Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
CA 02321061 2000-08-14
WO 99/46769 PCT/EP99/01522
METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR DETECTING
AND CORRECTING MAGNIFICATION ERROR IN A
MULTI-BEAM OPTICAL DISK DRIVE
field of The 7~,nvention
5 The present invention relates to optical disk
drives that use multiple beams to simultaneously read
or write multiple tracks of an optical disk. More
specifically, the present invention provides a multi-
beam optical system that detects and corrects for
10 magnification errors and variations in track pitch
while simultaneously reading or writing multiple tracks
of an optical disk.
Background Of The Invention
Due to their high storage density, long data
15 retention life, and relatively low cost, optical disks
are becoming increasingly popular as a means to
distribute information. Large format disks have been
developed for storing full length motion pictures. The
compact disk (CD) format was developed and marketed for
20 the distribution of musical recordings and has replaced
vinyl records. High-capacity, read-only data storage
media, such as CD-RGM and Digital Versatile Disk (DYD),
have become prevalent in the personal computer field,
CA 02321061 2000-08-14
WO 99/46769 PCT/EP99/01522
- 2 -
and the DVD format may soon replace videotape as the
distribution medium of choice for video information.
Recently, relatively inexpensive optical disk
writers and writable optical media have become
5 available, making optical disks popular as backup and
archival storage devices for personal computers. The
large storage capacity of writable optical disks also
makes them ideal for use in multimedia authoring and in
other applications which require access to large
10 amounts of storage. Current writable optical disk
technologies include several write-once technologies,
such as CD-Recordable (CD-R). A few technologies
permit writing, erasing, and rewriting data on a disk,
such as Mini-Disk (MD), which uses magneto-optical
15 technology. Other veritable formats employ phase-change
and dye-polymer technology. Recent advances in
veritable optical disk technology have made rewritable
optical media more practical, and the specification for
DVD-RAM calls for use of high-capacity rewritable
20 optical media.
An optical disk is made of a transparent disk
or substrate in which data, in the form of a serial
bit-stream, is encoded as a series of pits in a
reflective surface within the disk. The pits are
25 arranged along a spiral or circular track. Data is
read from the optical disk by focusing a low power
laser bean onto a track on the disk and detecting the
light reflected from the surface of the disk. Hy
rotating the optical disk, the light reflected from the
30 surface of the disk is modulated by the pattern of the
pits rota~ing into and out of the laser's field of
illuminat:.on. Optical and imaging systems detect the
modulated, reflected, laser light and produce an
CA 02321061 2000-08-14
WO 99/46769 PCT/EP99/01522
g
electrical signal which may be decoded to recover the
digital data stored on the optical disk.
Data is typically recorded on writable
optical disks by using a higher power laser than is
5 used for z~eading. The media for use with optical disk
writers typically includes a recording layer, made of a
material that changes its optical characteristics in
response to the presence of the beam from the high
power laser. The high power laser is used to create
10 "pits" in the recording layer which have a different
reflectivity than surrounding areas of the disk, and
which can be read using a lower power reading beam. In
systems having the ability to erase and re-record data,
a laser having a power output between the low power
15 used for reading and the high power used for writing
may be used to erase data. Alternatively, some systems
employ a laser Which outputs a different wavelength of
light to erase data from the optical media. The
methods used to write and erase optical disks depend on
20 the type of recordable media being used.
Tv be able to write or retrieve data from an
optical disk, the optical systems include an optical
head which may be positioned to read or write data an
any disk track. Processor-driven servo mechanisms are
25 provided for focusing the optical system and for
keeping the optical head positioned over the track,
despite disk warpage or eccentricity.
Because in most previously known systems the
data is read or written serially, i.e. one bit at a
30 time, the maximum data transfer rate for an optical
disk reader or writer is typically determined by the
rate at which the pits on the disk (or the correct
positions for pits to be written) pass by the optical
CA 02321061 2000-08-14
WO 99/46769 PCT/EP99/01522
- 4 -
head. The linear density of the bits and the track
' pitch (distance between tracks) are fixed by the
specification vt the particular optical disk format.
For example, CD disks employ a track pitch of 1.5 tun
(t0.1 um), while DVD employs a track pitch only about
one-half as wide.
