Language selection

Search

Patent 2353585 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2353585
(54) English Title: IMPROVEMENTS IN COATINGS
(54) French Title: PERFECTIONNEMENTS DANS LES REVETEMENTS
Status: Dead
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • B01J 37/02 (2006.01)
  • B01J 29/08 (2006.01)
  • B01J 29/70 (2006.01)
  • B01J 35/04 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • LANZUELA DE ALVARO, FRANCISCO (United Kingdom)
  • MALDE, CHANDRESH NEMCHAND (United Kingdom)
  • PETCH, MICHAEL IAN (United Kingdom)
(73) Owners :
  • JOHNSON MATTHEY PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY (United Kingdom)
(71) Applicants :
  • JOHNSON MATTHEY PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY (United Kingdom)
(74) Agent: RIDOUT & MAYBEE LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(86) PCT Filing Date: 1999-11-22
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 2000-06-08
Examination requested: 2004-11-08
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/GB1999/003858
(87) International Publication Number: WO2000/032311
(85) National Entry: 2001-06-01

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
9826486.4 United Kingdom 1998-12-03

Abstracts

English Abstract




A substrate, such as a plate or catalyst monolith, may be coated with a metal
oxide, particularly with a zeolite, by treating the substrate with a
polyectrolyte to form a coating, and then depositing the coating of metal
oxide from an aqueous slurry. A continuous coating, which may incorporate many
layers, can easily be formed. In the examples polyacrylamide is used as
polyelectrolyte.


French Abstract

Un substrat, tel qu'une plaque ou un monolithe catalythique, peut être revêtu d'un oxyde métallique, et en particulier d'un zéolite, par le traitement dudit substrat avec un polyélecrolyte de façon à former un revêtement, puis par la déposition du revêtement d'oxyde métallique à partir d'une suspension épaisse aqueuse. Un revêtement continu, qui peut comporter plusieurs couches, peut être formé aisément. Dans les exemples, un polyacrilamide est utilisé comme polyélectrolyte.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.





7

CLAIMS

1. A method of depositing metal oxide coatings onto a metal or ceramic
substrate
which comprises treating a surface of said substrate with a polyelectrolyte to
yield a
surface coating of the polyelectrolyte thereon, and subsequently or
simultaneously treating
the coated surface with an aqueous slurry comprising metal oxide particles.

2. A method according to claim 1, wherein said polyelectrolyte is a
polyacrylamide.

3. A method according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the substrate is a metal or
ceramic
catatyst support substrate in plate or monolith form,

4. A method according to claim 1, 2 or 3, wherein the metal oxide is a
zeolite.

5. A method according to claim 1, 2 or 3, wherein the metal oxide is selected
from
alumina, silica, ceria, zirconia, magnesia and mixed oxide catalyst supports.

6. A method according to claim 4 or 5, wherein the metal oxide incorporates a
catalytic component.

7. A, method according to claim 6, wherein the catalytic component is one or
mare
of the platinum group metals.

8. A supported catalyst comprising a plate or monolith coated with a metal
oxide,
produced according to any one of the preceding claims.


Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


I.
RCS ;VflN~~F'A-MU~!VCH~:N Uz . ~-1 i- v : ia:sY~ : uvtu~o 5:iy- .-..,i_:.- ,-
~;.: ...,.. .....~~~.~.~-:: ..
07 11'2000 CA 02353585 2001-06-O1
GB 009903858
PFD 143?
1
j ~N.~..'Rd~.2IrIEN'f S IN CQE~.T14~T~S
This invention concerns ttnprovement,, vn coa~,s. and more especially cons~ms
imgrovernents in methods of rooting metal oxides $.nd the like onto metallic
or non-
metallic substrates.
ltl
it .is very well established to coat metal oxides, s>uch as alumina, ceria.
zirconia,
ete, as single or mixed oxides, flnta metal substrates 2und ceramic such as
honeycomb
through-how catalyst supports, used in huge numbers iv exhaust gas catalysts.
This is
generally achieved by admixing the metal oxiide into t~ aqueous sluxiy
together with
15 suitable components including adhesion modifiers, a~which the "Ludox~
(Trade Ivlarl~)
silica is are exarnpl.e, to form a washeoat slurry. The s~tb;strate is then.
dipped or drenched
~ the slurt~y, and fired to yield a high surface area base for the catalyst.
'The silica nay
form SO v~.~t% or more of the solids content of the slurry, and this clearly
dilutes the
interaction between the catalyst metals and the oxide. w~~ieh is ~:er~J
impor#az~t. There has
20 not been sig~.if~cant impazwement in these coating techniques for Borne 20
or ~0 years, yet
the desa~ of exhaust gas catalysts is becoming rztore: sophisticated and
demanding,
requiring nevv components such as zeolifies and other mufti-layers to be
incorporated. We
believe that ~adi~onal coating methods are ~ilir_g to deal with new
requirements, and in
particular, traditional coating methods give problems irE mufti-layer coating.
We have previously disclosed the use of ~lyel~;.txol3~tes to coat catalyst
particles
etc with zeolites ~cnaier3 simultaneously i~ situ (see EP $78 233). We have
now
discovered that polgelectrolytes can be used to pre-treat metal and cera.cnf.c
substrates
witizout such in cite formation of the zcolites, ire a process in which one or
more pre-
30 formed zneta.! oxides, including aeolites and the like, is deposited onto
the substrate, and
not only is a sound, even coating obtained without requiring dilution with
adhesion
modifiers, (but may include such adhesion modifiers) but the coating is
especially suitable
for the deposition of hZrther coatings of similar or differing type.
35 US 460642? discloses a process fat depositing a catalytie~lly active
material onto
AMENDED SHEET

II
kC:Y~Y()l'~:~YA-~IUGv::wir.iv u~ ~ ~-ii- v : 1:~:'~~~ : Vlll.lti 'J'.'t
.G:,3Gt-. -~-~t~ o:J G:.i~:i~r~V:.r:~ ~r
07-11-200 CA 02353585 2001-06-O1
V GB 009903858
2
a carrier wherein a polyelectrolyte tray be added at 0.2-1..0 percent by
weight as azz acid-
stsble liquefier. bE 230G9~2 discloses coating a polye:~ter resin substrate
with a glue
which is a polyacrylicxrnide and a polyvinyl alcohol.
Accordingly, the present invention provides a method of depositing metal oxide
coatings onto a substrate, which compris°s treating the surface o~ said
substra<e wizh a
polyeleclrol~~te to yield a surface Coating of tl~.e polyelec~rolyie thereon,
and subsequently
or simultaneously treating the coated surface with an a~~ueou.s slurry
con~zprisir~g metal
oxide particles. If required, additional la3Ters of the carne, or different
metal oxide may be
applied, either to increase the loading of the metal oxide oz to form a
rnultilayez~ coating.
Desirably, the polyelect~trolyte is applied in the f<mn of an aqueous
solutiorz eg s
O.~i to 2Q wt% solution, in the case of the rriaterials sp~~eiflcally
described hereinar'ter a.
4 wt%, solution has been fouml satisfactory. Ti he pol3releotroly-te may be
any suita'~le
polyelecu~oly~te, eg anionic or cationic, but polyacrrla~nides are suitable,
such as
"A.Icostat'' (Tradezziark) I67 available ~ozr~ Allied ~ol.loids Ltd, England.
Qt~'~er
polyacrylamides may be considered. Far such materials, desirably, the solution
is
a11ca1ire_e, for examph of pH of approximately 9. F,.outi~ae testing to
optimise the solution
pI-i for each substrate and polyelectrolyte should be undertaken, and may be
acid ar
allcali3ne, primarily depending capon the surface chemistry of floe
subs'~rate. Treatment of
the substrate nay be by any suitable method, izlcluciing spraying, dipping,
vacuum
application, dren;,hing usinb a "waterfall" and the like, and may be carried
out at morn
temperature. Desirably, the polyelectrolyte solution is dried to form a
continuous surface
polymer layer.
The substrate may be any metal or ceramic material, in any form such as plate
ar
rttonolith form, ineltr.ding particularly honeycomb thxoullz-flow catalyst
supports, but also
devices of the type lcz~own as static mi.~ers, which provide good gas or other
fluid mixing.
3fl Zee metal may be, for example, a stainless steel, including "Fecrallo3~"
oz ahuniriiurn, and
the ceramic may be cordierite or the liJh.e. other substrates w~~ich require,
or may be
pzotected by, an oxide coating, should also be cnnsid~red.
AMENDED SHEET


