Language selection

Search

Patent 2393768 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2393768
(54) English Title: METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR TENDERIZING MEAT
(54) French Title: PROCEDE ET APPAREIL D'ATTENDRISSAGE DE VIANDES
Status: Expired
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • A22C 9/00 (2006.01)
  • A22B 5/00 (2006.01)
  • A22C 17/00 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • DOLEZAL, HOWARD G., JR. (United States of America)
  • GROSE, DARREN (United States of America)
  • BELL, BRIAN W. (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • EXCEL CORPORATION (United States of America)
(71) Applicants :
  • EXCEL CORPORATION (United States of America)
(74) Agent: RICHES, MCKENZIE & HERBERT LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2006-09-05
(86) PCT Filing Date: 2001-01-26
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 2001-08-02
Examination requested: 2003-01-28
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/US2001/002599
(87) International Publication Number: WO2001/054509
(85) National Entry: 2002-06-07

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
60/178,836 United States of America 2000-01-28

Abstracts

English Abstract





A method for tenderizing meat. The method includes separating
one or more vertebrae of a carcass of a red meat slaughter animal prior to
rigor
mortis, wherein the act of separating enables stretching of muscle fibbers in
the carcass,
and wherein the act of separating is conducted at a commercial chain speed.






French Abstract

La présente invention concerne un procédé d'attendrissage de viandes. Ce procédé consiste à séparer une ou plusieurs vertèbres de la carcasse d'un animal de boucherie à viande rouge avant l'état de rigidité cadavérique. L'opération de séparation, réalisée à vitesse de chaîne commerciale, permet aux fibres musculaires de s'étendre dans la carcasse.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.





CLAIMS:

1. A method for tenderizing meat in a red meat slaughter animal, the method
comprising:
separating at least one vertebra of a carcass of a red meat slaughter animal
prior
to rigor mortis to enable stretching of muscle fibers in the carcass;
wherein the act of separating is conducted at a commercial chain speed;
further wherein the act of separating is conducted without separating
connective
tissue, fat, or minor muscles on a portion of the carcass opposite the
vertebra.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein the act of separating includes separating a
twelfth
thoracic vertebra.
3. The method of claim 1 wherein the act of separating is conducted without
separating the muitifidus dorsi muscle or the intercostal muscles of the
carcass.
4, A method of claim 1 further comprising moving the carcass on a processing
chain
line at a chain speed of at least 150 head per hour.
5. The method of tendering meat in a red meat slaughter animal, the method
comprising:
separating at least one vertebra of a carcass of a red meat slaughter animal
prior
to rigor mortis to enable stretching of muscle fibers in the carcass;
wherein the act of separating is conducted at a commercial chain speed;
further wherein the act of separating is conducted without separating the
multifidus dorsi muscle and the intercostal muscles of the carcass.
6. The method of claim 5 wherein the act of separating includes separating a
twelfth
thoracic vertebra.
35




7. The method of claim 5 further comprising moving the carcass on a processing
chain line at a chain speed of at least 150 head per hour.
8. The method of claim 5 wherein the at least one vertebra is a ninth vertebra
located
between a ninth and a tenth rib of the carcass.
9. The method of claim 5 wherein the at Least one vertebra is a fifth vertebra
located
between a fifth and a sixth rib of the carcass.
10. The method of claim 5 wherein the at least one vertebra includes a first
vertebra
located between a twelfth rib and a thirteenth rib, a second vertebra located
between a
ninth rib and a tenth rib, and a third vertebra located between a fifth rib
and a sixth rib of
the carcass.
11. A method for tenderizing meat in a red meat slaughter animal, the method
comprising:
separating at least one vertebra of a carcass of a red meat slaughter animal
prior
to rigor mortis to enable stretching of muscle fibers in the carcass;
wherein the act of separating is conducted at a commercial chain speed;
further wherein the act of separating is conducted without the separation of a
substantial portion of the connective tissue, fat, or minor muscles adjacent
the vertebra.
12. The method of claim 11 wherein the act of separating the at least one
vertebra
includes separating a vertebral column and a spinal process.
13. The methid of claim 11 further comprising moving the carcass on a
processing
chain line at a chain speed of at least 150 head per hour.
14. The method of claim 11 wherein the commercial chain speed is at feast 350
head
per hour.
36




15. The method of claim 14 wherein the commercial chain speed is at least 600
head
per hour.
16. The method of claim 11 further comprising electrically stimulating the
carcass after
the act of separating the at least one vertebra.
17. The method of claim 11 wherein the act of separating is performed on a
thirteenth
thoracic vertebra of the carcass.
18. The method of claim 11 wherein the act of separating includes separating a
twelfth
thoracic vertebra and a thirteenth rib of the carcass.
19. The method of claim 11 wherein the act of separating is performed on one
or more
vertebrae posterior to a thirteenth rib and anterior to a second lumbar
vertebra.
20. The method of claim 11 wherein the act of separating is conducted without
separating the multifidus dorsi muscle or the intercostal muscles of the
carcass.
21. A method for tenderizing meat in a red meat slaughter animal, the method
comprising:
separating at least one vertebra of a carcass of a red meat slaughter animal
prior
to rigor mortis to enable stretching of muscle fibers in the carcass; and
applying electrical stimulation to the carcass;
wherein the acts of separating and applying are conducted at a commercial
chain
speed; and
further wherein the act of separating is conducted without separating the
multifidus dorsi muscle and the intercostal muscles of the carcass.
37

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.




CA 02393768 2002-06-07
WO 01/54509 PCT/USO1/02599
Title: METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR TENDERIZING MEAT
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates generally to food processing, particularly
meat processing and improving the tenderness of meat. More particularly, the
invention relates to methods and apparatuses for improving meat tenderness
through manipulation of an animal carcass or portions thereof prior to rigor
mortis, including separation of one or more vertebrae of a carcass.
Consumers of meat products generally prefer tender meat.
Inadequate tenderness is therefore an important quality control concern for
meat
producers, particularly red meat producers. In addition, a large amount of
variation may exist in the tenderness of meat cuts at retail and food service
levels. Improvements in the tenderness of meat products would allow a meat
producer to increase both the quantity of meat products sold and the price at
which those products are sold.
A number of factors influence the tenderness of meat, including
genetics, the age of the animal at slaughter, the breed of the animal, the
animal's
health, whether the animal is range fed or fed cereal grains, the amount of
growth
hormones administered to the animal, and the climate. Genetics may account for
around thirty percent of the influence on meat tenderness, with other factors
accounting for the remaining seventy percent. Older animals typically produce
tougher, less tender meat than do younger animals. If an animal is in poor
health, the meat -resulting from that animal may be less tender. If an animal
receives a large amount of growth hormones during the animal's life, the meat
resulting from that animal may be less tender. Certain types of cattle, such
as



CA 02393768 2002-06-07
WO 01/54509 PCT/USO1/02599
Brahman, generally produce less tender meat than do other cattle. Cattle with
larger hump heights generally are more likely to be Brahman cattle or have a
hereditary link to Brahman cattle, and therefore typically produce less tender
meat.
A variety of methods have been used in an attempt to improve the
tenderness of red meat products, including electrical stimulation of pre-rigor
carcasses, chemical injections, maceration, and various feeding techniques.
Methods involving chemical injections have been devised that may be conducted
on animals prior to slaughter and also on carcasses after slaughter. Some of
these techniques involve injections of brine solutions, such as calcium
chloride, in
an effort to increase tenderness. Other methods involve the injection of
enzymes
or chemicals into an animal or a carcass to improve meat tenderness. Dietary
supplements include the administration of Vitamin D or its analogs or
derivatives
to livestock, as is described in U.S. Patent 5,968,565 to Owens et al.
Maceration
techniques commonly involve penetration of the meat with needles or the like
to
increase tenderness.
The methods for tenderizing meat discussed above have a number
of disadvantages. These methods are generally expensive and labor intensive,
and hence are not viable for commercial production of meat products. Expenses
include labor costs for injections, feed supplements, maceration techniques,
as
well as equipment and chemical, enzyme, or feed supplement costs. In addition,
the consuming public may be concerned with the safety of the use of chemicals,
enzymes, or feed supplements. Further, the effectiveness of the above methods
may be questioned and the administration of these techniques may be complex
to control.
2



