Language selection

Search

Patent 2352887 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2352887
(54) English Title: PRODUCTION OF LOW SULFUR/LOW AROMATICS DISTILLATES
(54) French Title: PRODUCTION DE DISTILLATS A FAIBLE TENEUR EN SOUFRE ET EN AROMATIQUES
Status: Expired
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C10G 45/00 (2006.01)
  • C10G 65/12 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • ELLIS, EDWARD STANLEY (United States of America)
  • JUNG, HENRY (United States of America)
  • LEWIS, WILLIAM ERNEST (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • EXXON RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY (United States of America)
(71) Applicants :
  • EXXON RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY (United States of America)
(74) Agent: BORDEN LADNER GERVAIS LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2010-07-27
(86) PCT Filing Date: 1999-12-07
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 2000-06-15
Examination requested: 2004-11-18
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/US1999/028790
(87) International Publication Number: WO2000/034416
(85) National Entry: 2001-05-29

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
60/111,346 United States of America 1998-12-08

Abstracts

English Abstract





A process for hydroprocessing a hydrotreated liquid distillate where the
feedstream is fed to reaction vessel (R1) via line (10) along
with a hydrogen-containing treat gas via line (12). A combined liquid phase
and vapor phase product stream exit reaction vessel (R1) via
line (16). The vapor phase product stream is collected overhead via line (20).
The liquid reaction product is passed to reaction vessel (R2)
via line (20) and passed downwardly through the reaction zones (22a) and (22b)
or reaction zone (R2).


French Abstract

L'invention concerne un procédé d'hydrotraitement d'un distillat liquide hydrotraité, consistant à introduire le flux d'alimentation dans une cuve (R1) de réaction via le conduit (10), ainsi qu'un gaz de traitement renfermant de l'hydrogène via le conduit (12). Le flux produit à phases liquide et vapeur combinées sort de la cuve (R1) de réaction via le conduit (16). Le flux produit en phase vapeur est collecté en tête de distillation via le conduit (20). Le produit de réaction liquide traverse la cuve (R2) de réaction via le conduit (20) puis, s'écoule vers le bas, à travers les zones de réaction (22a) et (22b) ou la zone de réaction (R2).

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.





-12-



CLAIMS:


1. A two stage process for hydroprocessing a hydrotreated distillate feedstock
which
process consisting essentially of:
(a) reacting said hydrotreated distillate feedstock in a first reaction stage
in the
presence of a once-through hydrogen-containing treat gas cascaded from the
second
reaction stage herein, said first reaction stage containing one or more
reaction zones
operated at hydrodesulfurization conditions wherein each reaction zone
contains a bed of
hydrotreating catalyst, and wherein said once-through hydrogen-containing
treat gas
cascaded from the second reaction stage comprises all of the vapor effluent
from the
second reaction stage;
(b) passing the resulting reactant to a separation zone wherein a vapor phase
stream and a liquid phase stream are produced;
(c) collecting said vapor phase stream overhead;
(d) introducing fresh hydrogen-containing treat gas into a second reaction
stage; and
(e) passing said liquid phase stream to a said second reaction stage in the
presence of said fresh hydrogen-containing treat gas from step (d), said
second reaction
stage containing one or more reaction zones operated at aromatics saturation
conditions
wherein each reaction zone contains a bed of aromatics saturation catalyst,
and wherein
said hydrogen-containing treat gas is passed through said reaction stage
countercurrent to
the flow of said liquid phase stream.


2. The process of claim 1, wherein the liquid phase stream, before it passes
through
said second reaction stage, is stripped to reduce its content of dissolved
vapor phase
product by contacting the liquid with a stripping gas.


3. The process of claim 2, wherein the stripping gas is the vapor phase
effluent from
the second reaction stage.





-13-



4. The process of claim 3, wherein the stripping gas and liquid phase stream
is
contacted in a vapor/liquid contacting zone which is vertically disposed above
the second
reaction zone.


5. The process of claim 4, wherein the vapor/liquid contacting zone is
operated in
countercurrent flow wherein vapor flows counter to the downward flowing liquid
phase
stream.


6. The process of claim 1, wherein the vapor phase stream from the first
reaction
stage is cooled and the resulting condensed liquid stream is separated from
the remaining
uncondensed stream, and a portion of the condensed liquid stream is combined
with the
liquid feed to the first reaction stage.


