Language selection

Search

Patent 2337594 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2337594
(54) English Title: NON-DESTRUCTIVE OIL RECOVERY METHOD
(54) French Title: METHODE NON DESTRUCTIVE DE RECUPERATION DU PETROLE
Status: Deemed Abandoned and Beyond the Period of Reinstatement - Pending Response to Notice of Disregarded Communication
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C10G 1/04 (2006.01)
  • B08B 3/08 (2006.01)
  • B09C 1/02 (2006.01)
  • C09K 3/32 (2006.01)
  • C23G 1/14 (2006.01)
  • E01H 1/00 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • DAUM, GEORGE KEVIN (Canada)
(73) Owners :
  • GEORGE KEVIN DAUM
(71) Applicants :
  • GEORGE KEVIN DAUM (Canada)
(74) Agent:
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(22) Filed Date: 2001-02-20
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 2002-08-20
Examination requested: 2006-02-20
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data: None

Abstracts

English Abstract


A method of non-destructive recovery of oil or
other petroleum hydrocarbon from a contaminated
substrate comprises the steps of separating the
hydrocarbon substantially intact from the substrate by
applying a hydrocarbon removing agent to the substrate
and collecting the hydrocarbon separated from the
substrate. The separation of the hydrocarbon is
effected by applying a separation agent, such as an
alkali, to the substrate to effect adhesion failure of
the hydrocarbon, thereby to release the hydrocarbon
intact from the substrate and applying a surfactant to
suspend the hydrocarbon removed from the substrate. The
separation agent and the surfactant collectively
comprise the hydrocarbon removing agent which can be
applied as an aqueous solution.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


-11-
THE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION IN WHICH AN EXCLUSIVE
PROPERTY OR PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
1. A method of non destructive recovery of a petroleum
hydrocarbon from a contaminated substrate,
comprising the steps of:
separating the hydrocarbon substantially intact from
the substrate by applying a hydrocarbon removing
agent comprising an aqueous solution of an alkali
and a surfactant to the substrate; and
collecting the hydrocarbon separated from the
substrate.
2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the alkali
comprises potassium hydroxide.
3. The method according to claim 2, wherein the
surfactant comprises an enzyme based ionic
surfactant.
4. A method of non destructive recovery of a petroleum
hydrocarbon from a contaminated substrate,
comprising the steps of:
separating the hydrocarbon substantially intact from
the substrate by applying a hydrocarbon removing
agent to the substrate; and
collecting the hydrocarbon separated from the
substrate, wherein said separating the hydrocarbon
from the substrate comprises the steps of:
applying a separation agent to the substrate to
effect adhesion failure of the hydrocarbon, thereby

-12-
to release the hydrocarbon intact from the
substrate; and
applying a surfactant to suspend the hydrocarbon
removed from the substrate;
said separation agent and said surfactant
collectively comprising said hydrocarbon removing
agent.
5. The method according to claim 4, wherein the
separation agent and the surfactant are applied to
the substrate as a mixture constituting said
hydrocarbon removing agent.
6. The method according to claim 4, wherein the
separation agent comprises an alkali in aqueous
solution, which aqueous solution also contains the
surfactant.
7. The method according to claim 6 wherein the alkali
comprises potassium hydroxide.
8. The method according to claim 6, wherein the alkali
is present in an amount of from about 1 to about
50% by volume of the total volume of the aqueous
solution.
9. The method according to claim 4, wherein the
surfactant comprises an enzyme based ionic
surfactant.
10. The method according to claim 5, wherein the
substrate is porous and the surfactant is added to
the mixture constituting said hydrocarbon removing