CA 02393768 2002-06-07
WO 01/54509 PCT/USO1/02599
Postmortem aging of meat is another common technique for
tenderizing meat. Meat may be aged for a variable period of time (in the area
of
from three to ninety-nine days) to increase meat tenderness, depending on the
type of animal and the cut of meat. Aging increases tenderness because
enzymatic degradation of muscle fibers occurs. Aging of meat, however, has
disadvantages. First, the longer meat is aged, the larger the amount of
moisture
that is lost from the meat, thus influencing the palatability of the meat.
Second,
there is a storage -cost for aging meat in commercial meat production. Third,
aging of meat influences the shelf life of the meat product. If meat is aged
for a
large amount of time, for instance, the shelf life of the product will
decrease, and
the meat may also not look as appetizing (the color may be altered) as meat
that
has not been aged as long.
In addition to those methods discussed above for improving the
tenderness of meat, another method described by Claus and Marriot, referred to
as the "Tendercut Process" and available on the Internet at
<www.fst.vt.edu/files/tendercu.html>, has been proposed to increase the
tenderness of beef. In the Tendercut Process, a beef carcass is manipulated
after slaughter and prior to rigor mortis. After the beef carcass has been
split in
half (by sawing the carcass midway through the spinal column to form a left
side
and a right side), the Tendercut Process involves making one or two detailed
cuts. One cut is made between the fourth and fifth sacral vertebrae of the
carcass, and involves a complete cut of the sacral vertebrae and all fat,
connective tissue, and minor muscles surrounding the wholesale round muscles
of the beef carcass. A second cut is made between the twelfth and thirteenth
ribs
of the carcass, and involves a complete cut of the vertebral column and the
spinal
3



CA 02393768 2002-06-07
WO 01/54509 PCT/USO1/02599
processes, as well as all fat, connective tissue, intercostal muscles, and
minor
muscles surrounding the longissimus dorsi. After the carcass is cut, a
separation
between bones and tissues in the location of the cut of between 4-6 inches
results, thus stretching the muscle prior to rigor mortis to reduce shortening
of the
muscle fiber during chilling of the carcass.
The Tendercut Process, has a number of disadvantages for the
commercial production of meat products. A large number of procedures are
required in this process, including sawing the vertebrae with a saw and
cutting
the minor muscles, fat, and connective tissue with a knife. This method is
very
time consuming due to the number of knife cuts required, thus requiring a
large
expenditure for labor if used in a commercial meat production facility. In
addition,
due to the number and complexity of the saws and cuts that are required, a
significant chance of damage to the primary muscles results (those muscles for
which stretching is desired to increase tenderness, e.g., the longissimus
dorsi
and round muscles of beef carcasses). Moreover, this method may alter the
appearance of the muscles and fat assigned by the USDA graders (quality and
grade) because the location of the cut between the twelfth and thirteenth ribs
is
the area evaluated for USDA grades. The Tendercut Process has not been
adopted widely in.commercial processes.
U.S. Patent 3,579,716 to Stouffer et al. ("Stoufffer '715") issued on
May 25, 1971, discloses another meat tenderizing method. The Stouffer patent
discloses tenderizing a muscle in the following manner: "The backbone - which
is visible on the split carcass half - is severed (preferably at several
spaced
locations), whereby the weight of the carcass half is sufficient to extend and
maintain tension on the longissimus muscle during the passage of rigor
mortis."
4



CA 02393768 2002-06-07
WO 01/54509 PCT/USO1/02599
Stouffer '716, col. 4, II. 21-25. Stouffer '716 also discloses that additional
weights
may be added to the carcass for further tensioning. When the application for
Stouffer '716 was filed in 1969, commercial meat production facilities were
vastly
different than today. Typically, chains were not used to transport animal
carcasses in 1969 and slaughter and production rates were significantly slower
than today. Stouffer '716, therefore, does not disclose a tenderizing method
that
may be readily used in commercial meat production facilities today. In
addition,
animals, for example, cattle for beef production, were not administered growth
hormones in 1969. as is common today. The beef resulting from the carcasses in
1969, therefore, differed in many properties, including tenderness, from beef
today, and hence treatment of carcasses today differs from treatment of
carcasses in 1969.
A need exists for methods and apparatuses for improving the
tenderness of meat that are inexpensive and commercially practical, easy and
quick to conduct, not significantly invasive, and that will not raise concerns
with
the consuming public about additives to meat products.
BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
One embodiment of the invention is a method for tenderizing meat.
In this embodiment, the invention includes manipulating, particularly
separating
one or more vertebrae of a carcass of a red meat slaughter animal prior to
rigor
mortis, wherein the act of separating is conducted at a commercial chain
speed.
In another embodiment of the invention, the separation of the one or more
vertebrae may be conducted without separating the connective tissue, fat, and
minor muscles on the portion of the carcass opposite the vertebrae or, in
another
embodiment, only the connective tissue and fat adjacent the vertebrae are
5


CA 02393768 2005-11-17
separated during separation of the one or more vertebrae and the separation of
this
connective tissue and fat is incidental to the vertebrae separation. The
separation of the
vertebrae results in increased meat tenderness.
Another embodiment of the invention is a carcass of a red meat slaughter
animal,
wherein one or more vertebrae of the carcass have been separated prior to
rigor mortis,
and wherein the one or more vertebrae have been separated at a commercial
chain
speed.
The present invention also encompasses an apparatus for separating one or more
vertebrae of a carcass. In one embodiment, the apparatus comprises a carcass
contacting plate, an operating member operably coupled to the plate, and a
drive
mechanism operably coupled to the operating member for driving the operating
member
into a carcass to manipulate a vertebra or vertebrae. In one embodiment, the
apparatus
includes a plate or plate system comprising two plate members for contacting
or
mounting to the carcass, a wedge-shaped piercing member movably connected to
the
plate system, and a drive mechanism system operably coupled to the piercing
member
for driving it through one or more vertebrae of the carcass to achieve
separation of the
one or more vertebrae during use of the apparatus. This embodiment of the
invention
provides for repeatable separations of the one or more vertebrae of a carcass
without
risking damage to the major muscles of the carcass. Tn addition, thts
apparatus allows
for fast separation of the vertebrae for use during commercial meat production
processes.
In another aspect, the present invention provides a method for tenderizing
meat
in a red meat slaughter animal, the method comprising: separating 2t least one
vertebra
6


CA 02393768 2005-11-17
of a carcass of a red meat slaughter animal prior to cigar mortis to enable
stretching of ..
muscle fibers in the carcass; wherein the act of separating is conducted at a
commercial
chain speed; further wherein the act of separating is conducted without
separating
connective tissue, fat, or minor muscles on a portion of the carcass opposite
the _
vertebra. -
In another aspect, the present invention provides a method of tendering meat
in
a red meat slaughter animal, the method comprising: separating at least one
vertebra of
a carcass of a red meat slaughter animal prior to rigor mortis to enable
stretching of
muscle fibers in the carcass; wherein the act of separating is conducted at a
commercial
chain speed; further wherein the act of separating is conducted without
separating the
multifidus dorsi muscle and the intercostal muscles of the carcass.
In another aspect, the present invention provides a method for tenderizing
meat
in a red meat slaughter animal, the method comprising: separating at least one
vertebra
of a carcass of a red meat slaughter animal prior to rigor mortis to enable
stretching of
muscle fibers in the carcass; wherein the act of separating is conducted at a
commercial
chain speed; further wherein the act of separating is conducted without the
separation
of a substantial portion of the connective tissue, fat, or minor muscles
adjacent the -
vertebra.
In another aspect, the present invention provides a method for tenderizing
meat
in a red meat slaughter animal, the method comprising: separating at least one
vertebra
of a carcass of a red meat slaughter animal prior to rigor mortis to enable
stretching of
muscle fibers in the carcass; and applying electrical stimulation to the
carcass; wherein


