Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
CA 02463378 2004-04-06
WO 03/106736 PCT/US02/33911
ELECTROLYTIC PROCESS AND APPARATUS
BAGI~GROUND OF INVENTION
This disclosure relates to electrolysis and more particularly, relates to
improved
electrolytic processes and apparatuses for the oxidation of inorganic or
organic species.
With the decline of gaseous chlorine as a microbiocide, various alternatives
have been explored, including bleach, bleach with bromide, bromo-
chlorodimethyl
hydantoin, ozone, and chlorine dioxide (C102). Of these, chlorine dioxide has
generated a great deal of interest for control of microbiological growth in a
number of
different industries, including the dairy industry, the beverage industry, the
pulp and
paper industries, the fruit and vegetable processing industries, various
canning plants,
the poulhy industry, the beef processing industry and miscellaneous other food
processing applications. Chlorine dioxide is also seeing increased use in
municipal
potable water treatment facilities and in industrial waste treatment
facilities, because of
its selectivity towards specific environmentally-objectionable waste
materials,
including phenols, sulfides, cyanides, thiosulfates, and mercaptans. In
addition,
chlorine dioxide is being used in the oil and gas industry for downhole
applications as a
well stimulation enhancement additive.
Unlil~e chlorine, chlorine dioxide remains a gas when dissolved in aqueous
solutions and does not ionize to form wealc acids. This property is at least
partly
responsible for the biocidal effectiveness of chlorine dioxide over a wide pH
range, and
males it a logical choice for systems that operate at alkaline pH or that have
poor pH
control. Moreover, chlorine dioxide is a lughly effective microbiocide at
concentrations as low as 0.1 parts per million (ppm) over a wide pH range.
CA 02463378 2004-04-06
WO 03/106736 PCT/US02/33911
2
The biocidal activity of chlorine dioxide is believed to be due to its ability
to
penetrate bacterial cell walls and react with essential amino acids within the
cell
cytoplasm to disrupt cell metabolism. This mechansm is more efficient than
other
oxidizers that "burn" on contact and is highly effective against legionella,
algae and
amoebal cysts, giardia cysts, coliforms, salmonella, shigella, and
cryptosporidium.
Unfortunately, chlorine dioxide in solution is unstable with an extremely
short
shelf life and thus, is not commercially available. Chlorine dioxide must
typically be
generated at its point of use such as, for example, by a reaction between a
metal
chlorate or metal chlorite in aqueous solution and a strong acid.
Electrochemical processes provide a means for generating chlorine dioxide for
point of use applications. For example, U.S. Patent No. 5,419,816 to Sampson
et al.
describes a packed bed ion exchange electrolytic system and process for
oxidizing
species in dilute aqueous solutions by passing the species through an
electrolytic
reactor packed with a monobed of modified cation exchange material. A similar
electrolytic process is described in U.S. Patent No. 5,609,742 to Sampson et
al. for
reducing species using a monobed of modified anion exchange.
One difficulty with electrochemical processes is that it can be difficult to
control
the generation of undesirable species. For example, there are many
electrochemical
reactions that can occur at the anode. Within a potential range of 0.90 to
2.10 volts, at
least eight different reactions are thermodynamically possible, producing
products such
as chlorate (C103-), perchlorate (C104 ), chlorous acid (HC102), oxygen (0a),
hydrogen
peroxide (HZOZ) and ozone (03). It is highly desirable axed a significant
commercial
advantage to achieve high yield efficiency without producing these undesirable
side
reactions.
Chlorine dioxide has also been produced from a chlorine dioxide precursor
solution by contacting the precursor solution with a catalyst (e.g., catalysts
containing a
metal such as described for example in U.S. Pat. No. 5,008,096) in the absence
of an
electrical field or electrochemical cell. However, known catalytic processes
have the
disadvantage of becoming greatly deactivated within a matter of days.
Moreover, it has
been found that the support materials for the catalytic sites tend to quiclcly
degrade due
to the oxidizing nature of chlorine dioxide. Still further, the use of
catalyst materials in
packed columns or beds for generating chlorine dioxide has been found to cause
a
significant pressure drop across the column or form channels within the column
that
CA 02463378 2004-04-06
WO 03/106736 PCT/US02/33911
3
results in a significant decrease in conversion efficiency from the chlorine
dioxide
precursor to chlorine dioxide.
SUMMARY OF INVENTION
An electrolytic reactor for the electrocatalytic oxidation of chlorite ions in
an
aqueous solution comprises an anode; a cathode; and a particulate catalyst
material.
In another embodiment, an electrolytic reactor for the oxidation of chlorite
ions
in an aqueous solution comprises an anode compartment comprising an anode and
a
catalyst material; and a cathode compartment comprising a cathode.
In another embodiment, an electrolytic reactor for the oxidation of chlorite
ions
in an aqueous solution comprises an anode compartment comprising an anode; a
cathode compartment comprising a cathode; and a central compartment disposed
between the anode and cathode compartments, wherein the central compartment
comprises a catalyst material.
In another embodiment, an electrolytic reactor for the oxidation of chlorite
ions
in an aqueous solution comprises an anode compartment comprising an anode; a
cathode compartment comprising a cathode; and a central compartment disposed
between the anode and cathode compartments, wherein the central compartment
comprises a catalyst material, and wherein a non-permselective membrane
separates the
anode compartment from the central compartment.
A process for fabricating a ceramic catalyst material comprises dissolving a
metal oxide precursor into a solution; adding an additive consisting of anions
or cations
to the solution; coating a ceramic particle with the solution; and heating the
coated
ceramic particle to a temperature effective to form a metal oxide.
A process for generating chlorine dioxide from an alkali metal chlorite
solution
comprises applying a current to the electrolytic reactor, wherein the
electrolytic reactor
includes an anode, a cathode, and a catalyst material; flowing an aqueous
alkali metal
chlorite solution into the electrolytic reactor; and contacting the alkali
metal chlorite
solution with the catalyst material to electrocatalytically produce an
effluent containing
chlorine dioxide.
In another embodiment, a process for generating chlorine dioxide from an
alkali
metal chlorite solution includes applying a current to an electrolytic reactor
including
an anode compartment comprising an anode and a catalyst material; and a
cathode
CA 02463378 2004-04-06
WO 03/106736 PCT/US02/33911
4
compartment comprising a cathode; flowing an aqueous allcali metal chlorite
solution
into the electrolytic reactor; and contacting the all~ali metal chlorite
solution with the
catalyst material to electrocatalytically produce an effluent containing
chlorine dioxide.
