Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
CA 02492207 2005-O1-10
WO 2004/011123 PCT/US2003/018844
MOLDED FILTER ELEMENT THAT CONTAINS THERMALLY
BONDED STAPLE FIBERS AND ELECTRICALLY-CHARGED MICROFIBERS
The present invention pertains to a molded filter element that includes
thermally-
bonded staple fibers amd non-thermally bonded electrically-charged
microfibers. Filter
elements of this invention may be used in face masks that protect the wearer
and others
from exposure to contaminants.
BACKGROUND
Filter elements that use microfibers to capture airborne particulates have
been
known and used for many years. The microfiber-containing filter elements are
commonly
used in respirators to supply clean filtered air to the wearer - see, for
example, U.S.
Patent 5,656,368 to Braun et al., U.S. Patent 5,307,796 to Kronzer et al., and
U.S. Patent
4,729,371 to Krueger et al. An electric charge is typically placed on the
microfibers to
improve their capturing efficiency. In 1980, Kubik et al. described a method
for
introducing a persistent electric charge into meltblown microfibers during
fiber formation
(see U.S. Patent 4,215,682). After the Kubik et al. development, other
charging techniques
were developed for making electret microfibers - see, for example, U.S.
Patents
4,588,537 to Klaase et al., 5,227,172 to Deeds et al., and 5,496,507 to
Angadjivand et al.
When used as a filter element, webs of electrically-charged microfibers have
been
commonly supported by another structure. Although the webs typically possess
sufficient
integrity to be handleable by themselves as a mat, they do not possess
sufficient structural
stiffiiess to exhibit more than transitory shape retention. ' Thus, in
respirators, the
microfiber-containing filter webs are regularly supported by a permanently-
molded
shaping layer. The filter web is positioned over the shaping layer and is
secured to it to
assume its molded configuration. Examples of patents that disclose the use of
a separate
shaping layer to support a microfiber-containing filter layer in a respirator
include U.S.
Patents 4,536,440 to Berg, 4,807,619 to Dyrud et al., and 4,850,347 to Skov.
In the Berg and Dyrud et al. patents, the shaping layer comprises fibers that
are
bonded to one another and to other fibers at points of fiber intersection
throughout the
, molded web. The fibers that are used to achieve the desired molded
configuration of the
shaping layer preferably are thermally-bondable bicomponent fibers that are
rather course
-1-
CA 02492207 2005-O1-10
WO 2004/011123 PCT/US2003/018844
or large in size, that is, 10 denier or larger. In Skov, the shaping layer
takes the form of an
open-work molded plastic mesh.
In addition to these structures, filtering webs of polymeric microfiber also
have
been retained in a shaped configuration through use of fabrics, spaced bands,
filaments, or
fibers - see U.S. Patent 5,656,368 to Braun et al., which describes placing
these shape
retaining elements across the tops of corrugations in a nonwoven web to
maintain its
corrugated condition. Braun et al. also explain that nonwoven webs of
polymeric
microfiber need to be maintained in a lofty condition in order to obtain
optimal filtration
performance. Filtration parameters such as pressure drop and service life can
be
negatively impacted when webs of polymeric microfiber are compacted.
In yet another approach to maintaining the shape of a nonwoven web of
microfibers, the shape retention is provided not by an external structure such
as a shaping
layer but instead by the microfibers themselves. In this approach, which is
described in
U.S. Patent 6,057,256 to Krueger et al., the microfibers are made from two
components:
the first being a fiber support component, and the second being a thermo-
softening or
bonding component. During molding, the web is heated to a temperature greater
than the
second component's softening temperature to create bonds between adjacent
fibers. The
bonds occur where the softened components engage each other at points of fiber
intersection. Thus, while the first component provides the fibrous support to
the web,
which prevents it from collapsing or coalescing, the second component allows
it to be
molded into a particular shape. The product may also include staple fibers to
open or
loosen the web.
With the exception of the bicomponent microfiber product described by I~rueger
et
al., the means for supporting and providing shape to a microfiber-containing
filter web is
achieved by a separate or non-integral supporting structure. These products
therefore
require that the microfiber-containing web be manufactured separate from the
supporting
structure and also require that there be an apparatus for joining the two
elements together
to create the resulting composite article. The use of these additional
manufacturing steps,
and the need for the additional manufacturing equipment to accomplish these
steps, adds
to the final cost of the product. In addition, care needs to be taken when
handling the
-2-
CA 02492207 2005-O1-10
WO 2004/011123 PCT/US2003/018844
microfiber-containing webs so that the webs do not become damaged and suffer a
loss in
filtration performance as taught by Braun et al.
Although Krueger et al. were able to achieve a molded microfiber-containing
filter
element without using a separate supporting structure, their product, however,
relies on the
microfiber itself for furnishing the structure to the mask. When the
microfibers become
bonded together for this purpose, they have a tendency to not fully serve
their primary
mission of filtering particles from the airstream that passes through the web.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention provides, in brief summary, a new filter element that
may
suitably comprise or consists essentially of a porous molded web that contains
thermally
bonded staple fibers and non-thermally bonded electrically-charged
microfibers. The
molded web is retained on its molded configuration, at least in part, by bonds
between the
staple fibers at points of fiber intersection.
The filter element of the invention allows a shaped structure to be created
without
using of a separate supporting structure. The inventive filter element also
does not need to
bond the microfibers together for purposes of maintaining the molded shape of
the
nonwoven web. Because the thermally-bonded staple fibers and the non-thermally
bonded
electrically-charged microfibers are present in the same layer, the web can be
molded into
a variety of configurations without using thermally-bonded bicomponent
microfibers.
There also is no need for a separate supporting structure or a need to join
the layer of
microfibers to the additional structure.
