Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
CA 02440763 2003-09-15
WO 02/076424 PCT/GB02/01384
1
LIQUID FORMATIONS FOR ELECTROHYDRODYNAMIC SPRAYING CONTAINING POLYMER AND
SUSPENDED PARTICLES
This invention relates to formulations for use in
electrohydrodynamic processing.
Electrohydrodynamic (EHD) processing is described in
detail in, for example, GB-A-1569707. In this process,
a dispersed spray or cloud of droplets which are all of
substantially the same size (monodispersed) is produced
by subjecting liquid emerging from an outlet or nozzle
to an electric field.
Many applications for electrohydrodynamic processing have
been proposed. One example which takes advantage of the
monodispersed nature of the mist or cloud of droplets is
the field of inhalers. In this field,
electrohydrodynamic processing enables control over the
size of droplets (by for example, controlling the liquid
flow rate and/or applied voltage) which, in combination
with the monodispersed nature of the mist or cloud,
enables targeting more accurately of the droplets to a
specific part of the respiratory system. An example of
a nasal inhaler is described in WO 00/35524. Another
application of electrohydrodynamic processing is in the
topical application of medicaments or wound dressings as
described in, for example, WO 98/03267.
In one aspect, the present invention provides a method
of controlling the characteristics of a cloud or spray
of droplets produced by electrohydrodynamic processing
CA 02440763 2003-09-15
WO 02/076424 PCT/GB02/01384
2
by controlling the formulation of the liquid used in the
electrohydrodynamic processing.
In one aspect the present invention provides a
formulation for use in electrohydrodynamic processing,
wherein the formulation comprises a liquid comprising a
polymer and particulate material in suspension within the
liquid.
In another aspect, the present invention provides a
formulation for use in electrohydrodynamic processing,
wherein the liquid comprises a polymer and, in addition
to any active ingredient, particulate material suspended
within the liquid.
The liquid may be, for example, a polymer melt or
polymer solution.
In one aspect, the present invention provides a
formulation for use in electrohydrodynamic (EHD)
processing, wherein the formulation comprises a liquid
comprising a solvent such as ethanol, a polymer and
particulate material comprising at least particles of a
substantially inert material such as, for example, sugar,
starch, polymer beads.
As used herein, the term "substantially inert material"
refers to a material that does not form an active
ingredient of the formulation, that is, although the
substantially inert material may have an effect in use
CA 02440763 2003-09-15
WO 02/076424 PCT/GB02/01384
3
of a cloud or spray of droplets resulting from the EHD
processing, that effect is not the intended effect of the
formulation. Where the resulting cloud or spray of
droplets is intended to be inhaled or applied topically
to a human or animal body, then the substantially inert
material should be biologically compatible material. As
used herein, "biologically compatible" means that the
material does not have an unintended significant adverse
effect when droplets produced by EHD processing from a
formulation containing that inert material are inhaled
or applied topically in the intended manner.
In one aspect, the present invention provides a
formulation for use in electrohydrodynamic processing
when the formulation comprises a liquid solution
comprising PVP in ethanol with particulate material in
the form of sugar, starch or polymer beads suspended
within the liquid.
