Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
CA 02425068 2003-03-17
WO 02/28179 PCT/US00/27018
ALLERGEN NEUTRALIZATION COMPOSITIONS
TECHNICAL FIELD
The present invention relates to aqueous allergen neutralizing compositions
that
control allergen containing dust particles while not leaving behind a sticky
film on
household surfaces. These compositions do not stain fabric materials and are
effective for
suppressing allergen compounds. The present compositions are particularly
effective
against the allergens associated with house dust mites and other common
allergens such
as cat dander, pollen and the like.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Sensitivity to allergens is a problem for an increasing number of consumers.
This
issue has been complicated by a surprising increase in asthma over the past
few years.
Asthma sufferers are especially sensitive to airborne allergens. Allergy rates
are also on
the rise. This gives rise to increased awareness of the causes of allergy
symptoms and
how to decrease the associated discomfort.
Allergic reactions can be initiated in many ways, but one of the most common
ways is by the inhalation of airborne allergens. Another common way to ingest
allergens
is when they come in direct contact with a moist surface on the body where
they stick and
react with the surrounding body tissue. This can happen, for example, when a
person lays
down in bed and allergen containing dust that lay on the pillow or bed
coverings contacts
and is absorbed into the person's eyes. This typically results in an allergic
reaction as the
allergens are gradually absorbed into the mucous around the eye.
Many allergens are protein based molecules, and these protein allergens can
originate from many sources. It has been known for some time that one of the
most
common sources of allergens in a house is from dust mites. Of course, as is
the case with
all allergens, only certain people are allergic to dust mite allergens. But
this group of
people can be quite large in many areas, especially in hot humid areas. For
example, in
the south eastern United States of America, where it is both hot and humid for
much of
the year, the incidence of house dust mite allergies in the general population
can be as
high as 25%. .
1
CA 02425068 2003-03-17
WO 02/28179 PCT/US00/27018
House dust mites thrive in plush carpets, overstuffed upholstery, cushy bed
comforters and the like. Medical professionals who specialize in the treatment
of
allergies often recommend the removal of these items from the homes of people
who
suffer from dust mite allergies. For many reasons, this is often an
impractical and
unworkable solution to the problem of dust mite allergies.
Another common method for removing mite allergens from a house is the use of
miticides to kill the mites. But, unfortunately, the proteins that cause
allergic reactions
can be found in the mite corpses and also the residual mite feces. Thus,
killing the mites
does not solve the problem. And because some miticides can be relatively harsh
chemicals, some consumers are reluctant to use these chemicals throughout
their home on
a regular basis.
Other methods for neutralizing allergens in the home include spraying
household
surfaces with compositions that either denature the allergens or simply cover
them. The
denaturing sprays, in theory, render the protein molecules inactive with
respect to causing
an allergic reaction. This is accomplished by chemical complexing between the
allergen
protein and the denaturing chemical such that the allergen can no longer
initiate an
allergic reaction in a human. Moreover, sprays can be used to "cover" or
entrap the
allergen containing particles. hl theory, the "covered" allergen particles
become too
heavy to float in the air and cannot be inhaled. Likewise they do not directly
contact the
human body and cannot cause an allergic reaction. For various reasons, neither
of these
two approaches have proven entirely satisfactory for allergen sufferers.
Specifically, currently available allergen neutralization sprays typically use
a
tannin, or other related polyphenols, as the active component. But tannins and
related
chemicals are notorious for their strong tendency in forming color. Thus,
these chemicals
cannot be sprayed onto fabrics without a substantial risk of staining the
fabric material.
As discussed above, fabrics such as bed covers, furniture covers, floor
coverings,
draperies, etc. are typically the areas where allergens can be found. Thus,
few consumers
feel comfortable spraying allergen neutralization compounds on their household
fabrics.
Likewise, the materials used to "cover" or encase allergen containing
materials,
such as dust, tend to be generally undesirable. Specifically, these materials
typically
"stick" to dust and other airborne particles making them too heavy to remain
aloft.
Unfortunately, both the spray and the covered particles become "sticky"
resulting in fabric
surfaces that feel sticky. This is especially undesirable for bed covers and
pillows because
they come into direct contact with the consumer's skin. Moreover, it is well
known that
spraying a fabric with a sticky material results in attracting more dust and
other airborne
2
CA 02425068 2003-03-17
WO 02/28179 PCT/US00/27018
particles to the surface of the material. Ultimately, the surface becomes
dirty much
quicker than would normally occur.
For these reasons there exists a need for products that can neutralize
allergens or at
least keep them out of the air. These products should be sprayable and
compatible with a
wide variety of fabric materials. That is, the spray products should not stain
or otherwise
damage common household fabrics that are used in malting draperies, bed
covers,
carpeting, rugs, clothing, furniture covers and others. Moreover, these
materials should
create no additional health or environmental problems. For example, the spray
products
should not have a noxious smell nor should they be toxic to humans and
household pets.
Importantly, and in addition to the needs discussed above, there exists a need
for
allergen neutralization products that leave the surfaces on which they are
sprayed with a
smooth, non-sticky feel. That is, the spray should be effective against
allergens without
causing the displeasing side effect of leaving household surfaces with a
sticky feeling.
These and other needs are met by the allergen neutralization spray products of
the present
invention.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In one aspect, the present invention comprises an allergen neutralization
composition that retains at least about 30%, preferably at least about 35%,
and more
preferably at least about 40% of dust particles as measured by the Dust
Control Test, and
the composition has an average MIU value of less than about 3.4, preferably
less than
about 3.2, more preferably less than about 3.0 as measured by the Friction
Coefficient
Analysis method. In a preferred aspect of this invention the composition
yields a AE
value of less than about 3.5, preferably, less than about 3.0, and more
preferably less than
about 1.0 as measured by Fabric Color Evaluation method. The compositions
herein are
preferably used on inanimate objects and are sprayable. Preferably, the
allergen
neutralization compositions comprise allergen denaturing compounds selected
from the
group consisting of an effective amount °of an allergy neutralizing
metal ion, polyphenol
compounds, hydrogen peroxide, salicylic acid, citric acid, lactic acid,
glycolic acid,
ascorbic acid, gallic acid, gluconic acids, and mixtures thereof, a solvent,
and preferably a
wetting agent.
The optional metal ions are preferably selected from the group consisting of
ions
of zinc, stannous, stannic, magnesium, calcium, manganese, titanium, iron,
copper, nickel,
and mixtures thereof. In one aspect of this invention the metal ion is present
in the
composition at about 0.01% to about 20%, preferably from about 0.1% to about
10%,
3
CA 02425068 2003-03-17
WO 02/28179 PCT/US00/27018
more preferably from about 0.2% to about 8%, by weight, of the allergen
neutralization
composition.
The solvent for the allergen neutralization compositions of the present
invention
preferably comprises water, and more preferably the solvent comprises from
about 0.01%
to about 20%, by weight of the allergen neutralization composition, of a
volatile lower
alcohol. Even more preferably, the allergen neutralization compositions are
essentially
free of complexing agents. By "essentially free of it is meant the allergen
neutralization
composition contains less than about 0.5%, preferably less than about 0.1%,
and even
more preferably less than 0.01%, by weight, of complexing agents.
The allergen neutralization compositions of the present invention provide
superior
performance in reducing a consumer's allergy symptoms. These compositions
operate on
the principle of neutralizing allergenic proteins by controlling the dust
particles that
contain the allergenic proteins. Such allergenic proteins include, for
example, proteins
associated with common house dust mites, cat dander and others. The proteins
can be
neutralized chemically by denaturing, as well as being physically disabled by
dust control
methods. In either event, the proteins that cause allergic reactions in humans
are
neutralized or kept from entering the human body, as opposed to simply killing
the mites.
The compositions of the present invention, in addition to providing improved
efficacy, are compatible with a wide variety of household surfaces where house
dust
mites, and their feces and corpses might reside. Moreover, the compositions of
the
present invention leave surfaces feeling smooth and non-sticky. This provides
a
substantial benefit because many known allergen neutralization compositions
are known
to leave a sticky film on fabrics and hard surfaces. As can be appreciated, a
product that is
effective against allergen containing compounds will not be received favorably
by
consumers if it leaves a sticky film on the surfaces that it is used. Thus,
the present
compositions provide many unexpected and superior benefits over known allergen
neutralizing compositions.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
As used herein, the phrase "allergen neutralization" is intended to include
both
chemical denaturing and physical covering of the allergen containing protein.
