Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
CA 02444464 2003-10-15
TITLE: Method and Apparatus for Locating the Trajectory of a Projectile in
Motion.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to a detection system for locating the position and
trajectory in space of moving objects. More particularly, it relates to a
rapid-response
system fox detecting projectiles against which defensive measures may be
taken.
BACKGROUND TO THE INVENTION
Numerous systems exist for detecting objects traveling in space. These are
primarily based upon optical, infrared, and microwave transmissions. Such
systems may
be either passive or active. In the case of active systems, a source of
illumination
projects an electromagnetic wave outwardly, and reflections from the subject
object are
sensed in a detector.
Particularly in military applications, it is necessary to establish the
position and
trajectory of objects in a very short period of time. An example of this rapid-
reaction
requirement is the field of active armour. An early active armour system is
identified in
US patent US 3,893,369. Another example of this rapid-reaction requirement is
the
identification of the location of the path for incoming projectiles. This type
of system is
identified in US patents US 4,765,244; US 5,578,784, and US 6,279,449.
Further, a
projectiles origin may be determined by projecting its trajectory back to its
source.
Active armour systems should be able to address threats traveling at 200 m!s
up
to 2000 m/s and aimed at the front, sides or top of a vehicle. Further, such
systems
should be effective when the vehicle moves through rough terrain at up to 70
km/h.
In the active armour application the necessary operations include:
1
CA 02444464 2003-10-15
-Detect, identify and track an incoming threat by way of a sensor suit
-Calculate intended impact point on vehicle
-Select appropriate countermeasure
-Determine collision point in space and time between threat and countermeasure
-Fire countermeasure to intercept the incoming projectile
The sensor system of the invention provides the critical sensor suite that
allows the
incoming threat to be located and tracked so that an effective interception
can be made.
Imaging systems can form an image of an object on a planar surface, as in the
case of a charged coupled device, CCD, employed in a video camera. Such planar
images require time to sample all of the pixels available in an x,y array.
Simpler imaging
systems utilize a linear array that provides a far smaller number of pixel
sensors. The
sampling time is accordingly substantially reduced. However, such known linear
arrays
can only sample a planar surface in space, viewed edge-on.
Such linear arrays can be provided with directed pixel sensors, aligned to
divide
the surface of the viewing plane into a discrete number of viewing sectors.
Thus a 90
degree field of view divided amongst S 12 directed pixel sensors will allow
each directed
sensor to detect an illuminated object present within a detection zone having
an angular
dimension of 0.196 degrees within the detection plane.
While providing some image information with respect to the location of a
projectile in space, the full location of an object, much less its trajectory,
cannot be
defined through use of a single linear array of directed pixel sensors. This
invention
addresses a method by which multiple linear arrays having directed pixel
sensors may be
utilized to obtain more information about the location of an object, and
according to
variants, defining both its location in space and its trajectory.
The invention in its general form will first be described, and then its
implementation in terms of specific embodiments will be detailed with
reference to the
2
CA 02444464 2003-10-15
drawings following hereafter. These embodiments are intended to demonstrate
the
principle of the invention, and the manner of its implementation. The
invention in its
broadest and more specific forms will then be further described, and defined,
in each of
the individual claims which conclude this Specification.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
According to one feature of the invention two linear detection arrays having a
plurality of directed pixel sensors are positioned to provide overlapping
fields of view in,
or substantially within, a common, shared planar field of view. Upon the
emission of
illumination from a source, reflected signals from an object present within
the common
field of view will be simultaneously detected by those pixel sensors whose
individual
fields of view are aligned with the object at the time of its illumination. By
triangulation,
the position of the object within the planar field of view can then be
calculated. Knowing
the baseline between the two detection arrays, and the angular orientation in
space of the
common field of view, the precise position in space of the illuminated object
at its time
of illumination can be calculated.
The respective fields of view of the two linear detection arrays need not be
precisely co-planar. If such fields of view axe sufficiently proximate to each
other an
object of finite length may simultaneously be detected in both fields.
Furthermore, taking
the hypothetical case of an infinitely small object, the consecutive detection
of the object
by the first and second
arrays over a very short interval can be taken, as an approximation, as being
simultaneous. In either case, by treating the respective fields of view as if
they were
coplanar, the location of the object in space can be approximated.
