Language selection

Search

Patent 2440416 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2440416
(54) English Title: PARTICLE BOMBARDMENT TRANSFORMATION OF BRASSICA
(54) French Title: TRANSFORMATION DE BRASSICA PAR BOMBARDEMENT DE PARTICULES
Status: Withdrawn
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C12N 5/10 (2006.01)
  • A01H 5/00 (2006.01)
  • C12N 5/04 (2006.01)
  • C12N 15/29 (2006.01)
  • C12N 15/90 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • CHEN, ZHIZHENG (United States of America)
  • CELIO, JENNIFER (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • CARGILL, INCORPORATED (United States of America)
(71) Applicants :
  • CARGILL INCORPORATED (United States of America)
(74) Agent: SIM & MCBURNEY
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(22) Filed Date: 1999-02-25
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 1999-09-02
Examination requested: 2003-09-04
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
09/031,178 United States of America 1998-02-26

Abstracts

English Abstract



The invention involves methods and materials related to the transformation of
Brassica by particle bombardment. Specifically, the
invention provides methods of preparing non-embryo Brassica tissue such that
Brassica cells are capable of being cultured, transformed
by particle bombardment, and regenerated into plants. In addition, this
invention provides stably transformed Brassica cells as well as their
progeny. This invention also provides methods of culturing Brassica tissue
with liquid medium such that transformed Brassica cells are
identified and regenerated into transformed Brassica plants.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.



CLAIMS

1. A transgenic Brassica plant cell, said plant cell
lacking T-DNA borders and having a nucleic acid
comprising a selectable marker stably integrated into its
genome, said selectable marker conferring herbicide
resistance.

2. The plant cell of claim 1, wherein said herbicide is
selected from the group consisting of glyphosate,
phosphinothricin, an imidazolinone, a sulfonylurea,
bromoxynil and dalapon.

3. The plant cell of claim 2, wherein said nucleic acid
encodes a bacterial ESPS synthase.

4. The plant cell of claim 1, wherein said plant cell
is from an F1 transgenic Brassica plant.

S. The plant cell of claim 1, wherein said plant cell
is from an F2 transgenic Brassica plant.

6. The plant cell of claim 1, wherein said plant cell
is from an F3 transgenic Brassica plant.

7. The plant cell of claim 1, wherein said plant cell
is from an F~ transgenic Brassica plant.

8. The plant cell of claim 1, wherein said plant cell
is from an BC3F4 transgenic Brassica plant.

9. A transgenic Brassica plant cell from a Brassica
inbred plant, said plant cell lacking T-DNA borders and
32


having a nucleic acid comprising a selectable marker
stably integrated into its genome.

10. The plant cell of claim 9, wherein said plant cell
is from a Brasicca napes plant.

11. A transgenic Brassica plant cell, said transgenic
Brassica plant cell lacking T-DNA borders and having a
nucleic acid stably integrated into its genome, said
nucleic acid being selected from the group consisting of:
a fatty acid desaturase, a fatty acid elongase, a
bacterial ESPS synthase, a chitinase and a glucan endo-
1,3-.beta.-glucosidase.

12. The plant cell of claim 11, wherein said plant cell
is from an F1 transgenic Brassica plant.

13. The plant cell of claim 11, wherein said plant cell
is from an F2 transgenic Brassica plant.

14. The plant cell of claim 11, wherein said plant cell
is from an F3 transgenic Brassica plant.

15. The plant cell of claim 11, wherein said plant cell
is from an F4 transgenic Brassica plant.

16. The plant cell of claim 11, wherein said plant cell
is from an BC3F4 transgenic Brassica plant.

17. The plant cell of claim 15, said plant cell further
has a nucleic acid comprising a selectable marker stably
integrated into its genome, said selectable marker
conferring herbicide resistance.

33



18. The plant cell of claim 17, wherein said herbicide
is selected from the group consisting of glyphosate,
phosphinothricin, an imidazolinone, a sulfonylurea,
bromoxynil, and dalapon.

19. The plant cell of claim 15, wherein plant is a
Brassica napus plant.

20. A transgenic brassica plant cell from an inbred
brassica plant, said plant cell lacking T-DNA borders and
having a nucleic acid stably integrated into the genome,
said nucleic acid selected from the group consisting of :

a fatty acid desaturase, a fatty acid elongase, a
bacterial ESPS synthase, a chitinase and a glucan end0-
1,3-.beta.-glucosidase.

21. The plant cell of claim 20, wherein said nucleic
acid is a fatty acid desaturase.

22. The plant cell of claim 20, wherein said nucleic
acid is a fatty acid elongase.

23. The plant cell of claim 20, wherein said nucleic
acid is a chitinase.

24. The plant cell of claim 20, wherein said nucleic
acid is a glucan endo-1,3-glucosidase.

25. A method of producing one or more transformed
Brassica cells, said method comprising the steps of:
(a) bombarding cells prepared from haploid non
embryo Brassica tissue with microprojectiles coated with
nucleic acid to form a bombarded cell preparation; and
34




(b) identifying one or more cells of said bombarded
preparation that have been stably transformed with said
nucleic acid, wherein said one or more identified cells
are said transformed Brassica cells.

26. The method of claim 25, further comprising the step
of inducing chromosome doubling in said identified cells.

27. The method of claim 26, further comprising the step
of regenerating one or more Brassica plants from said one
or more identified cells.

28. The method of claim 25, wherein said nucleic acid
comprises a selectable marker conferring herbicide
resistance.

29. The method of claim 28, wherein said herbicide is
selected from the group consisting of glyphosate,
phosphinothricin, an imidazolinone, a sulfonylurea,
bromoxynil, and dalapon.

30. A method for producing a transgenic Brassica plant,
said method comprising:
(a) bombarding cells prepared from non-embryo
Brassica tissue with microprojectiles coated with nucleic
acid to form a bombarded cell preparation;

(b) selecting one or more cells of said bombarded
preparation that have been transformed with said nucleic
acid; and

(c) regenerating a Brassica plant from said one or
more selected cells, wherein said regenerated Brassica
plant is stably transformed with said nucleic acid and
wherein said nucleic acid is selected from the group
consisting of: a fatty acid desaturase, a fatty acid



elongase, a chitinase, and a glucan endo-1,3-.beta.-
glucosidase.

31. The method of claim 30, wherein said nucleic acid
further comprises a selectable marker conferring
herbicide resistance.

32. The method of claim 31, wherein said herbicide is
selected from the group consisting of glyphosate,
phosphinothricin, an imidazolinone, a sulfonylurea,
bromoxynil, and dalapon.

33. A method for producing a transgenic Brassica inbred
line, said method comprising:

(a) backcrossing a transgenic Brassica plant to
plants of a normal elite inbred line, said transgenic
Brassica plant lacking T-DNA borders and having a nucleic
acid comprising a selectable marker stably integrated
into its genome, whereby said normal elite inbred line is
converted to a transgenic Brassica inbred line.

34. A method for producing a transgenic Brassica inbred
line, said method comprising:

(a) backcrossing a transgenic Brassica plant to
plants of a normal elite inbred line, said transgenic
Brassica plant lacking T-DNA borders and having a nucleic
acid comprising a nucleic acid selected from the group
consisting of: a fatty acid desaturase, a fatty acid
elongase, a chitinase, and a glucan endo-1,3-.beta.-
glucosidase, whereby said normal elite inbred line is
converted to a transgenic Brassica inbred line.
36


35. A transgenic Brassica plant, wherein said plant
comprises an introduced nucleic acid lacking T-DNA
borders.
37

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02440416 2003-09-04
WO 99143202 PCTIUS99/04117
PARTICLE BOMBARDMENT TRANSFORMATION OF ERASSICA
BACKGROUND
Techni ca3 Fi eld
The invention relates to methods and materials
involved in the transformation of Brassica by particle
bombardment.
2. Background Information


Brassica species include a large group of


agriculturally important crops that are used by humans as~


vegetables, edible oils, and condiments. In fact,


Brassica oil production accounts fcr more than 2 percent


--._ _of .the world.'..s edibh_.oil_.__._._To imp_rove_the guali~._,of .
_ _ _ _; . -


agriculturally important crops, cultivators have


traditionally relied upon conventional breeding methods.