The
compositions of this invention may neutralize allergens by chemically
denaturing them,
physically covering them, or both. More specifically, by chemical denaturing,
it is meant
that the chemical structure of an allergen containing protein is altered such
that it no
longer gives rise to allergic reactions in humans. While not wanting to be
bound by any
4
CA 02425068 2003-03-17
WO 02/28179 PCT/US00/27018
one theory, it is believed that the metal ions of the present compositions,
and the optional
allergen denaturing compounds, bind with the protein molecule in a way that
prevents
further reaction with a human. Tlus is only one example of many potential
chemical
denaturing mechanisms. Ultimately, the allergic reaction is not initiated.
Likewise, physical "covering" of the allergen protein, or the particles such
as dust,
that contain these proteins, inhibit the initiation of the allergic reaction.
While again, not
wanting to be bound by any one theory, it is believed that an allergen protein
must be
solubilized or dispersed by the human body to initiate an allergic reaction.
This can occur
when the protein contacts body fluids such as sweat on the skin, mucous in the
eyes and
nasal cavities, or saliva in the mouth. It is believed that if the protein is
covered in a
composition that does not readily solubilize or disperse in bodily fluids, the
protein will
not be available to initiate the allergic reaction. Moreover, physically
covering a protein
or the particles that contain the protein, for example, a house dust mite, the
corpse of a
house dust mite, or a common dust particle, the particles may be too heavy to
become
airborne. Because many allergens are inhaled, the simple act of "grounding"
the allergen
containing particles can significantly decrease the symptoms experienced by an
allergy
sufferer.
I. ALLERGEN NEUTRALIZATION COMPOSITIONS
DUST CONTROL
One method of relieving allergy symptoms is to control "dust" particles that
may
contain allergenic protein molecules. "Dust" as used herein refers to any
particulate
matter that might be found in an enclosed space that might be occupied by one
or more
humans. The particulate matter can be as small as one or more allergenic
protein
molecules or it can comprise larger particles, for example, dust mites, their
fecal matter
and their corpses. Houses and the rooms within a house, cars, hotel rooms,
train cars,
airline cabins, are among the many places that allergen containing dust might
be found.
By immobilizing a portion of the dust, the allergenic proteins are miavailable
to cause
allergic reactions in humans. By this method, dust control can reduce allergic
reactions in
humans.
To control dust, the allergen neutralization compositions of this invention
are
sprayed onto common household surfaces where allergen containing dust might be
found.
A portion of the dust is then immobilized, but a portion of the allergenic
proteins may be
neutralized as well. The dust particles are generally immobilized by filin
forming
polymers that do not leave a sticky film on fabrics. The ability for a
composition to
5
CA 02425068 2003-03-17
WO 02/28179 PCT/US00/27018
control dust can be measured and quantified by the "Dust Control Test" given
in Example
I. Stickyness can be measured and quantified by the "Friction Coefficient
Analysis"
given below in Example II.
Film forming polymers suitable for use in the present invention include, water-
s soluble polymers selected from the group consisting of starch, polyvinyl
alcohols, Methyl
Cellulose ("MC"), and its derivatives, polyacrylic acids, polyethylene glycols
with
molecular weight higher than 5000, polyethylene, polypropylene glycol with
molecular
weight higher than 8000, Cosmetic Toiletry Fragrances Association ("CTFA")
polyquaternium compounds 1 through 14, polyvinyl pyrrolidone ("PVP"), and
mixtures
thereof. Specific examples of certain preferred film forming polymers are
selected from
the group consisting of hydroxy-propyl starch, Daisel MC 1310, Kuraray poly
vinyl
alcohol ("PVA") 205, N-Polyvinyl-2- pyrrolidone, and mixtures thereof.
The film forming polymers are present in the composition at about 0.01% to
about
20%, preferably from about 0.05% to about 15%, more preferably from about 0.1%
to
about 12%, by weight, of the allergen neutralization composition.
ALLERGEN NEUTRALIZING lIIETAL IONS
An optional component of the present invention is an allergen neuralizing
metal
ion, that is preferably supplied as a metallic salt. As discussed above, it is
believed that
these metal ions provide an allergen protein denaturing benefit. The metallic
salts are
selected from the group consisting of Zinc, Stannous, Stannic, Magnesium,
Calcium,
Manganese, Titanium, Iron, Manganese, Copper, Nickel, and mixtures thereof.
Stannic,
also known as tin4+, is less preferred than stannous due primarily to
solubility problems
with stannic at low pH. But those skilled in the art will be able to formulate
suitable
compositions with either substance.
The preferred metal ions are zinc and stannous as these generally show high
efficacy, with few detrimental environmental issues. Highly-ionized and
soluble metal
salts such as zinc chloride, provide the best source of metal ions. While
certain cations
yield superior solubility, all canons are acceptable for the metal salts of
the present
invention. For example, all halides, sulfates, etc. Preferably the metallic
salts are water-
soluble zinc salts, stannous salts or mixtures thereof, and especially ZnCl2
and SnCl2.
When metallic salts are added to the composition of the present invention they
are
typically present at a level of from about 0.01% to about 20%, preferably from
about 0.1%
to about 10%, more preferably from about 0.2% to about ~% by weight of the
usage
composition. When zinc salts are used as the metallic salt, and a clear
solution is desired,
6
CA 02425068 2003-03-17
WO 02/28179 PCT/US00/27018
it is preferable that the pH of the solution is adjusted to less than about 7,
more preferably
less than about 6, most preferably, less than about 5, in order to keep the
solution clear.
ALLERGENDENATURING COMPOUNDS
While the metal ions discussed above perform an allergen denaturing function,
additional allergen denaturing compounds may optionally be incorporated in the
present
compositions. These allergen denaturing compounds are preferably selected from
the
group consisting of polyphenol compounds, hydrogen peroxide, salicylic acid,
citric acid,
lactic acid, glycolic acid, ascorbic acid, gallic acid, gluconic acids, and
mixtures thereof.
Other alkyl acids are appropriate for use herein. When allergen denaturing
compounds
are incorporated into the compositions of this invention, it is preferred that
low molecular
weight alcohols, for example, ethanol, methanol, propanol or isopropanol, are
used in the
solvent. The solvent is discussed in greater detail below, but the use of low
molecular
weight alcohols in this context is to ensure solubility and stability of the
allergen
denaturing compounds in the composition. Low molecular weight alcohols are
especially
preferred when the concentration of the allergen denaturing compound exceeds
10% by
weight of the allergen neutralization composition.
The polyphenol compounds include tannins, catechins, gallic acid and the like.
These include either a natural or a synthetic substance such as, but not
limited to, tannic
acid or a synthetic tanning agent. Synthetic tanninsltannic acids generally
fall into three
chemical groups: 1) the so called auxiliary tans which are generally strong
simple organic
acids; 2) combination tans which are general sulphonic acids of complex
phenolic
materials; and, 3) exchange or replacement tans which are weakly acidic
polymeric
derivatives containing a large number of phenolic groups. Suitable tanning
agents may be
selected from cresol sulphonic acid arnmounium salt (Neosyn RW), melamine
formaldehyde sulphonate (Parnel A), a poly phenolic formaldehyde sulphonate
(Suparex
L) or a multiphenol formaldehyde sulphonate (Basyntan WL) as sold commercially
for
leather tanning or treatment. Other similar synthetic materials capable of
reaction with
protein (tanning action) may also prove effective when appropriately
formulated. More
recently formaldehyde reaction products of condensates and polymers of urea
and
melamine and mixtures thereof have been introduced for the manufacture of
specialized
leathers. These are also acceptable allergen denaturing compounds for the
purpose of the
present invention.
Naturally derived tamiic acids and polyphenolics are also desirable for the
present
invention. The ones that do not develop color rapidly with air are most
preferred. A most
7
CA 02425068 2003-03-17
WO 02/28179 PCT/US00/27018
preferred tannin source is the kaki extract supplied as Pancil by Ririsu
Scientific Industry
of Osaka, Japan. This tannin is described in Japan Patent Application No 1991-
3-61457;
the entire disclosure of this Japan Patent Application is incorporated herein
by reference.
When present, the allergen denaturing compositions are typically present at a
level
of from about 0.01% to about 20%, preferably from about 0.1% to about 10%,
more
preferably from about 0.2% to about 8% by weight of the usage composition.