CA 02353585 2001-06-O1
GB 009903858
The term metal oxide includes zeaiites of all types and of all Si to ~I
ratios, and
includes tnodif~ed, eg ion-exchanged zeolites, as well ss "Silicate" and
aecently-availahie
zeol*te-type compositions where Ga ancf In or other suit~~ble metals are
incorporated into
the polite framework structure and sinclc or mixed oxides, for example
selected frorin one
or more of ceria, zirconia, magnesia, alum.ina and silica. The metal oxide is
desirably in
the form of as adueous slurry, eg of about 4C~ vw~C°~a solids content
of particles of the
appropriate particle size; if necessary the metal oxide rns~y be milled to
disperse the metal
oxide whilst simultaneously size reducirtxg. The slurry may, but need rat,
include at-~
lfl adhesion modifier, and may include other coanponents including
catalytically active
particles snd solutions of catatytieally active metals and.~or promoters
therefor, far
exampla the catal~rtic caznponent may be oz~e or more e~f the platinum group
metals.
The sl:ixry is then suitably applied by my method to the polyelectrolyte-
coated
substrate, and is then suitably dried, A. final stage is desirably f ring, or
calciring, to
~.rmly deposit the oride coating en the subsuate. I~~efore the ~t~al firing.
howaver,
additior~ sle~rrri..es of oxide andr'or other components may be deposited, to
result in a
con~nc~us or thicker coating, or a mufti-component ;series of coatings. If
des3tec~ or
necessary, a fur4her polyelectmlyte layer may be applied, and oz~e or mare
additional metal
oxide or other coatzngs nay be applied.
In an alternative eFnbadiment; the polyelectrc~lyte is admixed with the
sltarry
withflut a separaxe pre-coating step. Gtherwise the pro!:~ess atad materials
considerations
are i'ai_rly similar. This es~bodzment is expected to b2 particularly suitable
for depositing
a thin, even coating.
It is believed, although we do not wish to I~~ bound by any theory, that the
polyelectral3~te acts to rever se the charge oz~ the substrate, thus
permitting the slurry
particles td adhere fCrn~ly, and v~re believe that upon de;posatiaz~ of a
second coating, the
polyetectra3yte is "re-activated" and serves to cause excellent adhesion o~
the second
coating.
AMENDED SHEET

.::'1= . G a ~~% . ~ vv -.v.raTiwl V.n ~ .. ..
KI.W:. YliliV~,~.t llWItiL.iW ..lii.:v'~ i..... ~ n i W v . iv m . vamv v -. i
GB 009903858
'.07-'1r1-2000 ~ 02353585 2001-06-O1
~a
Ia is believed tl~.at the present i3zvention has si~icazit and unexpected
benefits in
achieving good coatings on substrates that have pze~e~iously been dit'fxcult
to coat, a3r~d in
particular pez~its so~,ud and erent two or rnulti-layer coatings.
A particular e~.bodiynent of the invention (aa:ording to clan 8) provides a
supported catalyst conaprisi~g a plate or monolith coated. with a metal oxide,
produced by
the meihod of the invention.
The present invention is ill,~strated by the following exaanples.
E~A~'I~E It
An alzun~iuxn plate is soalcad ~xri th aqueo-as 4 wt°~o polyacry=amide
solution at
pH 9. 'fhe Fret plate is ti~..en dried to leave a t'l~izr surface coating of
poyelactrokyte.
The coated plate is dipped into a standard zeolite x,y w~ashcoat slT.irry as
used in t'~e
AMENDED SHEET


