Language selection

Search

Patent 2447498 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2447498
(54) English Title: ANTI-FALL OFF SYSTEM AND METHOD
(54) French Title: METHODE ET SYSTEME ANTI-CHUTE (MATERIAU SUR BOBINE)
Status: Expired
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • B65H 23/032 (2006.01)
  • B65H 16/00 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • ROBITAILLE, MARTIN (Canada)
  • GAGNON, STEVE (Canada)
  • CARBONNEAU, ALAIN (Canada)
(73) Owners :
  • ROBITAILLE, MARTIN (Canada)
(71) Applicants :
  • ROBITAILLE, MARTIN (Canada)
(74) Agent: BROUILLETTE LEGAL INC.
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2006-01-03
(22) Filed Date: 2003-11-05
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 2005-05-05
Examination requested: 2003-11-05
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data: None

Abstracts

English Abstract

The invention relates to an improvement in a system and method for dispensing a strip like material (tape, ribbon, web or string) wound on a roll, drum or reel when the strip material is unwound at a laminating machine such as a corrugating machine or press. An idler roller is positioned in parallel near the roll of strip material. The strip material is lead around the idler roller, back around the roll, drum or reel and again around the idler roller before entering the machine.


French Abstract

L'invention concerne une amélioration dans un système et un procédé de distribution d'un matériau de type bande (adhésif, ruban, bande ou fil) enroulé sur un rouleau, un tambour ou une bobine lorsque le matériau en bande est déroulé dans une machine de stratification comme une onduleuse ou une presse. Un rouleau-guide est positionné en parallèle à proximité du rouleau de matériau en bande. Le matériau en bande est guidé autour du rouleau-guide, de nouveau autour du rouleau, du tambour ou de la bobine et de nouveau autour du rouleau-guide avant d'entrer dans la machine.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.



What is claimed is:

1. A system for dispensing strip material wound transversely on a roll, drum
or reel and
mounted for rotation about an axis wherein the strip is lead around an idler
roller, around
said roll, drum or reel and again around the idler roller and then fed to
other parts of the
dispensing system, whereby fall off of the strip material from said roll, drum
or reel is
avoided.
2. A system as claimed in claim 1 wherein the said axis is horizontal.
3. A system as claimed in claim 2 wherein strip material is a reinforcing or
tear tape.
4. A method of dispensing a strip material wound transversely on a roll, drum
or reel and
mounted for rotation about a first axis comprising the following steps:
a) placing an idler roller along a second axis parallel to said first axis;
b) leading said strip material around said idler roller;
c) leading said strip material around said roll, drum or reel;
d) leading said material again around the said idler roller.
5. A method as claimed in claim 4 wherein the said axes are horizontal.
6. A method as claimed in claim 5 wherein strip material is a reinforcing or
tear tape.




Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.



CA 02447498 2004-11-19
ANTI-FALL OFF SYSTEM AND METHOD
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to an improvement in a system and method for dispensing
a tape, i.e.,
ribbon, web or string, generally referred to herein as "tape", when the tape
is being unwound at a
laminating machine such as a corrugating machine or press. One aspect of the
present invention
is to prevent the tape from falling off the edge of the tape package when
unwinding. Another
aspect is to prevent the tape from twisting in the dispensing equipment.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PRIOR ART
Reinforcing or Tear tapes have been used for many years in modern packaging as
an aid to
maintain structural integrity or as an easy open feature in boxes, packages
and/or containers.
One limitation of the dispensing equipment used at the laminating machine is
the difficulty to
prevent the tape from falling off the edge of the tape package. To be able to
put a reasonable
amount of linear footage on a tape package, the use of a cross winding
principle is mandatory, so
for a tape with a width of '/2 inch wide, the tape package can be 13 to 18
inch wide, with a
diameter up to 18 inches. As a result, the tape is wound on the package with a
traverse pattern
so that when the tape is wound around a spindle, at the same time the tape is
moved in a back
and forth movement along the length of the spindle. The ratio between the
numbers of
revolutions of the spindle over the stroke of the tape along the length of the
spindle is known as
the winding ratio. Since the tape can be slippery at room temperature there is
a danger that,
when the tape gets at the edge of the tape package and it stays there until it
changes direction to
go back toward the middle of the package, it can come off the edge of the tape
package and fall
off down to the spindle of the tape package. When that happens, the tape
cannot go back to the
delivering surface of the tape package and the package stops delivering tape
with the result that
the tape breaks.
1