Embodiments of the present invention will now be
described, by way of example, with reference to the
accompanying drawings, in which:
Figure 1 shows a schematic diagram of apparatus for
carrying out electrohydrodynamic processing;
Figure 2 shows a graph of stability against polymer
concentration to illustrate the change in spraying
characteristics when particulate material in suspension
is incorporated into the formulation;
Figures 3a, b and c show photographs illustrating
the spraying characteristics observed during EHD
CA 02440763 2003-09-15
WO 02/076424 PCT/GB02/01384
4
processing for zones a, b and c shown in Figure 2 for a
formulation that does not contain particulate material
in suspension;
Figures 4a, b and c show photographs similar to
Figures 3a, 3b and 3c, respectively, but for the case
where the formulation incorporates particulate material
in suspension;
Figures 5a and 5b show bar charts illustrating the
effects on droplets spread and maximum flow rate,
respectively, of suspending a first inert particulate
material within a formulation for different
concentrations of a first polymer within the formulation;
Figures 6a and 6b show bar charts similar to Figures
5a and 5b, respectively, for a formulation incorporating
a second, different, polymer;
Figures 7a and 7b show bar charts similar to Figures
6a and 6b, respectively, for a formulation incorporating
the same polymer but showing the effect of suspending a
second different inert material within the formulation;
Figures 8a and 8b show bar charts similar to Figures
5a and 5b, respectively, where the formulation
incorporates a third different polymer to show the effect
of suspending the second inert particulate material
within that polymer;
Figures 9a and 9b show bar charts similar to Figures
8a and 8b, respectively, where the formulation
incorporates another polymer;
Figures 10a and lOb show photographs illustrating
the spraying characteristics of a formulation comprising
glycerol with Figure 10a showing the spraying
CA 02440763 2003-09-15
WO 02/076424 PCT/GB02/01384
characteristics without incorporation of a particulate
suspension and Figure 10b showing the effect of
incorporation of particulate suspension;
Figures 11a and 11b show photographs illustrating
5 the spraying characteristics of a formulation comprising
ethylcellulose with Figure 11a showing the spraying
characteristics without incorporation of a particulate
suspension and Figure 11b showing the effect of
incorporation of a particulate suspension; and
Figure 12 shows a diagrammatic view (with a housing
cut-away) of a dispensing device for dispensing a
formulation by EHD processing.
Referring now to the drawings, Figure 1 shows a very
diagrammatic drawing of EHD processing apparatus used in
the experiments to be described below. As shown in
Figure 1, the EHD processing apparatus comprises a
reservoir 1 from which the formulation to be subject to
electrohydrodynamic processing is pumped via a pump 2 to
a metal capillary tube 3 having an outlet 3a. The metal
capillary tube is coupled to a high voltage source 4
which, in this example, supplies a voltage in the range
of 7 to 8 kilovolts. The outlet 3a is positioned above
an earthed (grounded) metal plate 5 which, in this
example, is 1.5~cm below the outlet 3a.
As will be described below, experiments were carried out
using formulations consisting of different concentrations
of different polymers dissolved in a solvent both with
and without the incorporation of a suspension of inert
CA 02440763 2003-09-15
WO 02/076424 PCT/GB02/01384
6
particulate material. The voltage applied by the high
voltage source 4 was kept within a constant range in
order to isolate the effects of flow rate on the
electrostatic processing. The droplet spread or swath
angle a and the maximum flow rate for stable droplet
formulation were examined for the various different
formulations as will be described below. The swath angle
a (that is the angle a subtended at the nozzle 3a by the
deposition pattern produced on the metal plate 5
(assuming that deposition pattern is roughly circular))
was determined at a formulation flow rate of 7.2 ml per
hour ( 2 microlitres per second ) by examining the droplets
spread on.the earthed plate 5 microscope. Photographs
of the spraying characteristics were taken using a
digital camera.
Figure 2 shows a graph for illustrating the effects of
addition of polymer and suspended inert particulate
material to a solvent or liquid mixture which, on its
own, will not form a stable cone and jet to enable EHD
processing because it is too highly electrically
conductive.
Figure 2 shows a graph of increasing stability rating
against increased polymer concentration with line X
showing the change in sprayability with increasing
polymer concentration of a formulation that does not
contain suspended particulate material and line Y showing
the change in sprayability with increasing polymer
concentration of a formulation containing suspended
CA 02440763 2003-09-15
WO 02/076424 PCT/GB02/01384
7
particulate material. The stability of the spray produced
by EHD processing was assessed visually and determined
by two parameters, the swath angle a and the maximum flow
rate for which droplet production occurs.
Line X in Figure 2 shows that the EHD spraying
characteristics of the polymer formulation without
suspended particulate material has three characteristic
zones, zones A, B and C. In zone A, when the polymer
concentration is still very low, spitting is observed
from an unstable cone jet. However, as the polymer
concentration is increased, the spraying becomes
increasingly more stable. Figure 3a shows a photograph
illustrating spraying characteristics in zone A.
In zone B, stable spraying is observed with relatively
little change in stability with increasing polymer
concentration. Figure 3b shows a photograph illustrating
the spraying characteristics in zone B.