In another embodiment, a process for generating chlorine dioxide from an
alkali
metal chlorite solution comprises applying a current to an electrolytic
wherein the
electrolytic reactor includes an anode compartment comprising an anode, a
cathode
compartment comprising a cathode, and a central compartment disposed between
the
anode and cathode compartments, wherein the central compartment comprises a
catalyst material; flowing water into the anode compartment and generating
hydrogen
atoms; passing the hydrogen atoms into the central compartment; flowing the
alkali
metal chlorite solution into the central compartment; and contacting the
allcali metal
chlorite solution with the catalyst material to produce an effluent containing
chlorine
dioxide.
In another embodiment, a process for generating chlorine dioxide from a dilute
allcali metal chlorite solution comprises applying a current to an
electrolytic reactor,
wherein the electrolytic reactor comprises an anode compartment comprising an
anode,
a cathode compartment comprising a cathode, and a central compartment disposed
between the anode and cathode compartments, wherein the central compartment
comprises a catalyst material, and wherein a non-permselective membrane
separates the
anode compartment from the central compartment; flowing water into the anode
compartment and generating hydrogen atoms; passing the hydrogen atoms into the
central compartment; flowing the dilute alkali metal chlorite solution into
the central
compartment; and contacting the dilute alkali metal chlorite solution with the
catalyst
material to produce an effluent containing chlorine dioxide.
The above described and other features will become better understood from the
detailed description that is described in conjunction with the accompanying
drawings.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
Referring now to the figures wherein the like elements are numbered alike:
Figure 1 shows a cross sectional view illustrating a packed bed electrolytic
reactor;
Figure 2 shows a partial cross sectional view illustrating the anode
compartment
of Figure 1, wherein the particulate material is layered;
CA 02463378 2004-04-06
WO 03/106736 PCT/US02/33911
Figure 3 shows a cross sectional view illustrating another pacleed bed
electrolytic reactor;
Figure 4 shows a partial cross sectional view illustrating the central
compartment of Figure 3, wherein the particulate material is layered;
5 Figure SA and SB show an exploded isometric view of an electrolytic reactor
cassette;
Figure 6 is a graph showing a pressure drop of an electrolytic reactor as a
function of time for different catalyst support materials;
Figure 7 is a graph showing conversion efficiency of an electrolytic reactor
as a
function of time during the electrolytic production of chlorine dioxide from
aaz aqueous
sodium chlorite feed solution;
Figure 8 is a graph showing a comparison of conversion efficiencies for
different electrolytic reactors; and
Figure 9 is a graph showing a comparison of the applied voltage level as a
function of time for different electrolytic reactors.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
Referring now to Figure 1, wherein like elements are numbered alil~e, there is
shown a cross-sectional view illustrating an electrolytic reactor 10. The
electrolytic
reactor 10 includes an anode 12 and a cathode 14 in electrical communication
with a
source of direct current 15 (DC). W terposed between the anode 12 and the
cathode 14
exists at least one compartment 16 of particulate material 18. As used herein,
the term
"particulate material" refers to a cation exchange material and/or a catalyst
material.
The particulate material 18 in compartment 16 includes the catalyst material
or a
mixture of the catalyst material and the canon exchange material.
In a preferred embodiment, the particulate material 18 is layered within
compartment 16. The term "layer" refers to discrete portions within
compartment 16,
each layer possessing its own physical properties and through which the
aqueous feed
solution passes sequentially. The number of layers can vary. Preferably, the
total
number of layers is about 1 to about 12, with about 2 to about 6 more
preferred and
with about 3 to about 4 most preferred. For example, as shown in Figure 2, the
particulate material 18 may be layered in the anode compartment 16 in layers
26, 28,
and 30. Although layers, 26, 28, and 30 are shown as having relatively similar
CA 02463378 2004-04-06
WO 03/106736 PCT/US02/33911
6
dimensions, different dimensions for each layer are contemplated and may be
preferable depending on the particular application. Preferably, the bottommost
layer 30
is filled with the canon exchange material, the middlemost layer 28 is about
an equal
mixture of the catalyst material and the cation exchange material, and the
uppermost
layer 26 is filled with the catalyst material. In this configuration, it is
preferred that the
solution flow upwardly through the particulate material 18 from the bottommost
layers
30 to the uppermost layers 26.
It is optional whether or not the electrolytic reactor 10 includes a cathode
compartment 22. In the event the cathode compartment 22 is present, a membrane
20
preferably separates the anode compartment 16 from the cathode compartment 22.
As
used herein, the term "membrane" refers to a sheet for separating the
particulate matter
from passing from one compartment to the other. In this regard, the term
"membrane"
can be used interchangeably with screen, diaphragm, partition, barrier, a
sheet, a foam,
a sponge-like structure, a canvas, and the like. The membrane can be chosen to
be
permselective, e.g., a cation exchange membrane or can be chosen to be non-
permselective, e.g., a porous membrane. As used herein, the term
"permselective"
refers to a selective permeation of commonly charged ionic species through the
membrane with respect to other diffusing or migrating ionic species having a
different
charge in a mixture. In contrast, the term "non-permselective" generally
refers to a
porous structure that does not discriminate among differently charged ionic
species as
the species pass through the porous structure, i.e., the membrane is non-
selective with
respect to ionic species. For example, in a permselective membrane such as a
cation
exchange membrane, cations can freely pass through the membrane whereas the
passage of anions is prevented. In contrast, in a non-permselective membrane
such as a
porous membrane, the passage of anions and cations through the porous membrane
are
controlled by diffusion.
The cathode compartment 22 may or may not contain particulate material. If
the cathode compartment 22 contains particulate material, as 24 shown in
Figure 1, the
cathode compartment 22 may be configured to possess its own physical
properties (i.e.,
different properties from the particulate material 18 disposed in compartment
16)
through which an aqueous solution can pass without entering adjacent
compartment 16.
Preferably, the particulate material 24 in the cathode compartment 22
comprises a
cation exchange material.
CA 02463378 2004-04-06
WO 03/106736 PCT/US02/33911
7
An additive or additives, such as electrically conductive particles, may also
be
interspersed with the particulate materials 18, 24, to achieve certain
results.
Refernng now to Figure 3, there is shov~m a cross-sectional view illustrating
an
electrolytic reactor 100 including an anode compartment 102, a central
compartment
104 and a cathode compartment 106. As shown, the central compartment 104 is
interposed between the anode and cathode compartments 102, 106, respectively,
and is
separated from compartments 102, 106 by membranes 116, 118. As previously
described, the membranes employed in the reactor may be a permselective
membrane, a
non-permselective membrane, or a combination of permselective and non-
uen"~PWctive membranes. In one embodiment, the membrane 116 separating the
_~---.___ _~,_~
anode compartment 102 from the central compartment 104 is selected to be non-
permselective. In yet another embodiment, the membranes 116, 118 separating
the
central compartment 104 from the adjacent anode and cathode compartments 102,
106,
respectively, are selected to be non-permselective membranes.
