Language selection

Search

Patent 2370966 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2370966
(54) English Title: REDUCTION OF OZONE IN AN ENCLOSED ENVIRONMENT
(54) French Title: REDUCTION DE L'OZONE DANS UN ENVIRONNEMENT CLOS
Status: Dead
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • B01D 53/66 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • MAXWELL, STUART (United Kingdom)
  • SENNETT, MERVYN NAPOLEON (United Kingdom)
  • MOULTON, JONATHAN PAUL (United Kingdom)
(73) Owners :
  • ATMOSPHERIC SOLUTIONS LIMITED (United Kingdom)
(71) Applicants :
  • ATMOSPHERIC SOLUTIONS LIMITED (United Kingdom)
(74) Agent: OSLER, HOSKIN & HARCOURT LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(86) PCT Filing Date: 2000-06-08
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 2000-12-14
Examination requested: 2005-02-02
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/GB2000/002230
(87) International Publication Number: WO2000/074820
(85) National Entry: 2001-12-07

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
9913357.1 United Kingdom 1999-06-09

Abstracts

English Abstract




In an enclosed environment subject to increased levels of ozone caused, for
example by electrostatic equipment such as laser printers and photocopiers,
the levels of ozone are reduced by releasing vapour from a terpenoid or a
mixture of terpenoids into the environment at a controlled rate. In one aspect
the vapour is released from an emission element of absorbent material
impregnated with the or each terpenoid compound and located within a container
which in use allows free circulation into the environment. The
absorbent/emission characteristics of the absorbent material are selected to
provide an extended release of the terpenoid or terpenoids into the
environment.


French Abstract

Dans un environnement clos sujet à des taux accrus d'ozone provoqués, par exemple, par des équipements électrostatiques tels que des imprimantes laser ou des photocopieuses, les taux d'ozone sont abaissés par libération, à un taux régulé, de vapeur d'un terpénoïde ou d'un mélange de terpénoïdes dans l'environnement. Dans un des modes de réalisation, la vapeur est libérée par un élément d'émission d'une matière absorbante imprégnée du ou de chaque composé terpénoïde, qui est placé à l'intérieur d'un récipient qui, lorsqu'il fonctionne, permet la libre circulation dans l'environnement. Les caractéristiques d'absorption/émission de la matière absorbante sont choisies de sorte à permettre une libération étendue du terpénoïde ou des terpénoïdes dans l'environnement.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.



18
CLAIMS
1. A method of reducing the level of ozone in a generally
enclosed environment, which comprises releasing vapour from
a terpenoid or a mixture of terpenoids into the environment
at a controlled rate.
2. A method according to Claim 1, which comprises
releasing the terpenoid vapour at a rate of between 90 and
120mg per hour.
3. A method according to Claim 1 or Claim 2, which
comprises releasing the terpenoid vapour at a rate of
between 60 and 100mg per hour.
4. A method according to any of the preceding Claims,
which comprises releasing the terpenoid vapour at a rate of
about 80mg per hour.
5. A method according to any of the preceding claims,
wherein said terpenoid vapour is released by evaporation
from an emission element.
6. A method according to Claim 5 wherein said terpenoid
vapour is released by evaporation from an emission element
at normal room temperature (17° C to 25° C).
7. A method according to Claim 5 or 6 wherein said
emission element is exposed to natural, unforced
ventilation.


19
8. A method according to any of Claims 5 to 7 wherein
said emission element is located in a container
configurable between an open position, in which the element
is exposed to the ambient atmosphere and a closed position
in which said element is generally enclosed within a
housing.
9. A method according to any of claims 5 to 8 wherein
said emission element is a porous synthetic polymer
element.
10. A method according to Claim 8 wherein said synthetic
polymer element is produced by moulding and/or sintering a
starting material comprising a synthetic thermo-plastic
polymer in particulate form.
11. A method according to Claim 10 wherein the starting
material is a high density polyethylene.
12. A method according to Claim 9 or Claim 10, in which at
least 80o by weight of the particles have a particle size
within the range of from 1 to 500 micron.
13. A method according to any of Claims 5 to 12, wherein
said emission element, before absorption of said terpenoid,
weighs from 5 to 15 grams.
14. A method according to Claim 13 wherein the emission
element contains between 10 and 20 grams of terpenoid
liquid.