CA 02447498 2004-11-19
To prevent the tape from coming off the edge of the tape package, the tape
industry has used
different techniques such as: adhesive formulation providing added tack
between the layers of
the tape package, fast winding ratios to try to limit the amount of time when
the tape is
positioned near the edge of the tape package, roll flanges made of hard
materials or paper coated
with pressure sensitive adhesives placed on the edges of the tape package to
create a physical
barrier to prevent the tape from falling off the edge of the tape package, and
so on. Each of these
techniques have their drawbacks which can reduce tape performance at the
laminating machine.
For example, increasing the tack of the adhesive formulation of the tape can
diminish the
performance of the tape in the laminating process or can cause other tape
dispensing problems
such as pulleys becoming gummed with adhesive deposits coming from the
adhesive of the tape.
Another example is the tape that can be damaged by the physical barrier on the
edge of the tape
package, when the physical barrier rubs on the sides of the tape package
during shipment.
The literature is abundant with tape dispenser systems and tape splicing
systems for unwinding
tape packages at laminating machines or presses. Often the literature is
describing splicing
system, as all tape must be feed to continuously running processes and since
all tape packages
contain a very limited amount of linear footage, the splicing feature becomes
a critical element.
We can see this in the following patents (or application): US 4,917,327; US
5,029,768; US
2002/0059982; US 6,325,324; US 5,775,629 and US 6,622,959. It would be evident
to someone
outside this industry that the simplest way to diminish the criticality of the
splicing system
would be to increase the amount of linear footage on a tape package. But as
the industry is well
aware, one of the main reason why tape packages are not made larger is that as
the diameter of
the tape package increases, the amount of time that the tape stays at the edge
of the package
increases, thus increasing the dangers of having tape fall offs to a point
where it becomes a
major problem. This invention solves this problem, as any increases in the
tape package
diameter does not increase the occurrence of fall offs.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is directed to a system and method using means to
prevent strip material
2


CA 02447498 2004-11-19
such as a tape from falling off the edges of the tape package. An idler roller
is used and
positioned near the unwinding tape package, where the tape, coming off the
tape package when
unwinding, will go around the idler roller and back around the tape package at
least once and
from there to the system dispensing the tape to the laminating machine. In
this manner when the
tape is coming off the tape package, it goes around the idler roller and tape
package combination
at least once before going through the rest of the dispensing system, in
effect creating at least
one loop of tape going around the idler roller tape package combination. This
apparatus and
method prevents the tape from falling off the tape package because the tape
leaving the package
at the nip point of the tape and tape package when unwinding is being pulled
towards the centre
of the tape package by the preceding loop of tape going around the idler
roller tape package
combination. Without that innovation, when the tape leaves the tape package at
the moment the
tape is at it's edge, the tape actually tries to find the shortest route,
which is going off the side of
the tape package; a defect called a fall-off.
With this innovation, we use the fact that the tape is always somewhat
slippery between each of
it's layers on the tape package, so that when the tape first leaves the tape
package during
unwinding, it is pulled away from the edge of the tape package and towards the
centre of the tape
package by the preceding loop of tape around the idler roller tape package
combination, as the
loop of tape around the idler roller tape package combination is ahead in the
winding pattern of
the tape package. Alternatively, when the tape leaves the idler roller tape
package combination
for the last time before going to the rest of the dispensing system towards
the laminating
machine, this tape has already been pulled off the tape package at least once,
thus is loose on the
idler roller tape package combination and is then being pulled towards the
center, away from the
tape package edges by the geometry of the tape dispenser. As a result, the
tape is always pulled
towards the center (length) of the tape package either by the preceding loop
around the idler
roller tape package combination, or by the geometry of the dispenser when the
tape finally
leaves the idler roller tape package combination.
Another improvement resulting of the use of the loop of tape around the idler
roller tape package
combination, is the fact that the tape stays flat at all time during
unwinding, even if the tape is
being pulled to the center of the tape package by the geometry of the tape
dispenser and the
3


