Language selection

Search

Patent 2448820 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2448820
(54) English Title: ABRASION RESISTANT, TROPICALISED POTASH FERTILISER GRANULATE, METHOD OF ITS PRODUCTION AND DEVICE FOR CARRYING OUT THE METHOD
(54) French Title: ENGRAIS POTASSIQUE GRANULE TROPICALISE, RESISTANT A L'ABRASION, METHODE DE PRODUCTION ET DISPOSITIF CONNEXES
Status: Deemed expired
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C05D 1/00 (2006.01)
  • C05G 3/20 (2020.01)
  • C05G 5/12 (2020.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • KRAUKE, WOLFGANG (Germany)
  • HEUCHEL, BARBARA (Germany)
  • LEIB, GERHARD (Germany)
  • GUENTER, HARALD (Germany)
  • MARX, HEINRICH (Germany)
(73) Owners :
  • K-UTEC AG SALT TECHNOLOGIES (Germany)
(71) Applicants :
  • KALI-UMWELTTECHNIK SONDERSHAUSEN GMBH (Germany)
(74) Agent: RICHES, MCKENZIE & HERBERT LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2009-07-28
(22) Filed Date: 2003-11-10
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 2004-05-13
Examination requested: 2003-11-10
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
102 52 848.9 Germany 2002-11-13

Abstracts

English Abstract

This invention relates to an improved potash fertiliser granulate with reduced moisture absorption capacity and increased strength (reduced susceptibility to abrasion). This product is free of oxidic additives and can be produced by a simple and economical method.


French Abstract

L'invention a trait à un engrais à la potasse en granulés amélioré, ayant une capacité d'absorption de l'humidité réduite et une puissance supérieure (diminution de la vulnérabilité à l'abrasion). Le produit est exempt d'additifs oxydiques, et il peut être fabriqué à l'aide d'une méthode simple et peu coûteuse.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.




16

Claims


1. A method for producing improved potash fertiliser granulates, comprising
the
treatment of a potash fertiliser raw granulate with a solution containing
silicate or
carbonate, followed by the application of kinetic energy in the form of
vibrations.

2. The method according to claim 1, whereby the solutions used contain
silicate or
carbonate materials in an amount of 5 to 25% weight.

3. The method according to claim 1 or 2, whereby the solutions are added in
dosages of 1 to 2.5% weight, referred to the total quantity of raw granulate
and
solution.

4. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 3, whereby the application
of
the kinetic energy occurs through a vibration treatment in the frequency range
from 15
to 70 Hz at an amplitude of 2 to 20 mm and a dwell period of 10 to 180 s.

5. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 4, whereby the solutions are

aqueous solutions and said silicate or carbonate are selected from sodium
metasilicate, potash, soda or silicate of sodium.

6. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 5, also including the
application of a coating with a water repellent substance.

7. The method according to claim 6, whereby the water repellent substance is
oil,
an amine, a wax or an oil/amine mixture, whereby an amount of water repellent
substance applied to the granulate is 1 to 3 kg/t of granulate.

8. A potash fertiliser granulate, obtained using the method as defined in any
one
of claims 1 to 7.

9. The potash fertiliser granulate according to claim 8 with a moisture
absorption of
less than 2%.



17

10. The potash fertiliser granulate according to any one of claims 8 to 9,
also
including a partial coating with a water repellent substance.

11. The potash fertiliser granulate according to any one of claims 8 to 10
with
an abrasion value of less than 4%.

12. The potash fertiliser granulate according to any one of claims 8 to 11,
whereby the potash fertiliser granulate is free of oxidic compounds of
magnesium
and/or calcium.

13. The potash fertiliser granulate according to any one of claims 8 to 12
with
a moisture absorption of less than 1%.

14. A device for producing an improved potash fertiliser granulate, including
an appliance for applying a solution to a raw granulate and an appliance for
transferring kinetic energy in the form of vibrations to the raw granulate
which has
been treated with the solution, wherein the solution comprises silicate or
carbonate.