SOLVENT
The solvent for the allergen neutralization compositions of the present
invention
preferably comprises water, and more preferably the solvent comprises a
volatile lower
alcohol. The water that is used can be distilled, deionized, or tap water.
Water not only
serves as the liquid Garner for the metal ions and other ingredients, it also
facilitates the
complexation reaction between the metal ion, the optional allergen denaturing
compositions and the allergenic protein. Not to be bound by theory, it is
believed that
water solubilizes the allergenic protein allowing it to react with the metal
ions, allergen
denaturing compounds or both.
Low molecular weight alcohols with relatively low boiling points, as compared
to
water, such as methanol, ethanol, propanol and butanol, are preferred optional
ingredients
for improving the drying speed of the present compositions. Specifically, when
the
aqueous based compositions of this invention are sprayed on a solid surface,
the surface
necessarily becomes wet. Consumers, in general, do not like having wet counter
tops,
furniture, bedding and other common surfaces. Thus, for consumer acceptance,
it is
preferred that the compositions herein dry quickly after being applied to a
surface. The
addition of a low molecular weight alcohol substantially improves the drying
time of the
present compositions.
Typically, alcohol is added to the composition of the present invention at a
level of
from about 0.01% to about 20%, by weight of the composition, preferably from
about
0.05% to about 10%, more preferably from about 0.1% to about 5.0%, by weight
of the
composition. It is understood that specialty products, for example,
concentrated or refill
solutions, solutions for industrial use, and the like, may contain higher
levels of alcohol.
In these products the alcohol can be present at levels of from greater than
20% to about
70%.
The solvent is preferably present in the allergen neutralization composition
at a
concentration of from 1% to 98%, preferably from about 3% to about 95%, and
more
preferably from about 5% to about 90%, by weight of the composition.
8
CA 02425068 2003-03-17
WO 02/28179 PCT/US00/27018
WETTING AGENT
It is preferred that the compositions of the present invention include a
wetting
agent such as a surfactant or the like. Most preferably, the wetting agent is
fully
compatible with the metal ions and the optional allergen denaturing compounds
and other
optional ingredients. The compatible wetting agent reduces surface tension of
the
composition of the present invention such that when the composition is sprayed
on a
surface the composition spreads evenly over the surface, and wets the surface
better. This
allows the maximum amount of the active ingredients to contact the surface
where the
allergens may be present.
Preferred wetting agents for use in the present allergen neutralization
compositions have an HLB of greater than about 8, and do not foam excessively.
Excessive foaming can be determined by placing 300 ppm of the wetting agent in
100m1
of distilled water in a 1000 ml stoppered graduated cylinder. The cylinder is
shaken by
inverting it 50 times. The cylinder should then be left to settle for 5
minutes. The
resulting foam height after the settling period should be less than 50 ml. Non-
limiting
examples of wetting agents suitable for use herein include fatty alcohol
ethloxylates, fatty
alcohol ethoxylate-propoxylate, sulfates of alcohols or ethxoylated fatty
alcohols, sorbitan
monoesters, amine oxides, ethoxylated fatty acid esters, alkyl ether
phosphates, alkyl
polyglycosides, fatty acid glucosamides, alkyl phenol ethoxylates, alkyl
phenol
ethoxylated sulfates, paraffin sulfonates, fatty alcohols sulfates, alkyl
phenyl sulfonates,
linear alkyl benzene sulfonates, alkyl dimethyl betaines, alkyl dimethyl
hydroxy propyl
sultaines, alkyoxylated polydimethyl siloxanes, alkyl dimethyl amine oxides
having alkyl
chains with 6-18 carbons, and mixtures thereof. In addition to the foregoing
list, many
other surfactant compounds selected from the group of anionic, nonionic,
cationic,
zwitterionic and mixtures thereof are suitable wetting agents for use herein.
One preferred
cationic surfactant suitable for use as a wetting agent in the present
invention is Coco K3,
which is a mono dodecanoate or tetradecanoate ester of methyl triethanol
ammonium
chloride.
Typical levels of wetting agents for use in the present compositions are from
about
0.01% to about 3%, preferably from about 0.03% to about 2%, more preferably
from
about 0.05% to about 1.0%, by weight of the composition.
Nonlimiting examples of compatible nonionic surfactants include block
copolymers
of ethylene oxide and propylene oxide. Suitable block polyoxyethylene
polyoxypropylene polymeric surfactants, include those based on ethylene
glycol,
9
CA 02425068 2003-03-17
WO 02/28179 PCT/US00/27018
propylene glycol, glycerol, trimethylolpropane and ethylenediamine as the
initial reactive
hydrogen compound. Polymeric compounds made from a sequential ethoxylation and
propoxylation of initial compounds with a single reactive hydrogen atom, such
as C12-18
aliphatic alcohols, are not generally compatible with the cyclodextrin.
Certain of the
block polylner surfactant compounds designated Pluronic~ and Tetronic~ by the
BASF-
Wyandotte Corp., Wyandotte, Michigan, are readily available. Examples of
Pluronic~
and Tetronic~ surfactants are given below.
Nonlimiting examples of Pluronic Surfactants with the general formula
H(EO)n(PO)m(EO)nH, wherein EO is an ethylene oxide group, PO is a propylene
oxide
group, and n and m are numbers that indicate the average number of the groups
in the
surfactants. Typical examples of cyclodextrin-compatible Pluronic surfactants
are:
Name Average MW Average n Average m
L-101 3,800 4 59
L-81 2,750 3 42
L-44 2,200 10 23
L-43 1,850 6 22
F-38 4,700 43 16
P-84 4,200 19 43,
and mixtures thereof.
Tetronic Surfactants have the general formula:
H(EO)n(PO) ~ s(p0)m(EO)nH
NCH2CH2N
H(EO)n(PO)rri ~((PO)m(EO)nH
wherein EO, PO, n, and m have the same meanings as above. Typical examples of
Tetronic surfactants are:
Name Average MW Average n Average m
901 4,700 3 18
908 25,000 114 22,
and mixtures thereof.
"Reverse" Pluronic and Tetronic surfactants have the following general
formulas:
Reverse Pluronic Surfactants H(PO)ln(EO)n(PO)mH
Reverse Tetronic Surfactants
H(PO)n(EO)m~ ~(EO)m(PO)nH
NCH2CHZN
H(PO)n(EO)ni ~ (EO)m(PO)nH
CA 02425068 2003-03-17
WO 02/28179 PCT/US00/27018
wherein EO, PO, n, and m have the same meanings as above. Typical examples of
cyclodextrin-compatible Reverse Pluronic and Reverse Tetronic surfactants are:
Reverse Pluronic surfactants:
Name Average MW Average n Average m
10 RS 1,950 8 22
25 Rl 2,700 21 6
Reverse Tetronic surfactants
Name Average MW Average n Average m
130 R2 7,740 9 26
70 R2 3,870 ' 4 13
and mixtures thereof.
Another class of suitable nonionic wetting agents includes polyalkyleneoxide
polysiloxanes having a dimethyl polysiloxane hydrophobic moiety and one or
more
hydrophilic polyallcylene side chains. Examples of this type of surfactants
are the Silwet~
surfactants which are available OSi Specialties, Inc., Danbury, Connecticut,
and have the
general formula:
CH3 CH3
(CH3)3Si0-(Si0)a-(Si0)b-Si(CH3)3
CH3 Rl
wherein a + b are from about 1 to about 50, preferably from about 3 to about
30, more
preferably from about 10 to about 25, and Rl is mainly one or more random
poly(ethyleneoxide/propyleneoxide) copolymer groups having the general
formula:
-(CH2)n O(C2 H4 O)c (C3 H6 O)d R2
wherein n is 3 or 4, preferably 3; total c (for all polyalkyleneoxy side
groups) has a value of
from 1 to about 100, preferably from about 6 to about 100; total d is from 0
to about 14,
preferably from 0 to about 3; and more preferably d is 0; total c+d has a
value of from
about 5 to about 150, preferably from about 9 to about 100 and each R2 is the
same or
different arid is selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, an alkyl
having 1 to 4
carbon atoms, and an acetyl group, preferably hydrogen and methyl group.
Representative Silwet surfactants are as follows.