Previously known methods of increasing the
data transfer rate of optical disk readers and writers
have focused vn increasing the rate at which the pits
pass by the optical head by increasing the rotational
speed of the disk itself. Currently, drives with
rotational speeds of up to 16x standard speed are
commercially available, and even faster reading speeds
have been achieved by moving to constant angular
velacity designs. Higher disk rotational speeds,
however, place increased demands on the optical and
mechanical subsystems within the optical disk player,
create greater vibration, and may make such players
more difficult and expensive to design and manufacture.
Higher rotation speeds also make accurately writing
data to a disk more difficult, so few CD-R systems are
available that record at faster than 4x standard speed.
A cost effective alternative to increasing
the disk rotational speed to provide faster optical
disk drives is to read or write multiple data tracks
simultaneously. If, for example, seven tracks could be
read or written simultaneously, an optical disk drive
which. rotates the disk at 8x standard speed would
provide perfvrmance~equivalent tv a 56x optical disk
drive.
Similar techniques have been employed to
provide high-speed optical disk readers. Numerous
methods for generating multiple beams to read several
CA 02321061 2000-08-14
WO 99/46769 PCT/EP99/0152Z
- 5 -
tracks simultaneously have been used. U.S. Patent No.
4,459,690, to Corsover, for example uses acousto-
optical techniques to split a beam into multiple beams
for use in reading an optical disk. Other systems have
used a diffraction grating to generate multiple beams
used to simultaneously illuminate multiple tracks. The
system described in commonly assigned U.S. Patent No:
5, 426, 623, to A7.on et al., uses a wide area
illumination beam, which illuminates multiple tracks at
once to simultaneously read multiple tracks of an
optical disk.
It should be noted that as used herein, a
data track is a portion of the spiral data track of a
typical optical disk, and follows the spiral for one
rotation of the disk. Thus, a drive capable of reading
multiple data tracks simultaneously will read multiple
portions of the spiral data track at once. For optical
disks having concentric circular tracks, a data track
would refer to one such circular track. For disks
having multiple concentric spiral tracks, such as those
described in coiamonly assigned. copending U.S. patent
application Serial No. 08/885,425, filed June 30, 1997,
a data track would refer to one of the concentric
spiral tracks.
Designing an optical disk drive that
simultaneously writes multiple tracks of an optical
disk presents slightly different challenges than
designing a system which only reads multiple tracks
simultaneously. First, each of the beams used to write
to the disk must be able to be separately modulated, to
record different data on each of the tracks.
Consequently, designs like those described above, that
split a single beam or employ a wide area beam, will
CA 02321061 2000-08-14
WO 99/46769 PCT/EP99/01522
6
not generally work for a drive that can bath read and
write. Instead, mufti-beam optical disk drives which
can write multiple tracks simultaneously use multiple
laser diodes, which can be individually modulated, to
generate the beams used for writing. Such an array of
laser diodes is described. for example, in U.S. Patent
No. 5,144, 63.6 to Yasukawa et al.
Additionally, since most optical disk formats
arrange their data along a single long spiral, there
may be difficulties with data alignment and timing when
writing multiple tracks simultaneously. Insuring
alignment of the data being written by multiple beams
on different parts of the same spiral may be very
difficult. These problems are overcome in some
writable formats by using a pre-formatted disk, on
which. the tracks are already laid out, and the disk
already contains clocking and timecode information
before data is written to the disk. CD-Recordable (CD-
R), which is currently the most popular writable
optical disk format uses such a scheme, as do DVD-R and
DVD-RAM, which will probably replace CD-R over the next
few years. Other formats may include header
information that describes the track pitch.
Although using a format such as CD-R, DVD-R,
or DVD-RAM, in which the tracks are pre-formatted,
solves the most difficult data alignment and timing
problems faced by a mufti-beam optical disk drive, it
creates a new problem with keeping the beams aligned
with the tracks while writing. Specifically, since the
tracks are pre-arranged on the disk, it is necessary to
insure that each of the multiple beams aligns with one
of the tracks during writing. This same alignment of
"A 02321061 2000-08-14
07-03-2000 ~ ~ ' ~~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :- EP 009901522 ..~
vosslus & Pa~,~NE~
PCT/EP99/01522 ~ . ~~ .... .. .
ZEN RESEARCH N . V . :'. ~ ~~ ~~ ~al~ Z~ : h: ~~~ENTllN4~g~T~
Our Ref . : D 1280 PCT ~ ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ~PB~~TST.R~4
' ' the beams with the tracks also must be maintained while
reading from the disk.