15. The device according to claim 14, whereby the appliance for transferring
the kinetic energy in the form of vibrations is a vibrating conveyor.

16. The device according to any one of claims 14 to 15, whereby the
appliance for applying the solution is an intensifier-type of mixer with spray

nozzles.

17. The device according to any one of claims 14 to 16, also including a
drying unit.

18. The device according to at least one of claims 14 to 17, also including a
coating device for applying an organic water repellent substance.

19. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein said vibrations
are in a frequency range of from 10 to 70 Hz with an amplitude of 2 to 20 mm.



18

20. The device according to any one of claims 14 to 18, wherein said
vibrations are in a frequency range of from 10 to 70 Hz with an amplitude of 2
to
20 mm.

21. The method according to claim 7, wherein said oil/amine mixture has a
weight ratio of 1:1.

22. The method according to claim 6, wherein said water repellent substance
is palmitin.

23. The method according to claim 7, wherein said water repellent substance
is stearin wax.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.



CA 02448820 2003-11-10

1
Abrasion resistant, tropicalised potash fertiliser granulate, method of its
production and device for carrying out the method

Description
This invention relates to an abrasion resistant, tropicalised potash
fertiliser granulate, a
method of its production and a device for carrying out the method.

Brief description of the state of the art

Potash fertiliser granulates are used throughout the world and are valuable
substances
which are employed as nutrients in agriculture. Problems which occur again and
again
with this type of fertiliser granulate are on one hand the low mechanical
strength of the
granulates which leads to the unwanted formation of fine-grained dusts and the
low
resistance to moisture or the high moisture absorption of normal fertiliser
granulates,
which leads both to increases in weight and to impairment of the product
integrity, which
can cause problems particularly with the use of fertiliser granulates.

To overcome these problems, various methods are known in the state of the art.
Potash
fertiliser granulates are normally pressed by compacting fine-grained salts on
roller
presses to form so-called scabs with a thickness of about 5 to 12 mm. Then the
flat
scabs are further processed in a crushing and classifying process. The coarse-
grained
crushing product in the range of grain size from about 1 to 5 mm represents
the
required finished product (granulate) and the undersized particles are fed
back into the
granulating process (compaction followed by crushing) (Ulimanns Enzyklopadie
der
technischen Chemie (Ullmann's Encyclopaedia of technical chemistry), 4th
edition, Vol.
13, page 471).


CA 02448820 2003-11-10

2
This sort of granulate consists of edged to tapered grains with a surface
which is
comparatively rough due to the crushing process. With loading and unloading
and
transport stages it is inevitable with this type of granulate that there will
be abrasion due
to mechanical stressing, leading to the formation of unwanted undersized
particles (fine
dusts). On further processing or with the application of the granulates, these
materials
lead to the release of dust, which is undesirable with regard to industrial
safety and
product efficiency.

Furthermore, potash fertilisers can be basically classified as hygroscopic.
They absorb
moisture from the air, which however at temperate latitudes, affects the
strength and
storage capabilities of the granulates in manageable orders of magnitude. But
in zones
with tropical climates with relatively high air humidity, a significantly
higher water
absorption of the granulates occurs, leading to lowering of the grain
strength, increase
of the fine-grained proportion and to hardening of the product during storage.

With regard to the problems described above, there are rework methods for
potash
fertiliser granulates. For example, for the reduction of the formation of fine
grains due to
mechanical abrasion and the breakdown and hardening of the granules due to
moisture
absorption, there is the suggestion in DE-OS-1 36 956 for minimising the
abrasion
involving a combined application of the process steps of dust extraction in a
fluidised
bed and wetting the granulate surface with water. With this combination of
process
steps the objective is an improvement in the abrasion properties of the
granulates and
to facilitate the production of non-dusty potash fertilisers. The quoted dust
extraction in
the fluidised bed occurs at air speeds of 1 to 4 m/s. The water added to the
granulate
heated to 400 to 80 C amounts to 0.5 to 2% weight referred to the total mass,
preferably
1% weight. Drying of the granulate then takes place with a residual moisture
content of
0.1 to 0.2% weight by exploiting the thermal content of the granulate or by
introducing
preheated air currents. The granulates with this residual moisture content are
cooled to
room temperature and then processed further, for example, packaged. Also,
addition of


CA 02448820 2003-11-10

3
organic substances after cooling is possible, preferably mineral oil in
amounts of 0.2 to
1 g/kg of granulate, whereby evaporation of the residual water is delayed and
additional
binding of dust is ensured during application later.

