Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
CA 02353939 2001-06-05
WO 00/34200 PCT/US99/25603
LOW DUST WALL REPAIR COMPOUND
Field Of The Invention
The present invention relates generally to wall repair compounds such as joint
compounds, spackling compounds, and the like used to repair imperfections in
walls or fill
joints between adjacent wallboard panels. More particularly, the present
invention relates
to such a wall repair compound that includes an additive which reduces the
quantity of
airborne dust generated when the hardened compound is sanded.
Background Of The Invention
Interior walls of residential and commercial buildings are often constructed
using
gypsum wallboard panels, often referred to simply as "wallboard" or "drywall."
The
wallboard panels are attached to studs using nails or other fasteners, and the
joints between
adjacent wallboard panels are filled using a specially formulated adhesive
composition
called joint compound to conceal the joints. The procedure for concealing the
joint
between adjacent wallboards, and thereby producing a smooth seamless wall
surface,
typically includes applying soft wet joint compound within the joint or seam
formed by the
abutting edges of adjacent wallboard panels using a trowel or the like. A
fiberglass, cloth,
or paper reinforcing tape material is then embedded within the wet joint
compound, and the
compound is allowed to harden. After the joint compound has hardened, a second
layer of
joint compound is applied over the joint and tape to completely fill the joint
and provide a
smooth surface. This layer is also allowed to harden. Upon hardening, the
joint compound
is sanded smooth to eliminate surface irregularities. Paint or a wall
covering, such as wall
paper, can then be applied over the joint compound so that the joint and the
drywall
compound are imperceptible under the paint or wall covering. The same joint
compound
can also be used to conceal defects caused by the nails or screws used to
affix the
wallboard panels to the studs, or to repair other imperfections in the
wallboard panels, so as
to impart a continuously smooth appearance to the wall surface.
Various drywall joint compounds are known for concealing joints between
adjacent
wallboard panels. Conventional joint compounds typically include a filler
material and a
-1-
CA 02353939 2001-06-05
WO 00/34200 PCT/US99/25603
binder. Conventional fillers are calcium carbonate and calcium sulfate
dihydrate (gypsum),
which are used in "ready mixed" joint compounds, and calcium sulfate
hemihydrate (CaSO4
- '/zH20; also referred to as plaster of Paris or calcined gypsum), which is
used in "setting
type" joint compounds. Ready mixed joint compounds, which are also referred to
as pre-
mixed or drying type joint compounds, are pre-mixed with water during
manufacturing and
require little or no addition of water at the job site. Such joint compounds
harden when the
water evaporates and the compound dries. Setting type joint compounds, on the
other
hand, harden upon being mixed with water, thereby causing dihydrate crystals
to form and
interlock. Setting type joint compounds are therefore typically supplied to
the job site in
the form of a dry powder to which the user then adds a sufficient amount of
water to give
the compound a suitable consistency.
The Koltisko, Jr. et al. U.S. Patent No. 4,972,013 provides an example of a
ready-
mixed (wet) joint compound including a filler, binder, thickener, non-leveling
agent, and
water. The McInnis U.S. Patent No. 5,277,712 provides an example of a setting
(dry mix-
type) joint compound including a fine plaster material, such as stucco, a
material which
imparts internal strength and workability to the joint compound, such as
methyl cellulose,
and a material for retaining water, such as perlite. Additional examples of
joint cbmpounds
are provided in the Brown U.S. Patent No. 4,294,622; the Mudd U.S. Patent No.
4,370,167; the Williams U.S. Patent No. 4,454,267; the Struss et al. U.S.
Patent No.
4,686,253; the Attard et al. U.S. Patent No. 5,336,318; and the Patel U.S.
Patent No.
5,779,786.
A spackling compound is disclosed in the Deer et al. U.S. Patent No.
4,391,648.
While joint compound and spackling compound do many of the same things and are
both
smeared onto walls to hide flaws, spackling compound is generally lighter,
dries more
quickly, sands more easily, and is more expensive than joint compound. For
simplicity,
joint compound, drywall joint compound, and like expressions are used
throughout this
specification to refer to wall repair compounds generally, including joint
compound and
spackling compound.
Sanding hardened joint compound can be accomplished using conventional
techniques including power sanders, abrasive screens, or manual sahders which
consist
-2-
CA 02353939 2001-06-05
WO 00/34200 PCT/US99/25603
simply of a supporting block and a piece of abrasive paper mounted on the
block. Sanding
the joint compound, however, produces a large quantity of an extremely fine
powder which
tends to become suspended in air for a long period of time. The airborne
particles settle on
everything in the vicinity of the sanding site and usually require several
cleanings before
they can all be collected, thereby making cleanup a time consuming and tedious
process.
The particles may also present a serious health hazard to the worker.
The airborne particles are highly pervasive and can enter the nose, lungs,
eyes and
even the pores of the skin. Results from a study conducted by the National
Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health found that dust levels in 9 out of 10 test
samples taken at
test sites where workers were finishing drywall with joint compound were
higher than the
limits set by OSHA. The report also said that the dust may not be safe even
when it falls
within the recommended limits. In addition, the study found that several dust
samples
contained silica and kaolin, a material found in clay, which have been found
to cause
permanent lung damage. The report recommended the use of local exhaust
ventilation, wet
finishing techniques, and personal protective equipment to reduce the hazard.
In an effort to reduce the dust generation and cleanup problems associated
with the
sanding of conventional joint compounds, various attempts have been made to
develop
specialized dustless drywall sanders. The Matechuk U.S. Patent No. 4,782,632,
for
example, discloses a drywall sander including a sanding head designed to
minimize the
release of dust and further discloses attaching a vacuum cleaner to the
sanding head to
collect the dust. The Krumholz U.S. Patent No. 4,955,748 discloses a dustless
drywall
finisher which uses a wet sponge to prevent the formation of airborne dust.
Dust remains a problem, however, when conventional power sanders or hand
sanders are used to sand conventional joint compounds. A need therefore exists
for a joint
compound that can be sanded using conventional sanders without producing a
large
quantity of fine particles capable of becoming suspended in air. It would also
be desirable
to provide an additive that could be mixed with commercially available joint
compounds to
inhibit the formation of airborne particles during the sanding procedure
without otherwise
interfering with the properties of the joint compound.