The filter elements of the present invention can yield a desirable combination
of
good filtration performance and good structural integrity, even though the
filter elements
may be subjected to compression during the molding operation. The good
performance
and structural characteristics are able to be achieved despite previous
thought that filtration
parameters such as pressure drop and service life could be negatively impacted
when a
nonwoven web of polymeric microfibers was subject to additional handling such
as from a
molding operation. Previously known filtration structures, such as those
described in the
'368 patent to Braun et al., need to maintain a lofty web condition to obtain
optimal
filtration performance. The present invention, however, is able to demonstrate
good
-3-
CA 02492207 2005-O1-10
WO 2004/011123 PCT/US2003/018844
mechanical and filtration properties, in conjunction with a simplified
operation for creating
a shaped filter element. The present invention therefore can produce a molded
filter
element that is a good candidate for use in a molded respiratory mask.
GLOSSARY
In reference to the invention, the following terms are defined as set forth
below:
"denier" means the weight in grams of 9,000 meters of filament;
"electrically-charged" means the fibers possess electric charge that is
capable of
being measured and is present on the fibers for more than transitory duration;
"filter element" means a fluid permeable structure that is capable of removing
contaminants from a fluid that passes through it;
"microfibers" mean fibers that have indeterminate length and that have an
average
geometric fiber diameter of about 15 micrometers (~.m) or less;
"molded web" means a structure that is substantially larger in two dimensions
than
in a third and that has been formed into a desired shape such as a face mask,
a furnace
filter, a panel or series of panels, et cetera;
"molding temperature" means the temperature at which the web is heated to
accomplish molding;
"non-thermally bonded" means the fibers do not substantially bond to adjacent
contacting fibers after being heated to a temperature suitable for molding a
web into which
the non-thermally bonded fibers are contained;
"porous" means fluid permeable;
"solidity" means the percent solids in a web and is expressed as a unitless
fraction
where a greater number indicates a greater solids' fraction; and
"softening temperature" means the lowest temperature at which a fiber
component
is softened to an extent that permits that fiber component to bond to another
fiber and
retain that bonded condition when cooled;
"staple fibers" mean fibers that have determinate length;
"thermally bondable fibers" mean fibers that can bond to adjacent contacting
fibers
after being heated to at least above their softening temperature and being
subsequently
cooled;
-4-
CA 02492207 2005-O1-10
WO 2004/011123 PCT/US2003/018844
"thermally bonded fibers" mean fibers that are bonded to adjacent contacting
fibers
after being heated to at least above their softening temperature and being
subsequently
cooled.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
S FIG. 1 is a photograph (magnified 100 x) of a nonwoven web 10 that may be
molded to produce a filter element according to the present invention.
FIG. 2 is a photograph (magnified 100 x) of a web 10' that has been molded to
produce a filter element according to the present invention.
FIG. 3 is a side view showing an example of a filtering face mask 16 of the
present
invention being worn by a person.
FIG. 4 is a sectional view that is taken along the lines 4-4 of FIG. 3.
FIG. 5 is a partial sectional view of an apparatus 29 that may be used to form
a web
10 that contains both staple fibers and microfibers.
FIG. 6 is a perspective view of a water jet spray apparatus that may be used
to
impart electric charge to a fibrous web 10.
FIG. 7 is a side view, in partial cross-section, of an apparatus 54 that may
be used
for forming a face mask body 22 according to the present invention.
FIG. 8 is a cross-sectional view that has been taken along lines 8-8 of FIG.
7.
FIG. 9 is a cross-sectional view that has been taken along lines 9-9 of FIG.
7.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
FIG. 1 shows a nonwoven web 10 that can be used to produce a molded filter
element in accordance with this invention. As shown in the photo, the web 10
may
comprise thermally bondable staple fibers 12 and non-thermally bonded
microfibers 14.
The staple fibers 12 are distributed throughout the network of non-thermally
bonded
microfibers 14. The thermally bondable staple fibers 12 provide a more lofty,
less dense
web than a web made from the non-thermally bonded microfibers alone. The pre-
molded
web typically has a solidity of about 5 to 30%, more typically about 10 to
20%. W a
preferred embodiment, the web comprises about 30 to 70 weight % thermally
bondable
staple fibers, and more preferably about 40 to 60 weight % thermally bondable
staple
fibers, based on the weight of the fibers in the web. The web also preferably
comprises
-5-
CA 02492207 2005-O1-10
WO 2004/011123 PCT/US2003/018844
about 30 to 70 weight % non-thermally bondable microfibers, and more
preferably about
40 to 60 weight % non-thermally bondable microfibers, based on the weight of
fibers in
the web. In a more preferred embodiment, there would be about 50 to 60 weight
microfibers, and about 40 to 50 weight % staple fibers. Thus, it is preferred
that the web
contain more microfibers than staple fibers by weight.
The staple fibers 12 are thermally bondable, which allows these fibers to bond
to
adjacent contacting fibers after they have been heated above their softening
temperature
and have been cooled. The staple fibers have a determinate length, that is,
they are
typically machine cut to a specific predetermined or identifiable length. They
are also
made by processes where the fiber diameter more closely resembles the diameter
of the
orifice through which the fiber is extruded. The length of the staple fibers
typically is less
than 2 feet or 0.61 meters, or is less than 1 foot or 0.305 meters. The staple
fibers
preferably would have a length of about 1 to 8 centimeters (cm) (0.4 inches to
3.2 inches),
more preferably about 2.5 cm to 5 cm (1 to 2 inches). The average geometric
fiber
diameter for the staple fibers is generally greater than about 15 ~,m on
average, and
typically is greater than 20, 30, 40, or 50 ~m on average. This fiber diameter
can be
calculated according to the test set forth below. The staple fibers also
generally have a
denier of greater than about 3 g/9,000 m, and greater than about 4 g/9,000 m.
At the upper
limit, the denier is typically less than about 50 g/m and more commonly is
less than about
20 g/m to 15 g/m.