20
15. A method according to Claim 13, wherein the emission
element contains about 15 grams of terpenoid liquid.
16. A method according to any of Claims 5 to 15 wherein
the void volume of the emission element is in the range of
from 25% to 70% of the volume of the emission element.
17. A method according to Claim 16, wherein the void
volume of the emission element is between 30% and 55%.
18. A method according to any of the preceding Claims
wherein the average pore size of the emission element is
between 10 and 100 microns.
19. A method according to any of the preceding Claims
wherein the or each terpenoid comprises a terpene or a
carotenoid.
20. A method as claimed in any of the preceding Claims,
wherein the terpenoid, or at least one of the terpenoids
comprises an essential oil.
21. A method according to any of the preceding claims,
wherein the terpenoid compounds or mixture thereof is
selected from the group comprising lavender oil, orange
oil, grapefruit oil, lime oil, myrtle oil, coriander oil,
tea tree oil, elecampane oil, juniper oil, dill oil, lemon
oil, elemi oil, spanish sage oil, cypress oil, pine needle
oil, lemon balm (melissa) oil, nutmeg oil, ylang ylang oil,
basil oil, grapeseed oil, .alpha. phellandrene, .alpha. humulene, a


21
terpinene, limonene, .alpha. pinene, .beta. caryophyllene, linalool,
linalyl acetate.
22. A method according to any of the preceding Claims,
wherein the flash point of the or each terpenoid is at
least 60°C.
23. Use of at least one of lavender oil, orange oil,
grapefruit oil, lime oil, myrtle oil, coriander oil, tea
tree oil, elecampane oil, juniper oil, dill oil, lemon oil,
elemi oil, spanish sage oil, cypress oil, pine needle oil,
lemon balm (melissa) oil, nutmeg oil, ylang ylang oil,
basil oil, grapeseed oil, .alpha., phellandrine, a humulene, .alpha.
terpinene, limonene, .alpha. pinene, .beta. caryophyllene, linalool,
linalyl acetate, or myrcene for the removal of ozone in a
generally enclosed environment.
24. Apparatus for removing ozone in a generally enclosed
environment, said apparatus comprising an emission element
of absorbent material impregnated with at least one
terpenoid compound located within a container which in use
allows free circulation of vapour into said environment.
25. Apparatus according to Claim 24, wherein said
container is reconfigurable between an open operational
configuration, in which vapour evaporating from said
emission element may dissipate into said environment, and a


22
closed configuration in which said emission element is
enclosed.
26. Apparatus according to Claim 24 or Claim 25, wherein
said container comprises an inner housing having perforate
walls, said inner housing being movably mounted with
respect to an outer housing.
27. Apparatus according to any of Claims 24 to 26, wherein
said emission element comprises a porous polymer substrate
impregnated with said terpenoid compound.
28. Apparatus according to any of Claims 24 to 27, wherein
said terpenoid compound comprises linalool.
29. Apparatus according to any of Claims 24 to 28 wherein
said emission element contains between 10 and 20 grams of
linalool.
30. Apparatus according to any of Claims 24 to 29, wherein
said emission element has a void volume of between 25% and
70% and an average pore size of between 10 and 100 microns.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.



