Language selection

Search

Patent 2488909 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2488909
(54) English Title: INTERFEROMETRIC MICROWAVE RADAR METHOD
(54) French Title: METHODE RADAR HYPERFREQUENCE INTERFEROMETRIQUE
Status: Granted
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • G01S 13/02 (2006.01)
  • G01S 7/28 (2006.01)
  • G01S 13/90 (2006.01)
  • G01S 7/00 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • EINEDER, MICHAEL (Germany)
(73) Owners :
  • DEUTSCHES ZENTRUM FUER LUFT- UND RAUMFAHRT E.V. (Germany)
(71) Applicants :
  • DEUTSCHES ZENTRUM FUER LUFT- UND RAUMFAHRT E.V. (Germany)
(74) Agent: BERESKIN & PARR LLP/S.E.N.C.R.L.,S.R.L.
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2010-07-27
(22) Filed Date: 2004-11-26
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 2005-05-28
Examination requested: 2004-11-26
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
103 56 351.2 Germany 2003-11-28

Abstracts

English Abstract

Phase ambiguities measured in an interferometric microwave radar method are resolved by phase unwrapping in the form of analyzing two interferograms based on different wavelengths, from which a so-called delta k interferogram is obtained having a substantially greater wavelength serving as a value for estimating the absolute phase without further unwrapping. For this purpose, two trains of radar transmission pulses are generated at the transmitter end operated in separate different wavelength ranges and each pulse of which is always emitted simultaneously or sequenced in time in thus forming together a train of two- wavelength pulses. At the receiver end the received signal spectrum is split into two sub-bands each containing one of the two different wavelength ranges, and the interferograms materializing in these two sub-bands are added to result in the delta k interferogram which is then employed as the value for estimating the absolute phase and thus also the absolute distance measured value for the pixels. Applications in generating elevation models and in aerospace sensing object and flow velocities.


French Abstract

Les ambiguïtés de phase mesurées dans une méthode interférométrique par radar hyperfréquence sont corrigées par déroulement de phase, en ayant recours à l'analyse de deux interférogrammes selon deux longueurs d'ondes différentes, à partir desquelles on obtient un interférogramme dit delta k dont la longueur d'onde substantiellement plus grande sert de valeur pour évaluer la phase absolue sans aucun autre déroulement. € cette fin, deux trains d'impulsions radar de transmission sont générés à l'extrémité émetteur fonctionnant dans des plages de longueurs d'ondes différentes et distinctes, et chaque impulsion est toujours émises simultanément ou consécutivement dans le temps de manière à former un train d'impulsions de deux longueurs d'ondes. € l'extrémité récepteur, le spectre du signal reçu est divisé en deux sous-bandes, chacune comportant une des deux plages différentes de longueurs d'ondes. Les interférogrammes obtenus dans ces deux sous-bandes sont additionnés pour l'obtention de l'interférogramme delta k qui est ensuite employé comme valeur pour évaluer la phase absolue et donc également la mesure de la distance absolue pour les pixels. L'invention peut être employée dans des applications comme la modélisation de hauteurs, la détection d'objets dans l'espace et les débits d'écoulement.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.



10
Claims

1. An interferometric microwave radar method with a
synthetic aperture (SAR), wherein, upon a phase
difference analysis performed after a coherent
demodulation of echo signals of a pulsed radar
transmission signal transmitted from a transmitter end,
said echo signals being received with their spectrum at a
receiver end at two different positions resulting in two
received signals, any occurring phase ambiguities are
resolved by phase unwrapping realized by analyzing two
interferograms formed in different wavelength ranges,
from which a so-called delta-k-interferogram of a
substantially greater wavelength is obtained, which,
without any further unwrapping serves as an absolute
phase estimate, the spectrum of the received signal
therefore being split into two sub-bands, each including
a respective one of the two different wavelength ranges,
and the interferograms occurring in those two sub-bands
being calculated to obtain said delta-k-interferogram,
comprising following steps of:
generating two separate radar transmission pulse trains
on the transmitter end when forming the pulsed radar
transmission signal, said two radar pulse transmission
trains being driven in separate different wavelength
ranges within a predetermined band width range and each
pulse of which is always emitted simultaneously and in
parallel or sequenced in time in thus forming together a
train of two-wavelength pulses, and
employing the delta-k-interferogram calculated at the
receiver end as an estimate of absolute phase and thus
also as an absolute measured value of distance sensed for
pixels.


11
2. The interferometric microwave radar method as set
forth in claim 1 wherein a data reduction in the sub-
bands is obtained by decimating the received signals from
an analog/digital conversion performed in a process of
interferogram data processing.

