Language selection

Search

Patent 2347410 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2347410
(54) English Title: SOLUTION POLYMERIZATION PROCESS CATALYZED BY A PHOSPHINIMINE CATALYST
(54) French Title: PROCEDE DE POLYMERISATION EN SOLUTION CATALYSEE PAR UNE PHOSPHINIMINE
Status: Expired
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C08F 210/16 (2006.01)
  • C08F 110/02 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • BROWN, STEPHEN JOHN (Canada)
  • SWABEY, JOHN WILLIAM (Canada)
  • DOBBIN, CHRISTOPHER JOHN BROOKE (Canada)
(73) Owners :
  • NOVA CHEMICALS CORPORATION (Canada)
(71) Applicants :
  • NOVA CHEMICALS CORPORATION (Canada)
(74) Agent: BAAR, CLIFF
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2009-09-08
(22) Filed Date: 2001-05-11
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 2002-11-11
Examination requested: 2006-03-14
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data: None

Abstracts

English Abstract

A solution polymerization process using a phosphinimine catalyst and a boron activator is conducted at a temperature of about 170°C or greater in the presence of trialkyl aluminum to produce polyethylene having a comparatively broad molecular weight distribution. The polyethylene product produced by the process of this invention is desirable because it can provide enhanced "processability" in comparison to polyethylene having a narrow molecular weight distribution. The process of this invention is advantageous in comparison to prior art processes for the preparation of "broad" polyethylene which use two polymerization reactors and/or more than one polymerization catalyst. The polymers produced by the process of this invention are potentially suitable for the preparation of plastic film. For example, a polyethylene according to this invention and having a density of about 0.93 grams per cubic centimeter and a melt index I2 (according to ASTM D 1238) of about 2 may be advantageously used to prepare cast film. In addition the present polyethylenes may be used for the manufacture of a wide variety of other goods including blow molded parts (such as tanks, drums and containers for gasoline or other liquids); extruded goods (such as profiles or hoses); and injection molded goods such as food containers.


French Abstract

Divulgation d'un procédé de polymérisation en solution fonctionnant avec un catalyseur de type phosphinimine et un activateur au bore. Ce procédé est réalisé à une température d'environ 170 degrés C ou plus en présence de trialkylaluminium afin de produire du polyéthylène ayant une distribution de masses moléculaires comparativement étendue. Le polyéthylène produit grâce à ce procédé est souhaitable, car il peut avoir une meilleure aptitude au traitement comparativement à celle de polyéthylènes ayant une distribution de masses moléculaires plus étroites. Ce procédé est avantageux comparativement aux procédés antérieurs pour la préparation de polyéthylène à spectre large, qui fonctionnent avec deux réacteurs de polymérisation et/ou plus d'un catalyseur de polymérisation. Les polymères obtenus grâce au procédé de la présente invention conviennent potentiellement à la préparation de films en matière plastique. Par exemple, un polyéthylène obtenu grâce à la présente invention et ayant une masse volumique d'environ 0,93 gramme par centimètre cube et un indice de fusion I2 (selon la norme ASTM D 1238) d'environ 2 peut être utilisé de manière avantageuse pour la préparation de pellicules moulées. De plus, les présents polyéthylènes peuvent être utilisés pour la production d'une grande variété d'autres biens, y compris des pièces moulées par soufflage (comme des réservoirs, des fûts et des contenants pour l'essence ou d'autres liquides), des pièces extrudées (comme des profilés ou des tuyaux) et des articles moulés par injection comme des contenants alimentaires.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.



The embodiments of the invention in which an exclusive property or
privilege is claimed are defined as follows:

1. A process for preparing thermoplastic ethylene alpha olefin
copolymer having a molecular weight distribution, Mw/Mn, of greater than
2.0, said process comprising polymerizing ethylene and at least one other
C3 to 10 alpha olefin under medium pressure solution polymerization

conditions in a single reactor at a temperature of greater than 170°C
and
less than 300°C in the presence of a catalyst system comprising:

1) an organometallic catalyst comprising a group 4 metal, at
least one phosphinimine ligand and at least one activatable ligand;
2) a four coordinate boron activator; and

3) at least one trialkyl aluminum.

2. The process of claim 1 wherein said catalyst system contains an
alumoxane.

3. The process of claim 1 wherein said temperature is from 180 to
250°C.

4. The process of claim 1 wherein said solution polymerization
conditions are further characterized by a polymerization pressure of from
10,000 to 40,000 kiloPascals.

24


5. The process of claim 1 wherein said at least one C3 to 10 alpha olefin
comprises octene.

6. The process of claim 1 wherein said aluminum alkyl is trimethyl
aluminum.

7. The process of claim 1 wherein said boron activator is a salt of
tetrakis (pentaflurophenyl) boron.

8. The process of claim 6 wherein said boron activator is trityl borate.
9. The process of claim 2 wherein said alumoxane is
methylalumoxane.

10. The process of claim 1 wherein said phosphinimine catalyst is
defined by the formula:

(Cp)aM(PI)b(L)c
wherein PI is a phosphinimine ligand; Cp is a cyclopentadienyl-type; L is
an activatable ligand; M is a metal selected from Ti, Hf and Zr; and
wherein a is 0 or 1; b is 1 or 2; a + b = 2; c is 1 or 2; and a + b + c = the
valence of the metal M.


Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.



