Language selection

Search

Patent 2323129 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2323129
(54) English Title: BOTTLE CAP
(54) French Title: CAPSULE POUR BOUTEILLE
Status: Term Expired - Post Grant Beyond Limit
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • B65D 41/32 (2006.01)
  • B65D 41/34 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • WITT, STEVE (Canada)
  • COULSON, RICHARD (Canada)
(73) Owners :
  • STANPAC INC.
(71) Applicants :
  • STANPAC INC. (Canada)
(74) Agent: SMART & BIGGAR LP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2005-06-21
(22) Filed Date: 2000-10-11
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 2002-04-11
Examination requested: 2001-12-17
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data: None

Abstracts

English Abstract

A one piece molded push-on tamper resistant closure suited for reusable bottles such as milk bottles comprises a cap portion and a latch ring portion connected thereto by frangible tabs. Ruptures of the tabs serves to detach the cap portion to permit its removal from the bottle, while simultaneously opening the latch ring portion to permit it to be removed laterally from the neck of the bottle. The closure includes a latch ring removal tab disposed on the latch ring portion to provide a levered force for rupturing the frangible tabs.


French Abstract

Fermeture inviolable à pression, moulée en une seule pièce, adaptée à des bouteilles réutilisables telles que des bouteilles de lait, comprenant une portion de capuchon et une portion de bague de blocage raccordée à celui-ci par des languettes frangibles. La rupture des languettes permet de détacher la portion de capuchon pour son retrait de la bouteille, tout en ouvrant simultanément la portion de bague de blocage pour son retrait latéral du goulot de la bouteille. La fermeture inclut une languette de retrait de bague de blocage disposée sur la portion de bague de blocage pour fournir une force de levier afin de rompre les languettes frangibles.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


-8-
WE CLAIM:
1. A one piece molded tamper resistant push-on closure
suitable for closing a glass bottle, comprising:
a latch ring portion having an upper and lower
peripheral margin, an inwardly directed surface extending
therebetween, and a plurality of circumferentially spaced
slots through said inwardly directed surface,
a plurality of resiliently deformable teeth
depending from said latch ring portion in an upwardly
inwardly direction relative to said inwardly directed
surface, each said tooth including an integral bead
adapted to project through one of said slots of the latch
ring portion as said latch ring is engaged onto the neck
of a bottle, thereby locking the latch ring against vertical displacement;
a cap portion having a lower peripheral margin and
an inwardly directed surface extending from said lower
margin thereof:
a plurality of frangible tabs interconnecting said
cap portion and said latch ring portion; and
a manually engagable tab projecting from said latch
ring portion for the application thereto of a suitable
manual force to progressively rupture said frangible tabs
and permit said cap to be removed from said bottle when
said closure is applied thereto.
2. A closure as defined in claim 1, wherein said cap
portion includes a flat dome and a stopper downwardly
depending therefrom for engaging within the neck of a
bottle to provide a liquid tight seal therewith.
3. A closure as defined in claim 2, wherein said
stopper has a tubular cross section.

-9-
4. A closure as defined in claim 3, wherein said
tubular cross section has a maximum diametric dimension
intermediate the axial ends of said stopper.
5. A closure as defined in claim 1, wherein said
frangible tabs interconnect upper peripheral marginal
portions of said latch ring portion and lower peripheral
marginal portions of said cap portion.
6. A closure as defined in claim 1, wherein said latch
ring portion is in the form of an annulus which opens
when said frangible tabs are ruptured to detach said cap
portion from said latch ring portion, thereby permitting
said latch ring portion to be removed from the neck of a
bottle in a transverse direction.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02323129 2000-10-11
S
BOTTLE CAP
FIELD OF INVENTION
This invention relates to improved tamper resistant
push on assemblies for containers. It is particularly
useful in connection with re-usable glass bottles such as
milk bottles, but not necessarily limited to such use.
BACKGROUND OF INVENTION
Bottles in the nature of milk bottles were
conventionally closed by means of friction fitted
cardboard disks, crimped on aluminum foil caps and
crimped on paper caps, none of which are tamper
resistant.
Although there had been described a number of tamper
resistant closures for screw bottles, as for example
shown in U.S. Patent No. 4,394,918, we did not regard it
as practical to convert re-usable glass bottles such as
milk bottles to screw type bottles simply to allow
existing tamper resistant closures to be used, given the
major capital cost involved in such conversion.
Moreover, as a result of the relatively large diameter of
the necks of bottles of this type and the relatively wide
tolerances to which such bottles are manufactured, it was
also viewed as impractical to construct tamper resistant
closures on the basis of expedience such as ratcheting
teeth.
With a view to providing a one piece molded tamper
resistant push-on closure particularly suited for closing
glass bottles which would be readily adaptable for use
with existing closure machinery, we earlier devised the
closure described and claimed in our U.S. Patent No.
5,875,908. That one piece molded tamper resistant push-
on closure comprises a latch ring portion and a cap
portion, the latch portion including a plurality of
integral, upwardly inwardly angled teeth for snap