-13-
agent in an amount which is proportional to the
porosity of the substrate.
11. The method according to claim 4, wherein said
substrate comprises the surface of a motor vehicle
parking lot.
12. The method according to claim 4, wherein said
substrate comprises the surface of an oil tank for
heating oil.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02337594 2001-02-20
NON-DESTRUCTIV$ OIL RECOVERY METHOD
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to the removal and
recovery of waste oil or other petroleum hydrocarbons
from substrates, particularly the non-destructive
removal of such waste products.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
When petroleum hydrocarbons, such as motor
oil, brake fluids, heating oils and the like, are
deposited on a porous or non-porous substrate, it
adheres to the surface. This results in a contaminated
substrate with undesirable environmental and commercial
effects.
In the first instance, where the contaminated
substrate is no longer useful for its original purpose,
such as in the case of oil tanks for heating oil, the
resulting contaminated material is not recyclable and
the used tanks are stored in a dump. If conventional
methods and chemicals were to be used to clean the
tanks, the resulting hazardous and toxic effluent would
need to be incinerated or land filled, which only
relocates the pollution.
In the second instance, where the removal and
relocation of the substrate is not possible or feasible,
such as in the case of driving and parking surfaces for
motor vehicles, the petroleum deposits on the surfaces
are washed away by rain water or wash Water, resulting
in pollution. Removal of the accumulated hydrocarbons
using conventional methods and chemical degreasers
results in chemical mixtures of questionable or
undetermined properties that are not recyclable or
illegal to discharge. In this instance, the effluent

CA 02337594 2001-02-20
- 2 -
must be relocated, which results in simply transferring
the pollution from one location to another. This
detracts from the commercial viability of the process.
If a surface has high porosity (such as
asphalt), typically a solvent, such as gasoline,
kerosene or mineral spirits, can be employed to remove a
petroleum hydrocarbon deposit, hereinafter simply
referred to as "oil". If adhesion of the oil to the
surface has occurred, the solvent must be of sufficient
strength to dissolve the oil and penetrate to the
substrate. Apart from creating a fire hazard, there are
three inherent problems associated with this method.
The first is that when attempting to remove refined
petroleum hydrocarbon from an asphalt surface, the
solvent used must be of sufficient strength to penetrate
the surface deposit. As a result, the strong solvent
emulsifies a large part of the asphalt along with the
deposit and leaves a residue that can become flammable.
Technically, this is considered destructive removal, and
will contribute to accelerating the breakdown of the
asphalt as well as acting as a bond breaker if a coating
or sealant is to be applied to the surface after
cleaning. The second problem is that the resulting
effluent may not be recyclable depending on the solvent.
The third problem is that the solvent will disperse the
hydrocarbon and leave a residue. It does not suspend
the hydrocarbon to allow for removal. In the case of
asphalt, a large stain will be apparent after washing,
requiring further treatment for removal.
The same problems that occur with the above
solvents occur with commercially available degreasers
and detergents. However, typically these products are
not of sufficient strength to penetrate the oil and thus
overcome the adhesion of the oil to the surface.

CA 02337594 2001-02-20
- 3 -
Acids, bleaches, paint strippers contaminate
the waste effluent beyond repair and are not recyclable.
It is an object of the present invention to
alleviate the above-mentioned difficulties.
SU1~2AR,Y OF THE INVENTION
According to the invention there is provided a
method of non destructive recovery of a petroleum
hydrocarbon from a contaminated substrate, comprising
the steps of separating the hydrocarbon substantially
intact from the substrate by applying a hydrocarbon
removing agent comprising an aqueous solution of an
alkali and a surfactant to the substrate; and collecting
the hydrocarbon separated from the substrate.
Also according to the invention, there is
provided a method of non destructive recovery of a
petroleum hydrocarbon from a contaminated substrate,
comprising the steps of separating the hydrocarbon
substantially intact from the substrate by applying a
hydrocarbon removing agent to the substrate; and
collecting the hydrocarbon separated from the substrate,
wherein said separating the hydrocarbon from the
substrate comprises the steps of applying a separation
agent to the substrate to effect adhesion failure of the
hydrocarbon, thereby to release the hydrocarbon intact
from the substrate; and applying a surfactant to suspend
the hydrocarbon removed from the substrate; said
separation agent and said surfactant collectively
comprising said hydrocarbon removing agent.