CA 02347410 2008-11-14

SOLUTION POLYMERIZATION PROCESS CATALYZED BY A
PHOSPHINIMINE CATALYST

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to a process for the preparation of
polyethylene having a broad molecular weight distribution.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

It is well known that linear polyethylene may be prepared by the
polymerization of ethylene (optionally with one or more olefins or diolefins
such as butene, hexene, octene or hexadiene) using a"Ziegler" catalyst

system which comprises a transition metal compound (such as a titanium
halide) or a vanadium halide and an aluminum alkyl. Polyethylene
produced in this manner, particularly "linear low density polyethylene", is in
widespread commercial use. However, the conventional linear low density
polyethylene ("Ildpe") made with Ziegler catalysts suffers from a number of

deficiencies. Most notably, conventional Ildpe is a heterogeneous product
which contains a small fraction of low molecular weight wax and a
comparatively large amount of very high molecular weight homopolymer.
The heterogeneous nature of these polymers generally detracts from the
physical properties of finished goods made from them.

Accordingly, a great deal of effort has been directed towards the
preparation of "homogeneous" Ildpe resins which mitigate this problem. In
particular, it is now well known to those skilled in the art that so-called
"metallocene" catalysts may be used to produce homogeneous Ildpe resin.
These homogeneous resins are, however, not without problems. Most

notably, these homogeneous resins typically have a narrow molecular
1
M:\Swtt1SCRespwnseX9211 canRDiadosirePages.doc


CA 02347410 2008-11-14

weight distribution and are difficult to "process" or convert into finished
polyethylene products. Thus, efforts to improve the processability of
homogeneous polyethylene resin by broadening the molecular weight
distribution are disclosed in the art.

One approach which has been used to achieve this object is the
use of mixed catalyst systems in a single reactor. For example, United
States Patent (USP) 4,530,914 (Ewen et al., to Exxon) teach the

preparation of "broad" polymers through the use of two different
metallocene catalysts and USP 4,701,432 (Welborn, to Exxon) teaches

the use of a supported catalyst prepared with a metallocene catalyst and a
Ziegler Natta catalyst. Many others have subsequently attempted to use
similar mixed catalyst systems, as described in USP 5,767,031; 5,594,078;
5,648,428; 4,659,685; 5,145,818; 5,395,810; and 5,614,456.

However, the use of "mixed" catalyst systems is generally
associated with operability problems. For example, the use of two
catalysts on a single support (as taught by Welborn in USP 4,701,432)
may be associated with a reduced degree of process control flexibility (e.g.
if the polymerization reaction is not proceeding as desired when using
such a catalyst system, then it is difficult to establish which corrective

action should be taken because the corrective action will typically have a
different effect on each of the two different catalyst components).
Moreover, the two different catalyst/cocatalyst systems may interfere with
one another - for example, the organoaluminum component which is often
used in Ziegler Natta or chromium catalyst systems may "poison" a

metallocene catalyst.

2
M:1ScottlSCResponse19211 canRDisalosurePages.doc


CA 02347410 2008-11-14

Another alternative is to use two different homogeneous catalysts in
two different polymerization reactors. In commonly assigned USP
6,063,879 (Stephan et al.) there are disclosed certain phosphinimine
catalysts which may be used to produce homogeneous polyethylene. The

use of such phosphinimine catalysts in a "dual reactor" polymerization
system to prepare polymers having a broad molecular weight distribution
is also disclosed in a commonly assigned patent application (Canadian
application 2,245,375).

Each of the approaches to produce broad MWD polymers requires
the use of at least two distinct polymerization catalysts or two distinct
polymerization reactors.

We have now discovered a process to prepare broad MWD
ethylene polymers in a single polymerization reactor using a single
phosphinimine catalyst and a specific activation system.

The present process is simpler/more elegant than the above
described prior art process in the sense that the present process does not
require the use of two catalysts and/or two reactors. The simplicity of the
present process offers the potential to improve process control and reduce
costs in comparison to the prior art processes.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
A process for preparing thermoplastic ethylene alpha olefin
copolymer having a polydispersity (or molecular weight distribution,
Mw/Mn) of greater than 2, said process comprising polymerizing ethylene
and at least one other C3 to lo alpha olefin under medium pressure solution

3
M:\Scori\SCResponse\9211 canRDisclosurePages. doc


CA 02347410 2008-11-14

polymerization conditions at a temperature of greater than 170 C to 300 C
in the presence of a catalyst system comprising:

1) an organometallic catalyst comprising a group 4 metal, at
least one phosphinimine ligand and at least one activatable ligand;

2) a four coordinate boron activator; and
3) at least one trialkyl aluminum.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION

1. Phosphinimine Catalyst

The catalyst used in this invention is an organometallic complex of
a group 4 metal having at least one phosphinimine ligand and at least one
activatable ligand. Highly preferred catalysts also contain a
cyclopentadienyl ligand.

The preferred phosphinimine catalysts used in this invention are
defined by the formula:

(CP)aM(PI)b(L)c

wherein PI is a phosphinimine ligand (see section 1.1 below); Cp is a
cyclopentadienyl-type ligand (section 1.2 below); L is an activatable ligand
(section 1.3 below); M is a metal selected from Ti, Hf and Zr; and

wherein a is 0or 1; b is 1 or2; a+b=2; c is 1 or2; and a+b+c=the
valence of the metal M.

The most preferred catalysts are those in which the metal is 4
valent. For example, a catalyst may be a cyclopentadienyl-phosphinimine
complex of titanium, zirconium, or hafnium having two additional,
monoanionic ligands. It is particularly preferred that each catalyst contains

4
M:\ScottlSCResponse\9211 canRDisdosurePages.doc


CA 02347410 2008-11-14

one phosphinimine ligand, one cyclopentadienyl ligand and two chloride or
alkyl ligands.