CA 02323129 2000-10-11
-2-
retaining the latch ring portion beneath a shoulder
associated with the bottle when the closure in pushed
onto the bottle, while restricting detachment of the
closure therefrom. The latch ring portion and the cap
portion of the closure are connected by a plurality of
frangible tabs, some of which serve to retain the latch
ring portion in the form of a closed annulus. The cap
portion includes a pull tab disposed on a peripheral
portion thereof. By exerting a moderate force on the
pull tab the aforementioned frangible tabs are ruptured,
opening the annulus to permit the latch ring portion to
be moved transversely from engagement above the neck of
the bottle.
We have since discovered that, with certain types of
bottles having particular contours and dimensions of the
upper rim of the bottle and the shoulder below the upper
rim it is occasionally possible, with some effort, to
prise a closure according to the '908 patent from the
bottle, without rupturing the frangible tabs so as to
provide clear visual evidence of tampering.
In order to provide a one piece molded tamper
resistant push-on closure that is suited for closing
glass bottles such as milk bottles, even where the rim
and shoulder shape associated with the bottle opening are
unusual or irregular, we found it advantageous to design
more aggressive means for locking the closure in place,
but without diminishing the ease of legitimate removal of
the closure by tearing away the latch ring.
It is an object of the present invention to provide
such an improved one piece molded tamper resistant push-
on closure for glass bottles which need not be assembled
on the neck of the bottle and which is readily adapted
for use with existing closure machinery.
It is another object of this invention to provide
such closures with frangible members that can be ruptured

CA 02323129 2000-10-11
-3-
without the necessity of using excessive force.
It is still a further object of this invention to
provide such closures that are easily removable to permit
the re-use of the bottle.
SUN~1ARY OF THE INVENTION
In accordance with a broad aspect of the invention,
a one piece molded tamper resistant push-on closure
suitable for closing glass bottles comprises a latch ring
portion having an upper and lower peripheral margin, an
inwardly directed surface extending therebetween, and a
plurality of circumferentially spaced slots therethrough.
A plurality of resiliently deformable teeth depends from
the latch ring in an upwardly inwardly direction relative
to the interior surface thereof, each said tooth
presenting on its surface an integral bead of a shape and
disposition adapted to project through a corresponding
one of said slots through the latch ring portion as the
latch ring is engaged onto the neck of a bottle.
The closure of the invention further comprises a cap
portion having a lower peripheral margin and an inwardly
directed surface extending upwardly from the lower
peripheral margin thereof. A plurality of frangible tabs
connect between the latch ring portion and the cap
portion. A manually engagable tab integral with.the
latch ring portion projects outwardly from the latch ring
portion. Application of a suitable manual force to the
tab with progressively rupture the frangible tabs and
permit the cap to be removed from the bottle to which the
closure has been applied.
In this arrangement, force exerted on the projecting
tab is applied at one radial point rather than about the
whole of the periphery of the cap and results in the more
or less serial rupture of the frangible tabs, rather than
their being ruptured simultaneously. Accordingly, it is