CA 02370966 2001-12-07
WO 00/74820 PCT/GB00/02230
1
Reduction of Ozone in an Enclosed Environment
This invention relates to the reduction of ozone in an
enclosed environment.
The rising number of asthma sufferers in the Western
World and in particular in the United Kingdom is a matter
of great concern and much research has been done to
understand both the causes of the disease and the
mechanisms which trigger the onset of an attack.
It is known from published papers by RB Devlin et al
("Health Effects of Ozone", Science and Medicine, May/June
1997, pages 8 to 17) and by N A Molfino et al ("Effect of
Low Concentrations of Ozone on Inhaled Allergen Responses
in Asthmatic Subjects", The Lancet, Volume 338, No. 8761,
27 July 1991, pages 199 to 203) that relatively low levels
of ozone, similar to those commonly occurring in urban
areas, can increase the likelihood of asthma attacks.
Ozone occurs naturally and can for example be caused
by thunder storms. Ozone is also created by ultraviolet
light. Further, in an office environment levels of ozone
can rise significantly due to the ozone produced by
electrostatic printing equipment such as laser printers and
photocopiers.
The problem of reducing the level of ozone produced by
apparatus such as a photocopier or laser printer has been


CA 02370966 2001-12-07
WO 00/74820 PCT/GB00/02230
2
addressed in US 4,853,735. It has been recognised that
such devices are a principle source of ozone in an office
environment and thus this document attempts to deal with
the problem by reducing the level of ozone near the source
i.e. within the apparatus. In order to achieve this a
volatile ozone removing agent comprising a mixture of a
terpenoid and a glycol family material is used. An ozone
removing device is located within the photocopier machine
and is designed to provide a controlled flow rate of ozone
removing agent. With this arrangement, there are several
disadvantages. Firstly the location of the ozone removing
agent within the confines of the photocopier means that it
will be subject to temperature ranges well outside the
normal range of room temperatures and so the evaporation
rates will vary accordingly. Another difficulty is that
the ozone removing device is a fixture to the photocopier
and so will tend to be regarded as a replaceable item for
the photocopier, which will require installation, and the
device will be priced accordingly. Furthermore, the device
requires the use of glycol which is a corrosive material.
In addition, ozone is a naturally unstable compound and so,
outside working hours, the ozone levels in a room will fall
to a baseline level, and thus any evaporation of ozone
reducing agent outside working hours is effectively wasted.


CA 02370966 2001-12-07
WO 00/74820 PCT/GB00/02230
3
US Patent 5,567,416 discloses a slow-volatizing
terpenoid composition comprising a mixture of a terpenoid
and an anti-oxidant absorbed into a polymeric network
material. There are several difficulties associated with
this proposal; the substance involved has a relatively low
boiling point and uses an additive to raise the flash point
of the composition. The additive is
dichloropentafluoropropane (HCFC225) which is thought by
some to be environmentally undesirable. Furthermore the
composition includes an anti-oxidant which is intended to
prevent oxidation of the limonene. Since ozone is a
powerful oxidizing agent, it is believed that this anti-
oxidant may inhibit the reaction of the terpene with ozone.
US Patent 5,256,377 describes an ozone removing device
which again is primarily for use in photocopiers. A
terpenoid is absorbed onto a support material and subjected
to forced ventilation by means of a fan at the outlet of a
photocopier.
Japanese Patent Documents JP 1310366, JP 2090184 and
JP 62155927 each disclose arrangements in which an ozone
removing device is located in or adjacent the exhaust duct
of a photocopier.
Accordingly, it is an aim of this invention to provide
a passive method and apparatus for controlling the level of


CA 02370966 2001-12-07
WO 00/74820 PCT/GB00/02230
4
ozone in a room or other generally enclosed environment
which does not rely on heating or forced ventilation and
furthermore which provides a controlled release of ozone
reducing agent at a rate commensurate with maintaining the
ozone levels in a room housing a photocopier and/or a laser
printer at acceptable levels, without requiring the use of
potentially harmful additives, so as to make effective use
of the ozone reducing agent to provide an extended ozone-
reducing effect.
Accordingly, in one aspect, this invention provides a
method of reducing the level of ozone in a generally
enclosed environment, which comprises releasing vapour from
a terpenoid or a mixture of terpenoids into the environment
at a controlled rate.
In studies conducted by the Applicants it has been
found that a useful control effect is achieved by releasing
the terpenoid vapour at a rate of between 40 and 120mg per
hour, more preferably between 60 and 100mg per hour, and
ideally about 80mg per hour. The Applicants have
determined that a room may be dosed with terpenoid
compounds at a required given evaporation rate by careful
balancing of the emission characteristics of the support
(e. g. void volume, pore size, particulate size etc.) with
the evaporation characteristics of the terpenoid compound


