Language selection

Search

Patent 2496922 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2496922
(54) English Title: SILANISED, STRUCTURALLY MODIFIED, PYROGENICALLY PRODUCED SILICA
(54) French Title: SILICE SILANISEE, MODIFIEE STRUCTURELLEMENT ET PRODUITE DE MANIERE PYROGENIQUE
Status: Deemed expired
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C09C 1/30 (2006.01)
  • C09D 7/12 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • MEYER, JUERGEN (Germany)
  • FRAHN, STEPHANIE (Germany)
  • ETTLINGER, MANFRED (Germany)
(73) Owners :
  • EVONIK DEGUSSA GMBH (Not Available)
(71) Applicants :
  • DEGUSSA AG (Germany)
(74) Agent: MARKS & CLERK
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2012-03-13
(86) PCT Filing Date: 2003-07-29
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 2004-03-11
Examination requested: 2005-05-17
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/EP2003/008331
(87) International Publication Number: WO2004/020532
(85) National Entry: 2005-02-25

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
102 39 423.7 Germany 2002-08-28

Abstracts

English Abstract




Silanised, structurally modified, pyrogenically produced silicas,
characterised by groups fixed to the surface, wherein the groups are
dimethylsilyl and/or monomethylsilyl, are produced in that pyrogenically
produced silica is treated by a known method with dimethyldichlorosilane
and/or monomethyltrichlorosilane, the groups dimethylsilyl and/or
monomethylsilyl being fixed on the surface of the pyrogenic silica, and is
then structurally modified and optionally post-ground. They are used to
improve scratch resistance in lacquers.


French Abstract

La présente invention concerne des silices silanisées, structurellement modifiées et produites par pyrogénation. Ces silices se caractérisent en ce qu'elles comprennent des groupes fixés à la surface, lesquels sont des groupes diméthylsilyl et/ou monométhylsilyl. La silice, produite par pyrogénation, est traitée au moyen d'un procédé connu avec un diméthyldichlorosilane et/ou un monométhyltrichlorosilane, les groupes diméthylsilyl et/ou monométhylsilyl étant fixés sur la surface de la silice pyrogène, puis elle est structurellement modifiée et éventuellement broyée. Les silices de la présente invention servent à améliorer la résistance à la rayure de laques.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.





19

The embodiments of the invention in which an exclusive

property or privilege is claimed are defined as follows:

1. A silanised, structurally modified, pyrogenically
produced silica, characterised by groups fixed to the
surface, wherein the groups are dimethylsilyl and/or
monomethylsilyl, said silica having a tamped density of 280
g/l or less, having been structurally modified by being
ball milled, and having the following physico-chemical
characteristics:


BET surface area m2/g: 25-400
Average size of the primary particles nm: 5-50
pH value: 3-10
Carbon content %: 0.1-10
DBP value %: < 200.


2. The silanised, structurally modified, pyrogenically
produced silica according to claim 1, which has a tamped
density of 100 to 280 g/l.


3. A process for the production of the silanised,
structurally modified, pyrogenically produced silica as
defined in claim 1, the process comprising the steps of:
treating pyrogenically produced silica with
dimethyldichlorosilane and/or monomethyltrichlorosilane to
fix the groups dimethylsilyl and/or monomethylsilyl on the
surface of the pyrogenic silica; and

structurally modifying the silica by ball milling and
optionally post-grinding the silica.


4. A process for the production of the silanised,
structurally modified, pyrogenically produced silica




20


according to claim 3, wherein the silica is tempered after
the structural modification and/or post-grinding.


5. The process according to claim 4, wherein tempering
takes place under protective gas.


6. The process according to claim 3, 4 or 5, wherein
post-grinding is by air-jet mill or pin mill.


7. A method for improving the scratch resistance of a
lacquer comprising incorporating into the lacquer the
silanized, structurally modified, pyrogenically produced
silica as defined in claim 1.


8. A lacquer comprising a polyurethane and a silica
silanised with dimethylsilyl and/or monomenthylsilyl, said
silica having been structurally modified by being ball
milled and having the following physico-chemical
characteristics:


BET surface area m2/g: 25-400
Average size of the primary particles nm: 5-50
pH value: 3-10
Carbon content %: 0.1-10
DBP value %: < 200


said silica having a tamped density of 285 g/l or less.

