Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
CA 02438984 2003-08-21
WO 02/070753 PCT/CA02/00244
-1-
Method of Processing Lignocellulosic Feedstock for Enhanced Xylose and
Ethanol Production
The present invention relates to pretreatment processes for the conversion of
lignocellulosic feedstocks into sugars. More specifically, the present
invention relates to
pretreatment processes for the conversion of lignocellulosic feedstocks into
sugars and
the subsequent conversion of sugars to ethanol.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The possibility of producing ethanol from.cellulose-containing lignocellulosic
feedstocks such as wood, cultivated crops like switch grass and waste
agricultural fibers
such as wheat straw and oat hulls has received much attention due to the
availability of
large amounts of feedstocks, the desirability to avoid burning or landfilling
cellulosic
waste materials, and the cleanliness of ethanol as a fuel compared to
gasoline.
The efficient conversion of cellulose from lignocellulosic material into
glucose
and the subsequent fermentation of glucose to ethanol represents a major
challenge.
Cellulose, which is the primary'constituent of lignocellulosic fibers,
consists of a
crystalline structure that is very resistant to breakdown, as is
hemicellulose, the second
most prevalent component. The conversion of lignocellulosic fibers to ethanol
requires:
1) liberating cellulose and hemicellulose from lignin or increasing the
accessibility of
cellulose and hemicellulose within the lignocellulosic feedstock to cellulase
enzymes, 2)
depolymerizing hemicellulose and cellulose carbohydrate polymers to free
sugars and,
3) fermenting the mixed hexose and pentose sugars to ethanol.
Methods used to convert cellulose to glucose typically include acid hydrolysis
(reviewed by Grethlein; Chemical Breakdown Of Cellulosic Materials,
J.APPL.CHEM.
BIOTECHNOL. 28:296-308 (1978)). Acid hydrolysis involves the use of either
concentrated or dilute acids. The concentrated acid process uses 72% by weight
sulfuric
acid or 42% by weight hydrochloric acid at room temperature to dissolve the
cellulose,
CA 02438984 2008-07-09
- 2 -
followed by dilution to 1% acid and heating to 100 C to 120 C for up to three
hours to convert
cellulose oligomers to glucose monomers. This process produces a high yield of
glucose, but
the recovery of the acid, and the specialized construction materials required
for the apparatus to
carry out this process are serious disadvantages. Similar problems are
encountered when
concentrated organic solvents are used for cellulose conversion.
U.S. Patent No. 5,536,325 describes a two-step process for the acid hydrolysis
of
lignocellulosic material to glucose. The first (mild) step depolymerizes the
hemicellulose to
xylose and other sugars. The second step depolymerizes the cellulose to
glucose. Even though
the process uses low levels of acid, the amount of acid required for the
hydrolysis of the
feedstock is substantial, and the resulting yield of glucose from cellulose is
poor.
Other methods for converting lignocellulosic material to ethanol use a
multistep
procedure in which the lignocellullosic material is first pretreated at high
temperature and
pressure and often in the presence of various chemicals. This pretreatment
process is thought to
increase the accessibility of cellulose within the lignocellulosic fibers for
subsequent conversion
steps. As a large portion of the cellulose within untreated lignocellulosic
material is
unaccessible for subsequent enzymatic conversion steps, the efficiency of this
pretreatment
phase can profoundly influence the overall efficiency and commercial
application of the entire
conversion process.
Among the more successful pretreatment processes for the conversion of
lignocellulosic
feedstock into glucose, are dilute acid prehydrolysis processes. One effective
dilute acid
hydrolysis pretreatment is steam explosion as disclosed in U.S. Patent No.
4,461,648 (Foody
process). In the Foody process, biomass is loaded into a vessel known as a
steam gun. Up to
1% acid is optionally added to the biomass in the steam gun or in a presoak.
The steam gun is
then filled very quickly with steam and held at high pressure for a set length
of time, known as
the cooking time. Once the cooking time elapses, the vessel is depressurized
rapidly to expel the
pretreated biomass. As a result of the rapid depressurization, the Foody
CA 02438984 2008-07-09
- 3 -
process has been termed "steam explosion". Specific parameters for steam
explosion
pretreatments are set out in U.S. Pat. No. 4,461,648; and Foody, et al, Final
Report,
Optimization of Steam Explosion Pretreatment, U.S. Department of Energy Report
ET230501
(April 1980).
U.S. Patent No. 4,237,226 describes the dilute-acid pretreatment of oak,
newsprint,
poplar, and corn stover by a continuous plug-flow reactor, a device that is
similar to an extruder.
Rotating screws convey a feedstock slurry through a small orifice, where
mechanical and
chemical action break down the fibers to increase the accessibility to
cellulose.
One shortcoming of dilute acid prehydrolysis is the high acid requirement. For
a clean
feedstock, such as washed hardwood, the sulfuric acid demand is 0.5% to 1% of
the dry weight
of the feedstock. For agricultural fibers, which can contain high levels of
silica, salts, and alkali
potassium compounds from the soil, the acid demand is about 10-fold higher,
reaching 5% to
7% by weight of feedstock. This adds significant additional cost to the
process. A second
drawback of using large amounts of acids in a prehydrolysis process is that an
acidified
feedstock must be neutralized to a pH between about 4.5 and about 5 prior to
enzymatic
hydrolysis with cellulase enzyme. The amount of caustic soda used to
neutralize acidified
feedstock is proportional to the amount of acid used to acidify the feedstock.
Thus, high acid
usage results in high caustic soda usage, which further increases the cost of
processing
lignocellulosic feedstock to ethanol.
Another drawback of steam explosion and other dilute acid pretreatment
processes is that
the while the treatment conditions significantly increase accessibility to
cellulose, these same
conditions result in the destruction and loss of xylose. Xylose is not as
stable as the other sugars
and has a tendency to break down in acid pretreatment conditions. The
breakdown of xylose
decreases the overall sugar yield that can be obtained from lignocellulosic
feedstocks and this in
turn decreases ethanol yield.
CA 02438984 2008-07-09
- 4 -
U.S. Patent No. 5,198,074 and U.S. Patent No. 4,857,145 disclose washing
chiped
feedstock with water prior to removing a soluble fraction, used for the
production of ethanol,
and a fibre fraction for use in pulp and paper production. There is no
disclosure of the use of the
pretreated fraction for the production of xylose or ethanol.
U.S. Patent No. 5,846,787 discloses processes for pretreating cellulosic
materials prior to
enzymatic conversion with cellulases. The process involves heating the
cellulosic materials in
water at a temperature at or above their glass transition temperature while
maintaining the pH of
the reaction medium in a range that avoids autohydrolysis of the cellulosic
materials. The
method is performed in place of a dilute acid or steam explosion pretreatment
process. The
water used in the pretreatment process of U.S. 5,846,787 is heated under
pressure to a
temperature in excess of 100 C, and thus requires a significant amount of
energy to heat the
water to such temperatures and is expensive and inefficient.
U.S. Patent No. 4,326,892 discloses a method of improving the recovery of
sugar from
sugar beets. Sugar beets contain primarily sucrose, with little cellulose. The
method comprises
washing sugar beets to remove impurities therefrom, removing the outer layer
of the of the
washed sugar beets, slicing the sugar beets and extracting the slice sugar
beets with an aqueous
solution. After this washing, the relative amount of cellulose in the
resulting beet pulp is
increased. There is no suggestion that the pulp obtained by this process may
be used for the
production of xylose or ethanol as described herein.
US 6,251,643 discloses a method for processing biomass using a screw press. In
this
method, following separation of a liquid phase from the solid phase, the solid
phase is heated
under pressure, to a temperature of 100-170 C, to produce a vapour treated
phase of solids
which is then further processed. The use of high temperatures to produce the
vapour treated
phase results in the denaturing of any protein component within the solid
phase. Furthermore,
the process described in this document results in a relatively low yield of
ethanol from biomass
(180-2501iters ethanol per metric ton dry material).
CA 02438984 2003-08-21
WO 02/070753 PCT/CA02/00244
-5-
The publication entitled Wet Milling of Grain for Alcohol Production by Lyons
et al., in Chapter 1 of The Alcohol Textbook 1995 (Nottingham University
Press)
discloses wet milling of corn in alcohol production. The corn kernel comprises
approximately 70% starch and contains little cellulose. After starch removal,
the
resulting corn fiber is high in cellulose. The reference teaches soaking clean
corn in tanks
for about 20 to 40 hours with steep water/acid containing about 1600 ppm SO2,
at a
temperature of about 52 C. This steeping is the first step in removing starch
from corn.
However, the reference does not teach the use of the corn fiber for the
production of
xylose or ethanol as described herein.
The publication entitled "Separation Processes" by C. Judson King (1980,
McGraw-Hill Book Company) discloses processing of sugar cane. Sugar cane is
primarily sugar, with little cellulose. The reference teaches washing sugar
cane with jets
of water to remove field debris, followed by chopping the sugar cane into
short sections,
passing the sections through high pressure rollers and adding water to remove
the
available sugar. The sugar solution is processed and refined into raw sugar,
black
molasses and other products. After sugar removal, the remaining cane pulp
(bagasse) is
high in cellulose content. There is no suggestion that the remaining bagasse
may be used
for xylose or ethanol production as outline herein.