7. The process of claim 2, wherein the vapor phase steam from the first
reaction stage
is cooled and the resulting condensed liquid stream is separated from the
remaining
uncondensed stream, and a portion of the condensed liquid stream is combined
with the
liquid feed to the second reaction stage.


8. The process of claim 4, wherein the vapor phase stream from the first
reaction
stage is cooled and the resulting condensed liquid stream is separated from
the remaining
uncondensed stream, and a portion of the condensed liquid stream is used as a
quench
liquid between two or more of the reaction zones of the first or second
reaction stage.


9. The process of claim 4, wherein the first reaction stage is vertically
disposed above
the vapor/liquid contacting zone.


10. The process of claim 9, wherein the liquid feedstock flows downward
through said
one or more reaction zones countercurrent to said hydrogen-containing treat
gas.


11. The process of claim 1, wherein the hydrogen-containing treat gas is
cascaded
from a vapor/liquid contacting zone which is vertically disposed above the
second reaction
zone.


Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.



CA 02352887 2001-05-29

WO 00/34416 PCT/US99/28790
PRODUCTION OF LOW SULFUR/LOW AROMATICS DISTILLATES
BACKGROUND OF THE DISCI.O 1L .RF.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to a process for hydroprocessing a
hydrotreated liquid distillate stream to produce a stream exceptionally low in
sulfur as well as aromatics. A hydrotreated distillate stream is further
hydrotreated in a co-current reaction zone wherein the reaction product is
passed
to a separation drum wherein a vapor product is collected overhead and a
liquid
product is passed to an aromatics saturation zone countercurrent to the flow
of
hydrogen treat gas.

BACKGRQUND OF THE INVENTION

Environmental and regulatory initiatives are requiring ever lower
levels of both sulfur and aromatics in distillate fuels. For example, proposed
sulfur limits for distillate fuels marketed in the European Union for the year
2005
is 50 wppm or less. There are also regulations that will require lower levels
of
total aromatics in hydrocarbons and, more specifically, the multiring
aromatics
found in distillate fuels and heavier hydrocarbon products. Further, the
maximum allowable aromatics level for U.S. on-road diesel, CARB reference
diesel and Swedish Class I diesel are 35, 10 and 5 vol.%, respectively.
Further,
the CARB and Swedish Class I diesel fuels allow no more than 1.4 and 0.02
vol.% polyaromatics, respectively.

Much work is presently being done in hydrotreating because of greater
demands for the removal of heteroatoms, most notably sulfur, from
transportation and heating fuel streams. Hydrotreating, or in the case of
sulfur


CA 02352887 2001-05-29

WO 00/34416 PCT/US99/28790
-2-
removal. hydrodesulfurization, is well known in the art and usually requires
treating the petroleum streams with hydrogen in the presence of a supported
catalyst at hydrotreating conditions. The catalyst is typically comprised ot'a
Group
VI metal with one or more Group VIII metals as promoters on a refractory
support.
Hydrotreating catalysts which are particularly suitable for
hydrodesulfurization and
hydrodenitrogenation generally contain molybdenum or tungsten on alumina
promoted with a metal such as cobalt, nickel, iron, or a combination thereot:
Cobalt promoted molybdenum on alumina, and nickel promoted molybdenum on
alumina catalysts are most widely used when the limiting specifications are
hydrodesulfurization, while nickel promoted molybdenum on alumina catalysts
are
the most widely used for hydrodenitrogenation and partial aromatic saturation.

Much work is being done to develop more active catalysts and
improved reaction vessel designs in order to meet the demand for more
effective
hydroprocessing processes. Various improved hardware configurations have
been suggested. One such configuration is a countercurrent design wherein the
feedstock flows downward through successive catalyst beds counter to
upflowing treat gas, which is typically a hydrogen containing treat-gas. The
downstream catalyst beds, relative to the flow of feed can contain high
performance, but otherwise more sulfur sensitive catalysts because the
upflowing
treat gas carries away heteroatom components such as H2S and NH3 that are
deleterious to the sulfur and nitrogen sensitive catalysts. While such
countercurrent reactors have commercial potential, they never-the-less are
susceptible to flooding. That is, where upflowing treat gas and gaseous
products
impede the downward flow of feed. Such flooding tendency is increased with
increases in treat gas rate.

