-430679 referred to earlier. Further
systems of selection are given in US-A-5482635 and US-

A-5554588 also mentioned above.

Such selections can be carried out using
materials with preferred values of partition
coefficient and Kovats index as discussed above.

US-A-5501805 describes perfume compositions made
from a combination of fragrance materials, where the
composition is a deodorant perfume yet has a
relatively low odour. Such "low-odour" deodorant
perfumes may be used in the present invention.

Fabric treatment products

A fabric treatment product, used as a vehicle to
deposit perfume on garments after they have been worn
may be any of:

a detergent composition for fabric washing,

a pretreatment composition for application to
selected areas of a garment prior to washing,

a pretreatment composition used in the soaking of


CA 02305529 2000-03-31

WO 99/19452 PCT/GB98/03053
24
entire garments prior to washing,

a rinse conditioner for softening washed fabrics
during a rinsing step,

an additive composition for use jointly with any
of the above,

a fabric conditioning article intended to be
placed with fabrics during drying, or a spray for
application directly to dry garments.

Such products can take a variety of forms

including powders, bars, sticks, tablets, mousses,
gels, liquids, sprays, and also fabric conditioning
sheets to be placed with fabrics in a tumble dryer.
The amount of perfume in such products may lie in a
range from 0.1% to 10% by weight of thereof. The

incorporation of perfume into products of these types
is known, and existing techniques may be used for
incorporating perfume for this invention. It may be
possible to incorporate perfume directly, but another
possibility is to absorb the perfume on a carrier

material and then admix the perfume carrier mixture
into the fabric treatment product. This approach may
notably be used with a solid fabric treatment product


CA 02305529 2000-03-31

WO 99/19452 PCT/GB98/03053
and on inert particulate carrier.

Fabric or laundry treatment products also
comprise perfume carrier products intended to be
placed near or between garments, such as in linen

5 cupboards and drawers, to deposit the perfume on the
garments by diffusion through the air or by direct
contact with the garments. Such perfume carrier
products may comprise up to 40% by weight of perfume.
They preferably comprise a solid carrier material,

10 e.g. in the form of a powder, beads or a sheet or
block of a porous material, which is (are) impregnated
or loaded with the perfume composition.

A detergent composition to be perfumed with a
perfume composition according to this invention will
15 normally contain a detersive surfactant in an amount

from 2% to 50%, preferably 5% to 40% by weight of the
composition, and a detergency builder in an amount
from 5% to 80% by weight of the composition. The
balance of the composition, if any, may include

20 various ingredients known for inclusion in fabric
washing detergents, including bleaching materials.
Surfactants may be one or more soap or non-soap
anionic, nonionic, cationic, amphoteric or
zwitterionic surfactants, or combinations of these.

25 Preferred surfactants which can be used are soaps and
synthetic non-soap anionic and nonionic compounds.


CA 02305529 2000-03-31

WO 99/19452 PCT/GB98/03053
26
Mixtures of surfactants, for example mixed anionic or
mixed anionic and nonionic compounds, are frequently
used in detergent compositions.

Detergency builders are materials which function
to soften hard water by solubilisation or other
removal of calcium and to a lesser extent magnesium
salts responsible for water hardness. The commonest
water soluble inorganic builder is sodium
tripolyphosphate. A further water soluble inorganic

builder compound is sodium carbonate which is
generally used in conjunction with a seed crystal to
accelerate the precipitation of calcium carbonate.
Common insoluble inorganic detergency builders are
zeolites and layered silicates. Organic detergency-

builders such as sodium citrate and polyacrylate can
also be used.

Some detergent compositions, usually liquids, are
formulated to contain from 5 wt % to 50 wt %
surfactant but little or no detergency builder.

Other ingredients which are customarily included
in a detergent composition, although not necessarily
all together, include alkaline silicate, peroxygen or
chlorine bleaches, soil release agents, heavy metal
sequestrants, anti-redeposition agents such as sodium

carboxymethyl cellulose, enzymes, enzyme stabilisers,
fabric softening agents including softening clays,


CA 02305529 2000-03-31

WO 99/19452 PCT/GB98/03053
27
fluorescent brighteners, antifoam agents or conversely
foam boosters and filler such as sodium sulphate.

Pretreatment compositions for soaking of soiled
fabrics prior to the main washing step may contain 5
wt % to 80 wt o by weight detergency builder with

little or no surfactant. Such compositions frequently
include enzymes.

The amount of perfume in a detergent composition
or a presoak composition is likely to lie in a range
from 0.1% to 2% by weight of the composition.