Manufacturing tolerances may lead to minor
differences in magnification of an optical head, leading
S to minor differences in the spacing of the beams between
systems: Additiorially, there is some variation in the
track pitch allowed in Lhe specifications for commonly
used optical disk formats, such as CD-ROM, CD-R, DvD,
DVD-R and DVD-RAM formats. A multi-beam optical disk
drive must be able to detect and correct for these
magnification errors and track pitch variations to insure
that the beams used to read from and write to the disk
are properly aligned with the cracks.
There have been prior attempts at aligning
multiple beams with multiple tracks in an optical device.
For example, publication DE-A-38 04 701 describes a
multi-beam apparatus in which a pair of sensors is used
to determine tracking errors associates with a
corresponding pair of beams. A Galvano mirror is tilted
2o to correct for the tracking error of the first beam and a
Dare p=ism is rotated to correct for the tracking error
of the second beam.
Document JP-A-06 096 467 shows moving a lens to
adjust the intervals between beams in an optical
recording and reproducing device. Document JP-A-02 158
931 discloses matching an array of laser spots to the
track pitch by rotating a platform on which a laser LED
is mounted. A sensor receiving the reflected beams
generates a combined error signal. The combined error
signal i9 used to optimize the inter-beam intervals.
United States Patent No. 4,768,184 discloses a
means and methods for using ar_ anamorphic prism beam
expander to minimize variation in spacing between beams
AMENDED SHEET
~'A 02321061 2000-08-14
07-03-2000 ~ ~ ' ~ ~ - '_ - _ . . ~ _ - _ ,. , . ~ . , , ~ ~ ~ . : ~ EP
009901522 _ .
. .. .... .. .... .. ..
.. .. . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . ..
. . . . . . ..
_~pr~. . ... .... ....
.. . .. .. .. ..
in a mufti-beam optical recording system. During
alignment, spacing between adjacent beams is measured,
using as oscilloscope coupled to a CCD, for example. The
beam expander may be adjusted to minimize variation in
the~measured spacing.
' Document WO-A-93/03481 describes a mufti-beam
recording and reproducing device in which an array of
multiple beams is orieated az an angle to the track
direction of a recording medium to reduce the effective
to track pitch. The reference suggests that it may be
possible. to monitor the angular variation and track pitch
and to adjust~the angle of the multiple beams; however,
no further elaboration is provided.
It would therefore be desirable to provide a
mufti-beam optical head, and methods of use, that enable
detection and correction of magnification and track-pitch
errors while simultaneously reading or writing multiple
tracks of data from or to an optical disk. The
capability to correct for such errors would provide
improved alignment of the beams with the tracks being
read or written on the disk, and make simultaneous
reading or writing of multiple tracks practicable_
It further would be desirable to provide a
mufti-beam optical head, and methods of use, that enable
detection of a track pitch of an optical disk, and that
employ the detected track pitch to correct magnification
errors and track-pitch while simultaneously reading or
writing multiple tracks of an optical disk.
AMENDED SHEET
CA 02321061 2000-08-14
WO 99/46769 PCT/EP99/01522
- 8
summary of The Invention
In view of the foregoing, it is an object of
the present invention to provide methods and apparatus
for detecting and correcting misalignments between the
5 beams of a multi-beam optical disk drive and the tracks
of an optical disk caused by magnification error and
track-pitch variation.
It is a further object of this invention to
provide methods and apparatus that enable detection of
a track pitch of an optical disk, and that employ the
detected track pitch to correct magnification errors
and track-pitch while simultaneously reading or writing
multiple tracks of an optical disk.
In accordance with the principles of the
15 present invention, this is accomplished by detecting a
magnification error, and then using that information to
vary the optical power or magnification of the optical
system. Accordingly, the reading or writing beams of
the system may be focused onto the disk to adjust the
20 spacing between the beams, so they are aligned with the
tracks on the optical disk. A number of methods and
apparatus employing the principles of the present
invention are provided.
A first embodiment of a magnification
25 correction system built ~:n accordance with the
principles of the present invention uses a movable lens
arrangement to adjust the magnification of the system.
An alternative embodiment uses one or more prisms to
build an anamorphic variable power optical system that
30 adjusts the spacing of the beams by rotating a prism.
