Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
CA 02348205 2004-07-06
1
NETWORK PROTECTION ARCHITECTURE
Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to network protection architectures in
s general, and ring interworking architectures in particular.
Background of the Invention
ITU-T Recommendation 6.842 (04/97) entitled "Interworking of SDH Network
Protection Architectures"(hereinafter referred to as "G.842 ") discusses dual
ring network
protection architectures including inter alia a form of dual node
interconnection termed ring interworking. One implementation of ring
interworking is the so-called SubNetwork Connection Protection (SNCP) ring
interworking architecture which is characterized by its top ring and its
bottom
is ring being mirror images of one another. .
Generally. speaking, the term ring interworking refers to a dual ring
network topology which includes top and bottom rings each having an I/O node
with a transmit tributary and a receive tributary, two west working channels
. between the I/O node and an west interconnection node from the perspective
of
2o the top ring, and two east protection channels between the I/O node and an
east
interconnection node from the perspective of the top ring. The terms "working
channel " and ' protection channel " are purely descriptive to distinguish
between two identical channels except that a ring's working channel is
typically its default active channel in terms of signal flow therealong. Only
one
zs of a ring's working and protection channels may be active in terms of
end-to-end signal flow therealong at any one time, if at all.
The opposite west interconnection nodes of the top and bottom rings
define a west interconnection interface and, similarly, the opposite east
interconnection nodes of the top and bottom rings define an east
30 - interconnection interface. Each interconnection interface has a pair of
lines
CA 02348205 2001-05-23
Z
bridging across the rings, one of which is employed as a so-called top down
receive line from the transmit tributary of the top ring's I/O node to the
receive
tributary of the bottom ring's I/O node via either a top down west working
channel or a bottom up east protection channel. Conversely, the other line is
s employed as a so-called bottom up transmit line from the transmit tributary
of
the bottom ring's I/O node to the receive tributary of the top ring's I/O node
via
either a bottom up west working channel or a bottom up east working channel.
It is a commonly purported that ring interworking and, in particular, a
6.842 compliant S1~CP ring interworking architecture pravides top down fiber
0 optic network survivability as long as one of the top ring's top down
working
or protection channels, one of the bottom ring's top down working or
protection channels, and one of the east or west interconnection interfaces'
receive lines remain intact. However, topological analysis of a 6.842
compliant SNCP ring interworking architecture reveals that the east and west
is interconnection interfaces' receive lines are each connectable to the
receive
tributary at the bottom ring's I/O node from their respective sides only from
the
perspective of the top ring, namely, the west interconnection interface's
receive
line is only connectable to the bottom ring's I/O node from the west and
conversely the east interconnection interface's receive line is only
connectable
2o to the bottom ring's I/O node from the east. Due to this, a 6.842 compliant
SNCP ring interworking architecture cannot provide top down fiber optic
integrity in the case of a double fiber optic failure involving the west
interconnection interface's receive line and the bottom ring's east protection
channel nor the east interconnection interface's receive line and the bottom
zs ring's west working channel.
The above analysis equally applies to bottom up fiber optic network
survivability by virtue of the symmetrical nature of a 6.842 compliant SNCP
ring interworking architecture.
CA 02348205 2001-05-23
3
There is a need to provide a network protection architecture with fiber
optic network survivability capabilities above and beyond those of a 6.842
compliant SNCP ring interworking architecture.
s Summary of the Invention
In accordance with the present invention, there is provided a network
protection architecture comprising:
(a) a top ring with an I/O Node A having a transmit tributary TTA
and a-receive tributary RTA, a top down west working channel
to WCAB, a bottom up west working channel WCBA, a top down east
protection channel PCa~, a bottom up east protection channel
PC~A, and two double switch interconnection nodes B and C;
(b) a bottom ring with an I/O Node Z having a transmit tributary TTZ
and a receive tributary RTZ, a top down west working channel
Is WCDZ, a bottom up west working channel WCZD, a top down east
protection channel PCEZ, a bottom up east protection channel
PCZE, and two double switch interconnection nodes D and E;
(c) said interconnection nodes B and D having a receive line RLBD
and a transmit line TLDB bridging thereacross;
20 (d) said interconnection nodes C and E having a receive line RL~E
and a transmit line TLE~ bridging thereacross;
(e) said interconnection node B having switches S 1 and SS, said
switch S1 switching said receive line RLBD between said working
channel WCAB between and said protection channel PCAC, and
2s said switch SS switching said working channel WCBA between
said transmit line TLDB and said transmit line TLEC;
(fj said interconnection node C having switches S2 and S6, said
switch S2 switching said receive line RL~E between said working
channel WCAB and said protection channel PCA~, and said switch
CA 02348205 2001-05-23
4
S6 switching said protection channel PCcA between said transmit
line TLDB and said transmit line TLEC;
(g) said interconnection node D having switches S3 and S~, said
switch S3 switching said transmit line TLDB between said working
channel WCZD and said protection channel PCZE, and said switch
S~ switching said working channel WCDZ between said receive
line RLBD and said receive line RLcE; and
(h) said interconnection node E having switches S4 and S8, said
switch S4 switching said transmit line TLEC between said working
to channel WCZD and said protection channel PCZE, and said switch
S8 switching said protection channel PCEZ between said receive
line RLBD and said receive line RLcE.