15 The anode compartment 102 includes an anode 112 and preferably, is filled
with particulate material 108. The cathode compartment 106 includes a cathode
114
and preferably, is filled with particulate material 108. The anode 112 and the
cathode
114 are in electrical communication with a source of direct current 115 (DC).
The
central compartment 104 is filled with particulate material 108.
20 In one embodiment, the central compartment 104 is filled with the catalyst
material or a mixture of the catalyst material and the cation exchange
material.
In another embodiment, the anode and cathode compartments 102, 106 are
filled with the cation exchange material and the central compartment 104 is
filled with
the catalyst material or a mixture of the catalyst material and the cation
exchange
25 material.
In another embodiment, each compartment 102, 104, and 106 includes the
catalyst material or a mixture of the catalyst material and the canon exchange
material.
In a preferred embodiment, the particulate material 108 in the central
compartment 104 is arranged in layers. As previously discussed, the number of
layers
30 can vary. Preferably, the total number of layers is about 1 to about 12,
with about 2 to
about 6 more preferred, and about 3 to about 4 even more preferred. For
example, as
shown in Figure 4, the particulate material 108 may be layered in the central
compartment 104 in three equal layers 109, 110, and 111. Preferably, the
bottommost
CA 02463378 2004-04-06
WO 03/106736 PCT/US02/33911
8
layer 111 is filled with cation exchange material, the middlemost layer 110 is
filled
with about an equal mixture of catalyst material and canon exchange material,
and the
uppermost layer 109 is filled with catalyst material. In this configuration,
it is preferred
that the solution flow upwardly through the particulate material from the
bottommost
layer 111 to the uppermost layer 109.
Refernng now to Figures SA and SB, there is shown an exploded isometric view
of an exemplary electrolytic reactor cassette 130 employing the three
compartments
102, 104, 106, shown in Figure 2. The cassette is formed from stock materials
that are
preferably chemically inert and non-conductive. Components forming the
cassette may
be molded for high volume production or alternatively, may be machined as
described
in further detail below.
The exemplary cassette 130 is configured for producing about 5 grams per hour
of chlorine dioxide and is fabricated from two pieces of flat stock 120 and
122, about 4
inches across by about 14 inches long by about 1 inch thick. The pieces 120,
122 are
machined such that depressions 1/4 inch deep by 2 inches across by 12 inches
long are
cut in the center of each piece. The pieces 120, 122 are then drilled and
tapped to
accept the anode 112 and cathode 114. Each piece further includes fittings
124, 125,
128 and 129, through which fluid would flow. The anode 112 and cathode 114 are
approximately 2 inches across by 9 inches long and are inserted into the stock
pieces
120 and 122. Membranes 116, 118 (permselective and/or non-permselective
depending
on the desired application) are disposed over each depression formed in stock
pieces
120, 122. Approximately 150 ml of particulate material (not shown) may be
packed
into each depression to form the anode compartment 102 and the cathode
compartment
106, respectively (as shown in Figure 2). As constructed, the particulate
material, if
present, is configured to be in direct contact with the anode 112 or cathode
114.
Interposed between the membranes 116, 118 is a piece of flat stock 134, about
4
inches across by about 14 inches long by 1 inch thick. The stoclc piece 134 is
machined
such that a hole about 2 inches across by 12 inches long is cut through the
piece to form
the central compartment 104 (as shown in Figure 2). The piece 134 is then
drilled and
tapped to accept two fittings 126 and 127 through which fluid would flow. The
central
compartment 134 is filled with about 150 ml of particulate material that
includes the
catalyst material. The components of the electrolytic reactor cassette 130 are
assembled and bolted together, or otherwise secured. In this configuration,
the species
CA 02463378 2004-04-06
WO 03/106736 PCT/US02/33911
9
to be oxidized are preferably passed through the central compartment 104 and
are not in
direct contact with the anode 112 or cathode 114.
In a preferred embodiment, the cassette 130 is formed from an acrylonitrile-
butadiene-styrene (ABS) terpolymer. Other suitable materials include
polyvinylchloride (PVC), chlorinated PVC, polyvinylidene difluoride,
polytetrafluoroethylene and other fluoropolymer materials.
While the arrangements of anode, cathode, and packed bed electrolytic reactors
illustrated in Figures 1, 2, and 3 are presently considered preferable, any
arrangement in
which a sufficient quantity of particulate material (including catalyst
material) is
packed between the anode and cathode in an electrolytic reactor or in at least
one of the
compartments of a divided electrolytic reactor can be used. Other embodiments
include, but are not limited to, separation of the anode and cathode
compartments to
control intermixing of gases and solutions and provision of any number of
packed-bed
compartments separated by membranes placed between the anode and cathode to
affect
other oxidation, reduction or displacement reactions.
The anodes 12, 112 and the cathodes 14, 114 may be made of any suitable
material based primarily on the intended use of the electrolytic reactor,
costs and
chemical stability. For example, the anode may be made of a conductive
material, such
as ruthenium, iridium, titanium, platinum, vanadium, tungsten, tantalum,
oxides of at
least one of the foregoing, combinations including at least one of the
foregoing, and the
like. Preferably, the anode comprises a metal oxide catalyst material disposed
on a
suitable support. The supports are typically in the form of a sheet, screen,
or the like
and are formed from a rigid material such as titanium, niobium, and the like.
The
cathode may be made from stainless steel, steel or may be made from the same
material
as the anode.
Permselective membranes, e.g., 20, 116, 118, preferably contain acidic groups
so that ions with a positive charge can be attracted and selectively passed
through the
membrane in preference to anions. Preferably, the permselective membrane
contains
strongly acidic groups, such as R-503 and is resistant to oxidation and
temperature
effects. In a preferred embodiment, the permselective membranes are
fluoropolymers
that are substantially chemically inert to chlorine dioxide and the materials
or
environment used to produce the chlorine dioxide. Examples of suitable
pennselective
membranes include perfluorosulfonate canon exchange membranes commercially
CA 02463378 2004-04-06
WO 03/106736 PCT/US02/33911
available under the trade name NAFION commercially available from E.I. duPont
de
Nemours, Wilmington, DE.
Non-permselective membranes e.g., 20, 116, 118, contain pores that permit the
non-selective diffusion of ionic species as well as non-ionic species from one
5 compartment to the other so long as the species can physically pass through
the pores.