3. The interferometric microwave radar method as set
forth in claim 2 comprising use of two separate filters
on the receiving end for a signal filtering of the two
sub-bands, each comprising a respective one of the two
different wavelength ranges.

4. The interferometric microwave radar method as set
forth in claim 1 wherein in generating the train of two-
wavelength pulses a carrier at the transmitter end is
modulated with a two frequency chirp in each single
pulse.

5. The interferometric microwave radar method as set
forth in claim 4 wherein for each single pulse of the
train of two-wavelength pulses a linear frequency
modulated chirp is employed.

6. A device for performing the interferometric
microwave radar method of claim 1 comprising separate
microwave assemblies adapted to realize the two different
wavelength ranges, said assemblies sharing transmission
and receiving antennas.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.



CA 02488909 2004-11-26
1
Title:

Interferometric Microwave Radar Method

The invention relates to an interferometric microwave radar
method,-particularly including a synthetic aperture (SAR),
wherein in phase difference analysis undertaken by coherent
demodulation of the echo signals of pulse radar
transmission signals received in two different positions,
any resulting phase ambiguities are resolved by phase
unwrapping in the form of analyzing two interferograms
based on different wavelengths, from which a so-called
delta k interferogram of substantially greater wavelength
is obtained, serving as a value for estimating the absolute
phase without further unwrapping.

In radar interferometry the phase is analyzed as measured
in a radar system with coherent demodulation of the
received signal. Since the distance resolution of a
microwave radar is much coarser than the wavelength,
although this phase furnishes highly accurate relative
distance sensing between neighboring pixels, it produces no
absolute values for pixel sensing. Apart from this, phase
sensing is available in principle only in the range -180
to +180 , and is, in other words, ambiguous.
Practically all applications of radar interferometry suffer
hitherto from this ambiguity, e.g. in generating digital
terrain models, mapping geological deformations or in
sensing vehicle velocities.

This ambiguity is resolved in the majority of the
applications by unwrapping the phase by analyzing the
gradients to the neighboring pixels.


CA 02488909 2004-11-26
2

Most of the known phase unwrapping techniques attempt to
achieve a consistently correct solution solely from
ambiguously sensed values, basically making it impossible
to come to a physically unambiguous correct solution. The
reason for this is that various physical constellations can
produce the same sensed values, experience having shown
that such problematic constellations materialize not only
in theory but often also in nature.

The sole alternative is accordingly to take into account
external prior knowledge in the process of phase
unwrapping. This necessitates being previously aware of the
sensing parameter with the accuracy of the wavelength X, as
is, however, only very seldom the case.

One possibility of establishing at least a constant phase
offset of the full image reads from the paper by S.N.
Madsen: "On absolute phase determination techniques in SAR
interferometry", SPIE Conference on Radar Sensor
Technology, April 19-21, 1995, pages 393-401. To compute
the absolute distance between the radar sensor and a
backscatter object with wavelength accuracy, use is made of
the minimally different wavelengths within the radar
frequency spectrum. Referring now to FIG. 1 there is
illustrated how for this purpose an interferogram is formed
in each case from the upper and lower sideband, a so-called
delta k interferogram being obtained from these two
interferograms fl and f2. This delta k interferogram
corresponds to an interferogram having the substantially
greater wavelength 1(1/X1-1/X2) which can serve as a value
for estimating the absolute phase in broad ranges without
further phase unwrapping by scaling with the ratio of the


CA 02488909 2004-11-26
3

carrier frequency fo to the distance of the frequency bands
B/2. For radar sensors as used nowadays this ratio is a
very large number between 1000 and 3000, this being the
reason why the error in the estimate is correspondingly
high. It is because of this that the relative unwrapped
phase is subtracted from the interferogram fa and the
difference is averaged over the full image, i.e. over
several million pixels.

One indication of being able to derive even the absolute
phase of single pixels by this known technique reads from
the paper by Engen, G., Guneriussen, T., Overein O.; "New
Approach for Snow Water Equivalent (SWE) estimation using
repeat pass interferometric SAR", IGARSS 2003.

Unfortunately, because of the small differences in
wavelength this known interferometric technique is highly
prone to error, is seldom mentioned in pertinent literature
and also finds hardly any application in actual practice.
Techniques for phase unwrapping as known hitherto in
interferometric radar are thus unreliable and in general no
measure of the error can also be stated. Although the value
as measured in the interferogram is precise to a
millimeter, the real value may be imprecise by multiples of
the wavelength, i.e. centimeters or even several meters.
Accordingly, making use of the delta k interferometric
technique for phase unwrapping has hitherto been a failure
for lack of accuracy, it finding mention hitherto only for
establishing the constant absolute phase offset value of
the image as a whole (Madsen) as well as the absolute phase


CA 02488909 2009-04-20

4
of discrete, very strong single point scatterers (G. Engen
et al.).