9. A surface coated with the lacquer as defined in claim
8.


10. The surface according to claim 9, which is metal.


Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.



CA 02496922 2011-03-25

Silanised, Structurally Modified, Pyrogenically Produced
Silica
The invention relates to a silanised, structurally
modified, pyrogenically produced silica, a process for the
production thereof and its use.

It is known to use nanoscale particles in transparent
coating compositions.

Thus, according to US 6,020,419, pyrogenically produced
silicon dioxides, deagglomerated in situ, which have been
made hydrophobic with dimethyldichlorosilane (Aerosilo R
972), are used in polyurethane lacquers to improve the
scratch resistance of the coatings.

The known silica has the disadvantage that it cannot be
produced in powder form without a lacquer binder.

The object therefore existed of developing a silica that
does not have these disadvantages.

The present invention provides silanised, structurally
modified, pyrogenically produced silicas, which are
characterised by groups fixed on the surface, the groups
being dimethylsilyl and/or monomethylsilyl, preferably
dimethylsilyl.

In a preferred embodiment of the invention the silicas can
have the following physico-chemical characteristics:

BET surface area m2/g: 25 - 400
Average size of the primary particles nm: 5 - 50
pH value: 3 - 10
Carbon content 0.1 - 10
DBP value < 200

The silica according to the invention can have a tamped
density of 100 to 280, preferably 100 to 240 g/l.


CA 02496922 2008-01-04

2
A tamped density of more than 280 g/l leads to poorer
results in the technical lacquer tests.

Pyrogenic silicas are known from Winnacker-Kiichler
Chemische Technologie, volume 3 (1983)
4th edition, page 77 and
Ullmanns Enzyklopadie der technischen Chemie, 4th edition
(1982), volume 21, page 462.

In particular, pyrogenic silicas are produced by flame
hydrolysis of vaporisable silicon compounds, such as e.g.
SiC14, or organic silicon compounds, such as
trichloromethylsilane.

The invention also provides a process for the production of
the silanised, structurally modified, pyrogenically
produced silicas according to the invention, which is
characterised in that pyrogenically produced silica is
treated with dimethyldichiorosilane and/or
monomethyltrichlorosilane by a known method, the
dimethylsilyl and/or monomethylsilyl groups being fixed on
the surface of the pyrogenic silica, and is then
structurally modified and optionally post-ground. The
silicas according to the invention have a tamped density of
280 g/1 or less.

In one embodiment of the invention a tempering. can take
place after the structural modification and/or post..-
grinding.

The silicas according to the invention can be produced e.g.
as follows:

The silicas, which can be produced as described in DE 1 163
784, are then structurally modified by mechanical action
and possibly post-ground in a mill. A tempering can
possibly take place after the structural modification
and/or post-grinding.,


CA 02496922 2008-01-04
2a

The structural modification can take place e.g. with a ball
mill or a continuously operating ball mill. The post-


CA 02496922 2005-02-25
WO 2004/020532 PCT/EP2003/008331
3
grinding can take place e.g. using an air-jet mill or pin
mill. The tempering can take place batchwise, e.g. in a
drying cupboard, or continuously, e.g. in a fluidised bed.
The tempering can take place under protective gas, e.g.
nitrogen.

The silicas according to the invention can be incorporated
into lacquers, as a result of which these lacquers have
increased scratch resistance.


CA 02496922 2005-02-25
WO 2004/020532 PCT/EP2003/008331
4
Examples

Production and physico-chemical properties of the silicas
Production of the comparative silicas:
The production of the comparative silicas 1, 2 and 3 takes
place as described in DE 1 163 784.

Production of the silicas according to the invention:
The silicas, which are produced as described in DE 1 163
784, are then structurally modified by mechanical action
and possibly post-ground in a mill. A tempering can
possibly take place after the structural modification
and/or post-grinding.

The structural modification can take place e.g. with a ball
mill or a continuously operating ball mill. The post-
grinding can take place e.g. using an air-jet mill or pin
mill. The tempering can take place batchwise, e.g. in a
drying cupboard, or continuously, e.g. in a fluidised bed.
The tempering can take place under protective gas, e.g.
nitrogen.