CA 02337594 2001-02-20
- 4 -
Further objects and advantages of the
invention will become apparent from the description of
preferred embodiments of the invention below.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
According to one embodiment of the invention,
the recovery of deposited oil or other petroleum
hydrocarbons (hereafter generally referred to as
"deposit" or "deposits") from paved surfaces for the
purpose of recycling, comprises several steps, i.e.:
(i) Penetration of the deposit;
(ii) separation of the deposit from the
surface, i.e. effecting "adhesion
failure" of the deposit;
(iii) suspension and movement of the
deposit; and
(iv) collection and neutralization of the
product.
The first two steps are applied to achieve
penetration and separation of the deposit from the paved
surface without contaminating or damaging the petroleum
hydrocarbon. To accomplish this objective, an alkali,
such as potassium hydroxide (KOH), in aqueous solution
with a surfactant, is used. The concentrations of the
alkali and surfactant can be varied depending on the
porosity of the substrate and the adhesion level of the
petroleum hydrocarbon, as well as the amount of
hydrocarbon present. The very properties of refined
petroleum that make it useful for lubrication of moving
parts, such as high temperature resistance and
viscosity, are the same properties which cause the
difficulty in penetrating an oil stain to effect
adhesion failure. Thus, the use of acids and/or

CA 02337594 2001-02-20
- 5 -
bleaching agents for removing oil stains in conventional
methods.
The best way to understand why a cleaning
chemical must accomplish all three objectives of
penetration, separation, or adhesion failure, and
suspension without damaging the petroleum hydrocarbon so
that the deposit can be collected and recycled, is to
explain first what constitutes a "petroleum hydrocarbon
stained substrate" and what does not. A stained paved
or driving surface occurs when spilled petroleum
hydrocarbon has penetrated and has been allowed
sufficient time to adhere to the substrate. If motor
oil is spilt on a clean cement surface and immediately
scrubbed with household dish washing liquid and water,
all or most of the oil can be removed. Recycling of the
material would then be a matter of collection, be it
recyclable absorbent material, pressure washing,
vacuuming or a combination of these methods. In the
above situation, adhesion has not occurred and thus the
surface is technically not stained. Vrhen the substrate
is stained, a bond or adhesion occurs between the oil
and the surface. If the same motor oil is spilt and
left for several days, the oil has time to penetrate the
surface and adhere or bond. If it is attempted to clean
this same surface with household dish washing liquid and
water, only the surface oil is removed. The same is
true for the majority of commercially available
degreasers. This is why acid washing has become the
preferred method of oil stain removal in conventional
methods.
The present method of causing adhesion failure
to occur, comprises adjusting the amount of alkali in
the cleaning agent according to the substrate and
allowing an appropriate dwell time so that the agent can

CA 02337594 2001-02-20
- 6 -
penetrate the hydrocarbon stain. This process can be
accelerated by increasing the concentration of the
alkali component in the cleaner, as well as using
mechanical means, such as increasing the application
pressure of the cleaning equipment as well as the water
temperature, since neither mechanical attack or hot
water is not sufficient on its own. The alkali
component of the cleaner is adjusted from about l~ to
about 50~ of by volume of the total volume of aqueous
solution containing the alkali and the surfactant.
The third step comprises suspension of the
hydrocarbon and movement of the resulting suspended
hydrocarbon and cleaner emulsion. When the bond between
the petroleum hydrocarbon and the substrate is
successfully broken, collection of the oil becomes
possible. Typically, pressure washing is employed to
move the oil to collection material or equipment and/or
it is flushed down the drain. However, during this
procedure, oil may disperse over a large area and leave
a large stain or residue. This stain increases in
direct proportion to the porosity of the substrate. To
avoid this problem, the cleaning agent also comprises a
surfactant or suspension agent that suspends the oil so
that it can be moved without settling back onto the
surface. The surfactant may comprise an enzyme based
ionic surfactant. The concentration of the surfactant
is adjusted according to the substrate so that the oil
droplets do not coalesce in portions large enough to be
re-deposited on the surface. The amount of surfactant
must be increased in proportion to the porosity of the
surface and the amount of hydrocarbon. The objective is
the suspension of the hydrocarbon. In most field
applications the percentage of surfactant is between 1
and 5~ by volume of the aqueous solution i.e. about l~
for a low porosity surface, about 3~ for a medium