Name . Average MW Average a+b Average total c
L-7608 600 1 9
L-7607 1,000 2 17
L-77 600 1 9
11
CA 02425068 2003-03-17
WO 02/28179 PCT/US00/27018
L-7605 6,000 20 99
L-7604 4,000 21 53
L-7600 4,000 11 68
L-7657 5,000 20 76
L-7602 3,000 20 29
The molecular weight of the polyalkyleneoxy group (R1) is less than or equal
to
about 10,000. Preferably, the molecular weight of the polyalkyleneoxy group is
less than or
equal to about 8,000, and most preferably ranges from about 300 to about
5,000. Thus, the
values of c and d can be those numbers which provide molecular weights within
these
ranges. However, the number of ethyleneoxy units (-C2H40) in the polyether
chain (R1)
must be sufficient to render the polyalkyleneoxide polysiloxane water
dispersible or water
soluble. If propyleneoxy groups are present in the polyalkylenoxy chain, they
can be
distributed randomly in the chain or exist as blocks. Preferred Silwet
surfactants are L-
7600, L-7602, L-7604, L-7605, L-7657, and mixtures thereof. Besides surface
activity,
polyalkyleneoxide polysiloxane surfactants can also provide other benefits,
such as
antistatic benefits, lubricity and softness to fabrics.
The preparation of polyalkyleneoxide polysiloxanes is well known in the art.
Polyalkyleneoxide polysiloxanes of the present invention can be prepared
according to the
procedure set forth in U.S. Pat. No. 3,299,112, incorporated herein by
reference.
Typically, polyalkyleneoxide polysiloxanes of the surfactant blend of the
present
invention are readily prepared by an addition reaction between a hydrosiloxane
(i.e., a
siloxane containing silicon-bonded hydrogen) and an allcenyl ether (e.g., a
vinyl, allyl, or
methallyl ether) of an allcoxy or hydroxy end-blocked polyalkylene oxide). The
reaction
conditions employed in addition reactions of this type are well known in the
art and in
general involve heating the reactants (e.g., at a temperature of from about
85° C. to 110°
C.) in the presence of a platinum catalyst (e.g., chloroplatinic acid) and a
solvent (e.g.,
toluene).
Nonlimiting examples of compatible anionic surfactants are the alkyldiphenyl
oxide disulfonate, having the general formula:
S03Na S03Na
O
R
wherein R is an all~yl group. Examples of this type of surfactants are
available from the
Dow Chemical Company under the trade name Dowfax~ wherein R is a linear or
12
CA 02425068 2003-03-17
WO 02/28179 PCT/US00/27018
branched C6-C16 alkyl group. An example of these cyclodextrin-compatible
anionic
surfactant is Dowfax 3B2 with R being approximately a linear C10 group. These
anionic
surfactants are preferably not used when the composition contains a cationic
material so
as to minimize the interaction with the cationic actives, since the effect of
both surfactant
and active are diminished.
MITICIDES
Miticides can be optionally added to the compositions of the present invention
to
kill mites. As is discussed above, mites corpses are allergenic so killing the
mites does
not necessarily reduce the level of allergens. But dead mites cannot breed, so
killing a
portion of the mites can help to control the mite population.
Miticides acceptable for use in the present invention include compounds known
under the common names as resuethrin, phenothrin, permethrin, allethrins,
tetramethrin,
furamethrin, cypermethrin, decamethrin, phenvalerate, phenpropathrin,
terallethrin,
empenthrin and pyrethrin. Additional miticides include pyrethroid compounds
such as 1-
ethynyl-2-methyl-2-pentenyl-2,2-dimethyl-3-3-(2,2-dichlorovinyl)-cyclopropane-
1-
carboxylate, 1-ethynyl-2-methyiyl-2-pentenyl-2,2,3,3-tetramethylcyclopropane-1-
carboxylate, a-cyano-3-phenoxybenzyl-2,2-dimethyl-3-(2,2,3-tribromethyl)-
cyclopropane-1-carboxylate; organic phosphorus compounds such as sumithion,
fenthion,
tetrachlorvinphos, diazinon and DDVP; and carbamate compounds such as those
sold
under the trademarks Baygon and Sevin.
A number of less toxic miticidal agents have been proposed for use in
controlling
dust mites. As noted in U.S. Patent No. 4,800,196, these include phenyl
salicylate,
diphenylamine, methyl (3-naphthyl lcetone, coumarin, phenethyl benzoate,
benzyl
salicylate, phenyl benzoate, N-fluorodichloromethylthio-cyclohexene-
dicarboxyimide, p-
nitrobenzoic acid methyl ester, p-chlorometaxylenol, a,-bromocinnamic
aldehyde, 2,5-
dichloro-4-bromophenol, N,N-dimethyl-N'-tryl-N'-(fluorodichloromethylthio)-
sulfamide,
2-phenylphenol, sodium 2-phenylphenolate, 5-chloro-2-methyl-4-isothiazoline-3-
one, 2-
methyl-4-isothiazonoline-3-one and benzimidazolylmethyl-carbamate and mixtures
of
these. One of the more effective agents for killing dust mites is benzyl
benzoate, a
compound which is readily available and inexpensive.
When one or more optional miticides are added to the composition of the
present
invention they are typically present at a level of from about 0.01 % to about
20%,
preferably from about 0.1% to about 10%, more preferably from about 0.2% to
about 8%
by weight of the usage composition.
13
CA 02425068 2003-03-17
WO 02/28179 PCT/US00/27018
COLOR STABILIZATIONINGREDIENTS
The allergen neutralization compositions can optionally include ingredients to
prevent color formation either in the product or on the fabrics and articles
on which it is
sprayed. As mentioned above, some of the allergen denaturing compounds,
especially the
preferred tannins, are known to discolor fabric materials. The optional color
stabilization
ingredients are intended to reduce or eliminate the discoloration problem.
When used, the
color stabilization ingredient will be present at a concentration of from
about 0.1 % to
about 25%, preferably from about 0.2% to about 15% and more preferably from
about 1%
to about 10%, by weight of the allergen neutralization composition. Preferred
chemicals
include glycolic acid and its salts, lactic acid and its salts, gluconic acid
and its salts,
pyruvic acid and its salts, glucaric acid and its salts, ascorbic acid and its
salts, hydroxy
benzoic acids and the salts, aspartic acid and its salts, hydroxyglutamic acid
and its salts,
hydroxyphathalic acids and the salts, malic acid and its salts, and mixtures
thereof.
Soluble detergent builders can also be included for color stabilization.
Included
among the soluble polycarboxylate builders are a variety of categories of
useful materials.
One important category of polycarboxylate builders encompasses the ether
polycarboxylates, including oxydisuccinate, as disclosed in Berg, U.S.
3,128,287, U.S.
3,635,830. See also "TMS/TDS" builders of U.S. 4,663,071. Suitable ether
polycarboxylates also include cyclic compounds, particularly alicyclic
compounds, such
as those described in U.S. 3,923,679; 3,835,163; 4,158,635; 4,120,874 and
4,102,903.
Other useful builders include the ether hydroxypolycarboxylates, copolymers of
malefic anhydride with ethylene or vinyl methyl ether, l, 3, 5-trihydroxy
benzene-2, 4, 6
trisulphonic acid, and carboxymethyloxysuccinic acid, the various salts of
polyacetic acids
such as ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid and nitrilotriacetic acid, as well as
polycarboxylates such as mellitic acid, pyromellitic, succinic acid,
oxydisuccinic acid,
polymaleic acid, benzene 1,3,5-tricarboxylic acid, carboxymethyloxysuccinic
acid, and
soluble salts thereof.
Citrate builders, e.g., citric acid and soluble salts thereof (particularly
sodium salt),
are polycarboxylate builders of particular importance due to their
availability from
renewable resources and their biodegradability. Oxydisuccinates are also
especially
useful in such compositions and combinations. Other suitable polycarboxylates
are
disclosed in U.S 4,144,226 and in U.S. 3,308,067. See also U.S. 3,723,322.
Also suitable in the compositions of the present invention are the 3,3-
dicarboxy-4-
oxa-1,6-hexanedioates and the related compounds disclosed in U.S. 4,566,984.
Useful
14
CA 02425068 2003-03-17
WO 02/28179 PCT/US00/27018
succinic acid builders include the CS-C20 alkyl and alkenyl succinic acids and
salts
thereof. A particularly preferred compound of this type is dodecenylsuccinic
acid.
Specific examples of succinate builders include: laurylsuccinate,
myristylsuccinate,
palmitylsuccinate, 2-dodecenylsuccinate (preferred), 2-pentadecenylsuccinate,
and the
like. Laurylsuccinates are the preferred builders of this group, and are
described in EP
0,200,263.
