Language selection

Search

Patent 2341166 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2341166
(54) English Title: THIN FILM STRAIN SENSORS BASED ON INTERFEROMETRIC OPTICAL MEASUREMENTS
(54) French Title: CAPTEURS DE CONTRAINTE A FILM MINCE POUR MESURES OPTIQUES INTERFEROMETRIQUES
Status: Deemed Abandoned and Beyond the Period of Reinstatement - Pending Response to Notice of Disregarded Communication
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • G01L 01/24 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • EULER, WILLIAM B. (United States of America)
  • GREGORY, OTTO J. (United States of America)
  • HUSTON, GREGG C. (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS FOR HIGHER EDUCATION, STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS
(71) Applicants :
  • THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS FOR HIGHER EDUCATION, STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS (United States of America)
(74) Agent: BORDEN LADNER GERVAIS LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(86) PCT Filing Date: 1999-08-25
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 2000-03-09
Examination requested: 2001-02-19
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/US1999/019601
(87) International Publication Number: US1999019601
(85) National Entry: 2001-02-19

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
60/097,989 (United States of America) 1998-08-26

Abstracts

English Abstract


The invention relates to polymeric/semiconductor thin film strain gauges
comprising visible light from spectrometer (10) which is directed onto a thin
film passive sensor (12) having a transparent glass substrate (14) and a
laminated construction in succession from the substrate (14), of a polyimide
layer (18a), a polysiloxane layer (16a) filled with alumina particles, a
polyimide layer (18b) and a polysiloxane layer (16b) filled with alumina
particles.


French Abstract

L'invention a trait à des jauges de contrainte à film mince polymères/semi-conductrices. De la lumière visible provenant d'un spectromètre (10) est dirigée sur un capteur (12) passif à film mince comportant un substrat (14) de verre transparent et une construction stratifiée qui présente successivement à partir du substrat (14) une couche (18a) de polyimide, une couche (16a) de polysiloxane remplie de particules d'alumine, une couche (18b) de polyimide et une couche (16b) de polysiloxane remplie de particules d'alumine.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


7
1. An interferometric strain gage sensor which comprises:
a support;
a first layer of polymeric material having a first refractive index;
a second layer of polymeric material having a second refractive index which
second refractive index is distinct from the first refractive index, the
sensor having a
gage factor of at least 100 and light energy communicates with the sensor,
when a
strain is applied to the sensor, the light energy is partly absorbed and the
change in
light energy correlates to the strain applied.
2. The sensor of claim 1 which comprises:
a plurality of alternating first and second layers.
3. The sensor of claim 2 wherein the first layer has a refractive index of
approximately 1.6 to 1.7 and is selected from the group consisting of
polyimides and
polycarbonates.
4. The sensor of claim 3 wherein the first layer is polyimide.
5. The sensor of claim 2 wherein the second layer has a refractive index of
about 1.4 and is selected from the group consisting of polysiloxane,
polyethylene,
polypropylene, Teflon R, polyvinylidene fluoride and polyester.
6. The sensor of claim 5 wherein the second layer is polysiloxane.
7. The sensor of claims 4 or 6 wherein the thicknesses of the layers are
between about 1 to 20 microns.
8. The sensor of claim 1 which comprises:
means for contacting the sensor with light energy; and
means for measuring changes in the light energy.
9. The sensor of claim 1 wherein the sensor is a passive sensor and one of
2 said layers is filled with particulate.