-3-
CA 02353939 2001-06-05
WO 00/34200 PCT/US99/25603
Summarx Of The Invention
The present invention provides a wall repair compound, such as a joint
compound
or spackling compound which, when sanded, generates a lower lever of airborne
particles
than conventional joint compounds. More specifically, the present invention
provides a
wall repair compound which includes a dust reducing additive. Generally, the
wall repair or
joint compound includes a sufficient amount of the dust reducing additive so
that when the
joint compound is tested as described in this specification, it generates a
lower quantity of
airborne dust than the joint compound would produce if it did not contain the
dust reducing
additive.
The dust reducing additive can be pre-mixed into the wet joint compound prior
to
application or applied as a coating to the hardened joint compound after
application.
Generally, the dust reducing additive reduces the quantity of airborne dust
particles having
a size of less than or equal to 10 microns to less than 50% of the quantity
that would be
generated without the additive. In certain embodiments, the quantity of
airborne dust
particles is reduced by at least 75% compared to a mixture without the
additive. Most
preferably, the level of airborne dust is reduced by more than 90%. In one
embodiment, the
quantity of airborne particles generated by sanding the hardened joint
compound of the
present invention was less than 50 mg/m3 and, in certain other embodiments,
less than
about 15 mg/m3. The quantity of airborne particles generated by sanding the
hardened joint
compound is preferably less than 5 mg/m3.
It is desirable that the dust reducing additive serve to suppress the
formation of
airborne particles without significantly interfering with the desired
characteristics of the
joint compound. Suitable dust reducing additives include oils, such as mineral
oils,
vegetable oils and animal oils, surfactants, oleoresinous mixtures, pitch,
solvents, paraffins,
waxes, including natural and synthetic wax, glycols, and other petroleum
derivatives. Other
materials which do not fit within the above categories may also effectively
reduce the
quantity of dust generated by a joint compound.
The joint compound formulations include a conventional filler material and a
binder
material, such as a resin. The joint compound can also include a surfactant,
which may or
may not serve to suppress airborne dust formation, and a thickening agent.
Prior to
-4-
CA 02353939 2009-06-01
=60557-6528
hardening, the joint compound preferably includes a
sufficient amount of water to form a mud-like spreadable
material which can be applied to the wall surface. The
present invention further provides an additive which can be
admixed with conventional joint compounds to reduce the
quantity of dust generated during sanding. The dust
reducing additive can be used with both drying type (i.e.
ready mixed) or setting type joint compounds.
The present invention also provides a method of
reducing the quantity of airborne dust generated by sanding
a fully hardened joint compound which includes mixing a
sufficient quantity of a dust reducing additive with the
joint compound prior to applying the joint compound to a
wall surface.
It is also desirable that the present invention
provide a joint compound having good plasticity, water
retention, cohesiveness, viscosity stability, resistance to
cracking, sandability, minimal shrinkage, good paint
adherence, light weight, low cost, good hardening
properties, and other properties comparable to those offered
by conventional joint compounds.
According to one aspect of the present invention,
there is provided a wall repair compound for sanding smooth
when hardened comprising: a) from about 25% by weight to
about 95% by weight filler; b) from about 1% by weight to
about 2% by weight binder; c) water; and d) from about 0.1%
by weight to about 20% by weight dust reducing additive
selected from the group consisting of oil, wax, pitch,
oleoresinous mixtures, paraffin, aliphatic hydrocarbon,
propylene carbonate, glycerol, glycols, terpenes, a mixture
-5-
CA 02353939 2009-06-01
60557-6528
of wax and surfactant, a mixture of oil and surfactant, and
combinations thereof.
According to another aspect of the present
invention, there is provided a method of reducing the
quantity of dust generated while sanding a hardened
conventional drywall joint compound, said method comprising
mixing a dust reducing additive selected from the group
consisting of oil, wax, pitch, oleoresinous mixtures,
paraffin, aliphatic hydrocarbon, propylene carbonate,
glycerol, glycols, terpenes, a mixture of wax and
surfactant, a mixture of oil and surfactant, and
combinations thereof, with a joint compound prior to
applying the joint compound to a wall surface.
According to yet another aspect of the present
invention, there is provided a drywall joint compound
comprising: a) from about 25% by weight to about 95% by
weight filler selected from the group consisting of calcium
carbonate, calcium sulfate dihydrate, and calcium sulfate
hemihydrate; b) from about 1% by weight to about 20% by
weight binder; c) water; and d) oil, wax, pitch,
oleoresinous mixture, paraffin, aliphatic hydrocarbon,
heptane, isopropanol, propylene carbonate, glycol, glycerol,
terpene, a mixture of wax and surfactant, a mixture of oil
and surfactant, and combinations thereof.
According to a further aspect of the present
invention, there is provided a method of using a drywall
joint compound, the method comprising: a. applying a joint
compound to a joint between adjacent wallboard panels, the
joint compound comprising: i) from about 1% by weight to
about 20% by weight binder, ii) from about 25% by weight to
about 95% by weight filler, iii) water, and iv) from about
1% by weight to about 20% by weight of a dust reducing
-5a-
CA 02353939 2008-07-28
6C)557-6528
additive selected from the group consisting of wax, oil,
paraffin, aliphatic hydrocarbon, propylene carbonate,
glycerol, terpene, oleoresinous mixture, pitch, glycol, a
mixture of wax and surfactant, a mixture of oil and
surfactant, and combinations thereof; b. allowing the
compound to dry to a hardened state; and c. sanding the
hardened composition to a smooth finish.
-5b-
CA 02353939 2008-07-28
60557-6528
These and other features and advantages of the invention will be apparent to
those
skilled in the art when considered in view of the following detailed
description.
Brief Description of the Drawing
Fig. 1 is a perspective view of the testing enclosure used to measure the
quantity of
airborne dust generated by sanding the wall repair compounds of the present
invention.