DE-OS-210 650 explains as a supplement to the above quoted German disclosure
document that to achieve an optimum gain in strength, the potash fertiliser
granulates
are brought to a temperature of preferably 800 to 100 C in a mixer before
being wetted
with water. Furthermore, a minimum dwell period of 10 s in an atmosphere of
high
moisture content should be maintained.

Although the methods outlined above are, where applicable, able to rectify
strength
problems of the potash fertiliser granulates, the problem of moisture
absorption during
transport or loading and unloading processes and during periods of storage is
not
solved by such methods.

The problem of the absorption of moisture is however addressed in EP-A-
1048634.
Here it is disclosed that an increase in the strength of the granulate and a
reduction in
the moisture absorption of the granulate can be achieved if 0.1 to 2% weight
of an
additive is added to the fine salt of potash fertiliser used for granulation
before the
compacting process. This additive, which is preferably added in a quantity of
1 to 1.5%
weight, is preferably dry magnesium oxide or dry calcium oxide. Alternatively,
burnt
chalk and bumt dolomite is mentioned in the above quoted European application.

The addition of these additives, which is also described in the corresponding
American
application, US-A-6,379,414, results in granulates which exhibit a moisture
absorption
of 1.3 to 1.5% weight during storage at 20 C in 70% relative humidity after
eight days. A
disadvantage to this approach however is that the added additive is also
sensitive to
moisture. It is therefore to be expected that with high relative moisture
contents, as with
the above described test conditions, hydration of the additive will occur,
which is


CA 02448820 2006-09-07

4
associated with swelling. This sort of swelling of the granulates would
however severely
damage the grain structure of the granulates or lead to the breakdown of the
granulates
containing the additive. This sort of swelling effect is, for example,
described in
"Feuerfestkunde" (Refractory theory) (Harder und Kienow), Springer-Verlag
1960, and
can amount up to 53% by volume. It is therefore thoroughly conceivable that
the
addition of the additives in fact causes precisely an opposite effect, in
particular with
very high relative humidity, as in tropical zones.

It is therefore the object of this invention to provide an improved potash
fertiliser
granulate which with high relative humidity remains capable of storage without
the
above quoted problems occurring. Furthermore, the improved potash fertiliser
granulate
should exhibit an adequate strength, so that the formation of undersized
grains is
largely prevented. In addition, this invention assumes the task of providing a
method
for the production of this sort of potash fertiliser granulate and of
providing a device for
carrying out the method.

Brief description of the invention

In another aspect, the present invention provides a method for producing
improved
potash fertiliser granulates, comprising the treatment of a potash fertiliser
raw
granulate with a solution containing silicate or carbonate, followed by the
application of
kinetic energy in the form of vibrations.

In another aspect, the present invention provides a potash fertilizer
granulate obtained
using the method of the present invention.

In another aspect, the present invention provides a device for producing an
improved
potash fertiliser granulate, including an appliance for applying a solution to
a raw
granulate and an appliance for transferring kinetic energy in the form of
vibrations to
the raw granulate which has been treated with the solution.

The term potash fertiliser as used in this application includes the usual
known fertilisers
containing potassium, such as for example potassium nitrate, potassium
chloride,
potassium sulphate, potassium carbonate and the mixed salts derived from
potassium,
such as potassium magnesium chloride, potassium magnesium chloride sulphate,
potassium magnesium sulphate, etc. Those potash fertilisers are particularly
preferred


CA 02448820 2003-11-10

which preferably contain potassium chloride or potassium sulphate and mixtures
of
these components as the principal constituents.