With the current advances in plant molecular biology and


genetics, however, cultivators can now improve plant


quality through the introduction of foreign DNA.


Several different methods have been used to


transform plants. One commonly used method involves


bombarding plant cells with microparticles that have been


coated with the DNA of interest. Indeed, particle


bombardment methods have been widely used to transform


corn, soybean, wheat, and rice. Attempts to transform


Brassica species using particle bombardment, however,


have not been as successful. In fact, the only


- successful transformation of Brassica required


substantial manipulation of Brassica embryos. Thus,


researchers currently rely on alternative approaches such


as Agrobacterium-mediated methods to transform Brassica.


1

CA 02440416 2003-09-04
The invention involves the transformation of
Brassica species by particle bombardment. Specifically,
the invention is based on the discovery of a quick and
convenient tissue preparation technique that results in
Brassica cells that are capable of being cultured,
transformed by particle bombardment, and regenerated into
plants. In addition, the invention provides transformed
cells as well as regenerated plants that grow to maturity
and set seeds. Such regenerated plants and their
offspring stable express the transferred nucleic acid
molecule. The complicity of the invented method
described herein makes particle bombardment
transformation in Brassica not only possible, but also
economically feasible.
In accordance with an aspect of the invention,
there is provided a transgenic Brassica plant cell, said
plant cell lacking T-DNA borders and having a nucleic
acid comprising a selectable marker stably integrated
into its genome, said selectable marker conferring
herbicide resistance.
In accordance with another aspect of the
invention, there is provided a transgenic Brassica plant
cell from a Brassica inbred plant, said plant cell
lacking T-DNA borders and having a nucleic acid
comprising a selectable marker stably integrated into its
genome.
In accordance with a further aspect of the
invention, A transgenic Brassica plant cell, said
transgenic Brassica plant cell lacking T-DNA borders and
having a nucleic acid stably integrated into its genome,
said nucleic acid being selected from the group
consisting of: a fatty acid desaturase, a fatty acid
2

CA 02440416 2003-09-04
elongase, a bacterial ESPS synthase, a chitinase and a
glucan endo-1,3-(3-glucosidase.
In accordance with another aspect of the
invention, there is provided a transgenic brassica plant
cell from an inbred brassica plant, said plant cell
lacking TODBA borders and having a nucleic acid stably
integrated into the genome, said nucleic acid selected
from the group consisting of . a fatty acid desaturase,
a fatty acid elongase, a bacterial ESPS synthase, a
chitinase and a glucan end0-1,3-(3-glucosidase.
In accordance with a further aspect of the
invention, a method of producing one or more transformed
Brassica cells, said method comprises the steps of:
(a) bombarding cells prepared from haploid non-
embryo Brassica tissue with microprojectiles coated with
nucleic acid to form a bombarded cell preparation; and
(b) identifying one or more cells of said bombarded
preparation that have been stably transformed with said
nucleic acid, wherein said one or more identified cells
are said transformed Brassica cells.
In accordance with another aspect of the
invention, a method for producing a transgenic Brassica
plant, said method comprises:
(a) bombarding cells prepared from non-embryo
Brassica tissue with microprojectiles coated with nucleic
acid to form a bombarded cell preparation;
(b) selecting one or mare cells of said bombarded
preparation that have been transformed with said nucleic
acid; and
(c) regenerating a Brassica plant from said one or
more selected cells, wherein said regenerated Brassica
plant is stably transformed with said nucleic acid and
wherein said nucleic acid is selected from the group
consisting of: a fatty acid desaturase, a fatty acid
3

CA 02440416 2003-09-04
elongase, a chitinase, and a glucan endo-1,3-~-
glucosidase.
In accordance with a further aspect of the
invention, a method for producing a transgenic Brassica
inbred line, said method comprises:
(a) backcrossing a transgenic Brassica plant to
plants of a normal elite inbred Line, said transgenic
Brassica plant lacking T-DNA borders and having a nucleic
acid comprising a selectable marker stably integrated
into its genome, whereby said normal elite inbred line is
converted to a transgenic Brassica inbred line.
In accordance with another aspect of the
invention, a method for producing a transgenic Brassica
inbred line, said method comprises:
(a) backcrossing a transgenic Brassica plant to
plants of a normal elite inbred line, said transgenic
Brassica plant lacking T-DNA borders and having a nucleic
acid comprising a nucleic acid selected from the group
consisting of: a fatty acid desaturase, a fatty acid
elongase, a chitinase, and a glucan endo-1,3-~-
glucosidase, whereby said normal elite inbred line is
converted to a transgenic Brassica inbred line.
In accordance with a further aspect of the
invention, a transgenic Brassica plant, wherein said
plant comprises an introduced nucleic acid lacking T-DNA
borders.
Unless otherwise defined, all technical and
scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as
commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art
to which this invention belongs. Although methods and
materials similar or equivalent to those described herein
can be used in the practice or testing of the present
invention, suitable methods and materials are described
below. In case of conflict, the present specification,
4

CA 02440416 2003-09-04
including definitions, will control. In addition, the
materials, methods, and examples are illustrative only
and not intended to be limiting.
Other features and advantages of the invention will
be apparent from the following detailed description, and
from the claims.
DESCRIPTION OF DRAWTNGS
Figure 1 is a diagram depicting the pIMC38 construct
used in the experiments reported herein.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
The invention provides methods and materials related to
the transformation of Brassica by particle bombardment.
Specifically, the invention provides methods of preparing
non-embryo Brassica tissue such that Brassica cells are
capable of being cultured, transformed by particle
bombardment, and regenerated into plants. The invention
also provides stably transformed Brassica cells as well
as their progeny. Transformed plants are also referred to
herein as transgenic plants.
4a

CA 02440416 2003-09-04
WO 99/43202 PC'f/US99104117
Tissue Preparation


A cell or tissue preparation is defined as a group


of cells or tissues arranged in a manner suitable for


particle bombardment. To ensure successful


transformation, the cell or tissue preparation provides a


.
relatively large number of cells, preferably rapidly


dividing cells, that are exposed at the surface such that


they can receive nucleic acid coated particles. In


addition, the recipient cells must be able to continue


growing and to regenerate plants. A number of non-embryo


Brassica cell or tissue sources can be used to prepare


cell or tissue preparations that meet these criteria.


For example, leaf protoplasts, isolated micraspore


cultures, stem tissues, and hypocotyl tissues derived


from Brassica can be used as sources of Brassica cells.


--- ---- Using non-embryo--tissue---sources----cons-iderably--simpi-ifiesww
--


transformation procedures. Typically, hypocotyl tissues


prepared from young seedlings grown under sterile


conditions are used. In this case; the hypocotyl can be


cut into longitudinal slices. Alternatively, an upper


portion of a seedling can be ground into a cellular


slurry. Such an upper portion can include the two


cotyledons, shoot tip, as well as the top section of the


hypocotyl.