In zone C, the further increasing concentration of
polymer causes an increase in viscosity inhibiting
breaking up of the jet into droplets and resulting in a
continuous stream of liquid. Figure 3c shows a photograph
illustrating spraying conditions in zone C.
It can thus be seen from line X, in Figure 2 and the
photographs shown in Figures 3a to 3c that the addition
of polymer to a normally unsprayable liquid can make that
liquid sprayable but that the stability of the EHD
CA 02440763 2003-09-15
WO 02/076424 PCT/GB02/01384
8
processing or spraying is very much dependent upon the
polymer concentration.
Line Y in Figure 2 shows the effect of suspending inert
particulate material within the formulation and Figures
4a, b and c show the spraying characteristics observed
for polymer concentration regions corresponding to zones
A, B and C in Figure 2. As can be seen from Figure 2 and
the photographs shown in Figures 4a, b and c, the
incorporation of the suspended particulate material into
the formulation does not significantly affect the
stability of the EHD spraying in the region of zone B.
However, the incorporation of the suspended particulate
material markedly increases.the stability in zones A and
C, making the stability to EHD spraying of the
formulation much less sensitive to the concentration of
polymer within the formulation enabling, for example, a
lower concentration of polymer to be used if desired. In
addition, generally; the swath angle a increased when
particulate material was suspended in the formelation,
especially in those formulations having a lower polymer
concentration. In each example, either an equivalent
or increased flow rate was achieved by the addition of
the suspended particulate material. In addition,
increasing the amount of particulate material suspended
within the formulation showed a similar or larger
increase in both swath angle a and maximum obtainable
flow rate for stable spraying.
CA 02440763 2003-09-15
WO 02/076424 PCT/GB02/01384
9
Various experiments from which the graph shown in Figure
2 was derived will now be described in detail.
Example 1
In this example, the formulation consisted of
polyvinylpyrrolidone of molecular weight 40000 (PVP 40k)
dissolved in ethanol ( EtOH ) with and without the addition
of inert particulate material in the form of sugar.
Experiments were carried out for polymer concentrations
ranging from 40 mg (milligrams) of PVP 40k per ml
(millilitre) of ethanol ( that is 4.0 mg of PVP 40k added
to each ml of ethanol) to over 520 mg of PVP 40k per ml
of ethanol: 1) without any inert particulate material;
2) with a low concentration of sugar (0.1 grams per ml
of ethanol); and 3) with a relatively high concentration
of sugar (0.5 grams per ml of ethanol).
Figure 5a shows a bar chart of droplet spread (i.e. the
diameter or average width of the droplet deposition
2 0 pattern on the earthed plate ) measured in cm as described
above against polymer concentration for these three cases
which Figure 5b shows a bar chart of maximum flow rate
in ml/hr against polymer concentration for these cases
with a voltage drop of 4.7 kV per cm, that is with the
voltage applied by the high voltage source being about
7 kV as in the example described above. The white bars
show the results obtained for the formulation without
particulate material, the vertical stripe bars show the
results obtained for the formulation with the relatively
low concentration of inert particulate material and the
CA 02440763 2003-09-15
WO 02/076424 PCT/GB02/01384
horizontal stripe bars show the results obtained for the
formulation having the relatively high concentration of
inert particulate material.
5 As can be seen from Figures 5a and 5b, the higher the
concentration of PVP 40k in the formulation, the more
sprayable the formulation becomes. Morever, suspending
inert particulate material within the formulation
improves the sprayability of those formulations with a
10 polymer concentration from 40mg per ml of ethanol to 180
mg per ml of ethanol. (The arrows in Figure 5b indicate
that the maximum flow rate for a particulate formulation
has not been reached within the tested range, that is at
16 ml per hour the resultant spray was still so stable
that stability could be expected to be maintained for
even higher flow rates.)
The maximum obtainable flow rate can be seen from Figure
5b to increase with increasing concentration of inert
2'0 particulate material with the largest increase in maximum
obtainable flow rate occurring for polymer concentrations
in the range 40 mg per ml of ethanol to 180 mg per ml of
ethanol, which corresponds to zone A shown in Figure 2.