Another alternative embodiment uses a lens with a
curvature that varies along its length to correct
magnification errors. In certain embodiments, the
CA 02321061 2000-08-14
WO 99/46769 PCT/EP99/01522
_ g _
optical head may be moved laterally with respect to the
tracks to compensate for the magnification and track
pitch variation effects.
Magnification errors may also be corrected by
S changing the effective distance between the laser
diodes and or the spacing between photodetectors used
to image the u~ultiple data tracks. This is done by
adjusting the position of the array of laser diodes and
or photodetector elements, relative to the radial
10 direction of the optical disk, so that the beams align
with the tracks o~ the optical disk.
Methods are also described for detecting
magnification and track pitch errors, so that those
errors may be taken into account when simultaneously
15 reading or writing several tracks of an optical disk.
In one embodi~uent, the track pitch is determined using
track pitch recorded on the disk; in other embodiments,
an initial calibration step may be employed whexein the
track pitch is computed by a track counting method or
20 by analyzing the fitter rate obtained in reading block
header (or other pre-recorded) data from the disk.
Any of the foregoing methods may be used to
provide continuous correction of magnification errors,
thereby enabling the beams of a multi-beam optical disk
25 drive to remain aligned with the tracks of an optical
disk.
Hrief Desc~a,Btion ~Jf The Drawings
The above and other objects of the invention,
its nature and various advantages, will be apparent
30 upon consideration of the following detailed
description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying
CA 02321061 2000-08-14
WO 99/46769 PCT/EP99/01522
- 10 -
drawings, in which like reference characters refer to
like parts throughout, and in which:
FZG. 1 is a simplified view of an optical
head for use in a multi-beam optical disk drive:
FIGS. 2A-2C illustrate alignment of the light
beams generated by the laser diodes with the tracks of
the optical disk when the system is in alignment, and
when there are over-magnification and under-
magnification errors, respectively;
FIG. 3 shows an optical sensor used for
detecting the degree of magnification error;
FIG. 4 shows an embodiment of a.variable
power optical system
FIG. 5 shows an alternative embodiment of a
variable power optical system:
FIGS. 5A-6B illustrate the use of prisms in
an anamvrphic variable power optical system;
FIG. 7 is an illustrative embodiment of a
cylindrical lens for use in an alternative embodiment
for correcting magnification errors:
FIGS. 8A-8B illustrate correction of
magnification errors by rotating the array of laser
diodes that generates the writing beams:
FIGS. 9A-9B illustrate correction of
magnification errors by rotating the array of
photodetector elements that receives the beams
reflected from the surface of the optical disk; and
FIG. l0 illustrates an alternative detector
suitable for use in the present invention.
CA 02321061 2000-08-14
WO 99/46769 PCT/EP99/O15Z2
- 11 -
Detailed Descrietion Of The Invention
Referring first to FIG. 1, a simplified
diagram of an optical head 10 for a mufti-beam optical
disk drive constructed in accordance with the present
5 invention is described. individual components of
optical head l0 may comprise elements used in
conventional CD-R yr DVD-RAM drives. In accordance
with the present invention, a plurality of laser diodes
12a--12e generate a plurality of light beams which may
10 be used to siiaultaneously read multiple tracks, or
individually modulated to write data on multiple
tracks, of optical disk 18. The beams are collimated
by collimator lens 14, and are focussed onto a surface
of optical disk 18 by objective 16.
15 Optical disk 18 contains a data layer (not
shown) in which the data is recorded, typically in the
form of "pits", having a,reflectivity different than
the surrounding areas of optical disk 18. Thia
difference in reflectivity is typically achieved by
20 using a data layer comprising a layer of a_n organic
polymer dye disposed in front of a thin reflective film
(typically gold). When the system is writing data to
the disk, the light beams heat the polymer dye to a
predetermined temperature, causing the opacity of the
25 dye to change, and altering the reflectivity of the
data layer. Alternatively, some r~cordable optical
disks use physical or chemical properties of the data
layer material, such as its magnetic properties, or its
ability to polarize incident light, to record the data.
