Language selection

Search

Patent 2373462 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2373462
(54) English Title: COURSE-HOLDING, HIGH-SPEED, SEA-GOING VESSEL HAVING A HULL WHICH IS OPTIMIZED FOR A RUDDER PROPELLER
(54) French Title: BATEAU RAPIDE ALLANT EN MER ET A STABILITE DE ROUTE, A COQUE OPTIMISEE POUR UNE HELICE DE GOUVERNAIL
Status: Dead
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • B63H 23/24 (2006.01)
  • B63B 1/04 (2006.01)
  • B63H 1/12 (2006.01)
  • B63H 5/08 (2006.01)
  • B63H 5/125 (2006.01)
  • B63H 5/16 (2006.01)
  • B63H 21/22 (2006.01)
  • B63H 5/10 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • TIGGES, KAY (Germany)
  • ANDERSEN, PETER (Germany)
  • HENRIKSEN, BJOERN A. (Norway)
(73) Owners :
  • SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT (Germany)
  • SEA TRADE AS (Norway)
(71) Applicants :
  • SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT (Germany)
  • SEA TRADE AS (Norway)
(74) Agent: FETHERSTONHAUGH & CO.
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(86) PCT Filing Date: 2000-05-10
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 2000-11-16
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/DE2000/001454
(87) International Publication Number: WO2000/068072
(85) National Entry: 2001-11-13

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
PCT/DE99/01422 Germany 1999-05-11
199 28 961.1 Germany 1999-06-24
PCT/DE99/01842 Germany 1999-06-24
299 13 498.9 Germany 1999-08-03
200 03 451.0 Germany 2000-02-25
PCT/DE00/00537 Germany 2000-02-25

Abstracts

English Abstract




The invention relates to a course-stable, fast, seagoing ship comprising a
hull that is optimized for a rudder propeller. The inventive ship has a hull
designated for accommodating cargo or passengers and has at least one
rotatable, preferably electric rudder propeller (POD) (6) which is arranged
under the hull of the ship in a gondola-like manner and which comprises at
least one motor generator unit for supplying power. Said motor generator unit
is arranged in the hull of the ship, whereby the hull of the ship has, at
least in part, a bottom (11) which slopes upward approximately to both sides
of the hull. The front portion of the hull is designed to stabilize the course
and movement of the ship and terminates underwater, in particular, with a
relatively narrow bow (2) comprising a bulb (3). In addition, a flow guide
body (skeg) (8) which is provided for optimizing the maneuverability
characteristics as well as for optimizing the flow against the rudder
propeller (6) is arranged in front of each rudder propeller. Said flow guide
body has a volume of displacement for the water flowing against the respective
rudder propeller.


French Abstract

L'invention concerne un bateau rapide allant en mer, à stabilité de route, dont la coque est déterminée pour recevoir des charges utiles ou des passagers et comprend au moins une hélice de gouvernail (POD) (6) rotative, de préférence électrique, montée en fuseau sous la coque, qui présente au moins une unité moteur-générateur pour assurer l'alimentation en énergie. La coque du bateau présente au moins en partie un fond (11) ascendant quelque peu en direction des deux côtés de la coque. La partie avant de la coque se présente de manière à assurer la stabilité de la course et du mouvement du bateau et se termine sous l'eau, notamment en une étrave relativement effilée avec un bulbe (3) d'étrave. Il est prévu devant chaque hélice de gouvernail un corps de guidage de l'écoulement (crosse) (8), tant pour optimiser les propriétés de route, que pour optimiser l'afflux au niveau de l'hélice du gouvernail, qui présente un volume de déplacement pour l'eau affluant sur chacune des hélices du gouvernail (6).

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.



