Language selection

Search

Patent 2389860 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2389860
(54) English Title: MITIGATION OF COKE DEPOSITS IN REFINERY REACTOR UNITS
(54) French Title: REDUCTION DE DEPOTS DE COKE DANS DES GROUPES REACTEURS D'UNE RAFFINERIE
Status: Deemed expired
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C10G 11/18 (2006.01)
  • C10B 43/14 (2006.01)
  • C10G 9/32 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • NAHAS, NICHOLAS CHARLES (United States of America)
  • DRAEMEL, DEAN CLISE (United States of America)
  • WALTER, RICHARD EDWARDS (United States of America)
  • SISKIN, MICHAEL (United States of America)
  • PHILLIPS, GLEN E. (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • EXXONMOBIL RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY (United States of America)
(71) Applicants :
  • EXXONMOBIL RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY (United States of America)
(74) Agent: BORDEN LADNER GERVAIS LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2010-01-12
(86) PCT Filing Date: 2000-10-20
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 2001-05-25
Examination requested: 2005-09-27
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/US2000/028985
(87) International Publication Number: WO2001/036563
(85) National Entry: 2002-05-02

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
09/438,439 United States of America 1999-11-12
09/685,359 United States of America 2000-10-10

Abstracts

English Abstract




A method for mitigating the condensation of liquid hydrocarbons and subsequent
coke deposition in refinery reactor
units by dew point suppression.


French Abstract

L'invention concerne un procédé permettant de réduire la condensation d'hydrocarbures liquides et la formation subséquente de dépôts de coke dans des groupes réacteurs d'une raffinerie par suppression du point de rosée.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.




-14-

CLAIMS:


1. A method for mitigating the condensation of liquid hydrocarbons and
subsequent coke deposition in refinery reactor units wherein during operation
of said
units a dense phase zone comprising hydrocarbon feed and a dilute phase zone
comprising vaporized hydrocarbon products produced from said hydrocarbon feed
and
a phase transition zone between said dense and dilute phase zones are present,
said
method comprising injecting a non-condensable medium wherein said medium is a
non-condensable vapor, gas, or a mixture thereof, into said dilute phase zone,
to form
an admixture with said vaporized hydrocarbon products wherein the dew point of
the
dilute phase zone is suppressed while maintaining the temperature above the
suppressed dew point and wherein said dew point of said dilute phase zone will
be
suppressed by at least about 5°F below the temperature of said dilute
phase zone.


2. The method of claim 1 wherein said non-condensable medium is non-
condensable at temperatures greater than or equal to the temperature of the
dilute phase
zone.


3. The method of claim 1 wherein said non-condensable medium is steam,
hydrocarbon, inert gas or a mixture thereof.


4. The method of claim 1 wherein said refinery unit is a fluid coking unit.


5. The method of claim 1 wherein said refinery unit is a fluid catalytic
cracking
unit.


6. The method of claim 1 wherein said non-condensable medium is injected at a
temperature at least about 1 to about 100°F higher than the phase
transition zone.


7. The method of claim 1 wherein at least about 5 mole % of non-condensable
medium is injected.




-15-

8. The method of claim 4 wherein the temperature of said non-condensable
medium is selected to maintain the temperature of the reactor cyclone outlet
at least
about 5°F higher than the phase transition temperature.


9. The method of claim 4 wherein the fluid coking unit includes cyclone inlets
and
the non-condensable medium is introduced into the dilute phase zone below the
fluid
coking unit cyclone inlets.


10. The method of claim 5 wherein the temperature of said non-condensable
medium is selected to maintain the temperature of the reactor cyclone outlet
at least
about 10°F higher than the phase transition temperature.


11. The method of claim 5 wherein the fluid catalytic cracking unit includes
cyclone outlets discharging into a plenum and the non-condensable medium is
introduced into the plenum below the fluid coking unit cyclone outlets.