Detailed Description
According to the present invention, there are provided compositions suitable
for
filling and repairing cracks, holes, or other imperfections in a wall surface,
such as the joints
between adjacent wallboard panels. The compositions of the present invention
include a
dust reducing additive combined with conventional wall repair compound
materials
including a filler and a binder to form a low dust wall repair compound. Dust
reducing
additive refers to any ingredient capable of preventing, minimizing,
suppressing, reducing,
or inhibiting the formation of particles capable of becoming airborne. The
expressions
-5c-
CA 02353939 2008-07-28
60557-6528
"airborne particles" or "airborne dust particles" refer to fine particles
generated during the
sanding or abrading of the compound which are capable of being carried by or
through the
air. Wall repair compound refers generally to compositions useful for filling
and repairing
cracks, holes, and other imperfections in surfaces such as drywall, wood,
plaster, and
masonry. Wall repair compounds include interior finishing and patch compounds
such as
joint compound, spackling compound, wood fillers, plasters, stucco, and the
like. The joint
compound can also include a thickener, and other materials found in
conventional joint
compounds.
Any conventional filler material can be used in the present invention.
Suitable fillers
include calcium carbonate (CaCO3) and calcium sulfate dihydrate (CaSO4 - 2H20
commonly referred to as gypsum) for ready mixed type joint compounds, and
calcium
sulfate hemihydrate (CaSOa -'/z H20) for setting type joint compounds. The
joint
compound can also include one or more secondary fillers such as glass micro
bubbles, mica,
pei-lite, talc, liniestone, pyropliyllite, silica, and diatuinaceuus earth.
The filler generally
1.5 comprises from about 25% to about 95% of the weight of the joint compound
based on the
total wet weight of the formulation (i.e. including water). More preferably,
the filler
corriprises from about 55% to about 75% of the total wet weight, and most
preferably,
from about 60% to about 70%.
Another ingredient usually present in joint compounds is a binder or resin.
Suitable
binders include polyvinyl acetate, polyvinyl alcohol, ethylene vinyl acetate
co-polymer,
vinylacrylic co-polymer, styrenebutadiene, polyacrylamide, other acrylic
polymers, other
latex emulsions, natural and synthetic starch, and casein. These binders can
be used alone
or in combination with one another. The amount of binder can range from about
1% to
abolut 45% of the joint compound total wet weight. More preferably, the binder
comprises
from about 1% to about 20% of the total wet weight, and most preferably, from
about 4%
to about 14%. Preferred binders are Rhoplex HG 74M 2m and Rhoplex AC 417M"'
acrylic
copolymers available from Rohm and Haas, Philadelphia, PA.
A surfactant can also be included in the joint compound formulation,
particularly
when the dust reducing additive includes an oil. Certain surfactants have also
been found
to act as dust reducing additives by themselves. A preferred surfactant is
Triton X-40551, a
-6-
CA 02353939 2008-07-28
60557-6528
nonionic surfactant available from Union Carbide Chemicals and Plastics Co.
lnc., Danbury,
CT. The surfactant generally comprises less than about 3.5% of the joint
compound total
wet weight, and preferably less than about 0.25%.
Many joint compound formulations also contain a cellulosic thickener, usually
a
cellulosic ether. Suitable thickeners include metliyl cellulose, hydroxypropyl
cellulose,
hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose, hydroxyethyl cellulose, hydroxyethyl methyl
cellulose,
hydroxyethyl hydroxypropyl cellulose, ethylhydroxyethyl cellulose, and sodium
carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC). These thickeners can be used alone or in
combination
witti one another. The amount of cellulosic thickener can range from about 0.1
% to about
2% by weight of the joint compound. A preferred thickener is hydroxypropyl
methyl
cellulose available from Dow Chemical Company under the trade designation
Methocel ~
Another ingredient that can be included in the joint compound of the invention
is a
non-leveling agent. Suitable non-leveling agents include clays such as
attapulgus clay,
bentonite, illite, kaolin and sepiolite, and clays mixed with starches.
Thickeners, such as
those described above, can also function as non-leveling agents.
To provide a lighter weight joint compound, glass bubbles or a specially
treated
expanded perlite can be added as described in U.S. Patent No. 4,454,267.
Additional
ingredients which can be utilized in the joint compound are preservatives,
fungicides, anti-
freeze, wetting agents, defoamers, flocculents, such as polyacrylamide resin,
and
plasticizers, such as dipropylene glycol dibenzoate.
In accordance with a characterizing feature of the present invention, the
joint
conipound includes an ingredient which serves to minimize the quantity of
airborne
particles generated during sanding of the hardened joint compound. The
additive generally
comprises less than 20% of the joint compound total wet weight. More
preferably, the dust
reducing additive comprises between about 0.1 % and about 10% of the joint
compound by
wet weight percent and, most preferably, between about 1.5% and about 6%.
Many ingredients have been found to effectively reduce the quantity of
airborne
particles generated when sanding the joint compound including oils such as
animal,
vegetable, and mineral oils (saturated and unsaturated), and oils derived from
petroleum,
pitch, natural and synthetic waxes, paraffins, solvents which evaporate slower
than water,
-7-
CA 02353939 2001-06-05
WO 00/34200 PCT/US99/25603
terpenes, glycols, surfactants, and mixtures thereof. A preferred dust
reducing additive is a
niixture of mineral oil and an unsaturated oil, such as corn oil, comprising
from about 1.5%
to about 6% of the joint compound total wet weight, and a surfactant
comprising from
about 0.15% to about 0.40% of the joint compound total wet weight. It has also
been
found that increasing the level of resin in the joint compound may serve to
reduce the level
of airborne dust generated during sanding.
While the manner by which each additive serves to suppress the formation of
particles
capable of becoming airborne is not fully understood, some general
observations have been
made. For example, it was observed that the joint compounds containing a dust
reducing
additive seemed to produce particles which were larger and heavier than the
particles
produced by joint compounds without a dust reducing additive. Thus, the dust
reducing
additive may cause the dust particles to agglomerate or stick together,
thereby forming
large heavy particles which tend not to become or remain airborne. The
invention,
however, is not intended to be limited to any particular mechanism.