CA 02353585 2001-06-O1
WO 00/32311 PCTJGB99J03858
4
exhaust gas catalyst industry, containing 40 wt% zeolite, with the pH adjusted
to between
8 and 9. 'The washcoat adheres to the plate, and the coated plate is removed
and dried at
100 °C for 30 minutes. A further identical washcoat layer was then
applied to deposit a
desired thickness. The coated metal plate is then calcined at 400°C for
2 hours, which
removes the polyelectrolyte residue. A photograph of the thus-coated plate
("A") is shown
in the accompanying drawing page. For comparison, the identical procxdure was
followed
without the polyeiectrolyte treatment. Although a first coating appeared
successful and
even, a second coating caused the combined coating to dramatically peel; a
photograph
of the coated plate is shown as "B" in the drawing. It can readily be seen
that the present
invention permits an even and continuous coating, whereas double coating
without the
polyelectrolyte results in flaking of the coating, and uneven, discontinuous
coating.
Although the above Example utilised a 100% zeolite coating, other successful
coatings can be applied with 50 wt% "Ludox" silica adhesion modifier, or any
other
proportion:
EXAMPLE 2
Zeolite 13X on Aluminium Sheet
An aluminium sheet was coated with zeolite 13X (Zeolyst Int.) using a
polyelectrolyte aqueous solution (5% of Allied Colloids BL06272AQ/Alcostat167,
SD
n°0004568, and pH 9-10). After having fired 'the aluminium plate at
200°C, it was
anodised in a 15% sulphuric acid solution. The pllate was then coated with a
thin layer of
polyelectrolyte, then four consecutive passes of zeolite 13X were applied with
a total
weight gain of 0.578 over a surface of approximately 5 in2 (32 cm2); this
represented a
loading improvement over 3 times greater than could be achieved in previous
experiments. Between the third and the fourth passes, a second layer of
polyelectrolyte
was necessary. Finally, the sheet was calcined at 300°C to burn off the
polyelectrolyte.
EXAMPLE: 3
Zeolite 13X on Aluminiium Monoliths
Two aluminium honeycomb monoliths of different cell density (400 and 200 cells


CA 02353585 2001-06-O1
WO 00/32311 PCT/GB99103$58
per sq.in) were coated with zeolite 13X using a polyelectrolyte aqueous
solution (5% of
Allied Colloids BL06272AQ/Alcostat167, SD n° O~D045768, and pH 9-10).
The 400 and
200 cpsi monolith reached coatings of 2.7 and. 3.2 glin3 respectively in
fourteen
consecutive passes of zeolite 13X with very Iow percentages of binder (below
5%). A
5 polyelectrolyte layer was applied prior to the first pass and between the
11~' and the 13~'
passes.
EXAMP1:,E 4
Zeolite Y on Aluminium Sheet
An aluminium sheet was coated with zeolite Y (Zeolyst Int.) using a
polyelectrolyte aqueous solution (5% of Allied Colloids BL06272AQ/Alcostatl67,
SD
n°00045678, and pH 9-10). The aluminium plate was coated with a thin
layer of
polyelectrolyte, then three consecutive passes of zeolite Y were applied with
a total weight
IS gain of 0.81g over a surface of approximately 1.S:Sinz (10crn2); previous
tests using this
zeolite without polyelectrolyte showed that the coating would completely
disintegrate and
peel off after two passes.
EXAMPLE 5
Zeolite Y on Aluminium Monoliths
An aluminium honeycomb monolith of 200cpsi cell density was coated with
zeolite Y using a polyelectrolyte aqueous solution (5% of Allied Colloids
BL06272AQ/Alcostat167, SD n° 00045768, ands pH 9-10. A polyelectrolyte
layer was
applied prior to the first pass. The monolith reached coatings of 4.2g1in3 of
zeolite Y in
seven consecutive passes.
EXAMIPLE 6
Zeoiite 4A on "Fecra~lloy" static Miazers
Static mixers (obtainable from Sulzer) made of "Fecralloy" metal were pre-
heated
to 900°C for 1 hour and soaked in 5% wt Alcostati67 polyelectrolyte
solution (Allied
Colloids Ltd) at pH 9. The wet mixer is then dried to leave a thin surface
polyelectrolyte