The non-permselective membrane is preferably selected such that the size of
the pores
is smaller than the particle size of the particulate material disposed in the
compartments. Preferably, the pore size is greater than or equal to about 0.25
millimeters (mm), with greater than or equal to about 0.3 mm even more
preferred, and
10 with greater than or equal to about 0.4 mm most preferred. Also preferred,
is a pore
size less than or equal to about 2.8 mm, with less than or equal to about 1.4
mm more
preferred, and with less than or equal to about 0.6 mm most preferred. While
not
wanting to be bound by theory, it is believed that the pore size contributes
to the
hygroscopic properties of the membrane and minimizes free movement of a liquid
through the membrane by convection, wherein the membrane becomes more
hygroscopic as the pore size decreases.
Preferably, the non-permselective membrane comprises a polymer that is
chemically inert to conditions in the electrolytic reactor and has the
capability of
allowing ionic and non-ionic species to diffuse there through. Preferred
polymers
include polyolefms and halogenated polymers because of their resistance to
hydrolysis
and oxidation. Preferred polyolefms include high-density polyethylene,
polypropylene,
and ethylene-propylene copolymers. Preferred halogenated polymers include
fluorinated polyvinyl) polymers such as, for example, polytetrafluoroethylene,
fluorinated ethylene propylene copolymers, perfluoropropylallcoxy copolymers,
perfluormethylallcoxy copolymers, polychlorotrifluoroethylene copolymers,
ethylene
tetrafluoroethylene polymers, polyvinylidene fluoride polymers, and the like.
Preferred
chlorinated polymers include polyvinylchloride, chlorinated polyvinyl chloride
and the
like.
As previously noted, the term "particulate material" (e.g., 18, 24, 108)
refers to
the cation exchange material and/or the catalyst support material. The cation
exchange
material is preferably an oxidizing exchanger, i.e., a cation exchange resin.
During
operation of the electrolytic reactor 10, 100, 130, it is hypothesized that
the function of
the cation exchange material includes, among others, electro-actively
exchanging or
CA 02463378 2004-04-06
WO 03/106736 PCT/US02/33911
11
adsorbing alkali metal ions from an aqueous alkali metal chlorite solution and
releasing
hydrogen ions. The released hydrogen ions can then be used to regenerate the
cation
exchange material back to the hydrogen form thereby releasing alkali metal
ions or the
like that may then pass into the cathode compartment, if present. The use of
the cation
exchange material is especially useful when feeding a dilute alkali metal
chlorite
solution into compartment 16 or 104, as it helps lower the voltage within the
compartment and increases conversion efficiency. The term "dilute" refers to
aqueous
alkali metal chlorite solutions containing less than about 10,000 milligrams
allcali metal
chlorite per liter of solution (mg/L), preferably less than about 5,000 mg/L,
and more
preferably less than about 1,500 mg/L.
Examples of suitable canon exchange materials include, but are not intended to
be limited to, polystyrene divinylbenzene cross-linked cation exchangers
(e.g., strong
acid types, weak acid types, iminodiacetic acid types, chelating selective
cation
exchangers and the lilce); strong acid perfluorosulfonated canon exchangers;
naturally
occurring cation exchangers, such as manganese greensand; high surface area
macro-
reticular or microporous type ion exchange resins having sufficient ion
conductivity,
and the like. For example, strong acid type exchange materials suitable for
use are
cormnercially available from Mitsubishi Chemical under the trade names Diaion
SIB l 16
and Diaion SK104. Optionally, the cation exchange material may be further
modified,
wherein a portion of the ionic sites are converted to semiconductor junctions,
such as
described in U.S. Patent Nos. 6,024,850, 5,419,816, 5,705,050 and 5,609,742,
herein
incorporated by reference in their entireties. In a preferred embodiment, the
cation
exchange materials have a cross-linl~ing density greater than about 8 %, with
greater
than about 12 % more preferred and with greater than about 16 % even more
preferred.
Increasing the cross-lining density of the cation exchange materials has been
found to
increase the resistance of the canon exchange materials to oxidation and
degradation.
As a result, operating lifetimes for the electrolytic reactor can
advantageously be
extended during use for the production of strongly oxidizing products such as
chlorine
dioxide.
The particulate cation exchange material may also include electrically
conductive particles, such as carbon and the like. The electrically conductive
particles
can be used to affect the transfer of DC current from the electrode to the
membrane.
For example, the use of electrically conductive particles can be used to lower
the
CA 02463378 2004-04-06
WO 03/106736 PCT/US02/33911
12
electrical resistance within the compartment. However, some additives, such as
carbon,
are prone to disintegration in acidic environments, thus requiring careful
selection.
The packing density and conductivity of the cation exchange material within
the
compartment can be adjusted depending on the operating parameters and desired
performance for the electrolytic reactors 10, 100, 130. For example, the
cation
exchange material may be shrunlc before use in the electrolytic reactor, such
as by
dehydration or electrolyte adsorption. Dehydration may be by any method in
which
moisture is removed from the ion exchange material, for example, using a
drying oven.
It has been found that dehydration prior to paclcing can increase the packing
density by
as much as 40 %. Electrolyte adsorption involves soaking the material in a
salt
solution, such as sodium chloride. The paclcing density of the material so
treated can
be increased by as much as 20 %. The increase in packing density
advantageously
increases the volume in which the DC current travels, thus reducing the
electrical
resistance in the electrolytic reactor.
The catalyst material preferably comprises a support and an active metal
catalyst. Preferably, the active metal catalyst is finely and discretely
deposited onto the
support. While not wanting to be bound by theory, it is believed that the
active metal
catalyst adsorbs hydrogen atoms without reacting with the hydrogen atoms,
which form
stable hydrides. Preferably, the active metal catalyst does not adsorb
hydrogen atoms
into its crystal lattice since this will decrease its catalytic activity. In a
preferred
embodiment, the active metal catalyst is a noble metal and does not react or
dissolve
with any of the components or solutions used in the electrolytic reactor 10,
100. While
not wanting to be bound by theory, it is believed that the catalytic activity
of the active
metal is associated with crystal imperfections and the finely divided deposits
help to
increase the surface area as well as increase the number of active catalytic
sites.
Suitable active metal catalysts include, but are not limited to, ruthenium,
platinum,
palladium, osmium, iridium, rhodium, titanium, manganese, lead, zirconium,
niobium,
tantalum, tungsten, tin, and composites or mixtures or alloys or oxides of at
least one of
the foregoing metal catalysts. Preferably, the active metal catalyst is an
oxide of a
metal selected from the group consisting of ruthenium, platinum, palladium,
osmium,
iridium, and rhodium. More preferably, the active metal catalyst is a platinum
oxide.
