Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
CA 02453468 2003-12-17
923:0006USU
ENGINEERED FLEXURE COMPONENT
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to an engineered flexure component used at the bolted
interfaces of
precision optical instruments.
2. Description of the Prior Art
For precision structures, such as telescopes, it is important to understand
the sources of
mechanical hysteresis, which is defined as the dependence of the strain of a
material not only on
the instantaneous value of the stress, but also on the previous history of the
stress. It is known
that whenever two structural elements are bolted together, friction exists at
the bolted interface.
Bolted interfaces are a source of both damping and instability. Friction may
be the cause of
energy dissipation as the two surfaces slide past one another as well as cause
the two mating
surfaces to slide and stop in a new position relative to each other. At
present, interface designers
cannot explicitly control the percentages of forces that act across an
interface through friction.
Currently, many optic mounts for precision optical instruments are bolted
directly to an optical
bench. In a high vibrational environment, the optic mounts tend to react to
external forces and
CA 02453468 2003-12-17
923.0006USU
reposition themselves, thus causing the optical instrument to shift their
position. Ciriven the
foregoing, there is a need for an engineered flexure component that is
sufficiently flexible enough
to bend and not slide as the maring surfaces of the bolted interface move
relative to each other.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
A bolt flange is provided with parallel grooves across its surface. One bolt
flange surface
has grooves that run in a vertical direction, while a second bolt flange
surface has grooves that
run in a horizontal direction, such that they are perpendicular to the grooves
of the first bolt
flange mating surface. The purpose of the grooves is to create a surface that
consists of flexures.
These flexures cause two effects to occur at the bolted interface. First, for
a given clamping
force, the resulting surface pressure is greater because of the smaller
contact area at the interface
which in turn increases the friction force. Second, the flexures are
sufficiently flexible enough to
bend and not slide as the two interface surfaces move relative to each other.
The flexure points
may different configurations, i.e. squares, circles, triangles, or other
geometric shapes. The
grooving of the surfaces allows a designer of optical instruments to be
capable of determining the
stiffiiess of the resulting flexure as well as control the percentages of
forces that are transferred
across an interface through friction as compared with elastic bending. The
flexured interface also
allows the designer to invoke load path management design rules. In summary,
load path
management is a process by which a designer can control the effect of friction
by not effecting
the frictional mechanisms, but by changing the elastic stiffness that
surrounds the frictional
2
CA 02453468 2003-12-17
923.0006USU
element. Placing grooves in the interface mating surfaces enables a designer
to model the
interface stiffness as a series of bending beams, which in turn allows the
designer to explicitly
model the percentage of force that acts through friction.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Fig. 1 is a perspective view of the engineered flexure component of the
present invention;
Fig. 2 is a perspective view of an alternative embodiment to the engineered
flexure
component of Fig. 1;
Fig. 3 is an exploded view of a flexured assembly utilizing the embodiment
shown in
Fig.l;
Fig. 4 is an exploded view of a flexured assembly utilizing the alternative
embocliment
shown in Fig. 2;
Fig. 5 is a model showing the force transfer in both the conservative and non-
conservative
load paths that may exist at the interface of a. flexured assembly and
3
CA 02453468 2003-12-17
923.0006USU
Fig. 6 is an illustration of the load paths that exist across the interface of
a flexured
assembly.
DETAILED DESCRIPTI~N OF TIIE DRAWINGS
Referring to the drawings, and in particular, Fig. 1, there is provided a bolt
flange 10
having a front surface 105. Bolt flange 10 is provided with parallel grooves
110 which
transverse front surface 105. As shown in Fig. 1, grooves 110 transverse front
surface 105 in a
vertical direction. As shown in Fig. 3, front surface 105 of a second bolt
flange has grooves
which transverse front surface 105 in a horizontal direction, such that they
are perpendicular to
grooves 110 of the first bolt flange front surface 1 OS when the first and
second bolt flanges are
bolted together creating an interface.
