Language selection

Search

Patent 2469234 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2469234
(54) English Title: REACTIVE OIL/COPPER PRESERVATIVE SYSTEMS FOR WOOD PRODUCTS
(54) French Title: SYSTEMES DE CONSERVATEURS REACTIFS A BASE D'HUILE ET DE CUIVRE POUR PRODUITS LIGNEUX
Status: Deemed expired
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • B27K 3/22 (2006.01)
  • B27K 3/50 (2006.01)
  • B27K 3/52 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • ROOS, KENNETH D. (United States of America)
  • ARCHER, KEVIN J. (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • ARCHER DANIELS MIDLAND COMPANY (United States of America)
  • VIANCE, LLC (United States of America)
(71) Applicants :
  • CHEMICAL SPECIALTIES, INC. (United States of America)
  • ARCHER DANIELS MIDLAND COMPANY (United States of America)
(74) Agent: DEETH WILLIAMS WALL LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2009-02-17
(86) PCT Filing Date: 2002-12-04
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 2003-06-12
Examination requested: 2004-06-03
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/US2002/038607
(87) International Publication Number: WO2003/047852
(85) National Entry: 2004-06-03

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
60/336,577 United States of America 2001-12-04
10/163,265 United States of America 2002-06-05
10/251,615 United States of America 2002-09-20

Abstracts

English Abstract




The specification describes preserved solid wood or wood composites including
a copper ammonium acetate complex wood preservative and a drying oil. The wood
preservative is present in the wood in an amount effective to improve the
resistance of the treated wood to at least one type of decomposition, such as
decay or insect attack. The drying oil is present in the wood in an effective
amount to accomplish at least one useful end, such as reducing the water
absorption or thickness swell of the treated wood or increasing its mechanical
strength, even in a wood composite made using less binding resin than usual.
Yet another aspect of the invention is a method of making the treated wood
from green wood in solid or flaked form. A copper ammonium acetate complex
wood preservative and optionally a drying oil are added to the green wood.


French Abstract

L'invention concerne des composites ligneux ou de bois massif traités, comprenant un agent de conservation pour bois à base de complexe cuivre acétate d'ammonium et une huile siccative. L'agent de conservation pour bois est contenu dans le bois dans une quantité efficace pour augmenter la résistance du bois traité, jusqu'à au moins un type de décomposition, tel que la pourriture ou les dégâts causés par les insectes. L'huile siccative est contenue dans le bois dans une quantité efficace pour atteindre au moins un objectif utile, tel que la réduction de l'absorption d'eau ou le gonflement en épaisseur du bois traité ou l'augmentation de sa résistance mécanique, même dans un composite ligneux obtenu avec moins de résine de liaison que d'ordinaire. Un autre aspect de l'invention concerne un procédé de préparation de bois traité à partir de bois vert sous forme solide ou en flocons. Un agent de conservation pour bois à base de complexe cuivre acétate d'ammonium et éventuellement une huile siccative sont ajoutés au bois vert.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.




26

CLAIMS


1. Treated wood comprising:

a. a predominant proportion of wood in the form of particles or plies
joined to form a composite wood product or plywood:

b. a copper based wood preservative, present in said wood particles or
plies in an amount effective to improve the resistance of the treated
wood to decay; and

c. a drying oil, present in said wood particles or plies in an amount
effective to reduce the water absorption of the treated wood.


2. The treated wood of claim 1, wherein said copper based wood preservative
comprises from about 0.5 wt.% to about 15 wt. % of a copper ammonium acetate
complex, on a dry wood basis.


3. The treated wood of claim 1, comprising from about 0.5 wt.% to about 50
wt.% of
said drying oil, on a dry wood basis.


4. The treated wood of claim 1, in the form of treated wood particles joined
to form a
composite wood product.


5. The treated wood of claim 1, in the form of treated wood plies joined to
form
plywood.


6. Treated composite panel products comprising:
a. a predominant proportion of wood in the form of particles or plies
joined to form a composite panel product;

b. a copper based wood preservative, present in said wood particles or
plies in an amount effective to improve the resistance of the
panel products to termites; and



27

c. a dying oil, present in said panel products in an amount
effective to reduce the water absorption of the panel products.

7. The treated composite panel products of claim 6, in the form of treated
wood
particles joined to form a composite wood product.


8. The treated composite panel products of claim 6, in the form of treated
wood plies
joined to form plywood.


9. A treated wood composite comprising:

a. a predominant proportion of wood particles;

b. a copper based wood preservative, present in said wood in an
amount effective to improve the resistance of the treated wood to
decay, end

c. a drying oil, present in said wood in an amount effective to reduce
the thickness swell of the treated wood.


10. The treated wood composite of claim 9, in the form of treated wood
particles joined
to form a composite wood product.


11. Treated wood comprising:
a. a predominant proportion of wood particles;

b. a copper based wood preservative, present in said wood in an
amount effective to improve the resistance of the treated wood to
decay; and

c. a drying oil, present in said wood in an amount effective to improve
the bond strength of the treated wood.


12. The treated wood of claim 11 , further comprising an amount of a resin
bonding
agent to improve the bond strength of the resulting product.


13. The treated wood of claim 11 ,in the form of treated wood particles joined
to form
a composite wood product.


14. A method of making treated wood particles comprising:



28

a. providing green wood particles;

b. adding to said green wood particles a copper based wood
preservative, present in said wood in an amount effective to improve
the resistance of the treated wood to decay; and

c. adding to said green wood particles a drying oil, present in said
green wood particles in an amount effective to reduce the water
absorption of the treated wood particles.


15. The method of claim 14 , further comprising the step of pressing the
drying oil
treated wood particles to form a composite wood product.


16. The method of claim 15, further comprising the step, preceding said
pressing
step, of adding a binding resin to said wood particles.


Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.



CA 02469234 2007-05-09

WO 03/0-17852 PCT/US02/38607
REACTIVE OIL/COPPER PRESERVATIVE SYSTEMS
FOR WOOD PRODUCTS
BACKGROUND
This invention relates to the incorporation of a drying oil and a copper
containing preservative system into wood products, which may include lumber
and
plywood, and into wood and agricultural based composite products. Wood based
composite products can include products such as oriented strandboard, medium
density fiberboard, fiberboard, hardboard, and particle board. The invention
also
relates to the method of manufacturing wood based composite products whereby a
drying oil and a wood preservative composition are added to the wood furnish
(defined as wood strands, chips, particles, flakes and fiber), plywood
(whether in the
form of separate plies or a bound sheet), or solid wood pi7ior to or after
drying. Where
a wood furnish or separate wood plies are treated, the wood is then formed and
pressed into a finished board or panel product.
The production of wood based composite panel products has increased
dramatically in recent years. Oriented strandboard (OSB) production exceeded
that of
plywood in the Year 2000. In order to continue this new growth, additional
uses for
OSB need to be developed. Common applications for these products include roof
sheathing, wall sheathing, flooiing, structural insulated panels and
engineered wood
components such as I-joists. With the ever-expanding production capacity of
wood
based composites there is a critical need to find additional uses.
The use of medium density fiberboard and hardboard panel products likewise
has increased dramatically over the last couple decades. However, these
products are
typically used in interior applications where attack from insects or decay
fungi is
limited and dimensional stability is not of great concern. The market for
these types of