For polymer concentrations in the range 180 mg per ml of
ethanol to 320 mg per ml of ethanol (corresponding to zone
B in Figure 2), the addition of polymer alone is
sufficient to stabilise spraying and the effect of
addition of the suspended particulate material is less
clearly defined. For polymer concentrations from 320 mg
CA 02440763 2003-09-15
WO 02/076424 PCT/GB02/01384
11
per ml of ethanol to 560 mg per ml of ethanol
(corresponding to zone C in Figure 2), the formulation
without the suspended particulate material becomes
progressively less sprayable as the increasing viscosity
collapses the jet into a stream (as can be seen from
Figure 3c). Fox these high viscosity formulations, the
addition of the solid particulate material restores the
spread of the jet making atomisation by
electrohydrodynamic processing possible as can be seen
by comparing Figures 3c and 4c. Within this higher
viscosity range, the maximum obtainable flow rate was not
significantly affected by the addition of the particulate
material. At very high concentrations of polymer (520mg
per ml of ethanol and 560 mg per ml of ethanol), the jet
tended to collapse into a stream, regardless of the
addition of solid particulate material.
Example 2
In this example, the formulation consisted of PVP 360k
(that is PVP of 360,000 molecular weight) dissolved in
ethanol with and without the incorporation of suspended
particulate material in the form of sugar, again at both
high and low concentrations. Figures 6a and 6b show bar
charts similar to Figures 5a and 5b respectively, to
illustrate the change in droplet spread and maximum flow
rate for concentrations of PVP 360k ranging from 1 mg per
ml of ethanol to 45 mg per ml of ethanol with the white
bars again showing the results obtained without suspended
particulate material in the formulation, the vertical
stripe bars showing the results obtained from .a
CA 02440763 2003-09-15
WO 02/076424 PCT/GB02/01384
12
formulation incorporating a low concentration of sugar,
(again 0.1 grams per ml of ethanol) and the horizontal
stripe bars showing the results for a relatively high
concentration of sugar (again 0.5 grams per ml of
ethanol). Again, the droplet spread shown in Figure 6a
was measured with a flow rate of 7.2 ml per hour and the
maximum obtainable flow rate shown in Figure 6a was
measured at a field strength of 4.7 kV per cm.
Example 3
Example 3 differs from example 2 in that the sugar was
replaced by starch as the particulate material. Again,
experiments were carried out with both a low
concentration (0.1 grams per ml of ethanol) and a high
concentration (0.5 grams per ml of ethanol) of starch
particulates suspended in the formulation. Again, the
white bar show results obtained without particulate
material, the vertical stripe bars show results obtained
with a low concentration of particulate material
suspended in the formulation and the horizontal stripe
bars show the results obtained with a high concentration
of particulate material suspended in the formulation.
As can be seen from Figures 6a to 7b, the EHD processing
characteristics of the formulation improved with the
addition of suspended particulate material (either sugar
or starch) as the polymer concentration was increased to
2 mg per ml of ethanol(corresponding to zone A in Figure
2). with polymer concentrations of 4 mg per ml of
ethanol and 6 mg per ml of ethanol (corresponding to zone
CA 02440763 2003-09-15
WO 02/076424 PCT/GB02/01384
13
B in Figure 2) stable spraying was achieved. Above 6 mg
per ml of.ethanol(corresponding to zone C in Figure 2),
the spray rapidly collapsed in those formulations which
did not contain suspended particulate material. The
largest.increases in maximum obtainable flow rate as a
result of incorporation of suspended particulate material
occurred at higher polymer concentrations (10 mg per ml
of ethanol to 45 mg per ml of ethanol). As can be seen
from Figure 6a and 7a, the incorporation of particulate
material in suspension significantly increased the
droplets spread or swath angle and the presence of the
solid particulates in suspension was beneficial across
the whole range of polymer concentrations. An upper
limit was reached at 45 mg of. polymer per ml of ethanol
because, with such a high concentration of polymer, the
EHD processing resulted in fibre production rather than
droplet production, regardless of whether or not solid
particulate material suspended in the formulation.