The network protection architecture of the present invention is based on
the realization that a 6.842 compliant SNCP ring interworking architecture
is with additional limited switching capability can provide full top down and
bottom up fiber optic network survivability in the face of all fiber optic
failures
except truly catastrophic failures.
Brief Description of the Drawings
2o In order to understand the present invention and to see how it may be
carried out in practice, a preferred embodiment will now be described, by way
of a non-limiting example only, with reference to the following drawings, in
which:
Fig. 1 is a schematic representation of a failure free 6.842 compliant
2s SNCP ring interworking architecture;
Fig. 2 is a schematic representation of the network protection
architecture of Figure 1 displaying fiber optic network survivability in the
face
of a first exemplary double fiber optic failure;
CA 02348205 2001-05-23
s
Fig. 3 is a schematic representation of the network protection
architecture of Figure 1 displaying fiber optic network survivability in the
face
of a second exemplary double fiber optic failure;
Fig. 4 is a schematic representation of the network protection
s architecture of Figure 1 displaying fiber optic network survivability in the
face
of a third exemplary double fiber optic failure;
Fig. 5 is a schematic representation of the network protection
architecture of Figure 1 displaying fiber optic network failure in the face of
a
fourth exemplary double fiber optic failure;
io Fig. 6 is a schematic representation of a failure free network protection
architecture in accordance with the present invention;
Fig. 7 is a schematic representation of the network protection
architecture of Figure 6 displaying fiber optic network survivability in the
face
of the double fiber optic failure of Figure 5; and
~s Fig. 8 is a schematic representation of the network protection
architecture of Figure 6 displaying fiber optic network failure in the face of
a
truly catastrophic failure.
Detailed Description of the Drawings
20 For the sake of clarity, so-called end-to-end active routes between a top
ring's I/O node and a bottom ring's I/O node are shown in solid lines with
large
arrows depicting the direction of communication flow between the one of the
node's transmit tributary and the other node's receive tributary. Against
this,
an inactive route originating at the transmit tributary of either the top
ring's or
25 the bottom ring's I/O node is shown in a solid line with small arrows
depicting
the direction of information flow therefrom irrespective of the existence of a
fiber optic failure therealong.
The following nomenclature is employed hereinbelow: TA is the transmit
signal at the top ring's I/O node's transmit tributary; RA is the receive
signal at
3o the top ring's I/O node's receive tributary, if any; AZ, is the signal
along the
CA 02348205 2001-05-23
6
west interconnection interface's receive line, if any; ZAI is the signal along
the
west interconnection interface's transmit line, if any; AZ2 is the signal
along
the east interconnection interface's receive line, if any; ZA2 is the signal
along
the east interconnection interface's transmit line, if any; TZ is the transmit
s signal at the bottom ring's I/O node's transmit tributary; and RZ is the
receive
signal at the bottom ring's I/O node's receive tributary, if any.
Figure 1 shows a failure free 6.842 compliant SNCP ring interworking
architecture 1 (hereinafter referred to as "the architecture 1 ") having a top
ring
2 with an I/O Node=A having a transmit tributary TTA and a receive tributary
RTA, a top down west working channel WCAB, a bottom up west working
channel WCBA, a top down east protection channel PCA~, a bottom up east
protection channel PC~A, and two single switch interconnection nodes B and C
respectively having switches S1 and SZ. Similarly, the architecture 1 has a
bottom ring 3 with an I/O Node Z having a transmit tributary TTZ and a receive
is tributary RTZ, a top down west working channel WCDZ, a bottom up west
working channel WCZD, a top down east protection channel PCEZ, a bottom up
east protection channel PCZE, and two single switch interconnection nodes D
and E respectively having switches S3 and S~. The two interconnection nodes B
and D, and the two interconnection nodes C and E, respectively define west
2o and east interconnection interfaces 4 and 5 having two receive lines RLBD
and
RLcE and two transmit lines TLDB and TLE~. Both the switches S1 and S2
respectively switch the receive lines RLBp and RL~E between the working
channel WCAB and the protection channel PCA~. Both the switches S3 and S4
respectively switch the transmit lines TLDB and TLE~ between the working
2s channel WCZD and the protection channel PCZE. As shown, the failure free
architecture 1 employs top down and bottom up active routes between the I/O
Node A and the I/O Node Z such that: RZ = AZ1 = TA and RA = ZA, =TZ.