12. The method of claim 1 wherein said phase transition zone contains product
vapors and wherein said non-condensible medium, scouring coke or a mixture
thereof
is injected at a temperature sufficient to maintain or raise the temperature
of said
product vapors in said phase transition zone at least about 1 to 20°F
above the phase
transition zone temperature.


Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.



CA 02389860 2002-05-02
WO 01/36563 PCTIUSOO/28985
-1-
MITIGATION OF COKE DEPOSITS IN REFINERY REACTOR UNITS
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

A preferred embodiment of the invention is directed to mitigating the
formation of coke deposits in petroleum refinery reactor units, particularly
in the
cyclones of fluidized bed coking units (fluid cokers) and reactor overheads of
fluid
catalytic cracking units.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Fluidized bed coking (fluid coking) is a petroleum refining process in
which mixtures of heavy petroleum fractions, typically the non-distillable
residue
(resid) from fractionation, are converted to lighter, more useful products by
thermal
decomposition (coking) at elevated reaction temperatures, typically about 900
to
1100 F (about 480 to 590 C). A large vessel of coke particles maintained at
the
reaction temperature is fluidized with steam. The feed is heated to a pumpable
temperature, mixed with atomizing steam, and fed through a plurality of feed
nozzles
to the fluidized bed reactor. The light hydrocarbon products of the coking
reaction
are vaporized, mixed with the fluidizing steam and pass upwardly through the
fluidized bed into a dilute phase zone above the dense fluidized bed of coke
particles.
The transition between the dense bed (dense phase zone) and dilute phase,
where
product vapor is substantially separated from solid particles, is hereinafter
referred to
as the phase transition zone. The remainder of the feed liquid coats the coke
particles
and subsequently decomposes into layers of solid coke and lighter products
which
evolve as gas or vaporized liquid. The solid coke consists mainly of carbon
with


CA 02389860 2002-05-02
WO 01/36563 PCTIUSOO/28985
-2-
lesser amounts of hydrogen, sulfur, nitrogen, and traces of vanadium, nickel,
iron,
and other elements. The fluidized coke is circulated through a burner, where
part of
the coke is burned with air to raise its temperature from about 900 F to about
1300 F
(about 480 to 704 C), and back to the fluidized bed reaction zone.

The mixture of vaporized hydrocarbon products and steam continues to
flow upwardly through the dilute phase at superficial velocities of about 3 to
6 feet
per second (about 1 to 2 meters per second), entraining some fine solid
particles.
Most of the entrained solids are separated from the gas phase by centrifugal
force in
one or more cyclone separators, and are returned to the dense fluidized bed by
gravity. The gas phase undergoes pressure drop and cooling as it passes
through the
cyclone separators, primarily at the inlet and outlet passages where the
velocity is
increased. The cooling which accompanies the pressure decrease causes
condensation
of some liquid which deposits on surfaces of the cyclone inlet and outlet.
Because
the temperature of the liquid so condensed and deposited is higher than about
900 F
(about 480 C), coking reactions occur there, leaving solid deposits of coke.
Coke
deposits also form on the reactor stripper sheds, and other surfaces of the
fluid coker
reactor.

The mixture of steam and hydrocarbon vapor is subsequently discharged
from the cyclone outlet and quenched to about 750 F (about 400 C) by contact
with
downflowing liquid in a scrubber vessel section of the fluid coker equipped
with
internal sheds to facilitate contacting. A pumparound loop circulates
condensed
liquid to an external cooling means and back to the top row of scrubber sheds
to
provide cooling for the quench and condensation of the heaviest fraction of
the liquid
product. This heavy fraction is typically recycled to extinction by feeding
back to the


CA 02389860 2002-05-02
WO 01/36563 PCTIUSOO/28985

-3-
fluidized bed reaction zone, but may be present for several hours in the pool
at the
bottom of the scrubber vessel and the pumparound loop, allowing time for coke
to
form and deposit on shed surfaces because of the elevated temperatures.