Example 4
In this example, the polymer used was a low viscosity
ethylcellulose formulation consisting of 5% by volume
ethylcellulose in a 80:20 by volume toluene: ethanol
mixture and having a viscosity of 15 centipoise (cp) at
25 degrees Celsius. This ethylcellulose formulation is
referred to herein as loethylcellulose (loEC). Four
different polymer formulations were provided with the
ethylcellulose formulation in two different
concentrations in ethanol (20 mg per ml of ethanol. and
100 mg per ml of ethanol) and in two different
CA 02440763 2003-09-15
WO 02/076424 PCT/GB02/01384
14
concentrations (20 mg per ml of solvent and 100 mg per
ml of solvent) in a solvent consisting of a 3:7 by volume
mix of ethanol: water (EtOH:HzO). The experiments were
carried out with each of these formulations without any
particulate material suspended in the formulation and
with 0.5 grams of starch particulate material per ml of
solvent (ethanol or ethanol:water) suspended in the
formulation. Again, Figures 8a and 8b show the droplets
spread and maximum flow rates, respectively, with the
droplet spread being obtained at a flow rate of 7.2 ml
per hour and the maximum obtainable flow rate being
observed at a field strength of 4.7 kV per cm. In Figures
8a and 8b, the white bars show the results obtained
without starch in suspension while the horizontal stripe
bars show the results obtained when the formulation
incorporated the starch.
As can be seen from Figure 8a, the incorporation of
particulate material in suspension significantly
increased the droplet spread for the formulations having
the lower concentration (20 mg per ml of solvent) of
polymer and also significantly improved the maximum flow
rate for those concentrations.
Example 5
In this example, the polymer used was again an
ethylcellulose formulation, in this case a high viscosity
formulation consisting of Ethocel (trade name) Standard
100 Premium Ethylcellulose (supplied by the Dow Chemical
Company) having a viscosity of 100cp at 25 degrees
CA 02440763 2003-09-15
WO 02/076424 PCT/GB02/01384
Celsius. This polymer is referred to herein as
,,;,ethylcellulose (,,iEC ) . The solvent was ethanol . Two
different polymer concentration formulations were tested,
a first polymer concentration with 8 mg of polymer per
5 ml of ethanol and a second concentration with 40 mg of
polymer per ml of ethanol. In addition, these two
polymer formulations were tested both with and without
the incorporation of starch particulates in suspension.
Where the suspension was added, the concentration of
10 particulate was 0.5 grams per ml of ethanol. The white
bars in Figures 9a and 9b show the results obtained where
the formulation did not contain the starch particulate
material in suspension while the horizontal stripe bars
show the results obtained when the formulation
15 incorporated the suspended particulate material.
As can be seen from Figure 9b, the maximum obtainable
f low rate was increased when solids were added to the
lower polymer concentration formulation and continued to
be large for the higher polymer concentration
formulation, regardless of the addition of solid
particulate material.
Example 6
Table 1 shows the results of experiments carried out with
different glycerol formulations with and without the
incorporation of inert particles in the form of 1 um
(micrometre) diameter polytetrafluorethylene beads
("PTFE" in the table) or 30 um glass beads ("glass" in
the table).