Other process configurations include the use of multiple reaction
stages, either in a single reaction vessel, or in separate reaction vessels.
More


CA 02352887 2001-05-29

WO 00/34416 PCT/US99/28790
-3-
sulfur sensitive catalysts can be used in downstream stages as the level of
heteroatom components becomes successively lower. European Patent
Application 93200165.4 teaches a two-stage hydrotreating process performed in
a single reaction vessel, but there is no suggestion of a unique stripping
arrangement for the liquid reaction stream from each reaction stage.

Two types of process schemes are commonly employed to achieve
substantial hydrodesulfurization (HDS)/ aromatics saturation (ASAT) of
distillate fuels and both are operated at relatively high pressures. One is a
single
stage process using Ni/Mo or Ni/W sulfide catalysts operating at pressures in
excess of 800 psig. To achieve high levels of saturation pressures in excess
of
2,000 psig are required. The other is a two stage process in which the feed is
first processed over Co/Mo, Ni/Mo or Ni/W sulfide catalyst at moderate
pressure
to reduce heteroatom levels while little aromatics saturation is observed.
After
the first stage the product is stripped to remove H2S, NH3 and light
hydrocarbons. The first stage product is then reacted over a Group VIII metal
hydrogenation catalyst at elevated pressure to achieve aromatics saturation.
The
two stage processes are typically operated between 600 and 1,500 psig.

In light of the above, there is a need for improved
desulfurization/aromatic saturation process for treating feedstreams so that
they
can meet the ever stricter environmental regulations.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In accordance with the present invention there is provided a two
stage process for hydroprocessing a hydrotreated distillate feedstock which
process comprises:

a) reacting said feedstock in a first reaction stage in the presence of a
hydrogen-containing treat gas cascaded from, or partially cascaded from, the


CA 02352887 2001-05-29

WO 00/34416 PCT/US99/28790
-4-
second stage herein, said first reaction stage containing one or more reaction
zones operated at hydrodesulfurization conditions wherein each reaction zone
contains a bed of hydrotreating catalyst;

b) passing the resulting reactant to a separation zone wherein a vapor
phase stream and a liquid phase stream are produced;

c) collecting said vapor phase stream overhead; and

d) passing said liquid phase stream to a second reaction stage in the
presence of a hydrogen-containing treat gas, said reaction stage containing
one or
more reaction zones operated at aromatics saturation conditions wherein each
reaction zone contains a bed of aromatics saturation catalyst, and wherein
said
hydrogen-containing treat gas is passed through said reaction stage
countercurrent to the flow of said liquid phase stream.

In a prefered embodiment of the present invention, the liquid phase
stream, before it passes through said second reaction stage is contacted with
a
vapor to strip dissolved gases from the liquid phase.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURE

The figure hereof shows multiple reaction vessels of the present
invention showing separation of the liquid phase product from the vapor phase
product and further processing of the liquid phase product stream in an
aromatics
saturation stage.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Feedstocks suitable for being treated by the present invention are
those petroleum based feedstocks boiling in the distillate range and above and
which have previously been hydrotreated to reduce the sulfur and nitrogen
levels.
Typical sulfur levels in such hydrotreated distillates are in the range of
less than


CA 02352887 2001-05-29

WO 00/34416 PCT/US99/28790
-5-
about 3,000 wppm, more preferably to less than about 1,000 wppm, most
preferably to less than about 500 wppm sulfur, ideally to less than about 350
wppm. Non-limiting examples of such feeds include diesel fuels, jet fuels,
heating oils, and lubes. Such feeds typically have a boiling range from about
150
to about 600 C, preferably from about 175 to about 400 C. It is highly
desirable
for the refiner to upgrade these types of feedstocks by removing as much of
the
sulfur as possible, as well as to saturate aromatic compounds.