Feed is injected through nozzles with atomizing steam into the fluidized
bed reactor. The feed components not immediately vaporized coat the coke
particles
and are subsequently decomposed into layers of solid coke and lighter products

which evolve as gas or vaporized liquids. During this conversion process some
coke
particles may become unevenly or too heavily coated with feed and during
collision
with other coke particles stick together. These agglomerated, now heavier,
coke
particles may not be efficiently fluidized by the steam injected into the
bottom of
stripper section and are subsequently carried under from the reactor section
to the
stripper section where they adhere to and build up on the top rows of sheds in
the
stripper section. Build up of deposits on the stripper sheds can become so
severe due
to overlapping of the deposits on adjacent sheds as to restrict fluidization
of the coke
in the reactor section above and eventually shut the unit down.

Fouling of cyclone outlets and scrubber sheds in a Fluid Coker results
in decreased capacity and run length of the unit, culminating in costly
unplanned
shutdowns. The deposits are sometimes removed from the outlet of the cyclone
with
metal rods and water jets at high pressure to clear the cyclone outlet area
and to keep
the unit running. The effectiveness of this approach is temporary and
unpredictable.
Chunks of coke may fall back into the cyclone body and interfere with cyclone
operation. The coke deposits must similarly be removed from the reactor
scrubber
sheds, reactor walls and other areas of the fluid coker that become fouled. It
is well
known in the art that providing sufficient cooling of the pumparound loop will
help


CA 02389860 2002-05-02
WO 01/36563 PCTIUSOO/28985
-4-
minimize fouling of scrubber sheds, but this technique does not affect the
cyclone
outlet area.

Fluid Catalytic Cracking (FCC) is another petroleum refining
conversion process in which heavy oil, typically the highest boiling
distillable
fraction, is converted to gasoline, diesel and jet fuel, heating oil,
liquefied petroleum
gas (LPG), chemical feedstocks, and refinery fuel gas by catalytic
decomposition at
similarly elevated temperatures of about 900 to 1100 F (about 480 to 590 C).
In a
Fluid Catalytic Cracking Unit (FCCU), the heavy oil feed is typically mixed
with
steam and sprayed into a rising stream of hot (1100 to 1400 F or about 590 to
760 C)
powdered silica-alumina catalyst. The feed is vaporized by contact with the
hot
catalyst, and the vapor decomposes catalytically into the desired products
within a
few seconds, whereupon the solid catalyst particles are separated
centrifugally from
the vapor by means of cyclone separators or equivalent means. The product
vapor
passes through the cyclone outlets into a plenum chamber at the top of the
reactor,
through a discharge nozzle into an overhead line, then to a fractionator where
the
vapor is quenched and condensed in a zone similar to the coker scrubber
described
above. The separated catalyst is introduced into a stripping zone in which it
is further
stripped with steam to recover entrained vapor. Because the stripping steam is
typically at a significantly lower temperature than the spent catalyst, the
catalyst is
cooled by the stripping steam to a temperature significantly below the
reaction
temperature.

Run length or capacity of an FCCU may likewise be limited by
deposition of coke in the stripper, reactor overhead, plenum, nozzle, transfer
line, or
inlet to the fractionator. Coke formation occurs where heat loss allows
condensation
of heavy hydrocarbons which decompose to form coke. Deposit formation is
further


CA 02389860 2002-05-02
WO 01/36563 PCTIUSOO/28985
-5-
aggravated by entrapment of entrained catalyst particles in the condensate.
Deposits
are most likely to occur where flanges or other heat sinks provide surfaces
below the
dew point of the product vapor. Deposits may also form at the inlet to the
fractionator where expansion cooling of the hot product vapor causes
condensation
and subsequent coke formation. The coke buildup restricts flow and increases
pressure drop between the reactor overhead and the fractionator. In units
limited by
compressor capacity, the pressure drop may be sufficient to limit capacity
long
before the end of the run, and may ultimately require premature or unplanned
shutdown.