The invention is thus based on the objective of reliably
resolving the phase ambiguities with zero error in
interferometric radar techniques as correctly indicated
for each and every pixel of an image without undue
additional complication technically.

In accordance with the invention there is provided an
interferometric microwave radar method with a synthetic
aperture (SAR), wherein, upon a phase difference analysis
performed after a coherent demodulation of echo signals of
a pulsed radar transmission signal transmitted from a
transmitter end, said echo signals being received with
their spectrum at a receiver end at two different
positions resulting in two received signals, any occurring
phase ambiguities are resolved by phase unwrapping
realized by analyzing two interferograms formed in
different wavelength ranges, from which a so-called delta-
k-interferogram of a substantially greater wavelength is
obtained, which, without any further unwrapping serves as
an absolute phase estimate, the spectrum of the received
signal therefore being split into two sub-bands, each
including a respective one of the two different wavelength
ranges, and the interferograms occurring in those two sub-
bands being calculated to obtain said delta-k-
interferogram, comprising following steps of:
generating two separate radar transmission pulse trains on
the transmitter end when forming the pulsed radar
transmission signal, said two radar pulse transmission
trains being driven in separate different wavelength
ranges within a predetermined band width range and each
pulse of which is always emitted simultaneously and in


CA 02488909 2009-04-20
4a

parallel or sequenced in time in thus forming together a
train of two-wavelength pulses, and
employing the delta-k-interferogram calculated at the
receiver end as an estimate of absolute phase and thus
also as an absolute measured value of distance sensed for
pixels.

The invention thus involves precisely optimizing an
interferometric radar method for delta k interferometry.
The technical means for achieving this are modest and can
be easily supplemented in interferometric radar sensors.

25


CA 02488909 2004-11-26

The method in accordance with the invention will now be
detailed with reference to the drawings in which:

FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an assembly for
5 implementing the interferometric radar technique
with delta k interferometry as known from the
aforementioned paper by S.N.Madsen:

FIG. 2 is a graph showing the frequency spectrum of a
parallel two-frequency pulse as a function of
time for the improved delta k interferometry by
the method in accordance with the invention;

FIG. 3 is likewise a graph showing the frequency
spectrum of a sequential two=frequency pulse as a
function of time for the improved delta k
interferometry by the method in accordance with
the invention;

FIG. 4 is a rough block diagram of an interferometric
radar system for implementing the invention with
a SAR processor, the optimizations achieved by
the invention for the delta k interferometry
being highlighted shaded;

FIG. 5 is a diagram showing the receiver spectrum of the
radar signal with 1/6 of the total bandwidth in
the sub-bands;

FIG. 6 is a diagram showing the receiver spectrum of the
radar signal decimated by the factor 3, the
repetition spectra being highlighted heavily
shaded, and


CA 02488909 2004-11-26
6

FIG. 7 is a block diagram of a circuit for implementing
processing of the interferometric radar data in
the method in accordance with the invention, the
phase constant n being derived from
interferometric delta k processing.

In the interferometric radar method in accordance with the
invention the conventional radar transmitter is modified
into a two-frequency transmitter by modulating the carrier
signal with a two-frequency chirp. As compared to prior art
as explained at the outset, this achieves, for the same
channel bandwidth, a substantially greater spacing of the
frequency channels in thus significantly enhancing the
accuracy of the delta k interferometry method.
Concentrating the transmitter power to a narrow bandwidth
improves the signal-to-noise ratio.

Referring now to FIG. 2 there is illustrated as a function
of time the frequency spectrum of a parallel two-frequency
pulse, i.e. existing simultaneously with its single pulses,
as emitted by the radar transmitter. For each single pulse
of the two parallel pulse trains a linear modulated chirp
is used over the pulse duration, for example. With the one
single pulse the frequency linearly increases during the
pulse duration about the frequency fl whereas with the
other pulse the linear increase is about the higher
frequency f2.

Even larger differences in frequency are achievable as long
as the electronic modules used in common permit. Thus,
common reflector antennas can be used, for example,


CA 02488909 2004-11-26
7

signalled with horns in different frequency bands, for
instance X-band and Ku-band.

Referring now to FIG. 3 there is illustrated how likewise
the two single pulses of the two pulse trains can be
transmitted one after the other in time, as evident from
the frequency spectrum graph as a function of time.

The conventional radar receiver is modified in application
of the interferometric radar method in accordance with the
invention into a two-frequency receiver having a common
arialog/digital conversion followed by a sub-sampler.