In another embodiment, the active metal catalyst is a combination of an oxide
of
ruthenium, platinum, palladium, osmium, iridium, rhodium or mixtures or alloys
of at
CA 02463378 2004-04-06
WO 03/106736 PCT/US02/33911
13
least one of the foregoing and a less active oxide of a metal including
titanium, lead,
manganese, zirconium, niobium, tantalum, tungsten, tin or mixtures or alloys
of at least
one of the foregoing. Preferably, the molar ratio of the active metal catalyst
to the less
active metal catalyst is of about 0.3 : 1 to about 100 : 1. More preferably,
the molar
ratio of the active metal catalyst to the less active metal catalyst is about
10 : 1.
Preparation of the catalyst material generally includes contacting the support
with a catalyst precursor to form the active metal catalyst sites, for
example, a catalyst
precursor salt. In one embodiment, a metal oxide precursor salt is dissolved
in an
aqueous solution including an alcohol, and the solution is coated onto the
support.
Suitable alcohols include methanol, ethanol, isopropanol, propanol, butanol,
combinations including at least one of the foregoing alcohols, and the like.
In a
preferred embodiment, the metal oxide precursor salt is dissolved in
isopropanol and
deionized water solution. The amount of alcohol used in the solution is
dependent on
the solubility of the metal oxide precursor salt, wherein the volume fraction
of alcohol
in an aqueous solution is about 30 to about 90 % (v/v), with about 40 to about
80
(v/v) preferred and with about 50 to about 60 % (v/v) more preferred.
Depending on the desired properties, a solution of the metal oxide precursor
salt
may contain further additives, for example, ions that increase the solubility
of the metal
oxide precursor. Suitable ions include hydroxides, chlorides, phosphates,
sulfates,
ammonium, potassium, sodium, lithium or the like. Preferably, the additive is
ammonium hydroxide. The weight fraction of additive in the solution is about
0.1 to
about 10 % (w/v), with about 0.5 to about 5 % (w/v) preferred and with about 1
(w/v) more preferred.
Alternatively, the metal catalyst may be deposited onto the support material
using other techniques such as impregnation, co-precipitation, ion exchange,
dipping,
spray coating, vacuum deposition, sputtering or the like. Preferably, the
amount of
metal catalyst deposited onto the support is about 0.01 to about 100-weight %,
with
about 0.01 to about 10-weight % more preferred, and with about 0.05 to about 2-
weight
most preferred. In addition, it has been found that the catalyst activity of
the catalyst
material is improved with multiple depositions, i.e., the metal oxide
precursor solution
is applied by several individual depositions. Preferably, the number of
depositions is
about 2 to about 12, with the number of depositions of about 2 to about 3 more
preferred.
CA 02463378 2004-04-06
WO 03/106736 PCT/US02/33911
14
The metal deposited onto the support by the precursor solution is then
thermally
or chemically oxidizef to the oxide form. When utilizing a thermal process,
adjusting
the temperature can control the extent of oxidation. The support is preferably
thermally
stable to the oxidation temperatures employed. The oxidation temperatures are
preferably about 200°C to about 1000°C, with about 400°C
to about 800°C more
preferred, and with about 500°C to about 700°C even more
preferred. Suitable
chemical oxidants include permanganate. The extent of oxidation may be
increased
when a multiple deposition process is used in contrast to a single deposition
process.
Suitable supports for the catalyst material include metals, zeolites,
anthracite,
glauconite, faujasite, mordenite, clinoptilolite, aluminas, silicas, clays,
ceramics, carbon
and the life. Of these supports, ceramics are most preferred. In a preferred
embodiment, the catalyst materials are made from those ceramics described in
U.S.
Patents 4,725,390 and 4,632,876, herein incorporated by reference in their
entireties.
Preferred ceramics are those made essentially from nonmetallic minerals (such
as
mineral clays) by firing at an elevated temperature. More preferred are
ceramic
materials commercially available under the trade name MACROLITE" by the
Kinetico
Company. The MACROLITE° ceramic materials are spherically shaped
and
characterized by having a rough texture, high surface area, and level of
moisture
absorption of less than about 0.5%. The low level of moisture absorption
allows for the
metal oxide precursor solution to penetrate a minimal depth into the surface
of the
ceramic, thereby depositing metal onto the external surface of the support, an
optimum
location for subsequent contact with an aqueous solution. The surface area of
the
MACROLITE~ ceramic materials is believed to be on the order of about 103 m2
per
gram.
The process for malting ceramic support materials, such as the
MACROLITE°
material, generally includes the following steps. In the first step, mineral
particulate,
binder, silicon carbide, and parting agent are mixed and spheroidized in order
to form
unfired spheroids. One example of mineral particulates contains: 60%
orthoclase, 10%
nepheline, 10% hornblende, 5% diopside, 15% accessory minerals (titanite,
apatite,
magnetite and biotite) and trace amounts of secondary minerals (e.g.
lcaolinite and
analcite). Another example contains approximately 75% plagioclase and
orthoclase
feldspar and 25% of the minerals pyroxene, hornblende, magnetite and quartz of
which
magnetite is less than 5%. Byproduct mineral fines of perlite (containing 2-5%
CA 02463378 2004-04-06
WO 03/106736 PCT/US02/33911
chemically bound water) will also function as the mineral particulates.
Minerals
containing chemically bound water or sulfur, which are useful components of
the
mineral particulates, are hornblende, apatite, biotite, pyrite, vermiculite
and perlite.
Binders that may be useful as raw materials include bentonite starch,
polyvinyl
alcohol, cellulose gum, polyvinyl acetate and sodium lignosulphonate. The
amount of
binder may generally comprise about 1 to about 5% by weight of the dry
materials fed
to the mixer and is generally sufficient to permit screening and handling of
the
spheroids without significant attrition or breakage.
Suitable parting agents include magnesium oxide, zircon, diaspore and high
10 alumina clays as well as other surface metal oxides.
The spheroids are then dried at a temperature of about 40°C to about
200°C and
typically screened. The ceramic spheroids are then over-fired in a kiln, which
allows
for the formation of the internal air cells, making the finished product less
dense. The
firing atmosphere is typically air. The silicon carbide in the spheroids is
oxidized
15 during firing, the SiC near the surface being more extensively oxidized
than that in the
core.
The product from the lciln is screened using standard methods knomi to those
skilled in the art. Either before, during or after the screening step, the
fired spheroids
may be subjected to vigorous agitation by air or some other agitation means or
to a
water washing step in order to remove dust from their surfaces. The support
material is
then coated with an active metal catalyst in the manner previously described.