CA 02440763 2003-09-15
WO 02/076424 PCT/GB02/01384
16
TABLE 1
Formula Voltage Spread Sprayability,
(kV) (cm) (7.2m1/hr; or 15 ml/hr)
100 glycerol 6.3-8.0 0.5 streaming
100 glycerol- 6.83-9.0 1 outer=solids; inner=liquid
10~ glass
90~ glycerol- >5.9 0.5 streaming
10~ EtOH
90~ glycerol- 7.0-8.0 0.8 outer=solids; inner=liquid
10~ EtOH-
10~ PTFE
80~ glycerol- >6.3 0.5 streaming
2 0 ~ EtOH
80~ glycerol- 6.0-8.0 1 outer=solids; inner=liquid
20~ EtOH-
10~ PTFE
2 0 70~ glycerol- 5.0-8.5 0.5 streaming
30~ EtOH
70~ glycerol- 5.3-9.7 0.6 outer=solids; inner=liquid;
30~ EtOH- larger spread (l.lcm)
10~ PTFE @ 15 ml/hr
50~ glycerol- 6.0-9.0 0.7 outer=solids; inner=liquid;
50~ EtOH larger spread (l.2cm)
@ 15 ml/hr
50$ glycerol- 5.0-8.0 1.5 sprays well; larger spread
50~ EtOH- (l.7cm) @ 15 ml/hr
3 0 10 ~ PTFE
Due the highly viscous nature of the solutions
illustrated by Table 1, clearly defined zones A, B and
C could not be determined. As illustrated in Table 1 and
by the photograph shown in Figure 10a, streaming occurred
CA 02440763 2003-09-15
WO 02/076424 PCT/GB02/01384
17
for all ratios of glycerol to ethanol tested within the
bounds for providing sustainable suspension. However,
upon adding approximately 10% by volume loading of inert
particles (glass or PTFE beads), an enhancement in the
sprayability of the formulations was noted as well as an
increase in the swath angle as shown by the photograph
shown in Figure 10b. In these cases, the spray comprised
an outer mist of finer droplets with an inner mist of
larger less mobile droplets so that the deposition
pattern on the earth plate consisted of outer discrete
droplets (outer=solids in Table 1) with an inner
coalesced liquid region (inner=liquid in Table 1)
resulting from, for example, agglomeration of some
particulates reducing their lateral mobility and/or the
high viscosity of the liquid impeding the free movement
of individual particles . In support of the second theory,
a larger increase in swath angle was achieved with a
larger percentage of ethanol in the formulation.
Example 7
Table 2 shows the effect of adding inert particulate
material in suspension to a polymer formulation
consisting of ,,iethylcellulose (,,iEC ) at a concentration
of 60mg per ml of ethanol and 80 mg per ml of ethanol.
In this case, the inert particulate material suspended
in the formulation comprise 30 ~Cm (micrometre) inert
glass beads suspended at a concentration of 0.1 grams per
ml of ethanol.
TABLE 2
CA 02440763 2003-09-15
WO 02/076424 PCT/GB02/01384
18
Formula Voltage SpreadSprayability
(kV) (cm) (7.2m1/hr; or 15
ml/hr)
niEC(60mg)+ EtOH (1m1) 5.95 1.2 good spray
niEC(60mg)+ EtOH (1m1) 4.79-5 1.5 spreads out more
+
glass (0.1g)
n;,EC(80mg)+ EtOH (1m1)7.56 0.8 one moving jet
niEC ( 80mg )+ EtOH '7 . 1 . good spray
( lml ) 5 5
plus glass (0.1g)
As can be seen from Table 2, incorporating the inert
particulate material into the polymer formulation
increased the swath angle for the lower polymer
concentration formulation and for the higher polymer
concentration increased the stability of the spraying.
Figures 11a and llb show the spray characteristics for
the 80 mg per ml formulation without and with suspended
particulate material. As can be seen from Table 2 and
Figures lla and llb incorporation of the particulate
material improves the EHD spraying characteristics.
It will, of course, be appreciated that the formulations
described above where the inert particulate material
comprises glass beads will generally not be used for
inhalation or topical application to a body surface.
However, the fact that the effects (increased maximum
flow rate and increased swath angle) are observed when
using glass particles and polymer beads means that these
CA 02440763 2003-09-15
WO 02/076424 PCT/GB02/01384
19
effects should be observed with almost any biologically
compatible inert material that can be suspended within
the formulation.
The particulate material maybe maintained in suspension
in any suitable manner known to those skilled in the art .
For example, the reservoir may incorporate a mechanical
or other stirrer that maintains the suspension. As
another possibility, the formulation may include a
viscosity enhancer such as glycerol, gum arabic or a
cellulose polymer derivative such as
hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (HPMC),
hydroxypropylcellulose (HPC) or carboxymethylcellulose
(CMC) or hydroxyethylcellulose (HEC). Other ways of
maintaining suspensions are described at for example,
pages 50 to 59 of the text book entitled "Solid/Liquid
Dispersions" edited by Tadros, Th.F. Academic Press 1987.
As another possibility, a polymeric surfactant such as
one of the ATLOX series of polymeric surfactants
described in the~Uniqema Technical Bulletin 00-4 may be
used to maintain the suspension.