In both fluid coking (FCU) and fluid catalytic cracking units (FCCU),
there is a reaction zone in which the product vapor is in intimate contact
with
particulate solids, known as the dense phase zone, and a dilute phase zone in
which
the solids have been substantially separated from the product vapor or where
coke
and catalyst have disengaged from the dilute (vapor) phase. The mass of solid
particles in the reaction zone is many times the mass of the product vapor,
and in
both types of units the heaviest reaction products condense on the solid
particles to
form coke. The dew point of the product vapor emerging from the reaction zone
(dense phase zone) into the dilute phase zone is essentially the same
temperature as
the temperature at the transition from the reaction zone (dense phase zone) to
the
dilute phase zone known as the phase transition temperature. In many FCCU's
the
reaction zone is terminated by cyclone separators, and the dilute phase is the
zone
into which the cyclone outlets discharge, typically a plenum at the top of the
vessel
housing the cyclones.

What is needed in the art is an efficient, predictable, and effective way
to mitigate the formation of detrimental coke deposits in the dilute phase
overhead


CA 02389860 2002-05-02
WO 01/36563 PCTIUSOO/28985

-6-
equipment such as fluid coker cyclones and accompanying surfaces and in the
overhead dilute phase zone, plenum, discharge nozzle and overhead lines of
fluid
catalytic cracking units to avoid loss of capacity and expensive shutdowns.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

An embodiment of the present invention is a method for mitigating the
condensation of liquid hydrocarbons and subsequent coke formation at
temperatures
in the range of about 700 F to 1100 F (about 370 C to 590 C ) in the dilute
phase
zones of fluid cokers and FCCU's such as occurs in overhead equipment.

An embodiment of the invention is directed to a method for mitigating
the condensation of liquid hydrocarbons and subsequent coke deposition in
refinery
reactor units wherein during operation of said units a dense phase zone
comprising
hydrocarbon feed and a dilute phase zone comprising vaporized hydrocarbon

products produced from said hydrocarbon feed and a phase transition zone
between
said dense and dilute phase zones are present, said method comprising
injecting a
non-condensable medium wherein said medium is selected from the group
consisting
of non-condensable vapors, gases, and mixtures thereof into said dilute phase
zone,
to form an admixture with said vaporized hydrocarbon products wherein the dew
point of the dilute phase zone is suppressed while maintaining the temperature
above
the suppressed dew point and wherein said dew point of said dilute phase zone
will
be suppressed by at least about 5 F (about 3 C) below the temperature of said
dilute
phase zone.

Practice of the invention comprises introducing a stream of gas or
vapor, typically steam, which is non-condensable at temperatures above about
705 F


CA 02389860 2009-06-05

-7-
(about 374 C) into the dilute phase zone to form an admixture with the product
hydrocarbon vapor. If another gas is used, it will be non-condensable at
temperatures
equal to or greater than the dilute phase zone.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

Figure 1 depicts a typical fluid coking unit. A are scrubber sheds, B the
cyclone outlet, C, D, and E are the dense phase reaction zone, phase
transition zone,
and dilute phase reaction zone, respectively. El, E2, E3, E4 are feed
injection ports,
and F are stripper sheds.

Figure 2 depicts a typical FCCU. M = flue gas outlet,
N= regenerator, P = air injection, Q = regenerated catalyst standpipe,
R = spent catalyst standpipe, S = feed inlet, G = stripper, H = cyclone
separators,
I= plenum, J = Product Vapor outlet, K = dilute phase zone, and
L = dense phase reaction zone.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

It has been found that formation of coke proceeds within a few hours in
the condensed liquid phase at temperatures above about 700 F (about 370 C),
but
very slowly in the gas or vapor phases even at significantly higher
temperatures than
are encounted in fluid coking or fluid catalytic cracking. It has further been
found
that the dew point of the mixture of fluidizing steam and hydrocarbon product
vapors
in the dilute phase of both fluid cokers and fluid catalytic cracking units is
the
temperature of the phase transition zone from the dense phase to the dilute
phase.
Applicants have discovered that by injecting a non-condensable vapor
and/or gas into the dilute phase zone, the dew point of the admixture so
produced by