The particulate material, i.e., the cation exchange material or the catalyst
material, is not intended to be limited to any particular shape. Suitable
shapes include
rods, extrudates, tablets, pills, irregular shaped particles, spheres,
spheroids, capsules,
discs, pellets or the like. In a preferred embodiment, the particulate
material is
spherical. More preferably, the particulate material includes a reticulated
and textured
surface having an increased surface area. The size of the particulate material
is
dependent on the acceptable pressure drop across the bed of particulate
material. The
smaller the particulate material, the greater the pressure drop.
The size of the particulate material is generally defined by a mesh size of a
sieve in which the particles are screened. For example, a 30 mesh sieve will
allow
particles less than about 600 micrometers to pass through the sieve, whereas
particles
about 600 micrometers or larger than will not pass through. Generally, sieves
of
CA 02463378 2004-04-06
WO 03/106736 PCT/US02/33911
16
varying mesh ratings are stacked and particles are separated using methods
well known
to those skilled in the art. The range of particles separated is defined by
the mesh size
of the sieves used. For example, a mesh size designation of 20/40 means that
substantially all particles have a size ranging from 20 to 40 mesh (about 841
to about
420 micrometers in diameter). A 30/50 designation indicates that substantially
all
particles have a size ranging from 30 to 50 mesh (about 595 to about 297
micrometers
in diameter). The sizes of the particulate matter are preferably smaller than
7 mesh
(about 2800 micrometers in diameter), with smaller than 14 mesh (about 1400
micrometers in diameter) more preferred, and with smaller than 30 mesh (about
595
micrometers in diameter) even more preferred. Also preferred are particulate
sizes
greater than 60 mesh (about 250 micrometers in diameter), with greater than 50
mesh
(about 297 micrometers in diameter) more preferred, and greater than 40 mesh
(about
425 micrometers) even more preferred.
In a preferred mode of operation, a dilute aqueous feed solution of an all~ali
metal chlorite solution is passed through a selected compartment of the
electrolytic
reactor to generate an effluent containing chlorine dioxide. For example, in
electrolytic
reactor 100, the alkali metal chlorite solution preferably flows through
central
compartment 104. Water flows through the cathode and anode compartments 102,
106,
respectively. Preferably, the water is deionized. As a current is applied to
the reactor
100, the anode compartment 102 oxidizes the water to generate, among others,
hydrogen ions whereas the cathode compartment 106 reduces the water to
generate,
among others, hydroxyl ions. The hydrogen ions generated in the anode
compartment
102 can diffuse through membrane 116 into the central compartment 104. The
hydrogen ions can be used to regenerate the cation exchange resin, if present,
within the
central compartment 104. Oxidation of the dissociated hydrogen ions into
hydrogen
atoms transpires so that the electrochemical oxidation of chlorite ions to
chlorine
dioxide can occur. The applied current to the reactor 100 should be sufficient
to reduce
the pH of the resulting chlorine dioxide effluent solution to less than about
7. More
preferably, the pH is reduced to about 1 to about 5, with a reduction of pH to
about 2 to
about 3 most preferred. The alkali metal ions from the all~ali metal chlorite
solution
can diffuse through membrane 118 to the cathode compartment 106 and with the
hydroxyl ions produce an alkali metal hydroxide effluent from the cathode
compartment 106.
CA 02463378 2004-04-06
WO 03/106736 PCT/US02/33911
17
In electrolytic reactor 10, the alkali metal chlorite solution flows through
the
anode compartment 16. As a current is applied to the reactor 10, the anode
compartment 16 oxidizes the solution to generate, among others, hydrogen ions.
As
previously described, oxidation of the dissociated hydrogen ions into hydrogen
atoms
transpires so that the electrochemical oxidation of chlorite ions to chlorine
dioxide can
then occur.
The concentration of chlorine dioxide produced by the electrolytic reactor,
e.g.
10, 100, is preferably less than about 6.0 grams per liter (g/L), with less
than about 3
g/L more preferred and less than about 0.65 g/L even more preferred. Also
preferred is
a chlorine dioxide concentration greater than about 0.06 g/L, with greater
than about
0.3 g/L more preferred and greater than about 0.5 g/L even more preferred. At
concentrations greater than about 6.0 g/L, there is an increased risk of
producing
chlorine dioxide in the vapor phase, which undesirably can cause an explosion
referred
to by those skilled in the art as a "puff'.
There are a number of variables that may be optimized during operation of the
electrolytic reactor. For example, current density is preferably maintained at
about 5 to
about 100 milliAmps per square centimeter (mA/cm2). More preferably, the
current
density is less than about 50 mA /cm2, with less than about 35 mAJcm2 even
more
preferred. Also preferred, are current densities greater than about 10 mA/cmz,
with
greater than about 25 mA/cm2 more preferred. The temperature at which the
aqueous
medium is maintained during contact of the allcali metal chlorite solution
with the
catalyst can vary widely. Preferably, the temperature is less than about 50
°C, with less
than about 35 °C more preferred and with less than about 25 °C
even more preferred.
Also preferred is a temperature greater than about 2°C, with greater
than about 5 °C
more preferred, and with greater than about 10 °C even more preferred.
In a preferred
embodiment, the process is carried out at ambient temperature.
In addition to temperature and current density, the contact time of the
chlorine
dioxide precursor with the catalyst material is preferably less than about 20
minutes and
more preferably, less than about 2 minutes. Also preferred is a contact time
greater
than about lminute, with greater than about 0.1 minute more preferred. The
velocity of
the chlorine dioxide precursor solution through the catalyst bed is preferably
less than
about 100 centimeters/minute (cm/min), with less than about 70 cm/min more
preferred
and less than about 30 cm/min more preferred. Also preferred is a velocity
greater than
CA 02463378 2004-04-06
WO 03/106736 PCT/US02/33911
18
about 0.1 cmlmin, with greater than about 10 cmlmin more preferred and with
greater
than about 20 cm/min even more preferred. The pressure drop through the
catalyst bed
is preferably less than about 20 pounds per square inch (psi) and for most
applications,
with less than about 10 psi more preferred. Also preferred is a pressure drop
greater
than about 0.1 psi, and for most applications, with greater than about 1 psi
more
preferred. Further optimization for any of these process variables is well
within the
skill of those in the art in view of this disclosure.
