Language selection

Search

Patent 2412481 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2412481
(54) English Title: METHOD FOR PRODUCING IN-EAR HEARING AIDS AND IN-EAR HEARING AID
(54) French Title: PROCEDE DE FABRICATION D'APPAREILS AUDITIFS ET APPAREIL AUDITIF Y RELATIF
Status: Expired
Bibliographic Data
Abstracts

English Abstract




The aim of the invention is to produce shells for in-ear hearing aids which
are to be adapted very precisely to the individual auditory canal shape. To
this end, a mould is made of the individual auditory canal and a hearing aid
shell is created using an additive construction technique such as laser
sintering, stereolithography or the thermojet technique, which is controlled
with the mould data.


French Abstract

L'invention concerne la fabrication de coques pour appareils de correction auditive intra-auriculaires, s'adaptant très exactement à la forme individuelle du conduit auditif, selon lequel on prépare un moulage du conduit auditif individuel et on réalise une coque de l'appareil auditif par un processus supplémentaire de préparation de structure, par exemple, par frittage au laser, stéréolithographie ou thermojet, processus qui est commandé par les données de forme.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.




-10-


WHAT IS CLAIMED IS:


1. A method for producing in-the-ear hearing devices, comprising steps of:
making a mold in the shape of an individual auditory canal,
producing a hearing device shell corresponding to the mold,
installing functional parts of the hearing device, and
digitizing the shape in 3D, the hearing device shell being thus created by
an additive construction method comprising a step of depositing one sectional
layer after the other, on top of one another, characterized in that firstly
sectional
layers of a plurality of individual hearing device shells are respectively
created
virtually in parallel, before the following sectional layers of the individual
hearing
device shells are deposited on already created layers in the additive
construction method.

2. The method as claimed in claim 1, comprising steps of taking an
impression of the individual auditory canal, then scanning the impression to
obtain a scanning signal, and digitizing the scanning signal.

3. The method as claimed in claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the step of
digitizing is performed at distributed front centers, the data corresponding
to the
mold being transmitted to a production center, where at least the hearing
device
shell is created.

4. The method as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 3, characterized in that
the additive construction method uses laser sintering, stereolithography or a
thermojet method.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.



CA 02412481 2008-09-10

-1-
METHOD FOR PRODUCING IN-EAR HEARING
AIDS AND IN-EAR HEARING AID

The present invention relates to a method for producing in-the-ear hearing
devices.

In the production of shells for in-the-ear hearing
devices, the customary practice followed at present by
the audiologist is to make a mold in the shape of the
individual auditory canal, by taking an impression,
usually of silicone.

This mold is subsequently sent to the producer of the
hearing devices, where the hearing device shell is
molded from a plastic on the basis of this mold.

This procedure is problematical from various aspects:

= In the production method based on the aforementioned
impression of the outer ear, polymer materials which
lead to relatively hard, dimensionally stable shells
have to be used. This virtually always leads to the
shell having to be re-worked on account of remaining
pressure points when the finished in-the-ear hearing
device is fitted into the individual ear. Since the
trial fitting usually does not take place at the
premises of the producer, a laborious procedure of
sending the device back and forth is often required
before the shell individually fits.

= The aforementioned procedure no doubt makes it
possible for the resultant shell to correspond in its
outer shape to the impression, but not for complex
internal shapes to be formed, as would be desirable
for functional parts of the hearing device to be
received in an optimized way in terms of fitting. In


CA 02412481 2008-09-10

-2-
this respect, we understand functional parts as
meaning all units which are responsible for picking
up, processing and reproducing the audio signals,
that is of microphones, digital processors,
loudspeakers and the associated auxiliary units, such
as for remote control of binaural signal
transmission, batteries etc. In this respect, it
must be pointed out that optimum packing of these
functional parts in a way which utilizes the space
available can only be carried out on an individual
basis, since the geometry of the. auditory canal may
vary greatly individually.

The procedure described is, on the one hand, highly
labor-intensive, and the resultant hearing device
usually remains less than optimum with respect to its
wearing comfort and space utilization. The materials
used in the case of said conventional production method
also require a relatively great wall thickness of the
shell of the in-the-ear hearing device, which reduces
the space available=for said functional parts move than
is the case anyway.

The present invention has the purpose of overcoming
these disadvantages mentioned.

According to the present invention, there is provided a method for
producing in-the-ear hearing devices, comprising steps of:
making a mold in the shape of an individual auditory canal,
producing a hearing device shell corresponding to the mold,
installing functional parts of the hearing device, and
digitizing the shape in 3D, the hearing device shell being thus
created by an additive construction method comprising a step of depositing
one sectional layer after the other, on top of one another, characterized in
that firstly sectional layers of a plurality of individual hearing device
shells
are respectively created virtually in parallel, before the following sectional


CA 02412481 2008-09-10

-3-
layers of the individual hearing device shells are deposited on already
created layers in the additive construction method.