Fatty acids, e.g., C12-Clg monocarboxylic acids such as oleic acid and/or its
salts,
can also be incorporated into the compositions alone, or in combination with
the aforesaid
builders, especially citrate and/or the succinate builders, to provide
additional builder
activity. Such use of fatty acids will generally result in a diminution of
foaming, which
should be taken into account by the formulator.
In situations where phosphorus-based builders can be used, the various alkali
metal phosphates such as the well-known sodium tripolyphosphates, sodium
pyrophosphate and sodium orthophosphate can be used. Phosphonate builders such
as
ethane-1-hydroxy-1,1-diphosphonate and other known phosphoriates (see, for
example,
U.S. Patents 3,159,581; 3,213,030; 3,422,021; 3,400,148 and 3,422,137) can
also be used.
PERFUME
The allergen neutralization compositions of the present invention can also
optionally include a perfume to provide a pleasing scent to the spray product.
The
perfume should not be desig~led to be overwhelming or to be used as an odor
mashing
ingredient. Perfumes are typically added at low levels, e.g., from about 0% to
about
0.5%, preferably from about 0.003% to about 0.3%, more preferably from about
0.005%
to about 0.2%, by weight of the usage composition.
Perfume can also be added as a more intense odor in product and on surfaces.
When stronger levels of perfume are preferred, relatively higher levels of
perfume can be
added. Any type of perfume can be incorporated into the composition of the
present
invention. Preferably the perfume is hydrophilic and is composed predominantly
of
ingredients selected from two groups of ingredients, namely, (a) hydrophilic
ingredients
having a ClogP of less than about 3.5, more preferably less than about 3.0,
and (b)
ingredients having significant low detection threshold, and mixtures thereof.
Typically, at
least about 50%, preferably at least about 60%, more preferably at least about
70%, and
most preferably at least about 80% by weight of the perfume is composed of
perfume
ingredients of the above groups (a) and (b). Suitable perfume ingredients can
be found in
CA 02425068 2003-03-17
WO 02/28179 PCT/US00/27018
US Patent No. 5,670,475, which issued to Trinh et al. On September 23, 1997.
The entire
disclosure of the Trinh patent is incorporated herein by reference.
OTHER OPTIONAL INGREDIENTS
The compositions of the present invention can optionally contain ingredients
including, solution phase stabilizers, chelating agents, antistatic agents,
colorants,
especially bluing agents, antioxidants, and mixtures thereof. The total level
of optional
ingredients is low, preferably less than about 8.0%, more preferably less than
about 5.0%,
and even more preferably less than about 3.0%, by weight of the usage
composition.
Solution phase stabilizers include, alkali metal salts, for example, NaCl,
CaCl2, MgCl2,
ICI, I~S04, and they are added to modify viscosity as well as to stabilize the
solution.
These optional ingredients exclude the other ingredients specifically
mentioned
hereinbefore.
Colorant
Colorants and dyes, especially bluing agents, can be optionally added to the
present compositions for visual appeal and performance impression. When
colorants are
used, they are used at extremely low levels to avoid fabric staining.
Preferred colorants
for use in the present compositions are highly water-soluble dyes, e.g.,
Liquitint~ dyes
available from Milliken Chemical Co. Non-limiting examples of suitable dyes
are,
Liquitint Blue HP~, Liquitint Blue 65~, Liquitint Patent Blue~, Liquitint
Royal Blue~,
Liquitint Experimental Yellow 8949-43~, Liquitint Green HMC~, Liquitint Yellow
II~,
and mixtures thereof, preferably Liquitint Blue HP~, Liquitint Blue 65~,
Liquitint Patent
Blue~, Liquitint Royal Blue~, Liquitint Experimental Yellow 8949-43~, and
mixtures
thereof.
Outional Preservative
Optionally, but preferably, solubilized, water-soluble, antimicrobial
preservative
can be added to the compositions. Because microbial growth in aqueous
solutions is
highly objectionable when it occurs, it is highly preferable to include a
solubilized, water-
soluble, antimicrobial preservative, which is effective for inhibiting or
regulating
microbial growth in order to increase storage stability of the preferably
clear, aqueous
allergen neutralization compositions of this invention.
It is preferable to use a broad spectrum preservative, e.g., one that is
effective on
both bacteria (both gram positive and gram negative) and fungi. A limited
spectrum
preservative, e.g., one that is only effective on a single group of
microorganisms, e.g.,
fungi, can be used in combination with a broad spectrum preservative or other
limited
16
CA 02425068 2003-03-17
WO 02/28179 PCT/US00/27018
spectrum preservatives with complimentary and/or supplementary activity. A
mixture of
broad spectrum preservatives can also be used. In some cases where a specific
group of
microbial contaminants is problematic (such as Gram negatives),
aminocarboxylate
chelators may be used alone or as potentiators in conjunction with other
preservatives.
These chelators, which include, e.g., ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA),
hydroxyethylenediaminetriacetic acid, diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid, and
other
aminocarboxylate chelators, and mixtures thereof, and their salts, and
mixtures thereof,
can increase preservative effectiveness against Gram-negative bacteria,
especially
Pseudomonas species.
Antimicrobial preservatives useful in the present invention include biocidal
compounds, i.e., substances that kill microorganisms, or biostatic compounds,
i.e.,
substances that inhibit and/or regulate the growth of microorganisms.
Preferred antimicrobial preservatives are those that are water-soluble and are
effective at low levels. Water-soluble preservatives useful in the present
invention are
those that have a solubility in water of at least about 0.3 g per 100 ml of
water, i.e., greater
than about 0.3% at room temperature, preferably greater than about 0.5% at
room
temperature.
The water-soluble antimicrobial preservative in the present invention is
included
at an effective amount. The teen "effective amount" as herein defined means a
level
sufficient to prevent spoilage, or prevent growth of inadvertently added
microorganisms,
for a specific period of time. In other words, the preservative is not being
used to kill
microorganisms on the surface onto which the composition is deposited in order
to
eliminate odors produced by microorganisms. Instead, it is preferably being
used to
prevent spoilage of the allergen neutralization composition in order to
increase the shelf
life of the composition. Preferred levels of preservative are from about
0.0001% to about
0.5%, more preferably from about 0.0002% to about 0.2%, most preferably from
about
0.0003% to about 0.1%, by weight of the usage composition.
The preservative can be any organic preservative material which will not cause
damage to fabric appearance, e.g., discoloration, coloration, bleaching.
Preferred water
soluble preservatives include organic sulfur compounds, halogenated compounds,
cyclic
organic nitrogen compounds, low molecular weight aldehydes, quaternary
ammonium
compounds, dehydroacetic acid, phenyl and phenolic compounds, and mixtures
thereof.
w..+, n..:a~..+
The compositions of the present invention can optionally comprise anti-
oxidants.
The level of anti-oxidants can vary widely depending upon the end use ~ of the
17
CA 02425068 2003-03-17
WO 02/28179 PCT/US00/27018
composition. When present, the compositions will typically comprise from about
0.01%
to about 10%, more typically from about 0.1% to about 5%, by weight, of anti-
oxidants.
Preferred anti-oxidants herein are selected from the group consisting of D
isoascorbic acid, Dibutyl hydroxy toluene (BHT), dl-alpha-tocophenol, n-
dodecyl gallate,
styrenated phenol, 4, 4'-butylidene,bis (6-ter-butyl-3-methylpheno), 4,4'-thin
bis (6-tert
butyl-3-methylphenol), 1,1-bis (4-hydroxyphenyl)cyclohexane, 2,2,thio (diethyl
bis 3,3,5-
di-t-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl) propionate, hexane-1,6-diamine, N, N'-bis (-
2,2,6,6,-
tetramethyl-4-diperidinyl), and mixture therof.
II. ARTICLE OF MANUFACTURE
The compositions of the present invention can also be used in an article of
manufacture comprising said composition plus a spray dispenser. When the
commercial
embodiment of the article of manufacture is used, it is optional, but
preferable, to include
the preservative.
SPRAYDISPENSER
The article of manufacture herein comprises a spray dispenser. The allergen
neutralization composition is placed into a spray dispenser in order to be
distributed onto
fabrics or other surfaces. The spray dispenser is preferably any of the
manually activated
means for producing a spray of liquid droplets as is known in the art, e.g.
trigger-type,
pump-type, non-aerosol self pressurized, and aerosol-type spray means. The
spray
dispenser herein does not normally include those that will substantially foam
the allergen
neutralization composition. It has been found that the performance is
increased by
providing smaller particle droplets. Desirably, the Sauter mean particle
diameter is from
about 10 ~m to about 120 ~,m, more preferably, from about 20 ~,m to about 100
~,m.