1.1 Phosphinimine Ligand

Each catalyst must contain at least one phosphinimine ligand which
is covalently bonded to the metal. Phosphinimine ligands are defined by
the formula:

R'
\
R'-P=N-
/
R'
wherein each R' is independently selected from the group consisting of a
hydrogen atom, a halogen atom, C1_20 hydrocarbyl radicals which are
unsubstituted by or further substituted by a halogen atom, a C1.8 alkoxy
radical, a Cr
,10 aryl or aryloxy radical, an amido radical, a silyl radical of the
formula:

-Si-(R2)3
wherein each R2 is independently selected from the group consisting of
hydrogen, a CI-8 alkyl or alkoxy radical, Cs.1o aryl or aryloxy radicals, and
a
germanyl radical of the formula:

Ge-(R2)3
wherein R 2 is as defined above.

The preferred phosphinimines are those in which each R' is a
hydrocarbyl radical. A particularly preferred phosphinimine is tri-(tertiary
butyl) phosphinimine (i.e. where each R' is a tertiary butyl group).

5
M:1Scott=ResponseW11 canRDisGosurePages.doc


CA 02347410 2008-11-14

1.2 Cyclopentadienyl Ligands

As used herein, the term cyclopentadienyl-type ligand is meant to
convey its conventional meaning, namely a ligand having a five carbon
ring which is bonded to the metal via eta-5 bonding. Thus, the term

"cyclopentadienyl-type" includes unsubstituted cyclopentadienyl,
substituted cyclopentadienyl, unsubstituted indenyl, substituted indenyl,
unsubstituted fluorenyl and substituted fluorenyl. An exemplary list of
substituents for a cyclopentadienyl ligand includes the group consisting of
C,_,o hydrocarbyl radical (which hydrocarbyl substituents are unsubstituted

or further substituted); a halogen atom, C1_8 alkoxy radical, a C&Io aryl or
aryloxy radical; an amido radical which is unsubstituted or substituted by
up to two C1_8 alkyl radicals; a phosphido radical which is unsubstituted or
substituted by up to two C1_8 alkyl radicals; silyl radicals of the formula
-Si-(R)3 wherein each R is independently selected from the group

consisting of hydrogen, a Cl$ alkyl or alkoxy radical Cs_lo aryl or aryloxy
radicals; germanyl radicals of the formula Ge-(R)3 wherein R is as defined
directly above.

1.3 Activatable Ligand

The term "activatable ligand" refers to a ligand which may be

activated by a cocatalyst, (or "activator"), to facilitate olefin
polymerization.
Exemplary activatable ligands are independently selected from the group
consisting of a hydrogen atom, a halogen atom, a Cl_lo hydrocarbyl
radical, a C,_,o alkoxy radical, a C5_,o aryl oxide radical; each of which
said
hydrocarbyl, alkoxy, and aryl oxide radicals may be unsubstituted by or

further substituted by a halogen atom, a C1.8 alkyl radical, a CI_a alkoxy
6
M:%Scott\SCResponse\9211 canRDisGosurePeges.doc


CA 02347410 2008-11-14

radical, a C6_10 aryl or aryloxy radical, an amido radical which is
unsubstituted or substituted by up to two C1_8 alkyl radicals; a phosphido
radical which is unsubstituted or substituted by up to two C1_8 alkyl
radicals.

The number of activatable ligands depends upon the valency of the
metal and the valency of the activatable ligand. The catalyst metals are
group 4 metals, preferably in their highest oxidation state (i.e. 4+) and the
preferred activatable ligands are monoanionic (such as a halide -
especially chloride or an alkyl - especially methyl). Thus, the preferred

catalyst contains a phosphinimine ligand, a cyclopentadienyl ligand and
two chloride (or methyl) ligands bonded to the group 4 metal. In some
instances, the metal of the catalyst component may not be in the highest
oxidation state. For example, a titanium (III) component would contain
only one activatable ligand. Also, it is permitted to use a dianionic

activatable ligand (such as a butadienyl ligand) although this is not
preferred.

2. Boron Activator

The catalyst component described in part 1 above is used in
combination with a boron activator to form an active catalyst system for
olefin polymerization as described in more detail below.

So-called boron activators (also known as "ionic activators" are well
known for use with metallocene catalysts. See, for example, USP
5,198,401 (Hlatky and Turner) and USP 5,132,380 (Stevens and
Neithamer).

7
M:1Scott\SCResponse19211 canRDisclosurePages.doc


CA 02347410 2008-11-14

Whilst not wishing to be bound by any theory, it is thought by many
of those skilled in the art that boron activators initially cause the
abstraction of one or more of the activatable ligands in a manner which
ionizes the catalyst into a cation, then provides a bulky, labile, non-

coordinating anion which stabilizes the catalyst in a cationic form. The
resulting bulky, non-coordinating anion permits olefin polymerization to
proceed at the cationic catalyst center (presumably because the non-
coordinating anion is sufficiently labile to be displaced by monomer which
coordinates to the catalyst. It should be expressly noted that the boron

activator/phosphinimine catalyst may also form a non-ionic coordination
complex which is catalytically active for olefin polymerization. The boron
activator is described as being four coordinate - i.e. there must be four
ligands bonded to the boron atom. Preferred boron activators are
described in (i) - (ii) below:

(i) compounds of the formula [R5]+ [B(R')4]" wherein B is a
boron atom, R5 is a aromatic hydrocarbyl (e.g. triphenyl
methyl cation) and each R' is independently selected from
the group consisting of phenyl radicals which are
unsubstituted or substituted with from 3 to 5 substituents

selected from the group consisting of a fluorine atom, a Cl-4
alkyl or alkoxy radical which is unsubstituted or substituted
by a fluorine atom; and a silyl radical of the formula
-Si-(R9)3; wherein each R9 is independently selected from
the group consisting of a hydrogen atom and a C1_4alkyl

radical; and

8
M:\ScottlSCResponse\9211 canRDlsclosurePages. doo


CA 02347410 2008-11-14

(ii) compounds of the formula [(R8)t ZH]+[B(R')4]- wherein B is a
boron atom, H is a hydrogen atom, Z is a nitrogen atom or
phosphorus atom, t is 2 or 3 and R8 is selected from the
group consisting of C1_8 alkyl radicals, a phenyl radical which

is unsubstituted or substituted by up to three Cl-4 alkyl
radicals, or one R8 taken together with the nitrogen atom
may form an anilinium radical and R' is as defined above.

In the above compounds preferably R' is a pentafluorophenyl
radical. In general, preferred boron activators may be described as salts
of tetra(perfluorophenyl) boron. More specifically, the preferred activators

are anilinium, carbonium, oxonium, phosphonium and sulfonium salts of
tetra(perfluorophenyl) boron, with anilinium and trityl (or "triphenyl
methylium") salts being especially preferred.

It should also be noted that three coordinate boron activators (i.e.
compounds of the formula B(R')3 where R' is as defined above) are not
suitable for use in the process of this invention. This is surprising as such
compounds are well known as activators for metallocene catalysts.
However, for reasons which are not completely understood, the use of a
trivalent boron activator is not suitable for preparing polymers having a

broad molecular distribution in accordance with the process of this
invention.

Exemplary ionic activators include:
triethylammonium tetra(phenyl)boron,
tripropylammonium tetra(phenyl)boron,

tri(n-butyl)ammonium tetra(phenyl)boron,
9
M: \Scott\SC Response19211 can RDisdosurePages. doc


CA 02347410 2008-11-14

trimethylammonium tetra(p-tolyl)boron,
trimethylammonium tetra(o-tolyl)boron,
tributylammonium tetra(pentafluorophenyl)boron,
tripropylammonium tetra(o,p-dimethylphenyl)boron,

tributylammonium tetra(m,m-dimethylphenyl)boron,
tributylammonium tetra(p-trifluoromethylphenyl)boron,
tributylammonium tetra(pentafluorophenyl)boron,
tri(n-butyl)ammonium tetra(o-tolyl)boron,
N,N-dimethylanilinium tetra(phenyl)boron,

N,N-diethylanilinium tetra(phenyl)boron,
N,N-diethylanilinium tetra(phenyl)n-butylboron,
N,N-2,4,6-pentamethylanilinium tetra(phenyl)boron,
di-(isopropyl)ammonium tetra(pentafluorophenyl)boron,
dicyclohexylammonium tetra(phenyl)boron,

triphenylphosphonium tetra(phenyl)boron,
tri(methylphenyl)phosphonium tetra(phenyl)boron,
tri(dimethylphenyl)phosphonium tetra(phenyl)boron,
tropillium tetrakispentafluorophenyl borate,
triphenylmethylium tetrakispentafluorophenyl borate,

benzene (diazonium) tetrakispentafluorophenyl borate,
tropillium tetrakis (2,3,5,6-tetrafluorophenyl) borate,
triphenylmethylium tetrakis (2,3,5,6-tetrafluorophenyl) borate,
benzene (diazonium) tetrakis (3,4,5-trifluorophenyl) borate,
tropillium tetrakis (3,4,5-trifluorophenyl) borate,

benzene (diazonium) tetrakis (3,4,5-trifluorophenyl) borate,
M:1ScottlSCResponae19211 cenRDisdosurePages, cbc


CA 02347410 2008-11-14

tropillium tetrakis (1,2,2-trifluoroethenyl) borate,
triphenyimethylium tetrakis (1,2,2-trifluoroethenyl) borate,
benzene (diazonium) tetrakis (1,2,2-trifluoroethenyl) borate,
tropillium tetrakis (2,3,4,5-tetrafluorophenyl) borate,

triphenylmethylium tetrakis (2,3,4,5-tetrafluorophenyl) borate, and
benzene (diazonium) tetrakis (2,3,4,5-tetrafluorophenyl) borate.

Readily commercially available ionic activators which are suitable
for the process of this invention are:

N,N- dimethylaniliniumtetrakispentafluorophenyi borate, and

triphenylmethylium tetrakispentafluorophenyl borate (also known as rrtrityl
borate").

It is preferred to use the boron activator in an equimolar amount
with respect to the transition metal of the catalyst (i.e. boron/titanium
ratio
of 1/1, when the catalyst is an organotitanium complex) through mole

ratios of from 0.3/1 to 10.0/1 may be used.
2.1 Aluminum Alkyls

The use of a trialkyl aluminum alkyl is essential to the process of
this invention. Preferred amounts are from 1:1 to 100:1 (on a molar basis,
with reference to the group 4 metal contained in the phosphinimine

catalyst).

Preferred aluminum alkyls are trimethyl aluminum, triethyl
aluminum, tri isobutyl aluminum and tri n-butyl aluminum. Mixed aluminum
alkyls (i.e. where different alkyl ligands are bonded to the aluminum)
and/or mixtures of aluminum alkyls may also be used. However, the

aluminum compound must be a trialkyl aluminum. Most notably, for
11
M:1ScottlSCResponse19211 canRDisclosurePages. doc


CA 02347410 2008-11-14

reasons which are not completely understood, the use of an aluminum
alkyl/alkoxide (i.e. an organoaluminum having an alkyl ligand and an
alkoxy ligand) is not suitable because it does not always lend to polymers
having a broadened molecular weight distribution (as is illustrated in the
Examples).