Brief description of the figures

Figure 1 shows a flow chart of a normal method for producing potash fertiliser
granulate.
Figure 2 shows a flow chart of a method according to the invention for the
production of
a potash fertiliser granulate.

Figure 3 shows preferred devices for coating the granulates. Figure 3a shows a
schematic view of a vibrating fluidised bed dryer/cooler and Figure 3b shows a
schematic side view of a weir, adjustable in height with removable operating
appliance.
Figure 4 shows a further flow chart of a method corresponding to this
invention.

Detailed description of the invention

Starting from the known moisture sensitivity of potash fertiliser granulates,
examinations
were carried out to establish the reason for the moisture absorption of the
potash
fertiliser granulates. Here, it was found that the alkaline earth chlorides
present in
potash fertiliser granulates, which are the usual components accompanying the
natural
salts, influence very significantly the moisture absorption of the potash
fertiliser
granulates even in slight amounts. Magnesium chloride and calcium chloride
have a
very strong influence on the moisture absorption capacity of potash fertiliser
granulates.
This influence is shown in the following table.


CA 02448820 2003-11-10

6
Content of alkaline earth chlorides Moisture absorption of the potash
(MgC12+CaCI2 content) fertiliser granulate*
None (< 0.05% mass) 0.45% mass
0.1 % mass 1.40% mass
0.2% mass 2.55% mass
0.5% mass 5.60% mass
*Standard conditions: 20 C, 70% RH, 8d

Even a content of only 0.1 % mass of alkaline earth chloride results in a very
noticeable
moisture absorption of the potash fertiliser granulate.

In the following, this invention, which has been based on the above quoted
findings, is
described in detail. Firstly, the method according to the invention is
discussed. Details,
which are provided in conjunction with the method according to the invention,
also apply
correspondingly to the product according to the invention and the device
according to
the invention (equivalent in each case, where applicable) and vice versa.

According to the invention, a normal raw granulate of a potash fertiliser
granulate is
used. Preferably, this raw granulate includes the fraction of the grain size
of 1 to 5 mm
quoted at the start. This is first treated with a solution containing silicate
or carbonate.
Such preferred solutions are aqueous solutions, in particular aqueous
solutions
containing silicate of potassium, soda, silicate of sodium or potash.
Preferred solutions
contain the components containing silicate or carbonate in an amount of 5 to
25%
weight, preferabiy 10 to 20% weight and especially 14 to 20% weight. This
solution is
applied to the raw granulate using methods known in technology, for example by
spray
application or by mixing in an intensifier-type mixer. The amount of the
solution to be
used is preferably 1 to 2.5% weight referred to the total mass of raw
granulate and
applied solution, preferably 1.3 to 2.0% weight and particularly preferably
1.5 to 1.8%


CA 02448820 2003-11-10

7
weight. The treatment of the raw granulate with the solution described above
leads to a
transformation of the alkaline earth chlorides contained in the raw granulate
to silicate
compounds or compounds containing carbonate which are not hygroscopic. Due to
this
process stage a substantial reduction of the moisture absorption capabiiity of
the raw
granulate is already obtained. A surprising feature is that a positive effect
can be
obtained due to this type of simple wet chemical reaction, without additional
additives
such as magnesium oxide, calcium oxide, burnt chalk or burnt dolomite having
to be
added to the granulate as suggested in the European patent application
mentioned
above. At the same time the application of the amount of liquid leads to
further binding
of any included fine-grain content so that the application of the liquid as
such
furthermore has a positive effect on the raw granulate.

After application of the solution described above, according to the invention
kinetic
energy is then applied by treatment with vibration. This vibration treatment,
in contrast
to compaction methods which are carried out in presses with high pressures,
involves
relative simple equipment and leads to the required grain deformation. Due to
the rather
point-type energy application by the vibration method, smoothing of the
surface of the
granulate grains is achieved, resulting in rounding of the grains and a
reduction of the
specific surface area. This produces a clearly improved abrasion resistance
with a
simultaneous further reduction of the moisture absorption capacity.