CA 02389860 2002-05-02
WO 01/36563 PCT/US00/28985
-g-
the medium and dilute phase will be below the pre-injection temperature of the
dilute
phase, and condensation and, hence, coke deposition, will thereby largely be
prevented. Thus, the non-condensable medium is a medium that is non-
condensable
at temperatures equal to or greater than the dilute phase zone. For water, it
is greater
than or equal to 705 F (374 C). The non-condensable medium will be injected
under
conditions sufficient to prevent cooling of the product vapor in the
transition phase
zone and to maintain or raise the temperature of the product vapors in the
phase
transition zone about I to about 20 F (about 0.6 C to about 11 C) above that
of the
phase transition zone. The non-condensable medium may itself serve to prevent
cooling of the product vapor by maintaining or raising its temperature, or
another
means may be utilized.

An embodiment of the invention is directed to a method to mitigate the
formation of coke deposits formed in refinery units such as fluid coker units
and fluid
catalytic cracking units during operation of said units, wherein said units
have a
reaction zone in which the product vapor is in intimate contact with a mass of
solid
particles such as coke or catalyst, said mass of solid particles being
substantially
greater than the mass of said product vapor, and a dilute phase zone in which
said
product vapor has been substantially separated from said solid particles in
the
reaction zone. The method comprises mitigating the formation of coke deposits
in
such refinery units, by injecting a gas or vapor such as steam into the dilute
phase
zone of the said reactor unit, said gas or vapor being at a temperature at
least about
equal to the temperature of said phase transition zone at the transition
between the
dense phase zone and the dilute phase zone, wherein said gas or vapor is non-
condensable at temperatures above about 705 F (about 374 C), and wherein said
gas
or vapor is injected in an amount and at a temperature sufficient to lower the
dew
point of said dilute phase zone while maintaining the temperature of said
dilute phase


CA 02389860 2002-05-02
WO 01/36563 PCT/US00/28985

-9-
zone above said lowered dew point. Typically, it will be desirable for the dew
point
of the admixture of non-condensable medium and dilute phase to be at least
about
F less (about 6 C) than the temperature of the dilute phase post injection.
Any
temperature difference between the dew point and dilute phase post injection
of non-
condensable medium will suffice, preferably a difference of at least about 5 F
(difference of about 3 C), more preferably at least about 10 F (difference of
about
6 C) will be used. The above operation is carried out continuously during
normal
operation of the refinery units.

Preferably, the non-condensable medium will be injected into the dilute
phase zone of the reactor at a temperature higher than the temperature of the
phase
transition zone, hereinafter called the phase transition temperature.
Otherwise, there
is a risk that the cooling of the product vapor, already at its dew point,
will cause the
condensation of liquid which it is intended to prevent. Preferably, the
temperature
will be at least about 1 to about 100 F, (about 0.6 to about 55 C) above the
phase
transition temperature and, more preferably, about 10 to about 50 F (6 to
about 28 C)
higher than the phase transition temperature. Lower temperatures than the
preferred
ranges will be less effective against downstream cooling effects, and higher
temperatures will increase thermal decomposition of product components to less
valuable constituents. Preferably, the temperature will be such that the
temperature
will maintain the temperature at the cyclone outlet at least about 5 F (at
least about
3 C higher) higher than the phase transition temperature.

During operation of a fluid coker, for example, coke is laid down in
several areas of the cyclone and also in the scrubber section. Areas such as
the
cyclone outlet are of particular concern since the deposited coke can restrict
flow


CA 02389860 2002-05-02
WO 01/36563 PCT/US00/28985
-10-
ultimately requiring system shutdown. Likewise, in the operation of a
fluidized
catalytic cracking unit, the product vapor at its dew point is introduced into
the larger
cross-sectional area of the fractionator, and the accompanying expansion
cooling can
be sufficient to condense droplets of liquid, some of which adhere to the
entrance
opening, where the liquid is held at elevated temperatures sufficient to cause
formation of coke deposits. The buildup of coke restricts flow and decreases
capacity.