2.2 Alumoxanes

The use of alumoxane (also known as aluminoxane) is optional.
The alumoxane may be of the formula:

(R4)2AIO(R4AIO)mAI(R4)2
wherein each R4 is independently selected from the group consisting of
C1_20 hydrocarbyl radicals and m is from 0 to 50, preferably R4 is a Cl.4
alkyl radical and m is from 5 to 30. Methylalumoxane (or "MAO") in which
each R is methyl is the preferred alumoxane.

Alumoxanes are well known as cocatalysts, particularly for

metallocene-type catalysts. Alumoxanes are also readily available articles
of commerce.

The use of an alumoxane cocatalyst generally requires a molar ratio
of aluminum to the transition metal in the catalyst from 20:1 to 1000:1.
Preferred ratios are from 50:1 to 250:1.

Many commercially available alumoxanes are known to contain
trialkyl aluminum. Thus, such alumoxanes may be the source of the
trialkyl aluminum which is essential to the process of this invention. This is
described in more detail in the Examples.

12
M:kScottflSC Reeponsa~.9211 canRDiscbsurePages.doc


CA 02347410 2008-11-14

3. Description of Solution Polymerization Process

Solution processes for the (co)polymerization of ethylene are well
known in the art. These processes are conducted in the presence of an
inert hydrocarbon solvent typically a C5_12 hydrocarbon which may be

unsubstituted or substituted by a C1-4alkyl group, such as pentane, methyl
pentane, hexane, heptane, octane, cyclohexane, methylcyclohexane and
hydrogenated naphtha. An example of a suitable solvent which is
commercially available is "Isopar E" (C8-12 aliphatic solvent, Exxon
Chemical Co.).

The polymerization temperature in a conventional solution process
is from about 80 C to about 300 C (preferably from about 120 C to
250 C). However, as is illustrated in the Examples, the polymerization
temperature for the process of this invention must be greater than about
160 C (because at lower polymerization temperature, the resulting

polymers generally do not exhibit the broad molecular weight distribution
which is a desirable feature of this invention). The upper temperature limit
will be influenced by considerations which are well known to those skilled
in the art, such as a desire to maximize operating temperature (so as to
reduce solution viscosity). While still maintaining good polymer properties

(as increased polymerization temperatures generally reduce the molecular
weight of the polymer). In general, the upper polymerization temperature
will preferably be between 200 and 300 C (especially 220 to 250 C). The
most preferred reaction process is a "medium pressure process", meaning
that the pressure in the reactor is preferably less than about 6,000 psi

(about 42,000 kiloPascals or kPa). Preferred pressures are from 10,000 to
13
M:\ScottlSCResponse19211 canRDisdosurePages.doc


CA 02347410 2008-11-14

40,000 kPa, most preferably from about 2,000 psi to 3,000 psi (about
14,000 - 22,000 kPa).

Suitable monomers for copolymerization with ethylene include C3_20
mono- and di-olefins. Preferred comonomers include C3_12 alpha olefins

which are unsubstituted or substituted by up to two C1_6 alkyl radicals, C8-12
vinyl aromatic monomers which are unsubstituted or substituted by up to
two substituents selected from the group consisting of C1-4 alkyl radicals,
C4_12 straight chained or cyclic diolefins which are unsubstituted or

substituted by a C1-4 alkyl radical. Illustrative non-limiting examples of
such alpha-olefins are one or more of propylene, 1-butene, 1-pentene,
1-hexene, 1-octene and 1-decene, styrene, alpha methyl styrene, and the
constrained-ring cyclic olefins such as cyclobutene, cyclopentene,
dicyclopentadiene norbomene, alkyl-substituted norbornes, alkenyl-
substituted norbornes and the like (e.g. 5-methylene-2-norbornene and 5-

ethylidene-2-norbornene, bicyclo-(2,2,1)-hepta-2,5-diene).

The polyethylene polymers which may be prepared in accordance
with the present invention are LLDPE's which typically comprise not less
than 60, preferably not less than 75 weight % of ethylene and the balance
one or more C4_10 alpha olefins, preferably selected from the group

consisting of 1-butene, 1-hexene and 1-octene. The polyethylene
prepared in accordance with the present invention may be LLDPE having
a density from about 0.910 to 0.935 g/cc or (linear) high density
polyethylene having a density above 0.935 g/cc. The present invention
might also be useful to prepare polyethylene having a density below 0.910

g/cc - the so-called very low and ultra low density polyethylenes.
14
M:1ScothSCResponse\9211 canRDisdosurePages.doc


CA 02347410 2008-11-14

Generally the alpha olefin may be present in an amount from about
3 to 30 weight %, preferably from about 4 to 25 weight %.

The present invention may also be used to prepare co- and ter-
polymers of ethylene, propylene and optionally one or more diene

monomers. Generally, such polymers will contain about 50 to about 75
weight % ethylene, preferably about 50 to 60 weight % ethylene and
correspondingly from 50 to 25 weight % of propylene. A portion of the
monomers, typically the propylene monomer, may be replaced by a
conjugated diolefin. The diolefin may be present in amounts up to 10

weight % of the polymer although typically is present in amounts from
about 3 to 5 weight %. The resulting polymer may have a composition
comprising from 40 to 75 weight % of ethylene, from 50 to 15 weight % of
propylene and up to 10 weight % of a diene monomer to provide 100
weight % of the polymer. Preferred but not limiting examples of the dienes

are dicyclopentadiene, 1,4-hexadiene, 5-methylene-2-norbornene, 5-
ethylidene-2-norbornene and 5-vinyl-2-norbornene, especially 5-
ethylidene-2-norbornene and 1,4-hexadiene.