The staple fibers are typically of the synthetic variety so that they can be
bonded to
each other during the molding process. The staple fibers typically are made
from
polymeric materials that soften and bond to other fibers when heated and
cooled. Staple
fibers that are suitable for use in the present invention may be prepared from
polyethylene
terephthalate, polyester, polyethylene, polypropylene, copolyester, polyamide,
or
combinations thereof. The staple fibers typically retain much of their fiber
structure after
bonding. The staple fibers rnay be crimped fibers like the fibers described in
U.S. Patent
4,118,531 to Hauser. Crimped fibers have a continuous wavy, curly, or jagged
character
along their length. The staple fibers preferably comprise crimped fibers that
comprise
about 10 to 30 crimps per cm (5.1 to 11.9 crimps per inch). The staple fibers
may be
single component fibers or mufti-component fibers. Examples of commercially
available
-6-
CA 02492207 2005-O1-10
WO 2004/011123 PCT/US2003/018844
single component thermally bondable staple fibers include KOSA T-255, T-259, T-
271,
and T-295, available from Kosa of Charlotte, North Carolina; and Type 410
PETG, Type
110 PETG, available from Foss Manufacturing Inc., of Hampton, New Hampshire.
The
multi-component fibers may have two or more fiber components, where at least
one of the
components will soften during heating to allow the staple fibers to be bonded
to each other
at points of fiber intersection. The mufti-component fibers may be bicomponent
fibers that
have a coextensive side-by-side configuration, a coextensive concentric sheath-
core
configuration, or a coextensive elliptical sheath-core configuration.
Bicomponent fibers
are generally characterized by having two major fiber components. Examples of
bicomponent fibers that may be used as the thermally bonded staple fibers in
the present
invention include KOSA T-254, T-256, and polypropylene/polyethylene
bicomponent
fibers (CHISSO ES, ESC, EAC, EKC) and polypropylene/polypropylene bicomponent
fiber (CHISSO EPC) and polypropylene/polyethylene-terephthalate bicomponent
fiber
(CHISSO ETC) sold by Chisso Inc. of Osaka, Japan.
The microfibers that are used in the present invention have an average
geometric
fiber diameter of about 15 ~.m or less, more typically about 12 pm or less.
Unlike staple
fibers, which have specific or identifiable length, the microfibers have an
indeterminate
length. The average geometric fiber diameter of the microfibers generally is
about 3 to 10
~.m.
The microfibers may take the form of an entangled web of electrically-charged
melt-blown microfibers. Melt-blown microfibers or BMF can be created by
extruding a
fiber-forming material through a die orifice into a gaseous stream - see, for
example,
U.S. Patent 4,215,682 to Kubik et al. Melt-blown microfibers, when randomly
entangled
in a web, typically have sufficient integrity to be handled by themselves as a
mat. But they
typically cannot be molded into a desired configuration without adversely
impacting the
filtration properties of the web. Examples of materials that may be used to
make melt-
blown microfibers are disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 5,706,804 to Baumann et
al., U.S.
Patent No. 4,419,993 to Peterson, U.S. Reissue Patent No. Re. 28,102 to
Mayhew, U.S.
Patents 5,472,481 and 5,411,576 to Jones et al., and U.S. Patent 5,908,598 to
Rousseau et
al. Blown microfibers may be prepared from essentially any thermoplastic fiber-
forming
resin. To ensure that the webs maintain satisfactory electret properties or
charge
_7_
CA 02492207 2005-O1-10
WO 2004/011123 PCT/US2003/018844
separation, the microfibers are formed from non-conductive resins, that is,
resins having a
volume resistivity of 1014 ohm-centimeters or greater at room temperature (22
°C).
Preferably, the volume resistivity is about 1016 ohm-cm or greater.
Resistivity of the
polymeric fiber-forming material can be measured according to standardized
test ASTM D
257-93. The fiber-forming material used to form the melt blown fibers also
should be
substantially free from components such as antistatic agents that could
increase the
electrical conductivity or otherwise interfere with the fiber's ability to
accept and hold
electrostatic charges. Some examples of polymers that may be used in the
polymeric fiber-
forming material include thermoplastic polymers containing polycarbonates,
polyesters,
polyamides, polyurethanes, block copolymers such as styrene-butadiene-styrene
and
styrene-isoprene-styrene block copolymers, and polyolefins such as
polypropylene,
polybutylene, and poly(4-methyl-1-pentene), or combination of such resins. For
filtration
applications, the fibers are commonly made from poly-4-methyl-1 pentene and/or
polypropylene. Preferably, the melt-blown microfibers are prepared from the
homopolymer polypropylene because of its ability to retain electric charge,
particularly in
moist environments.
W addition to thermally bonded staple fibers and non-thermally bonded
microfibers, filter elements of the present invention may comprise non-
thermally bonded
staple fibers made from, for example, polyester and/or polypropylene,
including viscose
rayon and FR fibers for absorbing moisture or providing flame retardency.
The fibrous materials may contain additives to enhance filtration performance,
including the additives described in U.S. Patents 5,025,052 and 5,099,026 to
Crater et al.
and may also have low levels of extractable hydrocarbons to improve filtration
performance - see, for example, U.S. Patent 6,213,122 to Rousseau et al.
Fibrous webs
also may be fabricated to have increased oily mist resistance as shown in U.S.
Patent
4,874,399 to Reed et al., and in U.S. Patents 6,238,466 and 6,068,799, both to
Rousseau et
al. The fibrous webs may be fluorinated as described in International
Publication
WO 00/01737. In a preferred embodiment for filtering contaminants in an oily
mist
environment, the fibers have fluorine atoms at the surface of the fibers as
taught in U.S.
Patents 6,409,806, 6,398,847 B1, and 6,397,458 to Jones et al.
_8_
CA 02492207 2005-O1-10
WO 2004/011123 PCT/US2003/018844
FIG. 2 shows an enlarged photograph of a molded web 10' that contains both
thermally bonded staple fibers and non-thermally bonded microfibers. As shown,
the
staple fibers 12 are bonded to each other at points of fiber intersection 13.
The microfibers
14, on the other hand, have generally maintained their unbonded orientation.