An embodiment of the method offers a cost effective and efficient way
to prevent coke deposits that form in refinery units such as fluid cokers
(FCU) and
fluid catalytic cracking units (FCCU) to facilitate longer run times and to
maintain
throughput. Effective mitigation of coke deposits in areas of the units such
as the
cyclone and cyclone outlet of a FCU unit and the stripper, reactor overhead,
plenum,
nozzle transfer line or fractionator inlet of FCCU is achieved.

The coke deposit mitigation taught herein recognizes that coke deposits
form when products are condensed or are in the liquid phase. Coke deposits
form at
a substantially slower rate when the reactor products are in the gaseous
phase. Thus,
by maintaining the reaction products produced in refinery units in the gaseous
phase
in the dilute phase zone, prior to quenching, coke deposition can be easily
mitigated
thus preventing coke deposits from forming on reactor surfaces that can become
plugged necessitating unit shutdowns.

The invention involves suppressing the dew point of the dilute phase of
the reactor products while maintaining the temperature above the reduced dew
point.
To accomplish this, a non-condensable medium which may also be referred to as
a
diluent medium is injected into the dilute phase zone of the reactor unit.
Typically,


CA 02389860 2002-05-02
WO 01/36563 PCT/US00/28985
-11-
the amount of non-condensable medium injected will be that amount necessary to
cause the dew point of the dilute phase zone to be at least about 5 F (about 3
) below
the temperature of the dilute phase zone. Typically, at least about 5 mole %
non-
condensable medium will be injected. Non-condensable mediums can be selected
from, for example, steam, recycled hydrocarbon, inert gases and mixtures
thereof.
The term non-condensable as used herein means that the medium will be a gas or
a
vapor at temperatures above about 705 F (about 374 C). Though the
non-condensable medium can be used to maintain or raise the temperature of the
product vapors in the phase transition zone other methods may also be
employed.
Any alternative means which can accomplish this will suffice and may be used
alone
or in combination with the non-condensable medium being employed. to raise the
temperature of the product vapor. For example, scouring coke can be injected
into
the unit to maintain or raise the temperature of the product vapors. Other
means
known to the skilled artisan could also be employed.

As used herein, the dilute phase, the transition phase and dense phase
occupy the dilute phase zone, phase transition reaction zone, and dense phase
reaction zone, respectively. Thus, injection of the non-condensable medium
into the
dilute phase zone necessarily means injecting the medium into the dilute
phase.
Those skilled in the art readily appreciate such terminology and its
interchangeability.

The preferred amount of non-condensable medium will normally range
from about 1% to about 50% by volume of the product vapor and, more preferably
from about 5% to about 20% by volume. Lesser amounts than the preferred ranges
will be less effective at reducing the dew point, and greater amounts than the


CA 02389860 2002-05-02
WO 01/36563 PCTIUSOO/28985
-12-
preferred ranges will be more costly to provide and subsequently separate from
the
desired commercial products.

Preferably, in a fluid coker, the non-condensable medium will be
introduced into the dilute phase zone above the top of the dense bed and below
the
cyclone inlets.

Preferably, in an FCCU, the non-condensable medium will be
introduced into the plenum of the vessel housing the reactor cyclones, into
which
plenum the reaction products are discharged from the cyclone outlets.
Alternatively,
the non-condensable medium may be introduced anywhere downstream of the
primary cyclone outlet. If the unit configuration allows the stripping gas
from the
spent catalyst stripper to mix with the product vapor between the primary and
secondary cyclones, the non-condensable medium may be introduced into the
stripper as long as the spent catalyst is not cooled in the stripper as is
typical in the
current state of the art practice. If recycled hydrocarbon is to be utilized
as the non-
condensable medium introduced to the stripper, it is preferable to inject it
into the
dilute phase zone of the stripper to minimize hydrocarbon carryunder to the
regenerator.