The relative quantity of the various ingredients can vary substantially in
accordance
with the invention. Table 1 shows the general range of each ingredient for
either a setting
type joint compound or a ready-mixed type joint compound in its wet condition:
TABLE I
Percent by Weight (Wet)
Filler 25-95%
Binder 1-45%
Thickener <2%
Water 2-45%
Dust Reducing Additive <20%
TEST PROCEDURE
The test procedure for measuring the quantity of airborne particles generated
when
sanding the hardened joint compound was as follows. First, each test specimen
was
prepared according to a specific formulation. The specific formulations for
the various
joint compounds are described more fully below along with the method used to
prepare the
-8-
CA 02353939 2008-07-28
60557-6528
specimens. The test specimens were approximately five inches long, one and one-
half
inches wide, and one quarter of an inch thick (5" by 1'/z" by 1/4 "). Before
sanding, each
test specimen was allowed to completely harden for at least twenty four hours
at room
temperature in an environment where the relative humidity generally ranged
from about
25 io to about 75%.
Referring to Fig. 1, there is shown the test enclosure 2 that was used to sand
the test
specimens 4a, 4b, 4c and measure the quantity of airborne dust particles
generated. The
enclosure 2 was a rectangular box six feet high, four feet wide, and two feet
wide (6'x 4'x
2'). The top 6, bottom 8, side 10, and rear walls 12 of the enclosure 2 were
constructed of
wood, and the front wall 14 was constructed of transparent Plexiglas. A
generally
triangular access opening 16 located about one foot above the bottom wall 8
was provided
in the front wall 14 to allow the individual conducting the test to insert his
or her hand and
arin into the euc;lusure and sand the specimen. The access opening 16 had a
base dimension
of about 7'/2 inches and a lieight of about 8'/~ inches. A movable cover
member 18 was
provided to allow the enclosure 2 to be completely sealed when sanding was
completed.
To sand the specimens 4a, 4b, 4c, the cover 18 was arranged in its up position
as shown by
the solid lines in Fig. 1. When sanding was completed, the cover 18 was
pivoted
downwardly to completely cover the access opening 16 as shown in phantom 18'.
As shown, three specimens 4a, 4b, 4c of joint compound were prepared on a
section
of Nvallboard 20 and the section of wallboard 20 was clamped to a mounting
block 22
arranged within the enclosure 2. When tested, the specimens were located about
twelve
inches above the bottom wall 8 of the enclosure. Each specimen was tested
individually
and after each test, the enclosure was cleaned so that the quantity of
airborne dust particles
measured less than 0.5 mg/m3. A particle counter 24 for measuring the quantity
of airborne
particles was mounted in the right side wall about forty eight inches above
the center of the
specimens 4a, 4b, and 4c.
The test specimens were sanded using a. model B04552 power palm sander Im
available
froin Makita Corporation of America, Buford, Georgia. The sander included a
4'/2 x 4
inch pad equipped with a 120 grit mesh sanding screen mounted over a 5 x 3'/2
x 3/4 inch
open, senii-rigid, non-woven, heavy duty, stripping, backing pad available
from Minnesota
-9-
CA 02353939 2008-07-28
60557-6528
Mining and Manufacturing Company, St. Paul. Minnesota. Sanding was performed
at a
sanding speed of approximately 14,000 OPM (orbits per minute) using ordinary
sanding
pressure. Ordinary sanding pressure is defined as the amount of pressure
typically required
to sand a hardened joint compound. Sanding pressure, therefore, is the manual
pressure
typically applied by an ordinary person when sanding a joint compound. It will
be
recognized that the sanding pressure can vary depending on the hardness of the
joint
compound. Sanding was continued until the specimen was completely sanded. That
is, the
entire thickness of the specimen was sanded so that a generally smooth wall
surface was
produced. Care was taken to ensure that sanding was discontinued before the
drywall itself
was sanded. The amount of time required to sand each specimen varied depending
on the
hardness of the joint compound and the sanding pressure.
The quantity of airborne dust particles was measured starting from the time
sanding
was initiated until several minutes after sanding was discontinued. In
general, the level of
airborne dust was measured until the level decreasecl to less than 50% of its
peak level.
The quantity of airborne dust was measured using a DUSTTRAKTM aerosol monitor
model
8520 available from TSI Incorporated, St. Paul, MN. The particle counter
measures the
nuntber of particles having a size of less than or equal to 10 microns. In the
Examples, the
peak or highest level of airborne dust measured during the test is presented.
INGREDIENTS
A summary of the various ingredients used to prepare the joint compounds in
each of
the Examples is provided below:
Fillers
Calcium Carbonate - Marble Dust nt available from ECC International,
Sylacauga, Alabama.
Calcium Sulfate Dihydrate - available from J.T. Baker Chemical Co.,
Phillipsburg, New
Jersey.
-10-
CA 02353939 2008-07-28
60557-6528
Mica - Mica AMC TM available from Kraft Chemical Co., Melrose Park, Illinois.
Mica
prevents cracks from forming as the joint compound hardens.
Kaolin - Aldrich Chemical Co., Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Glass Bubbles - Kl (177 microns - 0.14 g/cm3) glass bubbles available from
Minnesota
Mining and Manufacturing Company, St. Paul., Minnesota. Glass bubbles improve
the
sandability of the joint compound and help to form a lighter weight joint
compound.
Binders
Rhoplex HG 74MTM, Rhoplex HG 74PTM, Rhoplex AC 417MTM, Rhoplex 2620TM, and
Rhoplex EC 2848TM - acrylic resins available from Rohm & Haas, Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania.
Airflex RP-226 Im - vinyl acetate-ethylene copolymer available from Air
Products and
Chemicals, Inc., Allentown, Pennsylvania.
Waxes
Octowax 321 available from Tiarco Chemical Div., Textile Robber & Chemical
Co.,
Dalton, Georgia.
Boler 1070'~ - a paraffin wax available from Boler Inc., Wayne Pennsylvania.
Carbowax 540 synthetic wax available from Union Carbide Corp., Danbury,
Connecticut.
Oils
Corn Oil - conventional corn oil. A suitable corn oil is available from
Eastman Kodak Co.,
Rochester, New York.
Linoleic Acid - an unsaturated oil, available from Eastman Kodak Co.,
Rochester, New
York.
-11-
CA 02353939 2008-07-28
60557-6528
Castor Oil - an unsaturated vegetable oil available from Aldrich Chemical Co.,
Milwaukee,
Wisconsin.
Tung Oil - an unsaturated vegetable oil available from Woodworkers Store,
Medina,
Minnesota.