-11-

claims

1. A course-holding, high-speed, sea-going vessel
having a hull which is intended to hold payloads or
passengers and at least one rotatable, preferably
electric, rudder propeller (POD) which is arranged
gondola-like under the hull of the vessel and has, to
supply it with power, at least one motor/generator unit
which is arranged in the hull of the vessel,
characterized in that the hull of the vessel mainly has
a bottom which rises over a small angle toward the two
sides of the hull, and in that the front part of the
hull is designed so as to stabilize the course and
movement of the vessel and ends under water, in a long
stretched-out bow with a bulb, and in that it has two
rudder propellers, a flow-guiding element (skegg) being
arranged upstream of each rudder propeller in order
both to optimize the handling characteristics and to
achieve an optimized flow against the rudder propeller,
which has a displacement volume for the water flowing
against the respective rudder propeller.

2. The vessel as claimed in claim 1, characterized
in that the lower part of the bow following the bulb is
designed with a concave profile.

3. The vessel as claimed in claim 1 or 2,
characterized in that the flow-guiding elements
(skeggs) are hook-shaped at the end in the longitudinal
direction, their design is matched to the specific type
of vessel and they have an outgoing flow characteristic
which, with a flow bearing against the skegg, gives
rise to a decelerated flow against the rudder propeller
unit.

4. The vessel as claimed in claim 1, 2 or 3,
characterized in that the flow-guiding elements
(skeggs) are arranged bent toward the outside on the


-12-

bottom of the vessel, the angle being between 3° and
10°.

5. The vessel as claimed in claim 1, 2, 3 or 4,
characterized in that the rudder propellers are
arranged inclined toward the outside, approximately
perpendicular with respect to the bottom of the vessel
which rises by a small angle to the two sides of the
vessel, for example inclined by 4° to 5°.

6. The vessel as claimed in claim 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5,
characterized in that the zero position of the rudder
propeller is selected so as to deviate from the
longitudinal direction of the vessel in such a way that
a flow channel which widens is produced between the
rudder propellers.

7. The vessel as claimed in claim 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 or
6, characterized in that the axes of rotation of the
rudder propellers are aligned so as to rise toward the
stern.

8. The vessel as claimed in claim 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
or 7, characterized in that the flow-guiding elements
(skeggs), the lower part of the hull and the bow are
designed in terms of shape and length so as to bring
about a straight course of the vessel when the flow
bears against it.

9. The vessel as claimed in claim 1, 2, 3, 4, 5,
6, 7 or 8, characterized in that the flow-guiding
elements (skeggs) form an integral part of the hull,
the dimensioning parameters being as follows:

- skegg width in the range 0.1 to 0.06 of the width
of the vessel

- skegg depth in the range 1.0 to 0.74 of the draft
of the vessel

- offset of the center of the skegg with respect to
the center of the vessel equal to the distance
between the associated propeller shaft and the
center of the vessel



-13-

- length of the skegg in the range 0.38 to 0.25 of
the length of the water line at the designed
draft, for example approximately 0.30 to 0.35 of
the length of the water line at the designed
draft.

10. The vessel as claimed in one or more of the
preceding claims, characterized in that the skeggs are
designed as front vanes for the respective rudder
propeller so that the effectiveness of small rudder
angles is amplified.

11. The vessel as claimed in one or more of the
preceding claims, characterized in that each rudder
propeller has two individual propellers, in particular
unidirectional propellers.

12. The vessel as claimed in one or more of the
preceding claims, characterized in that the propellers
are arranged in a directional overall outgoing flow of
the rear of the vessel, which outgoing flow is
decelerated in the vicinity of the rudder propellers
and is oriented by the skeggs to produce low-loss flow
against the rudder propellers.

13. The vessel as claimed in one or more of the
preceding claims, characterized in that the hull is
designed such that it runs with a good straight course
by virtue of an arrangement of diesel/gas-turbine
generator units behind the bow area and has a
horizontal trim.