The process of the present invention can be better understood by a
description of a preferred embodiment illustrated by Figure 1 hereof. The
current invention offers an improvement over the prior art by using only once
through hydrogen treat gas. For purposes of discussion, the first reaction
stage
RI is a hydrotreating stage to further reduce the level of sulfur and
nitrogen, and
the second reaction stage R2 is an aromatics saturation stage. The hydrogen
reacts with the impurities to convert them to H2S, NHJ, and water vapor, which
are removed as part of the vapor effluent, and it also saturates olefins and
aromatics. Miscellaneous reaction vessel internals, valves, pumps,
thermocouples, and heat transfer devices etc. are not shown for simplicity.
Figure 1 shows reaction vessel Rlwhich contains reaction zonesl0a and 1Ob,
each of which is comprised of a bed of hydrotreating catalyst, although only a
single or more than two reaction zones can be employed. It is preferred that
the
catalyst be in the reactor as a fixed bed, although other types of catalyst
arrangements can be used, such as slurry or ebullating beds. Downstream of
each reaction zone is a non-reaction zone 12 a and 12b. The non-reaction zone
is
typically void of catalyst, that is, it will be an empty section in the vessel
with
respect to catalyst. Although not shown, there may also be provided a liquid
distribution means upstream of each reaction stage. The type of liquid
distribution means is believed not to limit the practice of the present
invention,
but a tray arrangement is preferred, such as sieve trays, bubble cap trays, or
trays


CA 02352887 2001-05-29

WO 00134416 PCT/US99128790
-6-
with spray nozzles, chimneys, tubes, etc. A vapor-liquid mixing device (not
shown) can also be employed in non-reaction zone 12a for the purpose of
introducing a quench fluid (liquid or vapor) for temperature control.

The feedstream is fed to reaction vessel R1 via line 10 along with a
hydrogen-containing treat gas via line 12. The hydrogen-containing treat gas
is
cascaded from reaction stage R2. Make up hydrogen-containing treat gas can
also be added via line 14. It is preferred that the rate of intoduction of
treat gas
be less than or equal to 3 times the chemical hydrogen consumption of the
reactions in both stages, more preferably less than about 2 times, and most
preferably less than about 1.5 times. The feedstream and hydrogen-containing
treat gas pass, cocurrently, through the one or more reaction zones of
reaction
vessel R1, which represents the first reaction stage wherein the feedstream is
further hydrotreated to remove substantially all of the heteroatoms from the
feedstream. It is preferred that the first reaction stage contain a Co-Mo, or
Ni-
Mo, on refractory support catalyst, and a downstream reaction stage contain a
Ni-Mo on refractory support catalyst.

The term "hydrotreating" as used herein refers to processes
wherein a hydrogen-containing treat gas is used in the presence of a suitable
catalyst which is primarily active for the removal of heteroatoms, such as
sulfur,
and nitrogen, and for some hydrogenation of aromatics. Suitable hydrotreating
catalysts for use in the present invention are any conventional hydrotreating
catalyst and includes those which are comprised of at least one Group VIII
metal,
preferably Fe, Co and Ni, more preferably Co and/or Ni, and most preferably
Co;
and at least one Group VI metal, preferably Mo and W, more preferably Mo, on
a high surface area support material, preferably alumina. Other suitable
hydrotreating catalyst supports include zeolites, amorphous silica-alumina,
and
titania-alumina Noble metal catalysts can also be employed, preferably when


CA 02352887 2004-12-03

-7-
the noble metal is selected from Pd and Pt. It is within the scope of the
present
invention that more than one type of hydrotreating catalyst he used in the
same
reaction vessel. The Group VII1 metal is typically present in an amount
ranging
from about 2 to 20 wt.%, preferably from about 4 to 12%. The Group Vl metal
will typically be present in an amount ranging from about 5 to 50 wt.%,

preferably from about 10 to 40 wt.%, and more preferably from about 20 to 30
wt.%. All metals weight percents are on support. By "on support" we niean that
the percents are based on the weight of the support. For example. if the
support
were to weigh 100 g. then 20 wt.% Group VIII metal would mean that 20 g. of
Group VIII metal was on the support. Typical hydrotreating temperatures range
from about 100 C to about 400 C with pressures from about 50 psig to about
3,000 psig, preferably from about 50 psig to about 2,500 psig.

A combined liquid phase and vapor phase product stream exit
reaction vessel R1 via line 16 and into separation zone S wherein a liquid
phase
product stream is separated from a vapor phase product stream. The liquid
phase
product stream will typically be one that has components boiling in the range
from about 150 C to about 650 C, but will not have a boiling range greater
than
the feedstream. The vapor phase product stream is collected overhead via line
18.