CA 02496922 2005-02-25
WO 2004/020532 PCT/EP2003/008331
O

b
0
U
U
0 0 0 0 0 0 o w w 0 0
z z z z z z z >4 >4 z z
=ri
r-i
N
N
4-)
b
cd
'rl
r-I
-ri
N
41 UJ
O
0 0 0 0 aa) o aw
= ~aa) w to 0
z z z z > z _
c/ii'~

F
0
U
U)
A
4J
44
0
N N N N N N N N N N N
0
11 z ZI zi >4 >4 >4
4.1
U
rO
0
a ri ri ri ri ri ri ri ri H H ri ri H ri
r-I ri ri ri r-I r-I ri r-I r-I ri H ri
N N N N N N N N N N N co N N
41 r-i ri ri ri H H r-I rl rl rl ri rl ri rl
44 ^ 1' .r .r . A
L 4-1 J.) 4-1 JJ JJ LJ 4-1 4.1 4-)' L 4.! 4.1 4.)
O N N G) N N N a) U) a) OJ 01 O) N a)
w A A A A A a a Q A a S
A w A A A
r.,

O ri CV M
O 1 1 .1 H 1
w N N N

0 -H ri iJ H CV M u1 % N co O. H H
H 14 v] U1 y [A ~, v] N UJ


CA 02496922 2005-02-25
WO 2004/020532 PCT/EP2003/008331
41 M In w In %D rn .-i r op o r In %D In
.--1 .1 (n .1 .1 .- r .0 Ln r1 In 10 In .1
N .1 N .1 N .1
r

y~ M 1D In 1, O ch O %0 N
In In M 10 In In lfl M In In l0
G7] N N N

O
a-.1
00 19 cD C9 O ri .1 N co N N O
O .--I .--I O O .1 .1 .--1 11 O .1 .1 .1 O
V
.1)
0 O 00 O O 01 N N d. N .1 O M N O
J-) m .0 In sM In 10 l0
rJ)

b
0 In \O O 10 1O N N N N N M Ill N N
O O ri O O O O O O O .1 O .1 O
N

0 .""I In l~ .1 .1 M M N N N M l- N
O O O O O O O O i O O O O O
LW e
O
rcl
~ a+
U N ~O M 10 O\ M ~~Iyyn GO ~~M77 O
' %0 n N (n CD C14 N N Oo CD

U U d
O
U i
.~ U) rI N M
P4
41 N N W

(C +' ++ .i N M In t0 [, co 01 10 1-4 14
H O

6


CA 02496922 2005-02-25
WO 2004/020532 PCT/EP2003/008331
7
Example 1:

For the investigation of the improvement in scratch
resistance, a conventional 2-component polyurethane lacquer
was used. The formulation of the lacquer and its
production, including application, are summarised below:
Formulation

Millbase Parts
by wt.
Acrylic copolymer, mod. with synthetic fatty
acids, 60% solution 43.4
Butyl acetate 98% 17.8
Xylene 3.9
AEROSIL 5.0

70.7
Lacquer make-up

Xylene 11.3
Ethoxypropyl acetate 3.4
Butyl glycol acetate 1.6
Aliphatic polyisocyanate, approx. 75% in 1- 18.6
methoxypropyl-2-acetate/xylene 1:1

105.0


CA 02496922 2008-01-04

8
Binder concentration: 40%
AEROSIL calculated on the basis of millbase (solids): 19.2%
AEROSIL calculated on the basis of lacquer (total): 5.0%
AEROSIL calculated on the basis of lacquer (solids): 12.5%
Production and application of the lacquers.

The binder is mixed with the solvents. Then, for the
purpose of predispersion, the AEROSIL is incorporated. into
this mixture with the high-speed mixer (disk 0 45 mm) and
predispersed for 5 min at 2000 rpm. The mixture is
dispersed in a laboratory pearl mill for 30 min at 2500 rpm
and 60% pump capacity using glass beads (0 approx. 1 mm).
The millbase is tested with a grindometer, 25 m, in
accordance with DIN ISO 1524. It must be smaller than
m.