CA 02469234 2007-05-09

WO 03/0478.52 PCT/US02/38607
2

materials is fairly well developed. To maintain marlcet share and increase
production
it will be necessary to develop new products that can withstand exterior
environments.
The expansion of wood fiber, particle and flake based composites into certain
construction applications is hindered by limitations in the physical and
mechanical
properties of the manufactured panels, in particular excessive water
absorption and
propensity to swell, but also by their susceptibility to attack by biological
agents such
as decay fungi and termites.
Chemical preservatives and water repellent treatments are available for solid
lumber and plywood. Such chemical treatments are applied to lumber, millwork,
wood plies, and so foith using vacuum pressure processes to ensure uniform
distribution of the active ingredients throughout the wood components. Treated
woods find application in the construction of residential housing and
commercial
buildings.
Historically, attempts to incorporate chemical treatments into wood based
composites using similar technology have failed for economic reasons or more
commonly because of technical problems associated with irreversible and
excessive
swelling of the treated panels and severe loss of structural integrity.
The development of an economically viable preservative/water repellent
treatment for solid wood, plywood, and wood based composites with minimal or
no
impact on board structural properties, would be desirable to the industry and
consumers.
The development of such products would have a significant impact upon the
forest resources of North America as well as the world. Solid wood or a formed
panel
product that has been treated to resist biological action and is inherently
stable to
resist water will significantly increase the service life of the final wood
product.
Hence replacement of damaged, decayed, or destroyed panels will be less
frequent.
Therefore, more solid wood and wood fiber can be channeled to new construction
and
not the replacement market. This will limit the stress on the forest resources
of North
America, which have been shrinking over the last two decades due to land being
tied
up in "natural" status, which cannot be harvested.

U.S. Patent No. 6,569,540 , entitled:
Dimensionally Stable Wood Composites And Methods For Making Them, discloses


CA 02469234 2007-05-09

WO 03/047852 PCT/US02/38607
3

treated wood composites and their ingredients and manufacture.

PCT patent application WO 92/19429, published November 12, 1992, in
Example 2, describes a method of treating an article of prepared wood by
inunersing
it for 20 minutes in a bath of 180 C linseed oil containing a drier
(siccative) of 0.07%
lead, 0.003% manganese and 0.004% calcium and 0.3% copper naphthenates and
0.03
zinc naphthenates as an insecticide and fungicide.
U.S. Patent Nos. 5,607,633, 5,719,301, and 6,277,310 describe bonding
composite panels such as oriented strand board, particle board, plywood, MDF,
hardboard, and similar panels, using a material such as linseed oil, which may
be
nlodified to provide bonding characteristics.
Fojutowslci, A.; Lewandowski, 0, Zesz. Probl. Postepow Nazsk Rolri. No. 209:
197-204 (1978), describes fungicides comprising fatty acids with copper
compounds,
applied by dipping hardboard heated to 120 C into a bath of the fungicide,
also
maintained at 120 C.
Japanese Patent Application 08-183,010 JP, published in 1996, describes a
modified wood claimed to have mildew-proofing and antiseptic properties and
ant-
proofing properties, made by treating wood with a processing liquid containing
a
composite multivalent metal (one example of which is copper) salt and linseed
oil or
another liquid hardening composition. The abstract states that the composite
multivalent metal salt is strongly fixed within the material so as to let the
composite
multivalent metal salt give antibacterial properties, antiseptic properties,
ant-proofing
properties, water repellency and strength to wood.
U.S Patent No. 3837875 describes as a composition for cleaning, sealing,
preserving, protecting and beautifying host materials such as wood a mixture
of
boiled linseed oil, turpentine, pine oil, a dryer and atomized metallic copper
with the
copper being present in a ratio of about 28 parts per million.
Feist, William C.; Mraz, Edward A., Forest Products Lab Madison WI, Wood
Finishing: Water Repellents and Water-Repelleiat Preservatives. Revisioiz,
Report
Number- FSRN-FPL-0124-Rev (NTIS 1978) discloses preservatives containing a
substance that repels water (usually paraffin wax or related material), a
resin or drying
oil, and a solvent such as turpentine or mineral spirits. Addition of a
preservative such


CA 02469234 2004-06-03
WO 03/047852 PCT/US02/38607
4

as copper naphthenate to the water repellent is asserted to protect wood
surfaces
against decay and mildew organisms.
Soviet Union Patent No. SU 642166 describes a wood surface staining and
preservation treatment, carried out by impregnating wood with an aqueous
copper salt
solution, followed by thermal treatment in boiling drying oil containing 8-
hydroxyquinoline dye. The copper salt and the dye form a complex which is
stated to
stain and preserve the wood.
Schultze-Dewitz, G., Itnprovemeyat of Beech Wood, HoLzFoRscxUNG UNID
HOLZVERWERTUNG Vol. 46, No. 2, 1994 pp. 34-39, states that specimens of beech
wood in air-dried, green, and water-stored conditions (about 15, 120 and 150-
180%
moisture content, respectively) were impregnated with nine different
chemicals/mixtures, and effects on the dimensional stability and physical and
mechanical properties of the wood. One of the impregnants was linseed oil
varnish.
All the impregnants were said to dimensional stability, and also were
disclosed to
improve certain properties of the wood.
Pizzi, A., A New Approach To Non-Toxic, Wide-Spectruna, Ground-Contact
Wood Preservatives. Part I. Approach And Reaction 1Vlechanisms, HOLZFORSCHUNG
Vol. 47, No. 3, 1993, pp. 253-260, asserts that copper soaps, made with the
carboxylic
acid groups from unsaturated fatty acids of edible vegetable oils which are
non-toxic
(such as corn oil or sunflower oil), from resin acids of rosin which are non-
toxic, and
also from synthetic unsaturated polyester resins were shown in 25-year tests
to have
effectiveness and long-term durability as ground contact wood preservatives
for use
against termites and fungal attack.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
One aspect of the present invention is treated wood comprising a copper based
wood preservative, for example a copper ammonium acetate complex, and a drying
oil. The drying oil can be, for example, a drying agricultural oil or fish
oil.
The wood preservative is present in the wood in an amount effective to
improve the resistance of the treated wood to at least one type of
decomposition.
Alternative types of decomposition contemplated here are decay, termite or
other
insect damage.