Jenkins et al., (Measurements of the Fouling and Slagging Characteristics of
Banagrass (Pennisetum purpureum) Following Aqueous Extraction of Inorganic
Constituents. In: Making a Business from Biomass in Energy, Environment,
Chemicals,
Fibers and Materials. Proceedings of the 3rd Biomass Conference of the
Aniericas,
Montreal, Quebec, Canada, August 24-29. Pergamon (Elsevier Science)) discloses
the
washing of biomass fuel by aqueous extraction to control slagging and fouling
in
combustion systems burning banagrass. There is no suggestion that the washed
lignocellulosic biomass maybe used for xylose or ethanol production as
described herein.
Methods that improve xylose yield during acid hydrolysis improve the cost
efficiency of converting lignocellulosic feedstock to sugars. Furthermore,
methods that
CA 02438984 2003-08-21
WO 02/070753 PCT/CA02/00244
-6-
reduce the amount of acid required for dilute acid pretreatments increase the
cost
efficiency of ethanol production.
There is a need in the art to reduce the amount of acid which must be used in
a.
pretreatment process. Further, there is a need in the art to increase xylose
yield from
lignocellulosic feedstocks subjected to pretreatment processes.
It is an object of the present invention to overcome disadvantages of the
prior art.
The above object is met by a combination of the features of the main claims.
The
sub claims disclose further advantageous embodiments of the invention.
CA 02438984 2003-08-21
WO 02/070753 PCT/CA02/00244
-7-
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The invention relates to pretreatment processes for the conversion of
lignocellulosic feedstocks into sugars. More specifically, the present
invention relates to
pretreatment processes for the conversion of lignocellulosic feedstocks into
sugars and
the subsequent conversion of sugars to ethanol.
According to an embodiment of the present invention there is provided a method
of producing xylose from lignocellulosic feedstock comprising greater than
about 20%
(w/w) cellulose. The method comprises
a) leaching the lignocellulosic feedstock by contacting the feedstock with at
least
one aqueous solution for a period greater than about 2 minutes to produce a
leached
feedstock and a leachate;
b) removing the leachate from the leached feedstock; and
c) reacting the acidified feedstock under conditions which disrupt fiber
structure
and hydrolyze a portion of hemicellulose and cellulose of the acidified
feedstock, to
produce a composition comprising xylose and a pretreated feedstock.
The present invention relates to the above method, wherein following the step
of
removing (step b)), is a step of acidifying the leached feedstock to a pH
between about
0.5 and about 3 to produce an acidified feedstock.
The lignocellulosic feedstock may be selected from one or more of the
following
C4 grasses: switch grass, cord grass, rye grass, miscanthus, and a combination
thereof,
or sugar cane bagasse, soybean stover, corn stover, rice straw, rice hulls,
barley straw,
corn cobs, wheat straw, oat hulls, corn fiber, wood fiber, or a combination
thereof.
Preferably the lignocellulosic feedstock comprises an AX/NSP ratio of about
0.35 to
about 0.45, such as wheat straw, wheat chaff, switch grass, corn stover, corn
cobs, oat
hulls, or a combination thereof. The lignocellulosic feedstock may also
comprise
newsprint, cardboard, sawdust and combinations thereof. More preferably the
CA 02438984 2003-08-21
WO 02/070753 PCT/CA02/00244
-8-
lignocellulosic feedstock comprises oat hulls, wheat straw, switch grass, or a
combination
thereof.
Also according to the method of the present invention as defmed above, the
composition comprising xylose may comprise xylose polymer, xylose monomer or a
combination thereof. The composition may comprise other components such as
salts,
sugars and the like.
Further, according to the method of the present invention as defmed above, the
lignocellulosic feedstock preferably comprises mechanically disrupted
feedstock.
Preferably, the lignocellulosic feedstock is mechanically disrupted to pass
through 20
mesh, more preferably 40 mesh. Mechanical disruption maybe performed by
shredding,
milling, chopping, chipping, grinding or a combination thereof. Pireferably,
mechanical
disruption is performed by Hammer milling, Wiley milling, Szego milling or a
combination thereof.
Also according to the method of the present invention as defined above,
leaching
is performed for a period between about 2 minutes and about 2 hours, and at a
temperature between about 5 C and about 95 C. Preferably the leaching is
performed
at a temperature between about 20 C and about 80 C, and more preferably
between
about 60 C and about 80 C. Furthermore, the aqueous solution employed in
leaching
lignocellulosic feedstock comprises about 0.25 to about 10 times the maximum
water
holding capacity per kilogram of dry lignocellulosic feedstock. Leaching may
also
comprise a plurality of leaching stages. In embodiments of the method of the
present
invention wherein leaching comprises multiple leachings, preferably leaching
comprises
about 2 to about 4 leaching stages. Further, the leaching stages may be
performed in a
countercurrent fashion.
Also according to the method of the present invention as defined above, the
aqueous solution may comprise plant water, process water, fresh water or a
combination
thereof. Preferably the aqueous solution comprises a solution of pH about 3 to
about 9,
CA 02438984 2003-08-21
WO 02/070753 PCT/CA02/00244
-9-
and contains less than about 10 g/l of dissolved impurities. The pH may be
adjusted
using NaOH, HzS04 or a combination thereof.
Further, according to the method of the present invention as defined above,
leaching preferably removes between about 50% to about 100%, preferably 70% to
100%
of the total leachable buffering agents from the lignocellulosic feedstock.
The leachate
may be sampled during leaching, following leaching or both, and the leaching
parameters,
such as leaching time, or the number of leaching stages in a multistage
leaching may be
adjusted accordingly.
According to the present invention there is provided a composition produced by
the method of the present invention as defined above, wherein the composition
comprises
xylose and a pretreated feedstock. Preferably, the lignocellulosic feedstock
yields xylose
in the range of.about 150 mg to about 260 mg of xylose per gram of feedstock.
The
pretreated feedstock has increased accessibility to being digested during a
treatment with
cellulase enzyme. Further, the composition produced by the method of the
present
invention, the pretreated feedstock or both may be treated with cellulase
enzyme to
convert cellulose to glucose, and this treatment maybe followed by fermenting
glucose
to products such as, but not limited to ethanol, or lactic acid. Glucose may
also be
chemically hydrogenated to sorbitol or converted to other products such as
acetic acid,
citric acid, ascorbic acid, propanediol, butanediol, acetone, butanol, or a
combination
thereof.
Also according to the method of present invention as defined above, the
lignocellulosic feedstock preferably comprises cellulose in an amount greater
than about
20 %, more preferably greater than about 30%, still more preferably greater
than about
40% (w/w). The lignocellulosic feedstock may also comprise lignin in an amount
greater
than about 5%, more preferably. in an amount greater than about 10% (w/w). The
lignocellulosic feedstock may also comprise a combined amount of sucrose,
fructose and
starch in an amount less than about 20%, preferably less than about 10% (w/w).
The
CA 02438984 2003-08-21
WO 02/070753 PCT/CA02/00244
-10-
weight percentages disclosed above are relative to the mass of the
lignocellulosic
feedstock as it exists in its natural state, prior to any processing.
The present invention also provides a method of producing xylose from
lignocellulosic feedstock comprising,
a) leaching a mechanically disrupted lignocellulosic feedstock, the leaching
comprising contacting the feedstock with at least one aqueous solution for
a period of about 2 minutes to about 2 hours at a temperature of about
20 C to about 80 C using a volume of aqueous solution which is between
about 0.25 and about 10 times the maximum water holding capacity of the
disrupted lignocellulosic feedstock, to produce a leached feedstock and
a leachate;
b) removing the leachate from the leached feedstock;
c) acidifying the leached feedstock to a pH between about 0.5 and about 3
to produce an acidified feedstock, and;
d) reacting the acidified feedstock under conditions which disrupt fiber
=structure and hydrolyze a portion of hemicellulose and cellulose of the
acidified feedstock, to produce a compositiori comprising xylose and a
pretreated feedstock.
Also according to the present invention, there is provided a method of
producing
ethanol from a lignocellulosic feedstock comprising greater than about 20 %
(w/w)
cellulose, the method comprising,
a) leaching the lignocellulosic feedstock by contacting the feedstock with at
least one aqueous solution for a period greater than about 2 minutes to
produce a leached feedstock and a leachate;
b) removing the leachate from the leached feedstock;
c) acidifying the leached feedstock to a pH between about 0.5 and about 3
to produce an acidified feedstock, and;
d) reacting the acidified feedstock under conditions which disrupt fiber
structure and hydrolyze a portion of hemicellulose and cellulose of the
CA 02438984 2003-08-21
WO 02/070753 PCT/CA02/00244
-11-
acidified feedstock, to produce a composition comprising xylose and a
pretreated feedstock;
e) treating the composition comprising xylose and pretreated feedstock with
cellulase under conditions which hydrolyse cellulose in the pretreated
feedstock to glucose, producing a sugar solution comprising xylose and
glucose, and;
f) fermenting the sugar solution to ethanol.