CA 02370966 2001-12-07
WO 00/74820 PCT/GB00/02230
(determined by, e.g. the boiling point temperature) and the
amount of terpenoid to be stored. Thus in one preferred
example linalool is impregnated into an emission element of
Vyon E grade material, and, for the size of emission
5 element used an emission rate of about 80 mg/hour is
achieved. More volatile compounds (i.e. with lower boiling
points) would need to be used with a less emissive
material.
It is preferred for said terpenoid vapour to be
released by evaporation from an emission element of
absorbent material. The evaporation preferably takes place
at normal room temperature (17° C to 25° C) (i.e. no heating
is required), such that the evaporation rate, and thus
working life of the emission element can be predicted.
Likewise evaporation and permeation of the vapour
throughout the generally enclosed environment preferably
occurs in natural, unforced ventilation (i.e. no fan or
confining duct is used).
Preferably said emission element is located in a
container configurable between an open position, in which
the element is exposed to the ambient atmosphere and a
closed position in which said element is generally enclosed
within a housing.


CA 02370966 2001-12-07
WO 00/74820 PCT/GB00/02230
6
Preferably the emission element comprises a porous
synthetic polymer structure. The polymer lattice may
conveniently be produced by moulding and/or sintering a
starting material comprising a synthetic thermo-plastic
polymer in particulate form.
In one embodiment, the starting material is a high
density polyethylene in which at least 80o by weight of the
particles have a particle size within the range of from 1
to 500 micron.
Naturally the size and weight of the emission element
depend at least partly on the size of the room to be
treated, the volatility of the absorbed liquid and the
porosity of the element. In one example said emission
element, before absorption of said terpenoid, may typically
weigh from 5 to 15 grams. The emission element preferably
contains between 10 and 20 grams of terpenoid liquid, and
ideally about 15 grams thereof.
The void volume of the emission element may
conveniently lie in the range of from 25o to 70o and more
preferably between 30o and 550. In a particular example,
the average pore size of the emission element is between 10
and 100 microns.
Preferably the or each terpenoid comprises a terpene
or a carotenoid. At least one of the terpenoid compounds


CA 02370966 2001-12-07
WO 00/74820 PCT/GB00/02230
7
preferably comprises a compound extracted from a plant, or
a synthesised compound corresponding to a constituent of a
plant extract. Plant extracts that we have found to be
suitable are lavender oil, orange oil, grapefruit oil, lime
oil, myrtle oil, coriander oil, tea tree oil, elecampane
oil, juniper oil, dill oil, lemon oil, elemi oil, spanish
sage oil, cypress oil, pine needle oil, lemon balm
(melissa) oil, nutmeg oil, ylang ylang oil, basil oil,
grapeseed oil, whilst suitable natural or synthesised
compounds comprise a phellandrene, a humulene, a terpinene,
limonene, a pinene, (3 caryophyllene, linalool, linalyl
acetate, and myrcene.
To enhance safety without requiring the use of
modifiers etc., the flash point of the terpenoid compound
is preferably greater than 60° C.
Of the compounds set out above we have found linalool
to be particularly effective in terms of reaction with
ozone and a sustained evaporation rate.
In another aspect, this invention provides the use of
at least one of lavender oil, orange oil, grapefruit oil,
lime oil, myrtle oil, coriander oil, tea tree oil,
elecampane oil, juniper oil, dill oil, lemon oil, elemi
oil, spanish sage oil, cypress oil, pine needle oil, lemon
balm (melissa) oil, nutmeg oil, ylang ylang oil, basil oil,