CA 02469234 2004-06-03
WO 03/047852 PCT/US02/38607

The drying oil is present in the wood in an effective amount to accomplish at
least one useful end. One useful end is to reduce the water absorption of the
treated
wood. An alternative useful end is to reduce the thiclcness swell of the
treated wood.
Another aspect of the invention is a treated wood composite comprising: a
predominant proportion of wood particles; a copper based wood preservative;
and a
drying oil.
The wood preservative again is present in the wood composite in an amount
effective to improve the resistance of the treated wood composite to at least
one type
of decomposition.
The presence of a copper based wood preservative with a reactive agricultural
oil or fish oil has the potential to provide biological efficacy against wood
biodeteriogens. (A biodeteriogen is an organism that is capable of causing
biodeterioration -- an undesirable change in the properties of a material
caused by the
vital activities of living organisms.) Biodeteriogens for wood include decay
fungi,
termites and other insects. Complexation of the preservative with the reactive
oil
reduces the likelihood of leaching/depletion of the preservative in service.
The drying oil again is present in the wood in an effective amount to
accomplish at least one useful end. For example, the drying oil may interact
to
enhance the dimensional stability or water repellency of the wood composite,
and
may function to reduce or eliminate the need for a separate binder resin.
Yet another aspect of the invention is a method of making treated wood
composites. One step of the method is providing green wood in flaked form.
Another
step of the method is adding to the green wood a copper based wood
preservative.
The wood preservative again is added to the wood composite in an amount
effective
to improve the resistance of the treated wood composite to at least one type
of
decomposition. Another step of the method, alternatively carried out
simultaneously
with, before, or after the wood preservative treatment, is adding to the green
wood a
drying oil. The drying oil again is present in the wood composite in an
effective
amount to accomplish at least one useful end.
One advantage of the present method is that it allows the wood to be treated
with the preservative while green, then dried once, instead of drying the
wood,


CA 02469234 2004-06-03
WO 03/047852 PCT/US02/38607
6

treating it with a water dispersion of the treating agent (thus rewetting the
wood), then
drying the wood a second time.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION
The present inventors have jointly developed a system for incorporating a
copper based preservative system, for example the treatment commercially
available
as the COMPTECTm copper ammonium acetate complex wood treatment, in
combination with drying oils functioning as described herein, into the
manufacturing
process for solid wood, plywood, and wood based composites.
Pertinent copper based preservatives include, for example:

= alkaline (amine or ammonia) copper quats (ACQ)
= ammonium/copper complex

= ammoniacal copper zinc arsenate (ACZA)
= bis(N-cyclohexyldiazeniumdioxy)copper
= copper acetate

= copper ammonium acetate complex
= copper azole

= copper borate

= copper carbonate
= copper citrate,

= copper fluoride

= copper fluoroborate
= copper hydroxide

= copper hydroxycarbonate
= copper naphthenate

= copper oxide

= copper oxychloride

= copper salt of 8-Hydroxyquinoline
= copper sulfate

= diethanolamine/copper complex
= diethylamine/copper complex


CA 02469234 2004-06-03
WO 03/047852 PCT/US02/38607
7

= ethanolamine/copper complex

= ethylene diamine/copper complex
= triethanolamine/copper complex

and combinations thereof. Many copper-based wood preservatives are lcnown, and
their use is contemplated here.
Pertinent agricultural drying oils include linseed, soybean, canola, rapeseed,
sunflower, tung and castor oils and any other oils derived from agricultural
sources.
Pertinent fish oils, which are also drying oils, can be extracted from
sardines,
maclcerel, codfish (including but not limited to cod-liver oil), tuna, salmon,
pilchard,
menhaden, and herring, as well as other species.
For composite panel products, the oil copper combination can be applied to a
wet (green) or dry wood or wood furnish but is most optimally applied to green
or wet
wood furnish at a moisture content (MC) above the fiber saturation point (i.e.
above
30% MC). The use of a green wood furnish ensures that the penetration of the
preservative system into wood flakes is maximized for optimum efficacy.
In the case of solid lumber, piles, and already manufactured plywood, the
copper combination is preferably applied to dry wood at a moisture content
around
15-19%. The use of dry wood ensures penetration deep into the wood to maximize
penetration.
The addition rate for the copper ammonium acetate complex wood treatment
formulation may range from 0.5% m/m (i.e. "mass-to-mass" or weight %) active
ingredient to 5 % m/m active ingredient defined on a copper ammonium acetate
complex basis.
The drying oil addition rate may vary from 0.5% to 50% by weight (m/m).
The lower limit of drying oil addition can alternatively be 1%, 1.25%, 2%,
2.5%, 3%,
4%, or 5% by wood weight, on the same basis. The upper limit of drying oil
addition
can alternatively be 50%, 40%, 30%, 25%, 20%, 15%, 14%, or 13%, or 12%, or
11%,
or 10%, or 8%, or 6%, or 5% by wood weight, on the same basis. The decay and
termite resistance performance of the finished panels are proportionally
linked to the
weight percentage of copper ammonium acetate complex wood treatment
incorporated into the furnish. Similarly, improvements in water absorption and


CA 02469234 2004-06-03
WO 03/047852 PCT/US02/38607
8

thickness swell is proportionally related to the level of oil incorporated
into the
matrix.

The COMPTECTM wood composite treatment and the oil are believed to be
synergistic when used to treat solid wood, wood composites, or plywood. Their
use
in wood based composites can provide mechanical panel properties that are
superior
to those expected with conventional resin systems alone. The increase in
mechanical
properties correlates with the quantity of oil and copper ammonium acetate
complex
wood treatment added to the furnish or plies. Given a consistent resin
loading, as the
level of oil increases per given level of copper ammonium acetate complex wood
treatment, the mechanical properties improve significantly. The interaction of
the
copper based wood treatment and oil is believed to create a secondary resin
source
which enhances the overall furnish to furnish (particle/flake: particle/flake)
bonding in
wood composites. This improves the overall mechanical properties of the
finished
panel.

This interaction is thought to act similarly to a chemical process known as
epoxidation in which oils derived from agricultural products can be converted
from
liquids into either soft or hard plastic compounds. Examples of this would be
bags
used for blood collection and PVC plastic stabilizer for plastic piping used
for
plumbing. Chemically, epoxidation involves the addition of an oxygen bridge to
unsaturated oil molecules via a catalytic reaction pathway. In this invention,
copper
ions are provided by the copper ammonium acetate complex wood treatment.
Therefore, it is hypothesized that, in the manufacture of wood based
composites and plywood, especially during pressing, the active ingredients of
the
copper ammonium acetate complex wood treatment epoxidize the oil, creating a
secondary binding agent for the wood. Using both a copper ammonium acetate
complex and a drying oil, it is possible to make composite wood products using
no
other synthetic binding resins that are currently used by industry. These
resins include
phenol formaldehyde, isocyanates, and urea formaldehyde resins.
The treatment of solid wood with an oil and another copper based wood
preservative is also contemplated. Copper ammonium acetate complex
(COMPTECTM) and alkaline copper complex wood treatment solutions are two of
many copper based formulations that are suitable for this purpose.