Figure 2 shows that the architecture 1 even though incurring a double
fiber optic failure denoted F, along the working channel WCAB and the receive
CA 02348205 2001-05-23
7
line RLBD still retains both top down and bottom up active routes between the
I/O Node A and the I/O Node Z such that: RZ = AZZ = TA and RA = ZA1 = TZ.
Figure 3 shows that the architecture 1 even though incurring a double
fiber optic failure denoted F2 along the protection channel PCA~ and the
receive
s line RLBD still retains both top down and bottom up active routes between
the
I/O Node A and the I/O Node Z such that: RZ = AZZ = TA and RA = ZA, = TZ,
Figure 4 shows that the architecture 1 even though incurring a double
fiber optic failure denoted F3 along the working channel WCDZ and the receive
line RLBD still retairrg both top down and bottom up active routes between the
to I/O Node A and the I/O Node Z such that: RZ= AZZ = TA and RA = ZAI = TZ,
Figure 5 shows that the architecture 1 when incurring a double fiber
optic failure denoted F4 along the protection channel PCE~ and the receive
line
RLBD only retains a bottom up active route between the I/O Node A and the I/O
Node Z such that: RZ = 0 and RA = ZA1 = TZ,
is Figure 6 shows a failure free network protection architecture 21 based
on the architecture 1 and further including an additional switch in each one
of
the interconnection nodes B, C, D and E. The interconnection node B includes
an additional switch S5 for switching the working channel WCBA between the
transmit lines TLDB and TLE~. The interconnection node C includes an
2o additional switch S6 for switching the protection channel PC~A between the
transmit lines TLDB and TLE~. The interconnection node D includes an
additional switch S~ for switching the working channel WCDZ between the
receive lines RLBD and RL~E. The interconnection node E includes an
additional switch S8 for switching the protection channel PCEZ between the
2s receive lines RLBD and RL~E. The active routes in failure free architecture
21
are identical to the active routes in the failure free architecture 1 such
that
RZ = AZ 1 = TA and RA = ZA i = TL.
Figure 7 shows that the architecture 21 retains a top down active route
between the I/O Node A and the I/O Node Z even in the face of the double
o fiber optic failure F~ such that RZ = AZ2 = TA and RA = ZA1 = TZ.
CA 02348205 2001-05-23
8
Figure 8 shows that the architecture 21 does not display fiber optic
network survivability in the top down direction in the face of truly
catastrophic
double fiber optic failures, namely, a double fiber optic fiber failure
denoted FS
in the working channel WC,e,g and the protection channel PCA~; double fiber
s optic failure denoted F6 in the receive lines RLBD and RL~E; and a double
fiber
optic failure denoted F~ in the working channel WCDZ and the protection
channel PCEZ. Neither does the architecture 21 provide fiber optic network
survivability in the bottom up direction in the face of mirror image double
fiber
optic failures to the- double fiber optic failures F5, F6 and F~. It should be
io appreciated that the above mentioned truly catastrophic failures also
disrupt
fiber optic network survivability of the 6.842 compliant SNCP ring
interworking architecture 1.
Moreover, neither the architecture 1 nor the architecture 21 provide
network integrity in the case of nodal failure at either one or both of the
I/O
is nodes A and Z, and/or simultaneous nodal failures of the interconnection
nodes
B and C, the interconnection nodes D and E, the interconnection nodes B and
E, and the interconnection nodes C and D.
While the invention has been described with respect to a limited number
20 of embodiments, it can be appreciated that many variations, modifications,
and
other applications of the invention can be made without departing from the
scope of the claims appended hereto as follows: First, the two interconnection
nodes on each of the two rings can be combined into a single interconnection
node. Second, the top ring of the architecture 21 can be dispensed with except
2s for its I/O Node A which can be directly connected to the receive lines
RLBD
and RL~E and the transmit lines TLDB and TLE~ whilst still benefiting from the
present invention. Third, the invention can be implemented in other
transmission technologies including SONET, DWDM, and others, and also the
fiber optic links can be replaced by other transmission media.