A cellular slurry is any liquid suspension of


insoluble cellular matter that contains viable cells. A


blender can be used to grind Brassica tissue into a


cellular slurry. In addition, a cellular slurry can be


sorted into groups based on the size of the insoluble


cellular matter. For example, a cellular slurry can be


sorted through a series of meshes such that insoluble


cellular matter of a particular size is enriched. A


cellular slurry of any size can be used for particle


bombardment provided the cellular slurry contains viable


cells. For example, a cellular slurry can be enriched



5

CA 02440416 2003-09-04
,
WO 99/43202 PCTNS99/04117
for cellular matter about 35 microns to about 500 microns
in size or about 46 microns to about 230 microns in size
and used for particle bombardment.


The Brassica tissue preparations can contain


S diploid or haploid cells. When using diploid cells, it


is understood that the resulting transformed cells will '-


most likely be heterozygous at each integration site. In


other words, it is extremely unlikely that a copy of the


introduced nucleic acid will integrate into the same


position on both chromosomes. When using haploid cells,


however, the resulting transformed haploid cells can be'


treated with colchicine to induce chromosome doubling.



Thus, the resulting cells will most likely be homozygous


at each integration site. -Alternatively, haploid plants_ _


can be regenerated from the resulting transformed haploid


_ cells . . These-- haploid--plant.-s then;_.__.i.n_.~urn~_ -~~~.. .
~ __..__ _.__.._ _..
__


crossed with other plants to produce plants that are


either heterozygous or homozygous at particular


integration sites. Further, cells that integrate an


introduced nucleic acid sequence into their genome are


called stably transformed cells. Stably transformed


cells typically retain the introduced nucleic acid


sequence with each cell division. Cells that contain


introduced nucleic acid sequences that are not integrated


into the genome are called transiently transformed cells.


Transiently transformed cells typically lose some portion


of the introduced nucleic acid sequence with each cell


division. Thus, transformed cells can be either


transiently and/or stably transformed.


A non-embryo Brassica tissue preparation can be


cultured on induction medium before bombardment, e.g., a


solid induction medium. Typically, solid medium is made


from liquid medium by adding agar. Induction medium


typically contains Murashige and Skoog tMS) medium as


well as relatively higher concentrations of auxin, e.g.,


6

CA 02440416 2003-09-04
WO 99143202 PC'fIUS99/04117
2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D), and relatively
lower concentrations of cytokinin, e.g., kinetin. For
example, 1 mg/L of 2,4-D and 0.3 mg/L kinetin can be


added to MS medium and used. In addition, the tissue


preparation is usually cultured on the induction medium


for 1-3 days before bombardment.


For the purpose of this invention, solid and/or


liquid tissue culture techniques can be used. For


example, the induction, selection, and regeneration


medium can be either in solid or liquid form. When using


solid medium, the Brassica tissue can be placed directly


onto the medium or can be placed onto a filter film that


is then placed in contact with the medium. When using


liquid medium, the Brassica tissue can-be placed onto a _.


floatation device that contacts the liquid medium. A


__ _ floatation_ device is typ.icall.y--a -.por-ous membrane-as~- -


described elsewhere (US Patent No. 5,324,65?). Examples


of floatation devices, methods of using floatation


devices, and accessory equipment that aids in liquid


culture techniques are ready available from manufacturers


such as Life Technologies (Rockville, MD) and Osmotek .


Ltd. (Kiryat Weizmann Rehovot 76120, Israel). Typically,


faster grown tissue is cultured on liquid medium. For


example, liquid selection medium and liquid regeneration


medium can be used to culture Brassica juncea tissue.


Nucleic Acid Molecules


Either circular or linear nucleic acid molecules


can be used to coat particles that are, in turn, used to


transform Brassica. In addition, these nucleic acid


molecules can be RNA or DNA, including cDNA, genomic DNA,


and synthetic (e.g., chemically synthesized) DNA, and can


be double-stranded or single-stranded. Where single-


stranded, the nucleic acid can be the sense strand or the


anti-sense strand. Fragments of these molecules are also


7

CA 02440416 2003-09-04
WO 99143202 PGTlUS99/04117
considered within the scope of the invention, and can be
produced, for example, by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
or generated by treatment with one or more restriction .


endonucleases. RNA molecules can be produced, for '


example, by in vitro transcription.



The nucleic acid molecules of the invention -


typically encode a polypeptide or regulate the expression


of a polypeptide. For example, a cDNA that encodes an


enzyme or an anti-sense molecule that prevents an enzyme


from being made can be used. The term "anti-sense


molecule" encompasses any nucleic acid molecule that


contains sequences that are complementary to the coding .


strand of a naturally-occurring polypeptide. An anti-


sense molecule can also include flanking sequences, e.g., __


regulatory sequences, or introns. Thus, enzymatic


-. nucleic acid. molecules---that--spec3,~ica1-ly targe-t- aid-~-----


cleave RNA by using complementary anti-sense sequences


such as ribozymes as well as anti-sense oligonucleotides


are considered anti-sense molecules within the scope of


the invention. These ribozymes can have any general


structure including, without limitation, hairpin,


hammerhead, or axhead structures, provided the molecule


cleaves RNA.


Generally, a nucleic acid molecule of the


invention is in the form of a plasmid and contains.


sequences that encode a polypeptide as well as promote


the expression of the polypeptide when present in a


Brassica cell. The sequences that promote polypeptide


expression are typically regulatory sequences that flank


the polypeptide encoding sequences. A polypeptide can be


any synthetically engineered or biologically derived


polypeptide. In addition, the polypeptide can be


naturally occurring in Brassica or heterologous to


Brassica. Thus, Brassica polypeptides, plant


polypeptides, non-plant polypeptides, modified


8

CA 02440416 2003-09-04
WO 99/43202 PCTIUS99104117
polypeptides, synthetic polypeptides, and portions of
polypeptides are considered within the scope of the


invention. .


The compositions of, and methods of constructing,


nucleic acid molecules for successful transformation of


plants are well known to those skilled in the art. For


example, the uses of suitable nucleic acid components


such as promoters, polyadenylation sequences, selectable


marker sequences, reporter sequences, enhancers, introns,


and the like as well as references providing the specific


compositions of those components are described elsewhere


(Weising et al., Ann. Rev. Genetics 22:421-478 (1988)),


In addition, suitable methods of construction are


described elsewhere (Sambrook J., et al.~ Molecular


Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd ed., Cold Spring Harbor


___ ___ Laboratory press--(1g89)-i . It__.i~-important-_ tn__note- that
_


the same or similar compositions and methods can be used


herein to produce nucleic acid molecules that are useful


for transforming Brassica since the specific composition


of the nucleic acid molecule used to transform Brassica


is not central to the present invention and the invention


is not dependent upon the composition of the specific


transforming nucleic acid molecule used.


Nucleic acid molecules that are particularly


useful for transforming Brassica include DNA molecules


that provide for, or enhance, a beneficial feature of the


resultant transformed Brassica plant. For example, the


DNA can encode polypeptides or anti-sense molecules that


promote increased food values, higher yields, pest


resistance, disease resistance, and the like. Specific


examples include, without limitation, a heterologous


fatt acid des urase or fatty acid elongase that alters


fatty acid composition, a Bt-en~'o~'~e a o protease


inhibitor that confers insect resistance; a bacterial


ESPS synthase gene that confers resistance to glyphosate


9

CA 02440416 2003-09-04
WO 99/43202 PCT/US99/04117
herbicide; and a chitinase or glucan endo- ,3-B-


glucosidase gene that confers~ici al properties. Tn


addition, the nucleic a~~ mo~~e can be introduced


into Brassica to act as a genetic tool to generate


mutants and/or assist in the identification, genetic


tagging, or isolation of segments of Brassica DNA.


Additional nucleic acid molecules that provide a


beneficial feature or are useful as a genetic tool are


commonly known to the skilled artisan and are considered


within the scope of the invention.