Mineral Oil - Carnation light mineral oil available from Witco Corporation,
Sonneborn
Division, New York, New York.
Surfactants
Surfactants were generally included in the joint compound formulations when
the dust
reducing additive included an oil to help emulsify the oil and combine it with
a water based
joint compound. Certain surfactants, however, were found to have a dust
reducing effect
when used by themselves.
FC 430'% - a nonionic surfactant available from Minnesota Mining and
Manufacturing
Company, Industrial Chemicals, St. Paul, Minnesota.
Triton X-405I - a nonionic surfactant (octylphenoxy polyethoxy ethanol)
available from
Union Carbide Chemicals and Plastics Co. Inc., Danbury, Connecticut.
Variquat B-200 T" - a cationic surfactant (benzyl trimethyl ammonium chloride
60%) available
from Sherex Chemical Co. Inc., Dublin, Ohio.
Steol KS 460' - an anionic surfactant (alkyl ether sulfate sodium salt 60%)
available from
Stephon Chemical Co., Northfield, Illinois.
Span 8501 - a nonionic surfactant (sorbitan trioleate) available from ICI
Americas Inc.,
Wilmington, Delaware.
-12-
CA 02353939 2008-07-28
60557-6528
Tween 80'K - nonionic surfactant (polysorbate 80) available from ICI Americas
Inc.,
Wilmington, Delaware.
Solvents
Isopar M an aliphatic hydrocarbon available ffom Exxon Chemical Co., Houston,
Texas.
Norpar 15 - a normal paraffin available fronl Exxon Chemical Co., Houston,
Texas.
Heptane - available from Aldrich Chemical Co, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Isopropanol - available from Aldrich Chemical Co, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Propylene carbonate - available from Arco Chemical Co., Newton Square,
Pennsylvania,
under the trade designation Arconate HP
Tripropylene glycol methyl ether available from Dow Chemical Co., Midland,
Michigan.
Tripropylene glycol-n-butyl ether available from Dow Chemical Co., Midland,
Michigan.
Ethylene glycol phenyl ether available from Dow Chemical Co., Midland,
Michigan.
D. Limonene - a terpene available from SCM Glidden Organics, Jacksonville,
Florida.
Exxsol D-1 10 an aliphatic hydrocarbon available from Exxon Chemical Co.,
Houston,
Texas.
Exxate 1300'~ - C13 alkyl acetate available from Exxon Chemical Co., Houston,
Texas.
Glycerol - available from J.T. Baker Chemical Co, Phillipsburg, New Jersey.
-13-
CA 02353939 2008-07-28
60557-6528
Thickener
Methocel 311 TM - hydroxypropyl methylcellulose available from Dow Chemical
Co., Midland,
Michigan.
Examples
The invention is illustrated by the follovring examples which present various
embodiments of the invention. In general, the joint compounds were prepared
by: (1)
mixing the water and thickener, if any, with the binder; (2) adding the dust
reducing
additive; and (3) adding the fillers, mixing continuously. If the formulation
contained a dust
reducing additive in the form of an oil and a surfactant, the surfactant was
typically added
before the oil. More specific procedures used to prepare certain joint
compound
formulations are described more fully below.
Table 2 presents the test results for a w-itrol joint compound formulation
which did
nut cotttairt a dust reducing additive, along with the formulation and test
results for
Examples 1- 3, each of which contained a dust reducing additive in the form of
a wax.
Each formulation is presented by wet weight percent of each ingredient, that
is, including
water.
TABLE 2 - WAXES
Formulations by Wet Weight Percent
Ingredient Control 1 2 3
Calcium carbonate 64_3 61.24 44.0 63.34
Mica 2.7
Kaolin 1.0 2.1 1.04
Glass Bubbles 4.7 6.0 1.73
Rho lex AC 417 M 10.1 9.8 17.0
Airtlex RP-226 5.23
Triton X-405 0.13 0.2 0.16
Stearic Acid 0.75
28% Ammonium Hydroxide 0.38
Water 19.9 16.9 24.17 24.87
Octowax 321 7.13
Boler 1070 7.5
Carbowax 540 3.63
Airborne Dust 72 m m 28 m m3 3.5 m m 5 m m3
Drying Time I day I day 1 day
1 da
-14-
CA 02353939 2001-06-05
WO 00/34200 PCT/US99/25603
The control formulation included a binder (Rhoplex AC 417 M), fillers (calcium
carbonate,
kaolin, and glass bubbles), and water. After being allowed to dry for one day,
the specimen
having the control formulation was sanded and found to produce a peak quantity
of
airborne dust particles having a size of less than or equal to 10 microns of
72 mg/m3. In
Example 1, the formulation includes approximately 7% by weight wax (Octowax
321)
which reduced the quantity of airborne dust to 28 mg/m3. In Example 2, the
secondary
fillers mica and kaolin have been replaced by glass bubbles, and a paraffin
wax (Boler 321)
was added. The quantity of dust generated by the resulting formulation was
reduced to 3.5
mg/m3-
The forrnulation of Example 2 was prepared by combining the wax and stearic
acid
and heating them to 170 F until a clear liquid was formed. Approximately half
of the
water was then heated to 170 F and added to the ammonium hydroxide. The wax-
stearic
acid mixture was then combined with the water-ammonium hydroxide mixture, and
this
mixture was cooled to room temperature while mixing continuously. In turn, the
Rhoplex
AC 417M, the Triton X-405, the remaining quantity of water, the calcium
carbonate, and
the glass bubbles were added and mixed to produce a uniform mixture.
The joint compound formulation in Example 3 contains a vinyl acetate binder
(Airllex
RP-226) and a wax (Carbowax 540 - polyethylene glycol). This joint compound
formulation exhibited a dust level of 5 mg/m3. Carbowax is synthetic wax which
is soluble
or miscible in water. While paraffins and Carbowax are both considered waxes,
they are
believed to represent dissimilar waxes.
Table 3A presents the formulations and test results for Examples 4-9, each of
which
contains one oil and a surfactant which serve to suppress the formation of
airborne dust
particles during sanding.