A fabric conditioning composition may contain
from 1% to 4011 by weight of a fabric conditioning
agent which may be a fabric softening agent, but may
contain higher levels in a very concentrated product.

Fabric softening agents are frequently nonionic or
cationic organic compounds incorporating at least one
alkyl, alkenyl or acyl group of 8 or more carbon
atoms. These include, but are not limited to:

(i) quaternary ammonium and imidazolinium

compounds and corresponding tertiary amines
and imidazolines incorporating at least one,
preferably two, C8 to C30 aklyl or alkenyl
groups; also including alkyl groups
containing, ether, ester, carbonate or amide

linkages, ethoxylated derivatives and


CA 02305529 2000-03-31

WO 99/19452 PCT/GB98/03053
28
analogues of such compounds and also
including compounds with more than one
tertiary or quaternary nitrogen atom,

(ii) aliphatic alcohols, esters, amines or

carboxylic acids incorporating a C8 to C30
alkyl, alkenyl or acyl group, including
esters of sorbitan and of polyhydric
alcohols,

(iii) silicones, mineral oils and polyols such as
polyethylene glycol.

A number of fabric conditioning compounds
are set out in US-A-4137180, and EP-A-239910.
Fabric conditioning compositions for

addition to a rinse liquid are frequently in the form
of aqueous dispersions of the conditioning agent. They
can also be made in the form of powders.

The amount of perfume in such conditioning
liquids and powders is usually 0.1% to 2% by weight.
Preferred levels can vary depending on the

concentration of softening agent and requirements of
the market.

The amount of perfume in very concentrated
fabric conditioners may lie in the broader range 0.1%


CA 02305529 2000-03-31

WO 99/19452 PCT/GB98/03053
29
to.10% by weight, preferably 2% to 8% by weight.

A fabric conditioning sheet is intended to
be placed with damp, rinsed, laundry in a tumble
dryer. Such a product contains a fabric conditioner,

which may be a nonionic compound as mentioned above,
soap and/or fatty acide, and which melts at
temperatures encountered in a tumble dryer. This is
carried on a porous sheet. Silicone oil may be
included. The amount of perfume incorporated in such

a product is usually from 2% to 10% of the product and
frequently from 2% or 4% to 7% or 8% by weight of the
product.

Another form of product for the treatment of
fabrics is a carrier liquid containing perfume and

packaged in an applicator which delivers the
composition as a spray. Such a spray may be marketed
as a "refreshing spray" for garments. In such a
product, the content of perfume will generally lie in
a range from 0.1% to 10% by weight of the liquid

composition.

This invention may be utilised to sustain a
presence of perfume on garments whose fabric was
treated with perfume during the manufacturing process,
before the fabric is first worn. Such pretreatment

with perfume may be carried out as treatment of yarn
which is later made into fabric, or in the "finishing"


CA 02305529 2000-03-31

WO 99/19452 PCT/GB98/03053
of new fabric in the form of a web or lengths from a

web which have not yet been made into garments, or
possibly garments which have been made but not yet
been worn. That perfume have been a preferentially-

5 deposited composition of the invention.

Finishing is a step in the processing of
fabrics to improve hand or surface appearance of
fabric. The fabric will typically be treated with an
aqueous treatment liquor containing fabric softener or

10 other material to deposit at a level of up to 3% by
weight of the fabric. Perfume may be included in the
liquor to deposit at a level of 0.001o to 1% by weight
of the fabric.

Preferably the treatment with a perfume

15 composition is carried out while treating with other
material in a conventional process step, especially a
wet stage in which the yarn or fabric is treated with
a finishing agent to improve its hand or appearance.

The materials which may be applied to fabric
20 in a conventional finishing treatment include resins
to confer stiffness, fabric stability or permanent
press, fabric softeners, flame retardants, fabric
brighteners, anti-snag agents, materials to confer
soil or stain resistance and water repellants.

25 Techniques which are conventionally used to
apply such materials are padding and exhaustion, both


CA 02305529 2000-03-31

WO 99/19452 PCT/GB98/03053
31
well known in the technology of textile manufacture.
Example 1

This experiment demonstrates perfume
deposition on spandex fibres. A mixture of perfume
ingredients was prepared and added to an unperfumed,

but otherwise conventional, laundry detergent powder,
to provide a perfume concentration of 0.5% by weight.
The perfumed powder was used to wash test

cloths which had not previously been treated with any
perfume. These were either all cotton, or 9501 cotton
with 5% spandex. After washing, the cloths were rinsed
and then line dried overnight.