The monomers are dissolved/dispersed in the solvent either prior to
being fed to the reactor (or for gaseous monomers the monomer may be
fed to the reactor so that it will dissolve in the reaction mixture). Prior to
mixing, the solvent and monomers are generally purified to remove

potential catalyst poisons such as water, oxygen or metal impurities. The
feedstock purification follows standard practices in the art, e.g. molecular
sieves, alumina beds and oxygen removal catalysts are used for the

M:\Scott\SC Response\9211 canRDisclosurePages. doc


CA 02347410 2008-11-14

purification of monomers. The solvent itself as well (e.g. methyl pentane,
cyclohexane, hexane or toluene) is preferably treated in a similar manner.
The feedstock may be heated or cooled prior to feeding to the
reactor.

Generally, the catalyst components may be premixed in the solvent
for the reaction or fed as separate streams to the reactor. In some
instances premixing it may be desirable to provide a reaction time for the
catalyst components prior to entering the reaction. Such an "in line
mixing" technique is described in a number of patents in the name of

DuPont Canada Inc (e.g. USP 5,589,555 issued December 31, 1996).
EXAMPLES
Continuous Solution Polymerization

All the polymerization experiments described below were conducted
on a continuous solution polymerization reactor. The process is

continuous in all feed streams (solvent, monomers and catalyst) and in the
removal of product. All feed streams were purified prior to the reactor by
contact with various absorption media to remove catalyst killing impurities
such as water, oxygen and polar materials as is known to those skilled in
the art. All components were stored and manipulated under an

atmosphere of purified nitrogen.

All the examples below were conducted in a reactor of 71.5 cc
internal volume. In each experiment the volumetric feed to the reactor was
kept constant and as a consequence so was the reactor residence time.

The catalyst solutions were pumped to the reactor independently
and there was no pre-contact between the activator and the catalyst.

16
M:1ScottlSCResponse\9211 canRDisclosurePages.doc


CA 02347410 2008-11-14

Because of the low solubility of the catalysts, activators and
methylalumoxane (MAO) in cyclohexane, solutions were prepared in
purified xylene. The catalyst precursor used in all experiments was
cyclopentadienyl titanium (triteriary butyl phosphinimine) dichloride (or

"CpTiNP(tBu3)CI2'). If MAO was used in the experiments, the catalyst was
added directly in the precursor form - (i.e. as CpTiNP(tBu3)CI2). In the
absence of MAO, the catalyst precursor was alkylated (using a Grignard
reagent such as methyl magnesium bromide so as to form
cyclopentadienyl titanium (tritertiary butyl phosphinimine) dimethyl - or

"CpTiNP(tBu3)Me2" prior to adding it to the polymerization reactor). The
catalyst was activated with the ionic activator, in situ (in the
polymerization
reactor) at the reaction temperature in the presence of the monomers.
The activator used in the examples was trityl borate (unless otherwise
indicated). Catalyst and activator concentrations in the polymerization

reactor are shown in the Table (micromolar concentrations). The
polymerizations were carried out in cyclohexane at a pressure of 1500
pounds per square inch (psi). Ethylene was supplied to the reactor by a
calibrated thermal mass flow meter and was dissolved in the reaction
solvent prior to the polymerization reactor. If comonomer (for example 1-

octene) was used it was also premixed with the ethylene before entering
the polymerization reactor copolymerizations are indicated by the "Ca"
entry in Table 1(where C8 represents octene and C2 represents ethylene).
Under these conditions the ethylene conversion is a dependent variable
controlled by the catalyst concentration, reaction temperature and catalyst
activity, etc.

17
M:1ScotthSCResponse19211 canRDisGosurePages.doc


CA 02347410 2008-11-14

The internal reactor temperature is monitored by a thermocouple in
the polymerization medium and can be controlled at the required set point
to +/- 0.5 C. Downstream of the reactor the pressure was reduced from
the reaction pressure (1500 psi) to atmospheric. The solid polymer was

then recovered as a slurry in the condensed solvent and was dried by
evaporation before analysis.

The ethylene conversion was determined by a dedicated on-line
gas chromatograph by reference to propane which was used as an
internal standard.

Molecular weight distributions (Mw/Mn) were determined by gel
permeation chromotography ("GPC") using a commercially available
chromatograph ("Waters 150").

Example 1 - Comparative

The comparative experiments of this example show that

polymerizations with a phosphinimine catalyst at a temperature of 180 C
do not produce a broad molecular weight distribution in the absence of
trialkyl aluminum (see entry 1- Mw/Mn = 1.8).

Example 2 - Inventive

This experiment illustrates that a polymerization temperature of

200 C with a phosphinimine catalyst in the presence of trimethyl aluminum
provides polyethylene having a desirable molecular weight distribution
(mole ratio 10/1, based on the titanium).