By employing a pair of sets of two linear detection arrays, each providing
respective common fields of view, an accurate measurement of the velocity and
the
direction of a projectile can be made. The recorded time between the
successive
3
CA 02444464 2003-10-15
intersections with the respective common fields of view allows the
projectile's trajectory
to be established between the two sighting points. When the threat penetrates
the first
planar field of view of the first pair of position sensors, a first set of x-
coordinate a, and
y-coordinate h is calculated. The same sequence of events is repeated when the
projectile
enters the second planar field of view and a second set of coordinates is
calculated. The
intended point of impact and the projectile's velocity can then be determined
from the
two sets of coordinates combined with the time delay between sightings. In
other words,
the projectile's collision trajectory can be extrapolated from the trajectory
portion
established between the two sighting points. As well, the timing of the
arrival of the
projectile at an interception point can be established. This enables the
timely launching
of an intercepting, counter-measure munition.
While the invention has been described in an active armour application, it can
be
usefully employed wherever there is a need to determine the location of an
object, and as
described, both its location in space and its trajectory.
The foregoing summarizes the principal features of the invention and some of
its
optional aspects. The invention may be further understood by the description
of the
preferred embodiments, in conjunction with the drawings, which now follow.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Figures 1 and 2 are graphs of D a~ and ~ h variations as functions of j3 and
y, i.e.
a, and h respectively.
Figure 2-1 depicts the operating principle for defending the top of a tank
turret
based on the sensor system of the invention.
Figure 2-2 depicts the top of a tank turret carrying four sensor pods and
shaped
charge arrays.
4
CA 02444464 2003-10-15
Figure 2-3 shows the system of the invention protecting the two sides and
front of
an armoured personnel carrier (APC) against over side attacks.
Figures 2-4 A, B and C depict the operational sequence that protects the APC
of
Figure 2-3.
Figure 2-5 depicts the common, shared planar field of view of two position
sensing arrays.
Figure 2-6 shows the geometry that allows an illuminated obj ect within to be
located by a set of polar coordinates overlaid on the shared planar field of
view.
Figure 2-9 depicts a dimensioned version of Figures 2-1 and 2-4 A, B and C.
Figure 2-12 depicts the vulnerability zone of a Carl Gustav round, shown as
14.6
cm.
Figure 2-13 depicts a protected zone on one side of the vehicle for the top of
a
tank turret by means of two sensor pods.
Figure 3-1 is a functional block diagram of the system ofthe invention applied
to
an active armour defense.
Figure 4-1 shows active armour based on an electromagnetic plate launcher.
Figure 4-2 A and B depict front and side views of the common, shared planar
field of view of two position sensing arrays projecting from the side of a
tank.
Figure 4-3 is a side view depicting the system of the invention defending the
front
end of an Ml 13 armoured personnel carrier (APC).
5
CA 02444464 2003-10-15
Figure 4-4 is a front view depicting the system of the invention defending the
both sides of an M113 armoured personnel carrier.
Figure 4-S is a front view depicting the system of the invention defending the
both sides and the top of an M 113 armoured personnel carrier.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
An active armour system includes a sensor suite connected to an electronic
signal
processor (ESP), an electronic safe arm-and-fire (ESAF) system, and defensive
ammunition. The operational characteristics of these subsystems are
interdependent and
are functions of the threat velocity, as well as the reaction times of the
ESAF and the
defense ammunition.
The projectile detection system of the invention benefits from an anticipatory
warning of an approaching projectile received from a distance detector means,
such as
radar or an infrared -IR- detection system. This may be provided by a ranging
IR
detector that is sensitive to the temperature of the attacking missiles, i.e.
it operates
between 8 ~,m and 12 Vim. Such infrared sensors define a primary defense zone,
responding to the heat radiated by a missile as it flies toward the host
vehicle by
switching-on the illuminators of the invention and initiate the position
sensors to
accurately locate the incoming projectile. Suitable illuminators include GaAs
diode lasers
or a Xenon flash tube with the diameter of the projection optics being on the
order of 8
mm.