CA 02469234 2004-06-03
WO 03/047852 PCT/US02/38607
9

The treatment solutions can be emulsified using water as a carrier, the oil
can
be utilized as the carrier of the biocide treatment, or the oil and biocide
can be applied
separately, as by first treating the wood with the copper complex, then
treating it with
the reactive oil, which can be applied, for example, in the form of an aqueous
emulsion.
The reactive oil can alternatively be formulated as part of a water repellent
emulsion system that is subsequently applied to the wood, which can also
include a
binding resin. The copper complex, reactive oil, water repellant, and binding
resin, or
any subset of them can also be provided as one formulation. The inventors
contemplate that if the wax emulsion and the copper complex are present in the
same
foimulation and would otherwise tend to react prematurely, the wax emulsion
will
partially shield the oil from the copper in this single step emulsion. The
copper and oil
then will interact when the wax emulsion breaks within the wood.
The wood may be treated by pressure treatment, much like other wood
treatments are applied to solid wood. One pressure treatment may be used, or a
series
of two or more pressure treatments may be used. More than one pressure
treatment
may be applied if the copper complex and reactive oil are added from separate
formulations. '
The copper complex and reactive oil treatments can be carried out at ambient
temperature, for example 21 C, at a lower temperature, or at an elevated
temperature.
For example, although the treatment temperature is not contemplated to be
critical, a
suitable temperature range is 0 C -179 C, alternatively 0 C-119 C,
alternatively 0 C-
100 C, alternatively 0 C-80 C, alternatively 0 C-60 C, alternatively 0 C-50 C,
alternatively 0 C-40 C, alternatively a lower limit of any of the preceding
ranges of
15 C.
The epoxidization process is contemplated to improve the mechanical
properties of solid wood, as well as preserving it. It is hypothesized that
the
epoxidation process between the copper ions and reactive oil occurs, or is at
least
initiated, when the oil/copper treated solid wood is dried using conventional
drying
equipment to a moisture content appropriate for its eventual end use.
An oil/copper treated wood furnish can also be dried using conventional
drying equipment to a moisture content appropriate to the type of resin system
that is


CA 02469234 2004-06-03
WO 03/047852 PCT/US02/38607
utilized for the specific composite product being manufactured. On the other
hand,
copper treated wood flakes can be first dried and then sprayed with the oil at
the same
time as resin and wax are applied in a conventional blender prior to forming
and
pressing. The moisture content of the furnish treated in this manner can range
from
0.5% to 25% MC based on oven-dry weight of furnish. The dried furnish
optionally
may be blended with any of a vast variety of resins currently used by the
composite
wood industry. Such resins could include, but are not limited to liquid phenol
formaldehyde (LPF), powder phenol formaldehyde (PPF), acid catalyzed PF resins
(commonly known as Novolac resins), isocyanate (MDI), phenol-melamine-
formaldehyde adhesives (PMF), urea formaldehyde, or combinations of those
resins.
Addition rates may vary from 0% to 25% resin solids depending on panel type
and
application.
The dry treated wood furnish is sprayed with resin and wax (and in some cases
the drying oil), formed and oriented into a mat of the desired thickness and
pressed to
form the final panel. Mats are formed to suit the type of composite and
desired end
use. Formed mats are pressed under heat and pressure conditions appropriate to
the
final end use of the finished board. Typical press parameters include
consolidation
pressures ranging from 50 psi (35 N/cm) to 650 psi (453 N/cm2), cook pressures
from 0 psi (0 N/cm2) to 400 psi (280 N/cm), and a de-gas segment. Typical
press
temperatures vary from 200 F (93 C) to 550 F (288 C), depending on type of
composite. Press time may vary from 1 minute to 20 minutes duration.
Resin is applied to the treated plies, which are then formed with specific
cross
orientation of the veneers, or in the case of laminated veneer lumber all
oriented in
one direction. The formed billet is transferred into a press and consolidated
into the
final plywood or structural lumber substitute. Typical parameters include
consolidation pressures ranging between 50 and 300 psi (between 35 and 198
N/cm2).
Typical press temperatures may vary from 200 F (93 C) to 550 F (288 C). In
some
cases radio frequency curing may be utilized.
The physical and structural characteristics of the oil/ copper ammonium
acetate complex wood treatment treated composite or plywood panels are
equivalent
or superior in magnitude to similarly manufactured but untreated or copper
ammonium acetate treated composites and plywood that are not treated with an
oil.


CA 02469234 2004-06-03
WO 03/047852 PCT/US02/38607
11

Examples illustrating application of the invention using oriented strandboard
and medium density fiberboard as the matrix are presented below.

EXAMPLE 1 - OSB:

Five sets of three wood composite panels measuring 21 inches x 21 inches x 1/2
inch ( 53 cm x 53 cm x 1.2 cm) were manufactured on a laboratory press. One
set of
panels contained no oil or preservative and served as reference control
panels.
Another set of panels used copper ammonium acetate (copper ammonium acetate
complex wood preservative) treated flakes without linseed oil and was designed
to
serve as a reference control. The remaining panels used copper ammonium
acetate
treated flakes with varying loadings of linseed oil, Archer Daniels Midland's
GP-
1125. These levels were 1.25%, 2.5%, and 5.0% m/m based on oven dry wood
weight.
Green flakes (50% mc - "moisture content") were treated with copper
ammonium acetate alone or in combination with the various levels of oil in a
rotary
batch type blender equipped with a Coil Spinning disc atomizer. The flakes
were
treated with concentrated copper ammonium acetate solution (31.32% nominal
active
ingredient level) such that the final chemical loading on the flakes was
equivalent to
3.1% m/m on an oven dry weight of flakes basis. The treated flakes received a
short
dwell time (30-60 seconds) before drying. The target moisture content after
drying
was 5%.
One set of flakes was sprayed with liquid phenolic resin at an addition rate
of
3.5% solids on an oven dry weight of flakes basis, and a second batch was
blended
with powdered phenolic resin at an addition rate of 2.5% solids based on oven
dry
weight of flakes. A wax emulsion at a 1.0% solids addition rate was added to
all
combinations.
All the panels were pressed using mill pressing parameters appropriate for
each resin type. The press temperature was 380 F (193 C). The initial pressure
was
550 psi (383 N/cm). The press cycle times varied from 4.0 to 5.5 minutes plus
a 30
second de-gas period. The target density for the control panels was 40 pcf
(pounds
per cubic foot, 0.64 g/cm), and was increased to 42 pcf (0.67 g/cm) for the
copper


CA 02469234 2004-06-03
WO 03/047852 PCT/US02/38607
12
ammonium acetate treated panels. The density was increased in the treated
panels to
maintain an equal wood weight in the finished panels.
After pressing the panels were hot stacked for 24 hours prior to mechanical
and physical panel property testing. The panels were tested for Internal
Bonding (IB),
dry and wet strength (Modulus of Rupture, MOR), stiffness (modulus of
elasticity,
MOE), water absorption (WA), thickness swell (TS), and wet bending.
The results, Tables 1A and 1B, indicate a strong dose response between
increasing the oil level and the use of copper ammonium acetate complex wood
treatment at a 3.1% m/m loading. Superior water absorption, thickness swell,
enhanced internal bond, and improved wet bending strength were observed.