CA 02393768 2005-11-17
further wherein the act of separating is conducted without separating the
multifidus
dorsi muscle and the intercostal muscles of the carcass.
Still other embodiments of the present invention wiH become
apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description,
wherein
is shown and described only the embodiments of the invention by way of
6b



CA 02393768 2002-06-07
WO 01/54509 PCT/LTSO1/02599
illustration of the best modes contemplated for carrying out the invention. As
will
be realized, the invention is capable of modification in various obvious
aspects,
all without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention.
Accordingly, the drawings and detailed description are to be regarded as
illustrative in nature and not restrictive.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a side view of a beef carcass illustrating the bone structure
of the carcass.
FIG. 2 is a top view of blade chuck steak as cut approximately
along line A-A of FIG. 1.
FIG. 3 is a top view of rib steak as cut approximately along line B-B
of FIG. 1.
FIG. 4 is a top view of porterhouse steak as cut approximately
along line C-C of FIG. 1.
FIG. 5 is a top view of wedge bone sirloin steak as cut
approximately along line D-D of FIG. 1.
FIG. 6 is a perspective view of an apparatus of the invention.
FIG. 7 is a front view of the apparatus of FIG. 6.
FIG. 8 is a top view of the apparatus of FIG. 6.
FIG. 9 is a side view of the apparatus of FIG. 6.
FIG. 10 is a view of the apparatus of FIG. 13 in operation prior to
entry of the wedge into a beef carcass.
FIG. .11 is a view of the apparatus of FIG. 13 in operation with the
wedge partially entered into a beef carcass.
7



CA 02393768 2002-06-07
WO 01/54509 PCT/USO1/02599
FIG.-12 is a view of the apparatus of FIG. 13 in operation with the
wedge fully into a beef carcass.
FIG. 13 is a perspective view of a second apparatus of the
invention.
FIG. 14 is a front view of the apparatus of FIG. 13.
FIG. 15 is a top view of the apparatus of FIG. 13.
FIG. 16 is a side view of the apparatus of FIG. 13.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
Throughout this specification, the term "red meat slaughter animal"
is used to refer to an animal that is slaughtered for red meat consumption,
including but not limited to all age classes of bovine, porcine, and ovine
animals.
In this specification, bovine animals include, but are not limited to, cattle,
steers,
heifers, cows, bulls, and also buffalo. Porcine animals include, but are not
limited
to, sows, gilts, barrows, boars, and feeder pigs. Ovine animals include, but
are
not limited to, sheep and Iamb. The present invention applies to the
production of
tenderized red meat products from such red meat slaughter animals and possibly
to the production of tenderized meat from other animals as well, such as
poultry.
Although portions of this detailed description depict and describe embodiments
of
the invention dealing with beef or beef carcasses, these references to beef
should not be read to limit the invention to the production of beef products.
Rather, this specification should be read as applying to any animal, including
a
red meat slaughter animal.
8


CA 02393768 2005-11-17
A. General O~ervriew
One embodiment of the present invention is a method for tenderizing
meat in which one or more vertebrae of the carcass are separated prior to
rigor mortis.
Such a separation may be pertvrmed during commercial beef production, which
Involves
a number of standard steps, and the separation may be performed at a
commercial
chin speed. The cattle are first stunned and then bled. Next, the hide is
stripped from
the beef carcass and the head, extremities, and viscera are removed. The beef
carcass is
then sawed in half, thus producing two sides of beef, with each side
containing half of
the vertebral column and sternum, and each side being generally symmetric with
the
other side. Throughout this specification, the term "carcass" will be used to
refer to the
corpse of a slaughtered animal, and may include a whole corpse of the animal
or a side
of the animal that results from splitting a whole carcass into two sides.
After a beef carcass is split into two sides, each side (or carcass) is
washed and then optionally pasteurized, commonly using a steam pasteurization
system.
In some beef production processes, the carcasses are subjected to electrical
stimulation
in an effort to tenderize the meat of the carcass. In some electrical
stimulation
processes, electrical stimulation is applied to the carcass at ffty volts for
approximately
thirty to sixty seconds. An electrical stimulation procedure and apparatus is
described in
U.S. Patent No. 6,290,592, filed May 1, 2000, issued September 18, 2001.
One embodiment of the invention is a method for tenderizing meat. In
this embodiment, a vertebra of the carcass is separated prior to rigor mortis.
In
9



CA 02393768 2002-06-07
WO 01/54509 PCT/USO1/02599
another embodiment, two vertebrae are separated prior to rigor mortis. In any
embodiment, separation is accomplished by breaking, snapping, sawing,
piercing, severing, parting, detaching, shearing, or removing a single
vertebra or
portions thereof, or it is accomplished by breaking, snapping, sawing,
piercing,
severing, parting, detaching, shearing, or removing two vertebrae or portions
thereof.
Although the reason vertebra or vertebrae separation increases
meat tenderness is not definitively known, the applicants believe that the
separation of the vertebra or vertebrae causes the weight of the portion of
the
carcass below the separation to pull on the muscle fibers adjacent to the
separation, thus causing a stretching of muscle fibers in the carcass and
increased meat tenderness as a result. This separation of the vertebra or
vertebrae and stretching of the muscle fiber is, in one embodiment, done soon
after the animal is slaughtered and prior to rigor mortis so that the muscle
fiber
may be stretched. The vertebra or vertebrae of the carcass (shown in Fig. 1 )
may be separated in any location, including in the sacral vertebrae, lumbar
vertebrae, or thoracic vertebrae. It should be noted, however, that the
location of
the separation may determine the muscle that is stretched and hence tenderized
by the vertebra or .vertebrae separation. Throughout this specification, the
term
"vertebrae" will be used to refer to two or more of the sacral vertebrae,
lumbar
vertebrae, or thoracic vertebrae. The term "vertebra" will be used to refer to
a
single sacral vertebra, lumbar vertebra, or thoracic vertebra.
10



CA 02393768 2002-06-07
WO 01/54509 PCT/USO1/02599
another embodiment, two vertebrae are separated prior to rigor mortis. In any
embodiment, separation is accomplished by breaking, snapping, sawing,
piercing, severing, parting, detaching, shearing, or removing a single
vertebra or
portions thereof, or it is accomplished by breaking, snapping, sawing,
piercing,
severing, parting, detaching, shearing, or removing two vertebrae or portions
thereof.
Although the reason vertebra or vertebrae separation increases
meat tenderness is not definitively known, the applicants believe that the
separation of the vertebra or vertebrae causes the weight of the portion of
the
carcass below the separation to pull on the muscle fibers adjacent to the
separation, thus causing a stretching of muscle fibers in the carcass and
increased meat tenderness as a result. This separation of the vertebra or
vertebrae and stretching of the muscle fiber is, in one embodiment, done soon
after the animal is slaughtered and prior to rigor mortis so that the muscle
fiber
may be stretched. The vertebra or vertebrae of the carcass (shown in Fig. 1 )
may be separated in any location, including in the sacral vertebrae, lumbar
vertebrae, or thoracic vertebrae. It should be noted, however, that the
location of
the separation may determine the muscle that is stretched and hence tenderized
by the vertebra or vertebrae separation. Throughout this specification, the
term
"vertebrae" will be used to refer to two or more of the sacral vertebrae,
lumbar
vertebrae, or thoracic vertebrae. The term "vertebra" will be used to refer to
a
single sacral vertebra, lumbar vertebra, or thoracic vertebra.
11