CA 02337594 2001-02-20
porosity surface and about 5~ for a high porosity
surface. The amount of surfactant can be adjusted on
location as required by the person doing the work. The
higher the percentage of surfactant the greater the
suspension capacity. If desired, the cleaning agent may
comprise more than one surfactant.
The fourth step comprises collection and
neutralization of the emulsion. Neutralization is
necessary when the alkali portion of the cleaner is too
high for discharge. Neutral pH is considered to be
between 7 and 7.5. When the emulsion is neutralized,
the resulting material is petroleum, hydrocarbon, salt
and water. The objective of this part of the process is
to collect the hydrocarbon in such a manner that it can
be recycled. Assuming the hydrocarbon was not damaged
or contaminated in the previous steps, the hydrocarbon
can be collected by using absorbent material that can be
blended into the emulsion and/or by using absorbent
material that can be cleaned and reused. In the case
where an oil and water separator is available or the
effluent is vacuumed and collected, it can be placed
directly into this equipment for separation and
recycling.
Generally, paved surfaces fall into three main
categories:
(a) Asphalt, being typically a driving
surface composed of a combination of low
grade petroleum obtained as residue in
the refining process and aggregate of
varying mass.
(b) Cement type surfaces, either poured in
place or prefabricated and installed.

CA 02337594 2001-02-20
This category primarily includes bricks,
payers, cement and concrete slabs.
(c) Traffic membrane which is not to be
confused with sealers. Traffic
membranes are typically combinations of
epoxies and/or urethanes that are
overlain on top of other driving
surfaces for the purpose of
waterproofing and abrasion resistance.
A more detailed description of the process for
each of the above surface types is given below. In the
following description the hydrocarbon is referred to as
"oil".
(a) Asphalt: On older asphalt, a stronger
mixture of oil remover can be used (35
to 50~ by weight KOH) to penetrate the
oil. On newer asphalt, 20~ KOH is
sufficient. The cleaner is applied to
the stained area and allowed to dwell
for 20 to 40 minutes. When the alkali
portion of the cleaner has penetrated to
the surface and caused adhesion failure,
the enzyme based surfactant will suspend
the oil. Sufficient dwell time can be
identified when a stain can be wiped
clean and the cleaning solution under
the oil is not saturated with oil. At
this point, depending on the collection
method the resulting effluent or
emulsion can be neutralized. The
surfactant component of the cleaner will
still suspend the oil. To increase
production speed, a mixture of l~ KOH

CA 02337594 2001-02-20
_ g _
can be sprayed on the parking lot
surface. This simply assists in moving
the waste oil over the surface.
However, prior to discharge of the
effluent, pH levels need to be tested.
Ideal pH is between 7 and 7.5. The
majority of the oil can be collected at
the stain by using absorbent material
that can be blended with the effluent or
cleaned and/or vacuuming and then
separating the oil for recycling. For
production purposes, using a pressure
washer to move the effluent to a
centralized collection area is generally
preferable. The neutralized effluent
can also be flushed into an oil water
separator as the cleaning agent has not
contaminated the waste oil.
(b) Cement: Depending on the porosity of the
surface, the alkali component of the
cleaner is adjusted to between 10 and
20~ by weight. The dwell time of the
cleaner is between 15 to 40 minutes.
The cleaning method is the same as for
asphalt, except that the surfactant does
not need to be pre-sprayed on the rest
of the surface due to the lower porosity
of the surface.
(c) Traffic membranes: If adhesion has
occurred, typically a dilution of 2 to
10~ by weight of KOH is sufficient to
cause adhesive failure and suspension.
At this point, the same cleaning method
as above applies.

CA 02337594 2001-02-20
- 10 -
The method of wiping the surface to test for
sufficient dwell time ascertains whether all the
required steps have been effected, excluding moving,
collecting and recycling. On asphalt, the cleaner will
suspend the oil and the cleaner will be the same colour
and texture as unused cleaner and the asphalt will be
slippery and will not emulsify in the chemical. A
stronger cleaner or chemical will emulsify the asphalt
and the mixture will be black. A weaker mixture will
not penetrate and again the mixture will be black. On
cement and traffic membranes, the same effect applies.
The substrate can be inspected visually. If a cleaner
is to strong, etching or damage to a membrane can occur,
this will contaminate the waste effluent and negate the
process.
While only preferred embodiments of the
invention have been described herein in detail, the
invention is not limited thereby and modifications can
be made within the scope of the attached claims.