Table 1A: Liquid PF resin:

Treatment IB, MOE, MOR, WA % TS Wet MOR
psi psi psi % psi
Control (no copper
ammonium acetate complex
wood treatment, no oil) 56.8 663,797 3800 29.6 11.5 1945
1.25% oil 63.6 762,220 4642 26.8 8.6 1807
2.50% oil 97.2 753,322 4489 25.3 6.7 1987
5.00% oil 113.5 660,223 3877 17.8 4.2 2504
Treatment IB MOE MOR WA % TS Wet MOR
(kPa) (MPa) (MPa) % (MPa)
Control (no copper
ammonium acetate complex
wood treatment, no oil) 391.6 4576.7 26.2 29.6 11.5 13.4
1.25% oil 438.5 5255.3 32.0 26.8 8.6 12.5
2.50% oil 670.1 5194.0 30.9 25.3 6.7 13.7
5.00% oil 782.5 4552.1 26.7 17.8 4.2 17.3


CA 02469234 2004-06-03
WO 03/047852 PCT/US02/38607
13
Table 1B: Powder PF resin:

Treatment IB MOE MOR WA % TS % Wet MOR
(psi) (psi) (psi) (psi)
Control (no copper 48.7 572,082 3698 25.9 11.8 1718
ammonium acetate complex,
no oil)
Control with copper 52.8 680,108 3708 31.0 10.6 1882
ammonium acetate complex
no oil
1.25% oil 62.2 683,950 3784 16.3 5.5 1701
2.50% oil 81.1 855,498 4450 16.3 4.2 1765
5.00% oil 116.4 758,729 4655 15.6 3.7 2354
Treatment IB MOE MOR WA % TS % Wet MOR
(kPa) (MPa) (MPa) (MPa)
Control (no copper
ammonium acetate complex, 335.7 3944.4 25.5 25.9 11.8 11.8
no oil)
Control with copper
ammonium acetate complex 364.0 4689.2 25.6 31.0 10.6 13.0
no oil
1.25% oil 428.9 4715.7 26.1 16.3 5.5 11.7
2.50% oil 559.2 5898.5 30.7 16.3 4.2 12.2
5.00% oil 802.5 5231.3 32.1 15.6 3.7 16.2

To evaluate the decay and termite resistance of the treated panels samples cut
from the lab boards were exposed at two field test sites located in Hilo, HI.
One
siteprovides optimum conditions for wood decay fungi year round, the other
provides
a severe Formosan termite hazard.
For the decay testing, a procedure known as the ground proximity test was
used. Samples 50 x 125 mm x board thickness were placed into test lying flat
on top
of 100mm thick concrete blocks in direct contact with the ground. The test
samples
and concrete blocks were covered with a suspended horticultural shade cloth to
allow
rain ingress while retarding moisture loss. The amount of decay was measured
using
a subjective visual rating system after 12 months exposure. A decay rating of
'0'
indicates complete destruction of the sample whereas a rating of 100 equates
to 100%
sound. Data are summarized for Liquid PF and Powdered PF resin systems in
Tables


CA 02469234 2004-06-03
WO 03/047852 PCT/US02/38607
14
2A and 2B. It is apparent that the copper only and copper + oil treatments
provide
significant resistance to decay relative to conventional untreated OSB
samples.
For the termite testing a modified version of the set up used for the ground
proximity decay test was used. Test samples (50 x 125 mm x board thiclcness)
were
placed flat side down on the top of open concrete blocks which were in direct
contact
with the ground. Untreated feeder strips were placed between the test samples
and
into the ground through openings in the concrete blocks to attract termites
and to
direct them to the test samples. The whole assembly was covered with exterior
plywood supported on a treated 1" x 6" frame box. Inspections were carried out
periodically to monitor the performance of the preservatives in the test. A
subjective
numerical rating system was used to determine the percent volume of sample
consumed by termite feeding activities. A termite rating of '0' indicates
complete
destruction of the sample whereas a rating of 100 equates to 100% sound.
Results are
summarized in Tables 2C and 2D. The results show that the copper only and
copper +
oil treatments provide significant protection from Formosan termite feeding.
Untreated OSB samples and samples containing oil only were highly susceptible
to
termite attack.

Table 2A - Decay test results
Field Exposure Above Ground (Ground Proximity)
Hilo, HI - 12 months exposure

Liquid PF resin

Average Decay
Treatment rating
(Percent soundness)
Control (no copper ammonium acetate 0
complex, no oil)
Control with copper ammonium acetate 78
complex (Comptec), no oil
1.25% oil + Comptec 84
2.50% oil + Comptec 88
5.00% oil + Comptec 95
1.25% oil only 0
2.5 % oil only 0
5.0 % oil only 0


CA 02469234 2004-06-03
WO 03/047852 PCT/US02/38607

Decay test results
Field Exposure Above Ground (Ground Proximity)
Hilo, HI - 12 months exposure

Powdered PF resin

Average Decay
Treatment rating
(Percent Soundness)
Control (no copper anunonium acetate 0
complex, no oil)
Control with copper ammonium acetate 78
complex (Comptec), no oil
1.25% oil + Comptec 89
2.50% oil + Com tec 89
5.00% oil + Comptec 94
1.25% oil only 0
2.5 % oil only 0
5.0 % oil only 16
Table 2C -Termite test results
Field Exposure Above Ground (Ground Proximity)
Hilo, HI

Powdered PF resin

Average termite rating
Treatment Exposure time (months)
5 12
Control (no copper 0 0
ammonium acetate
complex, no oil)
Control with copper 96.3 91
ammonium acetate
complex (Comptec),
no oil
1.25% oil + Comptec 96.7 90
2.50% oil + Comptec 96 92.8
5.00% oil + Comptec 100 95.8
1.25% oil only 0 0
2.5 % oil only 0 0
5.0% oil only 40 0


CA 02469234 2004-06-03
WO 03/047852 PCT/US02/38607
16
Table 2D -Termite test results
Field Exposure Above Ground (Ground Proximity)
Hilo, HI

Liquid PF resin

Average termite
rating
Treatment Exposure time
(months)
12
Control (no copper 0 0
ammonium acetate
complex, no oil)
Control with copper 96.3 91
ammonium acetate
complex (Comptec),
no oil
1.25% oil + Comptec 100 94.8
2.50% oil + Comptec 100 93.8
5.00% oil + Comptec 98.8 76.6
1.25% oil only 0 0
2.5 % oil only 0 0
5.0% oil only 8 0
Example 2 - MDF:
The objective of this study was to determine if the synergistic effects
observed
with OSB would carry over into other composite applications.
Several sets of medium density fiberboard (MDF) panels were manufactured
using a lab press and a mixture of northern hardwood fiber. These panels
measured 21
inches by 21 inches by 3/8 inch thick (53 cm x 53 cm x 1 cm).
Fiber as received was rehydrated to approximately 50% MC (moisture
content) oven-dry basis to simulate the raw material supply used in
conventional
MDF manufacturing operations. Then the fiber was treated with 3.1% m/m of an
active copper ammonium acetate complex wood preservative and 5% m/m of Archer
Daniels Midland GP-1125 linseed oil. The treated fiber was dried to between 1-
2%
MC, oven-dry basis. The resulting dried treated fiber was blended with various
levels
of liquid phenolic resin and 0.5% solids of a wax emulsion. Phenolic resin was
applied to the treated fiber at 2, 4, 6 and 8% solids levels.