As will be seen from the above examples, suspension of
inert particulate material in a polymer formulation,
facilitates electrohydrodynamic processing of the
formulation, enabling stable spraying at higher flow
rates and providing an increased swath angle so that, for
a given distance of the outlet 3a from the deposition
surface, the resultant spray covers a larger area of the
target surface.
CA 02440763 2003-09-15
WO 02/076424 PCT/GB02/01384
Figure 12 shows a very diagrammatic cut away view of one
example of a dispenser 200 that may be used to effect
electrohydrodynamic processing of the formulations
described above. As can be seen in Figure 12 the
5 dispenser comprises a housing 20 having a first chamber
21 containing a voltage source 22 such as a battery
coupled via a switch SW to a high voltage generator 23
and to a pump 24 which is coupled to a liquid formulation.
reservoir 25 to pump formulation from the reservoir to
10 a tube (shown part cut-away) having an outlet 30a. The
tube 30 extends from the first chamber 21 into a second
chamber 26 including a dispensing outlet 20a of the
housing. In this example, the tube 30 is electrically
insulating and carries an electrode 31 which is coupled
15 to a =high voltage output line 23a of the high voltage
generator. A conductive core or rod 32 supported within
the liquid outlet tube 30 is coupled to the earth or
negative terminal of the voltage source 22 via line 22a.
20 In operation of this dispensing device when the switch
SW is.activated, an electric field is generated between
the first and second electrodes 31 and 32 and liquid
formulation is pumped from the reservoir 25 to the liquid
outlet 30a by the pump 24. Liquid issuing from the outlet
30a is thus subject to a high electric field as described
above resulting in electrohydrodynamic comminution of the .
liquid to produce a cloud or mist of droplets which exit
the device via the dispensing outlet 20a.
CA 02440763 2003-09-15
WO 02/076424 PCT/GB02/01384
21
Incorporation of suspended particulate material within
the formulation as described above enables higher flow
rates so that a larger dose of medicament can be
delivered within a given time and also enables, as
described above, an increased swath angle thereby
facilitating closer range spraying.
The dispensing device may be designed as a nasal inhaler,
in which case the formulation will also contain an active
ingredient to be delivered via the nasal passages. The
active ingredient may be a medicament for use in the
treatment by way of therapy, surgery or diagnosis of an
animal body such as a human being or otherwise to improve
quality of life. The medicament may be an antibiotic,
anti-cancer agent, or other pharmaceutical product, a
vaccine, a protein, an enzyme, DNA or DNA fragments or
other biological products, ~an anti-inflammatory, a
vitamin, an antiseptic, morphine or other pain killing
drug, nicotine and so on. Further, examples of dispensing
devices in the form of nasal inhalers that may be used
to dispense the above formulations are described in
WO 00/35524.
As another example, the dispensing device may be designed
to enable topical application of an active ingredient to
a body surface, such as an area of skin, or a wound
surface. In this case, the increased swath angle enables
topical application over a wider area.
CA 02440763 2003-09-15
WO 02/076424 PCT/GB02/01384
22
WO 98/03267 describes examples of other dispensing
devices that may be used to dispense a formulation in
accordance with the present invention.
The dispensing device, may as another possibility, be
designed to deliver a cloud or spray in which the active
ingredient is a pesticide or other garden product with,
again, the increased swath angle provided by the
incorporation of the suspended particulate material
enabling the device to be positioned closer to the area
to be sprayed (for example, a leaf surface) while still
maintaining the desired coverage area, so facilitating
and ensuring that the active ingredient carried by the
cloud or droplet spray is deposited onto the desired
target surface.
Further examples of electrohydrodynamic comminution
devices that may be used to dispense a formulation in
accordance with the present invention are described in,
for example, WO 94/12285, WO 94/14543, WO 95/26235,
WO 00/35524, WO 99/07478 and WO 00/03267, the whole
contents of each of which are hereby incorporated by
reference.
The particulate material may be formed of any one or more
of a number of different types of materials with the only
constraint being that the particulate material is
biologically compatible and is substantially insoluble
in and can be suspended in the polymer formulation.