While not wanting to be bound by theory, the use of the catalyst material in
the
electrochemical reactor system effectively lowers the activation energy for
the
oxidation of dissociated hydrogen ions into hydrogen atoms. Oxidation of the
dissociated hydrogen ions into hydrogen atoms transpires so that the
electrochemical
oxidation of chlorite ions to chlorine dioxide can occur. It is believed that
the
electrochemical production of chlorine dioxide from chlorite ions is believed
to proceed
in accordance with the following reaction scheme:
(I) SC102- + 4H~ ----~ 4C102 + Cl- +2H20
Based on this reaction scheme, the maximum yield efficiency of chlorine
dioxide will be an 80% conversion. Moreover, in addition to generating
chlorine
dioxide, the reaction advantageously produces as a byproduct, chloride ions.
Chloride
ions are not toxic or hazardous for most applications requiring the in situ
generation of
chlorine dioxide.
In electrolytic reactors employing a non-permselective membrane to separate
the anode compartment from the central compartment, the use of dilute chlorite
solutions as described herein and the hygroscopic nature of the non-
permselective
membrane minimizes diffusion of the chlorite ions from the central compartment
to the
electrode compartments. Moreover, it is believed that employing canon exchange
resins in the anode axid/or cathode compartments further minimizes diffusion
of chlorite
ions from the central compartment to the respective electrode compartment. As
a
result, conversion efficiency of chlorite ion to chlorine dioxide is close to
or about the
maximum conversion efficiency.
CA 02463378 2004-04-06
WO 03/106736 PCT/US02/33911
19
Example 1.
In this example, a ceramic catalyst material was prepared as follows. A metal
oxide precursor solution was prepared by admixing 0.85 grams
tetraamineplatinum (II)
chloride, 41 ml of 91% isopropyl alcohol, 0.83 ml of 30% ammonium hydroxide
and
26 ml of deionized water. The precursor solution was used twice to coat 100
milliliters
of MACROLITE ML-20/40 that had been backwashed and air dried for about 12
hours.
After each coating, the resin was baled at 550°C for 30 minutes.
Example 2.
In this example, a ceramic catalyst material was prepared as follows. A metal
oxide precursor solution was prepared by admixing 0.85 grams
tetraamineplatinum (II)
chloride, 41 ml of 91% isopropyl alcohol, 0.83 ml of 30% ammonium hydroxide
and
26 ml of deionized water. The precursor solution was used twice to coat 100
milliliters
of SIR-600 resin commercially available from ResinTech, Inc. that had been
baclwashed and air-dried for about 12 hours. After each coating, the resin was
baled
at 550°C for 30 minutes.
Example 3.
In this example, electrochemical reactor cassettes were configured as
described
in Figures 4 and 5. The electrode compartments contained SK116 cation exchange
resin commercially available from Mitsubishi Chemical. The central compartment
contained a particulate material bed of three equal layers. The first layer
consisted of
SK116 canon exchange resin; the second layer consisted of equal amounts by
weight of
the SK116 cation exchange resin and the catalyst material; and the third layer
consisted
of the catalyst material. The catalyst material was prepared in accordance
with
Examples 1. An overview of the cassette components is shown in Table I.
CA 02463378 2004-04-06
WO 03/106736 PCT/US02/33911
Table I.
Anode DSA, flat sheet
Cathode 316L stainless steel, flat sheet
Electrode Area 155 cm
Membrane Area 155 cm
Inter Membrane Spacing 1.27 cm
Catalyst Pt impreg~Zated (Example 1)
Cation Exchange Resin SKl 16 (Mitsubishi Chemical)
Canon Exchange Membrane CMI-7000 (Membranes International,
Inc.)
Four cassettes containing the ceramic catalyst material were installed in
parallel
in a HALOX 1000 chlorine dioxide generator. Performance for the electrolytic
reactor
system was monitored for 1000 hours, wherein each data point was tal~en at 100-
hour
5 intervals. A continuous stream of softened water having a conductivity of
120 ~,S/cm
was passed through each compartment at a rate of 150 mL/minute and a
temperature of
25°C. Sodium chlorite at a concentration of 25% (wt/wt) was injected
into the stream
flowing into the central compartment at a flow rate such that the
concentration of
sodium chlorite was approximately 1000 mg/L (the maximum chlorine dioxide
yield
10 based on the chlorite concentration is 746mg/L). The temperature of the
sodium
chlorite solution was maintained at about 25°C and was first passed
through the first
layer of the central compartment. A constant current of about 4.0 amps was
applied to
each cassette.
Figure 6 illustrates the pressure drop (pressure/flow rate) through the
central
15 compartment as a function of time. An increase in pressure drop is an
indication that
compaction of the bed within the central compartment is occurring. The use of
the
electrolytic reactor employing the catalyst material did not result in a
pressure increase
during continuous operation of the reactor for 1000 hours. Rather, the results
show that
the pressure drop was constant throughout the period of operation suggesting
that
20 compaction of the bed did not occur. A visual inspection of a disassembled
cassette
showed no evidence of compaction or channeling.
Figure 7 graphically depicts the conversion efficiency as a function of time.
A
Direct Reading Spectrophotometer, Model No. DR/2000, was used to measure the
chlorine dioxide concentration (mg/L) in the exiting solution using Hach
Company
CA 02463378 2004-04-06
WO 03/106736 PCT/US02/33911
21
Method 8138. Measurement of the yield provides a standard for evaluating
actual
performance of the cassette and can be determined in accordance with the
following
mathematical relationship:
°'oYield = actual ~ 100
tlaeo~etical
wherein the actual yield is determined from the amount of chlorine dioxide
generated,
aald wherein the theoretical yield is calculated by the amount of chlorine
dioxide that
could be generated from the sodium chlorite solution. As previously discussed,
since it
tapes five moles of chlorite ions to male 4 moles of chlorine dioxide, the
theoretical
yield can be calculated as follows:
~C10
%Theo~eticalYield = 2 Product ~ 100
5 )~NaClO~,jeed 67.5
wherein the term (90.5/67.5) is the ratio of the equivalent weight of the
sodium chlorite
to chlorine dioxide.
As shown in Figure 7, the conversion efficiency for the cassette employing the
ceramic material is constant at about greater than about 95% of the maximum
theoretical yield during the 1000 hours of continuous operation. Thus, the use
of the
catalyst material in the electrolytic reactor provides a yield that is at
about the
maximum possible yield. Increased conversion efficiencies over a prolonged
period of
time are a significant commercial advantage since it reduces the maintenance
and
operating costs of these reactors significantly.
Example 4.
In this example, two electrochemical reactor cassettes were configured as
described in Figures 4 and 5. Each cassette included electrode compartments
that
contained SK116 cation exchange resin, wherein each compartment was separated
from
an adjacent compartment by cation exchange membranes (permselective). The
central
compartment of the first cassette contained a particulate material bed of
three equal
CA 02463378 2004-04-06
WO 03/106736 PCT/US02/33911
22
layers. The first layer consisted of SKl 16 cation exchange resin; the second
layer
consisted of equal amounts by weight of the SK116 cation exchange resin and a
ceramic catalyst material; and the third layer consisted of the ceramic
catalyst material.