Also according to the present invention, there is provided a method of
producing
ethanol from a lignocellulosic feedstock comprising greater than about 20
%(w/w)
cellulose, the method comprising,
a) leaching the lignocellulosic feedstock by contacting the feedstock with at
least one aqueous solution for a period greater than about 2 minutes to
produce a leached feedstock and a leachate;
b) removing the leachate from the leached feedstock;
c) acidifying the leached feedstock to a pH between about 0.5 and about 3
to produce an acidified feedstock, and;
d) reacting the acidified feedstock under conditions which disrupt fiber
structure and hydrolyze a portion of hemicellulose and cellulose of the
acidified feedstock, to produce a composition comprising xylose and a
pretreated feedstock, and;
e) treating the composition with a microrganism under conditions which
permit fermentation of the xylose in the composition to ethanol.
Also according to the present invention, there is provided a method of
producing
ethanol from a lignocellulosic feedstock comprising greater than about 20
%(w/w)
cellulose, the method comprising,
a) leaching the lignocellulosic feedstock by contacting the feedstock with at
least one aqueous solution for a period greater than about 2 minutes to
produce a leached feedstock and a leachate;
b) removing the leachate from the leached feedstock;
CA 02438984 2003-08-21
WO 02/070753 PCT/CA02/00244
-12-
c) acidifying the leached feedstock to a pH between about 0.5 and about 3
to produce an acidified feedstock, and;
d) reacting the acidified feedstock under conditions which disrupt fiber
structure and hydrolyze a portion of.hemicellulose and cellulose of the
acidified feedstock, to produce a composition comprising xylose and a
pretreated feedstock;
e) separating the pretreated feedstock from the composition;
f) treating the pretreated feedstock with cellulase under conditions which
hydrolyse cellulose in said pretreated feedstock to glucose, producing a
sugar solution comprising glucose, and;
g) fermenting the sugar solution to ethanol.
Thus, it is contemplated that xylose produced in the pretreatment of
lignocellulosic feedstock may be fermented in combination with glucose, or
separate
from glucose produced by cellulose hydrolysis of the pretreated feedstock.
The present invention also provides a method for preparing a lignocellulosic
feedstock comprising:
a) preconditioning the lignocellulosic feedstock to produce apreconditioned
feedstock;
b) incubating the preconditioned feedstock within a leaching bath to produce
a leached feedstock; and
c) crushing the leached feedstock to produce a pressate and a solid
feedstock.
In the method as described above, the step of preconditioning (step a)) may
comprise heating the lignocellulsic feedstock by steam to about 80 C for
about 1 minute,
and in the step of incubating (step b)), debris may be removed from the
leaching bath.
Furthermore, in the step of incubating (step b)), the preconditioned feedstock
may be
incubated from about 5 to about 30 minutes,.and wherein in the step of
crushing (step c)),
the pressate comprises soluble protein which is further processed for animal
feed.
CA 02438984 2003-08-21
WO 02/070753 PCT/CA02/00244
- 13-
The present invention also pertains to a lignocellulosic feedstock processing
system comprising, a feedstock handling device; a preconditioner capable of
receiving
the feedstock from the handling device, the preconditioner in communication
with a
steam source, the steam source for heating the feedstock, a first transfer
device, for
conveying the feedstock within, and from, the preconditioner to a leaching
bath, a second
transfer device for mixing the feedstock within the leaching bath and
conveying the
feedstock from the leaching bath to a press, a third transfer device for
conveying pressed
feedstock from the press to a second leach stage, and multi-press, to produce
processed
lignocellulosic feedstock.
Using the methods as described herein for the processing of biomass, high
yields
of ethanol can be obtained from about 300-340 liter ethanol per metric ton
biomass.
Another advantage of the method as described herein, over prior art methods
for the
preparation of lignocellulosic feedstock for xylose, ethanol, or both xylose
and ethanol
production, is that protein is recovered from the feedstock prior to any steam
and acid
treatments. These steam and acid treatments denature protein within the
feedstock, and
hydrolyse labile amino acids, for example but not limited to, lysine, that are
important for
high quality animal feeds. As the protein is recovered from the feedstock
processed
according to the present invention prior to denaturing process, the protein is
of a high
quality, and can be used for animal feed.
This summary does not necessarily describe all necessary features of the
invention
but that the invention may also reside in a sub-combination of the described
features.
CA 02438984 2003-08-21
WO 02/070753 PCT/CA02/00244
-14-
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
These and other features of the invention will become more apparent from the
following description in which reference is made to the appended drawings
wherein:
FIGURE 1 shows a graphical representation showing the amount of acid required
to
titrate water (dashed line) versus a leachate (solid line).
FIGURE 2 shows a graphical representation depicting the amount of acid
required to
titrate water (solid line), a slurry of lignocellulosic feedstock and water
(dashed
jine), and three leachates which are produced by leaching lignocellulosic
.feedstock for 10 minutes (filled squares), 1 hour (filled diamonds) and 24
hours
(filled triangles).
FIGURE 3 shows a graphical representation of the effect of leaching time on
the percent
alkalinity removal relative to a thoroughly leached feedstock.
FIGURE 4 shows a graphical representation showing the amount of acid required
to
titrate water (solid line), a leachate derived from leaching lignocellulosic
feedstock at 25 C (filled squares) and a leachate derived from leaching
lignocellulosic feedstock at 80 C (open squares).
FIGURE 5 shows a graphical representation depicting the amount of acid
required to
titrate water (solid line) and four leachates derived from leaching
lignocellulosic
feedstock using a mass ratio ofwater to dry lignocellulosic feedstock of about
3:1
(filled squares), 5:1 (filled diamonds), 7:1 (filled triangles), and 10:1
(filled
circles).
FIGURE 6 shows several aspects of the present invention. FIGURE 6(A) shows an
overview of an aspect of the present invention comprising a milling and
leaching
CA 02438984 2008-07-09
- 15 -
process. FIGURE 6(B) shows a schematic representation of an aspect of the
present
invention comprising a multistage, countercurrent leaching process.
FIGURE 7 shows a graphical representation depicting the amount of acid
required to titrate
unleached lignocellulosic feedstock (solid line), thoroughly leached
lignocellulosic
feedstock (dashed line), a leachate derived from a single leaching process
(filled
squares), a leachate derived from a two-stage leaching process (filled
diamonds), a
leachate derived from a 3 stage leaching process (filled triangles) and a
leachate
derived from a four stage leaching process (filled circles).
FIGURE 8 shows the release of xylose from a lignocellulosic feedstock in the
presence of
increasing acid concentration during pretreatment. FIGURE 8(A) shows a
graphical
representation depicting total xylose polymer plus monomer release from
lignocellulosic feedstock as a function of acid pretreatment load for an
unleached
lignocellulosic feedstock (closed squares), a lignocellulosic feedstock
treated by
leaching at room temperature (closed triangles), and a lignocellulosic
feedstock
treated by leaching at 80 C (closed diamonds). FIGURE 8(B) shows a graphical
representation depicting xylose monomer release from lignocellulosic feedstock
as a
function of acid pretreatment load for an unleached lignocellulosic feedstock
(open
squares), a lignocellulosic feedstock treated by leaching at room temperature
(open
triangles), and a lignocellulosic feedstock treated by leaching at 80 C (open
diamonds).
CA 02438984 2003-08-21
WO 02/070753 PCT/CA02/00244
-16-
DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
The invention relates to pretreatment processes for the conversion of
lignocellulosic feedstocks into sugars. More specifically, the present
invention relates to
pretreatment processes for the conversion of lignocellulosic feedstocks into
sugars and
the subsequent conversion of sugars to ethanol.
The following description is of a preferred embodiment by way of example only
and without limitation to the combination of features necessary for carrying
the invention
into effect.
According to an embodiment of the present invention there is provided a method
of producing xylose from lignocellulosic feedstock comprising:
a) leaching the lignocellulosic feedstock by contacting the feedstock with at
least
one aqueous solution for a period greater than about 2 minutes to produce
a leached feedstock and a leachate;
b) removing the leachate from the leached feedstock; and
c) pretreating the leached feedstock to produce a composition comprising
xylose,
pretreated feedstock, or both xylose and pretreated feedstock.
The composition comprising xylose and pretreated feedstock, or each of xylose
or the pretreated feedstock may be used for further processing to produce
product of
interest, for example but not limited to, ethanol, as described herein.
A non-limiting example of a method to pretreat the lignocellulosic feedstock,
as
identified in step c), above, is:
i) acidifying the leached feedstock to a pH between about 0.5 and about 3 to
produce an acidified feedstock, and;
ii) reacting the acidified feedstock under conditions which disrupt fiber
structure
and hydrolyze a portion of hemicellulose and cellulose of the acidified
CA 02438984 2008-07-09
- 17 -
feedstock, to produce a composition comprising xylose and a pretreated
feedstock.
However, any method within the art may be used as required for the preparation
of a
pretreated feedstock. Other examples include, but are not limited to, the
methods disclosed
in US 6,333,181; US 5,198,074; US 4,857,145; US 4,556,430; US 4,461,648; US
4,237,226;
US 5,536,325; US 5,846,787.