Examples of types of particulate material are: chalk or
CA 02440763 2003-09-15
WO 02/076424 PCT/GB02/01384
23
kaolin particles or particles of another biologically
compatible polymer that is insoluble in the polymer
formulation; where the dosage form is for~oral delivery,
flavourings such as sweeteners both artificial and
natural (such as simple and complex sugars)' and/or
effervescent particles, that is particles that effervesce
in the mouth but not in the polymer formulation;
particles of active ingredient. All of these types of
particles may be solid, hollow or porous. Other types
~ of particles that may be used include: micro capsules
(formed of, for example, another biologically compatible
polymer that is insoluble in the polymer formulation);
that are inert ( i . a . contain air, gas or an inert liquid )
or contain an active ingredient or ingredients in solid,
granular, liquid or gel form; polymer particles having
dissolved or dispersed therein an active ingredient;
particles of active ingredient coated with a coating
material that is insoluble in the polymer formulation
such as another biologically compatible polymer. Any one
or more of these types of particles may be used and,
where the particles are or incorporate an active
ingredient one or more different active ingredients may
be used, depending upon the properties required of the
dosage form. The particles may be of the same size (mono-
dispersed) or may have a range of sizes, may be smaller
than 1 mm in.diameter (assuming a generally spherical
shape) and typically may have a diameter or diameters in
the range from sub micron to 100 microns. The~particles
need not necessarily be spherical but could be
CA 02440763 2003-09-15
WO 02/076424 PCT/GB02/01384
24
ellipsoidal, granular, shard-like or .rod-like, for
example.
As another possibility, at least a proportion of the
suspended particulate material may comprise active
ingredient. The incorporation of the active ingredient
into the formulation as a particulate suspension
facilitates delivery by electrohydrodynamic processing
of active ingredients in the form of salts which, due to
their polar nature, could not generally be delivered by
electrohydrodynamic processing if dissolved within the
formulation because the resulting solution would be too
highly conductive.
In the above described examples, the solvent used is
ethanol or an ethanol-water mixture, other solvents may
be used. Also, other biologically compatible polymers
may be used. In addition, the polymer formulation need
not necessarily be a solution but could be a polymer
melt in which case, of course, the particulate material
should remain solid and not itself melt within the molten
polymer. The particulate material may be designed to
degrade, dissolve or disintegrate during use, for example
after inhalation or topical application. As an example,
the particulate material may comprise a biodegradable or
dissolvable polymer, which remains solid in the polymer
formulation but, after EHD processing, for example after
inhalation or topical application, degrades or dissolves.
Making the particulate material hollow as discussed above
30' may facilitate this.
CA 02440763 2003-09-15
WO 02/076424 PCT/GB02/01384
Suspending an active ingredient within the formulation
not only enables active ingredients that could not
otherwise be sprayed (because their aqueous solutions are
too electrically conductive) but also enables the
5 possibility of ensuring that the active ingredient is not
present in droplets below a certain size (determined by
the 'particulate size). This may be particularly
advantageous where the formulation is to be dispensed
from an inhaler because it should ensure that non
10 fraction of the active ingredient will be carried to the
respiratory system in satellite droplet form.
Formulations in accordance with the present invention may
also enable effective localisation of the particulate
15 matter evenly over a target surface by virtue of the
"sticky" action of the polymer which may facilitate
delivery of active ingredient where the suspended
particulate material includes active ingredient.
20 In a formulation embodying the invention, the addition
of a polymer increases the formulation viscosity, thereby
increasing the shelf life of the suspension. As described
above, increased flow rate is achieved firstly by adding
the polymer and secondly by adding the particulate
25 material in suspension. As seen from the above, the
addition of polymer and particulate material in
suspension enables some liquids that would otherwise not
be sprayable by electrohydrodynamic processing to be made
sprayable and moreover increases the swath or deposition
angle of the droplets thereby facilitating closer range
CA 02440763 2003-09-15
WO 02/076424 PCT/GB02/01384
26
spraying of viscous liquid. The particulate material may
be suspended in the formulation in any conventional
manner and need not be micronised because the buffering
effect of the polymer during spraying ensures that the
cone jet is not disrupted by even relatively large
suspended particles. In addition, the spraying
characteristics are not significantly adversely affected
even with poorly distributed and poorly separated solids
in the suspension.