30 With respect to the magnification correction
aspects of the present invention for simultaneously
writing multiple data tracks, optical disk 18 is
preferably pre-formatted, as are most commercially
CA 02321061 2000-08-14
WO 99/46769 PCT/EP99/41522
- 12 -
available recordable optical disk types. For a
preformatted optical disk 18, the block headers and
tracks are already laid out on optical disk 18 and
contain clocking and timecode information. To record
5 data in the tracks, the beams used for writing must be
aligned with the pre-formatted tracks. Alternatively,
if the disk is not pre-formatted, then it is sufficient
only to maintain the track pitch of the multiple tracks
being written within the specification of the
10 appropriate disk type. If the disk is being read, the
beams used for reading must be aligned with the tracks.
Referring again to FIG. 1, the beams, whether
reading or writing data, axe reflected off of the data
layer of optical disk 18, and are directed toward
15 optical sensor 22 by beam splitter 20, which may be a
half-silvered mirror. Lens 24 may be provided to
further focus the reflected 1-ght from the surface of
optical disk 18 on to optical sensor 22. Optical
sensor 22 may be used to detect the focus, tracking,
20 and magnification error of the beams which are used tv
write to optical disk 18. Additionally, optical sensor
22 may be used to read data from optical disk 18 when
the power of the beams is lo~aered to permit reading.
The description of the optical head of FIG. 1
25 is intended to be illustrative, not limiting. It is to
be understood that many varia~ions and embellishments
of the basic optical head are possible. For example.
beam splitter 20 may be a holographic element or half-
silvered mirror. Several. possible configurations of
30 optical heads usable for reading and writing optical
disks are discussed in Tie Compact Dia~andbook,
Pohlmann, K., 2d. ed., A-R Editions, 1992. The
principles of the present inve:.tion are not limited to
CA 02321061 2000-08-14
WO 99/46769 PCT/EP99/01522
- 13 -
an optical head as disclosed in FIG. 1, but are easily
adaptable to a wide variety of optical head designs, if
modified as described hereinafter.
FIGS. 2A-2C show the pre-formatted tracks on
5 optical disk 18, with the spots projected by the
plurality of beams. In FIG. 2A, spots 30a-30e,
projected by laser diodes 12a-12e, respectively, are
aligned with pre-formatted tracks 32a-32e,
respectively, so the tracks may be read or written
10 simultaneously. Due to manufacturing tolerances,
temperature changes, age, and other factors, the
magnification of the optical system which focuses the
beams onto the disk may vary slightly. Add.tionally,
there may be slight variation in the track pitch of the
15 pre-formatted tracks on recordable optical disks.
These :factors can cause the beam spacing not to
precisely correspond to the track spacing, but instead
lead to a misalignment of the beams with the tracks.
This misalignment is hereinafter referred to as
20 "magnification error."
In FiG. 2B. the spacing between spots 30a-30e
is greater than the spacing between tracks 32a-32e, so
the optical system provides too much magnification.
FIG. 28 shows the situation where too little
25 magnification is provided by the system, thereby
causing the spacing of spots 30a-30e to be less than
the spacing between tracks 32a-32e. Similar errors
could also result from variations in the track pitch of
optical disk 18. To permit simultaneous reading or
30 writing of multiple tracks, these magnification errors
must be corrected.
CA 02321061 2000-08-14
WO 99/46769 PCT/EP99/01522
- 14 -
Before magnification errors may be corrected,
however, they first must be detected. FIG. 3 shows a
detailed view of optical sensor 22 of FIG. 1. optical
sensor 22 includes photodetector elements 34-38, which
5 may be used for reading data from the tracks when the
beams are set t4 a power level appropriate for reading.
When data xs being written to optical disk iB, light
reflected from the pre-formatted tracks of optical disk
18 will be projected onto photodetector elements 34-38.