CA 02393768 2002-06-07
WO 01/54509 PCT/USO1/02599
1. Separating the Vertebra or Vertebrae
Any method known to those skilled in the art may be used to
separate the vertebra or vertebrae of the carcass, including sawing, chopping,
cutting, or possibly crushing, and any tool used in the art may therefore be
used
to perform the separation. To perform the separation, sawing may be performed
using any type of saw known to those skilled in the art, including a circular
saw,
splitting saw, or a hack saw, as commonly used in the meat industry. Cutting
or
snipping to perform the separation may be done using a clipper or scissors or
any
other device known to those skilled in the art. Chopping to perform the
separation may be done using an ax or chopping device of any sort known to
those skilled in the art.
Another method to separate the vertebra or vertebrae is through
piercing or driving a wedge through the vertebra to break the vertebra into
one or
more portions, for example an upper portion and a lower portion. A wedge could
also be used to pierce or drive between two vertebrae to separate the
vertebrae.
Separated portions of a vertebra or separated vertebrae may be removed.
"Separation" is intended to encompass removal of a vertebra, pieces of
vertebra,
vertebrae or pieces or sections of vertebrae. Section C of this specification
and
FIGS. 6-16 detail two embodiments of an apparatus for separating the vertebra
or
vertebrae of a carcass, which may include driving a linear or rotational wedge
into
a vertebra or between vertebrae to achieve splitting, separation, or spacing,
and
also to provide an initial stretch of the muscle fiber.
In one embodiment, one simple cut, saw, pierce, or slice may be
used to separate the vertebra or vertebrae of the carcass. In this embodiment,
the minor muscles, fat, and connective tissues surrounding the major muscles
in
12



CA 02393768 2002-06-07
WO 01/54509 PCT/USO1/02599
the area of the vertebra or vertebrae separation do not need to be separated.
In
another embodiment, only a minimal amount of the minor muscles, connective
tissues, and fat are separated. In these embodiments, the only separation or
the
primary separation is the splitting or dividing of a vertebra and the
separation or
spacing of the pieces of the vertebra, or the splitting or dividing of
vertebrae or
the separation or further spacing of the vertebrae.
In one embodiment of the present invention, a circular saw is used
to separate the vertebrae. The first cut is generally horizontal and cut to a
depth
(limited by the use of a guide, for example) to completely severe the vertebra
with
minimal invasion into the surrounding musculature. In one embodiment, the cut
is made from the split side face of the carcass by moving the saw from the
stomach side toward the back side of the carcass. In another embodiment, a
second cut is then made at an angle generally parallel to the angle of the
feather
bones. This second cut is made generally in the area between the feather bones
to effect further structural separation. In another embodiment, a separate
blade
or knife is used to separate the area between the feather bones. In one
embodiment of the present invention, the saw does not separate the chine of
the
lumbar, and the chine is separated by snipping.
These embodiments of the invention, therefore, may be carried out
during commercial meat production processes without disrupting the chain speed
at which carcasses move. In commercial beef production, for instance,
carcasses typically move along a single chain or line at the rate of 150-600
head
of cattle per hour, more particularly 200-400 head of cattle per hour, and
even
more particularly 250-350 head of cattle per hour, although this rate may vary
widely.
13



CA 02393768 2002-06-07
WO 01/54509 PCT/USO1/02599
To make separation of the vertebra or vertebrae a viable
commercial process for increasing the tenderness of meat, it is helpful for
the
vertebra or vertebrae separation to be a quick operation so that the
separation
may be performed on carcasses at speeds that equal the chain speed of the
processing line, or at commercial chain speeds. Throughout this specification,
the phrase "commercial chain speed" will be used to refer to the chain speed,
such as those detailed above for beef production, at which carcasses typically
move along a meat processing line in modern production facilities. If detailed
cutting of minor muscles, tissue, and fat surrounding major muscles is used, a
large amount of labor and time may be required, thus making it costly and/or
impractical for use at typical chain speeds in a commercial slaughter
facility.
Substantial differences exist between the method for tenderizing
meat disclosed in this specification and that disclosed by Claus and Marriott
in
the Tendercut Process. In one embodiment of the invention, only the vertebra
or
vertebrae and not all minor muscles, connective tissue, and fat are separated,
which contrasts with the Tendercut Process described by Claus and Marriott,
where the major muscle (such as the longissimus dorsi) entirely supports the
remainder of the carcass because the remaining muscles, connective tissue,
adipose tissue, and fat are separated. In one embodiment, the act of
separating
one or more vertebrae is conducted without separation of a substantial portion
of
the connective tissue, fat, and minor muscles adjacent the vertebrae
separation.
The method of one embodiment of the invention therefore saves time and
reduces costs, and hence it is more viable for commercial meat production
processes. The method of the invention may also be significantly easier to
perform because a large number of cuts, severs, and muscle separations are not
14



CA 02393768 2002-06-07
WO 01/54509 PCT/USO1/02599
necessary as for the Claus and Marriot Tendercut Process, which is an invasive
process requiring many detailed cuts. The Tendercut Process, for instance,
requires at least two steps - first, sawing the vertebrae with a saw, and
second,
cutting muscle, tissue, and fat with a knife in numerous locations. The
increased
simplicity of the method of the invention also decreases the chance of damage
to
major muscles of the carcass, which could result in decreased meat quality and
hence lost value. Further, the method of the invention offers the benefits of
moving and swinging of the carcass along an automated chain or line during
commercial meat production, thus further aiding in stretching the muscle. The
Tendercut Process disclosed by Claus and Marriot, on the other hand, discloses
a hanging beef carcass in a laboratory setting, not in a commercial production
process, and hence it is not subjected to swinging and moving of the carcass.
In
addition, the method of the invention differs from the Stouffer patent in that
the
method of the invention is suitable for use in today's commercial meat
production
facilities. Other advantages and benefits of the embodiments of the invention
disclosed throughout this specification will be apparent to one skilled in the
art.
In some embodiments of the present invention, a portion of the fat,
minor muscles, and connective tissue surrounding the major muscle or muscles
in the area of the vertebra or vertebrae separation may also be separated or
affected during the separation process. In other embodiments, the fat, minor
muscles, and connective tissue on the portion of the carcass opposite the
vertebrae will not be separated or significantly affected. Because fat, minor
muscles, and connective tissue surround the entire major muscle, separating
such fat, minor muscles, and connective tissue would be a time consuming and
therefore expensive procedure, and would be difficult to perform at commercial



CA 02393768 2002-06-07
WO 01/54509 PCT/USO1/02599
one of the first, second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth, ninth,
tenth,
eleventh, twelfth, or thirteenth thoracic vertebra 14. Alternatively, a
separation
may be performed between any two thoracic vertebrae 14 (for example, between
the fifth and sixth thoracic vertebrae 14), or posterior to one of the first
or
thirteenth vertebra 14. It is to be understood, therefore, that a vertebra or
vertebrae separation may be performed at any location on the spinal column.
To stretch a muscle and hence tenderize the meat resulting from
that muscle, a vertebra or vertebrae separation may be performed. To stretch
the longissimus dorsi muscle 40, which is shown in FIGS. 2-4, a vertebra or
vertebrae separation is made along a portion of the lumbar vertebrae 16 or
thoracic vertebrae 14 of the carcass. The longissimus dorsi muscle 40 is the
major muscle in the area of such a separation, and also the muscle from which
a
significant portion of the high quality meat from a beef carcass results. In
one
embodiment, the vertebra or vertebrae separation may be made posterior to the
thirteenth rib 22 of the carcass and anterior to the second lumbar vertebra
16,
approximately in the area indicated by letter E in FIG. 1. This embodiment
avoids
damage to the area of the carcass (between the twelfth and thirteenth ribs)
where
beef carcasses are "ribbed" for USDA grading. In other embodiments, the
vertebra or vertebrae separation may be made between the ninth and tenth ribs
22 of the carcass, approximately in the area indicated by line B-B in FIG. 1
(separation of the chine and featherbones). Another possibility is to separate
the
vertebra or vertebrae between the fifth and sixth ribs 22, which is
approximately
in the area indicated by letter F in FIG. 1.
In addition, more than one separation may be made, with each
separation being made at a different location along any point of the vertebrae
of
16