CA 02469234 2004-06-03
WO 03/047852 PCT/US02/38607
17
A control group of untreated fiber blended with 8% solids resin and 0.5%
solids wax emulsion was manufactured to serve as a reference control. This
level of
phenolic resin and wax emulsion is typical for the industry.
Wood composite mats were foimed in a declde box measuring 21 x 21 inches
(53 x 53 cm). Formed mats were pre-pressed to remove excess air and
consolidate the
mat to minimize squeeze out of fiber when pressing. This is a common practice
in the
industry. The mats were pressed at 380 F (193 C) for a total of 5.5 minutes -
five
minutes under pressure and a 30 second de-gas. The initial pressure was 550
psi (383
N/cm2) on the mat, decreasing to a cook pressure of 200 psi (139 N/cm2), and a
reduction to 0 psi (0 N/cm) during the de-gas phase. The target thickness was
3/8
inch (1 cm) with a target density of 62 pcf (1 g/cm3).
The pressed panels were allowed to hot stack 24 hours prior to mechanical and
physical panel property testing. The panels were evaluated for internal bond,
water
absorption, thickness swell, strength, and stiffness.
With OSB, having observed the influence on mechanical properties of the
oil/copper ammonium acetate complex mixture, it was determined to gradually
decrease the level of phenolic resin used. This was done to gauge the impact
of the
resin level upon the mechanical and physical properties of OSB. Knowing the
industry norm is as listed above, one would expect the properties of the
resulting
panels to fall off as the resin level was decreased. However, that was not the
case.
Given the fact that it is standard practice within the 1VIDF manufacturing
industry to use PF resin loadings of 8%, the results provided as Table 3 are
remarkable. It is apparent that that the oil / copper ammonium acetate complex
combination can replace most, if not all, the phenolic resin in the finished
panels.
Panels containing a copper ammonium acetate complex and oil but no
conventional
resin possessed similar or superior properties over the controls. The presence
of an
oil and a copper ammonium acetate complex appears to produce panels with
superior
properties at any given resin level. The dimensional stability and water
absorption
characteristics of the 1VIDF panels were significantly improved when the oil /
copper
ammonium acetate complex treatment was utilized regardless of resin level.


CA 02469234 2004-06-03
WO 03/047852 PCT/US02/38607
18
Table 3: 1VIDF

Group/ Resin Internal M3155 Stiffness Water Thickness
Solids Level (%) Bond (psi) (psi) Absorption (%) Swell (%)
Control, 8% resin 64.0 460,779 61.9 39.9
Treated, 2% resin 78.2 480,556 23.2 15.5
Treated, 4% resin 94.4 4543 565,638 25.4 14.1
Treated, 6% resin 87.7 4796 567,570 23.5 11.3
Treated, 8% resin 96.0 4679 556,543 27.3 10.5

Group/ Resin Internal Strength Stiffness Water Thickness
Solids Level (%) Bond (MPa) (MPa) Absorption (%) Swell (%)
(kPa)
Control, 8% resin 441.2 29.82 3176.9 61.9 39.9
Treated, 2% resin 539.2 24.40 3313.3 23.2 15.5
Treated, 4% resin 650.9 31.32 3899.9 25.4 14.1
Treated, 6% resin 661.9 33.07 3913.3 23.5 11.3
Treated, 8% resin 66.9 32.26 3837.2 27.3 10.5
Example 3:
OSB - Oil addition in the blender
While excellent results were observed adding linseed oil and copper
ammonium acetate complex wood treatment to the green furnish prior to drying,
it
was hypothesized that similar results could occur if the oil was added to the
blender at
the same time as the resin and wax. The copper ammonium acetate complex wood
treatment is desirably added to the green strands prior to drying since the
increase in
moisture content associated with the water borne preservative might not be
conducive
to a blender application.
In the manufacture of OSB, wax emulsions are typically incorporated into the
furnish at an addition rate of 1.0% solids. With such a low rate of addition,
optimizing coverage and distribution on the entire volume of furnish can be a
challenge. One of the potential benefits of adding the linseed oil at the same
time as
either the wax or liquid resin is that the combined volumes of these
components


CA 02469234 2004-06-03
WO 03/047852 PCT/US02/38607
19
would be increased. This would result in better coverage and distribution of
the
materials. As a consequence there is the potential to improve the panel
properties by
improving distribution alone. To evaluate the lilcelihood of this occurring,
Archer
Daniel Midland GP-1125 linseed oil was added to a commercial wax emulsion,
Borden's EW 58-S.
The wax and linseed oil were mixed in a ratio of 50:50 based, on solids of
each
material. This mixture was thoroughly mixed prior to application through a
coil
spinning disc atomizer to the strands being tumbled in a laboratory batch
blender.
The strands used for the study were primarily aspen with a percentage of white
birch and red pine mixed in. The strands were hydrated to approximately 50%
moisture content, then treated with 3.1% m/m of an active copper ammonium
acetate
complex wood treatment, and dried to approximately 4% moisture content.
The treated strands were blended with 2.5% of powdered phenolic resin and
various loadings of the blended oil and wax. A total of four groups of panels
were
produced for this study. A control group with the treated strands and a
loading of
1.0% solids wax emulsion was manufactured for a reference. The three
experimental
combinations were 1.0% solids of the wax/oil mixture, 2.0% solids wax oil
mixture,
and 4.0% solids of the wax oil mixture.
The blended furnish was formed into 21-inch by 21-inch inch (53 cm x 53 cm)
mats. The target thickness was 1/2 inch (1.2 cm) with a target density of 42
pcf (0.67
g/cm). The panels were pressed at 400 F (204 C) with a total press time of 5.5
minutes. The panels were allowed to hot stack overnight prior to cutting into
test
specimens.
Since the wax and oil levels were elevated and the oil was not partially cured
as in the previous examples, the internal bond testing was paramount to assess
what if
any effect the conditions used would have on bonding. Wet bending assessments
were
carried out to gauge the impact the perceived increase in water resistance
would have
on maintaining strength after exposure. Water absorption and thickness swell
were
measured to determine potential improvements.
The internal bond results testing indicates that we did not see as large an
increase in strength as we observed in previous work where the oil was added
to the
green flakes. However, the oil loading was only 2.0% versus the 5.0% in the
examples


CA 02469234 2004-06-03
WO 03/047852 PCT/US02/38607
1 and 2. Regardless, there was a dose response in internal bond strength: as
the oil
content increased from 0.5% to the maximum of 2.0% the internal bond value
improved and was approximately double than that of the controls.
Similar results in improved wet bending properties were observed. The 2.0%
and 4.0% overall dosage had significantly higher wet bending strength than the
controls or 1.0% group.
As the percentage of oil and wax increased, the thickness swell and water
absorption values decreased. At the 4.0% combination the thickness swell was
reduced to 5.2% based upon the original thickness of the panel.