10 Photodetector elements 37 and 38,
illustratively the outermost elements of the array,
further comprise two segments 37a, 37b and 38a, 3Bb,
respectively, per element. A signal proportional to
the magnification error can be generated by subtracting
15 the sum of the signals from the innermost segments of
photodetectar elements 37 and 38 from the sum of the
signals from the outermost segments of photodetector
elements 37 and 38, in accordance with equation (1):
E~, ~(37b+38a)-(37a+38b) ( 1 )
In addition to reading data from multiple
20 tracks, and generating a signal indicative of
magnification error, the photodetectvr elements of
optical sensor 22 may also be used to generate tracking
and focus error signals. For example. photodetector
element 34 may optionally be configured as a quadrant
25 detector, for use in detecting focus errors using the
well-known astigmatism method, using equation (2):
E f (3Aa+34c1) - ( 34h+34c) (2 )
CA 02321061 2000-08-14
WO 99/46769 PCT/EP99/01522
- 15 -
Likewise, photodetector elements 37 and 38
may be employed to compute a tracking error. Tn this
case, the sum of the left-hand segments of
photodetector elements 37 and 38 is subtracted from the
5 sum of the right-hand segments of photodetector
elements 37 and 38, in accordance with equation (3):
E~=(37a+38a)-(37b+38b) (3)
Alternatively, a signal indicative of the tracking
error could be generated by subtracting the sum of the
signals from the left-hand quadrants (34a, 34c) of
10 photodetector 34 from the sum of the signals from the
right-hand quadrants (34b, 34d) of photodetector
element 34.
It will be evident to one skilled in the
relevant arts that the number and configuration of the
15 photo-detector elements shown in FIG. 3 must match the
number and configuration of the beams used in the
multi-beam sy'tem. It will further be evident that the
detectors shown with reference to FIG. 3 are
illustrative.' In particular, the magnification error
20 may be computed with any of the detector elements,
including the quadrants of photodetector element 34.
It is expected, however, that the
magnification error may be most easily and accurately
measured using the signals generated by the outermost
25 pair of elements, whexe the effect of the magnification
error i.s expected to be the largest. Moreover, either
or both o~ the focus error signal and tracking error
signal may be computed using alternative arrangements,
CA 02321061 2000-08-14
WO 99/46769 PCT/EP99/01522
_ 16
without departing from the principle of the present
invention.
Other methods may also be used to determine
the track pitch, and hence the degree of magnification
5 required to provide proper alignment of the multiple
beams witr. the tracks being read ar Written. For
example, some optical disks may include the track pitch
information in a header area of the optical disk. This
information is read when the optical disk is inserted
10 into the disk drive, and may be used to adjust the
degree of magnification provided by the optical system
as described hereinbelow.
In alternative methods, a calibration step
may be performed when the optical disk is first
15 inserted in the optical disk drive. The aptical disk
drive is programmed to provide a magnification of the
optical system that corresponds to a nominal track
pitch for a preselected optical disk type. During the
calibration step, the optical. disk is scanned and a
20 lookup table of magnification error is generated that
is correlated to track position using, for example,
track counting or fitter analysis methods.
The lookup table created during the
calibration step may be continuously or periodically
25 consulted when simultaneously reading or writing
multiple tracks to the optical disk to vary the degree
of magnification correction based on local track pitch.
The lookup table values are generated whenever a new
optical disk is inserted into the optical disk drive to
30 account for local variations in track pitch, and may be
periodically updated during the reading or writing
process.
CA 02321061 2000-08-14
WO 99/46769 PCT/EP99/O15Z2
- 17 -
In the track counting method, the lookup
table values are based on the actual track pitch
measured on the optical disk, for example, as a
function of radial location on the disk. In this
5 method, optical head 10 is located at a first position,
at which the block header (or previously written data)
is read. Optical head l0 is then moved to a second
position a known distance from the first position, and
the block header information for that track is read.
10 While the optical head is being moved between the first
and second positions, the number of tracks crossed are
counted. From this information, the actual track pitch
of the optical disk may be computed as the known
distance divided by the number of tracks skipped.
15 Alternatively, the track pitch may be
calculated by determining the number of data blocks
that fit into a known number of tracks. Since the
length of a data block along the spiral track is known,
the length of the spiral portion of the track between
20 the two blocks may be determined from the difference in
block numbers read from the block header data. This
difference may then be compared to the difference
computed for an optical disk having a nominal track
pitch, to estimate the actual track pitch of the disk.
25 The ratio of the actual track pitch to the
nominal track pitch yields the magnification error,
which may then be used to adjust the optical system, as
described hereinafter. Alternatively, the foregoing
process may be repeated along the radius of the disk,
30 thus generating a table of track pitch correlated tv
track position.