CA 02370966 2001-12-07
WO 00/74820 PCT/GB00/02230
8
grapeseed oil, a phellandrine, a, humulene, a, terpinene,
limonene, a pinene, (3 caryophyllene, linalool, linalyl
acetate, or myrcene for the removal of ozone in a generally
enclosed environment.
In another aspect, this invention provides apparatus
for removing ozone in a generally enclosed environment,
said apparatus comprising an emission element of absorbent
material impregnated with at least one terpenoid compound
located within a container which in use allows free
circulation of vapour into said environment.
Preferably said container is reconfigurable between an
open operational configuration, in which vapour evaporating
from said emission element may dissipate into said
environment, and a closed configuration in which said
emission element is enclosed.
Advantageously, said container comprises an inner
housing having perforate walls, said inner housing being
movably mounted with respect to an outer housing.
Preferably said emission element comprises a porous polymer
substrate impregnated with a terpenoid compound. Said
terpenoid compound may advantageously comprise linalool,
preferably without additives. Preferably said emission
element contains between 10 and 20 grams of linalool.
Preferably said emission element has a void volume of


CA 02370966 2001-12-07
WO 00/74820 PCT/GB00/02230
9
between 25° and 70o and an average pore size of between 10
and 100 microns.
Whilst the invention has been described above it
extends to any inventive combination of the features set
out above or in the following description.
The invention may be performed in various ways, and an
embodiment thereof and certain test results will now be
described in detail, reference being made to the
accompanying drawings, in which:-
Figure 1 is a front plan view of an ozone removing
apparatus in accordance with the invention, in an open
position;
Figure 2 is a side view, taken on the left hand side
of the apparatus of Figure 1;
Figure 3 is a graph showing the decay of the
concentration of ozone in a closed environment (i)
naturally and (ii) when an ozone reducing device in
accordance with this invention is present, and
Figure 4(a) to 4(d) are comparative graphs showing the
build up of ozone in a closed environment containing an
ozone generator (i) with natural decay only (ii) with a
first example of this invention and (iii) with a second
example of this invention, after 72, 96, 120 and 168 hours
respectively.


CA 02370966 2001-12-07
WO 00/74820 PCT/GB00/02230
Referring to Figures 1 and 2, a dispenser comprises a
perforated housing 10 containing an emission disk or
element 12 made of a sheet of an absorbent porous polymer
lattice structure available under the Trade Name Vyon Grade
5 E from Porvair Zimited, Norfolk, UK. The disk was
approximately 90mm in diameter, 5mm thick, and weighed
approximately 10 grams. The emission element 12 was left
to stand in a dish of a terpenoid (in this example
linalool) until saturated. The emission element took up
10 about 15 grams of linalool. The porosity of the support
was selected having regard to the volatility of the
linalool so that, under normal room temperature conditions,
with natural ventilation, the emission element emitted
about 80mg of linalool per hour. This gave a theoretical
maximum life of 187.5 hours which is equivalent to
approximately one month of working hours in a typical
office room containing a photocopier.
The perforated housing 10 is pivotally mounted within
an outer, imperforate housing 14 having a pivotal
attachment, so that the apparatus can be moved between an
open position (as shown in Figure 1) and a closed position
in which the container is enclosed substantially wholly
within the housing 14 thus preventing release of the
linalool.