By the term "lignocellulosic feedstock" it is meant any type of plant biomass
such as
but not limited to non-woody plant biomass, cultivated crops such as, but not
limited to
grasses, for example but not limited to C4 grasses, such as switch grass, cord
grass, rye
grass, miscanthus, or a combination thereof, or sugar cane bagasse, soybean
stover, corn
stover, rice straw, rice hulls, barley straw, corn cobs, wheat straw, oat
hulls, corn fiber,
recycled wood pulp fiber, sawdust, hardwood, softwood or a combination
thereof. Further,
the lignocellulosic feedstock may comprise cellulosic waste material such as,
but not limited
to newsprint, cardboard, sawdust and the like. Lignocellulosic feedstock may
comprise one
species of fiber or alternatively, lignocellulosic feedstock may comprise a
mixture of fibers
that originate from different lignocellulosic feedstocks. Further, the
lignocellulosic
feedstock may comprise fresh lignocellulosic feedstock, partially dried
feedstock, fully dried
feedstock or a combination thereof. Preferably, the lignocellulosic feedstock
comprises fully
dried feedstock.
Preferably, the lignocellulosic feedstock comprises cellulose in an amount
greater
than about 20%, more preferably greater than about 30%, still more preferably
greater than
about 40% (w/w). The lignocellulosic feedstock may also comprise lignin in an
amount
greater than about 5%, more preferably in an amount greater than about 10%
(w/w). The
lignocellulosic feedstock may also comprise a combined amount of sucrose,
fructose and
starch in an amount less than about 20%, preferably less than about 10% (w/w).
The weight
percentages disclosed above are relative to the mass of the lignocellulosic
feedstock as it
exists in its natural state, prior to any processing.
CA 02438984 2008-07-09
- 18 -
It is preferred that the lignocellulosic feedstock comprise a mechanically
disrupted
feedstock. Mechanical disruption of lignocellulosic feedstock may be performed
according
to any method known in the art provided that the method is capable of reducing
the
lignocellulosic feedstock into particles of an adequate size. For example, but
not to be
considered limiting, mechanical disruption of straw preferably results in
pieces of straw
having a length less than about 0.5 inches and an average diameter less than
about 2 mm.
Preferably, mechanical disruption of lignocellulosic feedstock produces
particles which pass
through about 20 mesh, preferably 40 mesh. Without wishing to be limiting,
mechanical
disruption of lignocellulosic feedstock may be performed by chopping,
chipping, grinding,
milling, shredding or the like. Preferably, mechanical disruption is performed
by milling, for
example, but not limited to, Szego milling, Hammer milling or Wiley milling.
However, the
method of the present invention also contemplates the use of undisrupted
lignocellulosic
feedstock comprising a particle size which may pass through about 20 mesh,
preferably
about 40 mesh.
It is preferred that mechanical disruption of lignocellulosic feedstock is
performed on
feedstock that is substantially dry, that is, the lignocellulosic feedstock
comprises less than
about 40% moisture, preferably between about 0% and about 40% moisture. More
preferably from about 0% to about 10% moisture. However, the method of the
present
invention contemplates mechanical disruption of wet lignocellulosic feedstock
or concurrent
mechanical disruption and leaching of lignocellulosic feedstock. Furthermore,
wet or moist
lignocellulosic feedstock may also be dried prior effecting mechanical
disruption of the
feedstock.
In a preferred embodiment the lignocellulosic feedstock comprises a feedstock
with a
high AX/NSP ratio. AX/NSP is the ratio of arabinan plus xylan to non-starch
polysaccharides and can be measured for any feedstock based on the analytical
procedures
described in U.S. Patent No. 6,090,595. AX/NSP is calculated from EQUATION
(1):
CA 02438984 2003-08-21
WO 02/070753 PCT/CA02/00244
-19-
AX/NSP = (xylan + arabinan)/(xylan + arabinan + cellulose) (1)
wherein the xylan, arabinan, and cellulose contents of the feedstocks is
measured
according to the procedures in EXAMPLE 1. It is preferable that the
lignocellulosic
feedstocks employed in the method of the present invention exhibit an AX/NSP
ratio of
about 0.35 to about 0.45. Mixtures of lignocellulosic feedstocks which exhibit
an
average AX/NSP ratio of about 0.35 to about 0.45 may also be used. However, as
would
be evident to someone of skill in the art, a lignocellulosic feedstock or
mixture of
feedstocks which comprise an AX/NSP ratio or an average AX/NSP ratio outside
the
ranges defined above, may still be employed in the method of the present
invention.
By the term "leached feedstock" it is meant a lignocellulosic feedstock which
is
or has been in contact with an aqueous solution for a period greater than
about 2 minutes.
The aqueous solution which is, or has been in contact with the leached
feedstock for a
period greater than about 2 minutes is termed a "leachate". A leachate may
comprise
dissolved substances, such as, but not limited to buffering agents from the
lignocellulosic
feedstock. Further, the leachate may comprise undissolved substances, such as,
but not
limited to fine particles of the lignocellulosic feedstock.
By leaching the lignocellulosic feedstock the level of compounds that
interfere
with acid pretreatment are reduced. According to the method of the present
invention,
leaching comprises contacting lignocellulosic feedstock with an aqueous
solution for a
period between about 2 minutes and about 5 hours, preferably about 2 minutes
and about
2 hours, more preferably about 10 rriinutes and about 30 minutes. Leaching may
be
performed at a temperature between about 4 C and about 95 C, preferably
between
about 20 C and 80 C. In a preferred embodiment, leaching is performed at
about 60
C to about 80 C, more preferably at about 70 C. Alternatively, leaching may
be
performed at a temperature over about 100 C and under pressure.
Leaching can also recover protein from the feedstock, and this protein may be
useful as an animal feed. The choice of temperature for the leaching process
may
CA 02438984 2003-08-21
WO 02/070753 PCT/CA02/00244
-20-
therefore involve a balance between the higher leaching efficiency at high
temperatures
and the protein stability at lower temperature.
In a preferred embodiment, leaching reduces the amount of leachable buffering
agents in the lignocellulosic feedstock from about 50 % to about 100 %, more
preferably
about 70 % to about 100 %, relative to the total leachable buffering agents
contained in
the lignocelluloic feedstock prior to the leaching step. The total leachable
buffering
agents in a lignocellulosic feedstock may be estimated according to Example 3.
Preferably, the aqueous solution employed in leaching lignocellulosic
feedstock
comprises about 0.25 to about 10 times the maximum water holding capacity per
kilogram of dry lignocellulosic feedstock, more preferably about 1.5 to about
3 times the
maximum water holding capacity per kilogram of dry lignocellulosic feedstock.
However, leaching may be performed using an aqueous solution comprising more
than
about 10 times the maximum water holding capacity per kilogram of
lignocellulosic
feedstock. The maximum water holding capacity of a lignocellulosic feedstock
may be
determined by, for example, measuring the volume of water which may be
absorbed by
a known mass of loosely packed lignocellulosic feedstock until the point at
which
additional water added to the feedstock is free water. This point may be
estimated as the
point wherein water forms a thin continuous layer over the lignocellulosic
feedstock. In
determining the maximum water holding capacity of a feedstock, it is
preferable that the
lignocellulosic feedstock is mechanically disrupted into particles of about
the same size.
Further, as would be evident to a person skilled in the art, it is preferred
that the
maximum water holding capacity of a feedstock be determined on a loosely
packed and
not tightly packed lignocellulosic feedstock. The maximum water holding
capacity of a
lignocellulosic feedstock may be determined as described in Example 4.
The method of the present invention further contemplates continuous leaching
of
lignocellulosic feedstock. A continuous leaching process may employ a holding
tank
wherein a continuous feed of lignocellulosic feedstock and aqueous solution,
(forming
a slurry) is added to the holding tank and a continuous withdrawal of slurry
is made from
CA 02438984 2003-08-21
WO 02/070753 PCT/CA02/00244
-21-
the holding tank. The contact time, temperature, and mass ratio of aqueous
solution to
feedstock are similar to that described previously for batch leaching of
lignocellulosic
feedstock. A non-limiting example of a continuous leaching process is shown in
Figure
6(A) and involves a two-stage countercurrent washing process. The first stage
involves
preconditioning of the feedstock, and the second stage comprises leaching and
pressing
the feedstock.
In the continuous leaching process as shown in Figure 6(A), the milled
lignocellulosic feedstock (10) is conveyed to a preconditioner (20), which
consists of a
moving belt (25) onto which low pressure steam (30), for example at about less
than 15
psig, is sprayed to wet the fiber. The preconditioning heats the feedstock to
a temperature
of about 80 C over a period of about 1 minute, that being the time the
feedstock is on the
belt. Volatiles in the vapour phase are removed and collected in a condenser
(40).
After preconditioning, the feedstock is transferred to a leaching bath (50)
where
the feedstock remains submerged from about 5 to about 30 minutes,
preferablyabout 10
to about 20 minutes. The leaching bath is where the initial leaching (leach
stage 1) of the
preconditioned feedstock takes place. The leaching bath tank may also be
adapted for
removal of sand particles and other heavy debris that may settle to the bottom
of the tank.
Sand and other debris may be conveyed via conveyor (60) to a sand removal
press (70)
and discarded in a dumpster (80).