The spray dispenser can be an aerosol dispenser. An aerosol dispenser
comprises
a container which can be constructed of any of the conventional materials
employed in
fabricating aerosol containers. The dispenser must be capable of withstanding
internal
pressure in the range of from about 20 to about 110 p.s.i.g., more preferably
from about
20 to about 70 p.s.i.g. One important requirement concerning the dispenser is
that it be
provided with a valve member which will permit the allergen neutralization
composition
contained in the dispenser to be dispensed in the form of a spray of very
fine, or finely
divided, particles or droplets. The aerosol dispenser utilizes a pressurized
sealed
container from which the allergen neutralization composition is dispensed
through a
special actuator/valve assembly under pressure. The aerosol dispenser is
pressurized by
18
CA 02425068 2003-03-17
WO 02/28179 PCT/US00/27018
incorporating therein a gaseous component generally known as a propellant.
Common
aerosol propellants, e.g., gaseous hydrocarbons such as isobutane, and mixed
halogenated
hydrocarbons, which are not preferred. Halogenated hydrocarbon propellants
such as
chlorofluoro hydrocarbons have been alleged to contribute to environmental
problems.
Preferred propellants are compressed air, nitrogen, inert gases, carbon
dioxide, etc. A
more complete description of commercially available aerosol-spray dispensers
appears in
U.S. Pat. Nos.: 3,436,772, Stebbins, issued April 8, 1969; and 3,600,325,
Kaufinan et al.,
issued August 17, 1971; both of said references are incorporated herein by
reference.
Preferably the spray dispenser can be a self pressurized non-aerosol container
having a convoluted liner and an elastomeric sleeve. Said self pressurized
dispenser
comprises a liner/sleeve assembly containing a thin, flexible radially
expandable
convoluted plastic liner of from about 0.010 to about 0.020 inch thick, inside
an
essentially cylindrical elastomeric sleeve. The liner/sleeve is capable of
holding a
substantial quantity of odor-absorbing fluid product and of causing said
product to be
dispensed. A more complete description of self pressurized spray dispensers
can be
found in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,111,971, Winer, issued May 12, 1992, and 5,232,126,
Winer,
issued Aug. 3, 1993; both of said references are herein incorporated by
reference.
Another type of aerosol spray dispenser is one wherein a barrier separates the
odor
absorbing composition from the propellant (preferably compressed air or
nitrogen), as
disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,260,110, issued April 7, 1981, and incorporated
herein by
reference. Such a dispenser is available from EP Spray Systems, East Hanover,
New
Jersey.
More preferably, the spray dispenser is a non-aerosol, manually activated,
pump-
spray dispenser. Said pmnp-spray dispenser comprises a container and a pump
mechanism which securely screws or snaps onto the container. The container
comprises a
vessel for containing the aqueous odor-absorbing composition to be dispensed.
The pump mechanism comprises a pump chamber of substantially fixed volume,
having an opening at the inner end thereof. Within the pump chamber is located
a pump
stem having a piston on the end thereof disposed for reciprocal motion in the
pump
chamber. The pump stem has a passageway there through with a dispensing outlet
at the
outer end of the passageway and an axial inlet port located inwardly thereof.
The container and the pump mechanism can be constructed of any conventional
material employed in fabricating pump-spray dispensers, including, but not
limited to:
polyethylene; polypropylene; polyethyleneterephthalate; blends of
polyethylene, vinyl
acetate, and rubber elastomer. A preferred container is made of clear, e.g.,
polyethylene
19
CA 02425068 2003-03-17
WO 02/28179 PCT/US00/27018
terephthalate. Other materials can include stainless steel. A more complete
disclosure of
commercially available dispensing devices appears in: U.S. Pat. Nos.:
4,895,279,
Schultz, issued January 23, 1990; 4,735,347, Schultz et al., issued April 5,
1988; and
4,274,560, Carter, issued June 23, 1981; all of said references are herein
incorporated by
reference.
Most preferably, the spray dispenser is a manually activated trigger-spray
dispenser. Said trigger-spray dispenser comprises a container and a trigger
both of which
can be constructed of any of the conventional material employed in fabricating
trigger-
spray dispensers, including, but not limited to: polyethylene; polypropylene;
polyacetal;
polycarbonate; polyethyleneterephthalate; polyvinyl chloride; polystyrene;
blends of
polyethylene, vinyl acetate, and rubber elastomer. Other materials can include
stainless
steel and glass. A preferred container is made of clear, e.g. polyethylene
terephthalate.
The trigger-spray dispenser does not incorporate a propellant gas into the
odor-absorbing
composition, and preferably it does not include those that will foam the odor-
absorbing
composition. The trigger-spray dispenser herein is typically one which acts
upon a
discrete amount of the odor-absorbing composition itself, typically by means
of a piston
or a collapsing bellows that displaces the composition through a nozzle to
create a spray
of thin liquid. The trigger-spray dispenser typically comprises a pump chamber
having
either a piston or bellows which is movable through a limited stroke response
to the
trigger for varying the volume of said pump chamber. This pump chamber or
bellows
chamber collects and holds the product for dispensing. The trigger spray
dispenser
typically has an outlet check valve for blocking communication and flow of
fluid through
the nozzle and is responsive to the pressure inside the chamber. For the
piston type
trigger sprayers, as the trigger is compressed, it acts on the fluid in the
chamber and the
spring, increasing the pressure on the fluid. For the bellows spray dispenser,
as the
bellows is compressed, the pressure increases on the fluid. The increase in
fluid pressure
in either trigger spray dispenser acts to open the top outlet check valve. The
top valve
allows the product to be forced through the swirl chamber and out the nozzle
to form a
discharge pattern. An adjustable nozzle cap can be used to vary the pattern of
the fluid
dispensed.
For the piston spray dispenser, as the trigger is released, the spring acts on
the
piston to return it to its original position. For the bellows spray dispenser,
the bellows
acts as the spring to return to its original position. This action causes a
vacuum in the
chamber. The responding fluid acts to close the outlet valve while opening the
inlet valve
drawing product up to the chamber from the reservoir.
CA 02425068 2003-03-17
WO 02/28179 PCT/US00/27018
A more complete disclosure of commercially available dispensing devices
appears
in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,082,223, Nozawa, issued Apr. 4, 1978; 4,161, 288,
McI~inney, issued
Jul. 17, 1985; 4,434,917, Saito et al., issued Mar. 6, 1984; and 4,819,835,
Tasalci, issued
Apr. 11, 1989; 5,303,867, Peterson, issued Apr. 19, 1994; all of said
references are
incorporated herein by reference.
A broad array of trigger sprayers or finger pump sprayers are suitable for use
with
the compositions of this invention. These are readily available from suppliers
such as
Calinar, Inc., City of Industry, California; CSI (Continental Sprayers, Inc.),
St. Peters,
Missouri; Berry Plastics Corp., Evansville, Indiana, a distributor of Guala~
sprayers; or
Seaquest Dispensing, Cary, Illinois.
The preferred trigger sprayers are the blue inserted Guala~ sprayer, available
from
Berry Plastics Corp., or the Calmar TS800-lA~ , TS1300~, and TS-800-2~,
available
from Calmar Inc., because of the fine uniform spray characteristics, spray
volume, and
pattern size. More preferred are sprayers with precompression features and
finer spray
characteristics and even distribution, such as Yoshino sprayers from Japan.
Any suitable
bottle or container can be used with the trigger sprayer, the preferred bottle
is a 17 fl-oz.
bottle (about 500 ml) of good ergonomics similar in shape to the Cinch~
bottle. It can be
made of any materials such as high density polyethylene, polypropylene,
polyvinyl
chloride, polystyrene, polyethylene terephthalate, glass, or any other
material that forms
bottles. Preferably, it is made of high density polyethylene or clear
polyethylene
terephthalate.
For smaller fluid ounce sizes ( such as 1 to 8 ounces), a finger pump can be
used
with canister or cylindrical bottle. The preferred pump for this application
is the
cylindrical Euromist II~ from Seaquest Dispensing. More preferred are those
with
precompression features.