CA 02370966 2001-12-07
WO 00/74820 PCT/GB00/02230
11
Referring now to Figure 3, this is a graph showing the
natural decay rate of ozone and the decay rate with a
product in accordance with the invention. In this instance
the product included a rectangular emission element of Vyon
F material, of 90mm x 70mm and 9.75mm thickness,
impregnated with about 15 grams of linalool. It will be
seen that the time taken for the ozone concentration to
reduce naturally to 50 ppb is over 1000 seconds, whereas
with the example of the invention the ozone concentration
reduces to 50 ppb in about 260 seconds.
Referring now to Figures 4a to 4d, these are graphs
showing the ozone concentration or build up in a closed
test environment when an ozone generator is turned on. On
each graph there are three traces; the ozone concentration
without any ozone removing agent, and the ozone
concentration with two examples of the invention (Vyon E#1
and Vyon E#2). In addition to this, the sequence of
Figures 4(a) to 4(d) show the characteristics of two
examples of the invention after 72, 96, 120 and 168 hours
respectively. The examples of the invention comprised Vyon
E grade disks 90mm in diameter and 4.75 mm thick, with an
original impregnation of about l5gms of linalool. These
graphs show individually that the examples of the invention
maintain the ozone concentration at a peak level of below


CA 02370966 2001-12-07
WO 00/74820 PCT/GB00/02230
12
about 75 ppb and generally at about 50 ppb or lower,
whereas without the ozone-removing devices the ozone
concentration would reach over 200 ppb. The graphs as a
set show that the examples of the invention retain their
ozone-removing effect substantially unchanged for at least
168 hours. Assuming that the devices are closed outside
working hours and that there is no significant evaporation
when closed, this means that the examples will continue to
be highly effective for at least 21 working days.
As noted above the apparatus emits linalool vapour at
a rate of about 80mg per hour, (when the device is open).
This emission rate is substantially constant over the life
of the pad. Our studies have shown that, in a typical
office environment including a photocopier and a laser jet,
about lOmg of ozone may be produced per hour. Given the
relative molecular weights of linalool and ozone, 32mg of
linalool per hour would be required, assuming that each
molecule of linalool reacted with an ozone molecule. In
practice an excess of linalool is required and for this
purpose a factor of between 2 and 3 has been found to work
reasonably well. Accordingly it has been found that an
evaporation rate of linalool of between 60 to 100mg per
hour provides good performance.


CA 02370966 2001-12-07
WO 00/74820 PCT/GB00/02230
13
These emission rates, together with the sustained
extended emission life achieved through careful matching of
the properties of the oil with the emission element,
provide a particularly effective solution to the problem of
maintaining low ozone levels in an office environment.
Furthermore, the active agent in the material can be
derived from natural sources or be a synthetic derivation
thereof, and so is environmentally friendly without
requiring additives, which may themselves be seen as
environmentally unfriendly, or other substances which may
add to the material or manufacturing cost of the device.
Whilst the above embodiment uses linalool on a
absorbent pad of Vyon E material, it will of course be
appreciated that other terpenoids may be used with other
emission elements.
The tables below illustrate the terpenoid compounds
which have been tested for their effectiveness in carrying
out the present invention. In Table 1, the compounds are
shown ranked in order of reactivity, showing the time taken
to reduce the concentration of ozone in a standard test
atmosphere (100ppb ozone) to 500 of the standard
concentration (t100-50) and to 200 of the standard
concentration (t100-20).


CA 02370966 2001-12-07
WO 00/74820 PCT/GB00/02230
14
The tests were carried out with a grade of Vyon
material which emitted at a higher rate than Vyon 'E',
initially impregnated with 5m1 of linalool, but the results
are a good illustration of the relative performance of the
substances.