The perfume was extracted from the dry
cloths with organic solvent, and the content of the
perfume ingredients in the solvent extracts was

determined by gas chromatography. if the concentration
of an ingredient extracted from the spandex containing
cloth was greater than from the all-cotton cloth by a
factor of 5 to 20, the result was coded as a medium

enhancement(M). If the concentration was greater by 20
or more, it was coded high(H) and if less than 5 or
not measurable, it was coded(L). The results obtained
were as follows:


CA 02305529 2000-03-31

WO 99/19452 PCT/GB98/03053
32
Ingredient K* logP* Enhancement Category
*
Boisambrene Forte 1714 5.5 M B
benzyl acetone 1206 2.0 M -
citronellol 1209 3.6 H A'
2,6-dimethyl-heptan-
2-ol 975 2.9 L -
jasmacyclene 1394 2.9 H B'
methyl salicylate 1167 2.3 L -
2-phenylethanol 1087 1.4 L -
terpinyl acetate 1331 4.0 H B'
tetrahydrogeraniol 1180 3.6 H A'
tetrahydrolinalol 1083 3.5 H A'
Tonalid 1840 6.4 M B
yara 1416 3.2 H B'
* Measured on OV-1 polydimethylsiloxane (Ohio

Valley) as stationary phase using capillary gc
** Measured or estimated using 'logP' software from
ACD Inc.

Example 2

Two perfume compositions contained perfume

ingredients in the specified categories, as follows:
Perfume Category A Category B
within within A within within B
A' but not A' B' but not B'
A 35.1% 4.5% 46.6% 5.0%
B 41.8% 0 43.8% 7.5%
C 27.6% 4 .0% 29.0% 21.2%


CA 02305529 2000-03-31

WO 99/19452 PCT/GB9S/03053
33

These were used in the procedure of the Malodour
Reduction Value test, as above, using test cloths which
were 95% cotton 5% spandex. For the control, unperfumed
washing powder was used to wash all-cotton test cloths.
The following results were obtained:

Perfume A Perfume B Perfume C
Average panel 1.04 1.29 1.57
score:
Control panel 2.46 2.46 2.46
score:
Malodour Reduction 1.42 1.17 0.89
Value
Malodour Reduction 57.7% 47.4% 36.1%
Value as % of
control score

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 2305529 was not found.

Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date 2008-07-29
(86) PCT Filing Date 1998-10-09
(87) PCT Publication Date 1999-04-22
(85) National Entry 2000-03-31
Examination Requested 2003-08-14
(45) Issued 2008-07-29
Deemed Expired 2018-10-09

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Application Fee $300.00 2000-03-31
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 2 2000-10-10 $100.00 2000-03-31
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 2000-09-18
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 3 2001-10-09 $100.00 2001-09-17
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 4 2002-10-09 $100.00 2002-09-24
Request for Examination $400.00 2003-08-14
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 5 2003-10-09 $150.00 2003-09-24
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 6 2004-10-11 $200.00 2004-09-22
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 7 2005-10-10 $200.00 2005-09-28
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 8 2006-10-10 $200.00 2006-09-27
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 9 2007-10-09 $200.00 2007-09-25
Final Fee $300.00 2008-04-30
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 10 2008-10-09 $250.00 2008-09-17
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 11 2009-10-09 $250.00 2009-09-18
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 12 2010-10-11 $250.00 2010-09-17
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 13 2011-10-10 $250.00 2011-09-19
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 14 2012-10-09 $250.00 2012-09-17
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 15 2013-10-09 $450.00 2013-09-17
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 16 2014-10-09 $450.00 2014-10-06
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 17 2015-10-09 $450.00 2015-09-29
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 18 2016-10-11 $450.00 2016-09-26
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
UNILEVER PLC
Past Owners on Record
CLEMENTS, CHRISTOPHER FRANCIS
LAROCHE, CHARLES
MACMASTER, ANGUS PETER
PERRING, KEITH DOUGLAS
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Claims 2007-06-28 2 56
Description 2000-03-31 33 1,147
Claims 2000-03-31 3 86
Abstract 2000-03-31 1 55
Cover Page 2000-06-08 1 40
Claims 2006-07-20 3 79
Cover Page 2008-07-14 1 33
Prosecution-Amendment 2007-06-28 4 92
Prosecution-Amendment 2007-01-10 1 38
Correspondence 2000-05-25 1 2
Assignment 2000-03-31 3 109
PCT 2000-03-31 13 412
Assignment 2000-09-18 4 120
Prosecution-Amendment 2003-08-14 1 32
Prosecution-Amendment 2006-01-23 2 62
Prosecution-Amendment 2006-07-20 8 254
Correspondence 2008-04-30 1 28