14. The vessel as claimed in claim 13,
characterized in that the drive units are arranged in
the center area of the vessel or in front of the center
area of the vessel, for example under the deck-house
area in Ropax ferries, in order to obtain small
mechanical stresses for the vessel (smooth water
moment, transverse-force profile).

15. The vessel as claimed in claim 13 or 14,
characterized in that the shanks and housings of the



-14-

rudder propellers are shaped and arranged in such a way
that, together with the flow-guiding elements (skeggs)
on the hull and the stern shape, they produce an end of
the hull of the vessel, the shape of which allows water
to run off without eddying.

16. The vessel as claimed in claim 13, 14 or 15,
characterized in that, apart from the bulb at the bow
with its, if appropriate, partially concave transition
into the shape of the front of the vessel and the
skeggs, it does not have any flow-guiding elements.

17. The vessel as claimed in one or more of the
preceding claims, characterized in that the hull is
designed for speeds of between 20 and 36 knots.

18. The vessel as claimed in one or more of the
preceding claims, characterized in that it is designed
as a Roro or Ropax vessel, the rudder propellers being
designed as low rudder propellers and being arranged
underneath the main car deck in such a way that the
main car deck can be driven onto from behind and can be
designed so as to extend from the stern to the bow.

19. The vessel as claimed in one or more of the
preceding claims, preferably as claimed in claim 13 or
14, characterized in that it has at least two
motor/generator units for the drive, said
motor/generator units being distributed according to
stability specifications and being arranged on the
bottom of the vessel and emitting their exhaust gases
centrally.

20. The vessel as claimed in one or more of the
preceding claims, characterized in that the space for
the motor/generator units with the associated control
and switching devices is arranged and bounded by
bulkheads in the vessel in such a way that the SOLAS
and IMO stability requirements and, with regard to
safety, the Stockholm Convention for sea-going vessels
are complied with.



-15-

21. The vessel as claimed in one or more of
claims 1 to 17 and 19, 20, characterized in that it is
embodied as a container vessel.

22. The vessel as claimed in one or more of
claims 1 to 17 and 19, 20, characterized in that it is
embodied as a cruise liner.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.



~ CA 02373462 2001-11-13
GR 99 P 8529 P O1
Description
Course-holding, high-speed, sea-going vessel having a
hull which is optimized for a rudder propeller
The invention relates to a course-holding,
high-speed, sea-going vessel having a hull which is
intended to hold payloads or passengers and at least
one rotatable, preferably electric, rudder propeller
(Pod) which is arranged gondola-like under the hull of
the vessel and has, to supply it with power, at least
one motor/generator unit which is arranged in the hull
of the vessel.
Vessels which correspond to the above are
known, for example from the field of cruise liners. The
known vessels are vessels with a keel structure in
which the rudder and the shaft system have been
replaced by one or more electric rudder propellers. The
actual shape of the vessel is essentially unchanged. An
example is presented in the publication "The SSP
Propulsor" from Siemens and Schottel,
No. 159U559 04982.
The object of the invention is to specify a
new, high-speed, sea-going vessel which has, in
contrast, an overall design which has been specifically
optimized for the use of electric rudder propellers to
make it possible, in particular, to exploit fully all
the possible advantages in terms of the utilization of
space, the handling characteristics, the resistance of
the vessel and the efficiency of the propulsion of the
vessel which can be obtained by using electric rudder
propellers.
The object is achieved in that the hull of the
vessel is designed so as to be adapted to the electric
rudder propeller drive both optimized in terms of
utilized space and also in terms of flow, for which
purpose the hull of the vessel mainly has a bottom