The contents of leach bath (50) are conveyed to a roll press (90) via conveyor
(55), and the feedstock crushed, to facilitate leaching and removal of liquid,
and soluble
components, for example but not limited to protein, salt, sugars and acids,
from the solid
phase. The pressate from the roll press comprising soluble protein, sugars and
salts, is
recovered in recovery line (100) and sent for further processing (110), for
example, but
not limited to protein concentration. The pressate, collected in line (150)
from a second
press housed within a second leach stage (130), may also be used to wash
incoming
feedstock in the first stage of the leach, for example at (90). The crushed
fiber from the
roll press (90) may be wetted with recycle leachate (120) from a second leach
stage (130),
CA 02438984 2008-07-09
- 22 -
and fed to a second press within (130), for example but not limited to a multi-
press, via
conveyor (152). The second leach stage (130), involves washing the solids with
wash
stream (140) and then pressing the washed solids to separate the solids from
the liquid. The
leached solids exit the second leach stage (130) at port (160) and are then
sent for further
processing as required using any process as known within the art, for example
but not
limited to:
= ethanol production as disclosed in US 6,333,181 and US 5,198,074;
= paper production as disclosed in US 5,198,074 and US 4,857,145;
= biomass hydrolysis US 4,556,430, US 4,461,648 and US 5,846,787;
= sugar production as disclosed in US 4,237,226 and US 5,536,325.
As would be evident to someone of skill in the art, lignocellulosic feedstock
may be
agitated during leaching, for example, but not wishing to be limiting by
stirring or the like.
Agitation may also occur through movement of the conveyor (55) in leach tank
50
Alternatively, leaching may be performed without agitation of the
lignocellulosic feedstock.
Therefore, the present invention also provides a lignocellulosic feedstock
processing
system comprising, a feedstock handling device; a preconditioner capable of
receiving the
feedstock from the handling device, the preconditioner in communication with a
steam
source, the steam source for heating the feedstock, a first transfer device,
for conveying the
feedstock within, and from, the preconditioner to a leaching bath, a second
transfer device
for mixing the feedstock within the leaching bath and conveying the feedstock
from the
leaching bath to a press, a third transfer device for conveying pressed
feedstock from the
press to a second leach stage, and multi-press, to produce processed
lignocellulosic
feedstock.
The aqueous solution employed in the method of the present invention may
comprise, but is not limited to plant water, process water, fresh water or a
combination
thereof. However, it is generally preferred that the aqueous solution used in
the leaching
CA 02438984 2003-08-21
WO 02/070753 PCT/CA02/00244
-23-
of the method of the present invention comprise an aqueous solution of pH
about 3 to
about 9, preferably from about pH 6 to about 7, and contain less than about 10
g/L of
dissolved impurities. The pH of the aqueous solution may be adjusted using any
sutaible
acid or base, preferably, NaOH or HZSO4 An alkaline aqueous solution may be
used to
help in protein extraction as outlined above.
It is also contemplated by the method of the present invention that leaching
may
be performed in a plurality of stages. For example, but not wishing to be
limiting,
leaching may comprise from about two to about four leaching stages wherein in
each
stage the lignocellulosic feedstock is contacted with an aqueous solution
under the
conditions as defined above (e.g. see Figure 6(B)). Following each leaching
stage, the
lignocellulosic feedstock is removed from the aqueous solution as discussed
below.
The step of removing the leachate from the leached feedstock may be performed
according to any process known in the art. For example, but not wishing to be
limiting,
the leachate may be removed from the leached feedstock by draining, pressing,
filtering,
screening, centrifuging or a combination thereof. Alternatively, but without
wishing to
be limiting, the leachate may be removed from the leached feedstock by rinsing
or
washing the leached feedstock using a washer.
As would be evident to someone of skill in the art, the step of removing the
leachate from the leached feedstock need not result in complete removal of all
aqueous
solution from the leached feedstock. However, it is preferred that between
about 20% and
about 100%, preferably about 50% and about 100% of the leachate be removed
from the
leached feedstock.
The leachate produced in the method of the present invention may be used in
processes related to or unrelated to ethanol production. Alternatively, the
leachate may
be discarded. Further, the leachate may be examined during or after leaching
of
lignocellulosic feedstock to determine the quantity of soluble components and
contaminants removed from the lignocellulosic feedstock. The soluble
components may
CA 02438984 2008-07-09
- 24 -
include, but are not limited to buffering agents and the like. Therefore, the
method of the
present invention further contemplates sampling the leachate during leaching,
after leaching
or both before and after leaching to determine the extent of leaching of the
lignocellulosic
feedstock. Thus, it is possible to optimize leaching parameters such as, but
not limited to,
the leaching times of a lignocellulosic feedstock, or the number of leaching
stages required
for a lignocellulosic feedstock. Further, it is possible to monitor the extent
of leaching when
practising the method of the present invention.
Following the step of removing the leachate from the leached feedstock, the
feedstock may be processed using any desired method for the production of
ethanol.
Non-limiting examples of such methods include those described in US 6,333,181;
US 5,198,074; US 4,857,145; US 4,556,430; US 4,461,648; US 4,237,266, US
5,221,537,
US 5,536,325; US 5,628,830; US 5,846,787.
A preferred method to further process the leached feedstock comprises the step
of
acidifying the leached feedstock to a pH between about 0.5 and about 8,
preferably, a pH of
about 0.5 to about 3 to produce an acidified feedstock. The leached feedstock
may be
acidified using any acid known in the art, but is preferably acidified using
sulfuric acid,
nitric acid or hydrochloric acid. In a preferred embodiment the acid is
sulfuric acid.
Reacting acidified feedstock under conditions which disrupt fiber structure as
contemplated in the method of the present invention, maybe performed according
to any
method known in the art, for example, but not limited to pretreatment by steam
explosion as
described in U.S. Pat No. 4,461,648, and U.S. Pat No. 4,237,226. Further, any
parameters
used in the prior art to effect steam explosion pretreatments, such as, but
not limited to those
described in Foody, et al, Final Report, Optimization of Steam Explosion
Pretreatment, U.S.
Department of Energy Report ET230501 (April 1980) may be used in the method of
the
present invention.
CA 02438984 2003-08-21
WO 02/070753 PCT/CA02/00244
-25-
Preferably, the step of reacting the acidified feedstock is performed using a
temperature between about 100 C to about 220 C at about pH 0.5 to about 2.5
for about
seconds to about 60 minutes. It is understood by those skilled in the art that
the
feedstock temperature is that of the feedstock itself, which might differ from
the
5 temperature measured outside the reaction chamber. Devices used to carry out
this
pretreatment include, but are not limited to sealed batch reactors, continuous
extruders
and steam guns.
It is also within the scope of the present invention that a two-stage
pretreatment
process may be used, whereby the first stage improves the cellulose hydrolysis
somewhat
while solubilizing primarily the hemicellulose but little cellulose. The
second stage then
completes a full pretreatment. In this embodiment, the first stage reaction is
run at a
temperature of less than about 180 C while the second stage reaction is run
at a
temperature of greater than about 180 C. Preferably, the first stage of the
reaction is
carried out at a temperature of about 60 C to about 140 C for 0.25 to 24
hours at pH 0.5
to 2.5 . More preferably, the first stage of pretreatment is carried out at a
temperature of
100 C to 130 C for 0.5 to 3 hours at pH 0.5 to 2.5. While the second stage
of reaction
may be carried out at a temperature of 180 C to 270 C, at pH 0.5 to 2.5 for
a period
of 5 seconds to 120 seconds. The two-stage pretreatment provides separate
recovery of
the hemicellulose for downstream processing.
Reacting the acidified feedstock as contemplated by the method of the present
invention, produces a composition comprising xylose and a pretreated
feedstock.
Preferably, as a result of the methods as described herein, the composition
comprises
between about 150 to about 260 mg of xylose per gram of dry lignocellulosic
feedstock.
As will be evident to someone of skill in the art, the composition may
comprise sugars
other than xylose and a variety of other components. The xylose may be
purified from the
composition.
The composition or pretreated feedstock derived from practising the method of
the present invention may be treated with cellulase enzymes to hydrolyse
cellulose to
CA 02438984 2008-07-09
- 26 -
glucose using methods as would be known to one of skill in the art. A
cellulase enzyme
treatment may be performed by mixing the pretreated feedstock or composition
derived from
the method of the present invention with water and titrating the mixture to a
pH of about 5 to
achieve a slurry of 5% to 10% by weight cellulose. Cellulase enzymes are then
added to the
mixture. Typically, the hydrolysis is run for about 24 to about 200 hours at
about 50 C. At
the end of the hydrolysis, glucose and other water soluble sugars remain
dissolved in
solution, while unconverted cellulose, lignin, and other insoluble portions of
the substrate
remain in suspension or precipitate from solution. A syrup comprising glucose
and other
dissolved sugars and solutes may be recovered by filtering the hydrolysis
slurry. Washing of
the fiber solids may also be performed to increase the yield of glucose and
other sugars.
It is also contemplated that glucose produced by the hydrolysis of cellulose
from the
pretreated feedstock maybe fermented to ethanol. Fermentation of glucose and
other sugars
to ethanol maybe performed by conventional processes known to those skilled in
the art, and
may be effected by a variety of microorganisms including yeast and bacteria or
genetically
modified microorganisms, for example, but not limited those described in WO
95/13362,
WO 97/42307 and the article entitled Alcohol production from Cellulosic
Biomass: The
logen Process in: The Alcohol Textbook. (2000, Nottingham University Press).
It is also contemplated that both glucose and xylose produced in the method of
the
present of the present invention may be fermented to ethanol. Alternatively,
xylose and
glucose may be fermented to ethanol independently. Ethanol production and
recovery are
performed by well-established processes used in the alcohol industry.