The liquid reaction product from separation zone S is passed to
reaction vessel R2 via line 20 and is passed downwardly through the reaction
zones 22a and 22b of reaction stage R2. Prior to being passed downwardly
through reaction stage R2, said liquid reaction product stream can first be
contacted in a stripping zone to remove entrapped vapor components from the
liquid stream. For example, as the liquid product stream tiows through the
stripping zone, it is contacted by uptlowing hydrogen-containing treat gas
under
conditions effective for transferring at least a portion of the feed
impurities in the


CA 02352887 2001-05-29

WO 00/34416 PCT/US99/28790
-8-
vapor into the liquid. The contacting means comprises any known vapor- liquid
contacting means, such as rashig rings, berl saddles, wire mesh, ribbon. open
honeycomb, gas-liquid contacting trays, such as bubble cap trays and other
devices, etc.

Fresh hydrogen-containing treat gas is introduced into reaction
stage R2 via line 24 and is is passed in an upward direction counter to the
flow of
liquid reaction product. The introduction of clean treat gas (gas
substantially free
of H2S and NH3) allows reaction stage R2 to be operated more efficiently owing
to a reduction in the activity suppression effects on the catalyst exerted by
H,S
and NH3 and an increase in H2 partial pressure. This type of two stage
operation
is particularly attractive for very deep removal of sulfur and nitrogen or
when a
more sensitive catalvst (i.e., hydrocracking, aromatic saturation. etc) is
used in
the second reactor. Another advantage of the present invention is that the
treat
gas rate is relatively low compared with more conventional processes. The use
of
relatively low treat gas rates is primarily due to the use of previously

hydrotreated distillate feedstocks. Further efficiencies are gained by not
requiring recycle of treat gas.

The liquid/vapor separation step (S) may be a simple flash or may
involve the addition of stripping steam or gas to improve the removal of H,S
and
NH3. The liquid stream and treat gas are passed countercurrent to each other
through one or more catalyst beds, or reaction zones, 22a and 22b. The
reulting
liquid product stream exits reaction stage R2 via line 26, and a hydrogen-
containing vapor product stream exits reaction stage R2 and is cascaded to
reaction stage Rl. Reaction stage R2 also contains non reaction zones 23a and
23b following each reaction zones. The catalyst in this second reaction stage
is
an aromatic saturation catalyst.


CA 02352887 2009-07-17

-9-
"1'he figure also shows several options. For example. lines 30 and
32 can carry kerosene which can be used as a quench fluid. Also. a unsaturated
feedstock can also be introduced into the first reaction staa.e via line 28.
The
deeree of unsaturation can be up to about 50 wt. ' .

The reaction stages used in the practice ot'the present invention are
operated at suitable temperatures and pressures for the desired reaction. For
example, typical hydroprocessing temperatures will range from about 40 C to
about 450 C at pressures from about 50 psig to about 3.000 psig, preferably 50
to 2,500 psig.

For purposes of hvdroprocessing and in the context of the
invention. the terms "hvdrogen" and "hydrogen-containing treat gas" are
synonymous and may be either pure hydrogen or a hydrogen-containin2 treat gas

which is a treat gas stream containing hydrogen in an amount at least
sufficient
for the intended reaction, plus other gas or gasses (e.g., nitrogen and light
hydrocarbons such as methane) which will not adversely interfere with or
affect
either the reactions or the products. Impurities, such as H,7S and NH3 are
undesirable and, if present in significant amounts. will normally be removed
from the treat gas. before it is fed into the reactor. The treat gas stream
introduced into a reaction stage will preferably contain at least about 50
vol. %.
more preferably at least about 75 vol. % hydrogen, and most preterablv at
least
95 vol. %. in operations in which unreacted hydrogen in the vapor effluent of
any particular stage is used for hydroprocessing in any stage, there must be
sufficient hvdrogen present in the fresh treat gas introduced into that stage,
for
the vapor effluent of that stage to contain sufficient hydrogen for the
subsequent
stage or stages. It is preferred in the practice of the invention, that all or
a
portion of the hvdroQen required for the first stage hvdroprocessing be
contained
in the second stage vapor effluent fed up into the first stage. The first
stage


CA 02352887 2001-05-29

WO 00/34416 PCT/US99/28790
-10-
vapor effluent will be cooled to condense and recover the hvdrotreated and
relatively ciean, heavier (e.g., C4-C5+ ) hydrocarbons.