°
CA 02373462 2001-11-13
GR 99 P 8529 P O1
- 2 -
which rises somewhat toward the two sides of the hull,
and in that the front part of the hull is designed so
as to stabilize the course and movement of the vessel
and ends under water, in particular in a relatively
slender bow with a bulb, and in that a flow-guiding
element (skegg) is arranged upstream of each rudder
propeller in order both to optimize the handling
characteristics and to achieve an optimized flow
against the rudder propeller, which has a displacement
volume for the water flowing against the respective
rudder propeller. This new design makes it
advantageously possible both to configure the useful
space in the hull in an optimized fashion and to obtain
stable course-holding and sea-going characteristics
with the smallest possible resistance of the vessel and
optimized drive efficiency. In particular, an increase
in useful space by significantly more than 10% and an
increase in the efficiency of propulsion by several
percent are achieved in this way. Thus, the
customer - shipowner or charterer - is provided with an
increased payload volume with reduced energy
consumption when operating the vessel. There is also
the option of traveling at a higher speed.
The introduction of the skegg which is
essential to the invention increases the wetted surface
of the body of the vessel. This known fact, which has
previously discouraged experts in the field from using
voluminous flow-guiding elements on the lower part of a
sea-going vessel to a relatively large extent, is,
however, surprisingly more than made up for by the
advantages, such as the increase in the propulsion
efficiency which is possible, and by the optimized low-
resistance outgoing flow in the stern area of the
vessel. Overall, the use of the skeggs according to the
invention provide for the vessel such great advantages
that they more than compensate for the disadvantage of
the greater wetted surface. This applies in particular


GR 99 P 8529 P O1
CA 02373462 2001-11-13
- 3 -
to vessels which are driven by rudder propellers in a
multiple arrangement.
The vessel according to the invention disproves
the prejudices of experts in respect of the use of
voluminous underwater flow-guiding elements for sea
going vessels, in particular if the overall design of
the hull is optimized for the use of rotatable rudder
propellers, and said rudder propellers are
appropriately dimensioned and arranged. In this
context, it is particularly advantageous to use low
electric rudder propellers which permit particularly
favorable skegg designs (small skegg surfaces) and
whose shanks and motor housing can be included in the
optimization of flow.
In a refinement of the invention there is a
provision for the bow to be designed, in particular in
the lower part, with, in part, a concave profile. As a
result, it is very advantageously possible to select
an, overall, relatively full shape for the forebody of
the vessel without having to dispense with a course-
holding effect of the bow.
In a further refinement of the invention there
is provision that the flow-guiding elements (skeggs)
are hook-shaped at the end in the longitudinal
direction, preferably their design is matched to the
specific type of vessel and they have an outgoing flow
characteristic which gives rise to a decelerated flow
against the housing of the rudder propellers largely
free of separation. This results, inter alia, in the
advantageous possible increase according to the
invention in the efficiency of propulsion of the rudder
propellers, the rudder propellers themselves being
advantageously arranged and set, as a result of an
angular position in respect of the rising stern in a
vertical direction in respect of the bottom of the
vessel and the longitudinal direction of the vessel, in
such a way as to produce a further improvement in the
resistance-optimized outgoing flow of the rear part of


GR 99 P 8529 P O1
CA 02373462 2001-11-13
- 4 -
the vessel and an increase in the propulsion efficiency
(skeggs).
There is provision here that the flow-guiding
elements (skeggs) are arranged bent toward the outside
on the bottom of the vessel, the angle being between 3°
and 10°, in particular approximately 7°. Together with
a design of the flow-guiding elements which is droplet-
shaped in cross section, a flow channel which is
designed so as to widen in the upward direction,
leading to a separation-free, decelerated flow against
the rudder propellers, is obtained. At the same time,
in general terms, a very good course-holding stability,
which is advantageously maintained even when there are
rolling movements, is obtained.
In a further refinement of the invention there
is provision that the flow-guiding elements, the lower
part of the hull and the bow are designed in terms of
shape and length so as to bring about a low-resistance
straight course of the vessel. Here, the flow-guiding
elements form an integral part of the hull, the skegg
parameters being as follows: on average the skegg width
is in the range 0.1 to 0.06 of the width of the vessel,
in particular approximately 0.08 of the width of the
vessel, the skegg depth is approximately in the range
1.0 to 0.74 of the draft of the vessel, in particular
approximately 0.92 of the draft of the vessel, and has
an offset with respect to the center of the vessel
approximately equal to the distance between the
respective propeller shaft and the center of the
vessel. The skegg length is advantageously between 0.25
and 0.38 of the length of the water line at the
designed draft, in particular approximately 0.32 of the
length of the water line at the designed draft. A skegg
is advantageously arranged in front of each rudder
propeller.
It is particularly advantageous that the skeggs
are designed as front vanes for the rudder propellers
if they approximately comply with the conditions