Overall, the positive effect of the stage with treatment of the solution
containing
carbonate or silicate solution is again reinforced by the second stage of the
method
according to the invention and furthermore also the mechanical properties of
the
granulates are improved. Consequently, the abrasion of the granulates during
transport,
loading and unloading is again clearly reduced, the flow properties of the
granulates
under handling are improved and the tendency to hardening during storage is
reduced
by reducing the flat contact points.


CA 02448820 2003-11-10

8
In contrast to compaction where crystal deformation is forced due to high
compression
pressures on the rollers (180 to 300 bar), surprisingly in the method
according to the
invention, the grain deformation of the moistened granulates can be achieved
by
vibrations in the frequency range from 10 to 70 Hz, preferably from 15 to 30
Hz, with
amplitudes from 2 to 20 mm, preferably from 2 to 10 mm and particularly
preferably
from 5 to 8 mm.

It has been found that the moistened granulate should be subjected to a dwell
period in
the vibration treatment zone of 10 to 180 s in order to ensure adequate
compaction.
Longer dwell periods are basically however not detrimental, but rather only
disadvantageous with regard to the economics of the method.

The adequate relatively short dwell periods open up however additional
possibilities for
the integration of the process step of vibration treatment into other process
stages,
which can lead to further simplification of the process and to a reduction in
the
investment and operating costs. For example, it is possible to carry out the
vibration
treatment in a vibration zone which is not made available specially for this
purpose, but
instead to position it in a feed section of a vibration-aided fluidised-bed
dryer.

Taken overall, the method according to the invention comprises the two main
stages of
application of a solution containing carbonate or silicate and the vibration
treatment for
grain deformation and grain compaction as described above.

Following the process steps, essential to the invention and quoted above, the
usual
post-treatments can be carried out which are briefly described below.

Following the vibration treatment, drying of the moistened granulates can take
place.
This drying can be carried out in normal equipment, such as for example,
fluidised-bed
apparatus or in vibration-aided fluidised-bed dryers. Normally the next
process stage


CA 02448820 2003-11-10

9
following drying is cooling, whereby the granulate at a temperature of over
100 C is
cooled to about 40 C and therefore the vapour is extensively extracted.

The following treatment stage of the granulate is normally formed by a coating
with
organic substances, such as for example oils, amines, oil/amine mixtures and
waxes, to
ensure free-flowing properties and the storage capability of the granulates
over still
longer time periods by the partial coating of the granulate surface. The
process controls
and equipment needed for this are known to the skilled person. Coating is
normally
carried out in mixers, as shown in Figure 1 for example. Altematively, the
coating can
be located in a vibration-aided fluidised-bed dryer, as indicated in Figure 2.
To achieve
this, a weir, as shown in Figure 3 and which is adjustable in height, is
provided in the
transition area of drying/cooling with an overhang strip of at least 10 cm
width mounted
in the application direction, under which an airless nozzle device can be
installed which
can also be replaced during the process. The nozzles can be individually
pressure
controlled depending on throughput and adjusted such that the height at about
10 to 15
cm of the granulate fluidised bed is not penetrated. Depending on the
consistency of the
coating agent, melting on may be necessary, e.g. with waxes or tempering with
oil/amine mixtures.

If a coating is provided in the method according to the invention, then this
coating takes
place using the usual organic substances, whereby, for example, palmitin or
stearin
waxes are preferred. Normally, fatty amines with a chain length of 16 to 18 C
atoms,
mineral oils, fatty acids (e.g. palmitin acid) or waxes (e.g. stearin) are
used for an
organic coating. The coated amount is generally I to 3 kg of coating substance
per t of
granulate, preferably about 2 kg of coating substance per t of granulate.

The product according to the invention is explained in more detail in the
following.