In the course of performing the instant invention, one skilled in the art
can easily monitor with existing or installed thermocouples the temperature of
the
dense phase zone, the phase transition zone, or the dilute phase zone. It is
preferable
that the products, immediately prior to being quenched, are at a temperature
above
that of the phase transition zone. Preferably, they will be at a temperature
at least
about 1 to about 20 F (about 0.6 to about 11 C) and; more preferably, about 2
to
about 10 F (about 1 to 6 C) higher than the phase transition zone or the
phase


CA 02389860 2002-05-02
WO 01/36563 PCT/US00/28985

- 13-

transition temperature. Maintaining this higher temperature ensures that
product
vapor is above its dew point and minimizes the risk of liquid condensation and
subsequent formation of coke deposits. Preferably, the non-condensable medium,
when used to prevent the product vapor from cooling, will be of a temperature
when
injected such that it maintains the temperature of the reactor cyclone outlet
products
at a temperature of at least about 1 to about 20 F (0.6 to about 11 C) higher
than the
temperature of the phase transition zone.

In the case of an FCCU, it is preferable that the non-condensable
medium be injected at a temperature such that it maintains the temperature of
the
product vapor at the plenum outlet or the temperature of the fractionator
inlet at least
about 5 F (3 C) higher than the temperature of the riser outlet.

One skilled in the art will readily recognize that the non-condensable
medium can be injected into the dilute phase zone of the FCCU by injecting
into the
cyclone outlet plenum chamber, the product line upstream of the fractionator
inlet or
in some configurations the catalyst stripper where steam stripping occurs.

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date 2010-01-12
(86) PCT Filing Date 2000-10-20
(87) PCT Publication Date 2001-05-25
(85) National Entry 2002-05-02
Examination Requested 2005-09-27
(45) Issued 2010-01-12
Deemed Expired 2015-10-20

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 2002-05-02
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 2002-05-02
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 2002-05-02
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 2002-05-02
Application Fee $300.00 2002-05-02
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 2 2002-10-21 $100.00 2002-09-23
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 3 2003-10-20 $100.00 2003-09-23
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 4 2004-10-20 $100.00 2004-09-23
Request for Examination $800.00 2005-09-27
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 5 2005-10-20 $200.00 2005-09-28
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 6 2006-10-20 $200.00 2006-09-22
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 7 2007-10-22 $200.00 2007-09-28
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 8 2008-10-20 $200.00 2008-09-24
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 9 2009-10-20 $200.00 2009-09-18
Final Fee $300.00 2009-10-21
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 10 2010-10-20 $250.00 2010-09-17
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 11 2011-10-20 $250.00 2011-09-22
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 12 2012-10-22 $250.00 2012-09-27
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 13 2013-10-21 $250.00 2013-09-20
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
EXXONMOBIL RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY
Past Owners on Record
DRAEMEL, DEAN CLISE
NAHAS, NICHOLAS CHARLES
PHILLIPS, GLEN E.
SISKIN, MICHAEL
WALTER, RICHARD EDWARDS
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Claims 2002-05-02 3 76
Drawings 2002-05-02 2 20
Representative Drawing 2002-05-02 1 9
Abstract 2002-05-02 1 47
Description 2009-06-05 13 573
Claims 2009-06-05 2 72
Drawings 2009-06-05 2 21
Description 2002-05-02 13 572
Cover Page 2002-10-11 1 31
Representative Drawing 2009-12-15 1 3
Cover Page 2009-12-15 1 31
PCT 2002-05-02 4 186
Assignment 2002-05-02 11 706
Correspondence 2002-10-09 1 17
Prosecution-Amendment 2005-10-21 1 34
PCT 2002-05-03 4 164
Prosecution-Amendment 2005-09-27 1 20
Prosecution-Amendment 2009-02-27 3 93
Prosecution-Amendment 2009-06-05 8 272
Correspondence 2009-10-21 1 34