GR 99 P 8529 P O1
CA 02373462 2001-11-13
- 5 -
specified above. Thus, the rudder effect is amplified
at small angles of the rudder propeller, and the vessel
reliably follows the rudder angles with the stern,
without significantly drifting in a lateral direction.
In a further refinement of the invention there
is provision that each rudder propeller has preferably
two individual propellers, in particular unidirectional
propellers, and that the propellers are arranged in a
directional overall outgoing flow of the rear of the
vessel, which leads to a decelerated oncoming flow in
the vicinity of the rudder propellers. This results
advantageously in a high level of efficiency of
propulsion by virtue of the combination of rudder
propeller and shape of the vessel.
In a further refinement of the invention there
is provision that by virtue of an arrangement of diesel
(gas-turbine) generator units behind the bow area the
hull is designed so as to run in a particularly
directionally stable fashion and, apart from the bulb
at the bow with its partially concave transition into
the shape of the front of the vessel and the skeggs,
does not have any flow-guiding elements. This results
in a good course-holding characteristic of the vessel
with a low-resistance flow around the vessel with a
simultaneously optimized outgoing flow at the stern.
In a further refinement of the invention there
is provision that the rudder propellers are arranged on
shanks which act as flow-guiding elements, are in
particular short, and have housings for the propeller
shaft which act as flow-guiding elements. This results
both in an optimized design of the useful space in the
vessel and also in good maneuverability.
There is further provision that the shanks and
housings of the rudder propellers are shaped in such a
way that, together with the flow-guiding elements on
the hull and the stern shape, they produce an end of
the hull which is optimized in terms of outgoing flow
and has low resistance. This optimization, which is


GR 99 P 8529 P Ol
CA 02373462 2001-11-13
- 6 -
achieved on the basis of towing tank trials, makes the
advantages of a vessel hull which is optimized for
drive by rudder propellers particularly striking. In
total, an increased level of propulsion efficiency
together with reduced vessel resistance are obtained.
There is provision that the abovementioned
optimizations are used in particular for hulls which
are designed for speeds of between 20 and 36 knots. At
such high speeds of a vessel, the previously unattained
course-holding stability in conjunction with the high
level of propulsion efficiency and the low vessel
resistance, in particular, are advantageous.
The design according to the invention of a
high-speed, sea-going vessel is of particular advantage
if it is designed as a Roro or Ropax vessel, the rudder
propellers being designed as low rudder propellers and
being arranged underneath the main car deck in such a
way that the main car deck can be designed so as to
extend from the stern to the bow. This results in a
specific optimization of the useful space for Roro or
Ropax vessels. The advantages achieved are of course
also obtained for container vessels or passenger
vessels.
The drives from the Siemens/Schottel Consortium
mentioned in the brochure mentioned at the beginning
can be configured as low rudder propellers without
major changes because they have a particularly low
hull/shank junction. Together with a slip ring
arrangement within the upper part of the shank and
rotary motors directly at the upper edge of the shank,
or else in the upper part of the shank, this results in
such a low overall height of the drive that the stern
of the vessel can be designed so as to be virtually
free of the influence of the drive on the inside. The
auxiliary units for the rudder propeller, such as the
hydraulic pumps, are arranged here essentially next to
the hull/shank junction so that a low bearing level for
entry ramps for vehicles etc. can be installed in the