CA 02321061 2000-08-14
WO 99/46769 PCT/EP99/01522
- 18 -
In the fitter analysis method, a table of
. magnification corrections is generated, correlated to
disk location, that provides the lowest fitter rate,
i.e., the lowest error correction rate for the data
signals, when reading block header data, or previously
written tracks of the optical disk. In this method,
block header information or other data is read from
several tracks, and the degree of magnification
provided by the optical system is dithered. This in
turn effects the quality of the track signals for the
data being read, as reflected in the error rate, for
example, as determined by conventional ECC circuitry.
The degree of magn~.fication that produces the lowest
error rate is then selected for uae in reading data
from, or writing data to, the optical disk.
Once a magnification error has been detected
by any of the foregoing methods, various methods and
mechanisms may be employed tp correct or compensate for
the error. In a first embodiment of a magnification
error correction system, optical head 10 of FIG. I ~.s
provided with a capability to vary its optical power or
magnification. Such a magnification correction
mechanism, preferably disposed in the optical path
between laser diodes 12a-12e and optical disk 18, and
more preferably, in the optical path before collimating
lens 14, would enable correction of the spacing of the
beams before they are projected onto optical disk 18.
FIGS. 4 and 5 show two illustrative methods of
providing a variable power optical system.
In FIG. 4, lens 40 remains stationary while a
serve system (net shown) moves lens 42 ax~.ally to vary
the power of the optical system responsive to the
magnification error signal generated by optical sensor
CA 02321061 2000-08-14
WO 99/46769 PCT/EP99/01522
- 19 -
22. Moving lens 42 causes a shift in the image plane,
so lens 44 must be moved towards or away from lens 42
to counteract the image plane shift. In the system of
FIG. 4, the position of lens 44 is expected to be a
5 nonlinear function of the position of lens 42.
Referring now to FIG. 5, two alternative
'variable power optical systems are shown, comprising a
series of alternately fixed lenses 46 and movable
lenses 48. Movable lenses 48 are linked together, and
10 move axially as a unit to vary the power of the optical
system. Some shifting of the image plane occurs as the
power is varied, but over small ranges of power change,
the image plane shift is small. Additional lenses may
be added to reduce image plane shift.
15 Yet another embodiment of a magnification
error correction mechanism of the present invention is
shown in FIGS. 6A and 6B. As shown in FIG. 6A, prism
SO may be inserted into the optical path between laser
diodes 12a-12e and optical disk 18. Prism SO may be
20 used as an anamorphic lens, wherein the prism magnifies
the beams in a single dimension. This may be used, for
example, to reduce the width of the beam spacing from wl
to w2. Since the power of prism 50 is determined by the
angle of its faces with respect to the optical path,
25 its power may be varied by rotating prism 50 about a
line parallel to its axis, thereby compensating for the
magnification errors. This may be accomplished by
using a servo system (not shown) to rotate prism 50
responsive to the magnification error signal produced
30 by optical sensor 22.
However, prism 50 also causes an angular
deviation of the incident light that is a function of
the angle of the prism faces with respect to the light.
CA 02321061 2000-08-14
WO 99/46769 PCT/EP99/01522
- 20 -
As illustrated in FIG. 6B, a second prism may be used
to eliminate or reduce the angular deviation. Thus, by
suitably rotating prism 54 the angular deviation
introduced by prism 52 may be counteracted. Further
5 details and designs of variable power systems using
lenaes and/or prisms are described in Chapter 9 of
Modern Optical Fr,~;"eerina, Warren J. Smith, McGraw-
Hill Book Company, New York, 1966, which is
incorporated herein by reference.
14 It should be noted that the light exiting
prism 59 in the embodiment of FIG. 6H has a iateral
offset relative to the rays entering prism 52.
Relatively small offsets may be insignificant,
depending upon the size of the detector elements used
15 for imaging the multiple tracks. Larger offsets may
appear as tracking errors, and may be compensated for
using any of a number of well-known methods for
correcting tracking errors. For example, a larger
tracking error may be corrected by using optical sensor
20 22 to generate a tracking error Signal as described
hereinabove with respect to FIG. 3. Optical head 10
may then be moved by a servo system (not shown)
responsive to the tracking error signal to compensate
for the tracking error.
25 Referring to FIG. ?, a further exemplary
embodiment of a variable power optical system is
described. Cylindrical lens 56 has a radius of
curvature that varies along a length of the lens.