CA 02323129 2000-10-11
-4-
found that the force necessary to disengage the cap from
the latch ring using the manually engagable tab is well
within the capability of the average person, while the
cumulative force is sufficiently high as to reduce the
likelihood of an inadvertent detachment.
In a preferred embodiment, the manually engagable
tab is in the form of a part-parabolic convex projection
having a rearward truncated wall surface acutely angled
to a diameter of the closure therethrough for comfortable
accommodation of the tip a user's thumb or finger,
affording the grip and leverage needed to break the first
frangible tabs and so permit tearing away of the latch
ring portion.
Generally speaking, the upper end of the cap portion
will be in the form of a flat dome, and suitably a
stopper will depend downwardly from the dome to provide a
liquid tight seal with the interior surface of the
bottle. Desirably, the stopper will have a tubular
cross-section so as to be resiliently deformable and
accommodate normal variations found in glass milk
bottles, for example. Also preferably, the stopper will
have a maximum external diameter intermediate the axial
ends thereof so as to facilitate the initial engagement
of the stopper in the neck of the bottle and to localize
sealing forces.
Also preferably, the latch ring is in the form of an
open annulus which permits is ready removal from the neck
of a bottle once the frangible tabs have been ruptured.
The foregoing objects and aspects of the invention,
together with other objects, aspects and advantages
thereof will be more apparent from a consideration of the
following description of the preferred embodiment thereof
taken in conjunction with the drawings annexed hereto.

CA 02323129 2000-10-11
-5-
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 shows a bottle cap in accordance with the
invention in perspective view, together with a portion of
a milk bottle;
S FIG. 2 shows the bottle cap of FIG. 1 in elevation,
facing toward the latch ring removal tab;
FIG. 3 is a plan view from above of the bottle cap
of FIG. l:
FIG. 4 is a section along line A-A of FIG. 3 in the
direction of the arrows;
FIG. 5 is a further plan view from above of the
bottle cap of FIG. 1, but rotationally displaced from the
view of FIG. 3 to put the region of the closure including
the latch ring removal tab in the upper half the drawing;
FIG. 6 is a section along line B-B of FIG. 5,
including that portion of the closure including the latch
ring removal tab; and
FIG. 7 is a plan view from below from the bottle cap
of FIG. 1.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
Referring to the drawings in detail, a bottle
closure in accordance with the invention is denoted
generally by the numeral 10. Bottle closure 10 comprises
a cap portion 20 defined in part by a lower peripheral
margin 22, a cover 24 and inwardly directed surface 26
extending therebetween.
Closure 10 further comprises a latch ring 30 defined
in part by a lower peripheral margin 32, an upper
peripheral margin 34, and inwardly directed surface 36
therebetween. A plurality of elongate rectangular slots
37 through latch ring 30 are regularly disposed around an
upper portion 30a of the latch ring. A corresponding
plurality of resiliently deformable teeth 38 depend
upwardly inwardly from the lower peripheral margin 32 of

CA 02323129 2005-02-15
-6-
the latch ring. Each of these teeth includes an
outwardly directed integral locking bead 39, the slots 37
and beads 39 being dimensioned such that the deformation
of teeth 38 when the closure 10 is push fitted onto a .
bottle neck N results in the fitting of the beads through
- slots, therebylocking the latch ring against vertical
displacement, as will be further described.
A plurality of frangible tabs 40 interconnect the
upper peripheral margin 34 of the latch ring 30 to, the
lower peripheral margin 22 of the cap portion 20, to
integrate the two portions. Latch ring portion 30 is in
the form of an open annulus.
The cover 24 of cap portion 20 is generally in the
form of a flat dome, and a stopper 42 is downwardly
dependent therefrom. Stopper 42 has a tubular cross-
section with a portion 46 of maximum diameter
intermediate the axial ends of the stopper.
The structure of closure 10 as described is such
that the closure is moldable in one piece, with teeth 38
angled inwardly upwardly as illustrated, which avoids the
necessity of a separate operation to re-form the teeth
following the initial molding step. This unitary
operation permits the diameter of the inwardly directed
surface 36 of latch ring portion 30 to be closely
controlled so as to provide a_close friction fit for the
latch ring portion over the neck of a bottle with the
greatest design diameter, while permitting its use. with
bottles with smaller necks within the normally
anticipated tolerance range.
In use, closure l0 is applied to bottle B using
,standard bottle capping machinery by merely pushing the
cover about the opening into the bottle. This will cause
teeth 38 to be deformed so that their associated locking
beads 39 project through corresponding slots 37 and
engage lockingly with the walls thereof.