CA 02393768 2002-06-07
WO 01/54509 PCT/USO1/02599
chain speeds. In addition, performing such separations increase the chance of
damage to major muscles, which can be costly errors due to damaged meat
products.
FIG. 1 shows a side view of a beef carcass 10. As illustrated, the
skeletal structure includes cervical vertebrae 12, thoracic vertebrae 14, and
lumbar vertebrae 16, and sacral vertebrae 18. FIG. 1 further shows the ribs
22.
FIGS. 2-5 illustrate various cuts of meat corresponding
approximately to cross section lines A-A, B-B, C-C, and D-D of FIG. 1. FIGS. 2-
5
are cross-sectional views that illustrate the skeletal and muscular structure
in
various locations of a beef carcass. FIG. 2, for instance, illustrates a blade
chuck
steak 30, which results from a cut approximately along line A-A of FIG. 1.
FIG. 3
illustrates a rib steak 32, which results from a cut approximately along line
B-B of
FIG. 1. FIG. 4 illustrates a porterhouse steak 34, which results from a cut
approximately along line C-C of FIG. 1, and FIG. 5 illustrates a wedge bone
sirloin steak 36, which results from a cut approximately along line D-D of
FIG. 1.
Vertebral separations may be performed at any point along the
vertebrae of the carcass. For instance, for a beef carcass, any one of the
first,
second, third, fourth, or fifth sacral vertebra 18 may be separated.
Alternatively,
a separation may be performed between any two sacral vertebrae 18 (for
example, between the third and fourth sacral vertebrae), or posterior to one
of the
first or fifth sacral vertebra 18. A separation may also be performed on any
one
of the first, second, third, fourth, fifth, or sixth lumbar vertebra 16.
Alternatively, a
separation may be performed between any two lumbar vertebrae 16 (for
example, between the fourth and fifth lumbar vertebrae 16), or posterior to
one of
the first or sixth lumbar vertebra 16. A separation may also be performed on
any
17



CA 02393768 2002-06-07
WO 01/54509 PCT/USO1/02599
one of the first, second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth, ninth,
tenth,
eleventh, twelfth, or thirteenth thoracic vertebra 14. Alternatively, a
separation
may be performed between any two thoracic vertebrae 14 (for example, between
the fifth and sixth thoracic vertebrae 14), or posterior to one of the first
or
thirteenth vertebra 14. It is to be understood, therefore, that a vertebra or
vertebrae separation may be performed at any location on the spinal column.
To stretch a muscle and hence tenderize the meat resulting from
that muscle, a vertebra or vertebrae separation may be performed. To stretch
the longissimus dorsi muscle 40, which is shown in FIGS. 2-4, a vertebra or
vertebrae separation is made along a portion of the lumbar vertebrae 16 or
thoracic vertebrae-14 of the carcass. The longissimus dorsi muscle 40 is the
major muscle in the area of such a separation, and also the muscle from which
a
significant portion of the high quality meat from a beef carcass results. In
one
embodiment, the vertebra or vertebrae separation may be made posterior to the
thirteenth rib 22 of the carcass and anterior to the second lumbar vertebra
16,
approximately in the -area indicated by letter E in FIG. 1. This embodiment
avoids
damage to the area of the carcass (between the twelfth and thirteenth ribs)
where
beef carcasses are "ribbed" for USDA grading. In other embodiments, the
vertebra or vertebrae separation may be made between the ninth and tenth ribs
22 of the carcass, approximately in the area indicated by line B-B in FIG. 1
(separation of the chine and featherbones). Another possibility is to separate
the
vertebra or vertebrae between the fifth and sixth ribs 22, which is
approximately
in the area indicated by letter F in FIG. 1.
In addition, more than one separation may be made, with each
separation being made at a different location along any point of the vertebrae
of
18



CA 02393768 2002-06-07
WO 01/54509 PCT/USO1/02599
the carcass. In one embodiment, in order to maximize the advantages of the
invention, vertebra or vertebrae separations may be made at lower portions of
the
vertebrae before higher vertebrae separations. It should be noted that
vertebral
separations made at letters E or F, or line B-B, in FIG. 1 result primarily in
a
stretching of the longissimus dorsi muscle 40. Vertebral separations along
certain points of the lumbar vertebrae 16 without further separation of minor
muscles, tissue, and fat, result in separations or spaces of approximately one
and
a half inches, with such separations or spaces being measured from the face of
the sever on one portion of the separated vertebra to the face on the other
portion of the separated vertebra or the distance between two separated
vertebrae.
In order to stretch the muscles in the round portion of the carcass,
which may be seen in FIG. 5, a vertebral separation may be made along a
portion of the sacral vertebrae 18. Once again, a vertebral separation may be
made along any portion of the sacral vertebrae 18, including in the portion
indicated by line D-D in FIG. 1, in order to stretch the muscles in the round
of the
carcass.
In making the vertebral separations, in some embodiments of the
invention, care is taken to avoid severing the major muscles in the area of
the
vertebral separation. For this reason, in one embodiment of the invention,
only
the vertebra or vertebrae-and not all minor muscles, fat, and connective
tissue
adjacent the major,muscle -are separated. For example, as shown in FIG. 3,
only a single thoracic vertebra 14 or two thoracic vertebrae 14 need be
separated, and not the multifidus dorsi 42, spinalis dorsi 44, or other minor
muscles in the portion of the carcass opposite the vertebrae. In addition, the
fat
19



CA 02393768 2002-06-07
WO 01/54509 PCT/USO1/02599
and connective tissue surrounding the major muscle (the longissimus dorsi
muscle 40 in FIG. 3) need not be separated, aside from the fat and connective
tissue that is incidentally separated during separation of the vertebra or
vertebrae. Although portions of the fat, connective tissue, and minor muscles
may be severed or partially separated during the process of vertebral
separation,
no special effort need be made to separate these areas in one embodiment of
the
invention.
In some embodiments of the present invention, the vertebra or
vertebrae separation includes the separation of the entire bone structure of
the
vertebra or vertebrae. In some embodiments, the present invention involves the
splitting of a single vertebra into two or more pieces, or the splitting
and/or
increased spacing between two vertebrae. In any embodiment, the present
invention involves disruption and/or dislocation of a normal vertebra or the
normal
relationship between vertebrae. For examples, a vertebra or vertebrae
separation could include a complete separation and/or removal of the vertebral
column, thoracic vertebra or vertebrae, and/or the spinal processes adjacent
the
vertebral column.
Another embodiment of the present invention is a red meat
slaughter animal carcass, wherein a vertebra or the vertebrae of the carcass
have been separated prior to rigor mortis to increase meat tenderness through
muscle fiber elongation.