The nucleic acid molecule introduced into Brassi~a


can also contain nucleic acid sequences that encode a



selectable marker, a reporter, or both. The expression


of these sequences in Brassica can facilitate--the __ __-_


identification and selection of cells transformed stably,


___- _ r.ansiently, or both--= .-_. Alt-er~native~~;-__the se3.ee-t-a3~1~-
._. w
_ ____ - -.__.


marker can be carried on a separate nucleic acid molecule


that is introduced using a cotransformation procedure.


The sequences encoding these selectable markers and


reporters can be flanked with appropriate regulatory


-sequences that facilitate expression in Brassica. Useful


selectable markers are well known in the art and include,


for example, antibiotic and herbicide resistance genes.


Specific examples of such genes are disclosed elsewhere


(Weising et al., Ann. Rev. Genetics 22:421-478 (1988)).


A typical selectable marker gene is the aminoglycoside


phosphotransferase gene of transposon Tn5 (AphII) that


encodes a polypeptide that confers resistance to the


antibiotics kanamycin, neomycin, and 6418 (geneticin).


Other selectable markers known in the art include the


hygromycin H phosphotransferase (HPT) coding sequence


that can be derived from E. coli as well as those genes


that encode polypeptides that confer resistance or


:tolerance to glyphosate, methotrexate, phosphinothricin,


'imidazolinones, sulfonylureas, bromoxynil, dalapon, and



CA 02440416 2003-09-04
WO 99143202 PCTIUS99104117
the like. The expression of selectable marker genes that
confer herbicide resistance or tolerance in transformed
Brassica plants are commercially useful.


Reporter genes that encode easily assayable marker


polypeptides are well known in the art. In general, a


reporter gene is a gene that is not present or expressed


by the recipient organism or tissue and that encodes a


polypeptide whose expression is manifested by some easily


detectable property, e.g. phenotypic change or enzymatic


activity. Examples of such reporters are provided


elsewhere (Weising et aI.,,Ann. Rev. Genetics 22:421-478


(1988)). Typical reporters include the green fluorescent


protein (GFP) gene from the bioluminescent jellyfish


Aequorea victoria, variants of GFP, chloramphenicol _


acetyl transferase gene from Tn9 of E. Coli, beta-


__ . glucuronidase g.ene_~f. the-u:idA- loc-u~-of .E..--C-o3~..'_..an~-
__-_.._____...
_. ._-_.....


luciferase genes from the firefly Photinus pyralis.


Vectors containing GFP and GFP variant nucleic acid


sequences are available commercially from Clontech


Laboratories, Inc. (Palo Alto, CA). GFP Application


Notes (Living Colors'"; PT2040-1; Clontech Laboratories,


Inc.) describes both GFP and GFP variants.


The regulatory sequences useful herein include any


constitutive, inducible, tissue or organ specific,, or


developmental stage specific promoters that operate in


plant cells. Suitable such promoters are disclosed


elsewhere (Weising et al., Ann. Rev. Genetics 22:421-478


(1988)). The following is a partial representative list


of promoters suitable for use herein: regulatory


sequences from the T-DNA of Agrobacterium tumefaciens,


including mannopine synthase, nopaline synthase, and


octopine synthase; alcohol dehydrogenase promoter from


corn; light inducible promoters such as the ribulose-


biphosphate-carboxylase small subunit gene from a variety


of species; the major chlorophyll a/b binding protein


11

CA 02440416 2003-09-04
.
WO 99143202 PCT/US99104117
gene promoter; 355 and 19S promoters of cauliflower


mosaic virus; developmentally regulated promoters such as


oleosin, cruciferin, napin, and phaseolin promoters; as


well as synthetic or other natural promoters that are


either inducible or constitutive, including those


promoters exhibiting organ specific expression or


expression at specific developmental stages) of the


plant.


Particularly, preferred promoters are those that


allow seed-specific expression. Such promotes useful


since seeds are the primary source of vegetable oils and


also since seed-specific expression will avoid any


i
i


ous effect in non-seed t
potential deleter
ssues.


Examples of seed-specific promoters_include,- but are not,


limited to, the promoters of seed storage proteins, which


... . __._.can. represent_._up__to 9~~-...o~_ total.-seed-r-0tein;-._
_ i~ ..Man.._


plants. The seed storage proteins are strictly


regulated, being expressed almost exclusively in seeds in


a highly tissue-specific and stage-specific manner


(Higgins et al., Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. 35:191-221


(1984); Goldbexg et al., CeI1 56:149-160 (1989)).


Moreover, different seed storage proteins may be


expressed at different stages of seed development.


Expression of seed-specific genes has been studied


in great detail (See reviews by Goldberg et al., Cell


56:149-160 (1989)) and Higgins et al., Ann. Rev. Plant


Physiol. 35:191-221 (1984)). There are currently


numerous examples of seed-specific expression of seed


storage protein genes in transgenic dicotyledonous


plants.


Other examples of seed-specific promoters are from
genes expressed during early embryogenesis and oil
biosynthesis. For example, native regulatory sequences,
including the native promoters, of fatty acid desaturase
genes can be used following their isolation by those
12

CA 02440416 2003-09-04
.
WO 99/43202 PC'fIUS99/04117
skilled in the art. Heterologous promoters from other


genes involved in seed oil biosynthesis, such as those


for Brassica napus isocitrate lyase and malate synthase


(Comai et al., Plant Cell 1:293-300 (1989)), delta-9


desaturase from safflower (Thompson et al., Proc: Natl.


Acad. Sci. USA 88:2578-2582 (1991)) and castor (Shanklin


et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:2510-2514 (1991)),


acyl carrier protein (ACP) from Arabidopsis (Post-


Beittenmiller et al., Nucl. Acids Res. (1989) 17:1777),


Brassica napus (Safford et al., Eur. J. Biochem. 174:287-


295 (1988)), and Brassica campestris (Rose et al., Nue~:


Acids Res. 15:7197 (1987)), ~i-ketoacyl-ACP synthetase.


from barley (Siggaard-Andersen et al., Proc. Natl. Acad.


_ Sci. USA 88:4114-4118___(1991) ) , and_oleosin from Zea mays__
_____


(Lee et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:6181'-6185


_~__ _._ __ .(.19-91.x--)-,-... soybean-.(-Genba~k---Access3-on-~1o-: X-6-
9~'~a~d
~_ -_


Brassica napus (Lee et al., Plant Physiol. 96:1395-1397


(1991)) will be of use.


A nucleic acid molecule can also contain other


elements such as introns, enhancers, polyadenylation


sequences and the like. Such elements may or may not be


necessary for the function of the nucleic acid molecule,


although they can provide better expression or


functioning of the nucleic acid molecule by affecting


transcription, stability of the mRNA, or the like. Such


elements can be included in the nucleic acid molecule as


desired to obtain the optimal performance of the


transforming nucleic acid in the plant. Sufficient


expression, however, for a selectable marker to perform


satisfactorily can often be obtained without an intron.