III. METHOD OF USE
The present compositions can be used by distributing, e.g., by placing the
allergen
neutralizing composition into a dispensing means, preferably a spray dispenser
and
spraying an effective amount onto the desired surface or article. An effective
amount is
defined herein as an amount to neutralize at least about 50%, preferably at
least about
60%, more preferably at least about 80%, and most preferably at least about
90% of the
allergens on the surface or article that is sprayed. The amount of allergen
that is
neutralized can be measured by the Elisa test defined below. The delivery
mechanism
, should be controlled such that a pool of liquid is not created on the
axticle or surface and
21
CA 02425068 2003-03-17
WO 02/28179 PCT/US00/27018
so that when dry there is no visual deposit readily discernible. Distribution
can be
achieved by using a spray device, a roller, a pad, etc.
The present invention encompasses the method of spraying an effective amount
of
allergen neutralizing composition onto household surfaces. Preferably the
household
surfaces are selected from the group consisting of countertops, cabinets,
walls, floors,
bathroom surfaces and kitchen surfaces.
The present invention encompasses the method of spraying a mist of an
effective
amount of allergen neutralizing composition onto fabric and/or fabric
articles. Preferably,
the fabric and/or fabric articles include, but are not limited to, clothes,
curtains, drapes,
upholstered furniture, carpeting, bed linens, bath linens, tablecloths,
sleeping bags, tents,
car interior, etc.
The present invention relates to the method of spraying a mist of an effective
amount of allergen neutralizing composition onto cat litter, pet bedding and
pet houses.
EXAMPLES
The following are non-limiting examples of allergen neutralization
compositions
according to the present invention, and standardized methods for measuring
Dust Control,
friction, efficacy and fabric coloration of the present compositions.
EXAMPLE I
Dust Control Test
This test method measures and quantifies the amount of dust retained on a
fabric
surface after treatment with a test composition. The test method is conducted
on a 30cm
x 30cm swatch of white cotton muslim, 86/14 blend with polyester. On the
fabric swatch,
spread evenly 2 grams of vacuum cleaner dust that has been sieved through a 37
micron
filter. Spray approximately lOg of the test composition on the fabric swatch
with a
standard sprayer to cover the surface completely. The bottle of test
composition should
be weighed before and after spraying to insure the delivery of lOg of
solution, but it is
understood that a small portion of the spray will be lost as "overspray".
Weigh the fabric
and allow it to dry overnight under controlled humidity and temperature. Weigh
the dry
fabric, and then mount the fabric on a solid surface with the treated side
facing up. Using
a Hoover canister vacuum cleaner on its lowest setting, gently vacuum the
entire surface
area of the fabric one time. Weigh the fabric to obtain the final weight of
the fabric and
residual dust. The weight of the fabric and dust initially (before spraying
the
composition) is subtracted from the final weight to obtain the weight of the
residual dust.
22
CA 02425068 2003-03-17
WO 02/28179 PCT/US00/27018
Preferred allergen neutralization compositions according to the present
invention retain
more than about 30%, preferably more than about 35%, and even more preferably
more
than about 40%, by weight, of the starting dust amount.
TABLE I
Film Form Agent Weight % % Of Dust Retained
Water 100 <10
Methyl Cellulose* 0.5 >40
CTFA Polyquarternium-6*5.0 >50
*The remainder of the composition is water
EXAMPLE II
Friction Coefficient Analysis
This test measures the "slipperiness" of a fabric sprayed with a test
composition.
This test is a standardized test well known to the textile industry. The
allergen
neutralization compositions of the present invention have an average MILT
value of less
than 3.4, preferably less than 3.2, more preferably less than about 3.0 as
measured by the
Friction Coefficient Analysis method.
Method
Spray approximately 3 grams of the test composition onto a lOcm x lOcm fleece
swatch (100% polyester). Dry the swatch at room temperature. Measure the
friction on
the fabric with a KES-SE-STP Friction Tester (available from Kato Tech.,
Kyoto, Japan)
under the conditions described below.
Sensor: Piano wire, 1x1 cm
Speed of sensor movement: 1.0 mm/sec
Load: 25 gf
Measurement: 20 mm while sensor moves 30 mm; three times each for
vertically and horizontally
TABLE II
Sample ~ ~ MIU x 20-
2
Water I Vertical I 2.820
2.620
2.110
I Horizontal I 2.440 I
23
CA 02425068 2003-03-17
WO 02/28179 PCT/US00/27018
2.520
2.430
Average 2.490
Composition 1, from Table Vertical 2.960
V A,
Example V 2.780
2.820
Horizontal 3.080
3.120
3.310
Average 3.012
Composition 1, from Table Vertical 3.390
V A,
Example V, with the addition 3.500
of 1.5%, by weight of 3.780
Cyclodextrin Horizontal 3.840
3.430
4.040
Average 3.663
EXAMPLE III
Efficacy Determination Protocol, "ELISA"
The efficacy of an allergen neutralization composition can be determined by
the
ELISA protocol. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay ("ELISA") is a highly
sensitive
assay technique for detection and measurement of antigens or antibodies in
solution. The
assay uses enzyme-linked antigens or antibodies to amplify an antigen-antibody
reaction.
A single enzyme-linked antibody-antigen complex can convert orders of
magnitude more
of colorless substrate molecules into detectable colored products, thus
considerably
amplifying the original antigen-antibody reaction. The antigen or antibody is
adsorbed
onto the surface of the well of a microtiter plate, and all the relevant
reactions take place
in solution inside the well. While the following protocol will be easily
understood by
those skilled in the art, for a more detailed explanation please see Konishi,
E. and Uehara,
K. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for quantifying antigens of
Derfyaatoplaagoides
fa~inae and D. pteronyssihus (Acari: Pyroglyphidae) in house dust samples,
1990,
Efatomologist Society ofAmerica, 27 (6), p. 993-998.
24
CA 02425068 2003-03-17
WO 02/28179 PCT/US00/27018
It is understood that those skilled in the art of allergen suppression will be
aware
of numerous variations to the protocol given below. For example, the
monoclonal
antibody may be substituted with a similar antibody, for example Der f 1 for
Der f 2. But
a standard, in this case water, is used and the results for the samples that
contain active
ingredients are normalized against the standard and the results reported as
percentage of
allergen remaining That is, the amount of allergen that is not neutralized.
Thus, the
allergen neutralization results for similar, but not identical antibodies
should be
substantially the same when normalized to the standard. Both Der f 1 and Der f
2 were
tested for various compositions, but Der f 2 was chosen as the standard for
the present
Efficacy Determination Protocol because it is more difficult to neutralize. To
be clear, the
values for the % of allergen remaining that are reported in Table I will
generally improve
(that is, decrease) when tested with Der f 1.
Saynple Preparation
At least two samples are prepared. One sample contains only distilled water
and
samples of one or more allergen neutralization compositions containing the
allergen
neutralization active, for example ZnCl2, tannin, etc. The samples are all
treated
according to the same protocol, and the distilled water sample is used as the
control. All
samples are prepared as follows:
1) Add 1.0 ml of 20ug/ml Der f 2 mite extract to 0.8 ml of the sample
composition (either
the allergen neutralization composition or water for the control). Mix well
and let sit for 1
hour at room temp.
2) Add 2.2 ml of 20% skim mills in Phosphate Buffer Saline (PBS).
3) Mix well by vortexing and centrifuge at 12000 rpm (approx. 17000xg) for 1
hour.
4) The supernatant is used for the ELISA protocol.
ELISA Protocol
Each well of a microplate is coated at 4°C overnight with 100 ~,1 of
Der f 2
monoclonal antibody (clone 15E11, from Asahi Breweries., AB-A-4) at a protein
concentration of 2 ~g per ml of Phosphate Buffer Saline (PBS), pH 7.4
containing 0.1%
sodium azide. The monoclonal antibody is discarded and the plate is incubated
with 100
~,l of 1% BSA PBS containing 0.1% sodium azide for 1 hour. The plate is washed
3 times
with PBS containing 0.05% Tween 20 (PBS-T). 100 ~1 of an allergen sample is
added and
incubated for 1 hour at 37°C.
LTse 3x dilutions of a reference Dermatophagoides farinae crude extract
(commercially available from I,SL) to make the standard curve. The curve is
made using
6.9 nanogram-mite extract equivalent/ml to 5 microgram-mite extract
equivalent/ml.