CA 02393768 2002-06-07
WO 01/54509 PCT/USO1/02599
2. Stretching of the Muscle Fibers
The separation of the vertebra or vertebrae causes the weight of
the portion of the carcass below the separation to pull on the muscle fibers
adjacent to the separation, thus causing a stretching of muscle fibers in the
carcass. Separation of the vertebra or vertebrae results in the extension of
the
length or tearing of the sarcomeres (muscle fiber complex) and therefore
increases tenderness of the resulting meat.
Although the timing of the vertebra or vertebrae separation
(measured in the amount of time after slaughter) may vary, the separation, in
one
embodiment, is made in order to maximize the muscle stretch. To optimize the
muscle stretch and hence the resulting tenderness of the meat, vertebra or
vertebrae separation is typically performed prior to completion of rigor
mortis of
the carcass (pre-rigor), which typically takes place within approximately 3-24
hours after slaughter. After rigor mortis, muscle fibers will be immobilized
and
hence vertebra or vertebrae separation will have a limited effect on meat
tenderness.
During the commercial production of meat, vertebra or vertebrae
separation in accordance with this specification may be made at any time prior
to
rigor mortis. In some typical commercial processes, carcasses are steam
pasteurized approximately thirty to sixty minutes after slaughter and prior to
being
chilled. Electrical stimulation may be performed on the carcasses either
before or
after steam pasteurization, or both before and after pasteurization. Although
vertebra or vertebrae separation may be performed at any time after slaughter
and prior to rigor mortis in accordance with the invention, in one embodiment,
vertebra or vertebrae separation may be performed after steam pasteurization
21



CA 02393768 2002-06-07
WO 01/54509 PCT/USO1/02599
and prior to chilling of the carcass. In such an embodiment, electrical
stimulation
may be performed on the carcass either before or after vertebra or vertebrae
separation to further increase tenderness of the meat. In another embodiment,
vertebral separation is performed first, followed by electrical stimulation
and
steam pasteurization.
In one embodiment of the present invention, vertebral separation is
performed first, followed by electrical stimulation followed by steam
pasteurization. An advantage of performing vertebral separation prior to
electrical stimulation is that, in some instances, the prior separation
enhances the
beneficial effects of electrical stimulation. Namely, the muscles are more
able to
contract and relax, resulting in increased glycogen depletion, and the muscles
are able to physically stretch more post-separation. In another embodiment,
steam pasteurization is performed prior to vertebral separation and electrical
stimulation.
Although the weight of the carcass and electrical stimulation may
result in a muscle stretch after vertebral separation, other processes may
also aid
in stretching the muscle after separation. One such process is the moving or
swinging of the carcass along a rail line or chain. Such movement may enhance
the muscle stretch through jarring and motion, and such moving or swinging may
be carried out during commercial production processes in which the carcass
moves along at the operating chain speed. Further, in some embodiments,
weights could be attached to the lower portion of the carcass in order to
increase
the muscle stretch, thus increasing the resulting meat tenderness. In other
embodiments, however, no weights, aside from the carcass weight, are
necessary in order to increase meat tenderness.
22



CA 02393768 2002-06-07
WO 01/54509 PCT/USO1/02599
The vertebral separation method of the invention may be combined
with other meat tenderization programs to increase meat tenderness. Breed and
hump height programs for beef cattle, for instance, may be used with the
vertebral separation method to increase meat tenderness. In addition, feed
supplements or programs or chemical injections on live animals may also be
used with the vertebral separation method of the invention. Aging of meat
products may be used as well with the vertebral separation method of the
invention.
The invention, as described above, offers numerous advantages
over the previous tenderizing methods. First, no chemicals, enzymes, or other
supplements are fed to the animal or injected into meat to increase
tenderness,
and the consuming public will therefore not be concerned about the effects of
such chemicals, enzymes, or residues. Second, because no chemicals,
enzymes, or supplements are used, there is no production cost for such
materials. Third, the methods in these embodiments may be performed quickly
and are relatively easy to perform, thus allowing the methods to be performed
during commercial processes for the production of meat products at high chain
speeds. Finally, because a minimal number of separations are performed and
may be performed relatively easily, there is a decreased chance of damaging
major muscles during meat production. Damage to major muscles significantly
decreases the value of the carcass for commercial meat production.
Another advantage of the methods of the invention is that higher
quality cuts of meat may result. The stretching or elongation of a muscle of a
carcass results in an elongated muscle with a smaller diameter than the muscle
would have without vertebral separation and stretching of the muscle. When the
23



CA 02393768 2002-06-07
WO 01/54509 PCT/USO1/02599
elongated muscle is cut or partitioned into a cut of meat, therefore, the cut
of
meat will need to be thicker in order to have the same weight as a cut of meat
from a muscle that has not been elongated. For example, an eight ounce steak
may be one and a half inches thick from a muscle that has not been elongated,
and an eight ounce steak from the same area of an elongated muscle may be
two inches thick (with a decreased diameter or circumference).
Cuts of meat that result from the method of the invention, therefore,
may be thicker, while still having the same portion size (weight) as a cut of
meat
from a carcass that is not subjected to the method of the invention. A thicker
cut
of meat is generally more appealing to consumers, in part because of the
visual
qualities of such a cut of meat. In addition, the thicker cut of meat is
generally
better for cooking because a decreased amount of moisture will likely be
evaporated or cooked out of the meat cut during cooking. Thicker meat cuts can
typically withstand harsher cooking conditions, while maintaining tenderness
and
juiciness. The combined benefits of this aspect of the invention, therefore,
may
allow for higher priced meat cuts that are of the same weight as meat cuts
from
carcasses that are not subjected to the invention, which may be important for
commercial meat production.
B. Experimental Examples
The applicants discovered the effect of vertebral separation on
meat tenderness accidentally during tests to determine the effect of
electrical
stimulation on meat tenderness. In the electrical stimulation tests, sixty-
seven
whole carcasses were tested, with sixty-seven sides used as a control group,
thirty-two sides being subjected to fifty volts for thirty seconds, and thirty-
five
24



CA 02393768 2002-06-07
WO 01/54509 PCT/USO1/02599
sides being subjected to fifty volts for sixty seconds. During the course of
the
electrical stimulatioh tests, the incidence and severity of carcasses with
broken
vertebra or vertebrae was noted. The broken vertebra or vertebrae most likely
resulted from hide removal, although the vertebrae or vertebra may have been
broken by other means. In reviewing the results of the electrical stimulation
tests,
the applicants determined that carcasses with broken vertebra or vertebrae
produced more tender meat, and hence further testing was done in a controlled
setting to determine the effect of vertebral separation on meat tenderness.
In the set of experiments conducted, forty-four cattle were
slaughtered (fifty were originally slaughtered, but six carcasses were removed
from the study for various reasons). Forty-four carcass sides of the cattle
were
used for a control sample. For each of twenty-two carcass sides, the vertebra
or
vertebrae were separated in two places, with one separation posterior to the
thirteenth rib and a second separation between the fifth and sixth ribs. For
each
of an additional twenty-two carcass sides, the vertebra or vertebrae were
separated in three places, with one separation posterior to the thirteenth
rib, a
second separation between the fifth and sixth ribs, and a third separation
between the ninth and tenth ribs. The separations were performed before rigor
mortis and before chilling, approximately forty-five minutes postmortem.
Performing separations at this time allowed for additional carcass swinging as
the
carcasses moved along a chain.
After chilling, the lip-on ribeye was removed from each of the
eighty-eight sides and the strip loin was removed from twenty-seven of the
sides
in the study. The lip-on ribeyes were aged for fourteen days at one degree
Celsius and then frozen at negative twenty degrees Celsius. Steaks were



CA 02393768 2002-06-07
WO 01!54509 PCT/USO1/02599
removed from the lip-on ribeyes at the location of the eleventh, ninth and
seventh
ribs, and the steaks were vacuum packed and stored at negative twenty degrees
Celsius. Steaks were thawed for twenty-four hours and were then cooked. In
this study, the steaks were broiled to a medium degree of doneness (seventy-
one
degrees Celsius). After the cooked steaks were chilled at four degrees Celsius
for twenty-four hours, four cores of half-inch diameter were removed parallel
to
the muscle fiber for Warner-Bratzler shear force determination (a test
commonly
employed for defining the tenderness of a cut of meat). The peak forces from
each of the four cores were averaged to represent the shear force of each
steak.
Significant increases in tenderness (reduction in shear force
readings) resulted for the carcasses for which the vertebra or vertebrae were
separated. On average, the ribeye steaks from sides in which the vertebra or
vertebrae were separated in two places resulted in an 11.5% reduction in shear
forces compared to control sides. On average, the ribeye steaks from sides in
which the vertebra or vertebrae were separated in three places resulted in an
11.2% reduction , in shear forces compared to control sides. In addition,
increased consistency of meat tenderness resulted. Although tests were not
performed on all areas of the vertebra or vertebrae, it is believed that
increased
tenderness results from separation in other areas of the vertebrae that were
not
tested. Further, a single vertebra or vertebrae separation (at point E in FIG.
1;
i.e., through the thirteenth thoracic vertebrae 14) will also result in
increased meat
tenderness.
Further testing was conducted on additional cattle sides by making
the following cuts shown in Table 1.
26