As soon as the IR detector detects a potential threat, it may optionally
switch-on a
radar transceiver as well as the illuminators and the position sensors in
order to initiate an
identification sequence. This operational sequence ensures the stealth
characteristic of the
vehicle: the passive IR sensor operates continually while the active and
therefore
detectable radar transceiver is only switched on for a few milliseconds. If
the roles of the
radar and the IR sensor were interchanged, the former would define the primary
defense
6
CA 02444464 2003-10-15
zone, while the latter would define the secondary defense zone. Consequently,
the
vehicle would cease to be stealthy. However, since the range of a 10 GHz radar
transceiver can be only a few meters, the stealth characteristics are not
severely
compromised over typical tactical engagement distances. Assuming that the
radar
detection range is 5 m, the time between the "Arm" and "Fire" events could be
14
milliseconds, which relaxes the design constraints of the unit. Furthermore,
radar may be
requires as the primary defense zone when the threat is a high speed kinetic
energy -KE-
round.
In the case of KE rounds, the function of radar is to detect and identify the
threat
preferably at a distance of P 00 m, or Less preferably at a distance of 50 m.
The larger the
stand-off distance, the longer the time interval between the "Arm" event and
the "Fire"
event, and the easier it is to design a reliable system. However, this
desirable feature for
defensive purposes weakens the stealth characteristics of the host vehicle
If these distance position sensors detect a rapidly moving object - which
meets a
set of amplitude and time duration acceptance criteria - within their faelds
of view, then
the Electronic Signal Processor (ESP) which is connected to receive signals
from the
sensing arrays of the invention, awaits the arrival of the projectile at the
close-in sensing
zones of the detection system of the invention. The ESP then determines by
triangulation
the successive positions of the object with respect to the defensive arrays,
calculates a
projected trajectory and selecting one or more defensive countermeasures with
the
highest kill probability for activation.
Doppler radar may be switched to confirm that the cross section and approach
speed are that of a missile before the selected defensive munition cluster is
armed and
then detonated. Such defensive munitions may be in the form of jets formed by
miniature
shaped charges with a jet velocity of up to 7000 m/s that perforate the
missile and
explode its warhead. Or they may be in the form of hardened plates that are
protected
into the path of the incoming threat, kinetically disrupting its trajectory.
Figure 2-13 depicts a protected zone on one side of the vehicle for the top of
a
tank turret by means of two sensor pods and shaped charge arrays. In this case
each pod
7
CA 02444464 2003-10-15
contains two assemblies, each assembly including one IR sensor, one position
sensor
array and one illuminator. ~ptionally, for redundancy each assembly may also
include
an IR sensor. A typical IR sensor can have a field of view of 90° x
1.4° with an objective
lens having a diameter of about 25 mm. The arrays of each assembly are
oriented to
define two, distinct array fields of view. In this configuration the system
protects the
turret roof - the most vulnerable part of a tank - against over flying top
attack from
threats such as the Bofors BILL or the TC~W 2B. These anti-tank missiles are
designed to
fly over the turret and fire a shaped charge or EFP through the roof. The
sides of the
turret are assumed to be protected by armour and reactive armour.
The system of the invention can also protect the two sides, the front and the
top
against over flying top attacks of an armoured personnel carrier (APC), as
shown in
Figure 2-3. The operational sequence that protects an APC is summarized in
Figures 2-4
A, B and C.
The position of the threat with respect to the defensive array on. one side of
the
vehicle is determined by four optronic sensors located two to each assembly.
Each
sensor is preferably a silicon photodiode linear array operating in the
visible and near IR
spectrum, i.e. 0.4 ~m to 1.1 p,m. These sensors are switched-on and
synchronized at the
scan rate of the illuminators sensor, i.e. approximately 10-100 kHz. The
position sensors
therefore rely on light contrast to detect a missile against a background.
The illuminator ensures sufficient light contrast not only at night but also
against
a day light background. This means that a missile can be detected if the
position sensors
face the ground or against the sky, though not necessarily with the sun as
background.