The purpose of grooves 110 is to create a flexure 115 . Flexures 115 cause two
effects to
occux at a bolted interface. First, for a given clamping force, the resulting
surface pressure is
greater because of the smaller contact area at the interface which in turn
increases the coulombic
friction force. Second, flexures 115 provide additional flexibility such that
the percentage of
force transmitted across the interface is reduced. The width and height ~f
flexures 1 l'~ 5 is
determined by the flexure bending stiffness, flexure axial stiffness, flexure
tortional stiffness,
flexure buckling limit and load path management design rules.
4
CA 02453468 2003-12-17
923.0006USU
Fig. 2 is an alternative embodiment in which grooves 110 transverse front
surface 105 in
both the vertical and horizontal directions, creating a cross-hatched
appearance. A.s shown in
Fig. 4, this embodiment is used when the bolt flange comes into with a flat,
smooth surface. In
other alternative embodiments, the flexure points may have different
configurations, i.e. squares,
circles, triangles, or other geometric shapes.
Load path management theory states that it is possible to reduce or tailor the
effect of
interface friction by effecting the elastic mechanisms that surround the
friction element. Due to
the dependency that hysteresis has on the relative magnitudes of stiffness at
an interface, load
path management states that it is possible to reduce the dissipation due to
friction at an interface
not by affecting the friction mechanism, but by changing the relative
magnitudes of stiffness.
This can be achieved by changing the design of the interface to increase the
percentage of load
transferred through internal elastic mechanisms.
When force is transferred across a physical interface, normal and tangential
stresses and
local deformations occur at the interface. When load transfer occurs through
normal stresses at
the interface, the load path is elastic, i.e. conservative. When load transfer
occurs through shear
stress at the interface, friction must be present and thus slippage can occur.
When load transfer
occurs across friction interfaces, it is considered non-conservative. This
force transfer is shown
in the interface model of Fig. 5. This model is comprised of two distinct
segments and is a
representation of the conservative and non-conservative load paths that may
exist at an interface.
S
CA 02453468 2003-12-17
~23.0006USU
The conservative segment of the model represents an interface design for which
there are only
elastic mechanisms (other than material hysteresis) in the load path. The non-
consezvative
segment of the model represents a combination of elastic and friction
mechanisms that exist in a
non-conservative load path. The hysteretic mechanism of the interface is
represented by a
Coulombic friction mechanism which is in parallel with a linear spring element
(kp) as well as in
series with another linear spring element (kS). A Coulombic friction mechanism
was chosen
because it represents the hysteretic mechanics that exist at an interface. A
linear, elastic
mechanism (ke) in parallel with the non-conservative load path represents the
conservative load
path at an interface. The analytical model of Fig. 4 represents such an
interface. This interface
model illustrates how an externally applied load (Fa) may be divided into
elastic (i.e. normal) and
inelastic (i.e. tangential) load path components for load transfer across the
interface. The lce
elastic element of the model represents the elastic behavior of the body from
the application of
the external load to normal stress at the interface. The k~ elastic mechanism
of the model
represents the elastic behavior of the body from the application of the
external load to shear
stress at the interface. Load transfer across the interface is represented by
an elastic mechanism
(kp) in parallel with the friction mechanism ~N. The elastic mechanism kp
represents the portion
of the shear load that is transferred across an interface elastically, i.e.
regions within the contact
area where slip does not occur. The friction mechanism represents the portion
of the shear load
that is transferred across an interface inelastically, i.e. regions within the
contact area where slip
does occur.
6
CA 02453468 2003-12-17
923.0006USU
Using a loss factor analysis, it is shown that if displacement-dependent
friction exists in
the model shown in Fig. 6, it is possible to reduce the friction effect by
changing the relative
magnitudes of internal stiffness such that an ever increasing percentage of
the force is transferred
through internal elastic mechanisms, i.e. load path management. The engineered
flexure
component of the present invention involves changing the value of ks, the
elastic spring constant
associated with the elastic behavior of the body from the application of the
external load to the
shear stress at the interface. Reducing the spring stiffness ks reduces the
percentage of force that
acts through elastic mechanisms. This changing of the local interface between
the mating
surfaces of structural elements allows the mating surfaces to return to their
original position
because the flexure points bend, but do not slide with respect to each other.
The present invention having been described with particular reference to the
preferred
forms thereof, it will be obvious that various changes and modifications may
be made without
departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the
appended claims.
7