To determine if a particular combination of


nucleic acid components functions as desired, Brassiea


recipient cells can be stably or transiently transformed


by particle bombardment with a nucleic acid molecule



construct that contains both that particular combination


13

CA 02440416 2003-09-04
WO 99143202 PCTIUS99I04117
as well as a reporter. At a suitable time after
transformation, an assay for expression of the reporter
can be performed. One assay, for example, entails
identifying the transient expression of the E. Coli beta-
s glucuronidase (GUS) gene (Jefferson et al . , EMEO J. .
6:3901-3907 (1987)). In this case, a suitable time for -
conducting the assay is about 1-3 days after bombardment.
The use of transient assays is particularly important _
when using a nucleic acid molecule that contains
components that have not previously been demonstrated or
confirmed as compatible with the desired Brassica
recipient cells.
Parti c1 a Bombardmen t
The nucleic acid molecules described herein are
introduced into- non-embryo--;Brass3-ca-- tiss-ue preparatior~s
using a particle bombardment process. General
descriptions of suitable particle bombardment instruments
and particle bombardment methods are provided elsewhere
(Sanford et al., J. Part. Sci. Technol. 5:27-37 (1987));
Heiser W., "Optimization of Biolistic° transformation
using the helium-driven PDS-1000/He system" in US/EG
Bulletin 1688, BIO-RAD; and Dunder et al., "Comparison of
performance characteristics of different Biolistic°
devices" in US/EG Bulletin 1689, BIO-RAD). Briefly, the
particle bombardment process, also referred to as a
biolistic process, delivers a desired nucleic acid
molecule to a cell by using very small particles, made
from a biologically inert material, that have been coated
with a nucleic acid molecule. When the inert particles
are coated with the nucleic acid molecule and accelerated
to a suitable velocity, one or more of the particles
enter into one or more of the cells, with the nucleic
acid molecule being released from the particle and
expressed within the cell. While some of the cells may
14

CA 02440416 2003-09-04
WO 99/43202 PCT/US99/04117
be fatally damaged by the bombardment process, others
survive. Some of the recipient cells that survive stably
retain the introduced nucleic acid molecule and express
it.
The particles, called microprojectiles, are


generally of a high density material such as tungsten or


gold. They are coated with the nucleic acid molecule of


interest. Coating procedures have been described in


detail elsewhere (Stanford et al., Methods Enzymol.


217:483-509 (1993) and Heiser W., "Optimization of


Biolistic transformation using the helium-driven PDS-


1000/He system" in US/EG Bulletin 1688, BIO-RAD): The


microprojectiles are then placed onto the surface of a


macroprojectile that serves to transfer the motive force


from a suitable energy source to the microprojectiles.


After the- maexoprojecti3e..._and- t~e-_mi~roproj~ct-3-less-_a~.e.,___.___._
- _... ...


accelerated to the proper velocity, they contact a


blocking device that prevents the macroprojectile from


continuing its forward path but allows the nucleic acid


molecule-coated microprojectiles to continue on and


impact the recipient Brassica cells. Suitable


instruments can use a variety of motive forces such as a


high pressure helium tank, gunpowder, and shock waves


from an electric arc discharge (Sanford et al., J. Part.


Sci . Technol . 5 : 27-37 ( 1987 ) and Sanford et al . ,


Technique 3:3-16 (1988)).


A protocol for the use of a gunpowder instrument


is provided by Klein T et al. (Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.


U.S.A. 85:9305-4309 (1988) and Bio/Technology 6:599-563


- 30 (1988)) and involves two major steps. First, tungsten


microprojectiles are coated when mixed with the nucleic


acid molecule, calcium chloride, and spermidine free-base


in a specified order in an aqueous solution. The


concentrations of the various components can be varied.



For example, any concentration of the nucleic acid



CA 02440416 2003-09-04
WO 99143202 PCTNS99/04117
molecule can be used provided the recipient Brassica
cells express the transferred nucleic acid molecule.
Second, in the actual bombardment, both the distance of
the recipient cells from the end of the barrel and the
vacuum in the sample chamber are set. These settings are
also described elsewhere (Klein et al., Bio/Technology
6:599-563 (1988)) and can be varied.
A protocol for the use of a high pressure helium _
tank instrument (Biolistic° PDS-1000/He Particle Delivery
System) is provided by the manufacture (BIO-RAD, Hercules
CA). Specific conditions such as the concentration of
the nucleic acid molecule used to coat microprojectiles,.
the helium pressure used to accelerate the
microprojectiles, and the distance of the stopp.ing_screen --.
from the sample, can be varied. Typically, the~recipient
_. t.i_ssue- is- pos-it-Toned - about.. 6_ . o....~_.cm bel flw-_.th~,-
_stoPPl~g ____ ._.. . _
plate tray.
The specific Brassica tissue preparations
described herein can be placed on a petri dish or other
surface and arranged in essentially any manner,
recognizing that (I) the area in the center of the dish
may receive the heaviest concentration of nucleic acid
molecule-coated particles and the tissue located there
may suffer damage during bombardment and (ii) the number
of particles reaching a cell may decrease as the distance
of the cell from the center of the blast area increases
such that cells far from the center of the dish may not _
be bombarded and transformed. The Biolistic° PDS-1000/He
Particle Delivery System (BIO-RAD, Hercules CA) can
deliver a more even distribution of microprojectiles to -
recipient cells. A mesh screen, preferably of metal,
optionally can be laid on the dish to prevent splashing
or ejection of the tissue. The tissue can be bombarded
one or more times with the nucleic acid molecule-coated
particles. In addition, cells can be bombarded with
16

CA 02440416 2003-09-04
. ~ ~ i
WO 99/43202 PCTIUS99104117
particles coated with a single type of nucleic acid
' molecule or multiple different nucleic acid molecules.


Likewise, a tissue preparation can be bombarded with a


collection of particles wherein the collection contains


different sets each coated with a different nucleic acid


molecule.


Identifying Transformed Brassica


Once the Erassica tissue preparation has been


bombarded with the coated particles and the nucleic acid


molecule has penetrated some of the cells, it is


necessary to identify cells that both contain the nucleic
.


acid molecule and retain sufficient regenerative


capacity. Many approaches can be used to identify


transformed plant cells and are known to those skilled in


_.. . 15. the art ..__ Briefly,_.._two _ general- approaches--foun~ ~-~-
__.__.___
......


useful are described. First, transformed Brassica cells


or plants regenerated from them can be screened for the


presence of the nucleic acid molecule by various standard


methods including, without limitation, assays for the


expression of a reporter contained within the nucleic


acid molecule and assessments of phenotypic effects


caused by the expression of the nucleic acid molecule, if


any. Second, a selectable marker sequence can be


transmitted along with or as part of the nucleic acid


molecule. In this case, transformed cells can be


identified by the use of a selective agent to detect


expression of the selectable marker.


Selection conditions must be chosen so as to allow


growth and accumulation of transformed cells while


simultaneously inhibiting the growth of non-transformed


cells. This situation can be complicated by the fact


that the vitality of individual cells in a population is


often highly dependent on the vitality of neighboring


cells. In addition, selection conditions must not be so


17

CA 02440416 2003-09-04
i 1
WO 99143202 PC'fIUS99104117
severe that the plant regenerating capacity of


transformed cells and the fertility of the resulting


plant are precluded. Thus, the effects of the selection


agent on cell viability and morphology should be


evaluated. This can be accomplished beforehand by


experimentally producing a growth inhibition curve for a


given selective agent and tissue, thereby establishing


the concentration range that does not inhibit growth.


When using a selectable marker, the bombarded


Brassica tissue can be either allowed to recover from the


bombardment on non-selective medium or directly


transferred to medium containing the selection agent.



Selection procedures typically involve exposing


_ the bombarded tissue to a toxic agent.- The tissue can be


subjected to sequential changes in the concentration of .


._ . theca agent--as we33 as.._mui.t-i~l~.._rounds--
of.._.Se~ect~~~~~~e...____~____..._
_..


particular concentrations and cycle lengths typically


vary depending on the particular agent used. In


addition, the selection procedure can involve using an


initial selection round at a relatively low toxic agent


concentration and then later rounds) at higher


concentration(s). This allows the selective agent to


exert its toxic effect slowly over a longer period of


time. Initially, the concentration of the agent can be


such that about a 5-40% level of growth inhibition


occurs, as determined from a growth inhibition curve.