CA 02393768 2002-06-07
WO 01/54509 PCT/USO1/02599
Table 1
Experiment Procedure


0 Separate 13th thoracic vertebra; saw
feather bones


1 Separate 13th thoracic vertebra


2 Separate 13th thoracic vertebra; cut
between feather
bones


3 Separate 12th thoracic vertebra


4 Separate 12th thoracic vertebra; cut
between feather
bones


Separate 12th thoracic vertebra; separate
13th rib


6 Separate 12th thoracic vertebra; separate
13th rib; cut
between feather bones


In each case the chine extending from the referenced vertebrae was also cut or
snipped. The feather bones refer to the bones extending toward the dorsal
surface of the carcass. In experiments 5 and 6 the rib was separated because
it
5 attaches to the twelfth thoracic vertebrae and provides some amount of
structural
support. In each of these experiments, significant improvements in tenderness
were noted.
The advantage of cutting through the twelfth thoracic vertebra
(experiments 3-6) is that it avoids the potential for causing damage to the
loin, if a
"bone-in" loin is desired. As noted, however, the disadvantage is the need for
an
additional cut through the thirteenth rib to accomplish complete separation.
C. Apparatus for Separating Vertebra or Vertebrae
Embodiments of the method of the present invention may be carried
out using suitable apparatus or appropriate devices. FIGS. 6-9 illustrate one
27



CA 02393768 2002-06-07
WO 01/54509 PCT/USO1/02599
exemplary apparatus for separating a vertebra or the vertebrae of a carcass,
and
FIGS. 10-12 illustrate such an apparatus during its use or operation. In one
embodiment, the apparatus 110 for use in meat processing comprises a plate
112 for contacting a carcass, an operating member 114 operably coupled to the
plate 112 and a drive mechanism 116 operably coupled to the operating member
114 for driving the operating member 114 into a carcass to manipulate or
separate one or more vertebrae. Thus, in one embodiment, the apparatus 110
comprises a plate system 112, a piercing operating member 114, and a drive
system 116. During operation, as shown in FIGS. 10-12, the plate system 112
may contact, be attached to or supported against the carcass of an animal, and
then the piercing member 114 may be driven through a single vertebra or
between two vertebrae to move, split and/or achieve separation of the vertebra
or
vertebrae. The components of the apparatus or device 110 may be assembled
and operably coupled to each other using suitable devices known to those
skilled
in the art, including screws, rivets, bearings, and the like, and operating or
driven
components may be coupled using appropriate power or motive force providing
and transmitting elements and linkages. Power source and/or drive elements
may be electrical, pneumatic, hydraulic or manual.
In one embodiment, as shown in FIGS. 6-9, the plate system 112
includes a lower face plate 118 and an upper face place 120. In the depicted
embodiment, the lower face plate 118 and the upper face plate 120 intersect at
substantially a ninety degree angle, although this angle may vary in other
embodiments of the invention, and the plate system 112 may take the form of a
single, generally flat or curved plate adapted to receive or conform to a
particular
portion of a carcass. In some instances, it may take the form of a table-like
28



CA 02393768 2002-06-07
WO 01/54509 PCT/USO1/02599
working surface for receiving a carcass or a portion thereof. Also, although
the
plates 118 and 120 are depicted as fixed relative to each other, they may be
respectively movably coupled by suitable adjustable brackets, slides or the
like,
whereby they may be relatively positioned at a selected angle.
As may be seen in FIGS. 10-12, which illustrate a second
embodiment of the apparatus, during operation the plate system 112 may be
placed against a carcass (a side of beef in FIGS. 10-12) with the lower face
plate 118 along the portion of the carcass that was sawed when a whole carcass
was split into two sides and the upper face plate 120 along the rib portion of
the
carcass. Each face plate 118, 120 may vary in size and geometry. In the
embodiment depicted in FIGS. 6-9, each face plate 118, 120 is substantially
rectangular in shape, and the lower face plate 118 is approximately 4.35
inches
wide and ten inches long, while the upper face plate 120 is approximately 3.5
inches wide and ten inches long. Each face plate 118, 120 is about 0.25 inches
thick in this embodiment. The plate system 112 may be made from any rigid
material appropriate for food processing applications, including but not
limited to
metals and plastics. The plate system 112 may include a pin, a plurality of
pins
or posts, an elevated or relieved region or regions, or other positioning,
guiding
and attachment device or adaptations (not shown in FIGS.) that may be used to
securely position or attach the apparatus 10 to the carcass during operation.
A
pin, or pins, for instance, could extend beyond each face plate 118,120 and
securely position and/or fasten or hold the carcass to the plate system 112.
The piercing member 114 may come in a variety of geometries. In
one embodiment, the member 114 is wedge-like (thus, it may also be referred to
as a piercing wedge 114 or an operating member 114), and although the cross
29



CA 02393768 2002-06-07
WO 01/54509 PCT/USO1/02599
section of the wedge shaped piercing member 114 may be circular in one
embodiment, in other embodiments it may have differing cross sections, such as
a square shape. The piercing wedge 114 depicted in FIGS. 6-9 is a rotational
piercing wedge. In the embodiment in FIGS. 6-9, a first end 140 of the
piercing
wedge 114 reaches a sharp point, and a second end 142 of the piercing wedge
114 has a diameter of approximately 1.5 inches. The depicted piercing wedge
114 increases in diameter and curves with length along the piercing wedge 114
from the first end 140 to the second end 142.
In an embodiment of the present invention including a rotational
piercing wedge 11.4, a rotational actuator may be used as the drive system or
drive mechanism 116. In the embodiment depicted in FIGS. 6-9, two pneumatic
rotational actuators of any type commonly used by those of skill in the art
are
operably coupled to the piercing member 114 to move the member 114. The
piercing member 114 may rotate upon an axle or axis of rotation. In the
embodiment of FIGS. 6-9, a link system 150 of two arms, with one arm being
connected to the piercing wedge 114 and the second arm being attached to the
rotational actuator or axle of rotation, may be used to translate the motion
of the
rotational actuator to the piercing member 114.
For an embodiment using a generally wedge-shaped rotational
piercing member 114, each face plate 118, 120 may have a hole of sufficient
size
to allow the second end 142, or wide end, of the piercing member 114 to fit
through and past the plate 112 to a desired extent or travel. These holes or
apertures are designated by numerals 144 and 146 in FIGS. 6-9. The apertures
144, 146 need not be circular or any particular shape, but should be of
sufficient



CA 02393768 2002-06-07
WO 01/54509 PCT/USO1/02599
size and shape to allow the thick second end 142 of the piercing member 114 to
fit there through.
The apparatus may include one or more handles (not shown in
FIGS. 6-9, but indicated at numeral 160 in FIGS. 13-16 of a second embodiment)
for grasping, moving and handling the apparatus 110, and/or for positioning
and
supporting it relative to and/or against a carcass. An operator of the
apparatus
may therefore grasp the handles and support the apparatus against a carcass
or,
in another embodiment, the apparatus may be mounted or suspended on a
stand, lift or support generally similar to those used to support other tools
(saws,
etc.) that may be positioned adjacent a carcass in meat processing operations.
For actuation, the handles or any other portion of the apparatus may contain a
triggering device (not shown) that actuates the drive mechanism to move the
piercing member 14.
FIGS. 13-16 illustrate a second embodiment of the apparatus 110
of the present invention. In the embodiment of FIGS. 13-16, the apparatus
includes handles 160, and the actuator 116 of the apparatus is directly
attached
to the piercing member 114 to drive or move it, and therefore the apparatus
does
not contain links or arms between the piercing member 114 and the actuator
116.
The apparatus of FIGS. 13-16 also has an angle of slightly less than ninety
degrees between the upper face plate 120 and the lower face plate 118, which
may allow the apparatus to conform to certain carcasses and/or to separations
or
manipulations to be carried out on a carcass.
As can be seen in the three different views of FIGS. 10-12, which
show operation of the apparatus embodiment shown in FIGS. 13-16, upon
actuation by the drive system 116, the rotational wedge-like piercing member
114
31