Preferably, for this purpose, it is distinguished by the fact that
the shape of the individual outer ear is digitized
three-dimensionally (3D) and the device shell is
created by an additive construction method. Additive
construction methods are also known from "rapid
prototyping".

Preferably, with respect to additive methods being used in rapid prototyping
or those still under development, reference is made, for example, to Wohlers
Report 2000, Rapid Prototyping & Tooling State of the Industry.

Preferably, of the additive processes known at present for rapid
prototyping, it is found that laser sintering, laser
lithography or stereolithography, or the thermojet
method are particularly well suited for achieving the
aforementioned object.

These and further additive construction methods from
"rapid prototyping" are known per se. Therefore,
specifications of the preferably used additive
construction methods are only briefly summarized:

~ Laser sintering:

Hot-melt powder is applied in a thin layer from a
powder bed, for example by means of a roller. The
powder layer is solidified by means of a laser beam,
said laser beam being guided according to a sectional
layer of the hearing device shell by means of 3D
shape information of the hearing device shell. A
solidified sectional layer of the shell is obtained


CA 02412481 2008-09-10

-4-
in the otherwise loose powder. This layer is lowered
from the powder laying plane and a new layer of
powder is applied over it, and this layer of powder
is in turn solidified by laser according to a
sectional layer, etc.

= Laser lithography or stereolithography:

A first sectional contour according to a sectional
layer of a hearing' device shell is solidified by
means of UV laser on the surface of liquid
photopolymer. The solidified layer is lowered, is
again covered by liquid polymer and the second
sectional layer is solidified by means of UV laser.

= Thermojet method:

The contour formation in accordance with a sectional
layer is carried out in the same way as in an inkjet
printer by liquid application according to the
digitized 3D shape information. After that, the
deposited sectional "picture" is solidified.

Once again, according to the principle of the additive
construction methods, the device shell is built up by
depositing layer after layer.

As regards additive construction methods, and the
preferred ones mentioned above, reference may be made
to the following further publications:

= "Selective Laser Sintering (SLS) of Ceramics",
Muskesh Agarwala et al., presented at the Solid
Freeform Fabrication Symposium, Austin, TX, August
1999, and


CA 02412481 2008-09-10

-5-
= Donald Klosterman et al., Direct Fabrication of
Polymer Composite Structures with Curved LOM", Solid
Freeform Fabrication Symposium, University of Texas
at Austin, August 1999.

In. principle, in additive construction methods a thin
layer of material is in each case deposited on a
surface, either over the whole surface as in laser
sintering or stereolithography or, as in the thermojet
method, already in the contour of a section of the
shell under construction. The desired sectional shape
is then stabilized and solidified.

Once a layer has been solidified, a new layer is
deposited over this, as has been described, and this
new layer is in turn solidified and connected to the
already solidified layer lying below it. The hearing
device shell is thus constructed layer by layer by
additive layer-by-layer application.

For industrial production, it is preferable not just
for the sectional layer of one hearing device shell to
be deposited and solidified in each case, but for a
plurality to be deposited and solidified
simultaneously. In laser sintering, the laser,
normally under mirror control, successively solidifies
the sectional layers of a plurality of hearing device


CA 02412481 2002-12-05

WO 02/03756 PCT/CHOO/00356
- 6 -

shells, before all the solidified sectional layers are
lowered in unison. Then, after a new layer of powder
has been deposited over all the already solidified and
lowered sectional layers, the plurality of further
sectional layers are formed in turn.

In order to solidify the sectional layers of the
hearing device shells, either a single laser beam
continues to be used, or several beams are operated in
parallel.

In an alternative to this procedure, a sectional layer
is in each case solidified with one laser, while at the
same time the layer of powder is being deposited for
the formation of a further hearing device shell.
Thereafter, the prepared layer of powder is solidified
according to the sectional layer for the next hearing
device shell by the same laser, while the previously
solidified layer is lowered and a new layer of powder
is deposited there. The laser then operates
intermittently between two or more hearing device
shells under construction, and so the idle time of the
laser occasioned by the deposition of powder for the
formation of one of the shells is exploited for
solidification of a sectional layer of another shell
under construction.

In an analogous way, the productivity when using
stereolithography is increased. When the thermojet
method is used and an analogous increase in
productivity is to be obtained, sectional layers of
more than one hearing device shell are deposited at the
same time.

It is thus possible by the method according to the
invention to create extremely complex shapes on the


CA 02412481 2002-12-05

WO 02/03756 PCT/CHOO/00356
7
shell produced according to the invention, to be
precise both with respect to its outer shaping and with
respect to its inner shaping. Overhangs, inward
projections and outward projections can be readily
created.

Furthermore, there are known materials for additive
construction methods which lead to an elastomeric and
nevertheless dimensionally stable shell, which if
desired can be created differently locally, to the
extent of producing an extremely thin wall which is
nevertheless tear-resistant.