8
10. The sensor of claim 9 wherein there are multiple first and second layers
in
alternating relationship, the first layer selected from the group consisting
of polyimides
and polycarbonates, the second layer selected from the group consisting of
polysiloxane, polyethylene, polypropylene, Teflon R, polyvinylidene fluoride
and
polyester.
11. The sensor of claim 10 wherein the first layer is polyimide and the
second layer is polysiloxane filled with aluminum oxide particulate.
12. The sensor of claim 9 which comprises:
means for contacting the sensor with light energy; and
means for measuring changes in the light energy.
13. The sensor of claim 1 wherein the sensor is an active strain gage and
comprises a tube-like support for the first and second layers.
14. The sensor of claim 13 wherein the first layer has a refractive index of
approximately 1.6 to 1.7 and is selected from the group consisting of
polyimides and
polycarbonates, and wherein the second layer has a refractive index of about
1.4 and is
selected from the group consisting of polysiloxane, polyethylene,
polypropylene,
Teflon R, polyvinylidene fluoride and polyester.
15. The sensor of claim 14 wherein the outer most layer is coated with
aluminum.
16. The sensor of claim 15 which comprises:
means for contacting the sensor with light energy; and
means for measuring changes in the light energy.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02341166 2001-02-19
WO 00/12960 PCT/US99/19601
1
Title
Thin Film Strain Sensors Based on Interferometric Optical Measurements
Background of the Invention
1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to polymeric/semiconductor thin film strain gauges
2. Description of the Relevant Art
Many civil engineering structures display fatigue, and occasionally failure,
after
years of exposure to natural forces. In other instances, the failure is a
result of a
catastrophic event, such as an earthquake, tornado, or hurricane. There is a
need for
1o an inexpensive, robust, and sensitive strain gage that is unaffected by
seasonal
environmental variations. Further, such a sensor should be simple, easily
installed,
and readily integrated into modern data communication systems.
The sensor system disclosed herein can monitor the integrity of structures for
the purpose of public safety and maintenance. Specific applications include
building,
road, and bridge integrity. The system employs, as the sensing component,
multiple
optical strain gages that are inexpensive, inert to natural environments, and
physically
robust. Combined with an automated data collection and diagnostic analysis
programming, such sensors and their optical fiber data links can be placed on
the
superstructures and footings of bridges, in the support components of
buildings, or
2o embedded into the surfaces of roads and pedestrian skywalks. The 'health'
of such
structures and surfaces can be automatically monitored and assessed with a
minimum of
human time allocation. Detailed use information would also be valuable in
assessing
the need for routine maintenance or for the need for repair after a potential
catastrophic
loading.
2s Summary of the Invention
The sensitivity and the passivity behavior of the sensors distinguishes from
the
prior art. Current resistive strain sensors have gage factors (the measure of
sensitivity)
of about 2-3. The disclosed sensors have gage factors on the order of 200-800.
It is
not believed the prior art discloses any passive sensors that have a memory
that does

CA 02341166 2001-02-19
WO 00/12960 PCT/US99/19601
2
not rely on a power source.
Thin films of semiconductors or polymers are used to measure strain. The thin
films are layered with each layer consisting of materials with different
refractive
indices. Because each layer has a different refractive index, light that is
introduced
into the composite structure can either be reflected or pass through at each
interface.
This allows interference of the incident light that passes through with light
that is
reflected resulting in a measurable absorption change. The degree of
interference is
sensitive to the refractive index and thickness of each layer. The thickness
of the each
layer changes with application of an external stress. The consequence of this
is that the
~o light absorption changes as a function of strain so that the absorption
change can be
used to measure the strain.
There are two types of interferometric sensors disclosed herein, active and
passive. An active sensor responds to the strain reversibly, i.e. as the
strain changes
the absorption changes in a reversible and predictable fashion. This type of
sensor is
used to measure the existing strain on a structure.
A passive sensor has a memory of the maximum strain experienced by the
structure. For example, if a structure experiences a large deformation ( a
large strain)
but then relaxes to a small rest value, the large deformation is not
reversible. An
active sensor will measure the strain events only if continuously monitored
while the
2o passive sensor will measure only the maximum strain experienced. If the
active sensor
is not being monitored while the maximum strain is occurring, the large strain
excursion will not be observed. The passive sensor overcomes this problem.
Broadly the invention comprises both active and passive sensors which
preferably are used in the same structure. Both sensors are constructed by
layering
materials, either semiconductors or polymers having different refractive
indices. The
sensitivity is increased when the difference in refractive index is maximized
and also as
the number of layers is increased. The passive sensors are constructed by
adding small
particulates to one set of layers.
Brief Description of the Drawings,
3o Fig. 1 is an illustration of a passive sensor;
Figs. 2a and 2b are illustrations of an alternative embodiment of Fig. 1;