Although the
staple fibers 12 are bonded to each other at fiber intersection points, the
bonds do not need
to occur at all such points. Fiber bonding only need to occur at a sufficient
number of
intersections to allow the molded product to retain its desired shape for more
than
transitory duration. The bonding between the staple fibers provides a semi-
rigid three-
dimensional lattice of fibers in the molded web 10'. Because the staple fibers
are heated
above the softening temperature of the bonding component in the fibers, and
perhaps to
their melting temperature, the bonding components) of the fibers softens and
merges
together at a sufficient number of points where the fibers contact each other
13. To avoid
damaging or otherwise altering the integrity of the microfibers during the
molding process,
the web is molded adequately below the softening temperature of essentially
all
components of the microfibers. Although the microfibers that have been
produced by a
melt-blowing technique will tend to bond to, or become seriously entangled
with, each
other during the melt-blowing process, the microfibers generally do not become
bonded to
each other during the heating process of the molding operation. The
microfibers may,
however, bond to the staple fibers when the bonding components) in those
fibers softens
and subsequently hardens. As shown, the staple fibers 12 melt and coalesce at
points of
fiber intersection 13. It is this bonding of the staple fibers that makes a
major contribution
to the shaped structure of the molded product. The molded product 10'
comprises staple
fibers and microfibers in essentially the same weight percentages as the non-
molded web
described above with reference to FIG. 1.
Molded filter elements of the present invention may have a thickness of about
1.0
to 4 mm. Although larger thicknesses of up to 6 mm may be produced, the filter
element
will commonly be approximately 1.0 to 3.5 mm thick. It has been discovered in
this
invention that good filtration performance can be achieved for the inventive
molded
product at thicknesses that are about 1.3 to 3.0 mm. The molded filter element
also may
have a solidity of about 5 to 30%, and typically about 10 to 20%. The basis
weight of the
-9-
CA 02492207 2005-O1-10
WO 2004/011123 PCT/US2003/018844
molded filter element can be about 50 to 300 grams per square meter (g/ma),
typically
about 100 to 200 g/m2.
FIG. 3 shows one example of a molded product that can be produced from a
molded web such as the one shown in FIG. 2. As illustrated, the molded product
may take
the shape of a cup-shaped respiratory mask 16 that fits over the nose and
mouth of a
wearer. The face mask 16 may have an exhalation valve (not shown) disposed
centrally on
the mask body to allow exhaled air to become rapidly purged from the maslc
interior. The
mask 16 may be configured in a generally cup-shaped configuration when worn to
fit
snugly over a person's nose and mouth. The mask 16 is desirably formed to
maintain a
substantially leak-free contact with the wearer's face at its periphery 18.
The mask 16 may
be drawn tightly against the wearer's face around the mask periphery by a
harness such as
bands 20 that extend behind the wearer's head and neck when the mask is worn.
The mask
16 forms an interior gas space between the mask body and the wearer's face.
This interior
gas space is separated from the ambient or atmospheric air by the mask body
22. Air that
is inhaled by the wearer, therefore needs to pass through the mask body 22
before it can
enter the wearer's breathing track. The mask 16 also may have a conformable
nose clip 24
that is mounted on the inside or outside of the mask body, or possibly between
additional
layers, if present, to provide a snug fit over the nose and where the nose
meets the
cheekbone.
The filtering face mask 16 does not necessarily need to exhibit the
configuration
shown in FIG. 3. The mask may take on other configurations such as the flat-
fold mask
shown in U.S. Patents 6,026,511 6,123,077, and 6,394,090 B1. Qr it may have
the
expanded cup-shaped configuration as shown in U.S. Patent 4,827,924 to
Japuntich. The
nose clip 24 may have the configuration described in U.S. Patent 5,558,089 to
Castiglione.
The mask also could have a thermochromic fit indicating seal at its periphery
to allow the
wearer to easily ascertain if a proper fit has been established - see U.S.
Patent 5,617,849
to Springett et al. In addition, the respirator filter element could take on
configurations
other than a molded maslc body. The filter element could be molded for use in
a filter
cartridge that has a particular shape, for example, a curved shape to reside
closer to a
wearer's face. The filter cartridge could be removably attached to a face
piece that fits over
-10-
CA 02492207 2005-O1-10
WO 2004/011123 PCT/US2003/018844
the nose and mouth of a person such as the elastomeric mask body described in
U.S. Patent
5,062,421 to Burns and Reischel.
FIG. 4 shows a cross-section of the mask body 22 of FIG. 3. As shown, the mask
body 22 only has one layer to provide it with its filtration properties and
with its shape
s retention properties. As indicated above, masks that have been made in the
past have
generally included a separate supporting structure or layer to furnish the
mask with its
structural integrity. The present invention, however, can provide a filtering
face maslc that
demonstrates very good filtration performance without using separate shaping
layers) and
microfiber-containing filter layer(s). The filtration and structural
properties may be
incorporated into a single layer that includes both thermally bonded staple
fibers and non-
thermally bondable microfibers. Although good filtration can be achieved in a
single-
layered product, other layers such as layers of additional filter media,
including layers of
electrically-charged BMF webs may be used to enhance the filtration
properties. Such
webs have been previously described - see U.S. Patent 4,795,668 to Krueger et
al,
4,874,399 to Reed et al, 4,988,560 to Meyer et al, and 5,496,507 to
Angadjivand et al.
Other examples of filter media that could be used include those that are
described in U.S.
Patents 5,898,91, 5,419,953, 4,798,850, 4,215,682, 4,178,157, 3,998,916, and
3,644,605.
These basic kinds of filter media may include mufti-layer composite air
filtration media
that uses a flame-retardant pre-filter layer, a blended-fiber filter material,
and webs of
fibrillated electrically-charged fibers. In addition, particulate matter, such
as active
particulate (which is particulate matter that is capable of serving a
function, including
adsorption, absorption, catalysis, etc.), for example, activated carbon, may
be introduced
into the web - see, e.g., U.S. Patent 3,971,373 to Braun - to produce a filter
element that
has the capacity to remove not only particulate matter but also gaseous
contaminants such
as acid gas, organic vapor, ammonia, and combinations of such gases.