CA 02393768 2002-06-07
WO 01/54509 PCT/USO1/02599
moves into the carcass 170, separating two vertebrae of the carcass 170 or, in
another application, separating a single vertebra. The piercing member 114 may
be sized such that it causes a complete separation of the vertebra or
vertebrae,
but does not extend into the major muscle (the longissimus dorsi muscle in
FIGS.
10-12), which could damage the major muscle. Instead, the piercing member
114 separates only the vertebra or vertebrae and the tissue, fat, and minor
muscles immediately adjacent the vertebrae and the area in which the piercing
member 114 is used. In an embodiment in which the second end 142 of the
piercing member 114 is approximately 1.5 inches in diameter, a separation of
1.5
inches results upon use of an apparatus of the invention using such a piercing
member 114. During operation, the piercing member 114 may enter the
carcass 170 at any point that results in a clean separation of the vertebra or
vertebrae. FIGS. 10-12 illustrate the piercing member 114 entering the
vertebra
or vertebrae on the surface exposed by the cutting to split the carcass into
two
sides during commercial meat production.
In another embodiment of the invention (not shown in the figures), a
linear piercing member 114 may be used in conjunction with a linear actuator
as
the drive system 116. In such an embodiment, the linear piercing member 114
may be a rod that is sharpened at one end or, alternatively, a linear rod that
tapers from a larger thickness or diameter to a decreased thickness or
diameter
or sharp point at the other end. One or more linear actuators may be used to
drive the linear piercing member 114 into the vertebra or between two
vertebrae.
Much like other embodiments of the piercing member 114, an embodiment using
a linear piercing member 114 may be sized and oriented such that use of the
piercing member 114 does not result in damage to the major muscle near the
32



CA 02393768 2002-06-07
WO 01/54509 PCT/USO1/02599
vertebrae, but instead results only in separation of the vertebra or vertebrae
and
possibly minor muscles, connective tissue, and fat immediately adjacent the
vertebra or vertebrae and area in which the piercing member 114 enters the
carcass. It should understood that any embodiment of the present invention may
be adapted for selecting the depth of penetration of the member 114; this may
be
accomplished by providing apertures 144, 146 of a particular, selected size as
exemplified in the figures. It also may be accomplished by providing suitable
stops or shoulders on the member 114 or on the drive mechanism 116 coupled
thereto as is known in the motive and/or mechanical arts. While powered or
driven embodiments of the apparatus 110 are depicted, it should be appreciated
that manual embodiments are possible, including manual embodiments with
suitable gearing or force multiplying features.
Use of an apparatus for manipulating, separating or piercing such
as that disclosed above may result in repeatably accurate vertebral
separations
that require a minimal amount of effort. Through the use of such an apparatus
110, a vertebra or vertebrae may be separated quickly at chain speeds that
match those commonly used during commercial meat production processes.
Such an apparatus 110 performs an act of piercing that may be quickly and
repeatably performed on carcass after carcass without damaging major muscles.
Unlike the use of a saw to sever the vertebrae of the carcass, the use of an
apparatus 110 such as that disclosed above can repeatably manipulate and/or
separate a single vertebra or two vertebrae without risking damage to major
muscles, because the piercing member 114 will repeatably reach the same depth
into the carcass without harming the major muscles. In one embodiment of the
present invention, an air-powered or hydraulic-powered circular saw, for
example
33



CA 02393768 2002-06-07
WO 01/54509 PCT/USO1/02599
one sold under the "Jarvis" brand name, is used to separate the vertebrae. In
one embodiment, a reciprocating saw (such as the Jarvis Model 444) is used to
separate the vertebrae.
While the present invention has been described with reference to
several embodiments thereof, those skilled in the art may recognize various
changes that may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the
claimed invention. Accordingly, this invention is not limited to what is shown
in
the drawings and described in the specification but only as indicated in the
appended claims. Any numbering or ordering of the elements in the following
claims is merely for convenience and is not intended to suggest that the
ordering
of the elements of the claims has any particular significance other than that
otherwise expressed by the language of the claims.
Although the present invention has been described with reference
to preferred embodiments, workers skilled in the art will recognize that
changes
may be made in form and detail without departing from the spirit and scope of
the
invention.
34

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date 2006-09-05
(86) PCT Filing Date 2001-01-26
(87) PCT Publication Date 2001-08-02
(85) National Entry 2002-06-07
Examination Requested 2003-01-28
(45) Issued 2006-09-05
Expired 2021-01-26

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 2002-06-07
Application Fee $300.00 2002-08-19
Section 8 Correction $200.00 2002-08-19
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 2 2003-01-27 $100.00 2003-01-13
Request for Examination $400.00 2003-01-28
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 3 2004-01-26 $100.00 2004-01-05
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 4 2005-01-26 $100.00 2005-01-06
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 5 2006-01-26 $200.00 2006-01-09
Final Fee $300.00 2006-06-16
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 6 2007-01-26 $200.00 2007-01-02
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 7 2008-01-28 $200.00 2008-01-02
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 8 2009-01-26 $400.00 2009-04-02
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 9 2010-01-26 $200.00 2009-12-16
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 10 2011-01-26 $250.00 2010-12-17
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 11 2012-01-26 $250.00 2012-01-05
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 12 2013-01-28 $250.00 2012-12-13
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 13 2014-01-27 $250.00 2013-12-11
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 14 2015-01-26 $250.00 2015-01-02
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 15 2016-01-26 $450.00 2016-01-06
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 16 2017-01-26 $450.00 2017-01-05
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 17 2018-01-26 $450.00 2018-01-03
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 18 2019-01-28 $450.00 2019-01-03
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 19 2020-01-27 $450.00 2019-12-24
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
EXCEL CORPORATION
Past Owners on Record
BELL, BRIAN W.
DOLEZAL, HOWARD G., JR.
GROSE, DARREN
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Representative Drawing 2002-06-07 1 34
Cover Page 2002-12-09 1 42
Cover Page 2002-12-10 2 79
Abstract 2002-06-07 2 71
Claims 2002-06-07 4 112
Drawings 2002-06-07 12 182
Description 2002-06-07 34 1,340
Description 2005-11-17 36 1,377
Claims 2005-11-17 3 92
Representative Drawing 2006-08-08 1 15
Cover Page 2006-08-08 1 43
Fees 2006-01-09 1 34
PCT 2002-06-07 3 102
Assignment 2002-06-07 4 155
Correspondence 2002-11-15 1 38
Assignment 2002-06-07 6 220
Correspondence 2002-12-05 1 24
Prosecution-Amendment 2002-12-10 2 48
Assignment 2002-11-15 5 190
Fees 2003-01-13 1 36
Prosecution-Amendment 2003-01-28 1 41
Correspondence 2003-04-14 1 11
Assignment 2002-12-05 7 316
PCT 2002-06-08 3 187
Prosecution-Amendment 2003-06-10 4 175
Prosecution-Amendment 2003-07-31 1 43
Fees 2004-01-05 1 35
Fees 2005-01-06 1 36
Prosecution-Amendment 2005-05-17 2 62
Prosecution-Amendment 2005-11-17 10 282
Correspondence 2006-06-16 1 43
PCT Correspondence 2002-08-19 67 2,638