The goal is to allow transformed cells to grow and divide _


preferentially while inhibiting untransformed cells, but


not to the extent that growth of transformed cells is


prevented. Once a few individual transformed cells have


grown sufficiently, the tissue can be shifted to media


containing a higher concentration of the toxic agent to


kill essentially all untransformed cells. The shift to


higher concentrations also reduces the possibility of


non-transformed cells habituating to the agent. A higher


18

CA 02440416 2003-09-04
i
WO 99143202 PC'TNS99/04117
concentration can be a concentration that inhibits about
30 to 100% growth. The length of the first selection


cycle can be from about l to 4 weeks, typically about 2


weeks. Later selection cycles can be from about 1 to


S about 12 weeks, typically about 2 to about 10 weeks.


Putative Brassica transformants generally can be


identified as proliferating sectors of tissue or cells


against a background of non-proliferating cells. The


bombarded Brassica tissue can also be cultured on non-


selective media at various times during the overall


selection procedure.


Once a sector is identified as a putative


transformant, transformation can be confirmed by


phenotypic and/or genotypic analysis. If a selection_ _


agent is used, an example of phenotypic analys is can


_--_ __ include measuring._any_.increa-se--3~--f.r-esh weight fl~~he- . ...-

.. - ._._


putative transformant as compared to a control on various


levels of the selective agent. Other analyses that can


be used will depend on the function of the transferred


nucleic acid molecule. For example, if an enzyme or


other polypeptide is encoded by the nucleic acid


molecule, then enzymatic or immunological assays specific


for that particular enzyme or polypeptide can be used.


Specific bioassay and chemical assay techniques that are


suitable for detecting the expression of transferred


nucleic acid molecules are well known in the art and are


not repeated here. The presence of the nucleic acid


itself cari also be confirmed by conventional procedures,


i.e. Southern blot, Northern blot, or PCR analysis or the


. 30 like.


Regeneration of Brassica Plants


Transformed Brassica cells can be regenerated into


plants and the fertility of the resultant plants


determined. Briefly, cells that test positive for


19

CA 02440416 2003-09-04
1
WO 99143202 PCT/US99104117
transformation are placed on medium that promotes tissue
differentiation and plant regeneration. An example of a
regeneration medium includes, without limitation, MS
medium containing relatively lower concentrations of
auxin, e.g., indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), and relatively
higher concentrations of cytokinin, e.9., zeatin. The
specific regeneration process can be carried out in .
accordance with standard procedures well known in the
art. Typically, these procedures entail reducing the
level of auxin. The regenerating medium can also contain
the same selection agent used in the selection medium.
The regenerated plants can be grown to maturity in a
growth room or greenhouse and appropriate sexual crosses
and selfs made. _ _ _
It is important to note that plant regeneration,
wh33e importans -t-o- the--present-- inventi-on,---can--be-----------'-------
ww----- w
performed in any conventional manner. For example, if a
selectable marker has been introduced into the cells,
then a selection agent can be incorporated into the
regeneration medium to further confirm that the
regenerated plantlets are transformed. Since
regeneration techniques are well known and not critical
to the present invention, any technique that accomplishes
regeneration and produces fertile plants can be used.
ZS Analysis of Progeny
The plants regenerated from transformed Brassica
are referred to as the Ro generation or Ra plants. The
seeds produced by various sexual crosses of Ro generation
plants are referred to as R1 progeny or R1 generations.
When R, seeds are germinated, the resulting plants are
also referred to as the R, generation.
The R1 generation should be analyzed to confirm
successful transmission and inheritance of the
transferred nucleic acid molecule. The analysis can be

CA 02440416 2003-09-04
WO 99/43202 PCT/US99/04117
performed using any of the methods described herein to
identify transformants taking into account that any
portion of the plant can be used. Further, any R~ or
later (e . g . , Rz, R" R,, and etc . ) plants as well as F, or
later (e. g., F~, F" F" and etc) plants can be analyzed.
it is apparent from the above that the term
progeny includes descendants of a particular cell, cell
line, plant, or plant line, e.g., seeds developed on a
plant and plants derived from such seeds. Progeny of a
plant include seeds formed on Ro, R" RZ and subsequent
generat ion p1 ant s , seeds formed on F" FZ , F3 , and
subsequent generation plants, or seeds formed on BCI, BCz,
BC3 and subsequent generation plants. Thus, selfed
_progeny includes not only-the Rr progeny of the initial
self-pollination, but also RZ, R" and subsequent
_ _.___gene-rati-ons:--.-- ._-_____.__._.._ _._-_. . _ ..____._._._-__ .___..
._____
Breeding Transgenic Brassica
Generally, commercial value of transformed
Brassica plants produced herein will be greatest if the
nucleic acid molecule can be incorporated into many
different varieties. A farmer typically grows several
varieties based on differences in maturity, standability,
and other agronomic traits. Also, the farmer must select
a variety based upon geographic location since varieties
adapted to a specific growing environment are generally
not adapted to another because of differences in such
traits as maturity, disease, and insect resistance. As
such, it can be advantageous to incorporate the nucleic
acid molecule into a large number of parental Erassica
lines so that many varieties can be produced containing
the desired nucleic acid molecule. This can conveniently
be done by breeding programs in which a conversion
process (back crossing) is performed by crossing the
initial transgenic fertile plant to normal elite inbred
21

CA 02440416 2003-09-04
WO 99/43202 PC'flUS99l04117
lines and then crossing the progeny back to the normal
parent. The progeny from this cross will segregate such
that some of the plants will carry the nucleic acid
molecule whereas some will not. The plants that do carry
the nucleic acid molecule are then crossed again to the
normal plant resulting in progeny that segregate once ~-
more. This crossing is repeated until the original
normal parent has been converted to a genetically
engineered line containing the nucleic acid molecule and
also possessing all other important attributes originally
found in the parent. A separate backcrossing program can
be used for every elite line that is to be converted to,a
genetically engineered elite line. It may be necessary
for both parents to be homozygous for the nucleic acid
IS molecule. Brassica breeding and the technique's and
sk-ills required-._.to t-r-a-n-s~-e~ genes--~r-om---one-_.l_3~~.0~-_._____.
_.._.._ _
variety to another are well-known to those skilled in the
art.
Uses of Transgenic Brassica Plants
Transgenic plants produced as described herein are
useful for a variety of commercial and research purposes.
Transgenic plants can be created for use in traditional
agriculture to possess traits beneficial to the grower
(e.g. agronomic traits such as pest resistance or
increased yield), beneficial to the consumer of the
product harvested from the plant (e.g. improved nutritive _
content in human food or animal feed), or beneficial to
the food processor (e. g. improved processing traits).
Chemical constituents such as oils and starches of
Brassica can be extracted for food or industrial use and
transgenic plants can be created to enhance or modify the
levels of such components. The plants can also be used
for seed production for a variety of purposes.
22

CA 02440416 2003-09-04
WO 99/43202 PCT/US99/04117
Transgenic plants can also find use in the


commercial manufacture of polypeptides or other molecules


encoded by the nucleic acid molecule contained therein, .


where-the expressed molecule of interest is extracted or


S purified from plant parts, seeds, and the like. In


addition, cells or tissue from transgenic plants can be


cultured, grown in vitro, or fermented to manufacture the.


desired molecules or for other purposes such as research.


The transgenic plants can also be used in


JO commercial breeding programs or can be crossed or bred to


plants of related crop species. Improvements encoded by


the nucleic acid molecule can be transferred from one


Brassica species to another Brassica species by, for


example, protoplast fusion.


IS Transgenic plants can have many uses in'research


__. - or. breeding,__including-area-t3-0n--off.-~e~u--mut.a~t--p~a~t-s-
___
_... _._.__.


through insertional mutagenesis, in order to identify


beneficial mutants that might later be created by


traditional mutation and selection. The methods of the


20 invention can also be used to create plants having unique


"signature sequences" or other marker sequences that can


be used to identify proprietary lines or varieties.