In an embodiment preferred at present, the mold in the
shape of the individual auditory canal is made in the
course of the production method according to the
invention by taking an impression, for example of
silicone, while not ruling out the possibility that in
the near future the shape of the individual auditory
canal will be scanned directly.

In a preferred embodiment of the production method
according to the invention, furthermore, said
digitization of the auditory canal is performed,
whether by taking an impression or by directly scanning
decentralized front centers, such as for example by the
audiologist. The shape recorded there, as represented
by digital 3D information, is transmitted to a
production center, whether by sending a data carrier or
by an Internet link etc. At the production center, the
hearing device shell is individually shaped, in
particular using the aforementioned methods. Final
assembly of the hearing device with the functional
modules is preferably also performed there.


CA 02412481 2002-12-05

WO 02/03756 PCT/CH00/00356
- S -

On account of the fact that, as mentioned, the
thermoplastic materials used generally lead to a
relatively elastic, compliant shell, the shaping is far
less critical in terms of pressure points than has
previously been the case. In a way similar to an
elastomeric plug, the shell of the finished in-the-ear
hearing device will adapt itself optimally to the outer
ear. The inclusion of one or more venting channels in
the hearing device shell is readily possible and
desired in this case, in order with the resultant
relatively tight fit of the hearing device in the
auditory canal to permit unimpaired ventilation of the
ear drum. At the same time, with the individual 3D
shape data, the interior space of the shell can also be
optimally and individually shaped for optimum reception
of the functional parts respectively to be provided in
an individual case.

Furthermore, the central production of the shells also
allows central storage and administration of the
individual hearing - device data to be performed,
including the data which define the shape of the
hearing device shells. If, for whatever reasons, a
shell has to be replaced, it can consequently be
readily reproduced by calling up the corresponding
individual data records and renewed production.

On account of the fact that the methods used according
to the invention for the production of hearing device
shells are extremely widespread, albeit from
prototyping, and described in the literature, there is
no need at this point to reproduce all the technical
details relating to these methods.

In any event, the adoption of this technology that is
already known from prototyping for the industrial and


CA 02412481 2002-12-05

WO 02/03756 PCT/CHOO/00356
- 9 -

commercially acceptable production of in-the-ear
hearing device shells surprisingly gives rise to quite
significant advantages, and does so for reasons which
are not in fact important in prototyping, such as for
example elasticity of the thermoplastic materials that
can be used, the possibility of individual construction
with extremely thin walls etc.

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 2412481 was not found.

Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date 2010-04-13
(86) PCT Filing Date 2000-06-30
(87) PCT Publication Date 2002-01-10
(85) National Entry 2002-12-05
Examination Requested 2005-05-05
(45) Issued 2010-04-13
Expired 2020-06-30

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Application Fee $300.00 2002-12-05
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 2 2002-07-02 $100.00 2002-12-05
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 3 2003-06-30 $100.00 2003-04-14
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 2003-05-26
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 4 2004-06-30 $100.00 2004-04-05
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 5 2005-06-30 $200.00 2005-04-21
Request for Examination $800.00 2005-05-05
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 6 2006-06-30 $200.00 2006-06-06
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 7 2007-07-02 $200.00 2007-06-06
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 8 2008-06-30 $200.00 2008-06-02
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 9 2009-06-30 $200.00 2009-05-11
Final Fee $300.00 2010-01-27
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 10 2010-06-30 $250.00 2010-06-21
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 11 2011-06-30 $250.00 2011-05-11
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 12 2012-07-02 $250.00 2012-05-10
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 13 2013-07-02 $250.00 2013-05-30
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 14 2014-06-30 $250.00 2014-06-23
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 15 2015-06-30 $450.00 2015-06-29
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 16 2016-06-30 $450.00 2016-06-27
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 17 2017-06-30 $450.00 2017-06-26
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 18 2018-07-03 $450.00 2018-06-25
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 19 2019-07-02 $450.00 2019-06-21
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
PHONAK AG
Past Owners on Record
DUTTA, JOYDEEP
WIDMER, CHRISTOPH
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Abstract 2002-12-05 1 57
Claims 2002-12-05 2 52
Description 2002-12-05 9 344
Cover Page 2010-03-17 1 27
Description 2008-09-10 9 336
Claims 2008-09-10 1 33
Cover Page 2009-12-12 1 27
PCT 2002-12-05 10 405
Assignment 2002-12-05 5 138
Correspondence 2003-02-21 1 24
PCT 2002-12-06 5 185
Fees 2004-04-05 1 32
Fees 2003-04-14 1 27
Assignment 2003-05-26 2 64
Prosecution-Amendment 2008-03-11 3 94
Fees 2005-04-21 1 27
Prosecution-Amendment 2005-05-05 1 26
Fees 2006-06-06 1 36
Fees 2007-06-06 1 46
Fees 2008-06-02 1 42
Prosecution-Amendment 2008-09-10 10 323
Fees 2009-05-11 1 55
Correspondence 2010-01-27 2 53
Correspondence 2010-08-10 1 44