-15-
CA 02353939 2001-06-05
WO 00/34200 PCT/US99/25603
TABLE 3A - OILS
Formulations by Wet Wei ht Percent
In redient 4 5 6 7 8 9
Calcium Carbonate 54.94 54.72 54.72 55.15 56.41 56.6
Glass Bubbles 8.9 10.8 10.8 8.55 8.25 6.32
Rho lex AC 417M 15.63 15.57 15.57 15.69 25.77 26.31
Triton X-405 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.21 0.21
Water 15.5 15.44 15.44 15.56 6.19 6.32
Corn oil 4.64
Linoleic acid 3.08 3.08
Castor oil 4.66
Mineral oil 3.17
Tung oil 4.24
Airbome Dust 2.3 m rn' 3.5 m m' 45 m m' 2.5 mg/m' 7 m m' 13 m m'
Drying Time 1 day 1 day 30 days 2 days 1 da 2 days
In each example, the oil significantly reduced the quantity of airborne
particles produced
during sanding. It will be noted that Examples 5 and 6 had similar
formulations. In
Example 5, however, the specimen was permitted to dry for only 1 day and in
Example 6,
the specimen was permitted to dry for 30 days. By increasing the drying time
from 1 day to
30 days, the quantity of airborne dust generated having a size less than or
equal to 10
microns increased from 3.5 to 45 mg/m3. It has generally been observed that
unsaturated
oils, such as unsaturated vegetable oils and linoleic acid, reduce the
quantity of airborne
particles generated after a short drying time (e.g. 1 day) without
significantly affecting the
adhesive properties of the joint compound. In addition, the joint compound can
be sanded
quite easily. After an extended drying time (e.g. 30 days), however, it has
been observed
that the joint compound becomes more difficult to sand and the quantity of
airborne dust
particles increases.
As shown in Example 8, mineral oil by itself was also found to significantly
reduce
airborne dust levels after a short drying time. In addition, mineral oil has
been found to
reduce airborne dust levels over an extended period of time. Mineral oil,
however, was
found to adversely affect the adhesive properties of the joint compound.
Table 3B presents the formulations and test results for Examples 10-15, each
of
which includes a dust reducing additive comprising a mixture of corn oil and
mineral oil,
and a surfactant. In each Example, the mineral oil and corn oil were premixed.
-16-
CA 02353939 2001-06-05
WO 00/34200 PCT/US99/25603
TABLE 3B - OIL MIXTLTRES
Formulations by Wet Wei ht Percent
Ingredient 10 11 12 13 14 15
Calcium Carbonate 68.65 63.69 63.69 58.07 61.05 61.05
Glass Bubbles 4.8 4.8 5.0 5.25 5.25
Mica 3.0
Kaolin 2.4 0.99 0.99 3.0 3.0
Rho lex AC 417M 11.0 9.9 9.9
Rho lex HG 74M 15.13 11.0 11.0
Triton X-405 0.15 0.15 0.15
Vari uat B-200 0.20
Steol KS-460 0.20
FC 430 0.15
Methocel 311 0.14
Water 11.3 15.5 15.5 18.01 17.0 17.0
Corn oil 0.5 0.99 0.99 0.5 0.5 0.5
Minerat oil 3.0 3.98 3.98 3.0 2.0 2.0
Airborne Dust 5 m m' 1.5 mg/m' 5.5 m m' 2.5 m m' 10 m m' 7 m m'
Diying Time 1 da 1 day 19 days 4 days 4 days
4 da s
The combination of mineral oil and an unsaturated oil, such as linoleic acid
or corn oil
which contains some linoleic acid, was found to be a low dust additive that
did not
significantly adversely affect the adhesive properties of the joint compound
and also
reduced airborne dust levels over an extended period of time.
Examples 11 and 12 have similar formulations but in Example 12, the drying
time
was increased to 19 days. As shown, the quantity of dust generated after 19
days increased
only slightly. Thus, the dust reducing capability of the corn oil - mineral
oil mixture
remained much more stable over time than the formulations including linoleic
acid
presented in Examples 5 and 6.
Example 13 shows that significant dust reduction is also achieved when using a
combination additive of corn oil and mineral oil in a joint compound that
contains a
thickener (i.e. Methocel 311). Example 13 was prepared by premixing the
Methocel 311
with the water until a clear liquid was formed. The surfactant FC 430 and
resin Rhoplex
HG 74M were then added. Next, the mineral oil and corn oil were premixed and
added to
the other ingredients, mixing continuously. The calcium carbonate and glass
bubbles were
then added.
-17-
CA 02353939 2001-06-05
WO 00/34200 PCT/US99/25603
The formulations of the joint compounds in Examples 14 and 15 were similar but
Example 14 included a cationic surfactant (Variquat B-200) and Example 15
included an
anionic surfactant (Steol KS-460). In both examples, the niixture of corn oil
and mineral
oil together with the surfactant significantly reduced the quantity of
airborne dust
generated.
Tables 4A and 4B present the formulations and test results for Examples 16-28.
These examples demonstrate the dust reducing effect of various solvents.
TABLE 4A - SOLVENTS
Formulation by Wet Wei ht Percent
Ingredient 16 17 18 19 20 21
Calcium Carbonate 61.18 69.69 63.12 60.18 48.90 60.49
Glass Bubbles 3.81 2.97 3.62 3.91 7.96 6.03
Kaolin 1.0
Rhoplex AC 417 13.09 10.22 12.44 13.43 30.8
Rho lex HG 74M 12.0
Triton X-405 0.24 0.19 0.22 0.25 0.15
FC 430 0.12
Water 18.02 14.07 17.12 18.48 7.7 16.86
Propylene carbonate 3.66
Triro lene glycol methyl ether 2.86
Tri m lene glycol-n butyl ether 3.48
Ethylene glycol phenyl ether 3.75
D. limonene 4.52
Glycerol 3.47
Airborae Dust 14 7.5 3.5 4.5 5 mg/m' 19.5
m m? m m3 m m3 m m3 m m3
Drying Time 2 days 3 days 2 days 2 days 1 day
1 da
-18-
CA 02353939 2001-06-05
WO 00/34200 PCTIUS99/25603
TABLE 4B - SOLVENTS
Formulations by Wet Wei ht Percent
Ingredient 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Calcium carbonate 69.95 69.95 68.31 68.31 70.69 68.65 69.95
Mica 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Kaolin 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4
Glass Bubbles 3.1 3.1 2.86
Rho lex AC 417 M 7.0 7.0 10.6 10.6 9.82 11.0 7.0
Triton X-405 0.15 0.15 0.19 0.19 0.18 0.15 0.15
Water 14.0 14.0 14.6 14.6 13.5 11.3 14.0
Heptane 3.5
Iso ro ol 3.5
Iso ar M 3.2 3.2
Norpar 15 2.95
Exxsol D-110 3.5
Exxate 1300 3.5
Airborne Dust 105 160 7.5 110 27 15 12.8
m m' m' m m' m m' m m' m m' m'
D'n Time 1 day 1 da I day 5 days 5 days 1 day 1 day
As shown in Examples 22 and 23, not all solvents are effective at reducing the
quantity of
airborne dust. In addition, Examples 24 and 25 demonstrate that an additive
may be
effective at reducing the quantity of dust generated for a given period of
time, but that the
level of dust will increase over time as the additive evaporates. Such a
formulation may be
desirable since the additive, depending on its volatility, can provide dust
reduction for a
predetermined period of time but will dissipate from the joint compound,
thereby leaving a
joint compound having properties similar to joint compounds without any dust
reducing
additive.