CA 02448820 2003-11-10

The potash fertiliser granulate according to the invention is a product which
can be
obtained by the method of this invention described above. This product is
characterised
in that in comparison to the state of the art, the abrasion resistance is
increased and the
moisture absorption reduced, as shown in the following examples.
Simultaneously, the
product according to the invention contains no additionally introduced
additives, as
mentioned at the start, in particular no MgO and no CaO, which are added as
moisture-
absorption inhibiting additives in the European application discussed above.
The
product according to the invention, obtained according to the main process
stages as
described above, exhibits preferably an abrasion value of < 4%, particularly
preferred
< 3.8% and especially preferred < 3%. The abrasion value is determined
according to
the potash standard (works standard KALI 97 - 147, 08/87). This abrasion value
is the
proportion < 0.5 mm in % mass of the amount used, which is determined after
exposure
of the sample material in a vibration device (frequency 240 min'', amplitude
30 mm) in a
pan with 36 steel balls by sieving. The abrasion values according to the Busch
method,
which is also used, are normally on average 10 to 15% below those of the
method
according to the potash standard.

The moisture absorption, measured under standard conditions of a temperature
of
C, a relative humidity of 70%, with a storage period of 8 days, amounts to
preferably
less than 2% with the product according to the invention, particularly
preferably less
than 1.5% and especially preferably less than 1%. By additional application of
the
coating layer describe above, i.e. by partial coating with the organic
substances
described above, the moisture absorption can be reduced still further,
preferably to a
value less than 1.8%, particularly preferably less than 1% and especially
preferably still
less than 0.8%.

These values apply to potash fertiliser granulate which is not partially
coated with a
water repellent organic substance.


CA 02448820 2003-11-10

11
Here, it is surprising that according to the invention the potash fertiliser
granulate does
not need to contain any oxidic additives, such as calcium oxide or magnesium
oxide,
which are described in the European application mentioned above as essential
components for the reduction of the moisture absorption. Since however the
addition of
such materials is associated with the problems described at the start, this
invention
makes an overall improved potash fertiliser granulate available.

The method according to the invention furthermore has the result that, as
described at
the start, the specific surface area of the granulate grains is reduced and
the grain
shape slightly modified. Whereas the usual granulates are angular shapes
running to a
taper (due to the fracture surfaces arising with the usual treatment), the
product of this
invention exhibits a rather rounded grain shape due to the modification of the
granulate
grain area due to the application of kinetic energy by the vibration treatment
process.
Overall, a product results with an improved storage stability, in particular
because the
moisture absorption is reduced which prevents unwanted hardening of the
granulate
(baking). Simultaneously, the production of dust when handling the granulate
is reduced
due to the increased granulate strength, improving the application conditions
and
contributing to improved handling safety.

Overall, the product according to the invention is characterised by a hitherto
unattained
combination of mechanical strength and low moisture absorption, whereby it is
ensured
that no oxidic additives need to be employed.

In the following the device for carrying out the method of this invention is
more precisely
described.

The device according to the invention comprises as the essentiai eiements
first an
apparatus with which the liquid described in conjunction with the method
according to


CA 02448820 2003-11-10

12
the invention (containing carbonate or silicate) is applied to the raw
fertiliser granulate.
This apparatus is preferabiy a mixer in which the raw fertiliser granulate is
moved while
the liquid is added. The addition of the liquid can either occur through an
inlet opening in
the mixer or preferably by spray nozzles provided, whereby an improved
distribution of
the liquid to be applied is achieved. This type of mixer is basically not
restricted, but
intensifier-type mixers are preferred.

The second element of the device according to the invention is a vibration
appliance in
which the raw granulate grains, which are exposed to the liquid, are treated
to apply the
kinetic energy by vibration oscillations. This element of the device according
to the
invention is preferably a vibrating conveyor, equipped such that the raw
fertiliser
granulate grains treated with the liquid are subjected to a frequency of 15 to
70 Hz at an
amplitude of 2 to 20 mm, with a dwell time of 10 to 180 s. The ranges for
these
parameters described above in conjunction with the method according to the
invention
also apply to the device according to the invention. Alternatively, the
apparatus for
applying the kinetic energy is arranged as an entry zone on a vibration-aided
dryer. This
simplifies especially the equipment needed, because normally drying in a dryer
follows
the application of kinetic energy through vibration, for example, a fluidised-
bed dryer or
a vibration-aided dryer.