Filter elements of the invention can achieve very good filtration performance,
as
noted by the Quality Factor, QF, parameter described below. QF values greater
than 0.30
(mm HZO)-1, and still greater than 0.40 (mm HZO)-1, and even greater than 0.70
or 0.80
(mm HZO)-1 may be obtainable.
In addition to being used in a respiratory mask, the present invention may
provide
other shaped structures, including air filters that take on a corrugated or
pleated shape for
-11-
CA 02492207 2005-O1-10
WO 2004/011123 PCT/US2003/018844
use as, for example, a furnace filter, a cabin air filter such as for use in
an automobile,
boat, or airplane and room air filters, including air conditioning filters.
FIG. 5 shows one arrangement of an apparatus 29 that is useful for preparing a
web
that contains both staple fibers and melt-blown microfibers. This apparatus 29
prepares
5 webs of melt-blown microfibers by extruding molten fiber-forming material
through a die
orifice 30. Solution-blown, and other types of microfibers, may also be used
to make
microfibers suitable for use in the present invention. The microfiber-blowing
portion of
the illustrated apparatus can be a conventional structure as taught, for
example, in Wente,
Van A. Superfine Thermoplastic Fibers, 48 Indus. Engn. Chem. 1342 et. seq.
(1956), or in
10 Report No. 4364 of the Naval Research Laboratories (May 25, 1954) entitled
Manufacture
of Superfine Organic Fibers by Wente, V. An.; Boon, C.D.; and Fluharty, E.L.
Such a
structure includes a die 26 that has an extrusion chamber 28 through which a
liquefied
fiber-forming material is advanced. Die orifices 30 may be arranged in line
across a
forward end of the die face through which the fiber-forming material is
extruded.
Cooperating gas orifices 32 are located adjacent to the die 30 and allow a
gas, typically
heated air, to be forced at very high velocity through it. The high-velocity
gaseous streams
draw out and attenuate the extruded fiber-forming material. The fiber-forming
material
then solidifies as the microfibers travel to a collector 34. The collector 34
typically is a
finely perforated screen, which in this case is on a closed-loop belt. The
collector can take
alternative forms, however, such as a flat screen or a drum or cylinder. The
collector also
can have a generally cylindrical forming surface that rotates about an axis
and moves in
the direction of the axis such that a selected point on the collector moves in
a helical
pattern - see U.S. Patent 6,139,308 to Berrigan et al. A gas-withdrawal
apparatus may be
positioned behind the screen to assist in depositing the fibers and removing
the gas.
The thermally-bondable staple fibers 12 may be introduced into the stream of
blown microfibers 14 in the illustrative apparatus shown in FIG. 5 through use
of a lickerin
roll 36 disposed above the microfiber-blowing apparatus. A web 38 of bulking
fibers,
typically a loose, nonwoven web such as prepared on a garnet machine or "Rando-
Webber", is propelled along a table 40 under a drive roll 42 where the leading
edge
engages against the lickerin roll 36. The lickerin roll 36 turns in the
direction of the arrow
and picks off fibers from the leading edge of the web 38, separating the
fibers from one
-12-
CA 02492207 2005-O1-10
WO 2004/011123 PCT/US2003/018844
another. The picked fibers are conveyed in an air stream through an included
trough or
duct 42 and into the stream of blown microfibers where they become mixed with
the
microfibers. The air stream is generated inherently by rotation of the
lickerin roll, or the
air stream may be augmented by use of an auxiliary fan or blower operating
through a duct
44.
The mixed stream of staple fibers and microfibers then continues to the
collector '
34 where the fibers form a web 10 of randomly intermixed and intertangled
fibers. Under
close examination, the staple fibers and microfibers may be thoroughly mixed -
for
example, free of clumps of staple fibers, that is, collections of staple
fibers of a centimeter
or more in diameter such as would be obtained if a chopped section of multi-
ended tow of
staple fiber were unseparated or if staple fibers were balled together before
being
introduced into the microfiber stream. The resulting web 10 may be peeled off
the
collector and wound into a storage roll and may be subsequently processed in
cutting,
handling, or molding operations.
The prepared composite web may consist of a single layer deposited by the
apparatus as shown, or may be a multi-layer product in which the layers are
typically
indistinguishable to at least casual inspection. Mufti-layer products can be
formed either
by passing the collected web under a mixing and depositing apparatus such as
illustrated in
FIG. 5 two or more times or by having additional mixing and depositing
apparatus
disposed along the length of a collecting belt.
The inventive filter elements have an electrical charge imparted to the web to
improve its filtering efficiency. The electric charge may be included on the
microfibers
alone, or on both the microfibers and staple fibers. If the staple fibers are
also desired to
be charged, they need to have a nonconductive surface so that any charge that
is placed on
the fibers does not dissipate. Thus, the staple fibers should be made from a
non-
conductive polymeric material as described above with respect to the
microfibers. Filter
media that utilizes electrically-chaxged meltblown microfibers is disclosed,
for example, in
U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,968,635 to Rousseau, et. al. The fibers can include surface
modifying
agents such as fluorine to improve oily mist filtration performance - see U.S.
Patent
6,398,847 Bl to Jones et al. Electric charge can be imparted to nonwoven
fibrous webs
using known techniques described in, for example, U.S. Patent 4,215,682 to
Kubik et al.,
-13-
CA 02492207 2005-O1-10
WO 2004/011123 PCT/US2003/018844
U.S. Patent 4,592,815 to Nakao, and U.S. Patent 5,496,507 to Angadjivand et
al. These
methods may include hydrocharging as described in the '507 patent to
Angadjivand et al.
or may include corona charging as described in the '815 .patent to Nakao, or
combinations
of such techniques. In addition, tribocharging techniques may be used as
described in U.S.
Patent 4,798,850 to Brown et al. More recent charging techniques are also
described in
U.S. Patent 6,375,886 B1 to Angadjivand and U.S. Patent 6,406,657 to Eitzman
et al. and
in U.S. Patent Application Serial Nos. 09/416,216 and 09/548,892, published as
International Patent Publications WO 01/27381 and WO 01/80257, respectively.