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 2337594 was not found.

Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: IPC expired 2013-01-01
Inactive: IPC removed 2012-12-31
Letter Sent 2011-03-09
Inactive: Office letter 2011-02-03
Inactive: Dead - No reply to s.30(2) Rules requisition 2010-09-30
Application Not Reinstated by Deadline 2010-09-30
Inactive: Abandoned - No reply to s.29 Rules requisition 2009-09-30
Inactive: Abandoned - No reply to s.30(2) Rules requisition 2009-09-30
Inactive: Delete abandonment 2009-06-01
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2009-03-30
Inactive: Abandoned - No reply to Office letter 2009-03-30
Inactive: S.29 Rules - Examiner requisition 2009-03-30
Inactive: Office letter 2009-01-22
Revocation of Agent Requirements Determined Compliant 2009-01-22
Change of Address or Method of Correspondence Request Received 2009-01-19
Inactive: Office letter 2009-01-08
Revocation of Agent Requirements Determined Compliant 2008-12-29
Inactive: Office letter 2008-12-29
Revocation of Agent Request 2008-12-16
Inactive: Adhoc Request Documented 2008-11-12
Inactive: Office letter 2008-11-12
Revocation of Agent Request 2008-10-29
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2006-03-16
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Letter Sent 2006-03-09
Inactive: Entity size changed 2006-02-20
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 2006-02-20
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 2006-02-20
Request for Examination Received 2006-02-20
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 2002-08-20
Inactive: Cover page published 2002-08-19
Inactive: IPC assigned 2001-04-19
Inactive: IPC assigned 2001-04-19
Inactive: IPC assigned 2001-04-19
Inactive: IPC assigned 2001-04-19
Inactive: First IPC assigned 2001-04-19
Application Received - Regular National 2001-03-22
Filing Requirements Determined Compliant 2001-03-22
Inactive: Filing certificate - No RFE (English) 2001-03-22
Small Entity Declaration Determined Compliant 2001-02-20

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2009-01-28

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
Application fee - small 2001-02-20
MF (application, 2nd anniv.) - small 02 2003-02-20 2003-02-20
MF (application, 3rd anniv.) - small 03 2004-02-20 2004-01-30
2005-02-21
MF (application, 4th anniv.) - small 04 2005-02-21 2005-02-21
Request for examination - standard 2006-02-20
MF (application, 5th anniv.) - small 05 2006-02-20 2006-02-20
2006-02-20
MF (application, 6th anniv.) - standard 06 2007-02-20 2007-02-16
MF (application, 7th anniv.) - standard 07 2008-02-20 2007-11-23
MF (application, 9th anniv.) - small 09 2010-02-22 2009-01-28
MF (application, 8th anniv.) - small 08 2009-02-20 2009-01-28
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
GEORGE KEVIN DAUM
Past Owners on Record
None
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Cover Page 2002-08-09 1 30
Description 2001-02-20 10 392
Abstract 2001-02-20 1 23
Claims 2001-02-20 3 73
Filing Certificate (English) 2001-03-22 1 161
Reminder of maintenance fee due 2002-10-22 1 109
Reminder - Request for Examination 2005-10-24 1 115
Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 2006-03-09 1 177
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (R30(2)) 2009-12-23 1 164
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (R29) 2009-12-23 1 164
Notice: Maintenance Fee Reminder 2010-11-23 1 120
Fees 2003-02-20 1 39
Fees 2004-01-30 1 34
Fees 2005-02-21 1 36
Fees 2006-02-20 1 33
Fees 2007-02-16 1 33
Correspondence 2008-10-29 2 58
Correspondence 2008-11-12 1 18
Correspondence 2008-12-16 2 62
Correspondence 2008-12-29 1 16
Correspondence 2009-01-22 1 24
Correspondence 2008-11-29 1 33
Correspondence 2009-01-19 1 15
Fees 2009-01-28 4 367
Correspondence 2008-12-29 1 32
Correspondence 2011-02-03 1 21
Fees 2011-01-24 1 70
Correspondence 2011-03-09 1 14
Correspondence 2011-03-03 1 28
Fees 2011-01-24 1 57