Table 4. OSB - Oil added to the dry flakes in the blender.
Combination/
Oil-Wax Internal Bond Wet Strength Water Thickness
Loading (psi) (psi) Absorption (%) Swell (%)
Controls, 1.0% 25.3 2041 24.4 6.8
wax emulsion
1.0% Wax/Oil 25.1 2083 23.4 6.8
2.0% Wax/Oil 34.8 2367 20.8 6.1
4.0% Wax/Oil 45.2 2331 19.6 5.2
Combination/
Oil-Wax Internal Bond Wet Strength Water Thickness
Loading (kPa) (MPa) Absorption (%) Swell (%)
Controls, 1.0% 174.4 14.1 24.4 6.8
wax emulsion
1.0% Wax/Oil 173.1 14.4 23.4 6.8
2.0% Wax/Oil 239.9 16.3 20.8 6.1
4.0% Wax/Oil 311.6 16.1 19.6 5.2

EXAMPLE 4: OSB panel manufacture without conventional resin systems
The previous examples demonstrate that there is a strong synergy between
reactive agricultural based oils and copper ammonium acetate complex wood
treatment. When both components are used together to treat green or dry
furnish there
tends to be an improvement in strength of the bonds formed between individual


CA 02469234 2004-06-03
WO 03/047852 PCT/US02/38607
21

particles making up the wood based composite. It is hypothesized earlier that
there
appears to be a chemical reaction between the oil and copper ammonium acetate
complex wood treatment that effectively epoxidizes the linseed oil into a
strong
bonding agent. While the increase in dimensional stability produced by the use
of oil
and copper ammonium acetate complex wood treatment in combination is
attractive
for composite panel products, the observed improvement in resin bond suggests
that
there may be additional benefits for a composite panel manufacturing
processes. One
is the manufacture of superior panel products, and the other is the
development of a
whole new resin system that could replace a percentage or all of the synthetic
resins
culTently being used by the composite board industry.
Typically, when oriented strandboard mats are pressed under heat and pressure
in the absence of resin, the resulting panel has no strength or integrity. The
flalces can
be separated freely. The flakes would appear to be the same after pressing as
before
blending.
The objective of this study was to investigate the bonding efficacy of the
linseed oil/ copper ammonium acetate complex wood treatment reaction.
Essentially,
we were trying to determine if it is possible to manufacture composite panels
using
little or no synthetic resin, but relying solely on the bond produced by the
interaction
of the oil and preservative.
For this study, aspen strands containing a small percentage of white birch and
red pine were rehydrated from dry to approximately 50% moisture content. The
wet
strands were blended with a mixed solution of copper ammonium acetate complex
wood treatment and Archer Daniels Midland's GP-1125 linseed oil. The final
addition
rate of copper ammonium acetate complex wood treatment in the panel was 3.1%
m/m active and the addition rate of linseed oil was 5.0% m/m active. The
strands were
dried to approximately 4% moisture content after treatment.
One set of the strands was blended with a liquid phenolic resin at a 0.5%
solids addition rate. For the other set the resin blending step was skipped.
Mats (21-
inch by 21-inch inch, 53 cm x 53 cm) were formed with the two sets of oil /
copper
ammonium acetate complex wood treatment treated strands. Mats were pressed in
a
laboratory press to a target panel thickness of '/2 inch (1.2 cm) with a
target density of
42 pcf (0.67 g/cm). Panels were pressed at 400 F (204 C) for a total of 7.5
minutes.


CA 02469234 2004-06-03
WO 03/047852 PCT/US02/38607
22
Internal bond measurements were made on samples of the panels without
synthetic
resin immediately after pressing. Additional internal bond measurements and
dry
static bending assessments were made on test specimens after hot staclcing
overnight.
Coming out of the press the panels made without synthetic resin appeared to
be similar in appearance and behavior to conventional panels bonded with
conventional resin systems. The no-resin panels appeared to be strong and
stiff to the
touch, and when the panels were struck a hard solid sound was returned.
The internal bond measurements of the panels made with no resin (Table 5)
show that a suitable oriented strandboard panel can be produced. The internal
bond
values on panels without resin, straight out of the press (i.e. hot), averaged
34.2 psi
(23.8 N/cm). These values were similar in magnitude to the internal bond
values of
some of the control panels produced in the earlier examples. After hot
stacking
overnight, the internal bond value in these same panels increased to an
average of
38.6 psi (26.9 N/cm2). The IB values for test panels containing 0.5% resin
solids
exhibited an average internal bond of 49.4 psi (34.43 N/cm).
The strength and stiffness of the no-resin panel was slightly better than the
panel containing 0.5% resin solids. Based on the MOR and MOE data, both sets
of
panels (resin and no resin) meet acceptance criteria for randomly produced
oriented
strandboard.


CA 02469234 2004-06-03
WO 03/047852 PCT/US02/38607
23
Table 5: OSB panels made without synthetic resin

Resin level Internal Bond, psi Strength, psi Stiffness, psi
0.5% 49.4 1704 426,700
None 34.2 hot 2201 487,830
38.6 cold

Resin level Internal Bond Strength (MPa) Stiffness (MPa)
(kPa)
0.5% 340.6 11.7 2941.9
None 235.8 hot 15.2 331.3
266.1 cold

The data clearly indicates that there is a strong reaction between the linseed
oil
and copper ammonium acetate complex wood treatment that can be exploited to
produce acceptable strandboard panels without the use of synthetic resins. In
the
previous examples the benefits of a combination of linseed oil and
preservative in the
manufacture of oriented strand board were demonstrated. The intent of this
study was
to investigate the synergy of other agricultural oils and Comptec preservative
on OSB
panel properties. Results for canola, rapeseed, soy and tung oils are
presented relative
to linseed oil.
Seven panel sets were produced. Treatment of flakes was achieved using a
Coil type atomizer and a rotary blender. Green flakes (45% mc) were treated
with
Comptec preservative to achieve a 1% a.i. loading (oven dry weight of flakes
basis)
and a 5% solids basis with different oils (canola (Archer Daniel Midland 81-
060-0),
rapeseed, soy (ADM Golden Chef 104-051), linseed (ADM GP-1125) and tung)
allowing sufficient dwell time for diffusion. Treated flakes were then dried
to a
nominal 2% moisture content. Flakes without treatments and flakes treated with
1%
m/m a.i. Comptec alone were prepared as reference controls.
Face and core liquid formaldehyde resin was added to each batch of the dry
treated furnish at an addition rate of 3.5% along with a petroleum based wax
emulsion
Borden EW58S (1% solids oven dry weight of wood flakes basis). Panels were
hand
formed in a random orientation on mats (21-inch by 21-inch inch, 53 cm x 53
cm).
Mats were pressed in a laboratory press to a target panel thickness of'/2 inch
(1.2 cm)