The conversion of the millbase to lacquer takes place in
accordance with the formulation, the components being mixed
with a vane agitator at 2000 rpm. The hardener is
incorporated in the same way.

After adjusting the lacquers to spray viscosity in
accordance with DIN 53411, the lacquers are applied to
black lacquered metal sheets, e.g. DT 36 (fromQ-Panel) by
spray application (coat thickness about 40-50 m). After
spraying, the metal sheets are dried for 24 h at room.
temperature and then for 2 h in a drying oven at 70 C.
Scratch tests:

The metal sheets are abraded with a quartz/water slurry
(100 g water + 1 g Marlon A 350, 0.25% + 5 g SikrorMF500)
using an abrasion and washing-resistance tester (Erichsen,
brush with hog's bristles). The gloss before and 10 min
after the abrading is determined with a reflectometer (2.0
irradiation angle).


CA 02496922 2005-02-25
WO 2004/020532 PCT/EP2003/008331
v
I U
S=4
a
M N
U ya
O S \ _
LO Ln O M O CO N -0
ri
ro
4-i U
O ri 0 to
q*
H ri N -0 U)
U) cM V N N H N 0 00 ri 00
ro
O N l-
H N O) U1 O
rl 0 N M 0 x v 00
~~ U? M V Co N N ri O CD r-I N
v
J-) ,i v
N
N
~4 (0 > co Q 0)
v
CL =d 0 00
r--I N
~. r-1 1-1 0) 0 N N U1
0) 0 =ri rn N Ul 10 I4 N M
U U) V r-1 QO N O o N \
~I v

v
U
w ri u1 Ln CO 0
PG \ U1 N .-I N 0 co m U1
b

=ri O U1 M
r1 ri N -0 0
r-I =r-I VI N V N N N 0) 0 co co
44
A rd U
4--) rl CD
ri H ri O Ln
Q Cl) r-1 V dl N r-I N O CO M CO
d N
v IJ r=1
ro I
v 0
N r ri O O N N 0) O O
a ='~ O = -I N .-1 00 M 1=4 0) M
0 r-I U U) V 10 1-1 Co N 0 M ~M \
Fi r4 0) r=; r4 0 CD
U)
44 0
IQ w
1.1 %D C) k too [*.,
44 Cn
O 4-i ri {.." O
O + ro =r1 k N
`)o alai U .u U) rO
0) id

C!) ?I r~-I =d o U1 3
$4 41
0 4J>i >1 a N W 0 o W n
(L) 41 4J rZ r-I -H 44 9

rI ri ro O m O JJ Soli JJ A I)
N
`1104 Hi O V o V b
=f Hi 0
f-I iJ (~' > G4 U) 04 to W, dO


CA 02496922 2005-02-25
WO 2004/020532 PCT/EP2003/008331
The silicas 1 + 2 and 3 + 4 according to the invention can
be used in high concentrations without impairing the
appearance of the lacquer surface owing to their
substantially lower rheological efficiency compared with
5 comparative silicas 1 and 2. In addition, the silicas
according to the invention display a substantial
improvement in the scratch resistance of the lacquer
surface.


CA 02496922 2008-01-04

11
Example 2

In this example the influence of the structural
modification was investigated on the basis of a high solids
2-component PU clear lacquer. The formulation of the
lacquer and its production, including application and
testing, are summarised below:

Formulation
Millbase Parts by wt.
Acrylic copolymer, mod. with synthetic
fatty acids,
70% in n-butyl acetate 61.0
Butyl acetate 98% 7.3
Methoxypropyl acetate 1.7
SolvessoM100 2.0
Xylene 2.0
BaysilonMOL 17, 10% in xylene (silicone
oil)
0.7
AEROSIL
5.0
E 79.7
Lacquer make-up (hardener)

Aliphatic polyisocyanate, 90% in n-
butyl acetate 22.3
Butyl acetate 98% 2.0
Solvesso 100 1.0

105.0


CA 02496922 2005-02-25
WO 2004/020532 PCT/EP2003/008331
12
Binder concentration: 62.8%
Aerosil calculated on the basis of millbase (solids):11.7%
Aerosil calculated on the basis of lacquer (total): 5.0%
Aerosil calculated on the basis of lacquer (solids): 8.0%

Production and application of the lacquers

The binder is mixed with the solvents. Then, for the
purpose of predispersion, the AEROSIL is incorporated into
this mixture with the high-speed mixer (disk 0 45 mm) and
predispersed for 5 min at 2000 rpm. The mixture is
dispersed in a laboratory pearl mill for 30 min at 25.00 rpm
and 60% pump capacity using glass beads (0 approx. 1 mm).
The millbase is tested with a grindometer, 25 m, in
accordance with DIN ISO 1524. It must be smaller than
10 m.