CA 02447498 2004-11-19
traverse winding of the tape package, which helps prevent the tape from
twisting further along
the tape dispensing equipment.
These and other novel features of the invention will be more fully described
herein below.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The present invention will be described with reference to the accompanying
drawing wherein:
FIG. I is a view of the tape package, idler roller and first pulley of tape
dispenser system.
FIG. 2 is a top view of the tape package, idler roller and first pulley of
tape dispenser system.
FIG. 3 is a side view of the tape package, idler roller and first pulley of
tape dispenser system.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
The present invention provides an improved system and method for the
dispensing of a strip
material such as a tape at the corrugating machine or press. A tape package 13
is unwound,
where the tape is wound with a traverse wind ratio as can be seen by the tape
paths 14, 15 and 16
around the tape package 13. The tape 10 first leaves the nip point 17 and
before going to the
pulley 11 of the tape dispensing system, it goes around idler roller 12 and
back around the tape
package 13 idler roller 12 combination at least once, before going to the
pulley 11.
4

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date 2006-01-03
(22) Filed 2003-11-05
Examination Requested 2003-11-05
(41) Open to Public Inspection 2005-05-05
(45) Issued 2006-01-03
Expired 2023-11-06

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Request for Examination $200.00 2003-11-05
Application Fee $150.00 2003-11-05
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 2005-09-13
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 2005-09-13
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 2 2005-11-07 $50.00 2005-10-17
Final Fee $150.00 2005-10-27
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 3 2006-11-06 $50.00 2006-09-13
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 4 2007-11-05 $50.00 2007-11-01
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 5 2008-11-05 $100.00 2008-10-15
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 6 2009-11-05 $100.00 2009-09-17
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 7 2010-11-05 $100.00 2010-10-05
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 8 2011-11-07 $100.00 2011-10-12
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 9 2012-11-05 $100.00 2012-10-04
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 10 2013-11-05 $125.00 2013-09-11
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 11 2014-11-05 $125.00 2014-09-11
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 12 2015-11-05 $125.00 2015-08-17
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 13 2016-11-07 $125.00 2016-11-01
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 14 2017-11-06 $125.00 2017-10-23
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 15 2018-11-05 $225.00 2018-10-10
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 16 2019-11-05 $225.00 2019-10-04
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 17 2020-11-05 $225.00 2020-10-14
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 18 2021-11-05 $229.50 2021-10-27
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 19 2022-11-07 $229.04 2022-10-20
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
ROBITAILLE, MARTIN
Past Owners on Record
CARBONNEAU, ALAIN
GAGNON, STEVE
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Abstract 2003-11-05 1 12
Description 2003-11-05 3 150
Claims 2003-11-05 1 10
Drawings 2003-11-05 2 25
Representative Drawing 2004-01-05 1 6
Maintenance Fee Payment 2020-10-14 1 33
Maintenance Fee Payment 2021-10-27 1 33
Maintenance Fee Payment 2022-10-20 1 33
Abstract 2004-11-19 1 11
Description 2004-11-19 4 175
Claims 2004-11-19 1 23
Cover Page 2005-04-18 1 30
Cover Page 2005-12-06 1 32
Correspondence 2003-12-05 1 13
Assignment 2003-11-05 2 69
Prosecution-Amendment 2004-05-19 2 64
Correspondence 2004-09-13 2 58
Fees 2005-10-17 1 34
Correspondence 2004-09-28 1 16
Correspondence 2004-09-28 1 18
Fees 2006-09-13 1 31
Prosecution-Amendment 2004-11-19 16 503
Correspondence 2004-12-09 4 98
Correspondence 2005-03-29 1 23
Correspondence 2005-04-22 2 63
Correspondence 2005-05-24 1 14
Correspondence 2005-05-24 1 17
Assignment 2005-09-13 5 203
Correspondence 2005-10-27 1 40
Maintenance Fee Payment 2017-10-23 1 33
Correspondence 2007-11-01 2 68
Fees 2007-11-01 1 38
Fees 2008-10-15 1 37
Fees 2009-09-17 1 201
Fees 2010-10-05 1 201
Maintenance Fee Payment 2018-10-10 1 33
Fees 2011-10-12 1 163
Fees 2012-10-04 1 163
Maintenance Fee Payment 2019-10-04 1 33
Fees 2013-09-11 1 33
Fees 2014-09-11 1 33
Fees 2016-11-01 1 33
Fees 2015-08-17 1 33