CA 02425068 2003-03-17
WO 02/28179 PCT/US00/27018
Wash plate with PBS-T for 3 times. 100 ~.l of Horse Radish Peroxidase (HRP)
conjugated anti Der f 2 antibody (clone 13A4) is added at 40 ng/ml and the
plate is
incubated at 37°C for 1 hour. The plate is then washed with PBS-T 3
times and then
washed with water 3 times. The wells are incubated with 100 ~.1 of o-phenylene
diamine
at 2.0 mg/ml of O.1M phosphate buffer (pH 6.2) containing 0.03% HZOZ. The
enzyme
reaction is terminated by adding 50 ~,1 of 2 M H2S04.
The absorbance of the sample is read at 490 nm with a cell length of 1 cm. The
absorbance reading is directly proportional to the quantity of Der f 2 bound
and the values
calculated from the respective standard curve (Optical Density, or absorbance
range is
0.001 to 3.6). The absorbance reading for the control (water) is considered as
0% allergen
neutralization (100% of the Der f 2 remaining) and an absorbance reading of 0
is
considered 100% allergen neutralization (0% of the Der f 2 remaining). The
absorbance
of the active containg samples) is then normalized based on these two end
points.
As stated above, the allergen neutralization compositions of the present
invention
neutralize at least about 50%, preferably at least about 60%, more preferably
at least about
80% and most preferably at least about 90% of allergen containing proteins as
measured
by the ELISA test protocol.
Table III illustrates that the "effective amount" of the metal ion will vary
depending on the metal and its associated anion. The concentration of 1.4% was
an
arbitrary selection, but one can see that except for FeS04, all of the metals
remove more
than 50% of the allergen. Thus, the effective amount to remove 50% of
allergens for
FeS04 is greater than 1.4%, while the effective amount for the same removal
rate for
SnCl2 is substantially less than 1.4%. Moreover, the effective amount will
vary based on
the desired allergen removal amount. For example, if 80% removal is necessary,
then the
effective amount of ZnCl2 will be slightly greater than 1.4%, and the
effective amount for
SnCl2 will be about 1.4%. Those skilled in the art will be able to determine
the effective
amount for different metal ions with various anions without undue
experimentation using
the teachings and Examples herein.
TABLE III
Active Wt. % pH Average % of Allergen
Compound of Ion* Absorbance Remaining
Control 0 - 1.7 100
ZnCl2 1.4 3.6 0.70 34
SnCl2 1.4 2.1 0.54 32
26
CA 02425068 2003-03-17
WO 02/28179 PCT/US00/27018
SnCl2 1.4 3.2 0.25 18
SnS04 1.4 2.0 0.28 22
FeS04 1.4 3.5 1.13 54
FeCl2 1.4 2.9 0.84 44
*% by weight of the active ion in the allergen neutralization composition
before the
Sample Preparation.
EXAMPLE IV
Fabric Color Evaluation Method
A standard Hunter Color Meter Analysis is performed on fabrics that are
treated
with sample allergen neutralization compositions. As was described above, it
is desirable
that the present compositions do not stain or discolor common household
surfaces such as
fabrics, for example, bed covers, floor coverings, and curtains, and hard
surfaces, for
example, counter tops, furniture, doors and walls. A standardized test is
given below that
tests the propensity for a given sample composition to stain a test fabric.
Acceptable
performance for this test method will generally mean a composition can be used
on
household surfaces without fear of substantial discoloration.
As stated above, the allergen neutralization compositions of the present
invention
yield a ~E value of less than about 3.5, preferably, less than about 3.0, and
more
preferably less than about 1.0 as measured by Fabric Color Evaluation method.
Sample Preparation
Spray approximately 15 grams of a sample composition on a 20x20 cm cotton lmit
(100% cotton) fabric swatch. Spray approximately 15 grams of distilled water
on a similar
20x20 cm fabric swatch. Dry the fabric swatches near a glass-window to expose
them to
sun light. Leave the swatches near the window for 2-3 days after they have
dried. The sun
light accelerates the color development. The treated and non-treated fabric
swatches are
ready for analysis by the method defined below.
Instrument
The instrument used in this method is a ColorQUEST 45/0 from Hunter
Association Laboratory Inc., Virginia (USA). The light source is D65.
Method
The "L", "a", and "b" values for each fabric swatch are measured at three
different
places. L, a, and b values are measured both for the treated fabric swatches
and the control
fabric swatch. "L" measures lightness and varies from 100 (for perfect white)
to zero (for
black); "a" measures the intensity of red (plus), gray (zero) and green
(minus); "b"
27
CA 02425068 2003-03-17
WO 02/28179 PCT/US00/27018
measures the intensity of yellow (plus), gray (zero) and blue (minus). ~E is
the difference
of "L a b" values from the standard. The Hunter Lab total color difference
(~E) is
calculated as follows:
QE _ 2 2 2
- ~~L +~a +~b
where: ~L = Z,SMp-LSTD~ ~a - aSMP ' aSTD~ Ob ' bSMP - bSTD
Safnple Measurements
Two solutions containing Tannic acid and Zinc chloride are prepared and a
third
solution containing only Zinc chloride is prepared. The concentration of
Tannic acid
(from Kanto Chemicals, Japan) is 0.025%, 0.05% and 0%, by weight in the three
solutions. The concentration of Zinc chloride (from Wako Pure Chemicals,
Japan) is
0.5%, by weight in all three samples. The three samples are each split into
two pairs of six
equal samples. The pH of each solution is adjusted to the desired pH of about
3.6. One
sample from each pair is adjusted with 110mM citrate buffer (citric acid and
sodium
citrate), and one sample from each pair is adjusted with 0.4mM HCI, as shown
in Table
IV below. Six sample swatches axe prepared according to the method given above
using
the six different compositions. The colors for each swatch, and a control
swatch, are
measured and the results are shown in the following Table:
TABLE IV
Tannic ZnCl2 pH adjusted L a b DE
acid (%) to
(%) 3.6 with
Standard 94.67 -0.19 1.18
(No
treatment)
0.025 0.5 HCl 92.22 -0.13 3.82 3.61
0.05 0.5 HCl 91.74 -0.21 4.21 4.22
0.025 0.5 citrate 94.87 -0.17 1.18 0.21
0.05 0.5 citrate 94.58 -0.17 1.24 0.15
0.0 0.5 HCL <0.1
0.0 0.5 citrate <0.1
In this test, the Citrate buffer (110 mM) prevents color formation on fabrics
treated with a combination of tannic acid (at least up to 0.05%) and Zinc ion.
It should
be noted that compositions containing no tannin create very little color
formation
regardless of the buffer solution.
28
CA 02425068 2003-03-17
WO 02/28179 PCT/US00/27018
EXAMPLE V
Table V contains sample compositions according to the present invention.
TABLE V A
Material 1 2 3 4 5
Wt. % Wt. % Wt. % Wt. % Wt.
MC1 0.5 1.0 0 0 .5
CTFA PQ 0 0 3.0 5.0 2.0
62
Zn ion 1.4 0 0 0 2.0
Tannin 0 0 0.5 0 1.0
Buffer3 0.05 0 0 0 0.2
Diethylene0.4 0.5 0.8 0.2 0
Glycol4
Wetting 0.05 0.1 0.5 0.1 0.1
agents
Ethanol 3.0 5.0 10.0 3.0 0
Water Balance Balance Balance Balance Balance
TABLE V B
Material 6 7 8 9 10
Wt. % Wt. % Wt. % Wt. % Wt.
MC1 1.0 0 0.5 0 1.0
CTFA PQ 0 5.0 0 5.0 1.5
62
Sn ion 0 0 3.0 4.0 2.0
Tannin 0 0 0.5 0 1.0
Buffer3 0 0 0.15 0.1 0.2
Diethylene0.4 0.5 0.8 0.2 0
Glycol4
Wetting 0.05 0.1 0.5 0.1 0.1
agents
NaCl2 0 3.0 0 0 3.0
Ethanol 3.0 5.0 10.0 3.0 0
Water Balance Balance Balance Balance Balance
1MC = Methyl Cellulose
29
CA 02425068 2003-03-17
WO 02/28179 PCT/US00/27018
2CTFA PQ 6 = Cosmetic Toiletry Fragrances Association polyquaternium 6
3Buffer is HCl, Citric acid, or mixtures of each
4A low molecular weight («5,000) Diethylene Glycol is used to neutralize the
odor
associated with ethanol
SWetting agent is Silwet L-7600 or Coco K3 (a cationic surfactant)