CA 02341166 2001-02-19
WO 00/12960 PCT/US99/19601
3
Fig. 3 is a graph of the optical response of an active sensor;
Fig. 4 is a graph of the optical response of an passive sensor; and
Fig. 5 is a graph of the optical response of a passive sensor;
Description of the Preferred Embodiments)
s incident light can be measured in reflectance or transmission to determine
the
strain.
Referring to Fig. 1, reflectance mode, visible light from a spectrometer 10,
such as Perkin Elmer Lambda 2, is directed onto a thin film passive sensor
shown
generally at 12. The sensor 12 comprises a transparent glass substrate 14 and
a
laminated construction in succession from the substrate 14, of a polyimide
layer 18a, a
polysiloxane layer 16a filled with alumina particles, a polyimide layer 18b
and a
polysiloxane layer 16b filled with alumina particles. The incident light beam
is normal
to the sensor surface. The light is collected along the incidence beam path in
a
photomultiplier tube detector 20 in the spectrometer 10. The layers can range
in
thickness from 1-20 microns. The passive sensor is prepared by mixing 50 nm
particles
of aluminum oxide in with the polysiloxane layer in an amount of 0.5 to 10 %
by
weight based on the total weight of the polysiloxane layer. During
preparation, the
small particles aggregate to some (currently unknown) degree. Under strain,
some of
the particles in the aggregate separate and the polymer fills in between the
newly
2o separated alumina particles. When the strain is removed, the particles
cannot
reaggregate because of the intervening polymer. This is detected optically
because the
size of the aggregates determines the amount of light scattered off of the
sample: as the
aggregate size changes because of the strain, the amount of light directed
toward the
detector changes since the detector only samples a small volume of space. The
passive
sensor requires no power to achieve its memory effect.
Referring to Fig. 2a, the transmission mode, for an active sensor a capillary
tube 30, e.g. i.d. 0.5 mm; o.d 0.7 mm, is used as a light conduit. Thin films
32, e.g.
polysiloxane/polyimide, are deposited onto the outside walls of the capillary
tube 30
and then these filins are coated with aluminum 34. The aluminum 34 serves as a
3o mirror to keep all the light confined in the tube 30 and to protect the
entire structure
from the surrounding environment. A fiber optic source 3b inputs light in a

CA 02341166 2001-02-19
WO 00/12960 PCTNS99/19601
4
wavelength range of 500 to 1,000 Angstroms into one end of the capillary
tube 30 parallel to the longitudinal axis of the tube and a detector 38
collects the light
at the other end.
In the capillary configuration, the tube 30 acts as both a waveguide and a
sensor. Under no strain, most of the light passes down the tube without
interacting
with the walls. With application of a strain the capillary tube 30 bends, Fig.
2b, so
that a significant amount of light is introduced into the thin film coatings
along the tube
walls. Two effects cause a modulation of the output light intensity. First,
the path
length is changed so any absorption that occurs is increased, depending upon
the
1o absorptivity of the wall materials and the number of bounces the light
undergoes.
Second, the interference effect observed as light passes through the thin film
layers still
is operative, also causing intensity modulation by constructive or destructive
interference, depending on the refractive index and thickness of each layer
and the
wavelength of light used.
The film thicknesses 32 are on the order of 1 to 20 microns, thinner being a
bit
better. The wavelengths of maximum response depends upon the layer
thicknesses, but
that wavelength can be chosen arbitrarily to match the thin film structure.
The
aluminum coating has a thickness of between 400 to 800 nm.
The alternating layers must have a different refractive index and the larger
the
2o difference, the better the sensor response. Polyimide has n = 1.6-1.7
(depending upon
the exact polyimide used, the nature of the curing, and the supplier);
polysiloxane has
n=1.44. Other commonly available transparent polymers polyethylene,
polypropylene, Teflon~, polyvylidene flouride, polyester, etc. have refractive
indices
around 1.4 and could substitute for the polysiloxane layer. High refractive
index
polymers such as polycarbonates have refractive indices approximately the same
as
polyimide.
A preferred sensor system requires both a passive and an active sensor in
close
proximity. The passive sensor measures the maximum strain excursion
experienced
but not a temporal history, i.e. the measured strain may be current or
previous. Thus,
3o the role of the active sensor is to measure the existing strain at the time
of
measurement.

CA 02341166 2001-02-19
WO 00/12960 PCT/(JS99/19601
The sensors can be applied to a structure by currently known bonding
techniques used for the current generation of strain sensors. Because the
sensors are
small, they will measure the strain of the substrate material reliably. The
optical
source and detector need not be embedded with the sensor. With the appropriate
fiber
5 optic connections, the optical measurement can be made periodically by
connecting a
handheld spectrometer to the input and output of the sensor. Thus, for
example, after
an earthquake the maximum strain experienced by each structural element in a
building
could be determined well after the event (days or weeks) to establish the
safety of the
building since the passive sensor retains this information even with (the
likely) loss of
l0 power. Alternatively, a fiber optic network connected to each sensor in a
building that
remotely senses the strain automatically. However, during a catastrophic event
the
fiber network is likely to break and prevent this mode of operation.
The materials used in the sensor are both inexpensive and robust. For example,
the polysiloxane is a commercially available gasket sealer. The capillary
configuration
~s is especially attractive for long term applications because, if necessary,
the entire
sensor can be enclosed. Then, for example, if the sensor is to be used in a
harsh
environment such as a bridge, the entire sensor can be isolated from wind,
rain, salt
spray, etc. because any coatings applied outside of the aluminum layer have no
affect
on the sensor performance.
2o Examples
Examples of the sensor response are given in Figures 3, 4 and 5. The light
source was a tungsten lamp, and strain was applied by four point bending, see
ASTM
C-1341-97.
Figure 3 shows the response of two different active strain sensors, one with
12
25 layers (6 alternating layers of polysiloxane and poiyimide) and one with 26
alternating
layers. Layer thickness was about 10 microns. The absorbance was monitored at
600
nm as a function of applied strain with the results shown. The gage factor is
a function
of the number of layers indicating the interferometric nature of the response.
Further,
the gage factors are large, more than two orders of magnitude larger than
found in
3o typical resistance strain gages. Finally, the response is linear and
reversible over the
entire range up to about 2000 p,strain (this is the typical limit required for
structural