These
newer techniques may include use of non-aqueous polar liquids and other
methods of
achieving sufficient contact between the water and/or polar liquid and the
fibers. A known
hydrocharging method includes impinging a stream of water droplets on a web at
a
pressure sufficient to provide filtration enhancing electret charge. The
pressure necessary
to achieve optimum results may vary depending on the type of sprayer used, the
type of
polymer fiom which the web is formed, the concentration of additives to the
polymer, and
the thickness and density of the web, and whether pretreatment such as corona
surface
treatment is carried out before hydrocharging. Generally, pressures in the
range of about
10 to 500 psi (69 to 3450 kPa) are suitable. Preferably, the water used to
provide the water
droplets is relatively pure. Distilled or deionized water is preferable to tap
water.
FIG. 6 shows an example of a suitable spray means 45 for charging a web. The
fibrous web 10 is transported on support means 46 that may be in the form of a
belt,
preferably porous, such as a mesh screen or fabric. Water jets 48 in water jet
head 50
provide the water spray with a pump (not shown) providing the water pressure.
Water jets
48 impinge on web 10 at impingement points 52. Preferably, a vacuum is
provided
beneath a porous support to draw the spray through the web and to reduce
energy drying
requirements.
Further examples of suitable spray means for charging the nonwoven webs
include
nebulizers like the devices shown in the '507 patent to Angadjivand et al. In
this device,
water, which is provided through a water line, and pressurized air, which is,
provided
through air line, are supplied to a nozzle that impacts the web with a spray
mist pump
action sprayers where a pump handle forces water provided by water supply
means
through nozzle to provide a spray mist.
-14-
CA 02492207 2005-O1-10
WO 2004/011123 PCT/US2003/018844
The amount of charge imparted to the web may be measured using known
procedures, including thermally stimulated discharge (TSD) techniques - see,
for
example, U.S. Patent 6,375,886 B1 to Angadjivand et al. The molded electret
filter
preferably contains fibers that exhibit a persistent electric charge,
typically a charge that
persists for the intended service life of a filter element.
FIGs. 7-9 illustrate an apparatus 54 for forming shells 22 for face masks in
accordance with a method of this invention. Shells 22 may be produced by
passing a non-
woven fibrous web 10 through an optional preskimzing stage 56, a heating stage
58, and a
cold molding stage 60. Optionally a smoothing or cover web (not shown) may be
passed
in superimposed relation to web 10 to provide a more comfortable feel when in
contact
with the wearer's face. An example of a suitable cover web is described in
U.S. Patent
6,041,782 to Angadjivand et al. The cover webs may be made from spunbond
fibers or
meltblown fibers, including microfibers.
At preskinning stage 56, web 10 is heated to an extent that the bonding
components) of the staple fibers on web surfaces 62 and 64 are softened. The
lower
surface 62 and the upper surface 64 of web 10 contact heated calender rolls 66
and 68 to
soften the bondable components of the fibers. Upon leaving calender rolls 66
and 68, the
softened components of the fibers harden, and the fibers on surfaces 62 and 64
become
bonded to each other. Web 10 is then placed on a moving oven belt 70 and
enters the
heating stage 58.
At heating stage 58, infra-red (IR) heaters 72 and hot air impingement 74
through
perforations 76 heat the thermally bondable fibers in web 10 to soften the
bonded
components of the fibers throughout the web. Oven belt 70 has a mesh
construction that
permits the IR heat and hot air impingement to impinge on surfaces 62 and 64.
The
molding/heating conditions should be carefully controlled such that the
microfiber
components are preserved in a non-thermal bonded state. This is accomplished
by
preventing the autogenous bonding of the microfiber component during the
molding
process. Thermal bonds, such as provided by the staple fibers, provide a semi-
rigid three-
dimensional lattice of fibers in the molded filter element. The lattice of
thermal bonded
fibers maintains the mask in its molded shape without substantially inhibiting
airflow
through the fibrous network.
-15-
CA 02492207 2005-O1-10
WO 2004/011123 PCT/US2003/018844
After heating, web 10 is passed to cold molding stage 60 while the bonded
components of the fibers in web 10 are still soft. Web 10 is then transported
on belts 78
and 80 and is placed between unheated molding members 82 and 84 where it is
then
molded to the cup-shape shells 22 or more particularly to the shape of face
masks 22. A
ferris wheel type arrangement 86 may be employed to provide a continuous
molding
process. Ferris wheel arrangement 86 includes a first and a second rotating
apparatus, 88
and 90 respectively. Molding members 82 and 84 turn in a counter-clockwise and
clockwise rotation, respectively and are each driven by a chain 92 on
sprockets 78. At the
point of molding, members 82 and 84, come together to shape web 10 into cup-
shaped
shells 22. The apparatus shown in FIGs. 7-9 is more fully described in U.S.
Patent
5,307,796 to Kronzer et al.
Filter elements and face masks prepared in accordance with the present
invention
have the shaping and filtration layers integrally joined together, that is,
shape retention and
good filtering performance are provided in a single molded web and not two
separate webs.
or layers that are subsequently joined together, typically by a perimeter edge
seal. The
integral nature of inventive filter element will not allow the shaping and
filtration aspects
to be physically separated without destroying the filter element itself.
EXAMPLES
The following test methods were used to evaluate the webs and molded filter
elements:
PaYticulate PeyaetYatiou with Sodium Chloride
Penetration and pressure drop for individual molded filter was determined by
using
an AFT Tester, Model 8130, from TSI Incorporated, St. Paul, Minnesota. Sodium
Chloride (NaCI) at a concentration of 20 milligrams per cubic meter (mg/m3)
was used as
a challenge aerosol. The aerosol challenges were delivered at a face velocity
of 13.8
centimeters per second (cm/sec). Pressure drop over the molded filter specimen
was
measured during the penetration test and is reported in millimeters water (mm
Ha0).