Sun blindness may be reduced by placing a band-pass filter whose center
wavelength is
905 nm, in front of the linear array of silicon photodiodes. This wavelength
corresponds
to the 905 nm radiation from a CraAs laser diode used as an illuminator.
8
CA 02444464 2003-10-15
The individual "pixel" position sensors can have a field of view of about
90° x
0.2°. Available position censoring arrays suitable for this application
have the following
characteristics:
Lens characteristics
f/1.8
Focal length : 3.8 mm
Diameter of Objective
Lens . 6.8 mm
Detector , linear photodiode array
Number of diodes (pixels):: 512
Width of linear array , 0.013 mm
Diode pitch ; 0.013 mm
Length of array : 6.656 mrn
Each sensor array has a fan-shaped field of view whose angular dimensions are
90° by 0.196°, consisting of 512 detection zones. Each detection
zone has angular
dimensions of 0.196° x 0.196°. The detection zones of one each
of the two sensors of
each assembly are aligned to intersect substantially within a common, shared
planar field
of view. An illumination source is provided, typically in the form of GaAs
laser emitting
diodes positioned and directed to provide virtually instant illumination
within the
common, shared planar field of view. This allows an illuminated object within
the
common, shared planar field of view to be located by a set of polar
coordinates overlaid
on the shared planar field of view (see Figure 2-5).
The electronic signal processor (ESP), scanning both photodiode detectors in
each
respective assembly at a possible rate of 2.44 kHz, measures angles (3 and y
and
calculates the x-coordinate al, of the missile (see Figure 2-6). The y-
coordinate h can also
be calculated.
9
CA 02444464 2003-10-15
The missile coordinates are defined by the following equations:
ta~ ~
ai = a
tan J.3 + tan y
h - a tan ~3 tan y
tan ~3 + tan y
When an attacking missile is within the field of view of a sensor its image
covers
a certain number of pixels on the detector array; angles (3 and y are measured
from the
center of this image. As an example, an 84-mm wide Carl Gustav round at 2 m
subtends
an angle of 2.4I ° and its image on the detector array would cover 13
to 14 pixels. It will
be assumed that angles (3 and y can be measured with an r.m.s. error of two
pixels; i.e.
close to ~ 0.4° = 0.00698 rad.
Ba, _ ~ ~~ dlj ' + ( ~Y ~y~
lz z ~4)
4h = ~~ ~ j3 + ~~ 4 y
Where
_8a1 - tan y
_a
8~3 cosz ~3 (tan ~3 + tan y~2
_aal _ _a tan ~i
cry cos2 y (tan /3 + tan y~2
_7h tan 2 y
=a
ap cosz ~3 (tan,Q + tan y~2
_ah _ a tanz /3 ~8)
8y cost y (tan /3 + tan y~
For j3 = 16.0°, y = 63.4° and a = 4.0 m the following r.m.s.
errors were
calculated:
CA 02444464 2003-10-15
Da,=l.4 Cm
D a, = 2.3 cmGraphs of D a, and 8 h variations as functions of (3 and y, i.e.
a~ and
h respectively, are shown in Figures 1 and 2.
'The position sensor plays a critical role in locating the attacking missile
with
respect to the defensive array. For this reason its functional performance
requirements
will be examined in detail, bearing in mind that this device will be required
to predict the
impact of a KE round on an target, as part of the sensor suite in an active
armour system.
Operational Performance Igequirements for the Position Sensor
To defend the side of an MI13 armoured personnel carrier the system a shaped
charge counter-measure will be analyzed.
It will be assumed that the threat is approaching at the top level, i.e. 1.1 m
vertical
distance above the defensive array. A 6 cm distance exists between the last
detection
zone and the interception distance between the trigger zone and the target
zone takes into
account the time delays listed in Table 2-1 as well as the velocity of the
attacking missile,
in this case equal to 270 m/s.
TABLE 2-1
Time delays associated with the interception of the threat
Event Time duration
Generate fire command < 1 ps
Discharge capacitor, initiate/propagate 1 ~s
HNS
Initiation and propagation of precision ~ 25 ps
booster
11
CA 02444464 2003-10-15
Formation of warhead j ets ~ 20 ~,s
Time for the j ets to travel 1.5 m at a 210 pas
velocity of 7000 m/s
Total ~ 257 ~.s
In approximately 257 p.s the missile covers about 7 cm. It is therefore in
the target zone where it is intercepted by the jets.