CA 02353585 2001-06-O1
WO 00/32311
6
PCTlGB99/03858
coating. The mixer is then dipped in a slurry conl:aining 35wt% zeolite 4A
with Swt%
platinum, and 2wt% Ludoz silica (DuPont). Excess zeolite is removed by blowing
the
coated mixer through with 80psi of nitrogen. This helps to free any blocked
channels in
the mixer. The coated mixer is then dried at 120°C/8hrs, and calcined
at 500°C/2hrs. The
5 calcination step burns off the polyelectrolyte layer, and leaves the zeolite
coating intact.
In this case it results in a thick zeoiite layer with crating density of 3.l
ginch'3 throughout
the mixer.
E~L
IO Alumina -based Catalyst on "Fecrallov" static Mixers
A static mixer was coated, using the same methodology as in Example 6 with 5%
Pt, 0.1 %Fe on alumina catalyst. This catalyst was mixed with 7% Dispersal
binder
(Condea), and made into a 35wt% aqueous washG~at. The resultant coating was
observed
IS to have good cohesion and integrity. A coating density of 3.7ginch'3 was
achieved.
EXAMIPLE_8_
Zeolite H-ZSM-5 on Ceramic Monolith
20 A conventional cordierite monolith was ;successfully coated with H-ZSM-5
synthetic zeolite using the technique of Examplf; 3. The test was repeated
successfully
using a mixture of zeolite and colloidal silica binder.
The invention may be modified by the skilled person without departing from the
25 scope thereof.

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date Unavailable
(86) PCT Filing Date 1999-11-22
(87) PCT Publication Date 2000-06-08
(85) National Entry 2001-06-01
Examination Requested 2004-11-08
Dead Application 2007-11-22

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2003-11-24 FAILURE TO PAY APPLICATION MAINTENANCE FEE 2003-12-05
2006-11-22 FAILURE TO PAY APPLICATION MAINTENANCE FEE
2007-04-12 R30(2) - Failure to Respond
2007-04-12 R29 - Failure to Respond

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Application Fee $300.00 2001-06-01
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 2001-10-05
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 2 2001-11-22 $100.00 2001-10-31
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 3 2002-11-22 $100.00 2002-10-30
Reinstatement: Failure to Pay Application Maintenance Fees $200.00 2003-12-05
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 4 2003-11-24 $100.00 2003-12-05
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 5 2004-11-22 $200.00 2004-11-02
Request for Examination $800.00 2004-11-08
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 6 2005-11-22 $200.00 2005-11-01
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
JOHNSON MATTHEY PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY
Past Owners on Record
LANZUELA DE ALVARO, FRANCISCO
MALDE, CHANDRESH NEMCHAND
PETCH, MICHAEL IAN
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Representative Drawing 2001-09-18 1 39
Abstract 2001-06-01 1 55
Cover Page 2001-09-26 1 67
Description 2001-06-01 7 354
Claims 2001-06-01 1 36
Drawings 2001-06-01 1 102
Claims 2004-12-21 1 26
Correspondence 2001-08-16 1 24
Assignment 2001-06-01 2 132
PCT 2001-06-01 12 554
PCT 2001-07-30 1 64
Assignment 2001-10-05 2 90
Fees 2001-10-31 1 30
Fees 2003-12-05 1 36
Fees 2002-10-30 1 32
Fees 2004-11-02 1 27
Prosecution-Amendment 2004-11-08 1 27
Prosecution-Amendment 2004-12-21 11 362
Prosecution-Amendment 2004-12-21 3 59
Fees 2005-11-01 1 27
Prosecution-Amendment 2006-10-12 3 80