-16-
CA 02492207 2005-O1-10
WO 2004/011123 PCT/US2003/018844
Average Geometric Fiber Diameter
Determining the average geometric fiber diameter for fibers used in webs for
the
invention can be carried out by image analysis of photomicrographs of a web
specimen.
Web specimens were prepared by mounting a web sample on a scamling electron
microscope stub and vapor-plating the fibers with approximately 100
A~.zgstroms (A) of
gold/palladium. Plating was done using a DENTON Vacuum Desk II Cold Sputter
apparatus (DENTON Vacuum, LLC, 1259 North Church Street, Moorestown, New
Jersey,
08057, USA) with a 40 milliamp sputter cathode plating source at a chamber
vacuum of
50 millitorr supplied with and Argon gas flow of 125-150 millitorr. Duration
of the
plating process was approximately 45 seconds. The plated sample was then
inserted in a
LEO VP 1450 scanning electron microscope (LEO Electron Microscopy Inc, One
Zeiss
Drive, Thournwood, New York, New York 10594) and imaged at a 0° tilt,
15 kilovolt (kV)
acceleration voltage, and 15 rnm WD (working distance). Electronic images
taken at
1000x magnification were used to determine microfiber diameters, and images
taken at
500 or 250 magnifications were used to determine staple fiber diameters.
Electronic
images of the surface view of a specimen were analyzed using a personal
computer
running UTHSCSA (University of Texas Health Science Center in San Antonio)
InZage
Tool for Windows version 2.00 available from the University of Texas. To
perform an
image analysis, the Image Tool was first calibrated to the microscope
magnification and
then the electronic image of a specimen processed so that individual fibers
were measured
across their width. Only individual fibers (no married or roping fibers) from
each image
are measured. A minimum of 18 to 20 staple fibers and a minimum of 66 up to
116 blown
microfiber fibers were measured from each sample. Fiber size is reported as
the mean
diameter in micrometers (~,m) for a given count number.
Molded Article Sti~aess Determination
Stiffness of a molded filter element was measured using a King Stiffness
Tester,
available from Jaking & Co., Greensboro, North Carolina. Stiffness is
determined as the
force required to push a 2.54 cm - diameter, flat-faced, probe 8.06 cm (3.175
inches)
depthwise into the filter element. The probe element was placed outside of the
filter
element and was oriented perpendicular to the platform onto which the filter
element is
-17-
CA 02492207 2005-O1-10
WO 2004/011123 PCT/US2003/018844
placed for testing. For a molded filtering facemask, the facemask is placed on
a platform
with the convex side of the mask facing towards, and centered under, the
probe. The
probe was then descended towards the mask at a rate of 32 mm/sec, contacting
the
facemask and compressing it to the specified extent (21 millimeters). At the
end of the full
descention of the probe, the force (in Newtons) required to compress the
article was
recorded.
Quality Factor (Q~
Quality factor is determined as follows:
The penetration and pressure drop are used to calculate a quality factor "QF
value"
from the natural log (Ln) of the NaCI penetration by the following formula:
QF (1/mm H2O) _ -Ln ~NaCI Penetration (%)/100}/Pressure Drop (mm HZO)
A higher initial QF value indicates better initial filtration performance.
Decreased QF
values effectively correlate with decreased filtration performance.
Example 1
A microfiber combination web used to form the molded filter element of the
present invention was prepared from a blend of blown microfiber and thermally
bondable
staple fibers according to the process described in U.S. Patent 4,118,531
(Hauser) and
shown above in Fig. 5. The blown microfiber component of the combination web
was
prepared using a blend of polypropylene Fina type 3960 available from F1NA Oil
and
Chemical Co., Houston, Texas and poly-4-methyl-1-pentene type TPX-DX820 from
Mitsui Petrochemical Industries, Ltd. of Tokyo, Japan. Chimassorb 944FL,
available from
Ciba Geigy Corporation, Hawthorne. New York, was included as a melt additive.
The
weight ratios of the components used in the blown microfiber component were
98%
polypropylene, 1.2% TPX-DX820, and 0.8% Chimassorb 944FL. The basis weight of
the
microfiber component was 98 grams per square meter (g/mz) and the average
geometric
fiber diameter was determined to be 4.4 ~,m according to the Average Geometric
Fiber
Diameter Test set forth above.
-18-
CA 02492207 2005-O1-10
WO 2004/011123 PCT/US2003/018844
The thermal bonding bicomponent staple fibers, blended with the microfiber web
to form the combination web, was CELBOND type T254 available from KOSA,
Charlotte,
North Carolina. The thermal bonding staple fiber had a linear density of 12
denier per
filament (dpf) and had a cut length 38 mm. The average geometric fiber
diameter was 33
pm. The staple fibers were introduced directly into the blown microfiber
stream. The
basis weight of the staple fiber component in the web was approximately 115
g/m2. The
total basis weight of the combination web was 214 g/m2.
The combination web was hydrocharged according to the process described in
U.S.
Patent 5,496,507 to Angadjivand et al. Hydrocharging was carried out by
passing the web
over a vacuum slot at a rate of 5 cn~/sec while deionized water was sprayed
onto the web at
a hydrostatic pressure of about 620 kilo/Pascals (kPa) from a pair of Teejet
9501 sprayer
nozzles (available from Spraying Systems Co., of Wheaton, Illinois) that were
mounted
about 10 cm apart and were centered about 7 cm above the vacuum slot. The web
was
then inverted, and the hydrocharging process was repeated to allow both sides
of the web
to be impinged with deionized water. Excess water was then removed by passing
the web
a third time over the vacuum slot. The web was then allowed to dry under
ambient
conditions by hanging.
Molding of the charged web was done by pressing the web between mating parts
of
a hemispherical cup-shaped heated mold that was about SS mm in height and had
a volume
of about 310 cm3. In this hot-molding method, the top and bottom halves of the
mold
were heated to about 110 °C, and the web was placed between the mold
halves. The
heated mold was then closed at a gap of 0.508 to 0.762 mm for approximately 15
seconds.