The defensive clusters which may be used may each contain three shaped
charges, spaced 10.8 cm apart, in an equilateral triangle configuration. A
preferred 7.5 cm distance between shaped charges may be enlargened to a 10.8-
cm distance to provide protection against cross-detonation.
Let us now determine the distance between the trigger zone and the target
zone if we wanted to maximize the probability of interception, when the
missile
travels at the lower level. In this case, the time delay is equal to the sum
of the
first four parameters in Table 2-1, i.e. approximately 47 ps. A missile
traveling at
270 m/s covers approximately 1.3 cm during this time period. This means that
for
optimum effectiveness against an attack at the lower level, the target zone
should
be placed in the immediate vicinity of the trigger zone.
We shall now examine whether or not under those conditions the system
would still be effective in case of an attack at the upper level. According to
Table
2-1, it takes 210 ~s for the jets to cover 1.5 m. During this time the missile
traveling at 270 m/s would penetrate approximately 6 cm into the target zone.
However, 100% hit probability still applies, since the length of the
vulnerability
zone of a Carl Gustav round is 14.6 cm, as shown in Figure 2-12. We can
therefore conclude that the attacking missile can be intercepted at any height
between the top level and the bottom level.
12
CA 02444464 2003-10-15
The minimum time delay between automatic "Arm" and "Fire," the key
design parameter of the electronic safe arm-and-fire (ESAF) unit can also be
deduced from Figure 2-9. It corresponds to the time it takes for the missile
to
cover 0.48 m, i.e. the minimum distance between the defensive zone and the
trigger zone at the lower level. Assuming that the attacking missile flies at
350
m/s, the time to cover this distance is 1.37 milliseconds. A desirable design
figure
for the reaction time of the electronic safe arm-and-fire system would be in
the
range of 0.75 milliseconds to 1 milliseconds.
The sensor suite of the invention should be able to detect and identify
Kinetic
Energy - KE - rounds traveling at 1400 m/s, allowing that an increased the
scan rate is
required from 2.44 kHz to 9.77 kHz. First, it is preferable that the KE round
is detected
by radar within an outer defensive zone at an approximate distance of 100 m.
At this
stage, its position in space is known as a set of cylindrical coordinates,
i.e. range, bearing
and altitude. After the next radar measurement the threat's direction is
determined.
When the KE round penetrates the two close-range detection zones provided by
the invention, its a, and h coordinates (see Figure 2-6) with respect to the
two-
dimensional defensive array of launchable plates are calculated and its
direction is
known. Consequently, its trajectory as it approaches the vehicle is known so
that the
plates) with the highest hit probability can be selected and activated.
Although the r.m.s.
errors in the measurement of a2 and h have been calculated to be 1.4 cm and
2.9 cm
respectively, the error associated with the determination of the intended
impact point
cannot be evaluated by radar alone because the accuracy of the threat
direction measured
by radar is not known. However, an indication of this accuracy is provided by
estimating
the dimensions of the plate launched against the threat. Resort may be made to
a 10 kg
plate as well as a 20 kg plate, and a thickness equal to the diameter of the
KE round, i.e.
25 mm. Based on these data and assuming that the plates are square gives two
results:
32.0 cm x 32.0 cm and 22.6 cm x 22.6 cm.
I3
CA 02444464 2003-10-15
It is likely that the angular error in the direction measurement of the threat
made by radar is compensated by the close proximity of the position sensor
field
of view to the vehicle, as mentioned above.
The proposed configuration of the system defending the front end of an M113
armoured personnel carrier (APC) is illustrated in Figure 4-3. The front of
the vehicle is
defended by four detection zones, two directed downward (C and D) generated by
E-O
pods 1 and 2 (in this view E-O pod 2 is behind E-O pod 1) and two directed
upward (B
and A) generated by E-O pods 3 and 4 (in this view E-O pod 3 is behind E-O pod
4).