CA 02469234 2004-06-03
WO 03/047852 PCT/US02/38607
24
with a target density of 42 pcf (0.67 g/cm). Panels were pressed at 380 F (204
C) for
a total of 6 minutes.
Manufactured panels were tested for internal bond, water absorption,
thiclcness
swell and wet Modulus of Rupture. Summarized results are tabulated in Table 6.
Table 6:
A) Internal Bond
Treatment Density (pcf) Density IB (psi) IB (kPa)
(g/cm3)
Comptec only 45.1 (2.7) 0.72 (0.04) 63.5 (10.3) 437.8 (71)
Canola oil 44.9 (2.2) 0.72 (0.04) 49.3 (14.8) 339.9(102)
Linseed 45.6 (2.5) 0.73 (0.04) 93.2 (20.0) 642.6(137)
Rape seed 45.2 (3.2) 0.72 (0.05) 51.6 (8.8) 355.7(61)

Soy 44.5 (2.2) 0.71 (0.04) 56.6 (16.0) 390.2 (110)
Tung 45.4 (2.8) 0.73 (0.04) 120.2 (22.3) 828.7 (154)
Untreated control 45.3 (2.2) 0.73 (0.04) 42.2 (11.0) 290.9 (76)
Figures in brackets represent Standard deviations

B) Wet Bending
Treatment Density (pcf) Density MOR (psi) MOR (MPa)
(g/cm3)
Comptec only 46.8 (2.2) 0.75 (0.04) 2949 (521) 20.3 (3.6)

Canola oil 47.1 (2.3) 0.75 (0.04) 2332 (362) 16.1 (2.5)
Linseed 46.5 (2.6) 0.75 (0.04) 2839 (540) 19.6 (3.7)
Rape seed 45.8 (3.7) 0.73 (0.06) 2486 (473) 17.1 (3.3)
Soy 44.5 (2.2) 0.71 (0.04) 2332 (604) 16.1 (4.2)
Tung 46.7 (2.8) 0.75 (0.04) 3194 (639) 22.0 (4.4)
Untreated control 46.9 (2.0) 0.75 (0.03) 2437 (536) 16.8 (3.7)


CA 02469234 2004-06-03
WO 03/047852 PCT/US02/38607
C: Water Absorption/Thickness Swell

Treatment Density (pcf) Density Absorption Thiclcness
(g/cm3) % Swell (%)
Comptec only 45.4 (1.9) 0.727 (0.03) 30.4 (1.8) 11.0 (0.9)

Canola oil 45.4 (2.6) 0.727 (0.04) 25.8 (5.1) 8.2 (2.3)
Linseed 44.7 (2.1) 0.716 (0.03) 25.0 (6.7) 6.6 (3.3)
Rape seed 45.8 (1.8) 0.734 (0.03) 13.0 (2.3) 4.1 (1.3)
Soy 44.3 (2.5) 0.710 (0.04) 27.8 (2.4) 9.5 (2.1)
Tung 46.8 (1.6) 0.750 (0.03) 24.7 (2.6) 6.8 (1.5)
Untreated control 45.2 (3.0) 0.724 (0.05) 34.7 (5.1) 14.4 (3.0)

As the results in Table 6 illustrate the internal bond (IB) values for all
treated
panels are superior to the IB values untreated control panels. The Comptec
only
treatment yielded an IB of 63.5 psi while the addition of tung and linseed
oils to the
Comptec enhanced the IB values considerably 120 and 93.2 psi respectively.
All treatments provided superior water absorption and thickness swell values
relative to the untreated controls. Rapeseed oil in combination with Comptec
proved
to be the most efficacious of the series with absorption values of 13% and
swelling of
4.1% respectively.
The wet MOR values of the all treated panels were equivalent to the MOR
values of the untreated controls indicating that the strength characteristics
of the
treated boards were not affected by the different treatments.
In conclusion it is apparent that a combination of Comptec with a range of
different agricultural based oils can enhance the performance characteristics
of
oriented strand board.

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 2469234 was not found.

Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date 2009-02-17
(86) PCT Filing Date 2002-12-04
(87) PCT Publication Date 2003-06-12
(85) National Entry 2004-06-03
Examination Requested 2004-06-03
(45) Issued 2009-02-17
Deemed Expired 2010-12-06

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Request for Examination $800.00 2004-06-03
Application Fee $400.00 2004-06-03
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 2 2004-12-06 $100.00 2004-10-21
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 2005-05-30
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 2005-05-30
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 3 2005-12-05 $100.00 2005-10-12
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 4 2006-12-04 $100.00 2006-11-22
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 2007-06-18
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 5 2007-12-04 $200.00 2007-11-22
Final Fee $300.00 2008-09-26
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 6 2008-12-04 $200.00 2008-12-02
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
ARCHER DANIELS MIDLAND COMPANY
VIANCE, LLC
Past Owners on Record
ARCHER, KEVIN J.
CHEMICAL SPECIALTIES, INC.
ROOS, KENNETH D.
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Abstract 2004-06-03 1 56
Claims 2007-07-18 3 84
Claims 2004-06-03 3 81
Description 2004-06-03 25 1,248
Cover Page 2004-08-10 1 38
Description 2007-05-09 25 1,236
Claims 2007-05-09 3 78
Cover Page 2009-01-28 1 39
Prosecution-Amendment 2007-07-18 3 104
Fees 2005-10-12 1 34
PCT 2004-06-03 3 129
Assignment 2004-06-03 3 107
Correspondence 2004-08-06 1 27
Fees 2004-10-21 1 32
Assignment 2005-05-30 14 561
Correspondence 2005-05-30 4 174
Assignment 2004-06-03 7 280
Correspondence 2005-07-22 1 13
Prosecution-Amendment 2006-11-09 2 63
Fees 2006-11-22 1 39
Prosecution-Amendment 2007-05-09 9 354
Prosecution-Amendment 2007-06-29 1 34
Assignment 2007-06-18 15 474
Correspondence 2007-08-08 1 17
PCT 2004-06-04 3 146
Assignment 2007-09-17 2 69
Assignment 2007-09-20 3 106
Correspondence 2007-09-20 2 51
Fees 2007-11-22 1 34
Correspondence 2008-09-26 1 37
Fees 2008-12-02 1 34