The invention will be further described in the


following examples, which do not limit the scope of the


25 invention described in the claims.


EXAMPLES
Transformed Brassica plants were generated by
particle bombardment using specific tissue preparation
procedures.
30 Example 1 - Brassica Transformation Using a S~icing
Tissue Preparation Method
Sterilized seeds of Brassica napus variety Westar
were grown on MS medium with agar and 30 mM CaCl2 to
23

CA 02440416 2003-09-04
WO 99/43202 PCT/US99I04117
germinate in the dark for 5-6 days. Seedlings at this


stage were 3-6 cm in height with shoot tips. The


advantage of using sterile seedlings as a tissue source


is that it requires minimal facility, time, and effort to


maintain the donor materials. The hypocotyls of these


seedlings were harvested and cut into pieces 2-3 cm in '.


length. Each hypocotyl piece was sliced longitudinally


into two halves and then placed on induction medium with


the epidermal side in contact with the medium, i.e., the


freshly cut surface was facing generally upward. The


induction medium was MS medium with 0.5 to 1.0 mg/liter


2,4-dichlorophenoxy acetic acid (2,4-D) and 0.2 to 0.3


mg/liter kinetin. The longitudinal slices were arranged


tightly together with about 20 pieces per dish. ~ After


being cultured for 1-2 days on induction medium, the


longitudinal sl-ices were--_bombarded-with--nucl~i~-aoir3----.__-
-.----..- --.


coated gold particles.


The nucleic acid molecule used to coat particles


for the bombardment and transformation of the non-embryo


Brassica cells was pIMC38 (Figure 1). This construct


contains two genes: neomycin phosphotransferase (NPTII)


gene and beta-glucuronidase (GUS) gene. Both genes were


driven by a CaMV 35S promoter and terminated with a


nopaline synthase (NOS) gene terminator. The 35S-NPTII-


NOS and 35S-GUS-NOS units were arranged in opposite


directions. The NPTII gene served as a selection marker


that, if properly expressed, confers resistance to


kanamycin on transferred cells in culture and renders


transformed seeds resistant to geneticin during


germination. -


The apparatus used to bombard non-embryo Brassica


cell or tissue preparations was a Biolistic' PDS-1000/He


System (Dupont). The procedure for the particle


bombardment followed the HioRad: US/EG Bulletin 1688 and



24

CA 02440416 2003-09-04
WO 99/43202 PCTIUS99/04117
1689. The specific metal particles used were 0.6 a or


1.0 ~ gold particles.


After being bombarded, the longitudinal slices


were cultured in induction medium for 3 days. The


cultures then were transferred to selection medium. The


selection medium was the same as the induction medium


except that the selection agent kanamycin was added to a


final concentration of 25 mg/liter. After 2-3 weeks, the


cultures were transferred to regeneration medium, which


contained 2 mg/liter zeatin, 0.1 mg/liter IAA, and 25


mg/liter kanamycin. These cells were sub-cultured on the


regeneration medium about every two weeks thereafter .


until green shoots appeared.


One of the regenerated plants was. selected-named -


"Peter") and analyzed for the presence of NPTII~nucleic


acid-. Specifically, leaf tissue was-collected from -


"Peter" and DNA was extracted from those cells and


analyzed by PCR using NPTII specific primers. This


analysis revealed that cells from "Peter" contained NPTII


nucleic acid (Table I) .


Regenerated plants were grown in a green house to


sexual maturity. Controlled pollination was carried out


between "Peter" and a non-transgenic commercial B. napus


variety Quantum. "Peter" was also self-pollinated.


R1 seeds were harvested from "Peter" and Fl seeds


were harvested from the Quantum X "Peter" cross, and


tested for geneticin resistance. Sterilized seeds were


placed into test medium that contained 1.2 g/liter bacto-


agar and 50 mg/liter or 100 mg/liter geneticin (Gibco-


- 30 LifeSciences, II811-023). The seeds were pushed into the


medium about 0.1 to 0.4 cm in depth after which the


germination status was measured weekly with a final score


being recorded after three weeks. The following


descriptions were used to score the germination status of


the seeds. Typically, when grown in 50 mg/liter



CA 02440416 2003-09-04
.
WO 99/4320? PCT/US99104117
geneticin test medium, non-transgenic seeds grow up to
1.5 cm in height, and have cotyledons that are green with
yellow to brown colored edges, but roots will not be more .
than 0.5 cm in length. In addition, non-transgenic seeds
S will not grow into viable seedlings after staying in the
50 mg/liter geneticin test medium for two weeks. Thus,
seeds that germinate into seedlings with green cotyledons
having a height greater than 2 cm and roots longer than 1
cm in 50 mg/liter geneticin test medium were defined as
NPTII positive. In addition, seeds that germinated in 50
mg/liter geneticin medium as quickly and normally as non-
transgenic seeds grown in geneticin-free medium were
marked as "++".
Table I. Analysis of regenerated plant "Peter", selfed
progeny (R1 and R~) , and crossed progeny (F1 and FZ) _._ _ _ _ _ _ _,
Plant PCR Seed Germination on
Generation (NPTII) Geneticin-containing
Medium
Ro positive N/A
R1 not tested ++
Fl not tested +
RZ positive ++
FZ not tested ++
++ = normal vigor, norma p anf~t morpk~ology; +-_
moderate vigor, normal plantlet morphology; N/A = not
applicable; F, = Quantum x Peter; Quantum is a non-
transgenic commercial B. Napus variety.
Some Rl seeds from the regenerated plant "Peter"
(Ro) germinated normally when grown on genet~icin-
containing medium, indicating the transformation of
Brassica (Table I). Some R1 seedlings that survived the
geneticin selection were transferred to soil, self-
pollinated, and RZ seeds harvested. Most of these Rz
seeds germinated and grew on geneticin-containing medium
normally and vigorously. F1 (Quantum x Peter) seeds
2f

CA 02440416 2003-09-04
WO 99/43202 PCT/US99I04117
germinated on geneticin-containing medium normally but


not as vigorously as the geneticin-resistant R1 or RZ


seeds. Thus, NPTII nucleic acid copy number and the


homozygous nature of the integrated NPTII nucleic acid


appeared to affect the level of NPTII expression. Some F,


seedlings that survived the geneticin selection were


transferred to soil self-pollinated and F~ seeds of


Quantum x Peter were harvested and tested. About half of


these F~ seeds germinated on geneticin-containing medium


normally and vigorously. NPTII specific PCR analysis on


R2 plants revealed a positive signal, confirming that


NPTII nucleic acid was integrated in "Peter." GUS


staining in all generations of "Peter", however, was


negative.


Example 2-- Brassi-ca--Transformat-ion- Usi-nu- a- Grinding


Tissue Preparation Method


Four to six day old sterile seedlings of Brassica


napus variety Westar were harvested and the lower portion


of the hypocotyls, seed coat, and roots were discarded.


The remaining upper portion of the seedling contained


10%-50% of the hypocotyl, two cotyledons, and a shoot


tip. This upper portion was ground with liquid induction


medium into a cellular slurry using a blender.


Specifically, the upper portion from about 200 seedlings


was mixed with 30 ml of induction medium. This mixture


was macerated in a blender (Blender Model 338L79, Warning


Products Division, Dynamics Corporation of America) at


room temperature. The resulting slurry was sorted


through a series of meshes into groups having different


ranges of tissue sizes. The group with a tissue size of


46-230 microns was collected and cultured at high density


on 12 filter films (4 cm diameter) that had been placed


on solid induction medium. After 3 days of culture,


films containing ground tissue were bombarded with


27

CA 02440416 2003-09-04
WO 99/43202 PCTIUS99/04117
nucleic acid molecule-coated gold particles as described
in Example 1 and cultured on induction medium for another
3 days. The cultures then were transferred to selection
medium for 2-3 weeks followed by culturing on


regenerating medium until shoots were regenerated.