Thus, the present invention, provides a method of producing ethanol from a
lignocellulosic feedstock comprising,
a) leaching the lignocellulosic feedstock by contacting the feedstock with at
least one aqueous solution for a period greater than about 2 minutes to
produce a leached feedstock and a leachate;
CA 02438984 2003-08-21
WO 02/070753 PCT/CA02/00244
- 27 -
b) removing the leachate from the leached feedstock;
c) acidifying the leached feedstock to a pH between about 0.5 and about 3
to produce an acidified feedstock, and;
d) reacting the acidified feedstock under conditions which disrupt fiber
structure and hydrolyze a portion of hemicellulose and cellulose of the
acidified feedstock, to produce a composition comprising xylose and a
pretreated feedstock;
e) treating the composition comprising xylose and pretreated feedstock with
cellulase under conditions which hydrolyse cellulose in the pretreated
feedstock to glucose, producing a sugar solution comprising xylose and
glucose, and;
f) either:
i) fermenting the sugar solution to ethanol;
ii) treating the composition with a microrganism under conditions which
permit fermentation of the xylose in the composition to ethanol; or
iii) separating the pretreated feedstock form the composition, and treating
the pretreated feedstock with cellulase under conditions which hydrolyse
cellulose in the pretreated f.eedstock to glucose, producing a sugar
solution comprising glucose, and fermenting the sugar solution to ethanol.
Thus, it is contemplated that xylose produced in the pretreatment of
lignocellulosic
feedstock may be fermented in combination with glucose, or separate from
glucose
produced by cellulose hydrolysis of the pretreated feedstock.
It is also contemplated that the glucose may be fermented to lactic acid or
converted to other useful products such as, but not limited to sorbitol,
acetic acid, citric
acid, ascorbic acid, propanediol, butanediol, acetone, butanol, or a
combination thereof.
Leaching of lignocellulosic feedstock as performed in the method of the
present
invention reduces the amount of acid required in a hydrolysis process compared
to.
lignocellulosic feedstock which has not been subjected to leaching. Referring
now to
CA 02438984 2003-08-21
WO 02/070753 PCT/CA02/00244
-28-
Figure 1, there is shown the amount of acid required to titrate water to a
desired pH
(dashed line) relative to the amount of acid required to titrate a leachate
solution (solid
line) comprising an aqueous solution which has been in contact with a
lignocellulosic
feedstock according to the method of the present invention. The data from
Figure 1
indicate that lignocellosic feedstocks comprise buffering agents may be
removed from
the feedstock by leaching with aqueous solution. Removing all or a portion of
the
buffering agents from a lignocellulosic feedstock reduces the amount of acid
that must
be used in a dilute acid prehydrolysis process such as, but not limited to
steam explosion.
Referring now to Figure 2, there is shown the amount of acid required to
titrate
water, an unleached lignocellulosic feedstock slurry, or three leachates which
have been
used to contact three lignocellulosic feedstocks for a period of 10 minutes, 1
hour or 24
hours, respectively. The results shown in Figure 2 suggest that leaching
lignocellulosic
feedstock for a period between about 10 minutes and about 24 hours is capable
of
removing buffering agents from the feedstock so as to reduce the amount of
acid required
to titrate the pH of the leached lignocellulosic feedstock.
Referring now to Figure 3, there is shown the percent alkalinity removal as a
function of leaching time for a lignocellulosic feedstock relative to a
thoroughly leached
feedstock prepared according to Example 4. The results shown in Figure 3
suggest that
a leaching time of about 2 minutes is capable of leaching about 48 % of the
total
leachable buffering agents from the lignocellulosic feedstock and a time of
about 60
minutes leaches about 85% of the total leachable buffering agents.
Referring now to Figure 4 there is shown the effect of temperature on leaching
of lignocellulosic feedstock. These data indicate that leaching of
lignocellulosic feedstock
may be performed under a wide range of temperatures. Specifically,
lignocellulosic
feedstock treated by leaching at temperatures between about 25 C and about 80
C
produce leachates comprising buffering agents. Removal of buffering agents
from
lignocellulosic feedstocks during leaching produces leached feedstock which
requires less
acid load to titrate the feedstock to an acidic pH suitable for dilute acid
prehydrolysis
CA 02438984 2003-08-21
WO 02/070753 PCT/CA02/00244
-29-
processes such as, but not limited to, steam explosion. While the results
shown in Figure
4 suggest that leaching temperatures of between about 25 C and about 800 C
may be used
in the method of the present invention, other temperatures outside this range
may also be
used in the method of the present invention.
Referring now to Figure 5, there is shown the amount of acid required to
titrate
leachates, wherein the mass ratio of aqueous solution (leachate) to dry
lignocellulosic
feedstock to is about 3:1, 5:1, 7:1 and 10:1. The results depicted in Figure 5
are corrected
for volume and suggest that a wide range of leachate to feedstock ratios may
remove
similar amounts of buffer agents from lignocellulosic feedstocks. The minimum
ratio of
aqueous solution to lignocellulosic feedstock corresponds to an amount about
equal to
or greater than the maximum water holding capacity of the feedstock.
The results depicted in Figures 1-5 are based on a single leaching of
lignocellulosic feedstock. However, the method of the present invention also
contemplates multiple leachings of lignocellulosic feedstock. For example, but
not to be
considered limiting, lignocellulosic feedstock may be subjected to multiple
leaching
stages, wherein after each leaching, the leachate is removed from the leached
feedstock
as described previously herein. In embodiments of the method of the present
invention
wherein multiple leachings of the lignocellulosic material are performed,
preferably the
method comprises between about 2 and about 4 leachings of the lignocellulosic
feedstock. Without wishing to be bound by theory, multiple leachings may allow
the
volume of aqueous solution per mass of lignocellulosic feedstock to be reduced
in
practising the method of the present invention.
The method of the present invention further contemplates multiple leachings of
lignocellulosic feedstock wherein the multiple leachings are performed in a
countercurrent fashion. Referring now to Figure 6, there is shown a 1-4 stage
countercurrent leaching process which may be employed in the method of the
present
invention. Figure 6 is provided as an example and is not intended to be
limiting in any
manner. As shown in Figure 6, a first lignocellulosic feedstock is leached
with water in
a first leaching stage to produce a first leachate and a first leached
feedstock. Following
CA 02438984 2003-08-21
WO 02/070753 PCT/CA02/00244
-30-
the appropriate leaching time, the first leachate is separated from the first
leached
feedstock. This represents a one stage leaching of lignocellulosic feedstock.
As further shown in Figure 6, the first leachate or an aliquot thereof may be
used
to leach a second lignocellulosic feedstock thereby producing a second
leachate and a
second leached feedstock. The second leachate, or an aliquot thereof, may be
used to
leach a third lignocellulosic feedstock. Also shown in Figure 6, the second
leached
feedstock is further leached with water in a second leaching stage. The
leachate produced
in this second leaching maybe used to leach a further lignocellulosic
feedstock which has
been previously leached or unleached. The entire process maybe repeated for
any number
of stages. However, in embodiments of the present invention which employ
multiple
leachings of lignocellulosic feedstock, it is preferred that 2 to 4 leaching
stages are used.
Further, although Figure 6 represents a countercurrerit leaching process,
wherein a
leachate from a first leaching is employed in the leaching of a second
lignocellulosic
feedstock, it is also contemplated that each leaching may be performed with an
aqueous
solution that was not previously used to leach lignocellulosic feedstock.
In embodiments of.the method of the present invention wherein multiple
leachings of lignocellulosic feedstock are performed in a countercurrent
manner, it is
preferred that a subsequent leaching of a lignocellulosic feedstock employ an
aqueous
solution containing less impurities than a previous leaching of the same
lignocellulosic
feedstock, as would be known to someone of skill in the art. More preferably,
the last
leaching of a multiple leaching process comprises substantially pure water,
that is water
that has not been previously used to leach a feedstock.
Referring now to Figure 7, there is shown the amount of acid required to
titrate
an unleached lignocellulosic feedstock, four leached lignocellulosic
feedstocks
comprising between 1 and 4 leachings and a thoroughly leached lignocellulosic
feedstock
The results shown in Figure 7 suggest that multiple leachings of
lignocellulosic feedstock
may be used to remove buffering agents from the feedstock thereby reducing the
acid
load required for dilute acid prehydrolysis processes, for example, but not
limited to
steam explosion. Thus, the method of the present invention contemplates
multiple
CA 02438984 2003-08-21
WO 02/070753 PCT/CA02/00244
-31-
leachings of lignocellulosic feedstock. In a preferred embodiment, the present
invention
contemplates from about 1 to about 5 leachings of lignocellulosic feedstock
wherein the
volume of aqueous solution is about 3 to about 10 times the volume of the
maximum
water holding capacity per kilogram of the lignocellulosic feedstock, more
preferably
about 7 times the maximum water holding capacity of the lignocellulosic
feedstock.
The results depicted in Figures 1-7 suggest that leaching of lignocellulosic
feedstock may reduce the amount of acid required to titrate the pH of the
leached
feedstock to a value suitable for a dilute-acid hydrolysis. Thus, the present
invention
further contemplates a method of reducing the amount of acid required to
effect dilute
acid hydrolysis treatment of lignocellulosic feedstock. Further, leaching
oflignocellulosic
feedstock may be used to reduce the amount of acid required in other processes
such as,
but not limited to those processes employing acid to depolymerize cellulose to
glucose.