Optionally, the device of this invention includes furthermore a device for
applying the
above described coating layer of an amine, oil, wax or a mixture of these.
This device,
which can be fitted for example below the dryer unit, is preferably also a
spray nozzle
appliance, provided for example in a weir, adjustable in height, in the
transition
drying/cooling section of a fluidised-bed dryer. The application preferably
occurs by
replaceable airless jetting appliances, whereby the nozzles preferabiy can be
pressure
controlled individually in relation to the throughput. Normally, adjustment is
made such
that the granulate fluidised bed, about 10 to 15 cm high, is not penetrated.
Where
applicable, this unit also includes an apparatus for heating the organic
coating agent to


CA 02448820 2003-11-10

13
be applied, because, for example with waxes, melting on is needed and with
oils or
oil/amine mixtures tempering is required.

This invention is illustrated further based on the following embodiments.
Example 1

A dry potash fertiliser salt raw granulate, produced on a roller press, with a
magnesium
chloride/calcium chloride content of 0.16% is sprayed according to Figure 2 in
a mixer
with a 15% weight soda solution for a feed of 1.5% weight, mixed thoroughly
and
thereby the alkaline earth chlorides are subjected to a transformation
reaction, resulting
in the carbonates. The moistened raw granulate is surface deformed, smoothed
and
compacted in the following vibrating conveyor and also in the entry section of
the
vibrating fluidised-bed dryer. The vibrating conveyor is run at a frequency of
30 Hz and
an amplitude of 5 mm. The granulate is dried in the vibrating fluidised-bed
dryer/cooler
and the dust extracted in the airflow. In the transition section of the
dryer/cooler there is
the jetting appliance with which 2 kg of amine/oil mixture (ratio of amine :
oil = 1:1) is
applied to one tonne of granulate. In technical testing the granulate produced
in this way
exhibits a single grain strength of 36.2 N, an abrasion of 2.8% and a moisture
absorption (standard conditions, as described above) of 0.75%. As a comparison
raw
granulate was treated in accordance with Figure 1. Here, a single grain
strength of 34.1
N, an abrasion of 4.5% and a moisture absorption of 1.90% resulted. The raw
granulate
exhibited a single grain strength of 34.4 N, an abrasion of 6.8% and a
moisture
absorption of 2.05%. It should be pointed out that in this connection, the
values
described above were measured in each case on a granulate on which no
amine/oil
mixture had been applied.

It is therefore apparent that the method according to the invention is able to
provide a
superior potash fertiliser granulate in accordance with this invention which
exhibits an


CA 02448820 2003-11-10

14
increased strength and a reduced moisture absorption compared to the granulate
produced by the usual method, whereby at the same time no additional oxidic
additives
need to be employed.

After application of the amine/oil mixture a moisture absorption in the
product according
to the invention of 0.6% resulted and with the comparison product 1.05%
(whereby the
abrasion values were approximately the same and were about 0.2%).

ExamAle 2

A dry potash fertiliser salt raw granulate, produced on a roller press, with a
magnesium
chloride/calcium chloride content of 0.6% is treated in accordance with Figure
4 in an
intensifier-type mixer or equivalently on a vibrating conveyor with a 20%
weight
potassium metasilicate solution and intensively and thoroughly mixed. The
potassium
metasilicate solution was produced from a potassium metasilicate with a
density of 1.24
to 1.26 g/cm3. The applied amount of solution containing silicate was 1.7%
weight. The
different facilities used in this example, were used alternatively and can be
selected in
practical operation according to constructional prerequisites.

Then the moistened raw granulate was surface deformed and then dried in the
following
vibrating fluidised-bed dryer with a granulate deformation section of at least
1 m and
reduced air feed at a frequency of 18 to 25 Hz at an amplitude of 7 to 8 mm.
The
coating was then applied, in this example with a palmitin melt heated to 80 C
with an
additive amount of 2 kg of paimitin per t of granulate.