Regenerated plants were analyzed for the presence =


NPTII nucleic acid as described in Example 1. In


addition, portions of such plants were analyzed for GUS


expression. Briefly, cells that express GUS appear blue


following a GUS staining assay. The GUS staining assay


used was described in detail by Anne-Marie Stopm iri Sean


R. Gallagher (ed.), GUS Protocols: Using the GUS Gene as


f
s


a Reporter o
Gene Expre
sion, pp. 103-113, Academic


Press.. San Diego, California, 1992._ Some regenerated


shoots and leaves showed strong blue color after GUS


staining ~ -indicat ing- the- -express-i-on--of - the transf
erred


foreign GUS nucleic acid sequences.


The regenerated plants were transferred to soil


and grown to maturity. Ten R1 seeds were tested for


geneticin resistance by the seed germination test


described in Example 1. Six failed to germinate. Two of


the four remaining seeds were geneticin resistance and


the resulting plantlets exhibited moderate vigor under



such conditions (Table II). In addition, 17 R, seeds were


germinated in the absence of geneticin and a leaf -piece


of each seedling was stained for GUS as described above.


Eleven of these exhibited strong blue color (Table II).


GUS staining and NPTII-specific PCR analysis on Rs plants


revealed positive signals. Taken together, these results


indicate that both the NPTII gene and the GUS gene were


integrated into the genome and successfully transmitted


to the progeny. ,


28

CA 02440416 2003-09-04
,
WO 99/43202 PCT/US99/0411~
Table II. Analysis of regenerated plants created using
the grinding method.
Plant GUS Germination on NPTII
Generation Staining Geneticin- specific PCR
containing Medium
$ Ro positive N/A not tested
R1 positive + not tested
Rz positive not tested positive
+ = mo erate vigor, normal p ant et morpho ogy; N A = not
applicable
~0 Example 3 - Transformation of Brassica iuncea
Brassica juncea line DZJ-O1 is a proprietary line
that has tissue culture and regeneration characteristics
- comparable to those-- of other Brassica j uncea lines . -_--Line -, -- -
DZJ-O1 was successfully transformed using the grinding
15. tissue . preparation method___descr-ibed..-irr- ExamplE...-2--.-.._- -___
Because DZJ-O1 tissue grew more rapidly in culture than
Brassica napus tissue, some culture conditions were
modified. Specifically, DZJ-01 tissue was prepared and
bombarded as described in Example 2. After bombardment,
20 the tissue was grown on solid induction medium for six
days. Cultures were then transferred to a floating raft
system and cultured in a liquid selection medium for
eight days, at which time the medium was changed to
liquid regeneration medium. These two liquid media had
2$ the same composition as the corresponding media as in
Example 2 except that agar was omitted. The floating
raft system included a LifeRaft Membrane Raft (Life
Technologies, Cat. No. 10518-017), a LifeRaft Float Unit
(Life Technologies Cat. No. 10521-011), and a Magenta
30 vessel with LifeGuard Membrane Vented Lid (Life
Technologies Cat. No. 10678-019) and was used as
described by the manufacturer.
The regeneration medium was renewed every week
until green shoot tips developed. After shoots had
29

CA 02440416 2003-09-04
WO 99/43202 PCT/US99104117
formed, they were transferred to solid regeneration
medium and then transferred to solid hormone-free MS
medium.
One of the regenerated plants (named "J.J.") '
exhibited a strong blue color in the GUS staining assay
described above. In addition, PCR analysis using GUS-
specific primers revealed strong positive signals
indicating that GUS specific sequences were present
(Table IIi). Taken together, these results suggest that
the introduced DNA was integrated into the genome of the
Ro plant. At sexual maturity, "J. J." was self-pollinated
and R1 seeds were harvested. To verify integration, R1
seeds were germinated and the resulting plantlets were
tested-for GUS expression. Some of the R, seedlings
IS exhibited strong blue color after GUS staining,
indicating--the--integrate-onwof the- GUSwgene into the--
Brassica juncea genome. In addition, GUS staining and
NPTII-specific PCR analysis on Rz plants revealed positive
signals, further confirming the integration of the GUS
and NPTII genes into the Brassica juncea genome.
Table III. Analysis of regenerated Brassica juncea
plants.
Plant GUS PCR PCR
Generation Staining (GUS) (NPTII)
Ro positive positive not tested
R1 positive not tested not tested
RZ positive not tested positive
OTHER EMBODIMENTS
It is to be understood that while the invention
has been described in conjunction with the detailed
description thereof, the foregoing description is
intended to illustrate and not limit the scope of the
invention, which is defined by the scope of the appended

CA 02440416 2003-09-04
WO 99/43202 PCTNS99/04117
claims. Other aspects, advantages, and modifications are
within the scope of the following claims.
31

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 2440416 was not found.

Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date Unavailable
(22) Filed 1999-02-25
(41) Open to Public Inspection 1999-09-02
Examination Requested 2003-09-04
Withdrawn Application 2012-02-15

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Request for Examination $400.00 2003-09-04
Registration of a document - section 124 $50.00 2003-09-04
Application Fee $300.00 2003-09-04
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 2 2001-02-26 $100.00 2003-09-04
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 3 2002-02-25 $100.00 2003-09-04
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 4 2003-02-25 $100.00 2003-09-04
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 5 2004-02-25 $150.00 2003-09-04
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 6 2005-02-25 $200.00 2005-02-07
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 7 2006-02-27 $200.00 2006-02-08
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 8 2007-02-26 $200.00 2007-02-06
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 9 2008-02-25 $200.00 2008-02-11
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 10 2009-02-25 $250.00 2009-02-25
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 11 2010-02-25 $250.00 2010-02-04
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 12 2011-02-25 $250.00 2011-01-19
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
CARGILL, INCORPORATED
Past Owners on Record
CELIO, JENNIFER
CHEN, ZHIZHENG
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Abstract 2003-09-04 1 42
Description 2003-09-04 32 1,520
Claims 2003-09-04 6 173
Drawings 2003-09-04 1 12
Cover Page 2003-11-06 1 30
Description 2004-10-05 32 1,512
Claims 2004-10-05 4 137
Description 2006-05-17 33 1,513
Claims 2006-05-17 2 37
Prosecution-Amendment 2005-04-26 1 43
Prosecution-Amendment 2008-10-30 4 165
Correspondence 2003-10-03 1 41
Assignment 2003-09-04 6 253
Prosecution-Amendment 2003-09-04 4 140
Correspondence 2003-11-07 1 15
Prosecution-Amendment 2004-03-17 1 24
Prosecution-Amendment 2004-04-06 3 104
Prosecution-Amendment 2004-10-05 9 341
Prosecution-Amendment 2007-05-07 4 171
Prosecution-Amendment 2004-12-01 1 35
Prosecution-Amendment 2005-11-22 4 148
Prosecution-Amendment 2006-05-17 9 286
Prosecution-Amendment 2006-11-07 4 154
Prosecution-Amendment 2011-07-26 4 175
Prosecution-Amendment 2008-04-30 3 148
Prosecution-Amendment 2009-01-09 2 100
Correspondence 2009-02-19 1 31
Fees 2009-02-25 1 76
Prosecution-Amendment 2011-06-02 2 128
Prosecution-Amendment 2010-12-29 7 248
Prosecution-Amendment 2011-09-13 2 91
Correspondence 2011-12-14 1 30
Correspondence 2012-02-15 1 45
Prosecution-Amendment 2012-02-20 1 13