Thus, the present invention contemplates a method of reducing the amount of
acid
required to effect acid depolymerization of cellulose to glucose.
Leaching of lignocellulosic feedstock is capable of removing buffering agents
from the feedstock. Thus, leaching lignocellulosic feedstock may be employed
to reduce
the amount of base required to titrate the pH of the lignocelluloic feedstock
to an
appropriate pH for other processes, such as but not limited to ammonia
pretreatment of
lignocellulosic feedstock. The present invention contemplates a method of
reducing the
amount of base required to effect an ammonia pretreatment of lignocellulosic
feedstock.
Xylose Production
A drawback of dilute acid prehydrolysis processes known in the art is that
these
processes destroy xylose during treatment. The destruction of xylose during
dilute acid
prehydrolysis reduces the ethanol yield that may be obtained from the
feedstock.
Referring now to Figure 8 (A), there is shown the amount of xylose polymer
released from lignocellulosic feedstock as a functioin of acid load in a
dilute-acid
pretreatment process. As shown in Figure 8 (A), leaching of lignocellulosic
feedstock
CA 02438984 2003-08-21
WO 02/070753 PCT/CA02/00244
-32-
prior to dilute acid pretreatment results in a higher amount of xylose polymer
release
from lignocellulosic feedstock than does unleached lignocellulosic feedstock
treated in
an identical manner. Furthermore, the amount of xylose released from
pretreated
feedstock is greater than the unleached feedstock for any given amounts of
acid used
during pretreatment, and the amount of acid required to effect xylose release
is much less
than that of the unleached feedstock.
Referring now to Figure 8 (B), there is shown the amount of xylose monomer
released from lignocellulosic feedstock as a function of acid load in a dilute-
acid
pretreatment process. As shown in Figure 8 (B), leaching of lignocellulosic
feedstock
prior to dilute acid pretreatment results in a higher amount of xylose monomer
release
from lignocellulosic feedstock than does unleached lignocellulosic feedstock
treated in
an identical manner. Again, the amount of xylose released from pretreated
feedstock is
greater than the unleached feedstock for any given amount of acid used during
pretreatment. The amount of acid required to effect xylose release is also
much less than
that of the unleached feedstock.
Therefore, the method of the present invention increases the amount of xylose
released from lignocellulosic feedstocks following dilute acid prehydrolysis
processes
and increases ethanol yield when the same feedstock is treated with
microorganisms,
cellulase enzyme, or both, and subsequently fermented to ethanol.
The above description is not intended to limit the claimed invention in any
manner, Furthermore, the discussed combination of features might not be
absolutely
necessary for the inventive solution.
The present invention will be further illustrated in the following examples.
However, it is to be understood that these examples are for illustrative
purposed only, and
should not be used to limit the scope of the present invention in any manner.
Examples
CA 02438984 2008-07-09
- 33 -
EXAMPLE 1: Measurement of Aac/Nsp in Feedstocks
The ratio of arabinan plus xylan to total non-starch polysaccharides of a
given
feedstock is determined based on a compositional analysis of the feedstocks.
This analysis is
performed, as follows:
Feedstocks examined include barley straw, wheat straw, wheat chaff, oat hulls,
switch grass, corn stover, maple wood, pine wood, and three varieties of corn
cobs. All are
obtained locally in Ottawa, Ontario except the oat hulls, which are from
Quaker Oats* in
Peterborough, Ontario. The feedstocks are coarsely ground in a Waring blender
and then
milled through a #20 mesh screen using a Wiley mill. The feedstocks are stored
at ambient
temperature in sealed bags until the time of use. The moisture content of
small samples is
5% to 10% and is determined by drying at 100 C.
Approximately 0.2 grams of sample is weighed into test tubes, each containing
2.5 ml of 72% sulfuric acid. The tubes are vortex mixed, capped, and placed in
a 40 C
water bath for 30 minutes, with vigorous vortex mixing every 10 minutes. After
the
30 minute incubation, the tube contents are transferred into preweighed 250 ml
flasks
containing 97.5 ml deionized water, which reduced the acid content to 1.8%.
Each flask is
transferred to a steam autoclave and is maintained at 121 C for 1 hour. The
flask is weighed
after autoclaving.
The concentrations of glucose, xylose, and arabinose present in the filtrates
are
measured by using a Dionex Pulse-Amperometric HPLC. These measurements are
then
related to the weight of the initial sample of feedstock present and expressed
as glucan,
xylan, and arabinan contents, respectively, of the feedstock, with small
adjustments to take
into account (1) the water of hydration to make the monomers from polymers and
(2) the
amount of material destroyed by the concentrated acid, which is measured by
taking pure
cellulose, xylose, and arabinose controls through the procedure. The
determination is
performed in triplicate and the average value is reported.
* Trademark
CA 02438984 2003-08-21
WO 02/070753 PCT/CA02/00244
-34-
The cellulose content is determined by subtracting the starch content from the
total glucan. The starch content is determined by adding 1 gram of Wiley-
milled
feedstock to a 250 ml flask containing 20 ml of deionized water, 0.2 ml of
91.7 g/L
CaC12-2HZO stock solution, and 50 microliters of a 1:100 solution of Sigma
Alpha
Amylase #A3403 in deionized water. Each flask is adjusted to pH 6.4 to 6.6
using dilute
sodium hydroxide, then incubated in a boiling water bath for one hour. The
flasks are
incubated for 30 minutes in a steam autoclave at 121 C after the addition of
a second 50
l dose of amylase. Finally, the flask is incubated for another 60 minutes in
the boiling
water bath with a third 50 l dose of amylase. The flasks are then cooled to
ambient
temperature and adjusted to pH 4.2 to 4.4 using dilute hydrochloric acid. A
0.5 ml
aliquot of Novo Spritamylase stock solution is added; the stock solution
consisted of 3
grams of enzyme solution in 100 ml deionized water. The flasks are shaken at
50 C for
hours with 150 RPM agitation. The flasks are then cooled and the contents are
filtered
over glass microfiber filter paper. The glucose concentration is then measured
on a
15 Yellow Springs Instrument (YSI) glucose analyzer and used to determine the
starch
concentration of the feedstock, taking into account the water necessary to
hydrolyse the
starch.
The protein and ash content of the feedstocks are determined by standard Kj
eldahl
20 nitrogen and ash oven methods.
The lignin content of the samples is determined by measuring the amount of
insoluble solids remaining after the sulfuric acid treatment of the
feedstocks, then
subtracting the amount of ash present.
The results of these measurements are shown in TABLE 1. The material
recovered is between 849 and 1018 mg per gram of original solids (mg/g). This
corresponds.to 84.9%, by weight, to 101.8% of the starting material, which is
typical
mass balance closure in these systems.
TABLE 1: COMPOSITION OF THE FEEDSTOCKS
CA 02438984 2003-08-21
WO 02/070753 PCT/CA02/00244
-35-
Measured composition (mg/g)
Feedstock Glucan Starch Xylan Arabinan Lignin Ash Protein Total
Barley 426 19.6 161 28 168 82 64 929
Straw
Wheat 349 12 167 18 204 83 64 885
Straw
Wheat chaff 405 14.4 200 36 160 121 33 955
Switch grass 331 3.4 212 24 183 48 54 852
Corn stover 370 2.3 189 22 127 60 81 849
Ma le wood *504 4 150 5 276 6 6 947
Pine wood 649 1 33 14 320 0 2 1018
Corn cobs 436 34 253 38 ND (2) ND ND ND
(red)
Corn cobs 439 28 250 38 ND ND ND ND
(white)
Corn cobs 438 8.5 240 36 ND ND ND ND
Indian20 Oat Hulls 436 90 187 26 170 44 38 901
Soybean 377 ND 120 13 ND ND ND ND
Stover
(1) Total = Glucan + Xylan + Arabinan + Lignin+ Ash + Protein
(2) ND = Not determined
CA 02438984 2003-08-21
WO 02/070753 PCT/CA02/00244
-36-
The AX/NSP content of the feedstocks is shown in TABLE 2. Of the 12
feedstocks analyzed, eight have AX/NSP of greater than about 0.35. These
include the
samples of wheat straw, wheat chaff, switch grass, corn stover, oat hulls and
corn.
TABLE 2: AX/NSP COMPOSITION OF THE FEEDSTOCKS
Feed-stock Cellulose AX (mg/g) (2) NSP (mg/g) (3) AX/NSP
(mg/g) (1)
Barley Straw 407 189 596 0.317
337 185 522 0.354
Wheat Straw
Wheat chaff 391 236 627 0.376
Switch grass 328 236 564 0.418
Corn stover 347 211 558 0.378
Maple wood 500 155 655 0.237
Pine wood 648 47 695 0.068
Corn cobs 402 291 693 0.42
(red)
Corn cobs 411 288 699 0.412
(white)
Corn cobs 429 276 705 0.391
(Indian)
Oat Hulls 346 213 559 0.381
Soybean 377 133 510 0.26
Stover
(1) Cellulose = Glucan - Starch
(2) AX = Xylan + Arabinan
(3) NSP = Xylan + Arabinan+Cellulose
CA 02438984 2003-08-21
WO 02/070753 PCT/CA02/00244
-37-
EXAMPLE 2:Leaching and Dilute Acid Pretreatment of Lignocellulosic Feedstock
A. Leaching
Wheat straw is ground using a Wiley mill to produce particles of a size less
than 20 mesh.