Table 5 presents the test results for Examples 29-33 which show the level of
airborne
dust generated by formulations containing different surfactants.
-19-
CA 02353939 2001-06-05
WO 00/34200 PCT/US99/25603
TABLE5-SURFACTANTS
Formulations by Wet Weight Percent
Ingredient 29 30 31 32 33
Calcium Carbonate 63.91 61.05 61.05 62.98 62.57
Kaolin 3.0 3.0 1.03 1.03
Glass Bubbles 5.01 5.25 5.25 4.02 4.61
Rh lex HG 74M 11.03 11.0 11.0 11.35 11.28
Water 17.04 17.0 17.0 17.53 17.43
Triton X-405 3.01
Variguat B-200 2.7
Steol KS-460 2.7
Span 85 3.09
Tween 80 3.08
Airborne Dust 65 m m' 63 m m' 42 m m' 10 m m' 8.5 m m'
Drying Time 1 day 4 days 4 days 5 days 5 days
It will be noted that in Examples 29-33, the percentage of surfactant added to
the
joint compound formulations was significantly greater than the quantity used
to emulsify
the oil in Examples 4-15 which ranged from 0.15 to 0.39 percent by weight. In
Example
29, the nonionic surfactant Triton X-405 was found to only slightly reduce the
quantity of
airborne dust compared to the control formulation. Similarly, in Example 30,
the cationic
surfactant Variquat B-200 was found to slightly reduce the quantity of
airborne dust. In
Example 31, the anionic surfactant Steol KS-460 was found to moderately reduce
the
quantity of airborne dust. It was noted that each of the surfactants in
Examples 29-31 was
initially solid materials which had to be solubilized in water.
In Examples 32 and 33, the surfactants were liquids which did not dry easily.
In
Example 32, the nonionic surfactant Span 85, which is insoluble in water and
has an HLB
of 1.8, was found to have a significant dust reducing effect. In Example 33,
Tween 80,
which is soluble in water and has an HLB of 15, was found to have a
significant dust
reducing effect. It was therefore observed from Examples 32 and 33 that liquid
surfactants
which do not dry quickly may themselves serve as effective dust reducing
additives.
Table 6A presents the formulations and test results of Examples 34-36 which
show
the effect that different resins had on dust generation.
-20-
CA 02353939 2001-06-05
WO 00/34200 PCT/US99/25603
TABLE 6A - DIFFERENT RESINS
Formulations by Wet
Weight Percent
Ingredient 34 35 36
Calcium Carbonate 63.45 64.05 62.23
Kaolin 1.0 1.0 2.91
Glass Bubbles 5.5 4.9 5.10
Triton X-405 0.45 0.15 0.15
Water 19.6 19.8 16.5
Rho lex AC 417M 10.0
Rho lex HG 74M 10.1 10.68
Corn oil 0.49
Mineral oil 1.94
Airborne Dust 51 m m' 81 m ml 7 m m'
Drying Time 1 day Iday 1 day
Examples 34 and 35 show that Rhoplex AC 417M, a softer resin than Rhoplex HG
74M,
may slightly reduce the level of airborne dust. In Example 36, when a dust
reducing
additive in the form of a corn oil mineral oil mixture was added, the level of
dust generated
was reduced significantly.
Table 6B presents the formulations and test results for Examples 37-39 which
contained a high level of resin.
TABLE 6B - HIGH RESIN LEVELS
Formulations by Wet Weight
Percent
Ingredient 37 38 39
Calcium Carbonate 58.29 61.02 59.61
Kaolin 0.96 1.01 1.02
Glass Bubbles 5.6 1.11 3.41
Triton X-405 0.15 0.16 0.15
Rho lex HG 74M 35.0
Rhoplex 2620 36.7
Rhoplex EC-2848 35.81
Airborne Dust 30 m m 6 m m 6.5 m m
D'n Time 1 day 1 day 1 day
* test discontinued prior to complete sanding of specimen
-21-
CA 02353939 2008-07-28
60557-6528
In each formulation, the quantity of resin was at least 35% by weight. While
each of the
resins included approximately 50% by weight water, it will be noted that no
additional
water was added to any of the joint compound formulations. Rhoplex HG 74M is a
harder
resin than Rhoplex 2620 and EC-2848. The quantity of airborne dust generated
for the
formulations in Examples 37-39 was found to be less than the quantity of
airborne dust
generated by the control joint compound formulation in Table 2, but the
formulations in
Examples 37-39 were found to have objectionable sanding properties. During the
testing
of the specimens of Examples 38 and 39, only half of the specimen could be
sanded due to
the rubbery nature of the joint compound.
Table 6C presents the formulations and test results for joint compounds
containing a
vinyl acetate binder (Airflex RP-226). The control formulation contains a
small quantity of
surfactant which may serve to slightly reduce dust generation but is otherwise
free of a dust
reducing additive. Example 40 contains a dust reducing additive in the form of
a mixture of
corn oil and mineral oi[ which was found to significantly reduce the quantity
of dust
generated.