Example 3 - Comparative

The comparative experiments of this example are similar to those of
example 1 except the polymerization temperature was increased to 200 C.
18
M:\Scott\SCResponse\9211 canRDisclosurePages.doc


CA 02347410 2008-11-14

These experiments show that high temperature alone (in the absence of
aluminum alkyl) is not always sufficient to provide a "broad" MWD polymer.
Example 4 - Comparative

Only three of the four necessary conditions for the process of the
present invention were employed in the experiments of this example -
(namely, 1) the use of the phosphinimine catalyst; 2) the use of boron
activator having four ligands; and 3) the presence of free aluminum alkyl).
MAO was added to the polymerizations of this example. The MAO
contained about 20 mole % free trimethyl aluminum (TMA), based on the

total aluminum content of the MAO. The Al/Ti ratios shown in Table 1 are
based on the TMA (not total MAO). However, the fourth necessary
condition (i.e. a polymerization temperature of 170 C or greater) was not
used - and the polymers produced in these comparative examples have a
narrow molecular weight distribution.

Example 5 - Comparative

A magnesium alkyl (butyl ethyl magnesium) was added instead of
magnesium alkyl (Mg/Ti ratio of 1.5/1). This Mw/Mn result shows that a
magnesium alkyl did not broaden the molecular weight dist(bution of
polyethylene produced at 180 C.

Example 6 - Comparative

This comparative example used only three of the necessary
conditions for the process of the present invention (namely, 1) the use of
the phosphinimine catalyst; 2) the use of an appropriate boron activator;
and 3) a polymerization temperature of 170 C or greater). However, the

four necessary conditions were not satisfied (because a dialkyl aluminum
19
M:%.SnotllSC Response19211 oenRDi sdosurePapes.doc

, . . .., _.,,.õ,...,a.,...,.
CA 02347410 2008-11-14

alkoxide, namely di-isobutyl aluminum (2,6,-ditertiary butyl phenoxide) was
employed instead of a trialkyl aluminum. The Al/Ti ratios used in the
experiments of this example are noted in Table 1.

Example 7 - Inventive

The inventive experiments of this example illustrate the production
of polyethylene having a desirable (broad) molecular weight distribution at
a polymerization temperature of 200 C. MAO was added to these
polymerizations. The MAO contained about 20 mole % trimethyl
aluminum (TMA) based on the total aluminum in the MAO. The Al/Ti

molar ratio shown in Table 1 includes only the trimethyl aluminum (it does
not include the aluminum in the oligomeric MAO).

Example 8 - Inventive

This inventive example is similar to example 7 except the
polymerization temperature was lowered to 180 C. (Again, MAO

containing about 20 mole % TMA was included in these polymerizations
and the AVTi ratio reflects the amount of TMA.)

Example 9 - Inventive

The aluminum alkyl which is required for the process of this
invention was tri-isobutyl aluminum (instead of the trimethyl aluminum of
examples 7/8).

Example 10 - Inventive

Anilinium borate [Ph3Me2NH]+[B(CsF5)4]- was used as the activator in
this example instead of the trityl borate used in the previous examples.

M: \Scotl\SCResponse\9211 cenR DisdosurePagea. doc


CA 02347410 2008-11-14
ExamQle 11 - Comparative

This comparative example is similar to inventive example 7 except
that (a bulky alcohol (namely, 2,4 di tertiary butyl phenol) was added to the
aluminoxane at a mole ratio of 4/1 (based on the molar concentration of

the aluminum in the aluminoxane). Whilst not wishing to be bound by
theory, it is postulated that the bulky alcohol reacts with the trimethyl
aluminum contained in the aluminoxane). The polymerization reaction
was very active but the polymers produced in these comparative
experiments have a narrow molecular weight distribution.

Example 12 - Inventive

This inventive example is similar to inventive example 7 except that
the polymerization temperature of this inventive example was 180 C
(instead of 200 C for comparative example 4). MAO containing 20 mole %
TMA was added to these polymerizations. The Al/Ti ratios reflect the TMA
concentration.

21
M:1Saott\8CResponse19211 canRDisGosurePages. doc


CA 02347410 2008-11-14
._-
O
E O O r O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
Q O O O O O p O O O O O N~ O OIT 04 00 N~~ OQ ~~A ~ ~A tn ~ ~
E
...
C
o0G00)O(flC0oD000001~00000e-C~N~MOI~<DO)Mr
rr~NM(V NNNv'6
11
N
V OOOOMMNrO0O00~A~~AOMMMMrM~OMM
0000 (flCUd'NOOU~ OR OOCflC000(00(D Nf- N01- 1~
O O O O O O O O O O~~ O O O O O O O O O r O O O O O
V

CL^ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
E C~ QO co 00 CO O O O O O O(O (D 00 O O O O O O O O OD 00 00 CO O OD
~ ~ r r r N N N N N N~- r ~ N N N N (N N N N r r r r r ~
C
0
.=- (V 1--~1, GO (o Gov OMLf)G)d)I-- Nd)a)h v 0)tflONLo 001- c0
M=d ttNON CM rOCcV 1: oi vm: CO~ll-r'00ai L6 06 f-~ Q)ai 0) D)Il: GO
C C O O~ O C~ 00 On O~ m O Q~ 00 O) O O O O c0 0o O 00 00 0~ 00 0o 00 Co 00
O o

c
w o
m C V LAtfltD (D 01~ VrrrCO(O0G00D 00MO00tOAtOA~(O(fl(flCflOtf)
> t[)r~r V Q)OOMtf) f, 1, 1, w N N N N o tn
o ~ jCMMMMNOe-~NCV cV 4 M ~~~OiOiQia)NCV N
H ~ Q v