The milled lignocellulosic feedstock is added to water at 25 C or 80 C for
leaching. For
comparative purposes an equivalent amount of Wiley milled straw is set aside
as a
control and processed without leaching. Leaching of the lignocellulosic
feedstock.is
performed for 60 minutes using a mass ratio of water to lignocellulosic
feedstock of 10:1.
Following leaching, the leached lignocellulosic material is filtered and
pressed to 50%
solids content.
B. Dilute Acid Hydrolysis of Leached Feedstock
The leached lignocellulosic material (1.0 grams, total fiber) is placed in a
10 mL stainless
steel reactor. A volume of 5 % sulfuric acid is added to the leached feedstock
to obtain
a ratio of acid to leached feedstock in the range of 0.5% to 6.3 %
weight/weight. The
reactor is sealed and placed in a 200 C oil bath for 2 minutes. Following the
5 minute
incubation the reactor is placed in cold water to quench the reaction.
C. Determination of Xylose Concentration
The xylose concentration of the treated feedstock is measured by filtering an
aliquot and
hydrolysing the sample at 120 C with 2 % sulfuric acid. The xylose
concentration of the
hydrolysate is measured by HPLC and is expressed in milligrams of xylose per
gram of
lignocellulosic feedstock.
The results obtained for xylose release from lignocellulosic feedstock treated
according
to the method of the present invention are shown in Figures 8A and 8B.The
highest
xylose yield obtained with 25 C leaching was about 170 mg/g, representing an
improvement of about 20 % over lignocellulosic biomass that is not subjected
to leaching
prior to pretreatment. An acid load of about 4.5 % on the feedstock is
required to reach
this yield. An acid load of about 2.5 % is required to produce 140 mg/g xylose
according
CA 02438984 2003-08-21
WO 02/070753 PCT/CA02/00244
-38-
to the method of the present invention. Without leaching, a similar process
requires about
6.5 % acid load performed under the conditions described above.
D. LeachingTime
Experiments in which leaching time is varied are performed in a similar manner
as those
described above, except that the leaching times are 2 minutes, 10 minutes,1
hour and 24
hours. The results of varying the leaching time are shown in Figures 2 and 3.
E. Leaching Temperature
Experiments in which the leach temperature is varied are performed in a
similar manner
as those described above, except that the leaching temperatures are 259 C and
80 C. The
results of varying the leaching temperature are shown in Figure 4.
F. Ratio of Liznocellulosic Feedstock to Water Ratio
Experiments in which the mass ratio of water (leachate) to lignocellulosic
feedstock
(leachate) is varied are performed in a similar manner as those described
above, except
that the mass ratio of water to lignocellulosic feedstock to water is 3:1,
5:1, 7:1 and 10:1.
The results of these leachings are shown in Figure 5
G. Multiple LeachingStages
The leaching stage is performed in a similar manner with a mass ratio of water
to
lignocellulosic feedstock of about 5:1. Leaching is performed for 10 minutes
at 25 C,
followed by pressing the leached lignocellulosic feedstock to 50 % solids
(mass ratio of
water to feedstock of about 0.5:1. Additional leaching stages are repeated as
previously
described. The results of 0-4 leaching stages are shown in Figure 7.
EXAMPLE 3: Preparation of a Thoroughly Leached Feedstock.
25 grams of lignocellulosic feedstock is milled to a particle size capable of
passing
through 20 mesh. Leaching of the lignocellulosic feedstock is performed by
combining
the lignocellulosic feedstock with 10 times the volume of its maximum water
carrying
CA 02438984 2003-08-21
WO 02/070753 PCT/CA02/00244
-39-
capacity and the slurry is stirred at 25 C for 24 hours. After the incubation
period, the
leachate is removed from the leached feedstock and the feedstock is rinsed
with about 2L
of a water and pressed to a solids conteint of about 50%. The pressed, leached
feedstock
is a thoroughly leached feedstock.
The total leachable buffering agents of the feedstock is determined by
titrating the
leachate plus rinse water to pH 3 with 0.1N: H2SO4. The volume of titrant used
is
expressed as kg H2S04 per tonne of dry lignocellulosic feedstock. This is a
measure of
the total leachable buffering agents of the feedstock.
EXAMPLE 4: Maximum Water Holding Capacity of Feedstock
A sample of about 25 grams of lignocellulosic feedstock with known dry weight
and
moisture content is mechanically disrupted into particles of about equal size
and that pass
through 20 mesh. The lignocellulosic feedstock is sifted into a container,
allowing the
feedstock to pack under the influence of gravity. Water is added gradually to
a known
mass of feedstock in a test tube until the point at which additional water
added is free
water. This point is estimated as the point wherein water forms a thin
continuous layer
over the lignocellulosic feedstock. The test tube is tipped to remove free
water. The wet
feedstock is then weighed to determine the amount of water and feedstock
present. The
mass of water in the particles at this point is the maximum water holding
capacity of the
lignocellulosic feedstock for that particular amount and type of feedstock.
The maximum
water holding capacity per mass of lignocellulosic feedstock may be measured
by
dividing the mass of water required to reach the point wherein the addition of
further
water results in free water over the lignocellulosic feedstock, by the mass of
the
lignocellulosic feedstock. Thus, leaching lignocellulosic feedstock using 10
times the
maximum water holding capacity per kilogram of dry lignocellulosic feedstock
means
that the mass of aqueous solution is equal to 10 times the product of the mass
of the dry
lignocellulosic feedstock in kilograms and the maximum water holding capacity
per
kilogram of feedstock.
CA 02438984 2003-08-21
WO 02/070753 PCT/CA02/00244
-40-.
EXAMPLE 5: Method of Producing Ethanol
A 0.28 gram dry sample of Wiley-milled oat hull lignocellulosic feedstock is
leached
for 10 minutes in 2 ml of tap water. The leachate is removed and the
lignocellulosic
feedstock is pressed to about 50% (w/v) solids content and subsequently, the
leached
feedstock is placed in 7 grams of 1% sulfuric acid (pH 0.6 to 0.9) in a sealed
stainless
steel "bomb" reactor. The capacity of the bomb reactor is 9 ml. The bomb
reactor is
placed in a preheated 290 C oil bath for 50 seconds, and then cooled under
tap water.
The leached feedstock is now referred to as a pretreated feedstock
Thermocouple
measurements showed that the temperature in the interior of the bomb reached
260 C
by the end of the heating period. The average equivalent temperature was 235
C.
The pretreated feedstock is rinsed with tap water, and then vacuum-filtered
over glass
microfiber filter paper. The filter cakes are washed with tap water and air
dried.
The pretreated feedstock is subjected to hydrolysis by cellulase as follows. A
sample
of the pretreated feedstock corresponding to 0.05 grams of cellulose is added
to a 25 ml
flask with 4.9 grams of 0.05 M sodium citrate buffer, pH 4.8. Iogen Cellulase
(140 Filter
paper units (FPU)/ml) and Novozym 188 beta-glucosidase (1440 BGU/ml) are added
to
the flask in an amount corresponding to 9 FPU/gram cellulose and 125 BGU/gram
cellulose.
The flask is placed on an Orbit gyrotory shaker at 50 C and shaken for 20
hours at
250 RPM. At the end of this period, the contents of the flask is filtered over
glass
microfiber filter paper. The filtrate, which contains glucose and other sugars
is pH
adjusted, inoculated with a precultured mid log phase (about 400 Klett units)
S.
cerevisiae cell culture and the mixture is fermented anerobically at 30 C with
shaking for.
48 hours. After 48 hours of incubation, the mixture is centrifuged to separate
yeast from
the medium containing ethanol. The ethanol may be purified by distillation.
CA 02438984 2008-07-09
- 41 -
Using the methods described herein for biomass processing and ethanol
production,
yields of about 300-340 liter ethanol per metric ton dry biomass have been
produced.
Example 5 teaches washing of pretreated feedstock prior to converting
cellulose to
glucose and fermenting glucose to ethanol. However, it is also contemplated
that the entire
composition treated in the bomb reactor may be pH adjusted, treated with
cellulase to
convert cellulose to glucose and fermented to ethanol. In such an embodiment,
xylose is not
removed from the pretreated feedstock by washing. In still another embodiment,
xylose may
be removed from the pretreated feedstock and fermented independently of
glucose produced
from cellulose hydrolysis of the pretreated feedstock.
As will be evident to someone of skill in the art, fermentation of sugars such
as, but
not limited to glucose and xylose may be performed using a variety of
microorganisms, such
as, but not limited to yeast, bacteria or a combination thereof. Further, the
organisms may be
genetically modified organisms. Also, as is evident to someone of skill in the
art, there
exists other fermentation conditions which may be employed in the method of
the present
invention.
Also, as is evident to someone of skill in the art, ethanol may be recovered
and
purified from cultures medium by an method know in the art. These processes
are fully
contemplated in embodiments of the method of the invention.
The present invention has been described with regard to preferred embodiments.
However, it will be obvious to persons skilled in the art that a number of
variations and
modifications can be made without departing from the scope of the invention as
described
herein.