Before the application of the paimitin coating, the granulate produced in this
way
exhibits in the technical tests a single grain strength of 32.9 N, an abrasion
of 3.6% and
a moisture absorption of 1.9% (measured in each case in accordance with the
standard


CA 02448820 2003-11-10

method mentioned at the beginning). The comparison granulate, produced in
accordance with Figure 1, exhibited a single grain strength of 28.2 N, an
abrasion of
4.8% and a moisture absorption of 6.2%. The raw granulate showed a single
grain
strength of 31.0 N, an abrasion of 7.9% and a moisture absorption of 6.5%. It
was
therefore found again that the product according to the invention particularly
exhibited a
very substantially reduced moisture absorption.

After application of the paimitin coating the values for the abrasion on the
product
according to the invention and on the comparison product were in each case
approximately equal (0.2%). The moisture absorption was reduced in the
comparison
product to about 4.2%, but in the product according to the invention to 1.6%.

Overall it has been shown that the method according to the invention provides
an
improved potash fertiliser granulate. Since particularly the addition of
oxidic additives
can be omitted, the product is improved with regard to the long-term storage
capability,
because the swelling effects mentioned at the start cannot occur in the
granulate
according to the invention. The device according to the invention is
characterised by a
relatively simple structure and therefore facilitates economical production of
the product
according to the invention and economical implementation of the method
according to
the invention.

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date 2009-07-28
(22) Filed 2003-11-10
Examination Requested 2003-11-10
(41) Open to Public Inspection 2004-05-13
(45) Issued 2009-07-28
Deemed Expired 2016-11-10

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Request for Examination $400.00 2003-11-10
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 2003-11-10
Application Fee $300.00 2003-11-10
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 2 2005-11-10 $100.00 2005-08-04
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 3 2006-11-10 $100.00 2006-09-12
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 4 2007-11-12 $100.00 2007-09-19
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 5 2008-11-10 $200.00 2008-09-30
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 2008-10-14
Final Fee $300.00 2009-05-13
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 6 2009-11-10 $200.00 2009-10-06
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 7 2010-11-10 $200.00 2010-10-05
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 8 2011-11-10 $200.00 2011-10-05
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 9 2012-11-13 $200.00 2012-10-11
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 10 2013-11-12 $250.00 2013-10-10
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 11 2014-11-10 $250.00 2014-10-16
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
K-UTEC AG SALT TECHNOLOGIES
Past Owners on Record
GUENTER, HARALD
HEUCHEL, BARBARA
KALI-UMWELTTECHNIK SONDERSHAUSEN GMBH
KRAUKE, WOLFGANG
LEIB, GERHARD
MARX, HEINRICH
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Abstract 2003-11-10 1 9
Description 2003-11-10 15 767
Claims 2003-11-10 3 82
Drawings 2003-11-10 4 70
Representative Drawing 2004-01-27 1 4
Cover Page 2004-04-16 1 31
Description 2006-09-07 15 772
Claims 2006-09-07 3 83
Claims 2008-03-31 3 81
Cover Page 2009-07-02 1 32
Assignment 2003-11-10 4 130
Correspondence 2003-12-18 1 28
Assignment 2004-04-02 5 140
Fees 2006-09-12 1 47
Prosecution-Amendment 2008-03-31 5 136
Fees 2005-08-04 1 36
Prosecution-Amendment 2006-03-24 3 78
Prosecution-Amendment 2006-09-07 8 252
Prosecution-Amendment 2007-05-09 2 63
Prosecution-Amendment 2007-07-10 4 141
Fees 2007-09-19 1 52
Prosecution-Amendment 2007-11-13 2 85
Assignment 2008-10-14 2 94
Fees 2008-09-30 1 54
Correspondence 2009-05-13 1 54
Fees 2009-10-06 1 60
Fees 2010-10-05 1 56
Fees 2011-10-05 1 53
Fees 2012-10-11 1 59
Fees 2013-10-10 1 63
Fees 2014-10-16 1 56