m a
l1)~O(fl~C ~I~~rrr(O~DOOOOOOOM~~~~(~(~(~CflLn~
0
` ~(?rrr ~OOOMrr 1 ~ 1 - 1~(fl NNNNtnll)
~ = =-~~~ MCr1 chCMcMNC'j NNNIt M ~~~G)rnOOifVN
N N N N N N N N N~õ/ N N N N N
N y Q) y cv Q) () y 0 4) lh fo N-v N-N 0 4) 0 QI 0 N N N N-M
~ f+) M f) ^^ M l+) l+) c+) l+) m m f+) {h Q+) l+) C+i M l+) CM f+) l+) M tn
C) cn tM
mmmmmmmmmmaammmmmmmmmmmmmmm
~ +. r+ a. ~ v y + ~+ + ~ + ++ 11 11 +++ r.= y.+ ~-. ~ = ~-+ r w+ w+ ++ ~+ ~+
w+ r.+
~ n.aaaaa.an.a.n.zzaaaaaaaaaaaaa.aa.
zzzzzzzzzz~-,P-zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
~v~vvv~c~c~c~0 vc~c~c~c~c~v~c~c~t~c~vc~vc~ ~

N ~! tO1- 00Q>OrNMd IAtO1~00Q~OrNM~1licCl~= m
r r r r r r r r r r N N N N N N N N

c
?
r N M V 4! 0 f%. 00
d d O O d d O d rn
a - a a - a a a ~
E E E E E E E E

W W W W W W W W
8
N


CA 02347410 2008-11-14
OLn N O OLo O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O u o O
00 ~0 N f~ 00 00 o0 GO CO GO 00 00 CO 00 CO 00 CO o0 00 OO cV i
M(fl O N O O O(G ( O f - O r O O O O O 'V O 1~ 00 N 6 6 . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . .

O O O O O O O r e- O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
00 00 O O O O O 00 0~ GO OO 00 00 00 GO CO o~ OD 00 0~ 00 CO OD 00
~ r N N N N N r r r ~ r r r ~ r r r r r r r r r
O~ 0~ O tt e- tfl I~ M O O 1~ G~ tn tn d' N(fl ~~G N M ~F ~ O
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
h O CO I` 00 00 O r- r r r O O O M O f~ M r O Cfl ~ GO O)
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
tp v 0 OD 00 r r Lp lo lA M O CO 0 (fl W 0 0
wMF- f- MM00CO00Mm I, d)M0)03Id)00OD M
N~'~~NNNNNNre-r00CMNO(CMNNrr- C N
N
>+
.r

LO M~~~~ N r r N N M M M~ f r r( p O r 0 p M 0 0
tA~G .f, MMM001AtntAOMCM04 CMMVr0000 NC) C)N,-fV CV Nr tbMN00~AC'M(~INe-e- cc

::.
N
C
N N
~ N Q) CQ~ N_N =N1~=1 N N N N N N (V N N N N N N N N N~
U V~ L V V ~ ~ V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V O
O
m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m
=+ ++ ~+ .~+ ~+ y.+ w+ ++ z zh+ ++ r.+ ~+ t+ y.+ ar t+ t+ ~ zt+ r.+ =
aaa.aaan.a(La.a.aaaaaaaaaLL aaa -
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzcu
~i=i=f=~
.v_)
a)
aa
OO~ONt+MRe 4l40 I~OOO~O~NM 1nlp1- CO~fO~-
NMeMMMMeMMe'MMetRe eFef ~~V Re~1D4!
O n- N
01 V, n- %-
m m d m
E E E E $
Z
x W W W

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 2347410 was not found.

Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date 2009-09-08
(22) Filed 2001-05-11
(41) Open to Public Inspection 2002-11-11
Examination Requested 2006-03-14
(45) Issued 2009-09-08
Expired 2021-05-11

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 2001-05-11
Application Fee $300.00 2001-05-11
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 2 2003-05-12 $100.00 2003-01-27
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 3 2004-05-11 $100.00 2004-02-26
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 4 2005-05-11 $100.00 2005-03-07
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 5 2006-05-11 $200.00 2006-02-28
Request for Examination $800.00 2006-03-14
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 6 2007-05-11 $200.00 2007-02-27
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 7 2008-05-12 $200.00 2008-03-04
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 8 2009-05-11 $200.00 2009-03-13
Final Fee $300.00 2009-06-23
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 9 2010-05-11 $200.00 2010-03-12
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 10 2011-05-11 $250.00 2011-03-11
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 11 2012-05-11 $250.00 2012-03-13
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 12 2013-05-13 $250.00 2013-03-15
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 13 2014-05-12 $250.00 2014-03-13
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 14 2015-05-11 $250.00 2015-03-10
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 15 2016-05-11 $450.00 2016-03-08
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 16 2017-05-11 $450.00 2017-03-14
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 17 2018-05-11 $450.00 2018-03-15
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 18 2019-05-13 $450.00 2019-03-14
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 19 2020-05-11 $450.00 2020-03-09
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
NOVA CHEMICALS CORPORATION
Past Owners on Record
BROWN, STEPHEN JOHN
DOBBIN, CHRISTOPHER JOHN BROOKE
SWABEY, JOHN WILLIAM
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Description 2001-05-11 23 924
Claims 2001-05-11 2 49
Abstract 2001-05-11 1 37
Cover Page 2002-11-01 1 40
Abstract 2008-11-14 1 37
Claims 2008-11-14 2 44
Description 2008-11-14 23 874
Cover Page 2009-08-11 1 42
Assignment 2001-05-11 4 199
Prosecution-Amendment 2006-03-14 1 43
Prosecution-Amendment 2008-06-04 3 86
Correspondence 2009-06-23 1 40
Prosecution-Amendment 2008-11-14 29 1,037