TABLE 6C - VINYL ACETATE BINDER
Formulations by
Wet Wei ht Percent
Ingredient Control 40
Calcium Carbonatc 63.01 62.87
Kaolin 1.03 1.03
Glass Bubbles 2.07 2.45
Triton X-405 0.15 0.15
Water 28.54 24.7
Airtlex RP-226 5.2 5.19
Corn Oil 0.52
Mineral Oil 3.09
Airborne Dust 84 m m 3 m m
D n Time 1 day 1 day
Table 7 presents the results for tests conducted by applying the dust reducing
additive
as a coating to a fully hardened joint compound. In each test, a specimen
formed of Light
Weight All Purpose Joint Compound'm available from United States Gypsum Co.,
Chicago,
Illinois was prepared and allowed to harden for 4 days. The hardened joint
compound was
-22-
CA 02353939 2001-06-05
WO 00/34200 PCT/US99/25603
then saturated with the dust reducing additive and allowed to dry for an
additional period
of time, either 7 hours or 24 hours. The specimens were then sanded. It was
found that
when applied as a coating, the dust reducing additive served to significantly
reduce the
quantity of airborne dust particles generated by the joint compound.
TABLE 7- DUST REDUCING ADDITIVE APPLIED AS A COATING
Ezzsol D 110 Isopar M
Airborne Dust 4 mg/m 7.5 mgf m
(Dried 7 hours)
Airborne Dust 4 mg/m 27 mg/m
(Dried 24 hours
Table 8 presents the formulations and test results for joint compound
formulations
containing a calcium sulfate dihydrate filler material. In Example 41, a
significant reduction
in airborne dust generation was achieved by including a dust reducing additive
comprising a
mixture of surfactant, corn oil, and mineral oil in the joint compound.
TABLE 8- CALCIUM SULFATE DIHYDRATE FILLER
Formulations by
Wet Wei ht Percent
Ingredient Control 41
Calcium Sulfate Dihydrate 70.36 66.6
Rhoplex HG 74M 8.64 9.7
Water 21 19.3
Triton X-405 0.2
Corn oil 0.7
Mineral oil 3.5
Airborne Dust 225 m m 20 m m
Drying Time 1 da 1 day
Table 9 presents test results obtained using several commercially available
joint
compounds.
-23-
CA 02353939 2008-07-28
60557-6528
TABLE 9
CONVENTIONAL JOINT COMPOUNDS - NO ADDITIVE
Conventional Joint Compound Airborne Dust D in Time
All Pu se Joint Com undl 100 m m' 3 days
Light weight All Purpose Joint Com und TM 155 m m3 3 days
Gold Bond Pro Form Prof. Lite Joint Compound 90 m m' 4 days
Easy Sand 90 Setting Joint Compound TM 280 m m3 3 days
The first three joint compounds are ready-mixed type joint compounds
manufactured and
S marketed by United States Gypsum Co., Chicago, Illinois, and Easy Sand 90 is
a setting
type joint compound manufactured by National Gypsum Co., Charlotte, North
Carolina.
Table 10 shows the effect of adding a dust reducing additive to the
conventional joint
compounds of Table 9.
TAiiLE 10
CONVENTIONAL JOINT COMPOUND WITH ADDITIVE
Formulations by Wet Weight Percent
Ingredient All Purpose Joint Light weight All Gold Bond Pro Easy Sand 90
Compound Purpose Joint Formula Setting Joint
Compound Professional Lite Compound
Joint Compound
Joint Compound 96.35 96.35 96.35 67.74
Corn oil 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.51
Mineral oil 3.0 3.0 3.0 4.1
Triton X-405 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15
Water 27.5
Airborne Dust 2 m m3 12 m m' 5 m m3 13 m m3
Drying Time 3 days 1 day 1 day 2 days
In each case, a premixed dust reducing additive including corn oil, nuneral
oil, and
the surfactant Triton X-405 was added to each of the conventional joint
compounds just
prior to preparing the specimens, thereby serving to significantly reduce the
quantity of
airborne dust generated by sanding the hardened joint compound.
Table 11 presents the results obtained when a conventional spackling compound,
also referred to as a wall repair compound, was tested.
-24-
CA 02353939 2008-07-28
60557-6528
TABLE 11 - SPACKLING COMPOUND
Control 42
Spakfast 100 95.35
Corn oil 0.5
Mineral oil 4.0
Triton X-405 0.15
Airborne Dust 11 m m3 3 m rn3
Spakfast gm is a wall repair compound available from Minnesota Mining and
Manufacturing Company, St. Paul, Minnesota. Spakfast contains a high level of
resin and
exhibits a relatively low level of airborne dust. The level of airborne dust
generated,
however, was found to be significantly reduced when a dust reducing additive
including
corn oil, mincral oil, and a surfactant was added to the Spakfast formulation.
Thus,
according to the present invention, a dust reducing additive can be added to a
conventional
spackling compound to significantly reduce the quantity of airborne dust
generated by the
spackling compound.
While the formulations of each example has been presented in terms of the
weight
percent of each ingredient, it will be recognized that the formulations can
also be presented
in terms of the volume percent of each ingredient_ By way of example, Table 12
presents
two representative formulations in terms of both percent by weight and percent
by volume.
TABLE 12 - FORMULATION IN WEIGHT VOLUME PERCENT
Formulation I Formulation 2
Ingredient % by Wt % by Vol % by Wt % by Vol
Calcium Carbonate 62.23 25.66 54.73 14.82
Glass Bubbles 5.10 40.55 10.8 59.12
Kaolin 2.91 1.47 1 0.34
Rho lcx HG 74P 10.68 10.8 15.57 11.69
Triton X-405 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.11
Water 16.5 18.37 15.25 11.68
Corn oil 0.49 0.60 0.5 0.42
Mineral oil 1.94 2.40 2 1.82
Since glass bubbles have a low density and calcium carbonate has a high
density, the
percentage of glass bubbles increases significaritly while the percentage of
calcium
-25-
CA 02353939 2008-07-28
60557-6528
carbonate decreases significantly when converting the formulation from one
based on
weight to one based on volume.
It will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that various changes
and
modifications may be made without deviating from the inventive concept set
forth above.
Thus, the scope of the present invention should not be limited to the
structures described.in
this application, but only by the structures described by the language of the
claims and the
equivalents of those structures.
-26-