The conversion of the millbase to lacquer takes place in
accordance with the formulation, the components being mixed
with a vane agitator at 2000 rpm. The hardener is
incorporated in the same way.

After adjusting the lacquers to spray viscosity in
accordance with DIN 53411, the lacquers are applied to
black lacquered metal sheets, e.g. DT 36 (from Q-Panel), by
spray application (coat thickness about 40-50 m). After
spraying, the metal sheets are dried for 24 h at room
temperature and then for 2 h in a drying oven at 70 C.


CA 02496922 2008-01-04

13
Scratch tests:

The metal sheets are abraded with a quartz/water slurry
(100 g water + 1 g Marlon A 350, 0.25% + 5 g Sikron F500)
using an abrasion and washing resistance tester (Erichsen,
= 5 brush with hog's bristles). The gloss before and 10 min
after the abrading is determined with a reflectometer (200
irradiation angle).

Table 4: Summary of the properties of the liquid lacquers
relevant in terms of lacquer technology, and of the applied
10' and dried films.

Coarparative Silica Silica Reference
silica 2 3 4.

Grindaneter value [ m] < 10 < 10 < 10 /
Viscosity (millbase) [mPas]

6 rpm 6200 1500 541 140
60 rpm 2100 900 559 195
Viscosity (lacquer + hardener)
[mPas)

6 rpm 3821 1041 491 167
60 rpm 1320 666 446' 195
Flay marked
OR
orange-peel

20 reflectometer value before 81.0 83.5 82.8 88.0
scratching

Haze 25 5 6 2
40 strokes with Sikrcxi F 500
residual gloss [%3 94.3 93.4 82.0

The silicas 3 + 4 according to the invention can be used in
high concentrations without impairing the appearance of the
lacauer surface owing to their substantially lower


CA 02496922 2005-02-25
WO 2004/020532 PCT/EP2003/008331
14
rheological efficiency compared with comparative silica 2.
In addition, the silicas according to the invention display
a substantial improvement in the scratch resistance of the
lacquer surface.


CA 02496922 2008-01-04

Example 3

Direct comparison of the silicas according to the invention
with a scratch-resistant lacquer according to DE 198 11 790
Al, in which AEROSIL R 972 is used to improve the scratch
5 resistance.

Prior art Silicas 2)
according to the
invention
Mi1ibase
Desmopher?"A 2009/1 190.2
Methoxypropyl acetate :
3.8
Solvesso 100 1:1
AEROSIL 23.0
E
J 250.0
Lacquer make-up
Desmophen A YEP4-55A, contains 96.0 -
AEROSIL R 972
Milibase - 48.9
DesmophenM2009/1- - 24.9
OL 17, 10% in MPA - -
Modaflow 1% in MPA - -
MPA : Solvesso 100 1:1 11.6 33.8
Butyl glycol acetate 10.5 10.5
ByketolTMOK 7.5 7.5
TM
Byk 141 0.8 0.8
Hardener addition
DesmodurMN 3390 23.6 23.6
E 150.0 150.0


CA 02496922 2005-02-25
WO 2004/020532 PCT/EP2003/008331
16
Production and application of the lacquers

1) Comparative silica 1 is incorporated into the binder
in accordance with DE 198 11 790 Al using a jet
disperser.

2) The binder is mixed with the solvents. Then, for the
purpose of predispersion, the AEROSIL is incorporated
into this mixture with the high-speed mixer (disk 0
45 mm) and predispersed for 5 min at 2000 rpm. The
mixture is dispersed in a laboratory pearl mill for
30 min at 2500 rpm and 60% pump capacity using glass
beads (0 approx. 1 mm). The millbase is tested with a
grindometer, 25 m, according to DIN ISO 1524. It must
be smaller than 10 m.