GR 99 P 8529 P Ol
CA 02373462 2001-11-13
stern area. The main car deck can be arranged directly
above the rotary bearing of the low rudder propeller
and an access to the shank of the rudder propeller can
then be provided through a shank cover.
In one refinement of the vessel, there is
advantageously provision here that it has at least two
motor/generator units for the drive which are arranged
on the bottom of the vessel. This ensures good
stability of the vessel with an optimized car deck
arrangement. The space for the motor/generator units
with the associated control and switching devices is
arranged in the hull and bounded by bulkheads in such a
way that the SOLAS and IMO stability requirements and
the Stockholm Convention for sea-going vessels are
complied with. This results, according to the
invention, not only in a sea-going vessel which is
optimized in terms of space and consumption but also
which is particularly safe.
The invention is explained in more detail with
reference to drawings, it being possible to infer
further advantageous details which are essential to the
invention both from said drawings and from the
subclaims.
In particular:
FIG 1 shows the side view of a Ropax vessel which is
designed in accordance with the invention,
FIG 2 shows a cross section at the level of the
machine room through a vessel corresponding to
FIG 1,
FIG 3 shows a longitudinal section with a view of the
interior of the vessel and of the hull shape of
the vessel through a vessel corresponding to
FIG 1,
FIG 4 shows a section at the level of the second deck
through a vessel corresponding to FIG 1,
FIG 5 shows a section at the level of the first deck
through a vessel corresponding to FIG 1,


GR 99 P 8529 P O1
CA 02373462 2001-11-13
_ g
FIG 6 shows the car deck with the loading ramp of a
different but similar vessel constructed in
accordance with the invention,
FIG 7 shows the weather deck of a different but
similar vessel which is constructed in
accordance with the invention,
FIG 8 shows a partial section through the afterbody
of a different but similar vessel in accordance
with the invention with integral skeggs, and
FIG 9 shows the linear outline of such vessels in the
skegg area.
In FIG 1, 1 designates the bridge of the
vessel, 2 designates the bow and 3 the bow bulb. The
weather deck 9, which can thus extend from the aft to
the fore part of the vessel, extends into the bow 2. At
a suitable distance behind the bridge 1 there is the
funnel structure 4 with the exhaust pipes, whose
arrangement can be selected relatively independently of
the current position of the diesel or gas turbine
generator units. Like the weather deck 9, the main
freight deck, for example a main car deck 10, is
designed so as to extend from the stern to the bow so
that these decks have a storage area extending from the
stern to the bow of the vessel. The short rudder
propeller 6, which according to the invention is
advantageously embodied here as a double rudder
propeller, is responsible for the fact that the main
car deck 10 is continuous even in the stern area. This
results in particularly small propeller diameters
accompanied by a good degree of efficiency. A skegg 8,
which, as shown, ends in a hook shape at a distance 7
in front of the rudder propeller 6, is arranged in each
case in front of the rudder propeller 6. The distance 7
is essential for a vibration-free flow against the
rudder propeller 6, it is therefore as a rule 1% of the
length of the vessel. 2 to 3% of the length of the
vessel are also advantageous. The underwater part 11 of
the vessel is designed so as to rise slowly in the