CA 02341166 2001-02-19
WO 00/12960 PGT/US99/19601
6
applications since most materials exceed their plastic deformation limits at
about
2000 pstrain).
Figure 4 shows the response of a passive strain gage having 26 alternating
layers. The layer thickness was about i0 microns. As strain is applied, the
response is
similar to an active gage. The absorbance was monitored at 600 nm. However,
when
the strain is released the response is no longer reversible, i.e., the 0-
strain absorbance
depends upon the history of the sample. This is demonstrated in Figure 4 for
several
different strain excursions. The virgin gage has an absorbance value at 600 nm
of A =
0.73. Application of 300 ,strain changes this to A = 0.83. Upon release of the
stress
~ o back to 0 pstrain the absorbance returns to A = 0.78, shown as the short
dashed line in
Figure 4. Application of any strain less than 300 ,strain follows the dashed
line path
reversibly. However, if the strain exceeds 300 pstrain, then the path reverts
to the
solid line as shown for the 600 pstrain point in Figure 4. Now when the stress
is
released, a new path is taken, shown as the dotted line, and to a new
absorbance at 0
t s pstrain.
The increments between successive strain excursions decreases with increasing
strain (i.e., the passive response is nonlinear) and this is demonstrated in
Figure 5.
The 12 layer gage has a small gage factor but a larger, nearly linear response
range.
The 26 layer gage has a larger gage factor but becomes clearly nonlinear at
2o significantly smaller maximum strains.
The foregoing description has been limited to a specific embodiment of the
invention. It will be apparent, however, that variations and modifications can
be made to
the invention, with the attainment of some or all of the advantages of the
invention.
Therefore, it is the object of the appended claims to cover all such
variations and
25 modifications as come within the true spirit and scope of the invention.
Having described our invention what we now claim is:

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: IPC expired 2022-01-01
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Application Not Reinstated by Deadline 2004-08-25
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 2004-08-25
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 2003-08-25
Letter Sent 2001-10-31
Letter Sent 2001-10-31
Inactive: Single transfer 2001-09-14
Inactive: Cover page published 2001-05-15
Inactive: First IPC assigned 2001-05-13
Inactive: Courtesy letter - Evidence 2001-05-01
Inactive: Acknowledgment of national entry - RFE 2001-04-27
Application Received - PCT 2001-04-20
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 2001-02-19
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 2001-02-19
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 2000-03-09

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2003-08-25

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2002-08-21

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Patent fees are adjusted on the 1st of January every year. The amounts above are the current amounts if received by December 31 of the current year.
Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
Request for examination - standard 2001-02-19
Basic national fee - standard 2001-02-19
MF (application, 2nd anniv.) - standard 02 2001-08-27 2001-05-10
Registration of a document 2001-09-14
MF (application, 3rd anniv.) - standard 03 2002-08-26 2002-08-21
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS FOR HIGHER EDUCATION, STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS
Past Owners on Record
GREGG C. HUSTON
OTTO J. GREGORY
WILLIAM B. EULER
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Representative drawing 2001-05-14 1 4
Description 2001-02-18 6 334
Abstract 2001-02-18 1 47
Drawings 2001-02-18 5 54
Claims 2001-02-18 2 75
Reminder of maintenance fee due 2001-04-25 1 111
Notice of National Entry 2001-04-26 1 202
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2001-10-30 1 113
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2001-10-30 1 113
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Maintenance Fee) 2003-09-21 1 176
Correspondence 2001-04-26 1 26
PCT 2001-02-18 6 260
PCT 2002-03-05 1 41
Fees 2001-05-09 1 24