CA 02370966 2001-12-07
WO 00/74820 PCT/GB00/02230
TABLE 1
Essential Oil and Chemical RcactivitX
essential Oil/Chemicalt100-50 (sec) t100-20 (sec)


Tangerine 112 226


Myrcene 122 261


Mandarin 122 28U


Limonene 131 292


Fir needle 132 336


Melissa 163 407


Carrot seed 169 404


Linalool 185 387


Bay 195 526


Dill seed 195 S87


Myrtle 200 506


Fennel 201 449


Ravensara 239 567


May Chang 250 524


Inula 260 544


Petitgrain 265 647


Cajcput 276 723


(3-pinene 288 653


Coriander 292 571


Manuka 320 756


Clary Sage 320 714


Ho Wood 325 866


Eucalyptus 328 664


Spearmint 329 776


Citronella 330 > 1000


(3-Caryophyllene 344 645




CA 02370966 2001-12-07
WO 00/74820 PCT/GB00/02230
16
TABLE 1 (cont.l)
Sage 350 >1000


1'eppcnnint 352 730


Ginger 3S4 814


Niaouli 359 741


Lynalyl acetate 375 736


Myrrh 384 839


Palma.rosa 388 892


Spanish sage 392 >1000


Thyme 392 > 1000


Geraniol 399 > l 000


Valerian 407 785


Cardamon 409 992


Oregano 423 954


Patchouli 460 > 1000


Friars Balsam 468 > 1000


Terpineol 474


Nerol 486 >1000


Ciruiamon 503 >1000


Citronellol 530 > 1000


YlangYlangExtra 531 >1000


Geranium 538 > 1000


Ylang Ylang 539 >1000


Cedar Wood 539 >1000


Jasmine S84 >1000


Amyris 628 >I000


Citral 647 > 1000


Soya 667 >1000


Farnesol 669 > 1000


Coconut 673 >1000


Hop Oil 688 >1000




CA 02370966 2001-12-07
WO 00/74820 PCT/GB00/02230
17
TABLE 1 (cont.2)
Oleic acid 688 >1000


Cartot tissue 691 > 1000


Almond Oil 731 >1000


Clove bud 738 >1000


1-iypericum 741 > 1000


Hop l;xtract 742 >1000


Calendula 749 > 1000


Borage 768 =1000


Sunflower 771 > 1000


Apricot Kcmal 784 >1000


Rosehip 796 >1000


Grape Seed 808 >1000


Evening Primrose 813 >1000


Clove Stcm 827 >1000


Peach Kernal 831 > 1000


Rapeseed 841 >1000


Teak 844 >1000


Jojoba 915 >1000


4-allyl anisole 925 >1000


Vetiver 934 >1000


Wheatgenn 943 >1000


Avocado 1002 >1000




Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 2370966 was not found.

Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date Unavailable
(86) PCT Filing Date 2000-06-08
(87) PCT Publication Date 2000-12-14
(85) National Entry 2001-12-07
Examination Requested 2005-02-02
Dead Application 2008-06-09

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2007-06-08 FAILURE TO PAY APPLICATION MAINTENANCE FEE
2007-08-22 R30(2) - Failure to Respond

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Application Fee $300.00 2001-12-07
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 2 2002-06-10 $100.00 2002-06-06
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 2002-07-04
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 3 2003-06-09 $100.00 2003-06-02
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 4 2004-06-08 $100.00 2004-06-08
Request for Examination $800.00 2005-02-02
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 5 2005-06-08 $200.00 2005-05-27
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 6 2006-06-08 $200.00 2006-06-01
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
ATMOSPHERIC SOLUTIONS LIMITED
Past Owners on Record
MAXWELL, STUART
MOULTON, JONATHAN PAUL
SENNETT, MERVYN NAPOLEON
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Abstract 2001-12-07 1 60
Claims 2001-12-07 5 138
Drawings 2001-12-07 6 84
Description 2001-12-07 17 505
Cover Page 2002-05-28 1 33
PCT 2001-12-07 8 334
Assignment 2001-12-07 2 118
Correspondence 2002-05-24 1 24
Assignment 2002-07-04 3 102
Fees 2003-06-02 1 42
Fees 2002-06-06 1 57
Fees 2004-06-08 1 44
Prosecution-Amendment 2005-02-02 1 41
Fees 2005-05-27 1 43
Prosecution-Amendment 2006-01-11 2 52
Fees 2006-06-01 1 40
Prosecution-Amendment 2007-02-22 3 135