Referring now to FIG. 4 there is illustrated in a
diagrammatic circuit diagram a radar system working with a
synthetic aperture (SAR) for implementing the method in
accordance with the invention with the modules modified for
improved delta k interferometry, indicated shaded. FIG. 5
shows in addition the spectrum of the received radar
signal.

Using two separate sub-band filters in the receiver makes
for an improved signal-to-noise ratio as compared to use of
a wideband filter as employed in prior art should
decimation in the analog/digital conversion of the
interferometric signal be provided. Decimation to the
effectively used bandwidth of the channels is possible when
the width and spacing of the channels as well as the
decimation ratio are suitably selected.

Referring now to FIG. 6 there is illustrated in this case
how the signal of a wideband receiver, but also how the sum
of two narrow band receivers can be decimated by a factor


CA 02488909 2004-11-26
8

of 3 without the repetition spectra (shown heavily shaded)
overlapping. This decimation is a major advantage over
prior art delta k interferometry as aforementined since the
data rate is reduced to a fraction for the same total
bandwidth. This data reduction is very important especially
when radar interferometry is employed in satellite systems.
If use is made of various frequency bands with a difference
of more than a few hundred MHz, it is of advantage to
sample the analog data separately. Mixing the two channels
in this case is done digitally in capturing the data
stream, in thus enhancing the signal quality whilst
facilitating separating the frequency channels in
processing.

Referring now to FIG. 7 there is illustrated how the data
is processed in a block diagram, whereby the same as in
FIG. 4 SLC stands for "single look complex image", in other
words the focussed image product as usual in a complex
visualization. To make for a better understanding, deriving
the phase constant n from interferometric delta k
processing is illustrated here merely incompletely and in a
simplified way, it being somewhat more complicated in the
embodiment as actually achieved.

For the improved interferometric radar method in accordance
with the invention there exists a whole series of
applications of considerable potential as regards marketing
and scientific importance.

Thus, highly accurate digital elevation models even of
difficult mountainous areas in which hitherto the phase


CA 02488909 2004-11-26
9

ambiguity was non-resolvable can now be produced by space
satellites.

It can also be used for aerospace sensing the velocity of
traffic, glaciers and ocean currents, it being particularly
in the case of single vehicles that even higher velocities
outside of the ambiguity interval can now be resolved by
application of the interferometric radar method in
accordance with the invention.

It will be appreciated that the method as described can be
put to use, of course, not only on satellites but also in
aircraft.

20
30

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date 2010-07-27
(22) Filed 2004-11-26
Examination Requested 2004-11-26
(41) Open to Public Inspection 2005-05-28
(45) Issued 2010-07-27

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Request for Examination $800.00 2004-11-26
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 2004-11-26
Application Fee $400.00 2004-11-26
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 2 2006-11-27 $100.00 2006-10-20
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 3 2007-11-26 $100.00 2007-10-24
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 4 2008-11-26 $100.00 2008-10-09
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 5 2009-11-26 $200.00 2009-10-08
Final Fee $300.00 2010-05-12
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 6 2010-11-26 $200.00 2010-10-15
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 7 2011-11-28 $200.00 2011-10-19
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 8 2012-11-26 $200.00 2012-10-19
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 9 2013-11-26 $200.00 2013-10-15
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 10 2014-11-26 $250.00 2014-10-15
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 11 2015-11-26 $250.00 2015-10-15
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 12 2016-11-28 $250.00 2016-10-13
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 13 2017-11-27 $250.00 2017-10-16
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 14 2018-11-26 $250.00 2018-10-16
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 15 2019-11-26 $450.00 2019-10-17
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 16 2020-11-26 $450.00 2020-10-13
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 17 2021-11-26 $459.00 2021-10-15
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 18 2022-11-28 $458.08 2022-10-12
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 19 2023-11-27 $473.65 2023-10-11
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
DEUTSCHES ZENTRUM FUER LUFT- UND RAUMFAHRT E.V.
Past Owners on Record
EINEDER, MICHAEL
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Description 2009-04-20 10 338
Claims 2009-04-20 2 72
Cover Page 2005-05-13 1 57
Abstract 2004-11-26 1 31
Description 2004-11-26 9 318
Claims 2004-11-26 2 65
Drawings 2004-11-26 5 104
Representative Drawing 2005-05-02 1 21
Cover Page 2010-07-12 2 64
Assignment 2004-11-26 4 110
Prosecution-Amendment 2005-03-10 2 48
Prosecution-Amendment 2007-10-02 1 25
Prosecution-Amendment 2008-10-20 4 131
Prosecution-Amendment 2009-04-20 6 222
Correspondence 2010-05-12 1 42