The ceramic catalyst material was prepared in accordance with Example 1. The
central
compartment of the second cassette contained a packed bed of Diaion SK1B
cation
exchange resin. Commercially available from Mitsubishi Chemical, Diaion SK1B
is a
cross-linked polystyrene cation exchange resin having a cross-linking density
of 8%.
Softened water was passed upwardly through the anode compartment at a flow
rate of about 150 mL/min. A 25-weight % of sodium chlorite solution was added
to the
effluent of the anode compartment such that the final concentration of sodium
chlorite
was about 1000 mg/L. The combined sodium chlorite/effluent solution was then
passed through the catalyst compartment. In the compartment including the
three
layers, the fluid passed from the bottommost layer to the topmost layer. In
addition,
softened water was passed upwardly through the cathode compartment at a flow
rate of
about 50 mL/min. While passing the solutions through the compartments of the
reactor, a controlled current of about 4.0 amps was applied to the anode and
cathode.
The results are summarized in Table II. All data recorded was taken after
operating the electrolytic reactor for about 3 hours. The measured parameters
for each
cassette included cassette voltage, current, pressure drop through the bed
flow rate
(mL/min), C102 concentration (ppm), temperature (°C) and pH.
Table II
Catalyst Material Cation Exchange Resin
C102 concentration,558 11
(ppm)
Flow Rate, (mL/min)150 158
Temperature, (C) 26.5 26.5
PH 2.76 2.45
Pressure Drop, (psi)8.0 13.0
Voltage, (volts) 23.0 19.2
Current, (Amps) 4.03 4.12
Clearly, the use of the ceramic catalyst material resulted in significantly
superior results compared to the use of cation exchange resin in the central
CA 02463378 2004-04-06
WO 03/106736 PCT/US02/33911
23
compartment. After only 3 hours of operation, conversion of chlorite ions to
chlorine
dioxide concentration was 50 times greater with the cassette employing the
catalyst bed
compared to the cassette employing the cation exchange resin bed. Moreover,
the
pressure drop across the bed increased siguficantly with the cassette
employing the
cation exchange resin indicating compaction of the bed.
Example 5.
In this example, electrochemical reactor cassettes were configured as
described
in Figures 4 and 5. The cathode compartment was separated from the central
compartment with a cation exchange membrane. The central compartment contained
a
particulate material bed of three equal layers. The first layer consisted of
SK116 cation
exchange resin; the second layer consisted of equal amounts by weight of the
SK116
cation exchange resin and a catalyst material; and the third layer consisted
of the
catalyst material. The catalyst material was prepared in accordance with
Example 2,
i.e., modified SIR-600 resin. The electrode compartments contained SK106
cation
exchange resin.
In one set of cassettes, the anode compartment was separated from the central
compartment using a FlourteX 9-70/22 non-permselective membrane commercially
available from Sefar America, Inc. The Fluortex° is a fluorocarbon
based membrane,
and in this example, had a pore size of 0.070 millimeters. In a second set of
cassettes,
the anode compartment was separated from the central compartment using a
cation
exchange membrane.
The electrochemical reactor cassettes were operated in the following manner.
Softened water having a conductivity of about 120 ~,S/cm was passed upwardly
through the anode compartment at a flow rate of about 150 mL/min. A 25-weight
sodium chlorite solution was added to the effluent of the anode compartment
such that
the final concentration of sodium chlorite was about 1000 mg/L. The combined
sodium
chlorite/effluent solution was then passed through the central compartment at
a
temperature of about 25°C. In addition, softened water was passed
upwardly through
the cathode compartment at a flow rate of about 50 mL/min. While passing the
solutions through the various compartments of the reactor, a controlled
current of about
4.0 amps was applied to the anode and cathode.
CA 02463378 2004-04-06
WO 03/106736 PCT/US02/33911
24
Figure 8 graphically illustrates the percent conversion of the chlorite ions
to
chlorine dioxide as a function of time for each set of cassettes. After an
initial break-in
period of about 200 hours of operation, the conversion efficiency for the
cassettes that
included the non-permselective membrane is greater than about 80-90% during
the
period of time monitored. Thus, the use of the non-permselective membrane
between
the anode compartment and the central compartment in the electrolytic reactor
provided
a yield that is at about the maximum possible yield. In contrast, the use of
cassettes
that included a cation exchange membrane (permselective) between the anode
compartment and the central compartment exhibited a gradual decrease in
conversion
efficiency from about 1000 hours to about 2000 hours. Visual examination of
the
cation exchange membrane after about 2000 hours of operation indicated that
oxidation
had occurred. The cation exchange membrane exhibited discoloration, cracking,
and
delamination. In contrast, examination of the non-permselective membrane
showed no
visual evidence of oxidation.
Comparing the conversion efficiencies obtained in Figure 8 with the conversion
efficiencies presented in Figure 7 illustrates the increased efficiency
resulting from the
use of the catalyst material prepared in accordance with Example 1 (ceramic
media) as
compared to the catalyst material in accordance with Example 2 (ion exchange
resin).
Figure 9 graphically illustrates the applied voltage to the cassette as a
function
of time. The voltage was adjusted during operation of the electrolytic reactor
to
maintain a controlled current of about 4.0 amps. In the set of cassettes
employing the
non-permselective membrane, voltage was relatively constant throughout the
2000
hours of operation. In contrast, the voltage was gradually increased in the
cassettes
employing the cation exchange membrane (permselective). Since heterogeneous
membranes such as the cation exchange membrane consist of colloidal ion
exchange
particles embedded in an inert binder, the gradual increase in voltage is
believed to be
caused by the oxidation of the ion exchange particles, which causes the
material to
swell within the rigid matrix, thereby decreasing the size of the interstices
within the
membrane and corresponding access to the ionic sites contained therein. This,
in turn,
is believed to create a greater resistance to migrating and diffusing ionic
species,
resulting in an increased voltage over the operating lifetime to maintain a
constant
current.
CA 02463378 2004-04-06
WO 03/106736 PCT/US02/33911
While the disclosure has been described with reference to an exemplary
embodiment, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various
changes may
be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without
departing
from the scope of the invention. In addition, many modifications may be made
to adapt
5 a particular situation or material to the teachings of the disclosure
without departing
from the essential scope thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the
disclosure not be
limited to the particular embodiment disclosed as the best mode contemplated
for
carrying out this disclosure, but that the disclosure will include all
embodiments falling
within the scope of the appended claims.