CA 02323129 2005-02-15
_7_
Unlike the bottle cap described and claimed in our
U.S. Patent No. 5,875,908, the locking of the intact-.
closure 10 is not only effected -by the latching of
locking teeth of the latch ring under the shoulder S of a
bottle rim (which can depart from size tolerance), but
- also by the locking of the teeth 38 in place on the
tamper-evident band itself, i.e., on the latch ring
portion 30, by the engagement of locking beads 39 with
slots 37. In the result, it is practically impossible to
remove closure 10 manually without destroying the
integrity of the latch ring portion and producing obvious
signs of tampering. The fitting of closure 10 in this
manner will cause stopper 92 to enter into the neck N of
bottle B and be compressed to form a tight liquid seal.
l5 To remove closure 10 from the bottle initially, a
levering force -is applied by the thumb or fingers to
latch ring removal tab 44 to rupture frangible tabs 40.
Tab 44 may advantageously be molded integrally to the
upper portion of the latch ring 30a, in the form of a
convex paraboloidal dome having an oblique rear wall 49a
to receive finger or thumbnail pressure. The rupturing
force applied to tab 44 will serve to progressively break
the frangible tabs, thereby permitting cap portion 20 to
be removed from the bottle. This, in turn, permits the
latch ring portion to be removed from the neck of the
bottle in a transverse manner under a negligible force,
and this removal is likely to arise at the time when a
user first removes the cap portion 20 from bottle B.
Although a particular embodiment of the invention.
has been illustrated and described herein, one of
ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that changes or
additions may be made to the design of the closure
without departing from the spirit and scope of the
invention, which is defined in the claims attached
hereto .

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: Expired (new Act pat) 2020-10-13
Common Representative Appointed 2019-10-30
Common Representative Appointed 2019-10-30
Change of Address or Method of Correspondence Request Received 2018-01-12
Inactive: Correspondence - Transfer 2014-11-19
Inactive: Office letter 2014-11-12
Letter Sent 2014-11-12
Inactive: Single transfer 2014-10-24
Letter Sent 2012-02-09
Inactive: Multiple transfers 2012-01-25
Letter Sent 2010-09-16
Inactive: Correspondence - Transfer 2010-08-17
Inactive: Correspondence - Transfer 2010-06-29
Inactive: Multiple transfers 2010-05-14
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Grant by Issuance 2005-06-21
Inactive: Cover page published 2005-06-20
Pre-grant 2005-04-06
Inactive: Final fee received 2005-04-06
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2005-03-10
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2005-03-10
Letter Sent 2005-03-10
Inactive: Approved for allowance (AFA) 2005-03-01
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2005-02-15
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2004-10-04
Inactive: Cover page published 2002-04-12
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 2002-04-11
Letter Sent 2002-02-21
Inactive: Entity size changed 2002-02-07
Inactive: Corrective payment - RFE 2002-02-07
Inactive: <RFE date> RFE removed 2002-02-07
Reinstatement Request Received 2001-12-17
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 2001-12-17
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 2001-12-17
Letter Sent 2001-03-02
Request for Examination Received 2001-02-19
Letter Sent 2001-02-14
Inactive: Single transfer 2001-01-26
Inactive: First IPC assigned 2000-12-08
Inactive: Filing certificate - No RFE (English) 2000-11-21
Inactive: Courtesy letter - Evidence 2000-11-21
Filing Requirements Determined Compliant 2000-11-21
Application Received - Regular National 2000-11-20

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2001-12-17

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2004-07-19

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
STANPAC INC.
Past Owners on Record
RICHARD COULSON
STEVE WITT
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Representative drawing 2002-03-14 1 9
Cover Page 2002-04-12 1 30
Description 2000-10-11 7 340
Abstract 2000-10-11 1 17
Claims 2000-10-11 2 64
Drawings 2000-10-11 5 129
Description 2005-02-15 7 338
Drawings 2005-02-15 5 129
Claims 2005-02-15 2 64
Representative drawing 2005-05-27 1 9
Cover Page 2005-05-27 1 33
Filing Certificate (English) 2000-11-21 1 164
Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 2001-03-02 1 179
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2001-02-14 1 113
Reminder of maintenance fee due 2002-06-12 1 111
Commissioner's Notice - Application Found Allowable 2005-03-10 1 162
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2010-09-16 1 103
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2012-02-09 1 127
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2014-11-12 1 102
Correspondence 2000-11-20 1 14
Correspondence 2001-12-17 1 74
Fees 2003-07-24 1 28
Fees 2002-06-25 1 35
Fees 2004-07-19 1 36
Correspondence 2005-04-06 1 23
Fees 2005-06-27 1 26
Fees 2006-07-10 1 27
Fees 2007-07-04 1 29
Fees 2008-07-09 1 34
Fees 2009-07-08 1 35
Fees 2010-06-23 1 33
Correspondence 2014-11-12 1 40