Non-limiting examples of aromatic hydrogenation catalysts include
nickel, cobalt-molybdenum, nickel-molybdenum, and nickel-tungsten. Noble
metal containing catalysts can also be used. Non-limiting exatnples of noble
metal catalysts include those based on platinum and/or palladium, which is
preferably supported on a suitable support material, typically a refractory
oxide
material such as alumina, silica, alumina-silica, kieselguhr, diatomaceous
earth,
magnesia, and zirconia. Zeolitic supports can also be used. Such catalysts are
typically susceptible to sulfur and nitrogen inhibition or poisoning. The
aromatic
saturation stage is preferably operated at a temperature from about 40 C to
about
400 C, more preferably from about 200 C to about 350 C, at a pressure from
about 100 psig to about 3,000 psig, preferably from about 200 psig to about

1,200 psig, and at a liquid hourly space velocity (LHSV) of from about 0.3
V/V/Hr. to about 10 V/V/Hr, preferably from about 1 to 5 V/V/Hr.

The liquid phase in the reaction vessels used in the present
invention will typically consist primarily of the higher boiling point
components
of the feed. The vapor phase will typically be a mixture of hydrogen-
containing
treat gas, heteroatom impurities like H,S and NH3, and vaporized lower-boiling
components in the fresh feed, as well as light products of hydroprocessing

reactions. If the vapor phase effluent still requires further hydroprocessing,
it
can be passed to a vapor phase reaction stage containing additional
hydroprocessing catalyst and subjected to suitable hydroprocessing conditions
for further reaction. Alternatively, the hydrocarbons in the vapor phase
products
can be condensed via cooling of the vapors, with the resulting condensate
liquid
being recycled to either of the reaction stages, if necessary. It is also
within the
scope of the present invention that a feedstock which alreadv contains
adequately


CA 02352887 2004-12-03

-11-
low levels ot'heteroatoms be fed directlv into the reaction stage for aromatic
saturation and/or crackint;

The present invention can be better understood by ret'erence to the
foilowing example that is present lor illustrative purposes only and is not to
be
taken as limiting the invention in any way.

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date 2010-07-27
(86) PCT Filing Date 1999-12-07
(87) PCT Publication Date 2000-06-15
(85) National Entry 2001-05-29
Examination Requested 2004-11-18
(45) Issued 2010-07-27
Expired 2019-12-09

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 2001-05-29
Application Fee $300.00 2001-05-29
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 2 2001-12-07 $100.00 2001-09-25
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 3 2002-12-09 $100.00 2002-10-23
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 4 2003-12-08 $100.00 2003-10-30
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 5 2004-12-07 $200.00 2004-11-09
Request for Examination $800.00 2004-11-18
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 6 2005-12-07 $200.00 2005-10-14
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 7 2006-12-07 $200.00 2006-11-16
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 8 2007-12-07 $200.00 2007-10-19
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 9 2008-12-08 $200.00 2008-10-27
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 10 2009-12-07 $250.00 2009-09-25
Final Fee $300.00 2010-05-13
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 11 2010-12-07 $250.00 2010-11-17
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 12 2011-12-07 $250.00 2011-11-17
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 13 2012-12-07 $250.00 2012-11-15
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 14 2013-12-09 $250.00 2013-11-14
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 15 2014-12-08 $450.00 2014-11-14
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 16 2015-12-07 $450.00 2015-11-13
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 17 2016-12-07 $450.00 2016-11-10
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 18 2017-12-07 $450.00 2017-11-14
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 19 2018-12-07 $450.00 2018-11-15
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
EXXON RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY
Past Owners on Record
ELLIS, EDWARD STANLEY
JUNG, HENRY
LEWIS, WILLIAM ERNEST
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Drawings 2001-05-29 1 16
Representative Drawing 2001-09-18 1 7
Cover Page 2001-09-26 1 38
Abstract 2001-05-29 1 59
Description 2001-05-29 11 568
Claims 2001-05-29 2 91
Description 2004-12-03 11 553
Claims 2004-12-03 2 75
Claims 2009-07-17 2 84
Description 2009-07-17 11 543
Representative Drawing 2010-07-12 1 8
Cover Page 2010-07-12 2 42
Assignment 2001-05-29 4 211
PCT 2001-05-29 11 535
PCT 2001-05-30 4 151
Prosecution-Amendment 2004-11-18 1 19
Prosecution-Amendment 2004-12-03 6 186
Prosecution-Amendment 2009-01-19 3 81
Prosecution-Amendment 2009-07-17 5 202
Correspondence 2010-05-13 1 32