After the specified time, the mold was opened and the molded product was
removed.
Initial penetration and pressure drop of the molded face mask were measured
using
the AFT-8130 Particulate Penetration Test. Stiffiiess of the element was
measured by
Molded Article Stiffness Determination Test method. The test results are set
forth in
Table 1 below.
Example 2
A molded cup-shaped filter was prepared as described in Example 1 except that
the
bicomponent staple fiber was replaced with a blend of 70% CELBOND T254, (12
dpf,
-19-
CA 02492207 2005-O1-10
WO 2004/011123 PCT/US2003/018844
length 38 mm) and 30% polyester staple fiber, available as Type 295, (15 dpf,
length 38
mm). The average geometric fiber diameter for the CELBOND T254 staple fiber
was 33
~.m, the average geometric fiber diameter of the Type 295 was 35 ~,m, and the
average
geometric fiber diameter of the microfibers was 4.4 ~.m. The basis weight of
the staple
fiber component was approximately 130 g/m2. The total basis weight of the
combination
web was approximately 242 g/m2. The molded cup-shaped filter element in this
example
was tested and the results are shown in Table 1 below.
Example 3
A molded filter was prepared as in Example 1 except that the bicomponent
staple
fiber was replaced with a blend of 49% CELBOND T254, (12 dpf, length 38 mm),
21%
polyester staple fiber, available as Type 295, (15 dpf, length 38 mm), and 7%
microfiber
microwebs as described in U.S. Patent No. 4,813,946 to Insley. The average
geometric
fiber diameter for the CELBOND T254 staple fiber was 33 ~,m, the average
geometric
fiber diameter of the Type 295 was 35 ~,m, and the average geometric fiber
diameter of the
microfibers was 4.4 Vim. The melt additive, CHIMASSORB 944FL, that was used in
this
Example was at 1.0 weight % substituted for the combination of TPX-
DX820/CHIMASSORB 944FL that was used in Example 1. The ratio of the
polypropylene blown microfiber was raised to 99 weight %. The basis weight of
the
blown microfiber component on the combination web was approximately 52 ghn2,
the
staple fiber was approximately 115 g/m2, and the microfiber microwebs
approximately 17
glmz. The total basis weight of the combination web was about 219 g/mz. The
article of
Example 3 was tested for pressure drop, penetration, and stiffiiess, and the
Quality Factor
was determined:
TABLE 1
Example Pressure Penetration Stiffness Quality Factor
Number Drop % F
mm H20
1 7.0 2.6 1.5 0.52
2 6.5 4.2 0.7 0.49
3 8.9 5.1 2.3 0.33
-20-
CA 02492207 2005-O1-10
WO 2004/011123 PCT/US2003/018844
The data shown in Table 1 demonstrate that the pressure drop can be lowered
with
the addition of staple fiber and still have a molded shell stiffness greater
than 0.5 Newtons.
The addition of microfiber microwebs increases the pressure drop somewhat but
then also
increases the stiffiiess.
Exa~aple 4
A blown microfiber combination web was prepared as describe in Example 1 using
45 weight % blown microfiber, and 55 weight % thermal bonding bicomponent
staple
fiber. The average geometric fiber diameter for the staple and microfibers
were 33 and 4.4
p,m, respectively. In this example no TPX or CHIMASSORB 944 were added to the
microfiber. The resulting combination web had a total basis weight of about
100 g/mz.
The web was treated on both faces by a fluorinating as described generally in
WO 00/01737. The web of the example was fluorinated using a parallel-plate
capacitively
coupled plasma reactor Model 2480 from PlasmaTherm, St. Petersburg, Florida.
The
electrode gap was reduced from its 15 cm to 1.6 cm in PlasmaTherm for this
experiment.
The web sample was cut into sections of 20.3 cm by 30.5 cm and was placed on
the
powered electrode in the reactor. The reactor chamber was then closed and was
pumped to
a chamber pressure of about 1.3 Pa or less. Perfluoropropane C3F8 gas
available from 3M
Company, St. Paul, Minnesota was metered into the chamber at a rate of 83
standard
cm3/min until a chamber pressure of 40 Pa was reached. The electrodes of the
chamber
were then power to 1000 Watts using a 13.56 MHz from a power supply, and the
web
treated for one minute. The plasma was then extinguished, and the gas delivery
discontinued. The chamber was then evacuated and was vented to atmospheric
pressure
before the sample was removed, turned over, and placed back in the reactor.
The process
was repeated, with both faces of the web receiving the equivalent treatment.
Then the treated web was charged and molded as described in Example 1, except
that the belt speed for charging was 10.2 cm/sec and the water pressure was
827 lcPa. The
water jets were placed 15 cm above the belt. The molded web was tested for
NaCI particle
penetration and pressure drop, and the results are set forth in Table 2.
-21-
CA 02492207 2005-O1-10
WO 2004/011123 PCT/US2003/018844
Example S
A web was prepared as described in Example 4, except that in the fluorination
treatment the C3F$ gas flow rate was 169 standard cm3/min, the chamber
pressure was 66.7
Pa, with a 30 second treatment time for each face of the web. Two layers of
the web were
combined and molded as described in Example 1. The molded webs were tested for
NaCl
particle penetration and pressure drop, and the QF value was calculated, and
the results are
given in Table 2:
TABLE 2
Example Basis Pressure PenexrationStiffness QF
Weight Drop (%) NaCI (N)
/m2 mm H20
4 100 5.5 0.769 ---- 0.89
5 I .- 200 12.7 0.013 ~ 0.35 0.70
- -~
The data shown above in Table 2 demonstrate that, in comparison to Examples 1-
3,
by fluorinating the web, the basis weight can be reduced while getting better
filtration
performance.
All patents and patent applications cited above, including international
publications
and documents cited in the Background section, are incorporated by reference
into this
document as if reproduced in full.
This invention may be suitably practiced in the absence of any element or item
not
specifically described above.
_22_