GR 99 P 8529 P O1
CA 02373462 2001-11-13
- 9 -
stern area so that a largely eddy-free, low-resistance
efflux is produced in the stern area. Overall, with the
type of vessel according to the invention, the shape of
the bow and of the stern, the size and arrangement of
the rudder propellers and the skeggs are very
advantageously matched to one another in such a way
that the vessel moves with good course-holding
characteristics and at low resistance accompanied by a
high level of propulsion efficiency of the drive.
In FIG 2, 12 designates diesel generator units
with off-center exhaust-gas ducting. This produces
lorry loading tracks which can be configured in an
optimum way.
FIGS 3, 4 and 5 show machine rooms with
indicated diesel units 13, 17 and 21 at the bottom
center/front part of the vessel. As is apparent, the
small diesel or gas turbine units can be distributed in
such a way that a continuous main car deck is produced.
The precise installation location is selected, for
example in the center area of the vessel, in such a way
that favorable longitudinal mechanical stresses (smooth
water moment, transverse force profile) for the vessel
are obtained.
In FIG 3, 18 designates the main car deck and
14 the weather deck. In FIG 4, 20 designates converters
and transformers and 14 designates hydraulic units in
the stern. The hydraulic units in the stern are
advantageously arranged in a hydraulic room 15
approximately at the level of the upper edge of the
rudder propellers 16. These units therefore lie below
the continuous main car deck.
In FIG 5, 19 finally designates the skeggs,
which are directed rearward at this level and which
form an integral component of the underside of the
hull.
An advantageous design of the deck is shown in
FIG 7 (weather deck) and FIG 6 (main car deck). In
FIGS 6 and 7, the parking aisles for the motor


GR 99 P 8529 P O1
CA 02373462 2001-11-13
- 10 -
vehicles, containers, etc. are designated by 24 and 25.
The entry ramp for the vehicles is designated by 23. As
is apparent, the design according to the invention
provides a larger number of parking spaces for vehicles
or containers than has ever been achieved before.
FIG 8 shows a cross section through the vessel
in the area where the skeggs start. Here, the lorries
on the weather deck are designated by 26. The lorries
on the main car deck are designated by 27 and the
lorries in the lower part of the vessel by 28. To carry
passenger cars, side deck tracks 29 which can be raised
and which can be driven onto from the main deck are
provided here. The front parts 30 of the skeggs are
integrated into the double bottom and its steel frame
and stringer system. The skeggs therefore form integral
parts of the structure of the vessel.
Finally, FIG 9 serves to explain the skegg
parameters, the skegg parameters being selected in
particular as a function of the type of vessel. The
skegg parameters are similarly varied, depending on
whether the vessel is a pure Roro vessel, in which only
a relatively low level of traveling comfort is
required, a Ropax ferry, a container or a passenger
vessel. The distance between the rudder propeller and
the rear edge of the skegg is also selected according
to these criteria because these are decisive for the
smooth running of the rudder propellers. The greater
the distance, the lower the transmission of vibration
by pressure pulses from the rudder propellers is to the
hull.
The pressure pulses from the propellers of the
rudder propellers to the respective shank and hull of
the vessel are, on the other hand, advantageously
influenced by technical control measures.

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date Unavailable
(86) PCT Filing Date 2000-05-10
(87) PCT Publication Date 2000-11-16
(85) National Entry 2001-11-13
Dead Application 2006-05-10

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2005-05-10 FAILURE TO REQUEST EXAMINATION
2005-05-10 FAILURE TO PAY APPLICATION MAINTENANCE FEE

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Application Fee $300.00 2001-11-13
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 2 2002-05-10 $100.00 2002-04-30
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 2002-10-22
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 3 2003-05-12 $100.00 2003-04-30
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 4 2004-05-10 $100.00 2004-04-16
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
SEA TRADE AS
Past Owners on Record
ANDERSEN, PETER
HENRIKSEN, BJOERN A.
TIGGES, KAY
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Representative Drawing 2002-05-02 1 8
Drawings 2001-11-13 8 162
Description 2001-11-13 10 507
Cover Page 2002-05-03 1 53
Abstract 2001-11-13 1 31
Claims 2001-11-13 5 194
PCT 2001-11-13 14 497
Assignment 2001-11-13 3 106
Correspondence 2002-04-30 1 25
PCT 2001-11-14 4 166
Correspondence 2002-10-22 1 54
Prosecution-Amendment 2004-01-05 1 29
Assignment 2002-10-22 2 100
Assignment 2002-11-27 1 34