Cylindrical lens 56 is positioned in the optical path
30 such that its flat face is perpendicular to the optical
path and its axis is perpendicular to the line of the
laser diodes. Like the prisms of the embodiments of
FIGS. 6A and 6H, a cylindrical lens provides
CA 02321061 2000-08-14
WO 99/46769 PCT/EP99/01522
- 21 -
magnification in only a single dimension, wherein the
degree of magnification is determined by the radius of
the curved surface of the lens. By using a lens in
which the curvature varies along its length, the
horizontal magnification of the images may be
controlled through vertical movement of the variable
radius cylindrical lens. A servo system (not shown)
may be used to move the lens vertically in response to
the magnification error signal generated by optical
sensor 22.
The systems for correcting magnification
errors discussed hereinabove operate by changing the
magnification or optical power of optical head 10, of
FIG. 1. Alternatively, an optical disk reader may
compensate for the magnification error by effectively
changing the spacing of the laser diodes 12a-12e and,
optionally, the spacing, of the photodetector elements
34-38, of FIG_ 1. An embodiment of such a
magnification error compensation system is described
with respect to FIGS. 8A and 8B.
In the embodiment of FzGS. 8A and 8B, laser
diodes 12a-12e comprise a ro~atable substrate on which
the laser-emitting portions are mounted. The substrate
may be rotated, or pivoted, to a particular orientation
angle responsive to the magnification error signal.
The effective spacing of laser diodes 12a-12e is
dependent on the rotation angle A, and is given by:
dW dx axe) ( 4 )
where d is the inter-diode spacing, and d' is the
effective inter-diode spacing.
CA 02321061 2000-08-14
WO 99/46769 PC'T/EP99/01522
- 22
For example, in FIG. 8A, laser diodes 12a-12e
are oriented at a 45° angle relative to the direction
of track image motion, thus the effective inter-diode
spacing is equal to d~cos(45°), or about 71$ of d.
5 When the magnification error indicates too little
magnification, i.e. the spots projected onto optical
disk 18 by the beams generated by laser diodes 12a-12e
are too closely spaced, a servo system may rotate the
array of laser diodes so that they have a larger angle
10 relative to the tracks, as is shown in FIG. 8B. This
rotation effectively increases the inter-diode spacing
between laser diodes 12a-12e, as shown by d " . _
Ir the above-described magnification error
correction techniques are used to correct large errors
15 in the track pitch, it may in addition be necessary to
adjust the inter-element spacing of photodetectors 34-
38. Specifically, when the beam spacing is adjusted to
correct for large variations in track pitch, the beams
reflected from the disk may no longer be properly
20 aligned with the sensors. As shown in FTGS. 9A,
photodetectors 34-38 zaay be initially oriented at a 45°
angle relative to the direction of track image motion,
in alignment with the laser diodes 12a-12e of FIG. 8A.
With respect to FIG. 9B, when a magnification
25 error is detected, and the beams are moved closer
together by rotating the substrate carrying the laser
diodes 12a-12e, and a servo system (not shown) is used
to adjust the spacing of the photodetector elements
responsive to the beam spacing, for example, by
30 rotating the substrate carrying photodetector elements
34-38. Thus, alignment of the beams generated by the
laser diodes and the photodetector elements may be
maintained to correct for magnification errors
CA 02321061 2000-08-14
WO 99/46769 PCT/EP99/01522
- 23 -
resulting from track pitch variations. The movement of
photodetector elements 34-38 in FIG. 9H is also
described by equation (4).
With respect to FIG. 10, in an alternative
approach to moving photodetector elements 39-38, the
individual photodetector elements 34-38 may be replaced
by detector 60. Detector 60 preferably includes
multiple pixels 61 that are employed to image each
track. Track detection methods may be used to
10 determine which of the pixels 61 carrespond to the
beams reflected from the disk, independent of the bean
spacing. Thus, when magnification error correction
causes the spacings between beams reflected onto
detector 60 to vary, the outputs of pixels 61 may be
15 re-ordered to maintain proper alignment. Electronic
track detector apparatus and methods suitable for this
purpose are described in commonly assigned U.S. Patent
Nos. 5, 701, 283, 5, 652, 746, 5, 627, 805, and 5, 598, 393,
which are incorporated herein by reference.
20 One skilled in the art will appreciate that
the present invention may be practiced by other than
the disclosed embodiments, which are present for
purposes of illustration and not of limitation, and
that the present invention is limited only by the
25 claims which follow.