The conversion to lacquer of the millbases corresponding to
.1) or 2) takes place in accordance with the formulation,
the components being mixed at 2000 rpm with a vane
agitator. The hardener is incorporated in the same way.
After adjusting the lacquers to spray viscosity in
accordance with DIN 53411, the lacquers are applied to
black lacquered metal sheets, e.g. DT 36 (from Q-Panel), by
spray application (coat thickness about 40-50 m). After
spraying, the metal sheets are dried for 24 h at room
temperature and then for 2 h in a drying oven at 70 C.


CA 02496922 2008-01-04

17
Scratch tests:

The metal sheets are abraded with a quartz/water. slurry
(100 g water + 1 g Marlon- A 350, 0.25% + 5 g SikronMF 500)
using an abrasion and washing resistance tester (Erichsen,
brush with hog's-bristles). The gloss before and 10 min
after the abrading is determined with a reflectometer (200
irradiation angle).

Table 5: Summary of the properties of the liquid lacquers
relevant in terms of lacquer technology, and of the applied
and dried films.

Prior art silica 1 Silica 4 Reference
Grindcoeter value [pmt] < 10 < 10 < 10 /
Viscosity (millbase)
[mPas]

6 rpm 58 30 26 30
60 rpm 48 43 33 40
wave scan
long wave 4.8 1.2 1.1 1.4
short wave 6.5 3.0 3.1 4.7
reflectceneter value 89.0 90.2 89.16 90.8
before scratching

Haze before scratching 4 4 3 4
40 strokes with Sikron F 500
Residua] gloss [%] 78.3 85.9 86.2 55.3
It is shown that a substantially better improvement in the
residual gloss is achieved after a scratch stressing of the
15 lacquer surface by using the silicas according to the
invention than with the prior art. In addition, owing to


CA 02496922 2005-02-25
WO 2004/020532 PCT/EP2003/008331
18
their low rheological efficiency, the silicas according to
the invention do not cause an orange-peel effect.

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 2496922 was not found.

Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date 2012-03-13
(86) PCT Filing Date 2003-07-29
(87) PCT Publication Date 2004-03-11
(85) National Entry 2005-02-25
Examination Requested 2005-05-17
(45) Issued 2012-03-13
Deemed Expired 2013-07-30

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 2005-02-25
Application Fee $400.00 2005-02-25
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 2 2005-07-29 $100.00 2005-02-25
Request for Examination $800.00 2005-05-17
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 3 2006-07-31 $100.00 2006-06-20
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 4 2007-07-30 $100.00 2007-06-26
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 5 2008-07-29 $200.00 2008-06-19
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 2009-03-31
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 6 2009-07-29 $200.00 2009-06-29
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 7 2010-07-29 $200.00 2010-06-25
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 8 2011-07-29 $200.00 2011-06-23
Final Fee $300.00 2011-12-16
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
EVONIK DEGUSSA GMBH
Past Owners on Record
DEGUSSA AG
ETTLINGER, MANFRED
FRAHN, STEPHANIE
MEYER, JUERGEN
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Cover Page 2005-05-05 1 29
Abstract 2005-02-25 1 61
Claims 2005-02-25 1 35
Description 2005-02-25 18 459
Description 2008-01-04 19 496
Claims 2008-01-04 1 37
Claims 2009-04-16 3 90
Description 2011-03-25 19 496
Claims 2011-03-25 2 60
Cover Page 2012-02-14 1 32
Prosecution-Amendment 2009-04-16 5 163
PCT 2005-02-25 6 189
Assignment 2005-02-25 3 128
Prosecution-Amendment 2005-05-17 1 36
Prosecution-Amendment 2005-06-30 1 30
Prosecution-Amendment 2007-07-06 3 83
Prosecution-Amendment 2008-01-04 17 915
Prosecution-Amendment 2008-10-16 3 96
Assignment 2009-03-31 5 244
Prosecution-Amendment 2010-09-27 2 60
Prosecution-Amendment 2011-03-25 5 164
Correspondence 2011-08-16 1 53
Correspondence 2011-12-16 1 31