Each detection zone consists of three parallel fields of view defined by an IR
sensor,
illuminator and a position sensor. For the sake of clarity each detection zone
is
represented by a single line. The range of the position sensor is typically
from a
minimum of 0.81 m to a maximum of about 3 m. It is apparent from the geometry
of the
detection zones that a KE round is detected by either pair of detection zones,
or by both
in the region where they intersect.
A pair of detection zones allows the accurate measurement of the velocity and
the
direction of the projectile. Assuming that it moves along the path shown in
Figure 4-3, its
intersection with detection zone B yields one set of coordinates a~ and h
(defined in
Figure 2-6), while its intersection with detection zone A yields another set
of coordinates.
These data and the time between the successive intersections allow the
determination of
the projectile velocity and the intended impact point on the vehicle. As soon
as the KE
round enters the field of view of the distance IR sensor, (not shown), the
latter switches
on the illuminator. When the threat penetrates the first planar field of view
of the first
pair of position sensors, the first set of x-coordinate a, and y-coordinate h
is calculated.
The same sequence of events is repeated when the KE round enters the second
planar
field of view and a second set of coordinates is calculated. The intended
point of impact
and the KE round's velocity can then be determined from the two sets of
coordinates
combined with the time delay between sightings by projecting the collision
trajectory
from the trajectory portion established between the two sighting points. At
this point the
appropriate response munition is selected by the electronic signal processor
(ESP).
14
CA 02444464 2003-10-15
For example, assuming that the threat's trajectory is horizontal, the error in
the
determination of the intended impact point is a function of two consecutive
errors in the
measurement of al and the distance to the vehicle. The worst case occurs at a
distance of
0.81 m, i.e. closest to the vehicle. According to calculations above, the
r.m.s. error in the
measurement of al is dal = 1.4 cm. Hence the cumulative error is 2.8 cm. Since
the
distance between the protectgon zones at this level is 0.77 m, the
corresponding angular
error is tari ' 2.8/77 = 2.1 ° and the lateral error on the vehicle is
3.0 cm.
The accurate determination of the intended impact point on the vehicle
using two consecutive detection planes means that the search/traclcing radar
can
be a low-cost intrusion radar that can be installed in hardened, low-
silhouette pods
on top of the vehicle. It is estimated that four radar transceivers will be
required to
defend each side of the vehicle, and three to prated the front. They can be
arranged in such a way that their radiation patterns overlap, so that the
primary
defense zone is not breached if one of them is damaged.
The main function of the Doppler radar transceivers is to wam at a range
of 50 m to 100 m of the approaching threat, to measure the velocity and
approximate cross-section of the latter and to initiate the arming sequence.
If a
threat crosses a pair of close-in protection zones provided by the invention,
the
ESP sends a command to the ESAF unit and the munition with the maximum hit
probability is projected against the KE round. However, if the initial radar
detection is not confirmed by a crossing of the protection zones, the system
can be
stood-down.
Each close-in protection zone is defined by the fields of view of the
position sensors as well as the radiation patterns of the illuminators. If the
field of
view of the position sensors were 90° , as shown in Figure 2-5, a
threat
approaching the vehicle at an oblique angle through the vulnerable zone
(behind
the protection zones in Figure 4-3) would go undetected. This can be prevented
by
increasing the field of view of the pods to 180°.
CA 02444464 2003-10-15
A similar configuration can protect the sides of the vehicle as shown in
Figure 4-4. Vulnerable zones are protected by increasing the sensor fields of
view
on the right and left vehicle sides from 90° to 180°. All upward
pointing
protection zones defend the sides of the vehicle against overflying top
attacks.
Figure 4-5 is the same as Figure 4-4 except additional protection zones have
been
added to protect the top of the vehicle against dive attacks.
CONCLUSION
The foregoing has constituted a description of specific embodiments
showing how the invention may be applied and put into use. These embodiments
are only exemplary. The invention in its broadest, and more specific aspects
is
further described and defined in the claims which now follow.
These claims, and the language used therein, are to be
understood in terms of the variants of the invention which have been
described.
They are not to be restricted to such variants, but are to be read as covering
the
full scope of the invention as is implicit within the invention and the
disclosure
that has been provided herein.
16
